Lonmin Annual Report 2009 File 22
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Parker Review
Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people. -
Media Release 23 September 2014 Letter to the Editor
Lonmin Plc 4 Grosvenor Place London SW1X 7YL United Kingdom T: +44 (0)20 7201 6000 F: +44 (0)20 7201 6100 Media Release www.lonmin.com 23 September 2014 Letter to the Editor - Mail and Guardian The M&G's story on Lonmin's historic tax affairs published on Friday 19 September 2014 contained significant inaccuracies and material omissions. Disappointingly, the lengthy answers provided to the M&G’s detailed questions were not reported. Any suggestion of potential illegality around Lonmin’s historic tax affairs is seriously damaging to the Company's reputation, not least because such allegations are wholly and absolutely false. The following facts and context, missing from the published article, are vital in judging its accuracy. 1. The Western Metal Sales (WMS) structure referred to was a structure not uncommon to old world conglomerates. The structure was in no way illegal and did not benefit Lonmin from a tax perspective as Lonmin remained liable for the payment of taxes in the UK arising from legitimate and reasonable commissions paid to Western Metal Sales. 2. This structure was changed in 2007 when Lonmin took a decision to move its marketing services to South Africa. 3. The move was based on cost concerns (having a company registered in Bermuda and operating out of London was expensive) and resulted in marketing personnel being based closer to Lonmin’s operations. 4. A transitional arrangement was put in place for 18 months and thereafter, from 1 October 2008, the marketing commission paid to Lonmin Management Services (LMS) was entirely taxable in South Africa. -
Assessing the Potential Impact of the Marikana Incident on South African Mining Companies: an Event Method Study
586 SAJEMS NS 18 (2015) No 4:586-607 ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE MARIKANA INCIDENT ON SOUTH AFRICAN MINING COMPANIES: AN EVENT METHOD STUDY Nicholas Hill and Warren Maroun School of Accountancy, University of the Witwatersrand Accepted: July 15 Abstract This study examines the potential impact of industrial unrest and the outbreak of violence at Marikana on 16 August 2012 on the share prices of mining companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) using an event methodology. Contrary to expectations, the Marikana incident does not appear to have had a widespread and prolonged effect on the South African mining sector. This may be the result of the strike action already having been discounted into the price of mining shares, implying that the market was only reacting to the unusually violent (but short-lived) protest. Alternately, the results could be indicative of investor confidence in the corporate social responsibility initiatives of the South African mining industry as a whole. This paper is the first to examine the potential impact of the Marikana incident on the share prices of mining companies listed on the JSE. It should be of interest to both academics and practitioners wanting to understand how share prices react to exogenous events. It is also relevant for corporate-governance researchers concerned with the relevance of social and governance practices in a South African setting. This research is faced with the limitations associated with most statistical research: that causality cannot be ascribed to tested relationships. Notwithstanding these limitations, it is argued that these findings are important, given the significant coverage of the Marikana incident and the ongoing debate on the need for corporate social responsibility. -
Key Trends in the Resource Sustainability of Platinum Group Elements
Ore Geology Reviews 46 (2012) 106–117 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev Key trends in the resource sustainability of platinum group elements Gavin M. Mudd ⁎ Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Melbourne, Australia article info abstract Article history: Platinum group elements (PGEs) are increasingly used in a variety of environmentally-related technologies, Received 6 November 2011 such as chemical process catalysts, catalytic converters for vehicle exhaust control, hydrogen fuel cells, Received in revised form 3 February 2012 electronic components, and a variety of specialty medical uses, amongst others — almost all of which have Accepted 3 February 2012 strong expected growth to meet environmental and technological challenges this century. Economic Available online 11 February 2012 geologists have been arguing on the case of abundant geologic resources of PGEs for some time while others still raise concerns about long-term supply — yet there remains no detailed analysis of formally reported Keywords: Platinum group elements (PGEs) mineral resources and key trends in the PGEs sector. This paper presents such a detailed review of the Economic mineral resources PGEs sector, including detailed mine production statistics and mineral resources by principal ore types, pro- Mineral resource sustainability viding an authoritative case study on the resource sustainability for a group of elements which are uniquely Bushveld Complex concentrated in a select few regions of the earth. The methodology, compiled data sets and trends provide Great Dyke strong assurance on the contribution that PGEs can make to the key sustainability and technology challenges – Noril'sk Talnakh of the 21st century such as energy and pollution control. -
Glencore Plc FURTHER DETAILS of the LONMIN DISTRIBUTION FOR
THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this document, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this document. Glencore plc (Stock code: 805) FURTHER DETAILS OF THE LONMIN DISTRIBUTION FOR HONG KONG GLENCORE SHAREHOLDERS ONLY This document is a supplement to the Notice of Annual General Meeting of Glencore (the AGM Notice) made available to its shareholders holding shares on Glencore plc’s (Glencore or the Company) Hong Kong branch register or who have registered addresses in Hong Kong (together Hong Kong Glencore Shareholders) on 2 April 2015. 2 April 2015 1 EXPECTED TIMETABLE OF PRINCIPAL EVENTS FOR HONG KONG GLENCORE SHAREHOLDERS Other than in respect to the date and time for the Glencore annual general meeting, the dates and times given in the table below in connection with the Lonmin distribution are indicative and are based on Glencore’s current expectations and may be subject to change (including being conditional on the passing of Resolution 3 in the AGM Notice dated 2 April 2015). If any of the times and/or dates below change, the revised times and/or dates will be notified to Glencore shareholders through a Regulatory Information Service and be subject to separate announcement(s) published on http://www.hkexnews.hk/. All references in this document to times and dates are to Central European Summer Time (CEST) times and dates unless otherwise stated. -
CRR 446/2002 a Study of the Provision of Health and Safety Information in the Annual Reports of the Top UK Companies
HSE Health & Safety Executive A study of the provision of health and safety information in the annual reports of the top UK companies Prepared by System Concepts Ltd for the Health and Safety Executive CONTRACT RESEARCH REPORT 446/2002 HSE Health & Safety Executive A study of the provision of health and safety information in the annual reports of the top UK companies Laura Peebles, Ansgar Kupper and Tanya Heasman System Concepts Ltd 2 Savoy Court Strand London WC2R 0EZ This report details the findings of a research project to investigate the quality and quantity of health and safety information found in the annual reports of the top UK companies. At present, publicly listed companies are not legally required to include health and safety matters in their annual reports. The current Health and Safety Commission (HSC) Strategy Statement, however, contains an action point which focuses on public reporting of health and safety issues by larger companies. The aim is to promote the reporting of health and safety information in company annual reports and to provide guidance that would allow reporting of such information to a common standard. To assist the HSC with this strategy, System Concepts were commissioned by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to undertake an investigation of the provision of health and safety information in company annual reports. The study comprised a series of steps. The main objectives of the study were: i) To determine the current level of reporting of health and safety issues in annual reports of the top UK companies ii) To determine the quality of health and safety information reported. -
Annual General Meeting 2019 Notice of Meeting and Explanatory Notes
This document is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in any doubt as to any aspect of the proposals referred to in this document or as to the action you should take, you should seek your own advice from a stockbroker, solicitor, accountant, or other independent professional adviser duly authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your ordinary shares, please pass this document together with the accompanying Form of Proxy to the purchaser or transferee, or to the person who arranged the sale or transfer, so they can pass these documents to the person who now holds the ordinary shares. Annual General Meeting 2019 Notice of Meeting and Explanatory Notes This document contains Notice of the Annual General Meeting of TT Electronics plc (the “Company”) to be held at the offices of Allen & Overy LLP, One Bishops Square, London E1 6AD on Thursday 9 May 2019 at 10.00am, together with explanatory notes regarding the business of the meeting. The Board considers that all the resolutions to be put to the meeting are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole and recommends that you vote in favour of all the resolutions. Whether or not you propose to attend the Annual General Meeting, please complete and submit a Form of Proxy in accordance with the instructions printed on the enclosed form. The Form of Proxy must be received by the Company’s registrars, Equiniti Limited, Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing, West Sussex BN99 6DA, as soon as possible, and in any event no later than 10.00am on Tuesday 7 May 2019. -
Strassmann, Inc. Global Information Productivity® Rankings © Copyright 1997, All Rights Reserved
Strassmann, Inc. Global Information Productivity® Rankings © Copyright 1997, All Rights Reserved This document contains selected 1995 Information Productivity® rankings from industrial companies in Strassmann, Inc.’s database of 8,600 global firms. The 1996 ranking of industrial firms will appear in The Productivity of Information Management , The Information Economics Press, 1998. Definitions Rank: Information Productivity (IP) rankings of 510 industrial firms, with employment of over 15,000 and satisfying a number of financial criteria. Information Management Expenses: Sales, General, Administrative, Research and Development costs. Profits: Net Income after Income Taxes, before Preferred Dividends About Strassmann, Inc. Strassmann, Inc. offers Information Productivity Assessment services to firms wishing to benchmark their performance. Comparisons are made against look-alike firms as well as competitors. Ten year trend analysis in factors contributing to Information Productivity are included in each case. For further information and analytical services, send email to [email protected], or visit our web site, http://www.strassmann.com Available Services 1. Information Productivity ® Assessment Ranking a firm’s information management performance as compared with look- alike organizations. Includes: Ten year analysis of trends, ratio of information to finance costs, correlation with standard measures of financial performance and tabulation of over- or under-performance relative to industry peer group. Detects shifts from labor to capital-intensive information work. Application: Diagnostic method for justifying, planning and budgeting expenditures for information resources. 2. Knowledge Capital ® Assessment Ranking a firm’s performance in terms of is accumulation of knowledge assets as compared with-alike organizations. Includes: Ten year trend analyses, ratio of finance and knowledge capital, comparisons with market valuation (if available) and valuation of employees as assets and not as an expense. -
Massacre of Workers at the Marikana Mine
CASE Nº17 Lonmin Company South Africa Platinum mine Massacre of workers IFC at the Marikana Mine On August 10, 2012, thousands of miners went on fire on the striking miners, shooting 112, and killing strike at the Marikana platinum mine, just north 34.6 What quickly became known as the Marikana of Johannesburg, South Africa. The workers were Massacre was the bloodiest use of force by the South demanding fair wages and better working and living African government since apartheid’s Sharpeville conditions. The strike was a wildcat strike, organized Massacre in 1960.7 without the backing of the main union, the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), which many workers During the fateful events of August 2012, IFC held believed was in league with the mine owner, British- US$50 million of equity shares in Lonmin’s platinum based Lonmin Company. mines in Marikana.8 The initial investment, made in 2007, was the institution’s largest to date in Marching workers demanded an audience with Lonmin Sub-Saharan Africa and a showcase for community management, but Lonmin refused to negotiate outside development.9 Fifteen million dollars was earmarked of official bargaining structures.1 The next day, as both for “the development of a comprehensive, large Lonmin and NUM demanded workers return to work, scale community and local economic development tensions rose and strikers carrying traditional spears program.”10 IFC provided three years of advisory and sticks began intimidating workers to join the strike. services to boost Lonmin’s capacity in four key Lonmin -
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Lonmin for 2018
Lonmin Plc / 107 Annual Report and Accounts 2018 Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Lonmin Plc 1 Our opinion is unmodified Strategic Report We have audited the financial statements of Lonmin Plc (“the Company”) for the year ended 30 September 2018 which comprise the Consolidated Income Statement, the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, the Company Balance Sheet, the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, Company Statement of Changes in Equity, the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and the related notes, including the accounting policies in note 1. In our opinion: • the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the parent Company’s affairs as at 30 September 2018 and of the Group’s profit for the year then ended; • the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRSs as adopted by the EU); Governance • the parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK accounting standards, including FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework; and • the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (“ISAs (UK)”) and applicable law. Our responsibilities are described below. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is a sufficient and appropriate basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion is consistent with our report to the audit committee. -
RMC Group P.L.C. Annual Report and Accounts 2001
2001 FC R&A 20/3/03 12:23 pm Page 1 RE P O R T RMC Group p.l.c. Annual Report and Accounts 2001 The RMC Group is a multinational Financial highlights 1 enterprise operating across four Segmental analysis 1 2001 Operational statistics 2 continents, fulfilling the demand Group activities 3 for building materials – concrete, Chairman’s review 4 Chief Executive’s review 5 aggregates and cement. Environmental and social review 8 Finance Director’s review 12 Board of Directors 14 Board committees 16 Directors’ report 17 Remuneration report 21 Report of the Auditors 26 Accounting policies 27 Directors’ responsibilities in relation to financial statements 29 Group profit and loss account 30 Group balance sheet 31 Parent company balance sheet 32 Group cash flow statement 33 Statement of total recognised gains and losses 34 Movements in shareholders’ equity funds 34 Notes to the accounts 35 Group financial review 59 Principal subsidiary undertakings, Registered Number: 249776 Registered Office: joint ventures and associated undertakings 60 RMC House, Coldharbour Lane, Thorpe, Egham, Surrey TW20 8TD, United Kingdom Supplementary financial information in Euros 62 Telephone: +44 (0)1932 568833 Facsimile: +44 (0)1932 568933 www.rmc-group.com Shareholder information 64 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 2001 2000 Total turnover £5,214.5m £5,055.2m 00005501111051110511105111 EBITA* £329.6m £340.3m 00005501111051110511105111 Total trading profit* £294.9m £307.9m 00005501111051110511105111 Profit before taxation* £170.7m £208.3m 00005501111051110511105111 Earnings per -
Massacre at Marikana
MASSACRE AT MARIKANA Michael Power & Manson Gwanyanya • A failure of oversight and the need • for direct community involvement ABSTRACT This paper assesses the findings of the Marikana Commission of Inquiry against Lonmin – the mining company at the centre of a wage dispute that led to the deaths of 34 protesting mineworkers in South Africa’s platinum belt – and the South African Department of Mineral Resources (DMR), particularly in relation to: (1) Lonmin’s failure to provide adequate housing to mineworkers; (2) DMR’s failure to exercise appropriate oversight over Lonmin; (3) how Lonmin and the DMR helped create an environment conducive to the massacre; and (4) how little will change without direct community involvement and oversight. KEYWORDS Marikana | South Africa | Department of Mineral Resources | South African Police Service | Lonmin • SUR 25 - v.14 n.25 • 61 - 69 | 2017 61 MASSACRE AT MARIKANA 1 • Introduction On 16 August 2012, 34 protesting mineworkers were shot and killed by members of the South African Police Service (SAPS) near a koppie1 in Marikana,2 located in South Africa’s North West Province. A further 79 mineworkers were injured and 259 were arrested. The mineworkers, employed to mine platinum at Lonmin’s Marikana operations,3 were protesting against Lonmin for a “living wage” of R12,500 per month (approx. $930). During the week preceding the shootings, 10 people were killed, including two private security guards and two police officers. The Commission of Inquiry (Marikana Commission) that was appointed by South African