DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Mountain Bluebirds Have Disappeared from Western Montana’S Valleys— and Might Never Return

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Mountain Bluebirds Have Disappeared from Western Montana’S Valleys— and Might Never Return TURF WAR TWIST Why mountain bluebirds have disappeared from western Montana’s valleys— and might never return. By Renée A. Duckworth and Alexander V. Badyaev K A N Z O L N I B IN FOR THE DURATION Secure in man-made nesting structures, O R Y B western bluebirds no longer face the historical loss of nesting D R I B trees toppled by age and wind. ﬔe authors maintain that the E U L B boxes are good for this species in western Montana valleys but N R E T don’t benefit, in the long run, mountain bluebirds, which require S E W a cycle of fire and new cavities to colonize low-elevation areas. 30 MARCH ?APRIL 2014 FWP.MT.GOV/MTOUTDOORS MONTANA OUTDOORS 31 1. Periodic forest fires 2. ...the cavities of which bution. We learned that the historical cycle kill low-elevation are excavated by ne morning in March $''', just like trees... in which the two bluebird species displace woodpeckers and then colonized by widely every year for the previous &# years or one another every 20 or so generations has dispersing mountain been disrupted. And the cause, ironically, bluebirds... so, the late Joe Waldbillig—a cattle has been the creation and maintenance of new nesting habitats. began to re-colonize their historical Mon - rancher and self-taught naturalist—was tana range. Just as in times past, the two driving his pickup down the snowy road FIRE-INDUCED CYCLE bluebird species were back. Historically in Montana, western bluebirds HISTORICAL bisecting his western Montana ranch. and mountain bluebirds more or less co - WITNESSING HISTORICAL PATTERNS existed in the forested river valleys west of 20> TO 30>YEAR What was so exciting for us as scientists was ORanging in elevation from %,### to &,### feet, the ranch was the Continental Divide (another species, the the opportunity provided by the bluebird eastern bluebird, lives east of Great Falls). CYCLE boxes to observe the patterns of historical col - a haven for mountain bluebirds, and every day through early The relationship worked like this: Blue - onization and competition between the two birds nest in tree cavities but, unlike wood - species. It was as though the slate had been sprin g Waldbillig drove around the valley looking for signs of peckers, cannot make their own. After a DISRUPTION wiped clean and the birds had to reform their wildfire, woodpeckers colonize burned Bluebird nesting relationships before our very eyes. the birds’ return as indication that the worst of winter was over. boxes create areas, and, in less than a year, numerous permanent homes We documented how newly arriving But that morning, much to his surprise, he such stories of rapid replacement of one cavities in dead and decaying trees provide for western bluebirds. western bluebirds started to rapidly replace came across a bluebird species he had never bluebird species by the other would repeat prime nesting real estate for bluebirds. With no new valley mountain bluebirds in the valleys of west - fires to “re-set” the before seen on his ranch: an industrious itself over and over on our 15 western Mon - The first to arrive are mountain blue - historical cycle, 3. ...which are driven ern Montana. In only 15 to 20 years, we male western bluebird, inspecting nest tana study areas, which included the Wald - birds, more wide-ranging than westerns and mountain bluebirds into the mountains watched many of our research sites go from by the aggressive boxes along the fence. billig ranch, where we monitored these able to find new habitat quickly. Then the are now restricted no bluebirds, to 100 percent mountain to higher elevations. type of western It was a preview of momentous changes. remarkable relationships . Since 1995 we have more aggressive, but less mobile, western bluebirds... bluebirds, to 100 percent western blue - 4. ...which are eventually joined by In just five years, Waldbillig would witness on been investigating competitive interactions bluebirds arrive and outcompete the moun - the peaceful, home-loving type of birds. When we conducted a census of nest - his ranch the near complete takeover of between mountain bluebirds and western tain bluebirds for nest sites. The mountain western bluebirds, until.... ing bluebirds in a popular recreation area mountain bluebirds by the newly arriving bluebirds to understand the mechanisms bluebirds retreat to the mountains, where near Missoula in the early 1990s, all but one western bluebirds. Over the next decade, underlying these dramatic changes in distri - they can survive but western bluebirds can - breeding pair were mountain bluebirds. By not, waiting for the next cycle of valley wild - five or more boxes placed roughly 100 to the early 2000s, the mountain bluebirds fire to re-set the process and start over. This 300 yards apart, often along highways and were gone, completely replaced with a went on for thousands of years. country roads. much higher density of western bluebirds. But starting around the late 1930s, the As hoped, bluebird populations began to Five years ago, the western bluebird was a western Montana river valley landscape recover. First mountain bluebirds reclaimed rare visitor in the Blackfoot-Clearwater changed more drastically than at any time their historical lower-elevation areas. Then Wildlife Management Area near Ovando. since the last ice age. Many bottomland western bluebirds, which had retreated to Today the bird is common throughout the M O C forests were logged and replaced with lush bottomland refuges farther west and south, entire Blackfoot Valley. K C O T S fields of wheat, alfalfa, and other crops. R E T T U Forest fires were suppressed. Populations of H S : E C R western bluebirds, a species generally U O S S confined to lower-elevation valleys, were With trees no longer C I H P A R devastated by the loss of nesting cavities. By G E L C dominating the valley Y the mid-1940s they had nearly disappeared C L A C I R from Montana. Although mountain blue - O T floors as in the past and S I H birds also lost nesting sites, they had evolved ; V E A Y D to also use habitats at higher elevations, A no periodic “re-setting” B . V R where forests remained largely intact. E D N A X In the early 1970s, conservation-minded of the cycle by natural E L A : S O Montanans began an ambitious effort to T O H P wildfires, the dynamics X restore low-elevation bluebirds by nailing O B D R I wooden nest boxes to fence posts. Over the B E of coexistence between U L B next several decades, volunteers with the PERIODIC VALLEY VISITOR Historically mountain bluebirds lived in low-elevation areas for D N A E nonprofit group Mountain Bluebird Trails G several years until driven into high country by aggressive western bluebirds. ﬔe situation would A these two species have P E T remain static until old snags toppled, driving out the western bluebirds, and forest fires I placed more than 8,000 nesting structures S O P P created new dead trees that attracted the more widely dispersing mountain bluebirds. O along what are known as bluebird “trails”— fundamentally changed. 32 MARCH ?APRIL 2014 FWP.MT.GOV/MTOUTDOORS MONTANA OUTDOORS 33 For the time being, it seems that western bluebirds will dominate low elevations and mountain bluebirds will be restricted to the high country. We set out to find out why western blue - ulation, a young male western bluebird has must stay on the nest to keep eggs or Is there a way to “re-set” dynamics of coexistence between these tain bluebirds beforehand, as occurs in low- birds are so successful at displacing moun - two choices—either assist his parents in rais - nestlings warm during the cold, she can’t two species have fundamentally changed. lying areas. Unfortunately for the species, the tain bluebirds and found an important ing their young and then inherit a part of their forage on her own. Nonaggressive males the historical cycle so eggs or nestlings of the pushy western male behavioral difference. Western bluebirds are territory (and thereafter nest near his birth - bring her nearly all her food during these BOXED OUT and his mate quickly perish in the harsh more aggressive and also breed at higher place), or disperse and compete for a territory times, and consequently the family’s broods that mountain bluebirds Without question, nesting boxes have been a mountainous conditions. The western blue - densities. Once they arrive in an area and in a new area. We found that the strategy a tend to survive the nesting season storms. boon to bluebirds. Without them, we’d see birds’ Achilles’ heel—the inability of aggres - start to breed, they crowd out mountain male pursues depends closely on his aggres - Aggressive males, on the other hand, might make their way very few western bluebirds in Montana. But sive males to feed their incubating and bluebirds. This, we discovered, is because siveness. Belligerent males are more likely to hardly ever feed their mates, so their nests back to the valleys of they have had unintended consequences. brooding females during late-spring snow - the westerns have two distinct behavioral leave their home ground and disperse to new rarely survive late-spring cold snaps. This The constant nature of the man-made struc - storms—creates a safe haven for mountain strategies that allow them to successfully areas to breed, while peace-loving males re - greatly limits the western bluebird’s ability western Montana? tures, replaced by bluebird fans as soon as bluebirds at higher elevations. colonize habitats newly created by fire and, main in their natal population and eventually to establish in a new area until enough mel - they break down, has disrupted the natural Is there a way to “re-set” the historical at the same time, maintain previously estab - acquire a territory near relatives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attracting Bluebirds 1.Mount Nest Boxes
    Bluebirds A gentle bird with brilliant blue plumage, the bluebird has endeared itself to people across the country. Bluebird populations, like many other birds, have declined over the last century due primarily to loss of habitat caused by development. Bluebirds nest in tree cavities, and the loss or destruction of old, decaying trees has reduced the availability of suitable nesting sites and increased competition with other cavity-nesting birds. Bluebird Natural History There are three species of bluebirds in North America: Eastern, Western, and Mountain. The various species differ mostly in territory and feather color. The males of all three species are brilliant blue on the head and back, with varying amounts of white and rust on their neck and breast. Female bluebirds are less bright, with more gray-brown coloring on the back and blue highlights on the wings and tail. Bluebirds feed on a large variety of insects, arthropods, and invertebrates, The Eastern bluebird is one of three species of bluebirds found in North including spiders, caterpillars, and grasshoppers. Bluebirds perch on posts, America. Bluebirds are cavity nesters, and can be attracted to your property wires, or branches while scanning for insects. Watch for the bluebird’s by installing nest boxes. characteristic behavior of flying down from its perch to catch prey and then returning to the original perch to eat. In winter, bluebirds are dependent upon berries to supplement their diet. Bluebirds prefer open habitats, such as meadows, parks, orchards, farm fields, and golf courses. They often spend the winter in woodlands or groves. Ranges Eastern Bluebirds are in all states east of the Rockies, from southern Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Bluebird, EC 1571
    EC 1571 • April 2005 $1.00 Western Bluebird Sialia mexicana by L. Schumacher and S. Sells an you imagine eating bugs and berries and living inside a tree? Why bluebirds CWestern bluebirds do just that! They are members of the thrush family, need our help meaning that they are related to robins. Populations of western bluebirds There are three species, or kinds, of have declined over the past 50 years. bluebirds in the United States: the East- The main reason for their decline is ern bluebird, the Western bluebird, and competition for nest holes from the mountain bluebird. Both Western and European starlings and English house mountain bluebirds live in Oregon. sparrows. Starlings and house spar- Bluebirds eat mostly insects. Grass- rows are exotic species, meaning they hoppers, earthworms, snails, and beetles came from somewhere else and donʼt are among their favorite foods. They sit occur naturally in North America. These on perches and drop quickly to the ground birds were brought here (introduced) to catch food or they can catch insects in and have multiplied quickly. They out- the air. Bluebirds also eat fruit and ber- compete many of our native birds for ries, especially during the winter when nesting habitat. there are fewer insects. Another reason for bluebird decline is loss of habitat due to the cutting of dead trees and suppression of fi re. Fires are important for maintaining oak wood- lands with open meadows. Without fi re, dense forests of fi r trees can take over. Raccoons and house cats may be part of the cause of bluebird decline because they prey on bluebirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds of the Estero Bay Area
    Common Birds of the Estero Bay Area Jeremy Beaulieu Lisa Andreano Michael Walgren Introduction The following is a guide to the common birds of the Estero Bay Area. Brief descriptions are provided as well as active months and status listings. Photos are primarily courtesy of Greg Smith. Species are arranged by family according to the Sibley Guide to Birds (2000). Gaviidae Red-throated Loon Gavia stellata Occurrence: Common Active Months: November-April Federal Status: None State/Audubon Status: None Description: A small loon seldom seen far from salt water. In the non-breeding season they have a grey face and red throat. They have a long slender dark bill and white speckling on their dark back. Information: These birds are winter residents to the Central Coast. Wintering Red- throated Loons can gather in large numbers in Morro Bay if food is abundant. They are common on salt water of all depths but frequently forage in shallow bays and estuaries rather than far out at sea. Because their legs are located so far back, loons have difficulty walking on land and are rarely found far from water. Most loons must paddle furiously across the surface of the water before becoming airborne, but these small loons can practically spring directly into the air from land, a useful ability on its artic tundra breeding grounds. Pacific Loon Gavia pacifica Occurrence: Common Active Months: November-April Federal Status: None State/Audubon Status: None Description: The Pacific Loon has a shorter neck than the Red-throated Loon. The bill is very straight and the head is very smoothly rounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Species List Mourning Dove Zenaida Macroura
    Wildlife Species List Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Order: Strigiformes (Nocturnal Flesh Eaters) Northeast Nevada – Units 106 Family: Tytonidae (Barn Owls) Barn Owl Tyto alba (Subalpine Coniferous, P-J, Sagebrush Family: Strigidae (Owls) Steppe, Salt Desert Scrub Habitat, Some Flammulated Owl Otus flammeolus Western Screech-Owl Otus kennicottii Limited Riparian) Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus Northern Pygmy-Owl Glaucidium gnoma Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia Long-eared Owl Asio otus Birds Northern Saw-whet Owl Aegolius acadicus Order: Ciconiiformes (Long-leg Waders, etc) Order: Caprimulgiformes (Night Jars) Family: Cathartidae (New World Vultures) Family: Caprimulgidae (Goatsuckers) Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor California Condor Gymnogyps californianus(L.E.) Common Poorwill Phalaenoptilus nuttallii Order: Falconiformes (Diurnal Flesh Eaters) Order: Apodiformes (Small Fast Fliers) Family: Accipitridae (Hawks, Eagles, Osprey) Family: Apodidae (Swifts) Bald Eagle Haliaetus leucocephalus White-throated Swift Aeronautes saxatalis Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus Family: Trochilidae (Hummingbirds) Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus Black-chinned Hummingbird Archilochus alexandri Cooper’s Hawk Accipiter cooperii Broad-tailed Hummingbird Selasphorus platycercus Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis Red-shouldered Hawk Buteo lineatus Broad-winged Hawk Buteo platypterus Order: Piciformes (Cavity Builders) Swainson's Hawk Buteo swainsoni Family: Picidae (Woodpeckers) Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis Lewis’
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Communities of Gambel Oak: a Descriptive Analysis
    United States Department of Agriculture Bird Communities Forest Service Rocky Mountain of Gambel Oak: A Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-48 Descriptive Analysis March 2000 Andreas Leidolf Michael L. Wolfe Rosemary L. Pendleton Abstract Leidolf, Andreas; Wolfe, Michael L.; Pendleton, Rosemary L. 2000. Bird communities of gambel oak: a descriptive analysis. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-48. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 30 p. Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii Nutt.) covers 3.75 million hectares (9.3 million acres) of the western United States. This report synthesizes current knowledge on the composition, structure, and habitat relationships of gambel oak avian communities. It lists life history attributes of 183 bird species documented from gambel oak habitats of the western United States. Structural habitat attributes important to bird-habitat relationships are identified, based on 12 independent studies. This report also highlights species of special concern, provides recommendations for monitoring, and gives suggestions for management and future research. Keywords: Avian ecology, bird-habitat relationships, neotropical migrant, oakbrush, oak woodlands, scrub oak, Quercus gambelii, Western United States The Authors ______________________________________ Andreas Leidolf is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife at Utah State University (USU). He received a B.S. degree in Forestry/Wildlife Management from Mississippi State University in 1995. He is currently completing his M.S. degree in Fisheries and Wildlife ecology at USU. Michael L. Wolfe is a Professor in the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife at USU. He received a B.S. degree in Wildlife Management at Cornell University in 1963 and his doctorate in Forestry/Wildlife Management at the University of Göttingen, Germany, in 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • Nest Site Selection in Mountain Bluebirds
    NEST SITE SELECTION IN MOUNTAIN BLUEBIRDS CHRISTOPHER J. HERLUGSON ABSTRACT.-Nest site selection was analyzed for a Mountain Bluebird (Sia- lia currucoides) population using two different types of nest box in south- central Washington. The majority of adult females successful in fledging young during the previous year either returned to the same territory and nest box or selected the same type of nest box if they changed territories. If they were unsuccessful, adult females tended to change territories and box types. Most male and female bluebirds breeding for the first time selected the same type of box as housed their natal nest even though none of these birds re- turned to its natal territory. Nest site selection and breeding area fidelity were influenced by age, sex, previous breeding experience, and natal nest type. Recently, Cink (1976) examined the degree printing on the natal type of nest site was to which nestling House Sparrows (Passer not important. domesticus) imprinted on the type of struc- I theorized that imprinting on the natal ture housing their natal nest. Although he type of nest site would be important for sec- found no evidence that early learning or im- ondary cavity-nesting species because of printing had any effect on nest site selec- the scarcity of natural cavities and that tion, females tended to choose hole-type species-specific differences could influence nests over open nests. Other studies have nest site selection. To test these theories, I shown that some species prefer a larger to examined breeding data for a Mountain a smaller nest box (Jarvinen 1978) and that Bluebird (Sialia currucoides) population floor dimensions of a box can influence using two different types of nest box and clutch size (Karlsson and Nilsson 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Bluebird
    Mountain Bluebird By Morgan Stewart 1 Table of Contents Idaho’s State Bird 3 Identification 4 Behavior 5 Habitat 6 Nesting 7 Species 8 Media Attributions 9 Questions 10 Glossary 11 Works Referenced 12 2 Idaho’s State Bird Idaho adopted the Mountain Bluebird as their state bird in 1931. It was suggested by Idaho school children to be considered as the state bird. This bluebird gets its name because it lives in the mountains of Western North America. For most of the year, this Mountain Bluebird will remain in the northern areas of Idaho. When the seasons change to winter, the Mountain Bluebird will fly south to live in southern California and northern Mexico to enjoy the warm weather! http://barnowlbox.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Blue-Bird-Map.jpg 3 Identification Mountain Bluebirds are fairly small thrush songbirds, typically having round heads and straight, thin bills. Compared with other bluebirds they are lanky and long- winged, with a long tail. You can identify the difference between a male and female Mountain Bluebird by their coloring. A male Mountain Bluebird is blue and will have a white underside. A female Mountain Bluebird is brown and will have pale blue wings and tail. Mountain Bluebirds’ bills are entirely black. Juveniles have fewer spots than the young of other bluebirds. Featured image: Mountain bluebird. Credit: iStock/RC Keller http://www.worldsciencefestival.com/2014/11/state-bird-extinct-2080/ 4 Behavior Mountain Bluebirds behavior is unlike any other bluebird species. Mountain Bluebirds will hover low over the grass in open fields and search for food.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Record of Eastern Bluebird (Sialia Sialis) in British Columbia
    The First Record of Eastern Bluebird (Sialia sialis) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Don Cecile. Submitted: April 15, 2018. Introduction and Distribution The Eastern Bluebird (Sialia sialis) is a beautiful thrush that is found across eastern North America and south into Central America (Gowaty and Plissner 2015). There are 7 subspecies of the Eastern Bluebird of which only 2 are found in North America (Phillips 1991, Clements et al. 2017). The nominate subspecies of the Eastern Bluebird is (Sialia sialis sialis) is found throughout eastern North America and is the only subspecies that is highly migratory (Phillips 1991, Clements et al. 2017). In Canada the Eastern Bluebird is found breeding from south-central Saskatchewan, primarily eastern parklands, occasionally north to Saskatoon and Greenwater Lake districts (Smith 1996b), southern Manitoba, north to about 52°N (Artuso et al. 2014), across central Ontario, (Alderfer 2006), into southern Quebec and occurs in all regions south of about 50°N, more widespread along the Canadian Shield and Appalachians; northernmost records are from Abitibi, Gouin Reservoir, North Shore, Rupert Bay lowlands (Gauthier and Aubry 1996b), and locally occurs in New Brunswick with birds more most abundant in the eastern portion of the province (Alderfer 2006), also found on Prince Edward Island (Dunn and Alderfer 2011), and in central and southwestern Nova Scotia (Godfrey 1986). In the United States, the Eastern Bluebird breeds throughout the eastern part of the country from New England south to south-central Florida (Sibley 2000, Dunn and Alderfer 2011), but is absent from the extreme southern areas of the State and the Florida Keys; (Stevenson and Anderson 1994b).
    [Show full text]
  • UK-First-Breeding-Register.Pdf
    INTRODUCTION TO EDITION The original author and compiler of this record, Dave Coles has devoted a great deal of his time in creating a unique reference document which I am privileged to continue working with. By its very nature the document in a living project which will continue to grow and evolve and I can only hope and wish that I have the dedication as Dave has had in ensuring the continuity of the “First Breeding Register”. Initially all my additions and edits will be indicated in italics though this will not be used in the main body of the record (when a new record is added). Simon Matthews (2011) It is over eighty years since Emilius Hopkinson collated his RECORDS OF BIRDS BRED IN CAPTIVITY, which formed the starting point for my attempt at recording first breeding records for the UK. Since the first edition of my records was published in 1986, classification has changed several times and the present edition incorporates this up-dated classification as well as first breeding recorded since then. The research needed to produce the original volume took many years to complete and covered most avicultural literature. Since that time numerous people have kept me abreast of further breedings and pointing out those that have slipped the net. This has hopefully enabled the records to be kept up-to- date. To those I would express my thanks as indeed I do to all that have cast their eyes over the new list and passed comments, especially the ever helpful Reuben Girling who continues to pass on enquiries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hybrid Eastern Bluebird X Mountain Bluebird.--On 28 June 1967 Robert W
    684 General Notes [Auk, Vol. 85 Wisconsin,using techniques described elsewhere (Enderson and Berger,op. cit.). Total pesticideresidues in the four sampleswere 130, 717, 754, and 2435 ppm (fat basis) with a mean of 1009 ppm. The lowest value is less than half the lowest found in adult female fat from nine Peregrinesin the Mackenzie River in 1966 (Enderson and Berger, op. cit.) and the highest,greater than any reported for this species,is four times greater than the top level in the Mackenzie samples. However, our lowest sam- ple is similar to the lowest of four from Yukon River females in 1966 (Cade et al. unpublisheddata) and the highest,from a bird caring for three small young, is about 60 per cent greaterthan Cade'shighest.--J^•Es H. Em)ERSO•,Department o/ Biology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903, D^vm G. Ros•^u, ^•I) L. G. SW^RTZ,College o/ Biological Sciencesand Renewable Resources,University o! Alaska, College,Alaska 99735. A hybrid Eastern Bluebird X Mountain Bluebird.--On 28 June 1967 Robert W. Nero, W. Harvey Beck, and I collecteda hybrid between the Eastern Bluebird (Sialia sialis) and the Mountain Bluebird (S. currucoides)at a nest box in south- western Manitoba about 40 miles west of Brandon. Determination was made by Dr. Nero, and the specimenwas depositedin the Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature in Winnipeg. The hybrid, a male, has red feathers,blue feathers,and blue feathers with red tips on both throat and breast,and is midway in generalsize betweenthe Eastern and Mountain bluebird. Its measurementsare as follows: culmen 11.8, tarsus 20.5, wing (chord) 104.3, tail 66.5 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Sialia Currucoides) Susan L
    Ethology Parental Effort in Relation to Structural Plumage Coloration in the Mountain Bluebird (Sialia currucoides) Susan L. Balenger1, L. Scott Johnson1, Jessica L. Brubaker & Emilene Ostlind Department of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA Correspondence Abstract S. L. Balenger, Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA. Indicator models of sexual selection suggest that costly ornaments signal E-mail: [email protected] reliable information regarding an individual’s quality to potential mates. In species that produce altricial offspring, the amount of parental care Received: November 20, 2006 provided by both males and females can impact reproductive success. Initial acceptance: January 19, 2007 The Good Parent Hypothesis proposes that ornamentation in biparental Final acceptance: April 12, 2007 species can act as an honest signal of parental ability to potential mates. (S.A. Foster) We tested this hypothesis using the mountain bluebird (Sialia currucoides), doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01386.x a sexually dichromatic, socially monogamous species in which both sexes have structurally based ornamental plumage coloration. A male’s plumage color predicted neither the rate at which it provisioned nest- lings nor brood growth rate. The same was true for females. We also found no indication of assortative mating by color or body condition. Feeding rates within pairs were positively correlated, which we suggest may be due to pairs responding similarly to the perceived needs of nest- lings or to local area prey availability. In sum, our results do not support the Good Parent Hypothesis as an explanation for the evolution of orna- mental plumage color in mountain bluebirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Bluebird Activity Book
    fascinating facts © puzzles © pictures © coloring © Stories Children’s Bluebird CTIVITY OOK A B MYRNA PEARMAN and PAULINE MOUSSEAU credits © 2007 Myrna Pearman and Pauline Mousseau Reproduction of this booklet is permitted for educational, non-commercial use provided appropriate acknowledgement is made. Copyright for photographs are held by individual photographers as credited on the proceeding page. Publisher Mountain Bluebird Trails, Inc. Box 794 Ronan, MT 59864 Writing: Myrna Pearman Graphic Design and Layout: Pauline Mousseau Our thanks to the following reviewers: • Bob Niebuhr • Dr. Harry Power, III • Donna Hagerman • Nicole Bailey • Erv Davis • Maddison Pearman • Brandee Massey • Kristi Dubois, (Native Species Coordinator, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks) • Kathern Mounteer • Gene Pyles Funded by Funding for this project was generously provided by the Thomas and Stacey Siebel Foundation. To learn more about this foundation visit: www.siebelscholars.com Dedication Dedicated to the memory of Art Aylesworth, founder of Mountain Bluebird Trails, Inc., and whose dream it was to inspire the next generation of bluebirders. 2 photo credits All photos are used with permission. Photos in booklet are by Myrna Pearman, unless noted below: Front Cover: Top right, Maridith Denton Page 5: Bottom, Lorne Scott Page 7: Tom Ulrich Page 8: Jane Brockway Page 9 Top left, Don Marble and top right, Lorne Scott Page 15: Jane Brockway Page 17: Top and middle, Lorne Scott Page 20: Top, Jane Brockway Page 26: Middle, Jane Brockway Page 27: All pictures on page, Jane Brockway Page 28: Top, Scott Johnson and middle, Jane Brockway Illustrations Illustrations by Gary Ross (from Mountain Bluebird Trail Monitoring Guide, used with permission by Red Deer River Naturalists) Coloring Illustrations by Nicole Ruuska, www.nicoleruuska.com 3 what’s inside Topic Page Introduction to Bluebirds………………………….
    [Show full text]