Psychotropic Substances, Statistics for 2011, Assessments of Annual
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The In¯Uence of Medication on Erectile Function
International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 17±26 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 The in¯uence of medication on erectile function W Meinhardt1, RF Kropman2, P Vermeij3, AAB Lycklama aÁ Nijeholt4 and J Zwartendijk4 1Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, The Netherlands; 3Pharmacy; and 4Department of Urology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Keywords: impotence; side-effect; antipsychotic; antihypertensive; physiology; erectile function Introduction stopped their antihypertensive treatment over a ®ve year period, because of side-effects on sexual function.5 In the drug registration procedures sexual Several physiological mechanisms are involved in function is not a major issue. This means that erectile function. A negative in¯uence of prescrip- knowledge of the problem is mainly dependent on tion-drugs on these mechanisms will not always case reports and the lists from side effect registries.6±8 come to the attention of the clinician, whereas a Another way of looking at the problem is drug causing priapism will rarely escape the atten- combining available data on mechanisms of action tion. of drugs with the knowledge of the physiological When erectile function is in¯uenced in a negative mechanisms involved in erectile function. The way compensation may occur. For example, age- advantage of this approach is that remedies may related penile sensory disorders may be compen- evolve from it. sated for by extra stimulation.1 Diminished in¯ux of In this paper we will discuss the subject in the blood will lead to a slower onset of the erection, but following order: may be accepted. -
Abecarnil/Allobarbital 959 Pharmacopoeias
Abecarnil/Allobarbital 959 Pharmacopoeias. In Eur. (see p.vii). acamprosate’s action including inhibition of neuronal hyper- maleate in the treatment of anxiety disorders, hiccups, and nau- Ph. Eur. 6.2 (Acamprosate Calcium). A white or almost white excitability by antagonising excitatory amino acids such as sea and vomiting. Acepromazine, as the base, has also been giv- powder. Freely soluble in water; practically insoluble in alcohol glutamate. en in preparations for the management of insomnia. and in dichloromethane. A 5% solution in water has a pH of 5.5 1. Wilde MI, Wagstaff AJ. Acamprosate: a review of its pharmacol- Preparations to 7.0. ogy and clinical potential in the management of alcohol depend- ence after detoxification. Drugs 1997; 53: 1038–53. Proprietary Preparations (details are given in Part 3) Adverse Effects 2. Anonymous. Acamprosate for alcohol dependence? Drug Ther Denm.: Plegicil; Turk.: Plegicil. The main adverse effect of acamprosate is dosage-related diar- Bull 1997; 35: 70–2. Multi-ingredient: Fr.: Noctran. rhoea; nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain occur less frequent- 3. Mason BJ. Treatment of alcohol-dependent outpatients with acamprosate: a clinical review. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 (suppl ly. Other adverse effects have included pruritus, and occasionally 20): 42–8. a maculopapular rash; bullous skin reactions have occurred rare- 4. Overman GP, et al. Acamprosate for the adjunctive treatment of Aceprometazine (rINN) ly. Depression and fluctuations in libido have also been reported. alcohol dependence. Ann Pharmacother 2003; 37: 1090–9. Hypersensitivity reactions including urticaria, angioedema, and 5. Anton RF, et al. Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral 16-64 CB; Aceprometazina; Acéprométazine; Aceprometazi- anaphylaxis have been reported very rarely. -
Smumedical Journal
SMU Medical Journal ISSN : 2349 – 1604 (Volume – 4, No. 1, January 2017) Review Article Indexed in SIS (USA), ASI (Germany), I2OR & i-Scholar (India), SJIF (Morocco) and Cosmos Foundation (Germany) databases. Impact Factor: 3.835 (SJIF) Analytical Aspects with Brief Overview of Depressants Sandeep Kumar1 Nand Gopal Giri2 Ashok Kumar Jaiswal3* Anil Kumar Jaiswal4 1M.Sc. (Forensic Science), LNJN NICFS, New Delhi 110085, 2Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry, Shivaji College (University of Delhi) Raja Garden, New Delhi 110 027, 3Dept. of Forensic Medicine and toxicology, All India institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029.4Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, St. Andrew’s PG College, Gorakhpur, UP. *Corresponding author Manuscript received : 30.10.2016 Manuscript accepted: 21.11.2016 Abstract Depressants are drugs that slow down the functions of the central nervous system (CNS). These drugs are used to reduce anxiety and insomnia without drowsiness. The depressants cause relaxed feeling if used in small quantity but cause unconsciousness, vomiting and even death if taken in high quantity. It affects concentration and coordination of a person by slowing down his/ her ability to respond in unexpected situations. These drugs are also attributed for their physiological and psychological effects, eventually in large dose it become lethal. The different 142 SMU Medical Journal, Volume – 4, No. – 1, January, 2017 physical and chemical features of some very often used depressants are discussed in this manuscript. Keyword: Depressant, TLC, UV spectroscopy, HPLC, GLC etc. Introduction The classical depressants are hypnotics (which induce sleep), most antianxiety medicine (diazepam or valium), muscle spasm prevent seizure, but these drugs rapidly develop dependence and tolerance which finally leads to coma and death, so use of these drugs is highly unsafe. -
Drug and Medication Classification Schedule
KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION UNIFORM DRUG, MEDICATION, AND SUBSTANCE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE KHRC 8-020-1 (11/2018) Class A drugs, medications, and substances are those (1) that have the highest potential to influence performance in the equine athlete, regardless of their approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (2) that lack approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration but have pharmacologic effects similar to certain Class B drugs, medications, or substances that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Acecarbromal Bolasterone Cimaterol Divalproex Fluanisone Acetophenazine Boldione Citalopram Dixyrazine Fludiazepam Adinazolam Brimondine Cllibucaine Donepezil Flunitrazepam Alcuronium Bromazepam Clobazam Dopamine Fluopromazine Alfentanil Bromfenac Clocapramine Doxacurium Fluoresone Almotriptan Bromisovalum Clomethiazole Doxapram Fluoxetine Alphaprodine Bromocriptine Clomipramine Doxazosin Flupenthixol Alpidem Bromperidol Clonazepam Doxefazepam Flupirtine Alprazolam Brotizolam Clorazepate Doxepin Flurazepam Alprenolol Bufexamac Clormecaine Droperidol Fluspirilene Althesin Bupivacaine Clostebol Duloxetine Flutoprazepam Aminorex Buprenorphine Clothiapine Eletriptan Fluvoxamine Amisulpride Buspirone Clotiazepam Enalapril Formebolone Amitriptyline Bupropion Cloxazolam Enciprazine Fosinopril Amobarbital Butabartital Clozapine Endorphins Furzabol Amoxapine Butacaine Cobratoxin Enkephalins Galantamine Amperozide Butalbital Cocaine Ephedrine Gallamine Amphetamine Butanilicaine Codeine -
Economic and Social Council 1 November 2010
* United Nations E/CN.7/2010/21 Economic and Social Council 1 November 2010 Original: English Commission on Narcotic Drugs Reconvened fifty-third session Vienna, 2 December 2010 Agenda item 5 Improving the collection, reporting and analysis of data to monitor the implementation of the Political Declaration and Plan of Action on International Cooperation towards an Integrated and Balanced * Strategy to Counter the World Drug Problem Annual report questionnaire: Part Three. Extent and patterns of and trends in drug use∗∗ Note by the Secretariat Pursuant to Commission on Narcotic Drugs resolution 52/12, a meeting of the expert group on data collection was held in Vienna from 12 to 15 January 2010 to review the current data collection tools and collection, collation, analysis and reporting processes. Pursuant to Commission decision 53/2, the Secretariat produced a revised version of the draft annual report questionnaire; the expert group held a meeting in Vienna from 11 to 13 October 2010 to finalize the questionnaire so that the Commission could adopt it at its reconvened fifty-third session. The Secretariat hereby transmits part three of the questionnaire; parts one, two and four will be made available in separate documents (E/CN.7/2010/19, E/CN.7/2010/20 and E/CN.7/2010/22). __________________ * Reissued for technical reasons on 30 January 2012. ∗∗ The present document was submitted after the date required by the 10-week rule as the meeting of the expert group on data collection was held from 11 to 13 October 2010. V.10-57492* (E) *1057492* E/CN.7/2010/21 Annual report questionnaire Part Three. -
Lists of Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances and Precursors, Turnover of Which on the Territory of Azerbaijan Republic Is Prohibited, Restricted and Controlled
Lists of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors, turnover of which on the territory of Azerbaijan Republic is prohibited, restricted and controlled. List I. Narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors, turnover of which on the territory of Azerbaijan Republic is prohibited. Narcotic drugs, turnover of which on the territory of Azerbaijan Republic is prohibited: 1. Alilprodine 2. Alphameprodin 3. Alphametadol 4. Alpha-methylfentanyl 5. Alpha-methylthiofentanyl 6. Alphaprodine 7. Alphasethylmetadol 8. Alfentanyl 9. Anileridine 10. Acetorfine 11. Acetyl-alpha-methylfentanyl 12. Acetyldihydrocodeine 13. Acetylmetadol 14. Benzetidine 15. Bernzoilmorphine 16. Benzylmorphine 17. Betacetylmetadol 18. Beta-hydroxyifentanyl 19. Beta-hydroxy-3-methylfentanyl 20. Betameprodine 21. Betametadol 22. Betaprodine 23. Bezitramide 24. Dextromoramid 25. Dextropropoxifen 26. Dezomorphine 27. Diampromyd 28. Diethyltiambuten 29. Diphenoxine 30. Diphenoxylate 31. Dihydrocodeine 32. Dihydromorphine 33. Dimepeptanol 34. Dimethyltiambuten4 35. Dioxafethyl butyrate 36. Dimenoxadol 37. Dipipanon 38. Drotebanol 39. Ecgonine 40. Ethylmethyltiambuten 41. Etonitazen 42. Etorphine 43. Etokseridin 44. Fenadokson 45. Fenampromide 46. Fenazosin 47. Fenomorphane 48. Fenoperidine 49. Folkodin 50. Furetidin 51. Heroin 52. Hydrokodon 53. Hydromorphineol 54. Hydromorphone 55. Hydromorphine-N-oxide 56. Hydroxypethidine 57. Izometadone 58. Cannabis 59. Ketobemidone 60. Klonitazen 61. Coca leafs 62. Cocaine 63. Codeine-N-oxsid 64. Kodoxyme 65. Levometorphan 66. Levomoramide 67. Levofenasilmorphane 68. Levorfanol 69. Metazosine 70. Methyldezorphine 71. Methyldihydromorphine 72. 3-methylfentanyl 73. 3-methyltiofentanyl 74. Metopon 75. Mirofin 76. Moramid intermediate 77. Morferidin 78. Morphine metobromid 79. Morphine-N-oksid 80. MPPP 81. Nikokodin 82. Nikadicodine 83. Nikomorphine 84. Norasetimetadol 85. Norcodeine 86. Norleforfanol 87. Normetadon 88. Normorphine 89. Norpipapon 90. Oksikodon 91. Oksimorfon 92. Para-Fluorofentanyl 93 PEPAP 94. -
Forensic Toxicology Scope of Testing and Detection Limits
J. RYAN MCMAHON II County Executive INDU GUPTA, MD, MPH MEDICAL EXAMINER’S OFFICE Commissioner of Health FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY CAROLYN H. REVERCOMB, MD, DABP ONONDAGA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Chief Medical Examiner KRISTIE BARBA, MS, D-ABFT-FT CENTER FOR FORENSIC SCIENCES Toxicologist Forensic Toxicology Scope of Testing and Detection Limits Table of Contents QUALITATIVE ANALYSES.........................................................................................................2 Volatile Screen by GC/FID .............................................................................................................2 Carbon Monoxide by Microdiffusion..............................................................................................2 Carbon Monoxide by CO-Oximeter ................................................................................................2 Ethylene Glycol by GC/MS.............................................................................................................2 ELISA Buprenorphine by IA for Blood/Urine ................................................................................2 ELISA by IA for Blood ...................................................................................................................3 ELISA by IA for Urine....................................................................................................................4 Gamma Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) by GC/MS..................................................................................5 Gabapentin, -
Panacea Or Pipe Dream: Does Portugal's Drug Decriminalization Policy Translate for Hawaii? Honolulu, HI: Legislative Reference Bureau, January 2017
PANACEA OR PIPE DREAM: DOES PORTUGAL’S DRUG DECRIMINALIZATION POLICY TRANSLATE FOR HAWAII? Primary Researchers: PAUL KANOHO JOHNNY BRANNON MATTHEW PRELLBERG Research Attorneys Supervising Researcher: EDWIN L. BAKER Senior Researcher Report No. 1, 2017 Legislative Reference Bureau State Capitol Honolulu, Hawaii http://lrbhawaii.org This report has been cataloged as follows: Kanoho, Paul + Brannon, Johnny + Prellberg, Matthew + Baker, Edwin L. Panacea or pipe dream: does Portugal's drug decriminalization policy translate for Hawaii? Honolulu, HI: Legislative Reference Bureau, January 2017. 1. Drug legalization – Portugal. 2. Drug legalization – Hawaii. KFH421.5 L35 A25 17-1 FOREWORD This report was prepared in response to House Concurrent Resolution No. 127, H.D. 1, S.D. 1 (2016), which requested the Legislative Reference Bureau to analyze the potential impact on state government of decriminalizing certain offenses regarding the illegal possession of drugs. The Bureau requested information from federal, state, county, and private entities and individuals to complete this study. The Bureau extends its appreciation to all those that generously provided information and assistance in the preparation of this report. Charlotte A. Carter-Yamauchi Director January 2017 iii Table of Contents Page FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. -
Perspectives in Drug Discovery a Collection of Essays on the History and Development of Pharmaceutical Substances
Perspectives in Drug Discovery A Collection of Essays on the History and Development of Pharmaceutical Substances Professor Alan Wayne Jones Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, National Board of Forensic Medicine Perspectives in Drug Discovery A Collection of Essays on the History and Development of Pharmaceutical Substances Professor Alan Wayne Jones Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology National Board of Forensic Medicine Perspectives in Drug Discovery A Collection of Essays on the History and Development of Pharmaceutical Substances Professor Alan Wayne Jones Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, National Board of Forensic Medicine Artillerigatan 12 • SE-587 58 Linköping • Sweden E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.rmv.se RMV-report 2010:1 ISSN 1103-7660 Copyright © 2010 National Board of Forensic Medicine and Professor Alan Wayne Jones Design and graphic original: Forma Viva, Linköping • Sweden Printed by Centraltryckeriet, Linköping • Sweden, October 2010 Contents Preface Introduction 1. The First Sedative Hypnotics . 13 2. The Barbiturates ......................... 19 3. The Benzodiazepines ..................... 25 4. Narcotic Analgesics . 31 5. Central Stimulant Amines . 39 6. The First Antidepressants .................. 45 7. Antipsychotic Medication ................. 51 8. Aspirin and Other NSAID .................. 59 9. General Anesthetics . 65 10. SSRI Antidepressants . 71 11. Histamine Antagonists .................... 79 12. Anticonvulsants ......................... 87 -
Stembook 2018.Pdf
The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. -
201 PART 329—HABIT-FORMING DRUGS Subpart A—Derivatives
Food and Drug Administration, HHS § 329.1 section 502(e) of the Federal Food, PART 329ÐHABIT-FORMING DRUGS Drug, and Cosmetic Act. (d) The statement expressing the Subpart AÐDerivatives Designated as amount (percentage) of alcohol present Habit Forming in the product shall be in a size reason- ably related to the most prominent Sec. printed matter on the panel or label on 329.1 Habit-forming drugs which are chem- which it appears, and shall be in lines ical derivatives of substances specified in generally parallel to the base on which section 502(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, the package rests as it is designed to be and Cosmetic Act. displayed. (e) For a product to state in its label- Subpart BÐLabeling ing that it is ``alcohol free,'' it must 329.10 Labeling requirements for habit- contain no alcohol (0 percent). forming drugs. (f) For any OTC drug product in- tended for oral ingestion containing Subpart CÐExemptions over 5 percent alcohol and labeled for use by adults and children 12 years of 329.20 Exemption of certain habit-forming age and over, the labeling shall contain drugs from prescription requirements. the following statement in the direc- AUTHORITY: 21 U.S.C. 352, 353, 355, 371. tions section: ``Consult a physician for use in children under 12 years of age.'' SOURCE: 39 FR 11736, Mar. 29, 1974, unless (g) For any OTC drug product in- otherwise noted. tended for oral ingestion containing over 0.5 percent alcohol and labeled for Subpart AÐDerivatives use by children ages 6 to under 12 years Designated as Habit Forming of age, the labeling shall contain the following statement in the directions § 329.1 Habit-forming drugs which are section: ``Consult a physician for use in chemical derivatives of substances children under 6 years of age.'' specified in section 502(d) of the (h) When the direction regarding age Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section Act. -
Prohibited Drugs/Medications in Treatment
Fourth Judicial Circuit Problem-Solving Courts Prohibited Drugs, Medications, and Substances The list below provides an example of substances and medications that are prohibited in the Problem Solving Courts within the Fourth Judicial Circuit. This is not a complete list. For further clarification of any drug and/or medication not listed please contact the Problem-Solving Courts Office at 904-255-1040. Maintaining a drug free lifestyle is very important in the recovery process. Participants are prohibited from using illegal drugs and alcohol (in any form) and must have over the counter or prescribed medications approved prior to purchasing or ingesting. Any and all “designer stimulants/drugs” that can be purchased legally or illegally are strictly prohibited. Any and all “smoking mixtures” (other than products specifically designated to contain only tobacco- for Adults only) are strictly prohibited. Any and all products sold or marketed under false pretenses with the warning “not for human consumption” are strictly prohibited. Using and/or being in possession of any substance intended to replace an otherwise illegal/prohibited substance is strictly prohibited and may result in immediate expulsion from the program. Examples of Examples of substances prohibited in ALL Problem-Solving Court Programs. For medications, Prohibited Substances/ the brand name is in ( ) if the generic name is also listed. Many over the counter medications Medication Classifications are also listed. For illicit drugs, examples of “street” names are included. Alcohol