Field & Game Australia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Deer Deer Hunting in Victoria
Victorian Hunting Guide 2012 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Quick-find reference tables 3. Licensing 4. General information 5. Compliance and enforcement 6. Use of gundogs and hounds for hunting 7. Duck 8. Deer 9. Stubble Quail 10. Introduced game birds 11. Protected wildlife 12. Pest animals 13. Australian Hunter Survey 14. Where you can hunt 15. Firearms safety 16. Contacts list 17. Sunrise and sunset times (Melbourne) during the 2012 duck season Victorian Hunting Guide: Introduction Welcome to the 2012 Victorian Hunting Guide Victoria offers game hunters world-class opportunities to hunt duck, quail and deer. The Victorian Government is committed to providing even better opportunities for Victoria’s 40,000 licensed hunters to enjoy their recreation and to promote the growth of hunting businesses in regional areas across the State. We will continue to encourage more people to interact with the natural environment and to take advantage of the outstanding opportunities for hunting, fishing and other outdoor activities that Victoria has to offer. We will work closely with the hunting community to achieve these outcomes based on the sustainable management of our game species. To support this new effort, the Victorian Government established Game Victoria as the State’s new game management authority within the Department of Primary Industries. Game Victoria will operate in a similar way to the successful management of recreational fishing in Victoria and reports to me as the responsible Minister. Game Victoria will support promotion of the game hunting sector, particularly focusing on: promoting game hunting as a popular recreational activity, important traditional pastime and generator of jobs developing improved hunting opportunities fostering the development of game-related businesses supporting and contributing to conservation and research projects delivering education and compliance programs developing strategies and policies for sustainable harvest of game species. -
A Diachronic Study of Unparliamentary Language in the New Zealand Parliament, 1890-1950
WITHDRAW AND APOLOGISE: A DIACHRONIC STUDY OF UNPARLIAMENTARY LANGUAGE IN THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT, 1890-1950 BY RUTH GRAHAM A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Linguistics Victoria University of Wellington 2016 ii “Parliament, after all, is not a Sunday school; it is a talking-shop; a place of debate”. (Barnard, 1943) iii Abstract This study presents a diachronic analysis of the language ruled to be unparliamentary in the New Zealand Parliament from 1890 to 1950. While unparliamentary language is sometimes referred to as ‘parliamentary insults’ (Ilie, 2001), this study has a wider definition: the language used in a legislative chamber is unparliamentary when it is ruled or signalled by the Speaker as out of order or likely to cause disorder. The user is required to articulate a statement of withdrawal and apology or risk further censure. The analysis uses the Communities of Practice theoretical framework, developed by Wenger (1998) and enhanced with linguistic impoliteness, as defined by Mills (2005) in order to contextualise the use of unparliamentary language within a highly regulated institutional setting. The study identifies and categorises the lexis of unparliamentary language, including a focus on examples that use New Zealand English or te reo Māori. Approximately 2600 examples of unparliamentary language, along with bibliographic, lexical, descriptive and contextual information, were entered into a custom designed relational database. The examples were categorised into three: ‘core concepts’, ‘personal reflections’ and the ‘political environment’, with a number of sub-categories. This revealed a previously unknown category of ‘situation dependent’ unparliamentary language and a creative use of ‘animal reflections’. -
Regulatory Impact Statement Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Regulatory Impact Statement
Regulatory Impact Statement Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Regulatory Impact Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared to fulfil the requirements of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994 and to facilitate public consultation on the proposed Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014. In accordance with the Victorian Guide to Regulation, the Victorian Government seeks to ensure that proposed regulations are well-targeted, effective and appropriate, and impose the lowest possible burden on Victorian businesses and the community. A prime function of the RIS process is to help members of the public comment on proposed statutory rules (regulations) before they have been finalised. Such public input can provide valuable information and different perspectives, and thus improve the overall quality of the regulations. The proposed Regulations are available to key stakeholders and any other interested parties, and feedback is now sought. Unless otherwise indicated, all submissions will be treated as public documents and will be made available to other parties upon request, or may be published. Written comments and submissions should be forwarded by 5.00pm, Tuesday 30 September 2014 to – Legislation Unit Land Management Policy Division Department of Environment and Primary Industries PO Box 500 East Melbourne VIC 8002 or email: [email protected] This Regulatory Impact Statement was prepared for the Department of Environment and Primary Industries by Regulatory Impact Solutions Pty Ltd. © The State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. -
Wetlands Australia © Commonwealth of Australia, 2017
Wetlands Australia © Commonwealth of Australia, 2017. Wetlands Australia is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/au/ This report should be attributed as ‘Wetlands Australia, Commonwealth of Australia 2017’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Energy. ii / Wetlands Australia Contents Introduction 1 Wetlands and climate change: impacts and building resilience to natural hazards. Working together for the Great Barrier Reef 2 Ridding the river of blackberries: revegetation for climate change resilience 3 Climate risk and adaptation strategies at a coastal Ramsar wetland 5 Managing coastal wetlands under climate change 7 Inland wetland rehabilitation to mitigate climate change impacts 9 Constructed wetlands for drought disaster mitigation 11 Wetland management tools: science, modelling and assessment. Our northern wetlands: science to support a sustainable future 13 Predicting the occurrence of seasonal herbaceous wetlands in south east Australia 15 Models of wetland connectivity: Supporting a landscape scale approach to wetland management 17 Lake Eyre Basin Condition Assessment 2016 19 “Where are the wetlands in NSW?” A new semi-automated method for mapping wetlands 20 Method for the long-term monitoring of wetlands in Victoria 22 Muir-Byenup Ramsar wetlands: Are they changing? 24 Looking below the surface of the Vasse Wonnerup wetlands 26 Indigenous values and connection to wetlands. -
Barmah Forest Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan
Barmah Forest Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan Department of Sustainability and Environment Parks Victoria developed this Strategic Management Plan in conjunction with the Department of Sustainability and Environment and key stakeholders, and coordinated the public comment process on the draft document. This report was prepared with financial support from the National Wetlands Program, under the Natural Heritage Trust. © The State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2003 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical or graphic) without the prior permission of the State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment. All requests and enquiries should be directed to the Copyright Officer, Library Information Services, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 5/250 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002. Disclaimers This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been made to ensure that the information in the report is accurate. The Department of Sustainability and Environment does not guarantee that the report is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence, which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. The views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Commonwealth Government of Australia, the Federal Minister for Environment and Heritage, or the Department of the Environment and Heritage. -
The Executive Officer Environment, Natural Resources and Regional Development Committee Parliament House Spring Street EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002
SUBMISSION 67 RECEIVED 01/08/2016 The Executive Officer Environment, Natural Resources and Regional Development Committee Parliament House Spring Street EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002 Submission by Robert (Bob) Gough to the Parliament of Victoria Inquiry into the control of invasive animals on Crown Land Dear Executive Officer, Please find attached my submission to the Parliament of Victoria Inquiry into the control of invasive animals on Crown land. I very much support the current regulations that permit recreational deer hunting in some of Victoria’s National Parks, and the use of volunteer hunters in well managed control programs on all crown land. The views expressed throughout this submission are my own, and do not represent any policy or standpoint other than my own. I am very willing to give evidence on any aspect of this submission at any public hearing conducted by the Inquiry. Yours Sincerely Bob Gough Submission by Robert (Bob) Gough to the Parliament of Victoria Inquiry into the control of invasive animals on Crown Land 2 “The best way to control deer is to get people to hunt more like wolves. “We should be shooting does, not bucks.” “We should have longer hunting seasons and ask hunters to shoot more than one deer.”1 Executive Summary 1. Few Australians would know that volunteer hunters from community based hunting organisations such as the ADA, SSAA and Field and Game Australia (FGA) have for many years been participating in targeted culling programs to manage overabundant and invasive native and introduced species in all Australian states except the ACT. For over 10 years across Victoria, volunteer hunters have conducted both simple and complex invasive species management on crown and private land with a range of Government and Non Government organizations and private landholders, including Parks Victoria (PV), DELWP, Trust for Nature and Landcare Victoria. -
2012 Annual Report.Pub
Field and Game Australia Annual Report 2011-12 guide to annual report This is the annual report of Field and Game Australia Inc, for the year ending June 30, 2012. The report provides information for the board, branches and stakeholders of Field and Game Australia about the organisation’s operations and performance. Field and Game Australia can not be held liable for any printing errors in this document. inside Part 1 contains an address from FGA Chairman Mr Bill Paterson and FGA contents CEO Mr Rod Drew. Part 2 gives a description of the organisation’s values, stakeholders, Chairman’s Address ...... 4 patrons, life members and management structure, as well as significant appointments and sub-committees. Part 3 details FGA’s membership statistics from this year and in CEO’s Address ...... 6 comparison to other years figures. Part 4 reports on the organisation’s achievements and performance and outlines the challenges that lay ahead. About FGA ...... 8 Part 5 recognises the achievements of various members and branches who have contributed to the overall success of the organisation. Membership ...... 11 Part 6 contains the audited financial report for the 2011-12 financial year. Part 7 reports on the game management sector, including game management, pest and vermin, and waterfowl count data. Partnerships ...... 12 Part 8 includes target participation figures and reports and results from the 2011 National Carnival. Part 9 reports on the progress of the WET Trust. Highlights ...... 13 acknowledgements FGA Awards ...... 15 Front cover image: Stockvault Contributors: Alison O’Connor, Shelley Gough, Tom Chick, Bill Paterson, Peter Rice, Noreen Sloan, Rod Drew, Rob Treble. -
Reps Front Template
The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Report of the Australian Parliamentary Delegation to China and Mongolia 7-19 April 2005 October 2005 Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 ISBN 0 642 78716 6 Contents Membership of the Delegation............................................................................................................. v Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 Aims and objectives of the Delegation ........................................................................................ 1 Overview..................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................... 3 Bilateral visit to China..................................................................................................7 China at a glance ........................................................................................................................ 7 Background................................................................................................................................. 8 The National People’s Congress and State Council.................................................................. 10 Economic overview ................................................................................................................... 12 -
Ch 1 Elect Speaker
1 Debate on the election of Speaker Background — the Clerk’s ‘uncomfortable duty’ 1.1 Current standing order 11(g) does not permit debate to take place on the election of Speaker unless there is more than one candidate. This provision was the same in the former standing orders. 1.2 The first extract below from the Hansard of 12 February 2002 gives an example of an uncontested election of Speaker proceeding in accordance with the standing orders. The mover and seconder of the motion ‘That the honourable Member for Wakefield do take the Chair of this House as Speaker’ did not speak in support of their candidate. 1.3 The second extract from the Hansard of 16 November 2004, at the start of the current Parliament, shows events not proceeding in accordance with the standing orders. The mover on this occasion spoke in support of the candidate, prompting the following intervention from the Clerk: ‘It is my uncomfortable duty to remind the House that it is strictly not in order to speak in favour of the candidates unless the election is contested.’ 1.4 This advice was promptly ignored by the seconder, who proceeded to also speak in support of the candidate, although briefly. 1 2 DEBATE ON THE ELECTION OF SPEAKER Examples from last two elections of Speaker 1.5 The following extracts from Hansard show examples of where the standing orders were and were not followed. 1) Standing orders followed — 12 February 2002 SPEAKER Election The Clerk—Honourable members, the next business is the election of a Speaker. -
National Report on the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS National Reports to be submitted to the 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Romania, June 2012 Please submit the completed National Report, in electronic (Microsoft Word) format, and preferably by e-mail, to the Ramsar Secretariat by 15 September 2011. National Reports should be sent to: Alexia Dufour, Regional Affairs Officer, Ramsar Secretariat ([email protected]) National Report Format for Ramsar COP11, page 2 Introduction & background 1. This National Report Format (NRF) has been approved by the Standing Committee in Decision SC41-24 for the Ramsar Convention’s Contracting Parties to complete as their national reporting to the 11th meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties of the Convention (Bucharest, Romania, June 2012). 2. Following Standing Committee discussions at its 40th meeting in May 2009, and its Decision SC40-29, this COP11 National Report Format closely follows that used for the COP10 National Report Format, which in turn was a significantly revised and simplified format in comparison with the National Report Formats provided to previous recent COPs. 3. In addition to thus permitting continuity of reporting and implementation progress analyses by ensuring that indicator questions are as far as possible consistent with previous NRFs (and especially the COP10 NRF), this COP11 NRF is structured in terms of the Goals and Strategies of the 2009-2015 Ramsar Strategic Plan adopted at COP10 as Resolution X.1, and the indicators -
St Mark's News
St Mark’s NEWSISSUE MARCH 2015 THE UNIVERSITIES OF ADELAIDE, PENNINGTON TERRACE NORTH ADELAIDE East Wing Opening Completing the Vision Academic and Sporting Success The College Library in the 1990s In this Issue From the Master .............................................................................................................. 3 The East Wing Project ..................................................................................................... 4 Scholarships and Academic Results ............................................................................... 6 Hawker Scholarship ......................................................................................................... 7 Cowan Grants .................................................................................................................. 7 College Club Committee ................................................................................................. 8 Students Dhow a Committment to Social Justice .......................................................... 9 About St Mark’s Sporting Success ........................................................................................................... 10 Around the College ........................................................................................................ 12 College Paralympic Hopeful Gives Back to Charity .................................................................... 14 Founded in 1925 as the first Honorary Degrees ......................................................................................................... -
Black Swamp Environmental Water Management Plan 2011
Black Swamp Environmental Water Management Plan 2011 Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority P a g e | Black Swamp Environmental Watering Plan DOCUMENT CONTROL Revision and distribution Version no. Description Issued to Issue date 1 Draft Wetland Management April 2011 Group 2 Draft DSE Scientific Panel June 2011 3 Draft DSE Sustainable Water December 2011 Environments Group 4 Final GB CMA February 2012 MANAGEMENT Prepared by Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority PO Box 1752 Shepparton Vic 3632 Telephone: (03) 5820 1100 Contact Jo Wood and Simon Casanelia Date 2011 Citation GB CMA (2011). Black Swamp Environmental Water Management Plan. Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority, Shepparton, Victoria. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you, but the Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority does not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequences which may arise from you relying on information in this publication. i | P a g e Black Swamp Environmental Watering Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This plan outlines the water regimes required to protect and enhance the water dependent environmental values of Black Swamp. This information will inform the management of the wetland and the development of seasonal watering proposal for wetlands in the Goulburn Broken Catchment for consideration by the VEWH. Black Swamp is a shallow and intermittent open water red gum swamp. It is located 2 km east of Wunghnu Township in northern Victoria. The wetland contains a significant population of the Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999) listed River swamp Wallaby-grass.