DOCSLIB.ORG

Gasoline and Price Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gasoline and Price Control GasolineGasoline AndAnd PricePrice ControlControl Janet Ng EEP 142 Spring 05 CurrentCurrent U.S.U.S. RetailRetail GasolineGasoline PricesPrices 4/11/2005 4/18/2005 4/25/2005 Change from Change from week ago year ago States California 2.592 2.584 2.565 -0.019 0.441 Colorado 2.269 2.244 2.217 -0.027 0.386 Florida 2.296 2.277 2.263 -0.014 0.448 Massachusetts 2.172 2.152 2.187 0.035 0.438 Minnesota 2.121 1.997 2.033 0.036 0.272 New York 2.311 2.304 2.309 0.005 0.42 Ohio 2.22 2.066 2.156 0.09 0.376 Texas 2.157 2.131 2.119 -0.012 0.444 Washington 2.442 2.476 2.478 0.002 0.478 Source: Weekly U.S. Retail Gasoline Prices, Regular Grade, 2005 CurrentCurrent U.S.U.S. RetailRetail GasolineGasoline Prices,Prices, contcont’’d.d. Source: Weekly U.S. Retail Gasoline Prices, Regular Grade, 2005 ReasonsReasons forfor IncreasingIncreasing GasolineGasoline PricesPrices OPECOPEC’’ss ShortShort SupplySupply –– bbigig oiloil companiescompanies operateoperate atat tighttight supplysupply andand monopolymonopoly prices.prices. DecreaseDecrease inin U.S.U.S. crudecrude oiloil productionproduction –– productionproduction averagedaveraged 5.45.4 millionmillion barrelsbarrels perper dayday (bbl/d)(bbl/d) duringduring thethe firstfirst tenten monthsmonths ofof 2004,2004, waswas nownow atat 5050--yearyear lows.lows. U.S.U.S. CrudeCrude OilOil ProductionProduction Source: United States Country Analysis Brief, 2005 ReasonsReasons forfor IncreasingIncreasing GasolineGasoline Prices,Prices, contcont’’d.d. StrongStrong consumerconsumer demanddemand -- demanddemand increasedincreased atat nearlynearly 9.29.2 millionmillion bbl/dbbl/d overover thethe lastlast fourfour weeksweeks inin 2004,2004, exceedingexceeding 20032003’’ss demanddemand byby nearlynearly 0.50.5 millionmillion bbl/d.bbl/d. OtherOther factorsfactors -- insurgentinsurgent attacksattacks onon oiloil pipelinespipelines inin thethe MiddleMiddle East,East, andand aa refineryrefinery explosionexplosion nearnear Houston,Houston, Texas,Texas, inin latelate MarchMarch disrupteddisrupted thethe supplysupply chain.chain. 19731973’’ss OilOil CrisisCrisis ReasonsReasons forfor 19731973’’ss OilOil CrisisCrisis StrongStrong consumerconsumer demanddemand -- 36%36% ofof energyenergy consumptionconsumption waswas inin foreignforeign oiloil inin 1973;1973; whilewhile itit hadhad beenbeen 22%22% onlyonly inin 1970.1970. PoliticalPolitical ReasonsReasons -- thethe WatergateWatergate scandalscandal ofof PresidentPresident RichardRichard NixonNixon andand thethe devaluationdevaluation ofof U.S.U.S. dollar.dollar. AA growinggrowing tensiontension betweenbetween U.S.U.S. andand ArabArab countriescountries -- ArabArab--IsraeliIsraeli conflictsconflicts andand thethe YomYom KippurKippur War.War. OPECOPEC’’ss decisiondecision -- reducedreduced supplysupply andand raisedraised oiloil prices.prices. 19731973’’ss OilOil CrisisCrisis -- SomeSome DataData ImportsImports ofof oiloil toto U.S.U.S. droppeddropped fromfrom 66 millionmillion inin SeptemberSeptember 19731973 toto 55 millionmillion inin subsequentsubsequent months.months. TheThe priceprice perper barrelbarrel roserose 130%130% byby DecemberDecember 1973.1973. OilOil embargoembargo endedended inin MarchMarch 18,18, 1974;1974; butbut OPECOPEC continuedcontinued toto raiseraise oiloil prices.prices. OilOil PricePrice ChronologyChronology Source: Energy Information Awareness Graph of Oil Prices 19791979’’ss (Second)(Second) OilOil CrisisCrisis ReasonReason forfor 19791979’’ss OilOil CrisisCrisis TheThe IranianIranian RevolutionRevolution -- anotheranother shockshock camecame inin 19781978 toto 19791979 whenwhen thethe newnew ShahShah ofof IranIran cutcut offoff oiloil production.production. GovernmentGovernment’’ss ActionsActions TheThe U.S.U.S. GovernmentGovernment setset maximummaximum pricesprices forfor gasolinegasoline inin 19731973 andand 19791979 inin responseresponse toto thethe decreasedecrease inin thethe supplysupply ofof gasolinegasoline byby OPEC.OPEC. AA priceprice controlcontrol (and(and rationing)rationing) werewere imposedimposed onon gasoline;gasoline; dealersdealers soldsold gasgas onon aa firstfirst--comecome--firstfirst-- servedserved basis.basis. PricePrice ControlControl onon GasolineGasoline RentRent DissipationDissipation SellersSellers couldcould capturecapture somesome ofof thethe nonnon--exclusiveexclusive incomeincome by:by: CuttingCutting thethe businessbusiness hourshours -- provideprovide dayday--timetime serviceservice insteadinstead ofof 2424--hourhour service.service. LoweringLowering gasolinegasoline qualityquality -- sellsell gasolinegasoline ofof lowerlower octaneoctane rating,rating, whichwhich incurincur aa lowerlower productionproduction cost.cost. ReducingReducing servicesservices providedprovided withwith thethe gasolinegasoline -- changechange fromfrom fullfull--serviceservice toto selfself--serviceservice oror nono--service.service. DemandDemand maymay bebe lowerlower duedue toto thethe aboveabove measurersmeasurers andand totaltotal dissipationdissipation reduces.reduces. NoNo PricePrice ControlControl inin CurrentCurrent PeriodPeriod DeadweightDeadweight lossloss oror rentrent dissipation.dissipation. RisingRising gasolinegasoline pricesprices leadlead toto economiceconomic growth?growth? ExampleExample ofof GermanyGermany inin thethe 1990s.1990s. GermanyGermany facedfaced aa crudecrude oiloil priceprice increaseincrease ofof 211%211% betweenbetween thethe fourthfourth quarterquarter ofof 19981998 andand thirdthird quarterquarter ofof 2000;2000; sheshe experiencedexperienced economiceconomic growthgrowth withwith fallingfalling unemploymentunemployment andand inflation.inflation. OurOur ActionsActions CarpoolCarpool -- savessaves moneymoney andand helpshelps reducereduce traffictraffic congestioncongestion andand pollution.pollution. UseUse publicpublic transportationtransportation -- reducesreduces transportationtransportation costscosts upup toto $1500?$1500? ServiceService thethe vehiclevehicle regularlyregularly -- improvesimproves mileage,mileage, reducesreduces emissions,emissions, improvesimproves vehiclevehicle safety,safety, andand addsadds yearsyears toto thethe lifelife ofof aa car.car. ChooseChoose aa fuelfuel--efficientefficient vehiclevehicle ifif possible.possible. ConclusionConclusion AA fallfall inin oiloil priceprice willwill happenhappen onlyonly ifif wewe havehave aa decreasedecrease inin demanddemand andand anan increaseincrease inin supply.supply. AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements EIA.EIA. WeeklyWeekly U.S.U.S. RetailRetail GasolineGasoline Prices,Prices, RegularRegular GradeGrade.. 2005.2005. 66 MayMay 20052005 <http://<http://www.eia.doe.govwww.eia.doe.gov// oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_hooil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_ho me_page.htmlme_page.html>.>. ----------.. UnitedUnited StatesStates ofof AmericaAmerica.. 2005.2005. 33 MayMay 20052005 <http://<http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/usa.htmlwww.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/usa.html>.>. Eland,Eland, Ivan.Ivan. HaveHave 1,0001,000 U.S.U.S. SoulsSouls DiedDied forfor Oil?Oil?.. 2004.2004. 33 MayMay 20052005 <http://<http://www.independent.orgwww.independent.org// newsroom/newsroom/article.asp?idarticle.asp?id=1362>.=1362>. WikipediaWikipedia.. EnergyEnergy CrisisCrisis.. 2005.2005. 22 MayMay 20052005 <http://<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_crisisen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_crisis>.>..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Armadollar-Petrodollar Coalition and the Middle East
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Rowley, Robin; Bichler, Shimshon; Nitzan, Jonathan Working Paper The Armadollar-Petrodollar Coalition and the Middle East Working Papers, Department of Economics, McGill University, No. 10/89 Provided in Cooperation with: The Bichler & Nitzan Archives Suggested Citation: Rowley, Robin; Bichler, Shimshon; Nitzan, Jonathan (1989) : The Armadollar-Petrodollar Coalition and the Middle East, Working Papers, Department of Economics, McGill University, No. 10/89, The Bichler and Nitzan Archives, Toronto, http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/134/ This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/157847 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an
    [Show full text]
  • Britain, British Petroleum, Shell and the Remaking of the International Oil Industry, 1957-1979
    Empires of Energy: Britain, British Petroleum, Shell and the Remaking of the International Oil Industry, 1957-1979 Author: Jonathan Robert Kuiken Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104079 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2013 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of History EMPIRES OF ENERGY: BRITAIN, BRITISH PETROLEUM, SHELL AND THE REMAKING OF THE INTERNATIONAL OIL INDUSTRY, 1957-1979 [A dissertation by] JONATHAN R. KUIKEN submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2013 © copyright by JONATHAN ROBERT KUIKEN 2013 Empires of Energy: Britain, British Petroleum, Shell and the remaking of the international oil industry, 1957-1979 Jonathan R. Kuiken Dissertation Advisor - James E. Cronin Dissertation Abstract This dissertation examines British oil policy from the aftermath of the Suez Crisis in 1956-1957 until the Iranian Revolution and the electoral victory of Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative Party in 1979. It was a period marked by major transitions within Britain’s oil policy as well as broader changes within the international oil market. It argues that the story of Britain, and Britain’s two domestically-based oil companies, BP and Shell, offers a valuable case study in the development of competing ideas about the reorganization of the international oil industry in the wake of the rise of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting countries and the companies’ losing control over the production of oil.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1973 Oil Embargo Arab Oil Diplomacy
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-1980 The 1973 Oil Embargo Arab Oil Diplomacy Amal Mustafa Shamma Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Shamma, Amal Mustafa, "The 1973 Oil Embargo Arab Oil Diplomacy" (1980). Master's Theses. 1930. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1930 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE 1973 OIL EMBARGO ARAB OIL DIPLOMACY Amal Mustafa Shamma A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Political Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December, 1980 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE 1973 OIL EMBARGO ARAB OIL DIPLOMACY Araal Mustafa Shamma, M.A. Western Michigan University, 1980 1 The Arah oil producing countries, following years of a stalemate in the Arab-Israeli dispute,- decided to put their oil resource in the service of the Arab cause using it as an instrument of pressure against the West. Their objective was to induce a change in the Western world Middle East policy and to work toward achieving a lasting and peaceful solution for the Arab-Israeli problem. The purpose of this thesis is to show that the ap­ plication of Arab oil diplomacy has been effective into producing a more even handed policy in the area, and into breaking the deadlock in the search for peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Automobile Fuel Efficiency and Synthetic Fuels: Alternatives for Reducing Oil Imports
    Increased Automobile Fuel Efficiency and Synthetic Fuels: Alternatives for Reducing Oil Imports September 1982 NTIS order #PB83-126094 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 82-600603 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Foreword This report presents the findings of an assessment requested by the Senate Com- mittee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. The study assesses and compares increased automobile fuel efficiency and synthetic fuels production with respect to their potential to reduce conventional oil consumption, and their costs and impacts. Con- servation and fuel switching as a means of reducing stationary oil uses are also con- sidered, but in considerably less detail, in order to enable estimates of plausible future oil imports. We are grateful for the assistance of the project advisory panels and the many other people who provided advice, information, and reviews. It should be understood, how- ever, that OTA assumes full responsibility for this report, which does not necessarily represent the views of individual members of the advisory panels. Director Automobile Fuel Efficiency Advisory Panel Michael J. Rabins, Chairman Wayne State University Maudine R. Cooper* John B. Heywood National Urban League, Inc. Massachusetts Institute of Technology John Ferron John Holden National Automobile Dealers Association Ford Motor Co. Donald Friedman Maryann N. Keller Minicar, Inc. Paine, Webber, Mitchell, & Hutchins Herbert Fuhrman Paul Larsen National Institute for GMC Truck and Coach Division Automobile Service Excellence Robert D. Nell James M. Gill Consumers Union The Ethyl Corp. Kenneth Orski R. Eugene Goodson** German Marshall Fund of the United States Hoover Universal, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Foreign Policy (Special Reference After the 25Th of January Revolution)
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS POLÍTICAS Y SOCIOLOGÍA DEPARTAMENTO DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PÚBLICO Y RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES TESIS DOCTORAL Egyptian foreign policy (special reference after The 25th of January Revolution) MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTORA PRESENTADA POR Rania Ahmed Hemaid DIRECTOR Najib Abu-Warda Madrid, 2018 © Rania Ahmed Hemaid, 2017 UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID Facultad de Ciencias Políticas Y Socioligía Departamento de Derecho Internacional Público y Relaciones Internacionales Doctoral Program Political Sciences PHD dissertation Egyptian Foreign Policy (Special Reference after The 25th of January Revolution) POLÍTICA EXTERIOR EGIPCIA (ESPECIAL REFERENCIA DESPUÉS DE LA REVOLUCIÓN DEL 25 DE ENERO) Elaborated by Rania Ahmed Hemaid Under the Supervision of Prof. Dr. Najib Abu- Warda Professor of International Relations in the Faculty of Information Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid Madrid, 2017 Ph.D. Dissertation Presented to the Complutense University of Madrid for obtaining the doctoral degree in Political Science by Ms. Rania Ahmed Hemaid, under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Najib Abu- Warda Professor of International Relations, Faculty of Information Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid. University: Complutense University of Madrid. Department: International Public Law and International Relations (International Studies). Program: Doctorate in Political Science. Director: Prof. Dr. Najib Abu- Warda. Academic Year: 2017 Madrid, 2017 DEDICATION Dedication To my dearest parents may god rest their souls in peace and to my only family my sister whom without her support and love I would not have conducted this piece of work ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Prof. Dr. Najib Abu- Warda for the continuous support of my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Poisoned by Gas: Institutional Failure, Energy Dependency, and Security
    POISONED BY GAS: INSTITUTIONAL FAILURE, ENERGY DEPENDENCY, AND SECURITY EMILY J. HOLLAND SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 EMILY J. HOLLAND ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT POISONED BY GAS: INSTITUTIONAL FAILURE, ENERGY DEPENDENCY, AND SECURITY EMILY J. HOLLAND Many states lack domestic access to crucial energy supplies and must deal with the challenge of formulating an energy security policy that informs their relations with energy producing states. While secure and uninterrupted access to energy is crucial to state security and welfare, some states fail to implement energy security policies and remain dangerously dependent on a foreign supplier. In the post-Soviet region many states even actively resist attempts by the European Union and others to diversify their supplies. Why and under what conditions do states pursue energy security? Conversely, why do some highly dependent states fail to maximize their security vis-à-vis a dominant supplier? I argue that that to understand the complex nature of energy dependence and security it is necessary to look beyond energy markets to domestic political capture and institutional design. More specifically, I argue that initial reform choices guiding transition had long-lasting affects on the ability to make coherent policy choices. States that did not move away from Soviet era property rights empowered actors with an interest in maintaining the status quo of dependence. Others that instituted de facto democratic property rights to guide their energy transitions were able to block energy veto players and move towards a security maximizing diversification policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armadollar-Petrodollar Coalition and the Middle East
    Department of Economics Working Paper 10/89 THE ARMADOLIAR-PETRODOLLAR COALITION AND THE MIDDLE EAST Robin Rowley, Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan Robin Rowley, McGill University Shimshon Bichler, The Hebrew University Jonathan Nitzan, McGill University, Department of Economics Working Papers are drafts of work in progress and should not be cited without the permission of the authors. Requests for additional copies should be addressed to the authors, care of Department of Economics McGill University 855 Sherbrooke Street, West Montreal, Que. H3A 2T7 Telephone: (514) 398-4850 The financial assistance of le fonds FCAR pour l'aide et le soutien h la recherche is gratefully acknowledged CONTENTS PAGE Abstract ...................................................... 1 . Introduction: The 'Military Bias Paradox' ..................... 2 . Exporting Institutional Waste ................................. 2.1 The Era of Arms Exports .................................. 2.2 Global Income Redistribution and Armament Markets ........ 3 . The Seven Sisters and Middle East Oil: From Access Rights to Pricing Might ........................... 3.1 The 'Free Flow' Era ...................................... 3.2 Toward a 'Limited Flow' .................................. 4. The Armadollar-Petrodollar Coalition .......................... 4.1 Armadollar-Petrodollar Cycles ............................ 4.2 Armaprofits. Petroprofits and the Coalition .............. 4.3 The Armadollar-Petrodollar Coalition and U.S. Foreign Policy in the 1970s ....................
    [Show full text]
  • The 1973 Oil Crisis by Sarah Horton
    The 1973 Oil Crisis By Sarah Horton In October of 1973 Middle-eastern OPEC nations stopped exports to the US and other western nations. They meant to punish the western nations that supported Israel, their foe, in the Yom Kippur War, but they also realized the strong influence that they had on the world through oil. One of the many results of the embargo was higher oil prices all throughout the western world, particularly in America. The embargo forced America to consider many things about energy, such as the cost and supply, which up to 1973 no one had worried about (Spiegelman). In order to understand the main cause of the oil crisis one must first know the history of the region and the Arab- Israeli conflict. World War II a Zionist state, known as Israel, was created on 56% of the land that was formerly known as Palestine. This state served as a homeland for Jews. The local Arabs were enraged by the fact that the Palestinian land had been taken to create this state. They refused to acknowledge Israel as an independent state. The Arabs began to launch efforts to recapture the land that they felt was rightfully theirs. This created the Suez-Sinai War. The British and the French sided with the Israelis in order to punish Nasser for nationalizing the Suez Canal. The strong Israeli military forces quickly defeated the Arabs. The Arabs responded to this defeat by uniting. In 1967 Israel launched the Six-Day War, claiming much land. In 1973 Arab forces retaliated. On Yom Kippur, the holiest Jewish holiday, Arab forces attacked, backed by Soviet technology (The Mid-east Oil Crisis).
    [Show full text]
  • US Shale Gas Development What Led to the Boom?
    Date Issue Brief # I S S U E BRIEF US Shale Gas Development What Led to the Boom? Zhongmin Wang and Alan Krupnick May 2013 Issue Brief 13-04 Resources for the Future Resources for the Future is an independent, nonpartisan think tank that, through its social science research, enables policymakers and stakeholders to make better, more informed decisions about energy, environmental, and natural resource issues. Located in Washington, DC, its research scope comprises programs in nations around the world. 2 [AUTHORS] | RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE US Shale Gas Development What Led to the Boom? Zhongmin Wang and Alan Krupnick1 Key Points The shale gas boom resulted from factors that 1. Introduction ultimately enabled firms to produce shale gas In this issue brief, we provide an overview of the economic, profitably, including policy, and technology history of shale gas development in technological innovation, the United States to ascertain what led to the shale gas government policy, private boom. For a much more detailed review, see our discussion entrepreneurship, private paper (Wang and Krupnick 2013). land and mineral rights ownership, high natural gas In the past decade, shale gas experienced an extraordinary prices in the 2000s, market boom in the United States, accounting for only 1.6 percent of structure, favorable total US natural gas production in 2000, 4.1 percent by 2005, geology, water availability, and an astonishing 23.1 percent by 2010. This remarkable and natural gas pipeline growth has spurred interest in exploring for shale gas infrastructure. resources elsewhere. A number of countries, including China, The key question for Mexico, Argentina, Poland, India, and Australia are beginning policymakers in countries to develop their own shale gas resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the 1973 Oil Crisis on the Korean Peninsula A
    OIL AS A STRATEGIC RESOURCE: IMPACT OF THE 1973 OIL CRISIS ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Asian Studies By Ruoyao Wang, B.A. Washington, D.C. Nov 15, 2019 Copyright 2019 by Ruoyao Wang All Rights Reserved ii The research and writing of this thesis is dedicated to all. Many thanks, Ruoyao Wang iii OIL AS A STRATEGIC RESOURCE: IMPACT OF THE 1973 OIL CRISIS ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA Ruoyao Wang, B.A. Thesis Advisor: Kristen Looney, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The 1973 oil crisis caused more significant economic fluctuations in the economic performance of the Republic of Korea (South Korea) compared to that of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea). Many scholars believe that it was a result of different levels of economic integration into the international trade system. South Korea developed an export-oriented economy that imported rare material and exported finished goods to the rest of the world. While North Korea’s major trading partners are the communist countries, which were far less integrated into world trade. Nevertheless, it was much more affected by the differences in physical geography and the industrial layout of these two economies in the fact that North Korea had more abundant coal reserves and hydropower potential and focused more on heavy industries. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………….…………………………………...….……...1 Literature Review…………………………….…………………………………………......2
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Terms of Trade Effects
    THE MEASUREMENT OF TERMS OF TRADE EFFECTS OECD, Paris The change in goods and services available in a national economy brought about by the shifting of external price relationships is referred to as the terms of trade effects. This paper reviews the various methods which have been devised since the war to define and quantify such effects on the Gross National Product. The statistical annex shows that, as far as OECD countries are concerned, the differences between the various measures are not significant. Whereas the effects from terms of trade represented, on auerage, less than one half of one percent of the GNP of OECD countries during the 1960's the percentage has increased substantially since 1973, due most importantly to the increase in the cil price; by 1977 (on a 1970 price basis), it had reached 5 percent of GNP in Japan and up to 6 percent in Italy. On the other hand, the extreme case of Saudi Arabia where various formulas generate effects amounting to between one half and the whole of GNP, indicates that the measurement of terms of trade effects by various methods may give different results. Since the 1973 oil crisis, economists have been increasingly concerned with the effects of the deterioration of the terms of trade on the available resources of oil importing countries. Changes in relative external prices, particularly in 1974-75 and again in 1979-80, have been sufficiently large to have important effects on these economies. Yet it is possible that in assessing the immediate post-oil crisis situation, the effect of terms of trade changes have not been sufficiently integrated into short-term economic analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Background II. Oil Products' Application for Exception
    Oil Products, Inc. Page 1 of 3 OHA Home Page Programs Regulations Cases Q & A's Info Reports Other Search OHA DECISION AND ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Application for Exception Name of Petitioner: Oil Products, Inc. Date of Filing: May 13, 1996 Case Number: VEE-0023 On May 13, 1996, Oil Products, Inc. (Oil Products) filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its application, Oil Products requests that it be relieved of the requirement to file Form EIA-782B entitled "Resellers'/Retailers' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." I. Background In response to the 1979 oil crisis, Congress enacted the Emergency Energy Conservation Act of 1979 (EECA), Pub. L. No. 96-102, 42 U.S.C. § 8501 et seq. In legislating the EECA, Congress found that "up-to-date and reliable information concerning the supply and demand of gasoline, diesel fuel, and other related data is not available to the President, the Congress, or the public." EECA § 201, 42 U.S.C. § 8501. This lack of information impeded Congress's ability to respond to the oil crisis. Congress therefore directed that the DOE establish a Middle Distillate Monitoring Program to monitor the supply and demand of middle distillates in each state at the refining, wholesale and retail levels. EECA § 242, 42 U.S.C. § 8532. The responsibility for the Middle Distillate Monitoring Program was assumed by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the DOE. Under the provisions of Section 205 of the Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]