HEALTHY, WORKING MURRAY–DARLING BASIN Basin Plan Annual Report 2015–16

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HEALTHY, WORKING MURRAY–DARLING BASIN Basin Plan Annual Report 2015–16 TOWARDS A HEALTHY, WORKING MURRAY–DARLING BASIN Basin Plan annual report 2015–16 i Basin Plan annual report 2015–16 Acknowledgement of the Traditional Owners In the spirit of respecting and strengthening partnerships with Australia’s First Peoples, the Murray–Darling Basin Authority would like to acknowledge all Traditional Owners of this land. The MDBA pays its respects to the Nations and their Elders past and present who hold the authority, memories, knowledge and traditions of a living Aboriginal culture. The MDBA offers its deepest appreciation and respect for the First Peoples continued connection and responsibility to the land and waters of the Murray– Darling Basin, including their unique role in the life of the Basin. The past year has provided many opportunities to work with the First Peoples of the Basin to make sure Aboriginal scientific and cultural knowledge is included in water management. The MDBA thanks the Murray Lower Darling Rivers Indigenous Nations (MLDRIN), the Northern Basin Aboriginal Nations (NBAN) and all the Basin Nations for their willingness to be involved in the implementation of the Basin Plan. ii BasinMLDRIN Plan and annual NBAN report delegates 2015–16 with friends in Canberra, August 2016 Contents 02 About this report 37 A healthy Basin environment 07 The year in review 38 Basin-wide environmental watering 10 Working together 40 Delivering water to priorities 11 Implementing the Basin Plan 47 Looking ahead 13 Recovering water 48 Towards 2026 14 Adapting the sustainable diversion limits 18 Water resource planning 22 Maintaining water quality 25 Basin communities and industries 26 Water recovery and communities 26 Water recovery and infrastructure 32 Water markets Socio-economic benefits of 36 environmental watering Basin Plan annual report 2015–16 1 About this report This is the third annual report on how implementation The report draws from information provided by Basin of the Basin Plan and associated reforms are tracking state governments, the Commonwealth Environmental against social, economic and environmental outcomes. Water Office, the Department of Agriculture and The report provides an update on how governments, Water Resources, the MDBA and other Australian industry and communities have been working Government agencies. together to implement the Basin Plan. A more detailed five-year evaluation of the Basin The report focuses on progress made during 2015–16 Plan will occur in 2017. The evaluation will look at as well as providing some information on emerging whether implementation is on track, report on the trends. The report also covers some important outcomes and impacts so far, and where appropriate activities that occurred in the second half of 2016 — identify if there are any areas or ways that future to provide a more complete picture of recent progress implementation could be improved. with implementation. The report uses three themes to describe progress: Working Basin communities A healthy Basin together and industries environment Looking west over the River Murray above Albury 2 Basin Plan annual report 2015–16 The Murray–Darling Basin The Murray–Darling Basin is one of Australia’s most The climate of the Murray–Darling Basin is highly productive agricultural regions, producing more than variable, and run-off into its rivers is very low one-third of the nation’s food. The Basin spans five compared with other major river systems around jurisdictions and extends over one million square the world. The importance of water for sustaining kilometres of south-eastern Australia, see Figure 1. communities, industries and the environment, along The Basin provides water for over three million with a variable climate and low in-flows makes water people, is culturally management in the Basin challenging and important. significant to Aboriginal people, and supports a diverse range of ecosystems, plants Charleville and animals. Roma BRISBANE Toowoomba Cunnamulla St George Currawinya Lakes NORTHERN Goondiwindi BASIN Dirranbandi Narran Lake Moree Bourke Gwydir Wetlands Paroo River Narrabri Wetlands Tamworth Macquarie Marshes Broken Hill Dubbo Ivanhoe Banrock Station Forbes Orange Wetland Complex Riverland SOUTHERN Cowra SYDNEY Renmark Wentworth BASIN Griffith Fivebough-Tuckerbil Mildura Hattah-Kulkyne NSW Central ADELAIDE Murray Lakes Murray State Forests Wagga Bridge Leeton Wagga Pinnaroo Swan Hill CANBERRA Ginini Flats Lake Albacutya Deniliquin wetland Barmah Forest Coorong and Lakes complex Alexandrina and Albert Echuca Albury Horsham Bendigo Shepparton Irrigation area (indicative) Seymour Ramsar site Gunbower Forest MELBOURNE Figure 1: Murray–Darling Basin Kerang Wetlands Basin Plan annual report 2015–16 3 The history of Basin Snapshot water reform Murray–Darling Basin Basin governments have long grappled with the The Murray–Darling Basin is home to more complex issue of sharing the water of the Basin. than two million people, including more than As communities and agriculture have developed, 46 Aboriginal Nations. there have been many agreements and plans for Outside the Basin, a further 1.3 million people extracting and sharing water from the River Murray depend on its water resources. and the Basin as a whole. In 2014–15*, the gross value of agricultural Leading up to the new millennium, there was production was $20.6 billion significant progress in the reform of water (of this $7 billion was from irrigation). sharing and water management, however the fundamental issue of over-extraction remained. In 2014–15*, 46% of the gross value of The millennium drought — a significant drought Australia’s irrigated production came from the across much of the Basin, from the late 1990s Basin — from an area of 1.4 million hectares. to 2010 — exposed the limits and weaknesses of Irrigated production in the Basin accounts for: existing water management and highlighted the need for further reform to ensure ongoing river nearly 100% of Australia’s rice health and sustainability. 93% of Australia’s cotton The drought led to the Australian Government passing the Water Act 2007 with bipartisan 76% of Australia’s grapes support. The Water Act required the Murray–Darling Basin Authority to prepare a Basin Plan to manage 29% of Australia’s dairy the Basin water resources in the national interest, and in a way that optimises economic, social and nearly 100% of Australia’s oranges. environmental outcomes. There are over 30,000 wetlands of which In 2008, the governments of South Australia, 16 are listed as internationally significant Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland and (Ramsar sites). the Australian Capital Territory committed to implementing the Basin Plan through an The Basin is home to a diverse range of intergovernmental agreement, and referred relevant ecosystems, plants and animals, including powers to the Australian Government to do so. threatened species such as silver perch and The Basin Plan was then passed by parliament in the Murray hardyhead, waterbirds and the 2012, again with bipartisan support. The Australian iconic river red gum. Government is investing $13 billion dollars in the * Most recent data available. Murray Darling Basin to facilitate the transition to the new water sharing arrangements. 4 Basin Plan annual report 2015–16 About 45,000 BP (Before Present) Archaeological evidence of the First Nations Peoples of Australia in the Basin. First Nations connection to ancestral lands continues today and is conveyed through stories, totems and law 1870 Highest recorded flood in 1880 Severe drought through 2003 Governments agree to recover the Murray system southern and eastern states, 500 GL of water for the environment lasting six years under the Living Murray initiative 1917 The River 1914 First River Murray Murray Commission Agreement signed is established 1956 Highest Basin 1997 Governments inflows in recent implement a cap on the 2004 National Water history cause volume of water use, and the Initiative signed by all widespread flooding longest drought in Australia’s Australian governments recorded history begins and aims to improve the 1981 Murray Mouth (1997–2010) way Australia protects, closes for the first time manages, plans for, in recorded history prices and trades water 1992 Murray–Darling Basin Commission replaces the River Murray Commission 2006 Lowest Basin water inflows on 2008 Murray– record (9,300 GL) Darling Basin Authority takes over Early 2007 The Australian the functions of 2016 Government announces a the Murray–Daring Findings of $10 billion plan to make Basin Commission the Northern Drought water use more sustainable Basin Review Flood released 2012 The Basin Plan becomes 2010 Late 2007 The Water Act law, providing for the first time a Figure 2: The 2007 sets out water reforms, history of Basin coordinated sustainable approach to including requirements for water reform water use across the Basin states the Basin Plan The Basin Plan The purpose of the Basin Plan is to ensure that water appropriate monitoring and evaluation is shared between all uses, including environmental improvements in water quality and cultural uses, in a sustainable way. The goal is to ensure that the Basin’s rivers can continue to support The Basin Plan is adaptive and can be refined and communities and industries in the long term as they updated with the knowledge gained from reviews adapt to changes, including a changing climate. The and evaluations. The Basin Plan is also being Basin Plan is the result of several years of research, implemented gradually over a long period
Recommended publications
  • Northern Region
    Section 5 Northern Region 109 5.1 Northern Region overview ............................................................................................... 111 5.2 Victorian Murray system .................................................................................................. 114 5.2.1 Barmah Forest ...................................................................................................... 116 5.2.2 Gunbower Creek and Forest ................................................................................ 119 5.2.3 Central Murray wetlands ...................................................................................... 124 5.2.4 Hattah Lakes ........................................................................................................ 129 5.2.5 Lower Murray wetlands ........................................................................................ 132 5.2.6 Lindsay, Mulcra and Wallpolla islands .................................................................. 137 5.3 Ovens system ................................................................................................................... 141 5.4 Goulburn system .............................................................................................................. 145 5.4.1 Goulburn River ..................................................................................................... 147 5.4.2 Goulburn wetlands ............................................................................................... 152 5.5 Broken system .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission Report
    Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission Report 29 January 2019 Commissioner Bret Walker SC 29 January 2019 His Excellency the Honourable Hieu Van Le AC Governor of South Australia Government House GPO Box 2373 ADELAIDE SA 5001 Your Excellency In accordance with the letters patent issued to me on 23 January 2018, I enclose my report. I note that I have been able to take account of materials available as at 11 January 2019. Yours sincerely Bret Walker Commissioner Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission Report Bret Walker SC Commissioner 29 January 2019 © Government of South Australia ISBN 978-0-6484670-1-4 (paperback) 978-0-6484670-2-1 (online resource) Creative Commons Licence With the exception of the South Australian Coat of Arms, any logos and any images, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. Suggested attribution: South Australia, Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission, Report (2019). Contents Acknowledgments 1 Terms of Reference 5 Overview 9 Responses to Terms of Reference, Key Findings & Recommendations 45 1. History 77 2. Constitutional Basis of the Water Act 99 3. ESLT Interpretation 127 4. Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan 163 5. ESLT Process 185 6. Climate Change 241 7. The SDL Adjustment Mechanism 285 8. Constraints 347 9. Efficiency Measures & the 450 GL 381 10. Northern Basin Review 427 11. Aboriginal Engagement 465 12. Water Resource Plans 509 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Impacts of Drought
    Social Impacts of Drought A report to NSW Agriculture Margaret Alston Jenny Kent Centre for Rural Social Research Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga Copyright 2004 Published February 2004 for the Centre for Rural Social Research Charles Sturt University Locked Bag 678 Wagga Wagga NSW 2678 AUSTRALIA phone: 02 6933 2778 fax: 02 6933 2293 email: [email protected] By Margaret Alston and Jenny Kent Coordinated by Kate Roberts Cover design by Tony O’Neill Printed by Active Print National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-publication data Alson, Margaret. Social impacts of drought : a report to NSW Agriculture. ISBN 1 86467 149 1. 1. Droughts - New South Wales. 2. Droughts - Australia. 3. Rural population - New South Wales. 4. Drought relief - New South Wales. I. Kent, Jenny, 1953- . II. Charles Sturt University. Centre for Rural Social Research. III. Title. 363.3492909944 Contents Page Acknowledgements x Terms of Reference xi Executive Summary xii 1. Background 1 1.1 Economic Impacts 1 1.2 Social Impacts 3 1.3 Definitions 4 1.4 Structure of the Report 6 2. Drought 7 2.1 What Is It? 7 2.2 Commonwealth Government Policy on Drought 7 2.3 Drought Declared Areas of Australia 11 2.4 Drought Declared Areas of New South Wales 12 3. Exceptional Circumstances 15 3.1 EC Declaration 17 3.2 Assistance Following an EC Declaration 18 3.3 Interim Assistance in prima facie Areas 19 3.4 Small Business Interest Rate Relief Program 20 4. Services and Programs for Drought Affected Families, Communities and Businesses 21 i 4.1 Commonwealth Assistance Measures 21 4.2 NSW Provisions 21 5.
    [Show full text]
  • SURVEY of VEGETATION and HABITAT in KEY RIPARIAN ZONES of TRIBUTARIES of the MURRUMBIDGEE RIVER in the ACT: Naas, Gudgenby, Paddys, Cotter and Molonglo Rivers
    SURVEY OF VEGETATION AND HABITAT IN KEY RIPARIAN ZONES OF TRIBUTARIES OF THE MURRUMBIDGEE RIVER IN THE ACT: Naas, Gudgenby, Paddys, Cotter and Molonglo Rivers Lesley Peden, Stephen Skinner, Luke Johnston, Kevin Frawley, Felicity Grant and Lisa Evans Technical Report 23 November 2011 Conservation Planning and Research | Policy Division | Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate TECHNICAL REPORT 23 Survey of Vegetation and Habitat in Key Riparian Zones of Tributaries of the Murrumbidgee River in the ACT: Naas, Gudgenby, Paddys, Cotter and Molonglo Rivers Lesley Peden, Stephen Skinner, Luke Johnston, Kevin Frawley, Felicity Grant and Lisa Evans Conservation, Planning and Research Policy Division Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate GPO Box 158, CANBERRA ACT 2601 i Front cover: The Murrumbidgee River and environs near Tharwa Sandwash recreation area, Tharwa, ACT. Photographs: Luke Johnston, Lesley Peden and Mark Jekabsons. ISBN: 978‐0‐9806848‐7‐2 © Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate, Canberra, 2011 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to appropriate referencing of the source. This document should be cited as: Peden, L., Skinner, S., Johnston, L., Frawley, K., Grant, F., and Evans, L. 2011. Survey of Vegetation and Habitat in Key Riparian Zones in Tributaries of the Murrumbidgee River in the ACT: Cotter, Molonglo, Gudgenby, Naas and Paddys Rivers. Technical Report 23. Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate, Canberra. Published by Conservation Planning and Research, Policy Division, Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate. http://www.environment.act.gov.au | Telephone: Canberra Connect 132 281 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks Act Annual Report 2014 © the State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2014
    National Parks Act Annual Report 2014 © The State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment and Primary Industries logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Printed by Impact Digital – Brunswick ISSN 1839-437X ISSN 1839-4388 (online) Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DEPI Customer Service Centre on 136186, email customer. [email protected] or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.depi.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Further information For further information, please contact the DEPI Customer Service Centre on 136 186 or the Parks Victoria Information Centre on 131 963. Notes • The Minister responsible for administering the National Parks Act 1975 during the year was the Hon Ryan Smith MP, Minister for Environment and Climate Change.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW of the ACT WATER RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES 2013 November 2017 Final Report to Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate
    REVIEW OF THE ACT WATER RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES 2013 November 2017 Final Report to Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate. APPLIEDECOLOGY.EDU.AU ACT ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES: REVIEW Prepared for: Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government Produced by: Institute for Applied Ecology appliedecology.edu.au University of Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: (02) 6201 2795 Facsimile: (02) 6201 5651 Authors: Dr. Adrian Dusting, Mr. Ben Broadhurst, Dr. Sue Nichols, Dr. Fiona Dyer This report should be cited as: Dusting,A., Broadhurst, B., Nichols, S. and Dyer, F. (2017) Review of the ACT Water Resources Environmental Flow Guidelines 2013. Final report to EPSDD, ACT Government. Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra. Inquiries regarding this document should be addressed to: Dr. Fiona Dyer Institute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Canberra 2601 Telephone: (02) 6201 2452 Facsimile: (02) 6201 5651 Email: [email protected] Document history and status Version Date Issued Reviewed by Approved by Revision Type Draft 07/08/2017 IAE EFG review Adrian Dusting Internal team Final 11/08/2017 Adrian Dusting Fiona Dyer Internal Final - revised 15/11/2017 ACT Gov. steering Adrian Dusting External committee, EFTAG, MDBA Front cover photo: Cotter River at Top Flats. Photo by Fiona Dyer APPLIEDECOLOGY.EDU.AU ii ACT ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES: REVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................... vii Background and
    [Show full text]
  • Wallpolla Island Floodplain Restoration Project
    EPBC Act referral Note: PDF may contain fields not relevant to your application. These fields will appear blank or unticked. Please disregard these fields. Title of proposal 2020/8750 - Wallpolla Island Floodplain Restoration Project Section 1 Summary of your proposed action 1.1 Project industry type Water Management and Use 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities The Wallpolla Island Floodplain Restoration Project aims to restore a more natural inundation regime across approximately 2,672 hectares (ha) of high-ecological-value Murray River floodplain within the broader Murray-Sunset National Park (refer Attachment 1a, 1b and 1c). Wallpolla Island is located downstream of the junction of the Murray and Darling rivers and within the lower Murray River floodplain. The Wallpolla Island floodplain has an area of approximately 9,000 ha and extends 29 kilometres (km) from east to west and is approximately seven km in width. Wallpolla Island is an environmentally significant area that is critically important to the biodiversity of the entire Lower Murray region and is listed in the Directory of Important Wetlands in Australia (Environment, Australia 2001). The Murray River flow at Wallpolla Island has been significantly altered by storages, regulation and diversion upstream on both the upper Murray and Darling Rivers. This has caused a reduction in large winter and spring flow peaks and an increase of low summer flows on the floodplain. Locks and weirs have further altered the hydrology of the local floodplain by removing fluctuations in river levels. Using water from both natural flood events and pumping from the Murray River, the project aims to more closely align the frequency, duration and timing of future flood events, with the natural (pre-regulation) frequency, duration and timing of flood events experienced by targeted water regime classes within the managed inundation area.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunbower Forest Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description
    Gunbower Forest Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description June 2011 Citation: Hale, J. and Butcher, R., 2011, Ecological Character Description for the Gunbower Forest Ramsar Site. Report to the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPaC), Canberra. Acknowledgements: Peter Cottingham, Peter Cottingham and Associates (workshop facilitation). Halina Kobryn, Murdoch University (mapping and GIS). Jane Roberts (expert knowledge floodplain vegetation). DSE (2010) formed the basis of many sections of this updated Ecological Character Description. DSE (2010) was prepared for the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) by Ecological Associates Pty Ltd, Malvern South Australia with the assistance of a project steering committee, which included representatives from DSE (Victorian Government), DSEWPaC (Australian Government), the Mallee Catchment Management Authority and Parks Victoria. The steering committee was comprised of the following: • Leah Beesley, DSE • Tamara Boyd, Parks Victoria • Lyndell Davis, DSEWPaC • John Foster, DSEWPaC • Janet Holmes, DSE • Richard Loyn, DSE • Shar Ramamurthy, DSE • Melanie Tranter, North Central Catchment Management Authority • Keith Ward, Goulburn-Broken Catchment Management Authority • Kane Weeks, Parks Victoria Introductory Notes: This Ecological Character Description (ECD Publication) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar Wetlands (DEWHA 2008). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing and Sharing the Risks of Drought in Australia
    Managing and Sharing the Risks of Drought in Australia By Greg Hertzler The University of Western Australia Ross Kingwell Department of Agriculture & Food, Western Australia and The University of Western Australia Jason Crean The University of Sydney and Chris Carter Department of Agriculture & Food, Western Australia and The University of Western Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Invited paper presented to the 26th Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, “Contributions of Agricultural Economics to Critical Policy Issues,” Gold Coast, Queensland Australia, 12-18 August, 2006. Risks of Drought in Australia Introduction Australia is a large, dry and often hot continent. Australian farmers and agribusiness managers must be very adaptable to survive. Climate researchers are steadily improving the skill of their forecasts. Agricultural researchers are improving our knowledge of how systems respond to climate change and drought. Economists continue to improve our understanding of decisions under risk, including weather and climate risks. In this paper we review the nature and extent of climate change and risks for Australia. Then we review the research and practice in adapting farm businesses. Sharing of financial risks is fairly easy, but sharing of climate risks is very difficult. We review the lessons of the past and the possibilities for the future. We believe that researchers, farmers and agribusiness must all work together to manage climate change and risks in the future. Communicating about such complex issues among diverse groups of people is not easy. Finally we propose a framework, based upon real options, for thinking about an d solving problems in adapting to climate change and sharing of climate risks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Citizens' Inquiry Into the Health of the Barka/Darling River And
    Australian Peoples’ Tribunal for Community and Nature’s Rights 2019 Citizens’ Inquiry into the Health of the Barka/Darling River and Menindee Lakes REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 30 SEPTEMBER 2020 Michelle Maloney, Gill Boehringer, Gwynn MacCarrick, Manav Satija, Mary Graham and Ross Williams Australian Peoples’ Tribunal for Community and Nature’s Rights an initiative of the Australian Earth Laws Alliance Michelle Maloney • Gill Boehringer Gwynn MacCarrick • Manav Satija Report Editor Michelle Maloney Mary Graham • Ross Williams Layout, Cover Design and uncredited photos: James K. Lee Cover image: Wilcannia Bridge over the Barka / Darling River. 24 March 2019. 2019 Citizens’ Inquiry © 2020 Australian Peoples’ Tribunal for Community and Nature’s Rights (APT) into the Health of the Barka / Darling River All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act 1968 (for example, a fair dealing for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review), no part of this report may be reproduced, and Menindee Lakes stored in a retrieval system, communicated or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission. The Australian Peoples’ Tribunal for Community and Nature’s Rights (APT) is an initiative of the Australian Report and Earth Laws Alliance. All inquiries should be directed to the Australian Earth Laws Alliance (AELA). Recommendations https://www.earthlaws.org.au [email protected] Suggested citation: Maloney, M., Boehringer, G., MacCarrick, G., Satija, M., Graham, M. & Williams, R. (2020) 2019 Citizens’ Inquiry into the Health of the Barka / Darling River and Menindee Lakes: Report and Recommendations. Australian Peoples’ Tribunal for Community and Nature’s Rights (APT).
    [Show full text]
  • 9Da613b5d3102136c7af
    CANIE1Q1QA CLU1 FMC. fr$1EWL1ETflR O. Box 160. Canberra. A.C.T. 2601 Registered by Australia Post; Publication number NBH 1859 ASTP. VOLUME 25 MAY 1988 NUMBER 5 PresMextt's Prattle Many members would be aware of the work undertaken by the Kosciusko Huts Association (KHA) and have welcomed the shelter provided by the mountain huts. Indeed over recent months members of CBC have been involved in carrying out repairs to Boltons Hill Hut. At its last meeting the KHA addressed a couple of matters which are likely to be of interest to our membership. The Association's membership decided to award three life memberships in recognition of the work and support provided by three members all od whom also belong to our club. On behalf of the Club. I would like to congratulate Reet Vallak and Bob and Sybil Story - it is great to see such labours recognised. On another matter, the KHA is to work with the ACT Parks and Conservation Service in maintaining a number of huts in the Namadgi National Park- As a starting point, the Association is conducting three maintenance weekends on Frank's Hut just of the Old Boboyan Road. The scheduled weekends are: 21" 22nd of May. 18-19th of June and 2-3rd of July. Any members interested in being involved in this or on projects specific to other Namadgi huts are invited to contact Peter Rose on 282691(h). For those who are interested in finding out more about the Namadgi huts and their history. Graeme Scully from KHA is giving a talk at the National Trust Headquarters in Deakin on Wednesday the 8th of June at 7.30pm.
    [Show full text]