EMC Inquiry Into Electronic Voting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EMC Inquiry Into Electronic Voting PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA Electoral Matters Committee Inquiry into electronic voting Parliament of Victoria Electoral Matters Committee Ordered to be published VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER May 2017 PP No 284, Session 2014‑17 ISBN 978 1 925458 72 5 (print version) 978 1 925458 73 2 (PDF version) Committee functions The Electoral Matters Committee is constituted under section 9A of the Parliamentary Committees Act 2003. The committee’s functions are to inquire into, consider and report to the Parliament on any proposal, matter or thing concerned with: a. the conduct of parliamentary elections and referendums in Victoria; b. the conduct of elections of Councillors under the Local Government Act 1989; and c. the administration of, or practices associated with, the Electoral Act 2002 and any other law relating to electoral matters. Inquiry into electronic voting iii Committee membership Hon Louise Asher MP Ms Ros Spence MP Chair Deputy Chair Brighton Yuroke Ms Lizzie Blandthorn MP Hon Martin Dixon MP Hon Russell Northe MP Pascoe Vale Nepean Morwell Ms Fiona Patten MLC Hon Adem Somyurek MLC Northern Metropolitan South‑Eastern Metropolitan Inquiry into electronic voting v Committee secretariat Staff Mark Roberts, Executive Officer Nathaniel Reader, Research Officer Bernadette Pendergast, Committee Administration Officer, Mondays and Tuesdays Maria Marasco, Committee Administration Officer, Wednesdays and Thursdays Committee contact details Address Electoral Matters Committee Parliament of Victoria, Spring Street EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002 Phone 61 3 8682 2885 Email [email protected] Web www.parliament.vic.gov.au/emc This report is available on the Committee’s website. vi Electoral Matters Committee Contents Preliminaries Committee functions iii Committee membership v Committee secretariat vi Terms of reference xi Chair’s foreword xiii Recommendations xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Terms of reference – Inquiry into electronic voting 1 1.2 Responsibilities of the Electoral Matters Committee 1 1.3 The Electoral Matters Committee’s previous inquiries 1 1.4 Inquiry process 2 1.4.1 Submissions 3 1.4.2 Public hearings 5 1.4.3 Briefings 6 1.4.4 Site visits 6 1.5 Data analysis 8 1.6 Report outline 8 2 Background to the inquiry — electronic voting and election technology at Victorian state elections 9 2.1 Definitions 10 2.1.1 Electronic voting 10 2.2 Electronic voting in Victoria 13 2.2.1 History 13 2.2.2 Franchise 15 2.2.3 Statistics and voter satisfaction 16 2.2.4 How it works 17 2.2.5 Electronic voting and source codes – technical aspects 18 2.2.6 Postal voting – email delivery of ballot material 18 2.3 Technology and Victorian electoral administration 19 2.3.1 Enrolment 19 2.3.2 Computer counting of Legislative Council ballot papers 22 2.3.3 Communication 23 2.3.4 Election management – EMS 24 2.3.5 How the VEC provides services to political parties 24 2.4 The Parliament of Victoria and electronic voting 25 2.5 Chapter conclusion 27 Inquiry into electronic voting vii Contents 3 Electronic voting and election technology in Australia 29 3.1 History of electronic voting in Australia 30 3.1.1 Timeline of electronic voting in Australia – key events 30 3.2 Major drivers of electronic voting in Australian electoral administration 35 3.2.1 Social change 35 3.2.2 Australian households, the Internet and mobile phone technology 36 3.2.3 Population mobility and geographic change 37 3.2.4 Challenges associated with the postal service, and postal voting in general 38 3.2.5 2013 and 2016 federal elections, calls for electronic voting 39 3.2.6 ‘No major crisis’ concept, or path dependency 41 3.3 Arguments for and against electronic voting, focusing on remote voting 41 3.3.1 Arguments for electronic voting 42 3.3.2 Arguments against electronic voting 46 3.4 Electronic voting and election technology in Australia 51 3.4.1 Federal elections 52 3.4.2 Australian Capital Territory 53 3.4.3 New South Wales – iVote 56 3.4.4 Queensland 62 3.4.5 South Australia 63 3.4.6 Western Australia 63 3.4.7 Tasmania 63 3.4.8 Northern Territory 64 4 Electronic voting in international jurisdictions 65 4.1 Estonia 65 4.1.1 Organisations with whom the committee met 65 4.1.2 Estonia’s electoral system 65 4.1.3 History of electronic voting in Estonia 67 4.2 Denmark 72 4.2.1 Organisations with whom the committee met 72 4.2.2 Denmark’s electoral system 72 4.2.3 Discussion about electronic voting in Denmark 73 4.3 United Kingdom 74 4.3.1 Organisations with whom the committee met 74 4.3.2 The UK’s electoral system 74 4.3.3 Advance voting and postal voting 75 4.3.4 Electronic voting pilots 75 4.3.5 Speaker’s Commission on Digital Democracy 76 4.3.6 Attitudes towards electronic voting 76 viii Electoral Matters Committee Contents 4.4 United States of America 77 4.4.1 Organisations with whom the committee met 77 4.4.2 US electoral system 78 4.4.3 Electronic voting in the United States 78 4.4.4 Meeting with Electoral Assistance Commission 80 4.4.5 Meeting with Alexandria City 81 4.4.6 Arlington County Board of Elections 83 4.4.7 Fairfax County Board of Elections 86 4.4.8 New York State Board of Elections 88 4.4.9 Brennan Centre for Justice 89 4.5 New Zealand 91 4.5.1 Local government trials 91 4.5.2 Electoral participation at New Zealand elections 93 5 Electronic voting and election technology in Victoria; evidence and proposals 95 5.1 Remote electronic voting 96 5.1.1 Proposals for remote voting – adopting iVote 96 5.1.2 Proposals for remote voting – iVote ‘modified’ 104 5.1.3 Proposals for remote voting – do not adopt iVote 105 5.1.4 Specific evidence about remote voting systems 106 5.1.5 Security and ballot design concerns 121 5.1.6 Contact details of electronic voters 123 5.1.7 Alternative electronic voting systems 123 5.1.8 Specific evidence about electoral participation and electronic voting 124 5.2 Expanding kiosk voting 131 5.2.1 Expanding vVote 132 5.3 Election technology at Victorian state elections 137 5.3.1 Electronic roll mark off in Victoria 137 5.3.2 Electronic ballot paper scanning 139 Appendices 1 List of submissions 141 2 Public Hearings 143 3 Domestic site visits 145 4 New Zealand site visits 147 5 International site visits 149 6 Electoral Matters Committee reports and discussion papers 151 Inquiry into electronic voting ix Terms of reference Inquiry into electronic voting Received from the Legislative Assembly on 7 October 2015: That, under s33 of the Parliamentary Committees Act 2003, an inquiry be referred to the Electoral Matters Committee for consideration and report no later than 30 April 2017 on: 1. the forms of electronic voting currently utilised in Victoria and other jurisdictions and their effectiveness; and 2. alternatives that are available that if implemented would ensure the continued integrity and security of the electronic voting system. Inquiry into electronic voting xi Chair’s foreword I am pleased to present the Electoral Matters Committee’s report on its enquiry into electronic voting to the Victorian Parliament. The Committee received a reference from the Government on electronic voting in the context of significant community interest in this matter. The Committee advertised its enquiry and held a series of public hearings, where State Electoral Commissions, experts in technology and other interested parties further explained their submissions. The Committee is indebted to all of those who made submissions and is most appreciative of those who were prepared to appear before the Committee at our public hearings to provide further details of their experience and knowledge. I wish to thank the Deputy Chair of the Electoral Matters Committee, Ros Spence, and the other members of the Electoral Matters Committee – Martin Dixon, Russell Northe, Adem Somyurek, Lizzie Blandthorn and Fiona Patten. The Victorian Parliament is fortunate to have Committee members who are so engaged in all aspects of the Committee’s work. The Committee had to consider two competing forces as a consequence of this enquiry. Firstly, the Committee is aware of a significant and growing desire across the voting public for electronic voting. Secondly, the Committee received overwhelming evidence that it is extremely difficult to guarantee the security of votes lodged electronically. Whilst the simplistic view is frequently put that if members of the public can conduct their banking with confidence online, then similarly members of the public should be able to cast their votes online. However, the expert evidence gathered by the Committee advised that the success to banking online is guaranteed by linking the name of the person doing the banking and the transaction. In our democracy, a secret ballot is a fundamental right of every individual in Australia and that this severed link between the person casting a vote and the ability of the system to check it, makes electronic voting a far more difficult technical proposition. However, the Committee is also conscious of the fact that the postal system, on which we will rely for postal votes for the next State election in 2018, is a vastly different postal system from the one that operated decades ago. The enquiry also took place during the 2016 Federal Election and during the 2016 Census. While both the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition called for electronic voting immediately after the delay in obtaining the Federal Election result, both Members of Parliament and the public shortly thereafter experienced the 2016 Australian Census which demonstrated the problems that could arise over an electronic approach, certainly an electronic approach over an entire project.
Recommended publications
  • November A&T 2012.Pub
    Building Activity On The Rise In Manawatū according to Statistics New Zealand data for October which shows the value of residential building consents in Manawatū is on the increase with residential building consents valued at $25.5 million during the last quarter (end of August) up 13% for the same period last year. Although residential building consents were down 3% in Palmerston North, consents for additions and alterations totalled $2.2 million, which is an increase of 17% compared to the same period last year. Palmerston North Mayor Jono Naylor said that the increase was a sign of recovery in building activity and a big positive for the City and the region. “While the growth in new housing is not happening, residents are choosing to spend money on renovating their homes which is good for local economy.” Graph Source: Manawatu Monthly Economic Update—September 2012 using Stascs NZ data The total Manawatū District residential consent values of $9.4 million in the three months to August, an increase of 45% in the three months to August. Source: Press Release: Palmerston North City Council 2 October 2012 Palmerston North is set to go metropolitan in about five years' time when it is projected to be home to more than 90,000 people. The latest population projections from Statistics New Zealand show the city is the fifth-equal fastest growing area in New Zealand. Mayor Jono Naylor said Palmerston North had already joined Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ's) metropolitan group, as it was already close to the mark at 85,100 and had more issues in common with the major centres than other provincial cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Central Districts Newsletter Nov - Jan 2017
    MS CENTRAL DISTRICTS NEWSLETTER NOV - JAN 2017 ANNUAL APPEAL DAY, 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2016 Many thanks to all our collectors and helpers for our Annual Ap- peal Day 2016… with a total of $7,600 of funds raised this was a huge effort! Inside this issue: Our thanks also to these Lions Clubs - Dannevirke, Norsewood, PN Heartland, & Papaioea Rose City who all helped us out this President report 2 year collecting as well! Please see pics on pages of some of our collectors in the region. From the Field Worker’s 3 CHRISTMAS CLOSURE DATES - MSCD Office Annual Appeal Day Pics 4 –5 will be closed from Art Exhibition Pics 6 21st December 2016 - 9th January 2017 MFML Course 7 Multiple Sclerosis Awareness Please find below a link to video 1 of 3 that MSNZ and MS Christmas Message 8 Auckland have been working on over recent months to help show what MS means to people diagnosed. This is the first of 3 videos Maintenance Therapy Pro- 9 which we will be releasing over coming months. - grammes https://youtu.be/-6eraH6mIXI Brain Fog Explained 10 Christmas lunches/dinners 11-12 IMPORTANT DATES TO REMEMBER! Food Together / Joke Cor- 13 ner Regional Christmas Lunches - usual scheduled dates, Notice Board 14 except for Otaki and Levin (see Pg 18) MSCD - The Gathering Xmas Dinner - 19 November Useful Information 15 Levin Ladies Shopping Day - 1st December, 10.00am Subs/Donations Form 16 Recipes 17 DISCLAIMER: THE VIEWS AND EXPRESSED IN THIS NEWSLETTER ARE THOSE OF MSCD Maint. Therapy / 18-19 THE AUTHORS AND NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MS CENTRAL DISTRICTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Reform 2013 and Beyond 8Apr2013
    8 APRIL 2013 LOCAL GOVERNMENT NEW ZEALAND SUBMISSION In the matter of the discussion document: Freshwater reform 2013 and beyond. To the Ministry for the Environment 1 Submission by Local Government New Zealand IN THE MATTER OF: Freshwater reform 2013 and beyond To the Ministry for the Environment 8 APRIL 2013 Introduction 1. Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) welcomes the opportunity to submit on the Discussion document: Freshwater reform 2013 and beyond. 2. LGNZ wishes to engage further with Minsters and officials on this submission. 3. LGNZ is a member-based organisation representing all 78 local authorities in New Zealand. LGNZ’s governance body is the National Council. The members of the National Council are: . Lawrence Yule, President, Mayor, Hastings District Council . John Forbes, Vice-President, Mayor, Opotiki District Council . John Bain, Zone 1, Deputy Chair, Northland Regional Council . Richard Northey, Zone 1, Councillor, Auckland Council . Meng Foon, Zone 2, Mayor, Gisborne District Council . Jono Naylor, Zone 3, Mayor, Palmerston North City Council . Adrienne Staples, Zone 4, Mayor, South Wairarapa District Council . Maureen Pugh, Zone 5, Mayor, Westland District Council . Tracy Hicks, Zone 6, Mayor, Gore District Council . Len Brown, Metro Sector, Mayor, Auckland Council . Dave Cull, Metro Sector, Mayor, Dunedin City Council . Stuart Crosby, Metro Sector, Mayor, Tauranga City Council . Brendan Duffy, Provincial Sector, Mayor, Horowhenua District Council . Stephen Woodhead, Regional Sector, Chair, Otago Regional Council . Fran Wilde, Regional Sector, Chair, Greater Wellington Regional Council. 4. This submission has been prepared under the direction of the National Council. Councils may choose to make individual submissions. The LGNZ submission does not derogate from these individual submissions.
    [Show full text]
  • National Spokespeople Chart (190118)
    LEADER DEPUTY LEADER SIMON BRIDGES PAULA BENNETT AMY ADAMS KANWAL SINGH BAKSHI MAGGIE BARRY ANDREW BAYLY DAVID BENNETT DAN BIDOIS CHRIS BISHOP SIMEON BROWN Tauranga • National Upper Harbour Selwyn • Finance List MP • Internal Affairs North Shore • Seniors Hunua • Building and Hamilton East Northcote Hutt South Pakuranga Security and Social Investment & Social Shadow Attorney-General Assoc. Justice Veterans • Assoc. Health Construction • Revenue Corrections Assoc. Workplace Relations Police • Youth Assoc. Education • Assoc. Tertiary Intelligence Services • Drug Reform • Women Assoc. Finance Land Information and Safety Education, Skills & Employment Assoc. Infrastructure GERRY BROWNLEE DAVID CARTER JUDITH COLLINS JACQUI DEAN MATT DOOCEY SARAH DOWIE ANDREW FALLOON PAUL GOLDSMITH NATHAN GUY JO HAYES Ilam • Shadow Leader of List MP Papakura • Housing & Urban Waitaki Waimakariri Invercargill Rangitata • Regional List MP • Economic & Regional Otaki • Agriculture List MP • Whānau Ora the House • GCSB • NZSIS State-Owned Enterprises Development • Infrastructure Local Government Mental Health Conservation Development (South Island) Development • Transport Biosecurity • Food Safety Māori Education America’s Cup Planning (RMA Reform) Small Business Junior Whip Assoc. Arts, Culture & Heritage HARETE HIPANGO BRETT HUDSON NIKKI KAYE MATT KING NUK KORAKO BARBARA KURIGER DENISE LEE MELISSA LEE AGNES LOHENI TIM MACINDOE Whanganui List MP • Commerce & Auckland Central Northland List MP • Māori Development Taranaki - King Country Maungakiekie List MP • Broadcasting,
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Constitutional Review Charles Chauval
    AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP Annual Conference, Darwin 3-5 October 2012 “Constitutions – reviewed, revised and adapted” * * * * Paper by New Zealand MPs Charles Chauvel and Louise Upston “The New Zealand Constitutional Review” New Zealand is undertaking a constitutional review which stemmed from the confidence and supply agreement between the National Party and Maori Party after the November 2008 general election. A final report summarising the views of New Zealanders on constitutional issues will be submitted to the Cabinet by the end of 2013 and the Government then has six months in which to respond. A linking project is the Independent Review of MMP being undertaken by the Electoral Commission which will make its final proposals to the Minister of Justice by 31 October 2012. Background A constitution can be seen as the rules about how we live together as a country. Unlike most other countries, New Zealand does not have a law called “The Constitution.” Instead, the rules for how the country is governed are in what is often called an unwritten constitution. Most of it is in fact written down in various laws, rules, and practices - just not in a single document. Important elements of our constitution include: Laws passed by New Zealand‟s Parliament such as the Constitution Act 1986, the Electoral Act 1993 and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 British laws adopted by New Zealand through the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988, for example the Magna Carta. ASPG: Charles Chauvel MP & Louise Upston MP Darwin, Australia: 3&5 October 2012 Page 1 The powers of our head of state, the Queen (or King) – for example the power to appoint the Governor-General, whose role is established by the Letters Patent Constituting the Office of Governor-General.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Contributions – Discussion Paper to the Department of Internal Affairs
    22 MARCH 2013 LOCAL GOVERNMENT NEW ZEALAND SUBMISSION Development Contributions – Discussion Paper To the Department of Internal Affairs 11 MARCH 2013 1 Submission by Local government New Zealand IN THE MATTER OF: Development Contributions Review – Discussion Document To the Department of Internal Affairs 11 MARCH 2013 Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Development Contributions Review ................................................................................................................ 6 Local government in New Zealand view of the current situation ........................................................ 5 Examining the issues ............................................................................................................................ 6 Option Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Option1 -Improved Guidance ............................................................................................................... 7 Option 2- Existing Local Government Act provisions ............................................................................ 8 Option 3 - Discounts for housing types................................................................................................. 8 Option 4 - New purpose and principles provision for development contribution….............................8
    [Show full text]
  • 23. Explaining the Results
    23. Explaining the Results Antony Green Labor came to office in 2007 with its strongest hold on government in the nation’s history—it was, for the first time, in office nationally and in every state and territory. Six years later Labor left national office with its lowest first preference vote in a century. For only the third time since the First World War, a governing party failed to win a third term in office. From a clean sweep of governments in 2007, by mid-2014 Labor’s last bastions were minority governments in South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory.1 Based on the national two-party-preferred vote, Labor’s 2013 result was less disastrous than previous post-war lows in 1966, 1975, 1977 and 1996. Labor also bettered those four elections on the proportion of House seats won. The two-party-preferred swing of 3.6 percentage points was also small for a change of government election, equal to the swing that defeated the Fraser Government in 1983 but smaller than those suffered by Whitlam in 1975, Keating in 1996 and Howard in 2007. Even over two elections from 2007 to 2013, the two-party- preferred swing of 6.2 percentage points was below that suffered by Labor previously over two elections (1961–66 and 1972–75), and smaller than the swing against the Coalition between 1977 and 1983. By the measure of first preference vote share, the 2013 election was a dreadful result for Labor, its lowest vote share since 1904.2 Labor’s vote share slid from 43.4 per cent in 2007 to 38.0 per cent in 2010 and 33.4 per cent in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Box Voting Ballot Tampering in the 21St Century
    This free internet version is available at www.BlackBoxVoting.org Black Box Voting — © 2004 Bev Harris Rights reserved to Talion Publishing/ Black Box Voting ISBN 1-890916-90-0. You can purchase copies of this book at www.Amazon.com. Black Box Voting Ballot Tampering in the 21st Century By Bev Harris Talion Publishing / Black Box Voting This free internet version is available at www.BlackBoxVoting.org Contents © 2004 by Bev Harris ISBN 1-890916-90-0 Jan. 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form whatsoever except as provided for by U.S. copyright law. For information on this book and the investigation into the voting machine industry, please go to: www.blackboxvoting.org Black Box Voting 330 SW 43rd St PMB K-547 • Renton, WA • 98055 Fax: 425-228-3965 • [email protected] • Tel. 425-228-7131 This free internet version is available at www.BlackBoxVoting.org Black Box Voting © 2004 Bev Harris • ISBN 1-890916-90-0 Dedication First of all, thank you Lord. I dedicate this work to my husband, Sonny, my rock and my mentor, who tolerated being ignored and bored and galled by this thing every day for a year, and without fail, stood fast with affection and support and encouragement. He must be nuts. And to my father, who fought and took a hit in Germany, who lived through Hitler and saw first-hand what can happen when a country gets suckered out of democracy. And to my sweet mother, whose an- cestors hosted a stop on the Underground Railroad, who gets that disapproving look on her face when people don’t do the right thing.
    [Show full text]
  • To the Productivity Commission
    11 MARCH 2013 LOCAL GOVERNMENT NEW ZEALAND SUBMISSION Towards Better Local Regulation To the Productivity Commission 1 Submission by Local Government New Zealand IN THE MATTER OF: TOWARDS BETTER LOCAL REGULATION Page 2 of 19 TowardsTo Betterthe Local Productivity Regulation - LGNZ Submission Commission Our ref: EN 21-20 11 MARCH 2013 Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Productivity Review Report “Towards better local regulation.” ................................................................... 6 Local government in New Zealand ....................................................................................................... 6 Diversity across local authorities .......................................................................................................... 7 Allocating regulatory responsibilities ................................................................................................... 7 The funding of regulation ..................................................................................................................... 8 Regulation making by local government .............................................................................................. 9 Local government cooperation ........................................................................................................... 10 Local authorities as regulators............................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • National Party Spokesperson Allocations July 2020
    National Party Spokesperson Allocations July 2020 Spokesperson for Hon Judith Collins National Security Leader Hon Gerry Brownlee NZSIS Deputy Leader GCSB Covid-19 Border Response Hon Paul Goldsmith Finance Earthquake Commission Hon Simon Bridges Foreign Affairs Justice Dr Shane Reti Health Hon Todd McClay Economic Development Tourism Chris Bishop Infrastructure Transport Shadow Leader of the House Todd Muller Trade Hon Louise Upston Social Development Social Investment Hon Scott Simpson Environment Climate Change Planning (RMA reform) Hon David Bennett Agriculture Hon Michael Woodhouse Regional Economic Development Pike River re-entry Deputy Shadow Leader of the House Nicola Willis Education Early Childhood Education Hon Jacqui Dean Housing and Urban Development Conservation Hon Mark Mitchell Defence & Disarmament Sport & Recreation Melissa Lee Broadcasting Communications and Digital Media Data and Cyber-security Andrew Bayly Revenue Commerce State-Owned Enterprises Associate Finance Small Business and Manufacturing Hon. Dr Nick Smith State Services Electoral Law Reform Drug Reform Hon Alfred Ngaro Pacific Peoples Community and Voluntary Children and Disability Issues Barbara Kuriger Senior Whip Food Safety Rural Communities Women Harete Hipango Shadow Attorney-General Crown-Maori Relations and Treaty Negotiations Māori Tourism Jonathan Young Energy & Resources Arts Culture and Heritage Hon Tim MacIndoe ACC Skills and Employment Seniors Civil Defence Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi Ethnic Communities Associate Justice Matt Doocey Junior Whip Mental
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Perspectives NCDOT, State Parks to Coordinate on Pedestrian, Bike Bridge For
    Starts Tonight Poems Galore •SCHS opens softball play- offs with lop-sided victory Today’s issue includes over Red Springs. •Hornets the winners and win- sweep Jiggs Powers Tour- ning poems of the A.R. nament baseball, softball Ammons Poetry Con- championships. test. See page 1-C. Sports See page 3-A See page 1-B. ThePublished News since 1890 every Monday and Thursday Reporterfor the County of Columbus and her people. Thursday, May 12, 2016 Fresh perspectives County school Volume 125, Number 91 consolidation, Whiteville, North Carolina 75 Cents district merger talks emerge at Inside county meeting 3-A By NICOLE CARTRETTE News Editor •Top teacher pro- motes reading, paren- Columbus County school officials are ex- tal involvement. pected to ask Columbus County Commission- ers Monday to endorse a $70 million plan to consolidate seven schools into three. 4-A The comprehensive study drafted by Szotak •Long-delayed Design of Chapel Hill was among top discus- murder trial sions at the Columbus County Board of Com- set to begin here missioners annual planning session held at Southeastern Community College Tuesday Monday. night. While jobs and economic development, implementation of an additional phase of a Next Issue county salary study, wellness and recreation talks and expansion of natural gas, water and sewer were among topics discussed, the board spent a good portion of the four-hour session talking about school construction. No plans The commissioners tentatively agreed that they had no plans to take action on the propos- al Monday night and hinted at wanting more details about coming to an agreement with Photo by GRANT MERRITT the school board about funding the proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Sector Discussion Document
    Primary Sector Discussion Document HAVE YOUR SAY 2019 DISCUSS national.org.nz nznats nznationalparty Printed on 100% recycled paper Contents Introduction from the Leader 2 Introduction from National’s Primary Sector spokesperson 4 Biosecurity and Food Safety 5 Climate Change 8 Education and Workforce 10 Landcorp 12 Research, Science and Innovation 13 Rural Communities 15 Trade 18 Water Storage 20 Key Primary Sectors 21 Dairy 21 Sheep and Beef 22 Forestry 23 Fisheries and Aquaculture 25 Horticulture 26 Racing 28 Questions and feedback 29 2 Primary Sector Introduction from National Party Leader Simon Bridges We’re lucky in New Zealand to have an efficient, basis of this document. This will be the third profitable and productive primary sector as the in our line of discussion documents released backbone of our economy. I know from my time this year after our Environment document and as Minister for Economic Development just how International Affairs document, both of which important the primary sector is to our financial are already receiving great feedback. wellbeing, and that our engine room needs to be looked after for us to prosper as a nation. We realise farmers are worried about what is National is proud to hold all the rural seats in coming down the pipeline from this Government. New Zealand with the exception of one, and is We’ve seen primary sector business confidence committed to supporting our rural communities plummet on the back of this Government’s with sensible, well-informed policy. policies and the uncertainty about what could be around the corner. Employment law reforms, The current Coalition Government didn’t do the climate change and environmental regulations, hard yards when in Opposition and its answer and the transformation of good pastoral to governing appears to be setting up over 260 farmland being swallowed up by the One Billion working groups rather than implementing policy Trees programme.
    [Show full text]