DOCSLIB.ORG

Rostratula Australis (Australian Painted Snipe)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rostratula Australis (Australian Painted Snipe) Invitation to comment on EPBC Act nomination to transfer from the vulnerable category to the endangered category: Rostratula australis (Australian painted snipe) Anyone may nominate a native species, ecological community or threatening process for listing under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). You are invited to provide comment on the attached nomination to assist the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) with its assessment of whether the species is eligible for inclusion in the EPBC Act list of threatened species, and, if eligible, the category in which it is eligible to be included. The Committee welcomes the views of experts, stakeholders and the general public on nominations to further inform its nomination assessment process. In order to determine if a species, ecological community or threatening process is eligible for listing under the EPBC Act, a rigorous scientific assessment of its status is undertaken. These assessments are undertaken by the Committee to determine if an item is eligible for listing against a set of criteria as set out in the guidelines for nominating and assessing threatened species and ecological communities, and threatening processes. These are available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/nominations.html To assist in this matter, the Committee has identified a series of specific questions on which it seeks particular guidance (Part A). The nomination for this species is provided in Part B. Individual nominations may vary considerably in quality. Therefore in addition to the information presented in the nomination, the Committee also takes into account published data and considers other information received when it prepares its advice for the Minister. Responses to this consultation will be provided in full to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. In providing comments, please provide references to published data where possible. Should the Committee use the information you provide in formulating its advice, the information will be attributed to you and referenced as ‘personal communication’ unless you provide references or otherwise attribute this information. The Committee’s advice may be published on the department’s website at completion of the assessment and decision by the Minister. Information provided through consultation may be subject to freedom of information legislation and court processes. It is also important to note that under the EPBC Act, the deliberations and recommendations of the Committee are confidential until the Minister has made a final decision on the nomination, unless otherwise determined by the Minister. The views expressed within the attached nomination (Part B) do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Australian Government. The Australian Government and the Committee do not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of the nomination. Included here for your consideration of the nomination are: Part A Specific questions identified by the Committee Part B Nomination form as submitted Part A – Questions on which the Committee is seeking particular guidance 1. Can you comment on whether or not there is sufficient evidence that this entity is a distinct species? 2. Has the survey effort for this species been adequate to determine its national distribution and adult population size? Has the nomination considered the entire national extent of the species? 3. Is the distribution as described in the nomination valid? 4. Do you accept the estimate of the total population size of the species? 5. Do you consider the way the population size has been derived to be appropriate? 6. Are you aware of any additional evidence/data which show that the population is stable, increasing or declining? 7. Do you agree that the threats listed are correct and that their effects on the species are significant? 8. In seeking to facilitate the recovery of this species, can you provide management advice for the following: a. What individuals or organisations are currently, or need to be, involved in planning to abate threats and are there any other relevant planning issues? b. What threats are impacting on different populations, how variable are the threats and what is the relative importance of the different populations? c. What recovery actions are currently in place, and can you suggest other actions that would help recover the species? Please provide evidence and background information. 9. Can you provide additional data or information relevant to this assessment? 10. Have you been involved in developing this nomination? Part B – Nomination Section 1 - Legal Status, Distribution, Biological, Ecological Conservation Theme How does this nomination relate to the conservation theme? Not applicable - there is no conservation theme for the 2011 assessment period. Taxonomy 2. What are the currently Scientific name: Rostratula australis. accepted scientific and Common name: Australian Painted Snipe. common name/s for the species (please include Indigenous names, where known)? Note any other scientific names that have been used recently. Note the species authority and the Order and Family to which the species belongs (Family name alone is sufficient for plants, however, both Order and Family name are required for insects). 3. Is this species Until recently, the Australian Painted Snipe was considered conventionally accepted? If to be a subspecies of Rostratula benghalensis, a species not, explain why. Is there any that occurs across Africa and Asia (Marchant & Higgins controversy about the 1993). However, Lane & Rogers (2000) recommended taxonomy? treating the subspecies found in Australia (australis) as a full species based on its distinctive appearance, call, measurements and anatomy. Following this, Baker et al (2007) ran mitochondrial DNA sequencing on Painted Snipe and concluded that it is a full species which would have diverged ~19mya ago. Christidis & Boles (2008) have also recognized it as a full species. However the taxon has not been assessed by IUCN because it is not yet recognized as a full species by BirdLife International. They are responsible for the avian section of the IUCN Red List. 4. If the species is NOT conventionally accepted, please provide: (i) a taxonomic description of the species in a form suitable for publication in conventional scientific literature; OR (ii) evidence that a scientific institution has a specimen of the species and a written statement signed by a person who has relevant taxonomic expertise (has worked, or is a published author, on the class of species nominated), that the person thinks the species is a new species. 5. Is this species taxonomically distinct (Taxonomic distinctiveness – a measure of how unique a species is relative to other species)? Legal Status 5. What is the species’ current The current conservation status of the Australian Painted conservation status under Snipe Rostratula australis under Australian and Australian and State/Territory State/Territory Government legislation is as follows: Government legislation? National: Listed as Vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Queensland: Listed as Vulnerable under the Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 as Rostratula benghalensis. New South Wales: Listed as Endangered under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 as Rostratula benghalensis australis. Victoria: Listed as Threatened under the Threatened List 2006 supplementing the Flora and Fauna Guarantee (FFG) Act 1988 as Rostratula benghalensis. South Australia: Listed as Rare under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 (Schedule 9) as Rostratula benghalensis Western Australia: Listed as Rare or Likely to Become Extinct on the Wildlife Conservation (Specially Protected Fauna) Notice 2006(2) as Rostratula benghalensis australis. Northern Territory: Listed as Vulnerable under the Territory Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act 2000 as Rostratula benghalensis australis. 6. Does the species have Listed in the bilateral CAMBA legislation. specific protection (e.g. listed on an annex or appendix) under other legislation or intergovernmental arrangements, e.g. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Fauna and Flora (CITES), Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). Description 7. Give a brief description of the The Australian Painted Snipe is a stocky wading bird around species’ appearance, including 220-250 mm in length with a long pinkish bill. The adult size and/or weight, and sex and female, more colourful than the male, has a chestnut- age variation if appropriate; coloured head, with white around the eye and a white crown social structure and dispersion stripe, and metallic green back and wings, barred with black (e.g. solitary/clumped/flocks). and chestnut. There is a pale stripe extending from the shoulder into a V down its upper back. The adult male is similar to the female, but lacking chestnut in the head, nape and throat. It is generally smaller and duller with buff spots on the wings (New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service 2006). This species is generally seen singly or in pairs, less often in small flocks. Flocking does occur during breeding. Adults sometimes form loose gatherings around each group of nests; flocks may also form after breeding, and at some locations small groups regularly occur (Marchant & Higgins 1993). Groups comprising a male and up to 6 offspring have been recorded (xxx
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for The
    TheCondor97:174-196 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1995 PHYLOGENETIC REANALYSIS OF STRAUCH’S OSTEOLOGICAL DATA SET FOR THE CHARADRIIFORMES PHILIP c. CHU Department of Biology and Museum of Zoology The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Abstract. Strauch’s (1978) compatibility analysisof relationshipsamong the shorebirds (Charadriifonnes) was the first study to examine the full range of charadriifonn taxa in a reproducibleway. SubsequentlyMickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled seriouscharges against Strauch’s characters,method of phylogenetic inference, and results. To account for these charges,Strauch ’s characterswere re-examined and recoded, and parsimony analyseswere performed on the revised matrix. A parsimony analysison 74 taxa from the revised matrix yielded 855 shortesttrees, each length = 286 and consistencyindex = 0.385. In each shortest tree there were two major lineages,a lineageof sandpiper-likebirds and a lineageof plover- like birds; the two formed a monophyletic group, with the auks (Alcidae) being that group’s sister taxon. The shortest trees were then compared with other estimates of shorebird re- lationships, comparison suggestingthat the chargesagainst Strauch’s results may have re- sulted from the Mickevich and Parenti decisions to exclude much of Strauch’s character evidence. Key words: Charadrilformes; phylogeny; compatibility analysis: parsimony analysis; tax- onomic congruence. INTRODUCTION Strauch scored 227 charadriiform taxa for 70 The investigation of evolutionary relationships characters. Sixty-three of the characters were among shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) has a taken from either the skull or postcranial skel- long history (reviewed in Sibley and Ahlquist eton; the remaining seven involved the respec- 1990). Almost all studies used morphology to tive origins of three neck muscles, as published make inferences about shared ancestry; infer- in Burton (1971, 1972, 1974) and Zusi (1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Dieter Thomas Tietze Editor How They Arise, Modify and Vanish
    Fascinating Life Sciences Dieter Thomas Tietze Editor Bird Species How They Arise, Modify and Vanish Fascinating Life Sciences This interdisciplinary series brings together the most essential and captivating topics in the life sciences. They range from the plant sciences to zoology, from the microbiome to macrobiome, and from basic biology to biotechnology. The series not only highlights fascinating research; it also discusses major challenges associated with the life sciences and related disciplines and outlines future research directions. Individual volumes provide in-depth information, are richly illustrated with photographs, illustrations, and maps, and feature suggestions for further reading or glossaries where appropriate. Interested researchers in all areas of the life sciences, as well as biology enthusiasts, will find the series’ interdisciplinary focus and highly readable volumes especially appealing. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/15408 Dieter Thomas Tietze Editor Bird Species How They Arise, Modify and Vanish Editor Dieter Thomas Tietze Natural History Museum Basel Basel, Switzerland ISSN 2509-6745 ISSN 2509-6753 (electronic) Fascinating Life Sciences ISBN 978-3-319-91688-0 ISBN 978-3-319-91689-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91689-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018948152 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Painted-Snipe Rostratula Benghalensis, and Himalayan Region, from Himachal Pradesh to Bhutan
    CORRESPONDENCE 153 There are some isolated records of the species from the Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis, and Himalayan region, from Himachal Pradesh to Bhutan. In Himachal Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola in the Pradesh, Whistler (1926) recorded one bird on 05 May 1922 at Andaman Islands c. 1158m in Kangra. den Besten (2004) recorded seven birds on passage migration at Pong Wetland in the foothills of Kangra. There On 07 March 2018 GK spotted and photographed a Greater have been some recent photographic records of the species from Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis in a marsh at Sippighat Nepal. A bird was photographed at Suklaphanta Wildlife Reserve (11.60ºN, 92.68ºE) [172]. Though widespread on the Indian on 20 April 2010 (Nepal Wildlife 2010) and another, at Chitwan Subcontinent (Ali & Ripley 1983; Grimmett et al. 2011; National Park on 24 September 2014 (Bird Education Society– Rasmussen & Anderton 2012), this was the first time it was Nepal 2014). A juvenile, moulting into first winter plumage, was being reported from the Andaman Islands. It was recorded photographed on 22 September 2015 at Chitwan National Park, subsequently, from there, on 10 March 2018 (Vel 2018). (Giri 2015). The species has also been photographed on 03 November 2013 at Darjeeling, West Bengal (Ghosh 2013). The only record from Bhutan was on 05 May 1992 (Clements 1992; Spierenburg 2005). All these records indicate that the species, probably, undertakes both, spring, and autumn passage migration in small numbers through parts of western and central Himalayas. The present records from Uttarakhand support this hypothesis, though further observation is desirable to conclude its status in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Asian Waterbird Census 2008-2015: Results of Coordinated Counts in Asia and Australasia
    The Asian Waterbird Census 2008-2015: Results of coordinated counts in Asia and Australasia Taej Mundkur, Tom Langendoen and Doug Watkins © Wetlands International 2017 Pages from this publication may be reproduced freely for educational, journalistic, and other non- commercial purposes. Prior permission must be given for all other forms of reproduction. Full credit must always be given to the copyright holder. Taej Mundkur1, Tom Langendoen2 and Doug Watkins3 1 International Waterbird Census Coordinator, Wetlands International 2 International Waterbird Census Data Manager, Wetlands International 3 Chair, EAAFP Monitoring Taskforce; Chair, Australasian Wader Studies Group (a special interest group of BirdLife Australia); Associate Expert, Wetlands International This publication should be cited as follows: Mundkur, T., Langendoen, T. and Watkins, D. (eds.) 2017. The Asian Waterbird Census 2008-2015 - results of coordinated counts in Asia and Australasia. Wetlands International, Ede. Cover photo: Black-tailed Godwit, © Sudheera Bandara The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Wetlands International concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The Asian Waterbird Census 2008-2015 - results of coordinated counts in Asia and Australasia The Asian Waterbird Census is supported by a network of volunteers and coordinated by the following organisations and agencies that work closely with Wetlands International. See www.wetlands.org/our-network/iwc-coordinators for full details Page 2 The Asian Waterbird Census 2008-2015 - results of coordinated counts in Asia and Australasia Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Birds of Western Australia R.E
    Checklist of the Birds of Western Australia R.E. Johnstone and J.C. Darnell Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western Australia 6000 April 2015 ____________________________________ The area covered by this Western Australian Checklist includes the seas and islands of the adjacent continental shelf, including Ashmore Reef. Refer to a separate Checklist for Christmas and Cocos (Keeling) Islands. Criterion for inclusion of a species or subspecies on the list is, in most cases, supported by tangible evidence i.e. a museum specimen, an archived or published photograph or detailed description, video tape or sound recording. Amendments to the previous Checklist have been carried out with reference to both global and regional publications/checklists. The prime reference material for global coverage has been the International Ornithological Committee (IOC) World Bird List, The Clements Checklist of Birds of the World, the Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volume 1 (Lynx Edicions, Barcelona), A Checklist of the Birds of Britain, 8th edition, the Checklist of North American Birds and, for regional coverage, Zoological Catalogue of Australia volume 37.2 (Columbidae to Coraciidae), The Directory of Australian Birds, Passerines and the Working List of Australian Birds (Birdlife Australia). The advent of molecular investigation into avian taxonomy has required, and still requires, extensive and ongoing revision at all levels – family, generic and specific. This revision to the ‘Checklist of the Birds of Western Australia’ is a collation of the most recent information/research emanating from such studies, together with the inclusion of newly recorded species. As a result of the constant stream of publication of new research in many scientific journals, delays of its incorporation into the prime sources listed above, together with the fact that these are upgraded/re-issued at differing intervals and that their authors may hold varying opinions, these prime references, do on occasion differ.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Fauna Assessment.Pdf
    APPENDIX H BORR North and Central Section Targeted Fauna Assessment (Biota, 2019) Bunbury Outer Ring Road Northern and Central Section Targeted Fauna Assessment Prepared for GHD December 2019 BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2020 ABN 49 092 687 119 Level 1, 228 Carr Place Leederville Western Australia 6007 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 1463 Prepared by: V. Ford, R. Teale J. Keen, J. King Document Quality Checking History Version: Rev A Peer review: S. Ford Director review: M. Maier Format review: S. Schmidt, M. Maier Approved for issue: M. Maier This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. This report has been designed for double-sided printing. Hard copies supplied by Biota are printed on recycled paper. Cube:Current:1463 (BORR North Central Re-survey):Documents:1463 Northern and Central Fauna ARI_Rev0.docx 3 BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna 4 Cube:Current:1463 (BORR North Central Re-survey):Documents:1463 Northern and Central Fauna ARI_Rev0.docx BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 9 1.1 Introduction 9 1.2 Methods
    [Show full text]
  • Draft National Recovery Plan for the Australian Painted Snipe Rostratula Australis
    Draft National Recovery Plan for the Australian Painted Snipe Rostratula australis 1 The Species Profile and Threats Database pages linked to this recovery plan is obtainable from: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl Image credit: Two Australian Painted Snipe (Rostratula australis) feeding on Hope Island, Queensland © Graeme Chapman. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2019. The National Recovery Plan for the Australian Painted Snipe (Rostratula australis) is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This report should be attributed as ‘National Recovery Plan for the Australian Painted Snipe (Rostratula australis), Commonwealth of Australia 2019’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents
    [Show full text]
  • Spotting of Rostratula Benghalensis, Greater Painted Snipe at Village Sail Saloon, Tehsil Udhampur Jammu & Kashmir, India
    Journal on New Biological Reports ISSN 2319 – 1104 (Online) JNBR 8(3) 183 – 186 (2019) Published by www.researchtrend.net Spotting of Rostratula benghalensis, Greater Painted Snipe at Village Sail Saloon, Tehsil Udhampur Jammu & Kashmir, India Brinder Kumar Government College for Women Udhampur, Jammu And Kashmir, India Corresponding author: [email protected] | Received: 24 September 2019 | Accepted: 14 December 2019 | How to cite: Kumar B. 2019. Spotting of Rostratula benghalensis, Greater Painted Snipe at Village Sail Saloon, Tehsil Udhampur Jammu & Kashmir, India. J New Biol Rep 8(3): 183- 186. ABSTRACT The present note deals with the spotting of Greater Painted snipe Rostratula benghalensis from a small marshy wetland area of village Sail Saloon Udhampur Jammu & Kashmir. It was the first complete photographic record of Greater Painted snipe from village Sail Saloon Udhampur Jammu & Kashmir. Key words: Rostratula benghalensis, village Sail Saloon, Udhampur, Jammu& Kashmir. INTRODUCTION District Udhampur Jammu and Kashmir (Singh et al. 2013; 2014, Pandotra et al. 2014). The Greater Painted snipe Rostratula benghalensisis a medium sized wader and wide SPECIES DESCRIPTION AND HABIT spread resident at fresh water, vegetated pools and fine swamps, and mangroves of southern and Greater Painted Snipe is a medium-sized, plump central India. This species prefers mainly fresh wading bird. It has a long reddish-brown beak, water marshes with deep pools, ditches with thick slightly decurved at tip and separate white or vegetation, mud patches and mangroves. The genus yellowish and pinkish eye patch. Rounded, buff- Rostratula is a species of wader in the family spotted wings and short tail. White colour of breast Rostratulidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Studies on Bio-Ecology of Pheasant Tailed Jacana, Hydrophasianus Chirurgus in Punjab, Pakistan
    SOME STUDIES ON BIO-ECOLOGY OF PHEASANT TAILED JACANA, HYDROPHASIANUS CHIRURGUS IN PUNJAB, PAKISTAN ZAHID IQBAL KHAN 008-GCU-Ph.D-Z-2005 Department of Zoology Faculty of Sciences GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY Lahore, Pakistan. 2009 SOME STUDIES ON BIO-ECOLOGY OF PHEASANT TAILED JACANA, HYDROPHASIANUS CHIRURGUS IN PUNJAB, PAKISTAN by ZAHID IQBAL KHAN 008-GCU-Ph.D-Z-2005 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ZOOLOGY Department of Zoology Faculty of Sciences GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY Lahore, Pakistan. 2009 ii In the Name of Allah, The Most Compassionate, The Most Merciful This dissertation is dedicated to the memories of my Beloved Parents iv DECLARATION I, Mr. Zahid Iqbal Khan Roll No 008-GCU-Ph.D-Z-2005 student of department of Zoology in the subject of Zoology session 2004-2009, hereby declares that the matter printed in the thesis tilted Some studies on Bio-Ecology of Pheasant Tailed Jacana, Hydrophasianus chirurgus in Punjab, Pakistan is my own work and has not been printed, published and submitted as research work, thesis or publication in any form in any university, Research institution etc in Pakistan or abroad. Dated: ________________________ Zahid Iqbal Khan v RESEARCH COMPLETION CERTIFICATE Certified that the research work contented in this thesis titled “Bio-Ecology of Pheasant Tailed Jacana, Hydrophasianus chirurgus in Punjab, Pakistan has been carried out and completed by Mr. Zahid Iqbal Khan Roll No 008-GCU-Ph.D-Z-2005 under my supervision Supervisor:_____________________________ Prof. Dr. Muhammad Sharif Mughal Co-Supervisor:_____________________________ Prof. Dr. Afsar Mian Chairperson :___________________ Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Gruiformes ~ Charadriiformes ~ Phaethontiformes ~ Eurypygiformes
    Birds of the World part 4 Gruiformes through Eurypygiformes • ORDER GRUIFORMES – cranes, rails, and allies (6 families, 190 species) – Family Sarothruridae – flufftails (12 species) – Family Heliornithidae – finfoots (3 species) – Family Rallidae – rails, crakes, and coots (156 species) – Family Psophiidae – trumpeters (3 species) – Family Gruidae – cranes (15 species) – Family Aramidae – limpkin (1 species) • ORDER CHARADRIIFORMES – shorebirds (19 families, 384 species) – Family Turnicidae – buttonquail (17 species) – Family Burhinidae – stone-curlews or thick-knees (10 species) – Family Chionidae – sheathbills (2 species) – Family Pluvianellidae – Magellanic plover (1 species) – Family Haematopodidae – oystercatchers (12 species) – Family Dromadidae – crab-plover (1 species) – Family Ibidorhynchidae – ibisbill (1 species) – Family Recurvirostridae – stilts and avocets (10 species) – Family Charadriidae – plovers (67 species) – Family Pluvianidae – Egyptian plover (1 species) – Family Rostratulidae – painted-snipes (3 species) – Family Jacanidae – jacanas (8 species) – Family Pedionomidae – plains-wanderer (1 species) – Family Thinocoridae – seedsnipes (4 species) – Family Scolopacidae – sandpipers and snipes (96 species) – Family Glareolidae – coursers and pratincoles (17 species – Family Laridae – gulls, terns, and skimmers (101 species) – Family Stercorariidae – skuas (7 species) – Family Alcidae – auks (25 species) • ORDER PHAETHONTIFORMES (1 family, 3 species) – Family Phaethontidae – tropicbirds (3 species) • ORDER EURYPYGIFORMES
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Birds from the Oligocène Jebel Qatrani Formation, Fayum Province, Egypt
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY • NUMBER 62 Fossil Birds from the Oligocène Jebel Qatrani Formation, Fayum Province, Egypt D. Tab Rasmussen, Storrs L. Olson, and Elwyn L. Simons SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS Washington, D.C. 1987 ABSTRACT Rasmussen, D. Tab, Storrs L. Olson, and Elwyn L. Simons. Fossil Birds from the Oligocène Jebel Qatrani Formation, Fayum Province, Egypt. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, number 62, 20 pages, 15 figures, 1986.•^Fossüs from fluvial deposits of early Oligocène age in Egypt document the earliest known diverse avifauna from Africa, comprising at least 13 families and 18 species. Included are the oldest fossil records of the Musophagidae (turacos), Pandionidae (ospreys), Jacanidae (jacanas), and Balaenicipi- tidae (shoebilled storks). Odier families represented are the Accipitridae (hawks and eagles), Rallidae (rails), Gruidae (cranes), Phoenicopteridae (flamingos), Ardeidae (herons), Ciconiidae (storks), and Phalacrocoracidae (cormorants). A highly distinctive rostrum is described as a new family, Xenerodiopidae, probably most closely related to herons. A humérus lacking the distal end is tentatively referred to the same family. Two new genera and three species of large to very large jacanas are described from the distal ends of tarsometatarsi. This Oligocène avifauna resembles that of modern tropical African assemblages. The habitat preferences of the constituent species of birds indicate a tropical, swampy, vegetation-choked, fresh-water environment at the time of deposition. OFFICIAL PUBLICATION DATE is handsiamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution'! annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIES COVER DESIGN: The trilobitc Phacops rana Green. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Dala Rasmussen, D. Tab Fossil birds from the Oligocène Jebel Qatrani Formation, Fayum Province, Egypt (Smithsonian contributions to paleobiology ; no.
    [Show full text]