Gunbower National Park: Supply Measure Business Case

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gunbower National Park: Supply Measure Business Case 2014 1 Gunbower National Park: Supply Measure Business Case Disclaimer This business case is one of nine Victorian environmental works projects. It was developed over two years ago and submitted for assessment in early 2015 by the Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment Assessment Committee (SDLAAC) in accordance with the inter-jurisdictional governance procedures that pertain to the Murray Darling Basin Plan. This business case relies on assumptions, estimates and other variables that were considered true, accurate and the best available information at the time of development. As a result of queries raised during the SDLAAC assessment process, there have been changes to certain elements of some projects, including engineering designs, methods of water supply and future operation. These details have not been incorporated or encapsulated in this or any of the other eight business cases relevant to the Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment Mechanism within the Murray Darling Basin Plan. There has, however, been no material changes to the environmental objectives and outcomes proposed to be achieved through these projects. All nine projects will be revisited for final development once Commonwealth funding is made available. The detailed cost estimates and other commercial-in-confidence information that originally formed part of this and the other eight business cases have been deliberately omitted from this version of the document. This is in recognition that this detail is no longer relevant given the time that has passed since these business cases were originally developed, new delivery methods are applicable in some cases and to ensure that value for money is achieved when these projects are issued for tender. I Gunbower National Park: Supply Measure Business Case II Gunbower National Park: Supply Measure Business Case Acknowledgement of Country The North Central Catchment Management Authority acknowledges Aboriginal Traditional Owners within the region, their rich culture and spiritual connection to Country. We also recognise and acknowledge the contribution and interest of Aboriginal people and organisations in land and natural resource management. North Central Catchment Management Authority PO Box 18 Huntly Vic 3551 T: 03 5440 1800 F: 03 5448 7148 E: [email protected] www.nccma.vic.gov.au © North Central Catchment Management Authority, 2014 The North Central Catchment Management Authority wishes to acknowledge the Commonwealth Government for providing funding for this publication through the Victorian Department of Environment and Primary Industries. This publication may be of assistance to you, but the North Central Catchment Management Authority and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind, or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on information in this publication. III Gunbower National Park: Supply Measure Business Case Document History and Status Version Date Issued Prepared By Reviewed By Date Approved Version 1 30 November 2014 North Central CMA Emer Campbell 30 November 2014 Version 2 19 December 2014 North Central CMA Emer Campbell 19 December 2014 Distribution Version Date Quantity Issued To Version 1 30 November 2014 1 DEPI Version 2 19 December 2014 1 DEPI Document Management Printed 19 December 2014 Last saved 19 December 2014 File name SDL Business Case - Gunbower Authors North Central CMA various staff Name of organisation North Central CMA Name of document Gunbower National Park Environmental Works Project – SDL Adjustment – Phase 2 Assessment – Supply Measure Business Case Document version Version 2 Document manager NCCMA-63-40060 IV Gunbower National Park: Supply Measure Business Case Foreword Gunbower National Park covers approximately forty-six percent of the Gunbower Forest and is part of the Gunbower-Koondrook-Perricoota Forest icon site under The Living Murray Initiative. The forest, which is listed as a wetland of international importance under the Ramsar Convention, features a number of creeks, permanent and temporary wetlands, Black Box and Grey Box woodlands and River Red Gum forest. The forest is recognised as important due to the genetic and ecological diversity it sustains and its role in supporting large numbers of waterbirds during flood events. The Gunbower National Park Environmental Works Project (the Project), described in detail in this document, is a proposed supply measure designed to off-set water recovery under the Murray-Darling Basin Plan by achieving equivalent or better environmental outcomes on the ground. Current river operations have reduced the frequency of flooding from seven years in ten under natural conditions to four years in ten at present. Following extensive investigations to align ecology, hydrology and engineering, the project will fill the current hydrological gap via a package of works that will easily integrate with river and irrigation operations. The Project will deliver on ecological outcomes for the national park while generating water savings in the Murray-Darling Basin. A feasibility study into the proposed project was approved on 11 December 2013 and developed into this detailed business case over a 12-month period. The Project is now sufficiently advanced that subject to funding in the order of $12.8 million, pre-construction approvals will occur in 2015 with construction ready to commence in 2016. The upper Gunbower Forest is located in the Goulburn Murray Water-managed Torrumbarry Irrigation Area, downstream of the Torrumbarry Weir. The local community has a strong understanding of the benefits of achieving water-efficient environmental outcomes through environmental watering infrastructure. Consultation through community events and one-on-one discussions has been positive with the local community and landholders adjacent to the project area supportive of the initiative. The North Central CMA and its partners have established a strong track record in delivering environmental watering projects as demonstrated through the recent commissioning of large-scale infrastructure for watering the mid- and lower sections of Gunbower Forest, funded though The Living Murray program. This recent construction experience by the partners positions the region well to deliver on the stakeholder engagement, approvals, construction, commissioning and operation of the proposed new infrastructure. On behalf of the North Central CMA and our project partners, we commend this Business Case to you and emphasise that the region stands ready to proceed to the construction phase of the Project subject to funding. David Clark Damian Wells Chairman Chief Executive Officer V Gunbower National Park: Supply Measure Business Case Executive Summary The Gunbower National Park Environmental Works Project (the Project) is an environmental water infrastructure proposal that will contribute to achieving the ‘Sustainable Diversion Limit (SDL) Off-set’ element of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan (Basin Plan). The Project is a ‘supply measure’, designed to off-set the Basin Plan’s water recovery target of 2,750 gigalitres (GL) by achieving equivalent or better environmental outcomes on the ground. The Project is one of nine proposed infrastructure based supply measures being investigated within Victoria, and one of two within the North Central CMA region. The Gunbower National Park business base (the Business Case) sets out the ecological objectives, proposed infrastructure package, operating strategies, ecological risks and benefits and the costs associated with progressing the Project, from construction through to operation. It has been developed in partnership with the Department of Environment and Primary Industries (DEPI), Parks Victoria and Goulburn Murray Water (GMW). The following provides an overview of the business case and main conclusions. Significance of the site Gunbower National Park (8,892 hectares) is located within the broader Gunbower Forest, on the mid-Murray floodplain of northern Victoria. It is recognised as internationally significant under the Ramsar Convention and as an ‘Icon Site’ under The Living Murray (TLM) Initiative; one of six environmental assets of the River Murray that have the highest priority for rehabilitation through water management. In 2010 the Victorian Government created the Gunbower National Park in recognition of the importance of the upper part of Gunbower Forest and its need for greater protection. This part of the forest features permanent wetlands, temporary wetlands, River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) forest and Black Box (E. largiflorens) and Grey Box (E. microcarpa) woodlands. The area also supports a range of communities and species - many of which are listed as rare or threatened under state and national legislation (e.g. Australasian Bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus)). For its traditional owners, the Yorta Yorta people, Gunbower Forest is a significant cultural landscape. Scarred trees, earthen mounds, artefact scatters, shell middens and burial sites are present. In addition, the local community highly value the forest for the social and recreational values it supports. Vision and objectives The overall vision for Gunbower Forest is to: Maintain and improve Gunbower Island by enabling native plants and animals to flourish, restoring the floodplain’s health for future generations. The goal for water management in the Gunbower National Park is to: To reinstate a more
Recommended publications
  • Northern Region
    Section 5 Northern Region 109 5.1 Northern Region overview ............................................................................................... 111 5.2 Victorian Murray system .................................................................................................. 114 5.2.1 Barmah Forest ...................................................................................................... 116 5.2.2 Gunbower Creek and Forest ................................................................................ 119 5.2.3 Central Murray wetlands ...................................................................................... 124 5.2.4 Hattah Lakes ........................................................................................................ 129 5.2.5 Lower Murray wetlands ........................................................................................ 132 5.2.6 Lindsay, Mulcra and Wallpolla islands .................................................................. 137 5.3 Ovens system ................................................................................................................... 141 5.4 Goulburn system .............................................................................................................. 145 5.4.1 Goulburn River ..................................................................................................... 147 5.4.2 Goulburn wetlands ............................................................................................... 152 5.5 Broken system .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Deer Deer Hunting in Victoria
    Victorian Hunting Guide 2012 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Quick-find reference tables 3. Licensing 4. General information 5. Compliance and enforcement 6. Use of gundogs and hounds for hunting 7. Duck 8. Deer 9. Stubble Quail 10. Introduced game birds 11. Protected wildlife 12. Pest animals 13. Australian Hunter Survey 14. Where you can hunt 15. Firearms safety 16. Contacts list 17. Sunrise and sunset times (Melbourne) during the 2012 duck season Victorian Hunting Guide: Introduction Welcome to the 2012 Victorian Hunting Guide Victoria offers game hunters world-class opportunities to hunt duck, quail and deer. The Victorian Government is committed to providing even better opportunities for Victoria’s 40,000 licensed hunters to enjoy their recreation and to promote the growth of hunting businesses in regional areas across the State. We will continue to encourage more people to interact with the natural environment and to take advantage of the outstanding opportunities for hunting, fishing and other outdoor activities that Victoria has to offer. We will work closely with the hunting community to achieve these outcomes based on the sustainable management of our game species. To support this new effort, the Victorian Government established Game Victoria as the State’s new game management authority within the Department of Primary Industries. Game Victoria will operate in a similar way to the successful management of recreational fishing in Victoria and reports to me as the responsible Minister. Game Victoria will support promotion of the game hunting sector, particularly focusing on: promoting game hunting as a popular recreational activity, important traditional pastime and generator of jobs developing improved hunting opportunities fostering the development of game-related businesses supporting and contributing to conservation and research projects delivering education and compliance programs developing strategies and policies for sustainable harvest of game species.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks Act Annual Report 2014 © the State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2014
    National Parks Act Annual Report 2014 © The State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment and Primary Industries logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Printed by Impact Digital – Brunswick ISSN 1839-437X ISSN 1839-4388 (online) Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DEPI Customer Service Centre on 136186, email customer. [email protected] or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.depi.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Further information For further information, please contact the DEPI Customer Service Centre on 136 186 or the Parks Victoria Information Centre on 131 963. Notes • The Minister responsible for administering the National Parks Act 1975 during the year was the Hon Ryan Smith MP, Minister for Environment and Climate Change.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Impact Statement Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Regulatory Impact Statement
    Regulatory Impact Statement Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Regulatory Impact Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared to fulfil the requirements of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994 and to facilitate public consultation on the proposed Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014. In accordance with the Victorian Guide to Regulation, the Victorian Government seeks to ensure that proposed regulations are well-targeted, effective and appropriate, and impose the lowest possible burden on Victorian businesses and the community. A prime function of the RIS process is to help members of the public comment on proposed statutory rules (regulations) before they have been finalised. Such public input can provide valuable information and different perspectives, and thus improve the overall quality of the regulations. The proposed Regulations are available to key stakeholders and any other interested parties, and feedback is now sought. Unless otherwise indicated, all submissions will be treated as public documents and will be made available to other parties upon request, or may be published. Written comments and submissions should be forwarded by 5.00pm, Tuesday 30 September 2014 to – Legislation Unit Land Management Policy Division Department of Environment and Primary Industries PO Box 500 East Melbourne VIC 8002 or email: [email protected] This Regulatory Impact Statement was prepared for the Department of Environment and Primary Industries by Regulatory Impact Solutions Pty Ltd. © The State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallpolla Island Floodplain Restoration Project
    EPBC Act referral Note: PDF may contain fields not relevant to your application. These fields will appear blank or unticked. Please disregard these fields. Title of proposal 2020/8750 - Wallpolla Island Floodplain Restoration Project Section 1 Summary of your proposed action 1.1 Project industry type Water Management and Use 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities The Wallpolla Island Floodplain Restoration Project aims to restore a more natural inundation regime across approximately 2,672 hectares (ha) of high-ecological-value Murray River floodplain within the broader Murray-Sunset National Park (refer Attachment 1a, 1b and 1c). Wallpolla Island is located downstream of the junction of the Murray and Darling rivers and within the lower Murray River floodplain. The Wallpolla Island floodplain has an area of approximately 9,000 ha and extends 29 kilometres (km) from east to west and is approximately seven km in width. Wallpolla Island is an environmentally significant area that is critically important to the biodiversity of the entire Lower Murray region and is listed in the Directory of Important Wetlands in Australia (Environment, Australia 2001). The Murray River flow at Wallpolla Island has been significantly altered by storages, regulation and diversion upstream on both the upper Murray and Darling Rivers. This has caused a reduction in large winter and spring flow peaks and an increase of low summer flows on the floodplain. Locks and weirs have further altered the hydrology of the local floodplain by removing fluctuations in river levels. Using water from both natural flood events and pumping from the Murray River, the project aims to more closely align the frequency, duration and timing of future flood events, with the natural (pre-regulation) frequency, duration and timing of flood events experienced by targeted water regime classes within the managed inundation area.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunbower Forest Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description
    Gunbower Forest Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description June 2011 Citation: Hale, J. and Butcher, R., 2011, Ecological Character Description for the Gunbower Forest Ramsar Site. Report to the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPaC), Canberra. Acknowledgements: Peter Cottingham, Peter Cottingham and Associates (workshop facilitation). Halina Kobryn, Murdoch University (mapping and GIS). Jane Roberts (expert knowledge floodplain vegetation). DSE (2010) formed the basis of many sections of this updated Ecological Character Description. DSE (2010) was prepared for the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) by Ecological Associates Pty Ltd, Malvern South Australia with the assistance of a project steering committee, which included representatives from DSE (Victorian Government), DSEWPaC (Australian Government), the Mallee Catchment Management Authority and Parks Victoria. The steering committee was comprised of the following: • Leah Beesley, DSE • Tamara Boyd, Parks Victoria • Lyndell Davis, DSEWPaC • John Foster, DSEWPaC • Janet Holmes, DSE • Richard Loyn, DSE • Shar Ramamurthy, DSE • Melanie Tranter, North Central Catchment Management Authority • Keith Ward, Goulburn-Broken Catchment Management Authority • Kane Weeks, Parks Victoria Introductory Notes: This Ecological Character Description (ECD Publication) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar Wetlands (DEWHA 2008). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks Act Annual Report 2019–20 1 Contents
    NATIONAL PARKS ACT ANNUAL REPORT 2019–2020 Traditional Owner Acknowledgement Victoria’s network of parks and reserves form the core of Aboriginal cultural landscapes, which have been modified over many thousands of years of occupation. They are reflections of how Aboriginal people engaged with their world and experienced their surroundings and are the product of thousands of generations of economic activity, material culture and settlement patterns. The landscapes we see today are influenced by the skills, knowledge and activities of Aboriginal land managers. Parks Victoria acknowledges the Traditional Owners of these cultural landscapes, recognising their continuing connection to Victoria’s parks and reserves and their ongoing role in caring for Country. Copyright © State of Victoria, Parks Victoria 2020 Level 10, 535 Bourke Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 ISSN 2652-3183 (print) ISSN 2652-3191 (online) Published on www.parks.vic.gov.au This report was printed on 100% recycled paper. This publication may be of assistance to you but Parks Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication Notes • During the year the responsible Minister for the Act was the Hon Lily D’Ambrosio MP, Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change. • In this report: – the Act means the National Parks Act 1975 – DELWP means the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning – the Minister means the Minister responsible for administering the Act – the Regulations means the National Parks Regulations 2013 – the Secretary means the Secretary to the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands Australia © Commonwealth of Australia, 2017
    Wetlands Australia © Commonwealth of Australia, 2017. Wetlands Australia is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/au/ This report should be attributed as ‘Wetlands Australia, Commonwealth of Australia 2017’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Energy. ii / Wetlands Australia Contents Introduction 1 Wetlands and climate change: impacts and building resilience to natural hazards. Working together for the Great Barrier Reef 2 Ridding the river of blackberries: revegetation for climate change resilience 3 Climate risk and adaptation strategies at a coastal Ramsar wetland 5 Managing coastal wetlands under climate change 7 Inland wetland rehabilitation to mitigate climate change impacts 9 Constructed wetlands for drought disaster mitigation 11 Wetland management tools: science, modelling and assessment. Our northern wetlands: science to support a sustainable future 13 Predicting the occurrence of seasonal herbaceous wetlands in south east Australia 15 Models of wetland connectivity: Supporting a landscape scale approach to wetland management 17 Lake Eyre Basin Condition Assessment 2016 19 “Where are the wetlands in NSW?” A new semi-automated method for mapping wetlands 20 Method for the long-term monitoring of wetlands in Victoria 22 Muir-Byenup Ramsar wetlands: Are they changing? 24 Looking below the surface of the Vasse Wonnerup wetlands 26 Indigenous values and connection to wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Barmah Forest Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan
    Barmah Forest Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan Department of Sustainability and Environment Parks Victoria developed this Strategic Management Plan in conjunction with the Department of Sustainability and Environment and key stakeholders, and coordinated the public comment process on the draft document. This report was prepared with financial support from the National Wetlands Program, under the Natural Heritage Trust. © The State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2003 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical or graphic) without the prior permission of the State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment. All requests and enquiries should be directed to the Copyright Officer, Library Information Services, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 5/250 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002. Disclaimers This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been made to ensure that the information in the report is accurate. The Department of Sustainability and Environment does not guarantee that the report is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence, which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. The views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Commonwealth Government of Australia, the Federal Minister for Environment and Heritage, or the Department of the Environment and Heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Executive Officer Environment, Natural Resources and Regional Development Committee Parliament House Spring Street EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002
    SUBMISSION 67 RECEIVED 01/08/2016 The Executive Officer Environment, Natural Resources and Regional Development Committee Parliament House Spring Street EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002 Submission by Robert (Bob) Gough to the Parliament of Victoria Inquiry into the control of invasive animals on Crown Land Dear Executive Officer, Please find attached my submission to the Parliament of Victoria Inquiry into the control of invasive animals on Crown land. I very much support the current regulations that permit recreational deer hunting in some of Victoria’s National Parks, and the use of volunteer hunters in well managed control programs on all crown land. The views expressed throughout this submission are my own, and do not represent any policy or standpoint other than my own. I am very willing to give evidence on any aspect of this submission at any public hearing conducted by the Inquiry. Yours Sincerely Bob Gough Submission by Robert (Bob) Gough to the Parliament of Victoria Inquiry into the control of invasive animals on Crown Land 2 “The best way to control deer is to get people to hunt more like wolves. “We should be shooting does, not bucks.” “We should have longer hunting seasons and ask hunters to shoot more than one deer.”1 Executive Summary 1. Few Australians would know that volunteer hunters from community based hunting organisations such as the ADA, SSAA and Field and Game Australia (FGA) have for many years been participating in targeted culling programs to manage overabundant and invasive native and introduced species in all Australian states except the ACT. For over 10 years across Victoria, volunteer hunters have conducted both simple and complex invasive species management on crown and private land with a range of Government and Non Government organizations and private landholders, including Parks Victoria (PV), DELWP, Trust for Nature and Landcare Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTHY, WORKING MURRAY–DARLING BASIN Basin Plan Annual Report 2015–16
    TOWARDS A HEALTHY, WORKING MURRAY–DARLING BASIN Basin Plan annual report 2015–16 i Basin Plan annual report 2015–16 Acknowledgement of the Traditional Owners In the spirit of respecting and strengthening partnerships with Australia’s First Peoples, the Murray–Darling Basin Authority would like to acknowledge all Traditional Owners of this land. The MDBA pays its respects to the Nations and their Elders past and present who hold the authority, memories, knowledge and traditions of a living Aboriginal culture. The MDBA offers its deepest appreciation and respect for the First Peoples continued connection and responsibility to the land and waters of the Murray– Darling Basin, including their unique role in the life of the Basin. The past year has provided many opportunities to work with the First Peoples of the Basin to make sure Aboriginal scientific and cultural knowledge is included in water management. The MDBA thanks the Murray Lower Darling Rivers Indigenous Nations (MLDRIN), the Northern Basin Aboriginal Nations (NBAN) and all the Basin Nations for their willingness to be involved in the implementation of the Basin Plan. ii BasinMLDRIN Plan and annual NBAN report delegates 2015–16 with friends in Canberra, August 2016 Contents 02 About this report 37 A healthy Basin environment 07 The year in review 38 Basin-wide environmental watering 10 Working together 40 Delivering water to priorities 11 Implementing the Basin Plan 47 Looking ahead 13 Recovering water 48 Towards 2026 14 Adapting the sustainable diversion limits 18 Water resource planning 22 Maintaining water quality 25 Basin communities and industries 26 Water recovery and communities 26 Water recovery and infrastructure 32 Water markets Socio-economic benefits of 36 environmental watering Basin Plan annual report 2015–16 1 About this report This is the third annual report on how implementation The report draws from information provided by Basin of the Basin Plan and associated reforms are tracking state governments, the Commonwealth Environmental against social, economic and environmental outcomes.
    [Show full text]