DOCSLIB.ORG

The Metalogicon of John of Salisbury: Medieval Rhetoric As Educational

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Metalogicon of John of Salisbury: Medieval Rhetoric As Educational Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 2013 The etM alogicon of John of Salisbury: Medieval Rhetoric as Educational Praxis Brian Gilchrist Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Gilchrist, B. (2013). The eM talogicon of John of Salisbury: Medieval Rhetoric as Educational Praxis (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/580 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE METALOGICON OF JOHN OF SALISBURY: MEDIEVAL RHETORIC AS EDUCATIONAL PRAXIS A Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Communication & Rhetorical Studies McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Brian J. Gilchrist May 2013 Copyright by Brian Gilchrist 2013 THE METALOGICON OF JOHN OF SALISBURY: MEDIEVAL RHETORIC AS EDUCATIONAL PRAXIS By Brian J. Gilchrist Approved March 22, 2013 ______________________________ __________________________________ Dr. Pat Arneson Dr. Richard H. Thames Associate Professor of Communication Associate Professor of Communication & Rhetorical Studies & Rhetorical Studies (Committee Chair) (Committee Member) ______________________________ Dr. Janie Harden Fritz Associate Professor of Communication & Rhetorical Studies (Committee Member) ______________________________ __________________________________ Dr. James Swindal Dr. Ronald C. Arnett Dean, McAnulty College and Graduate Chair, Department of Communication School of Liberal Arts & Rhetorical Studies Professor of Philosophy Professor of Communication & Rhetorical Studies iii ABSTRACT THE METALOGICON OF JOHN OF SALISBURY: MEDIEVAL RHETORIC AS EDUCATIONAL PRAXIS By Brian J. Gilchrist May 2013 Dissertation supervised by Dr. Pat Arneson This dissertation addresses the following question: what are the implications of John of Salisbury‟s rhetorical theory for his approach to education? The Metalogicon, John‟s defense of the trivium, represents the primary text analyzed throughout the project. John‟s medieval rhetorical theory explicated the reciprocal relationship between rhetoric and education. The art of rhetoric acquired educational elements by providing ethical- theoretical frameworks to inform the practices of students and teachers. Experiences from the practices of students and teachers influenced the art of rhetoric. John called for an approach to medieval rhetorical education that could be placed into the service of all people living in God‟s world. Five chapters offer answers to the guiding question. Chapter One, “John of Salisbury: A Rhetorician of the Middle Ages,” situates John within the historical moment of the High Middle Ages in Western Europe. John‟s iv personal experiences and the overall significant historical events shaped his perspective about medieval rhetorical education. Chapter Two, “John of Salisbury‟s Intellectual Influences: Cicero and Aristotle,” explores how the writings of Cicero and Aristotle informed John‟s assumptions about the relationship between Ciceronian rhetoric and Aristotelian dialectics within medieval rhetorical education. John attempted to place the newly translated Latin writings of Aristotle, The Organon, into the service of medieval rhetorical education. Chapter Three, “John of Salisbury‟s The Metalogicon: An Artifact of Medieval Epideictic Rhetoric,” examines The Metalogicon as a composition representing medieval epideictic rhetoric. John offered an account of his educational experiences in which he praised teachers who promoted the liberal arts, blamed teachers who rejected the liberal arts, and celebrated the timeless values of a philosophical approach to education. Chapter Four, “The Metalogicon as Rhetorical Dialectical Synthesis,” articulates John‟s contribution to medieval rhetorical theory. John synthesized Ciceronian rhetoric with Aristotelian dialectics to expand the scope of rhetorical practices. Chapter Five, “The Metalogicon: A Medieval Response to Contemporary Calls for Educational Praxis,” concludes the dissertation by announcing John‟s call for praxis as the telos of medieval rhetorical education. The Metalogicon offered implications to the communication discipline by addressing John‟s contribution to medieval rhetorical theory and articulating pedagogical practices beneficial to contemporary educators. v DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my mother Linda who provided countless amounts of love and support throughout my life. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to thank the following people who have made this dissertation possible. First, I want to thank my family, especially my mother Linda, for their encouragement. The Department of Communication & Rhetorical Studies provided academic stimulation and financial aid that gave me the opportunity to reach for a better life. I should like to pay particular tribute to Ronald C. Arnett, Pat Arneson, Isaac E. Catt, Janie Harden Fritz, Erik Garrett, Craig T. Maier, Kathleen Glenister Roberts, Richard Thames, and Calvin L. Troup. Many other colleagues generously offered ideas and help, among them Ken Bohl, Jill Seibert Burk, Deborah Eicher-Catt, Jerry Clack, Lisa A. Davis, Dave DeIuliis, Kathy Glass, Natalie Nardelli Gigliotti, Annette M. Holba, John Jasso, John Lawson, Paul Lucas, Christina L. Marinchak, Doug Marshall, Rita McCaffrey, Amanda G. McKendree, Melinda Miller, Marianne Pabis, Jeanne Pursuit, Celeste Grayson Seymour, Amanda Seville, Dave Stern, Anthony Wachs, and Cem Zeytinoglu. This dissertation articulates the power of teaching. It is highly personal, which reflects the lifelong influences of extraordinary teachers. These wonderful educators include Ed Burak, Eileen Byrne, Patrick W. Conner, Lara Farina, Ed Kanitra, Adam Komisaruk, John Lamb, Sue Ann Masley, Janet Meyers, Sarah Alison Miller, Richard Pierce, Mike Samek, Robert Shevchik, William B. Smith, Ethel Morgan Smith, Dave Vestal, Robert Wojtkowski, and Katherine Yerep. Finally, I wish to thank my students for their inspiration, especially the students from Hopewell High School class of 2012, the students from my English classes during the Summer Sessions at the Community College of Beaver County (2008-2012), the students from my Communication Skills classes at Robert Morris University, the students from my English classes at West vii Virginia University, and the students from my Communication classes at Duquesne University. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract iv Dedication vi Acknowledgement vii Chapter 1: John of Salisbury: A Rhetorician of the Middle Ages 1 The High Middle Ages 5 Portrait of John‟s Early Life 19 John‟s Writings 38 Conclusion 39 Chapter 2: John of Salisbury‟s Intellectual Influences: Cicero and Aristotle 41 Cicero‟s Influences on the Middle Ages 42 Aristotle‟s Influences on the Middle Ages 49 Cicero and Aristotle‟s Influences on John 56 Conclusion 71 Chapter 3: John of Salisbury‟s The Metalogicon: An Artifact of Medieval Epideictic Rhetoric 73 Medieval Epideictic Rhetorical Tradition 73 John‟s Approach to Epideictic Rhetoric 76 The Metalogicon as an Artifact of Medieval Epideictic Rhetoric 85 Conclusion 101 Chapter 4: The Metalogicon as Rhetorical Dialectical Synthesis 103 Interpretive Translation as a Rhetorical Act 104 Scholarly Perspectives about John 107 ix Communication Scholarship about John 109 John‟s Rhetorical Theory in The Metalogicon 111 Conclusion 138 Chapter 5: The Metalogicon: A Medieval Response to Contemporary Calls for Educational Praxis 139 Traditions of Medieval Rhetorical Education 139 John‟s Perspective about Teaching 145 John‟s Ethical Approach to Medieval Rhetorical Education 147 John‟s Medieval Rhetorical Education Promotes Virtue 149 John‟s Call for Rhetorical Educational Praxis 153 The Implications of John‟s Medieval Rhetorical Theory 157 Summary 175 175 References 178 x CHAPTER ONE John of Salisbury: A Rhetorician of the Middle Ages Public education in contemporary, postmodern American society remains a contentious issue following the passage of The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. The NCLB Act (2001) proposed to evaluate school performance in relationship with standardized test scores. This national piece of legislation granted individual states the right to create their own standardized tests. Standards of achievement in the test scores were determined on a state-by-state basis (ED.gov). In the years following the enactment of the NCLB Act (2001), elected representatives from both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party expressed reservations about the success of the legislation. While politicians from both parties may agree that the American public educational system from kindergarten through 12th grade should be reformed to meet the challenges of a globalized marketplace, they cannot arrive at a consensus to solve the problems. Over the course of the next decade from 2001 to 2012, controversies emerged regarding how individual states developed practices for meeting standards of student learning outcomes. Since 2011, The Texas State Board of Education changed the content of textbooks, especially in United States history class, used in public schools to increase learning outcomes of students. Some of these proposals included alternative interpretations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thomas Ricklin, « Filosofia Non È Altro Che Amistanza a Sapienza » Nadja
    Thomas Ricklin, « Filosofia non è altro che amistanza a sapienza » Abstract: This is the opening speech of the SIEPM world Congress held in Freising in August 2012. It illustrates the general theme of the Congress – The Pleasure of Knowledge – by referring mainly to the Roman (Cicero, Seneca) and the medieval Latin and vernacular tradition (William of Conches, Robert Grosseteste, Albert the Great, Brunetto Latini), with a special emphasis on Dante’s Convivio. Nadja Germann, Logic as the Path to Happiness: Al-Fa-ra-bı- and the Divisions of the Sciences Abstract: Divisions of the sciences have been popular objects of study ever since antiquity. One reason for this esteem might be their potential to reveal in a succinct manner how scholars, schools or entire societies thought about the body of knowledge available at their time and its specific structure. However, what do classifications tell us about thepleasures of knowledge? Occasionally, quite a lot, par- ticularly in a setting where the acquisition of knowledge is considered to be the only path leading to the pleasures of ultimate happiness. This is the case for al-Fa-ra-b-ı (d. 950), who is at the center of this paper. He is particularly interesting for a study such as this because he actually does believe that humanity’s final goal consists in the attainment of happiness through the acquisition of knowledge; and he wrote several treatises, not only on the classification of the sciences as such, but also on the underlying epistemological reasons for this division. Thus he offers excellent insight into a 10th-century theory of what knowledge essentially is and how it may be acquired, a theory which underlies any further discussion on the topic throughout the classical period of Islamic thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories and Images of Creation in Northern Europe in the Twelfth Century
    Art History ISSN 0141-6790 Vol. 22 No. 1 March 1999 pp. 3-55 In the Beginning: Theories and images of creation in Northern Europe in the twelfth century Conrad Rudolph 'Logic has made me hated by the world!' So Peter Abelard thought and wrote to his former lover, the brilliant Heloise, in probably his last letter to her before his death in 1142, after having been virtually driven from Paris by Bernard of Clairvaux, the austere Cistercian mystic and perhaps the most powerful ecclesiastical politician of Western Europe.1 Characteristically for Abelard in matters of self-conception, he was exaggerating. Logic had made him hated not by the world but by only a portion of it. While this was certainly an influential portion and one that had almost succeeded in destroying him, it could never do so entirely. In fact, logic had made Abelard 'the Socrates of the Gauls, the great Plato of the West, our Aristotle ... the prince of scholars'2- and this, this great fame and the almost unprecedented influence that accompanied it, was as much the problem as logic was. In a word, Abelard had been caught up in the politics of theology. The time was one of great theological inquiry, challenging, as it did, the very authority of divine revelation on the most fundamental level, and at a moment when both interest in secular learning and the number of students were dramatically increasing - all factors that can hardly be over-emphasized. But for certain elements within the Church, more still was at stake. And this was nothing less than a perceived assault on one of the basic underpinnings of the complex relationship between religion, theology, society and political power.
    [Show full text]
  • John of Salisbury's Entheticus Maior and Minor, Edited by Jan Van Laarhoven
    Restoring Knowledge: John of Salisbury’s “Return to the Tree” by Gordon Gray M.F.A., University of California (Los Angeles), 1969 B.A., Stanford University, 1967 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Humanities Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Gordon Gray 2013 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2013 Approval Name: Gordon Gray Degree: Master of Arts (Humanities) Title of Thesis: Restoring Knowledge: John of Salisbury’s “Return to the Tree” Examining Committee: Chair: Anne-Marie Feenberg-Dibon Associate Professor and Graduate Chair Paul Edward Dutton Senior Supervisor Professor Christine Jones Supervisor Senior Lecturer Emily O’Brien External Examiner Assistant Professor Department of History Date Defended/Approved: April 24, 2013 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract In 1159 CE, the English diplomat and ecclesiastic John of Salisbury published two books, the Policraticus and the Metalogicon, the former a treatise on the nature of good governance, and the latter a defence of classical education. Believing that political leadership should be based on moral precepts, John observed that moral judgment seemed to have been largely replaced in both church and state by personal ambition for wealth and power. Believing further that the knowledge required for moral judgment should be gained through proper education, John reasoned that knowledge itself had become fractured, and that it was necessary to return to that point and rebuild knowledge anew. Concluding that the fracture occurred with Adam’s expulsion from paradise for eating from the tree of knowledge, John reasoned that mankind must “return to the tree.” This thesis analyzes John’s “return to the tree” within the intellectual context of the twelfth-century renaissance.
    [Show full text]
  • DEMONSTRATION and Scientific KNOWLEDGE in WILLIAM OF
    Longeway-000.FM 11/8/06 2:29 PM Page iii Demonstration and Scientific knowledge in william of ockham ATranslation of Summa Logicae III-II: De Syllogismo Demonstrativo, and Selections from the Prologue to the Ordinatio JO HN LEE LO NGEWAY University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana © 2007 University of Notre Dame Press Longeway-000.FM 11/8/06 2:29 PM Page iv Copyright © 2007 by University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 www.undpress.nd.edu All Rights Reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Longeway, John. Demonstration and scientific knowledge in William of Ockham : a translation of Summa Logicae III-II : De Syllogismo Demonstrativo, and selections from the Prologue to the Ordinatio / John Lee Longeway. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn-13: 978-0-268-03378-1 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-268-03378-1 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Knowledge, Theory of. 2. Science —Methodology. 3. Logic. 4. Aristotle. Posterior analytics. 5. William, of Ockham, ca. 1285– ca. 1349. Summa logicae. 6.William, of Ockham, ca. 1285– ca. 1349. I. Title. bd161.l66 2006 160 —dc22 2006032380 ∞This book is printed on acid-free paper. © 2007 University of Notre Dame Press Longeway-01.Intro 11/8/06 2:28 PM Page 1 introduction The medievalist needs no convincing that William of Ockham (ca. 1285–1347) is worthy of study. At one time Ockham’s views might have been regarded as a clever but uninstructed sign of the decay of Scholastic discourse, but, with the work of such scholars as Philotheus Boehner, Ernest Moody, and Marilyn McCord Adams, those days are now receding into the past.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reply to Peter Dronke Lodi Nauta William of Conches' Commentary On
    © Lodi Nauta, in Studi Medievali, 45, 2004, 445-457 William of Conches and the “New Aristotle”: A Reply to Peter Dronke Lodi Nauta William of Conches’ commentary on Boethius’ Consolatio Philosophiae, which was his first work (ca. 1120), has come down to us in at least 17 manuscripts, containing the entire text of his Glosae super Boetium in its characteristic continuous-lemmatic form.1 The text, which is explicitly attributed to William in three manuscripts, has all the characteristic features of William’s method, style and philosophical outlook, and contains references to his projected commentaries on Macrobius, Martianus Capella and Plato. The work proved to be a successful one: there is a great number of Boethian manuscripts which testify to its wide dissemination throughout the Middle Ages.2 This rich material can be divided into several (not mutually exclusive) categories: glosses which (ultimately) go back to William’s work, and which are to be found in dozens of manuscripts; commentaries in the form of compilations in which parts of William’s work are mixed with other commentaries (e.g. that of Remigius of Auxerre from about 900 and his eleventh-century revisers); the marginal commentary that accompanies the Latin text of the Consolatio and Jean de Meun’s translation, Li Livres de Confort de Philosophie; and several other commentaries which derive material from William. Of special importance is a version, which, while keeping most of William’s text intact, is much longer and also in a different format. I have found at least eleven manuscripts of this version, but without doubt there are more to be found.3 The author adds substantially to the text, rewrites a large number of passages, and omits passages and quotations from William’s text.
    [Show full text]
  • Colleague, Critic, and Sometime Counselor to Thomas Becket
    JOHN OF SALISBURY: COLLEAGUE, CRITIC, AND SOMETIME COUNSELOR TO THOMAS BECKET By L. Susan Carter A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of History–Doctor of Philosophy 2021 ABSTRACT JOHN OF SALISBURY: COLLEAGUE, CRITIC, AND SOMETIME COUNSELOR TO THOMAS BECKET By L. Susan Carter John of Salisbury was one of the best educated men in the mid-twelfth century. The beneficiary of twelve years of study in Paris under the tutelage of Peter Abelard and other scholars, John flourished alongside Thomas Becket in the Canterbury curia of Archbishop Theobald. There, his skills as a writer were of great value. Having lived through the Anarchy of King Stephen, he was a fierce advocate for the liberty of the English Church. Not surprisingly, John became caught up in the controversy between King Henry II and Thomas Becket, Henry’s former chancellor and successor to Theobald as archbishop of Canterbury. Prior to their shared time in exile, from 1164-1170, John had written three treatises with concern for royal court follies, royal pressures on the Church, and the danger of tyrants at the core of the Entheticus de dogmate philosophorum , the Metalogicon , and the Policraticus. John dedicated these works to Becket. The question emerges: how effective was John through dedicated treatises and his letters to Becket in guiding Becket’s attitudes and behavior regarding Church liberty? By means of contemporary communication theory an examination of John’s writings and letters directed to Becket creates a new vista on the relationship between John and Becket—and the impact of John on this martyred archbishop.
    [Show full text]
  • John of Salisbury, the Policraticus, and Political Thought
    John of Salisbury, the Policraticus, and Political Thought Quentin Taylor Rogers State University Introduction Given his reputation as the most learned and literate man of his time, it is remarkable that John of Salisbury (ca.1120-1180) is not better known to the Western world. Granting the general “ob- scurity” of the Middle Ages, it remains odd that the man uni- formly recognized as the “finest flower” of the twelfth-century re- naissance has not attracted greater attention.1 What makes this state of affairs doubly ironic is that John is among the most read- able of medieval authors. By common consent, he was a stylist of the first order, and as a humanist he speaks in a language intelli- gible to the modern reader. Indeed, it is difficult to identify an- other writer between Augustine and Chaucer with a greater ap- peal to modern sensibility than the Sage of Salisbury.2 Perhaps the root cause of the general neglect of John is the fail- ure of modern scholarship to make his principal work, the Policraticus, readily available to teachers, students, and the read- ing public. To this day there is no complete English translation of QUENTIN TAYLOR is Associate Professor of History and Political Science at Rogers State University. 1 David Knowles, The Evolution of Medieval Thought (New York: Random House, 1962), 140. 2 As William Ebenstein has written, the Policraticus is “a thoroughly enjoy- able piece of literature, modern in its wit, urbanity, learning, balance, and per- spective.” Introduction to Political Philosophy (New York: Rhinehart, 1952), 65. John of Salisbury, the Policraticus, and Political Thought HUMANITAS • 133 the Latin original.3 This peculiarity is echoed in the relative dearth of studies devoted to John.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Political Thought Also by John Morrow
    History of Political Thought Also by John Morrow T. H. Green: Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings (with Paul Harris) Coleridge's Political Thought Coleridge's Writings: On Politics and Society A History of English Political Thought in the Nineteenth Century (with Mark Francis) History of Political Thought A Thematic Introduction John Morrow palgrave C> John Morrow 1998 AU rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright. Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1 P OLP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright. Designs and Patents Act 1988. Published by PALGRAVE Houndmills. Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York. N. Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE is the new global academic imprint of 5t. Martin's Press LLC Scholarly and Reference Division and Palgrave Publishers Ltd (formerly Macmillan Press Ltd). ISBN 978-0-333-63221-5 ISBN 978-1-349-25939-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-25939-7 this book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fuUy managed and sustained forest sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organic Theory of the State with Reference to Plato, John of Sailsbury and Bernard Bosanquet
    Durham E-Theses The organic theory of the state with reference to Plato, John of Sailsbury and Bernard Bosanquet Jones, M.C. How to cite: Jones, M.C. (1967) The organic theory of the state with reference to Plato, John of Sailsbury and Bernard Bosanquet, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9548/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the 'organic'theory of the state' with reference to Plato, John of Salisbury and Bernard Bosanquet. According to the analysis of this theory, drawn from the analogy with the human organism, the health of the whole depends on the healthy discharge by each part of its own proper function. Thus, the part is not only subordinate to the whole, but cannot exist apart from it.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Translation of the Correspondence of John of Salisbury: Letters 136-175
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1946 An Annotated Translation of the Correspondence of John of Salisbury: Letters 136-175 Daniel V. Harkin Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Harkin, Daniel V., "An Annotated Translation of the Correspondence of John of Salisbury: Letters 136-175" (1946). Master's Theses. 202. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/202 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1946 Daniel V. Harkin AN A~rnOTATED TRANSLATION OF THE CORRESPONDENCE OF JOHN OF SALISBURY, LETTERS 136-175 by Daniel V. Harkin, S.J. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment ot' the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Loyola University Chicago, Illinois February .l946 VITA The candidate, DanieL V. Harkin, S.J., was born Septem- ber 18, 1920, in Chicago, Illinois. After eLementary schooling in the Glencoe Public School, GLencoe, Illinois, he was enrolled at Loyola Academy, Chicago, in September of 1933, and graduated in 1937 • He attended Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., from 1937 to May, 1940, when he returned to Chicago after the death of hie father, and enrolled at the Lake Shore Campus of Loyola University.
    [Show full text]
  • John Hosler on John of Salisbury and the Medieval Roman Renaissance
    Irene O'Daly. John of Salisbury and the Medieval Roman Renaissance. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2018. x + 244 pp. $115.00, cloth, ISBN 978-1-5261-0949-1. Reviewed by John Hosler Published on H-Italy (November, 2018) Commissioned by Peter Sposato (Indiana University Kokomo) John of Salisbury, one of the best-known John of Salisbury’s life, education, and career; the scholars of the so-called Renaissance of the principal historiographical approaches taken by Twelfth Century, is presently undergoing a renais‐ modern scholars thus far; and her guiding sance all his own. Work on John has increased methodology, which is the “Cambridge school” substantially since the 1980s. A slew of new re‐ model that investigates political thought in the search has appeared in monographs, essays, and context that produced it. Chapter 1, “The Roman new editions and translations of John’s extensive Inheritance,” addresses John of Salisbury’s atti‐ and diverse corpus, which includes three books tudes towards antiquity, seeking to explore why, (including the massive Policraticus), two Lives, on the one hand, he was so interested in its texts, two works in verse, and 325 letters. The present but on the other, why he seemingly cared little book under review is Irene O’Daly’s contribution about its material culture. It contains a survey of to this dynamic conversation. It seeks to examine John’s ancient sources, where and when he may John’s writings in a new context: leaving behind have encountered them, and in what form. The the old lenses of medieval humanism, scholasti‐ topic has been explored before by Janet Martin cism, or Aristotelianism, she instead employs the and Anne Duggan, among others, but this is a nice concept of “Roman Renaissance,” through which summary that includes two concentrated subsec‐ the reception of Roman philosophy, “particularly tions on Seneca and Cicero.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority, Reason, and Experience in the Construction of Medieval Natural Knowledge
    Assessing the Exotic: Authority, Reason, and Experience in the Construction of Medieval Natural Knowledge by Adam Gwyndaf Garbutt A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto © Copyright by Adam Gwyndaf Garbutt, 2018 ii Assessing the Exotic: Authority, Reason, and Experience in the Construction of Medieval Natural Knowledge Adam Gwyndaf Garbutt Doctor of Philosophy Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto 2018 Abstract This study explores evidence structures in the medieval investigation of nature, particularly the marvelous or exotic nature that exists near the boundaries of natural philosophy. The marvelous, exotic, and unusual are fascinating to both readers and authors, providing windows into the ways in which the evidence structures of reason, authority, and experience were balanced in the assessment, explanation, and presentation of these phenomena. I look at four related works, each engaged with the compilation and presentation of particular information concerning animals and the diversity of the natural world. While these texts are bound together by shared topics and draw from a shared body of ancient and contemporary works, they each speak to different audiences and participate in different genres of literature. I argue that we can see in these works a contextually sensitive approach to the evaluation and presentation of evidence on the part of both the author and the audience. This project also seeks to bridge a gap between the intellectually rigorous medieval texts and works targeted at a wider reading audience that made use of the knowledge base of natural philosophy but were not necessarily produced or consumed within the scholastic context.
    [Show full text]