DOCSLIB.ORG

The Prydniprovsky Chemical Plant – Ukraine's Uranium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Prydniprovsky Chemical Plant – Ukraine's Uranium THE PRYDNIPROVSKY CHEMICAL PLANT– UKRAINE’S URANIUM HERITAGE 2020 SURVEY REPORT ON THE ACTIVITY HISTORY AND THE MODERN STATE OF THE FORMER PRODUCTION ASSOCIATION "PRYDNIPROVSKY CHEMICAL PLANT" Authors: Yuriy Tkachenko Editor: Irina Chubko, Alexander Nikitin Translation: translation agency «WellDone» Proofreading: Charles Digges Publishers: Bellona Foundation BELLONA Vulkan 11 0178 Oslo Norway [email protected] CONTENT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DESIGNATIONS .............................................................6 FOREWORD .............................................................................................................................. 7 1. BRIEF HISTORICAL REFERENCE OF PA PCP ...............................................................9 1.1. History of activity (1949—1991) ........................................................................................9 1.2. Technologies for processing uranium raw materials and other chemical products on former PCPs ..................................................................... 12 1.2.1. Production volumes ................................................................................................... 14 2. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PC INDUSTRIAL SITE .......................................................................................15 2.1. Location and infrastructure ................................................................................................ 15 2.2. Terrain .......................................................................................................................................... 18 2.3. Geology and Soils ..................................................................................................................... 19 2.4. Seismicity .................................................................................................................................... 21 2.5. Climate ......................................................................................................................................... 21 2.6. Surface water ............................................................................................................................. 25 2.7. Groundwater.............................................................................................................................. 26 2.8. Biodiversity ................................................................................................................................ 29 2.8.1. Stone site......................................................................................................................... 29 2.8.2. Sukhachivka site .......................................................................................................... 30 2.9. Land use ....................................................................................................................................... 30 2.10. The socio-economic situation ..........................................................................................32 2.11. Demographic situation ....................................................................................................... 32 2.12. Employment of the population and the labour market ........................................ 33 2.13. GDP, income of the population ........................................................................................ 34 2.14. Industry..................................................................................................................................... 35 2.15. General environment condition ......................................................................................36 2.16. SWOT-analysis for Kamianske city ................................................................................ 39 3 3. ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AT THE PCHP SITE AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF THE USSR .........................................................................41 4. LEGAL FRAMEWORK. REVIEW OF RELEVANT STATE REGULATIONS ..............45 5. STATE PROGRAMS FOR BRINGING HAZARDOUS OBJECTS OF THE PRODUCTION ASSOCIATION "PRYDNIPROVSKY CHEMICAL PLANT" TO AN ECOLOGICALLY SAFE STATE AND THE RESULTS OF THEIR IMPLEMENTATION ..........................................................................................................51 5.1. The state program for bringing hazardous objects of the production association "Prydniprovsky Chemical Plant" to an ecologically safe state and ensuring protection of the population from the hazardous effects of ionizing radiation for 2005-2014 ................................................................................ 50 5.2. State Target Environmental Program for Safeguarding Uranium Objects of the Production Association “Prydniprovsky Chemical Plant” ......................... 53 5.3. State Targeted Environmental Program for Bringing Uranium Objects of the State Enterprise ”Barrier” for the Period 2015-2017 (Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of December 23, 2015 No. 1091) ......................................................................................................................... 56 5.4. State Targeted Environmental Program of Priority Measures for Safeguarding the Objects and Site of Former Uranium Production of the Production Association ”Prydniprovsky Chemical Plant” for 2019-2023 ........................................................................................................................... 58 5.5. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 58 6. INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS .........................................................................................60 6.1. Overview of Major Prior Projects for the Risk Assessment of Objects at the PCP Site ...................................................................................................... 60 6.1.1. ENSURE-І ........................................................................................................................ 61 6.1.2. ENSURE-II ...................................................................................................................... 61 6.1.3. IAEA Projects ................................................................................................................ 61 6.1.4. Projects funded by the European Commission ...............................................62 6.1.4.1. Development of a method (strategy, technology) for the reclamation of the territory of the former uranium object "Prydniprovsky Chemical Plant" ...........................63 6.1.4.2. "Implementation of urgent measures for Prydniprovsky Chemical Plant, Kamianske city (formerly Dniprodzerzhynsk), Ukraine" ............................................64 4 7. CURRENT SITUATION AT THE PCHP PROPERTY ....................................................71 7.1. Analysis of radioactive and chemical contamination of PChP territory ........... 71 7.1.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 71 7.1.2. Current radiation status of the industrial site .................................................71 7.1.3. Spatial analysis of the distribution of radionuclide content in the soil ........................................................................................................75 7.1.4. Spatial analysis of heavy metals distribution in soils .................................. 76 7.2. Radiation status in former industrial buildings ......................................................... 77 7.3. Tailings ......................................................................................................................................... 82 7.3.1. Zakhidne tailing ........................................................................................................... 85 7.3.2. Centralnyi Yar ............................................................................................................... 88 7.3.3. South-eastern/Pivdenno-Skhidne tailing ......................................................... 90 7.3.4. Dniprovske tailing ....................................................................................................... 92 7.3.5. Sukhachivske Tailing ................................................................................................. 95 7.3.6. Base C and BFR-6 storage sites ............................................................................101 7.3.6.1 Base C repository ........................................................................................101 7.3.6.2. BFR-6 repository ........................................................................................106 7.3.7. Assessment of the impact of the PChP site on the employees and the general public ....................................................................106 8. ROAD MAP TO PCHP SAFEGUARDING..................................................................... 112 9. AFTERWORD .................................................................................................................. 118 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 121 5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DESIGNATIONS GDP — gross domestic product HEI — higher education institution PA PCP, PCP — production association ”Prydniprovsky Chemical Plant” ESW — engineering staff worker HEPS — hydroelectric power plant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Behind the Mask of Care
    USAID Health Reform Support Project ПІДBEHIND МАСКОЮ THE MASK ТУРБОТИ OF CARE ЗВІТA REPORT ЗА BASED РЕЗУЛЬТАТАМИ ON THE RESULTS OF АНАЛІЗУ THE SITUATION СИТУАЦІЇ ANALYSIS OFВ БУДИНКАХ BABY HOMES IN ДИТИНИUKRAINE USAID Health Reform Support Project BEHIND THE MASK OF CARE A REPORT BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE SITUATION ANALYSIS OF BABY HOMES IN UKRAINE 2020 This report is made possible by the support of the American and British People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and through the UK Good Governance Fund/UK Government (UK aid). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of Deloitte Consulting, LLP and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government, UK aid, or the UK Government’s official policies. This document was prepared under Contract Number 72012118C00001. 2 A REPORT BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE SITUATION ANALYSIS OF BABY HOMES IN UKRAINE Authors 3 AUTHORS IMPLEMENTERS OF THE PILOT ASSESSMENT OF BABY HOMES AND DEVELOPMENT OF Yulia Sereda, PhD in Sociology, Public Health Expert, Pilot Consultant RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REFORM Halyna Postoliuk, Regional Director, Eastern Marie Hickmann, Child Protection Expert, Europe and Central Asia, Hope and Homes for international consultant of the USAID Health Children, International Charitable Organisation, Reform Support PhD in Education, expert on the development of social services and alternative family-based care, Vladyslava Bronova, Senior Legal Advisor Pilot Consultant of the USAID Health Reform Support Nadiia Tatarchuk,
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Public Purchasing Announcernº 24 (46) June 14, 2011
    Bulletin ISSN: 2078–5178 of the public purchasing AnnouncerNº 24 (46) June 14, 2011 Announcements of conducting procurement procedures � � � � � � � � � 2 Announcements of procurement procedures results � � � � � � � � � � � � 57 Urgently for publication � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 103 Bulletin No�24 (46) June 14, 2011 Annoucements of conducting 10443 SOE “Donetsk Railway” procurement procedures 68 Artema St., 83001 Donetsk Ukrayinska Tetyana Hryhorivna tel./fax: (062) 319–50–65; e–mail: [email protected] 10442 SOE “Donetsk Oblast Directorate on Liquidation Procurement subject: code 25.21.2 – pipes, tubes, pipelines and plastic of Unprofitable Coal–Mining Enterprises and Coal fittings (protection polyethylene tube PVC for optical fiber link laying), Refineries” (SOE “Donvuglerestrukturyzatsiya”) 233 km Uspenskogo St., 86132 Makiyivka, Donetsk Oblast, agro–industrial complex Supply/execution: Slovyansk station, Donetsk Oblast, till 31.12.2011 of mine named after A.Batov Procurement procedure: open tender Zakutayev Ihor Ivanovych Obtaining of competitive bidding documents: at the customer’s address, tel.: (06232) 9–33–02; office 2.205 tel./fax: (062) 302–81–61; Submission: at the customer’s address, office 2.205, personally or by mail e–mail: [email protected] 06.07.2011 09:30 Procurement subject: code 60.24.2 – services in freight transportation by Opening of tenders: at the customer’s address, office 2.205 non–specialized motor transport (services in transportation of other 06.07.2011 13:30 freight, code 60.24.22 – transportation of domestic fuel and other Tender security: not required freight): lot 1 – coal warehouse of mine No.9 “Kapitalna” – 8 618 t, Additional information: Qualifying criteria for participants are established in lot 2 – coal warehouse of mine “Krasnogvardiyska” – 1 036 t, lot 3 – accordance with article 16 of the Law of Ukraine on Public Procurement.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Regional Government in Ukraine and the Development of Cooperation Between Ukraine and the EU
    Local and regional government in Ukraine and the development of cooperation between Ukraine and the EU The report was written by the Aston Centre for Europe - Aston University. It does not represent the official views of the Committee of the Regions. More information on the European Union and the Committee of the Regions is available on the internet at http://www.europa.eu and http://www.cor.europa.eu respectively. Catalogue number: QG-31-12-226-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-895-0627-4 DOI: 10.2863/59575 © European Union, 2011 Partial reproduction is allowed, provided that the source is explicitly mentioned Table of Contents 1 PART ONE .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of local and regional government in Ukraine ................................ 3 1.3 Ukraine’s constitutional/legal frameworks for local and regional government 7 1.4 Competences of local and regional authorities............................................... 9 1.5 Electoral democracy at the local and regional level .....................................11 1.6 The extent and nature of fiscal decentralisation in Ukraine .........................15 1.7 The extent and nature of territorial reform ...................................................19 1.8 The politics of Ukrainian administrative reform plans.................................21 1.8.1 Position of ruling government ..................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1967 The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649. Andrew B. Pernal University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pernal, Andrew B., "The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649." (1967). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6490. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6490 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. THE ROLE OF BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKYI AND OF THE KOZAKS IN THE RUSIN STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE POLISH-LI'THUANIAN COMMONWEALTH: 1648-1649 by A ‘n d r e w B. Pernal, B. A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the University of Windsor in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Budgeting in Eastern Ukraine 2019
    PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING Practical experiences from cities and amalgamated communities in Eastern Ukraine Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Initiative for the Infrastructure Program for Ukraine Project “Strengthening Ukrainian Communities Hosting Internally Displaced Persons” PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING IN THE EAST OF Content UKRAINE – INTEGRATION FOR DEVELOPMENT The project supports the implementation of 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................7 Participatory Budgeting (PB) in 5 cities and 5 amalgamated territorial communities in Zaporizhzhia, Dnipro, and Kharkiv 2 General Description of Approach..............................................................11 oblasts. 3 Results..........................................................................................................................17 5 cities: 5 ATCs: 3.1 General results of initiative............................................................19 Kryvyi Rih Prymorska ATC 3.2 Specific results per partner.....................................................26 Kamianske Chernihivska ATC 3.2.1 Kryvyi Rih ...........................................................................................28 Melitopol Tomakivska ATC 3.2.2 Kamianske.........................................................................................30 Chuguiv Shyrokivska ATC 3.2.3 Melitopol............................................................................................32 Pervomaiskyi
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2007 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 24 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/CEP/133 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. 07.II.E.6 ISBN 978-92-1-116958-4 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword Environmental Performance Reviews (EPRs) for countries in transition were initiated by Environment Ministers at the second “Environment for Europe” Conference in Lucerne, Switzerland in 1993. As a result, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy decided to make the EPRs a part of its regular programme. Ten years later, at the fifth Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” (Kiev, 2003), the Ministers confirmed that the UNECE programme of EPRs had made it possible to assess the effectiveness of the efforts of countries with economies in transition to manage their environment. The Programme has addressed tailor-made recommendations to the Governments concerned on improving environmental management to reduce their pollution load, to better integrate environmental policies into sectoral policies and to strengthen cooperation with the international community. The Ministers also reaffirmed their support for the EPR programme as an important instrument for countries with economies in transition, and they decided that the programme should proceed with a second cycle of reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgently for Publication (Procurement Procedures) Annoucements Of
    Bulletin No�4 (183) January 28, 2014 Urgently for publication Annoucements of conducting (procurement procedures) procurement procedures 001143 000833 Luhansk National Agrarian University SOE “Prydniprovska Railway” 91008 Luhansk, Luhansk National Agrarian University 108 Karla Marksa Ave., 49600 Dnipropetrovsk Yevsiukova Liudmyla Semenivna, Bublyk Maryna Borysivna Ivanchak Serhii Volodymyrovych tel.: (095) 532–41–16; tel.: (056) 793–05–28; tel./fax: (0642) 96–77–64; tel./fax: (056) 793–00–41 e–mail: [email protected] Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: www.tender.me.gov.ua www.tender.me.gov.ua Website which contains additional information on procurement: www. tender. uz.gov.ua Website which contains additional information on procurement: www.lnau.lg.ua Procurement subject: code 33.17.1 – repair and maintenance of other Procurement subject: code 06.20.1 – natural gas, liquefied or in a gaseous vehicles and equipment (services in modernization of machine ВПР–02 state (gas exclusively for production of heat energy which is consumed with conducting major repair) – 1 unit by budget institutions and organizations), 1327,0 thousand m3 Supply/execution: on the territory of the winner of the bids; during 10 months from Supply/execution: at the customer’s address; till 31.12.2014 the moment of signing the act of delivery of track machine to modernization with Procurement procedure: procurement from the sole participant repair, but
    [Show full text]
  • Problems of Mining the Prospective Coal-Bearing Areas in Donbas
    E3S Web of Conferences 123, 01011 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /201912301011 Ukrainian School of Mining Engineering - 2019 Problems of mining the prospective coal- bearing areas in Donbas Serhii Nehrii1*, Tetiana Nehrii1, Leonid Bachurin2, and Hanna Piskurska3 1Donetsk National Technical University, Department of Mineral Deposits Development, 2 Shybankova Sq., 85300 Pokrovsk, Ukraine 2Donetsk National Technical University, Department of Production Management and Occupational Safety, 2 Shybankova Sq., 85300 Pokrovsk, Ukraine 3Donetsk National Technical University, Department of Language Training, 2 Shybankova Sq., 85300 Pokrovsk, Ukraine Abstract. The prospective coal-bearing areas of Donbas in Ukraine have been identified. Their development will increase the energy security of Ukraine. It has been suggested that the development of these areas will involve mining the coal seams in a weak roof and floor environment, which are characterized by low compressive strength, lower density and a tendency to plastic deformations. The stability has been assessed of the rocks outcrop on the contour of mine roadways for mines operating in these areas. It has been determined that roof rocks in most of these mines belong to a range of groups from very unstable to moderately stable, and the bottom rocks are, in most cases, prone to swelling. This complicates the intensive prospective areas mining with the use of advanced technologies, as well as secondary support for retained goaf-side gateroads with limited yielding property. The mines have been determined, for which this issue is relevant when mining the seams with further increase in the depth. The mechanism of displacement in the secondary supports and has been exemplified and studied using the numerical method.
    [Show full text]
  • The Landscape Structure of the Dnipro River Islands in Kyiv, Ukraine: the Venetsiansky (Hydropark) Island Case Study
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 25 May 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202105.0603.v1 Article The Landscape Structure of the Dnipro River Islands in Kyiv, Ukraine: the Venetsiansky (Hydropark) Island Case Study Pozharska Anastasiia-Olena 1* 1 Faculty of Geography, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv; Kyiv, 02017, Ukraine, [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The article studies the Venetsiansky (Hydropark) Island (the Dnipro River, Kyiv, Ukraine) landscape structure applying the genetic landscape science method and the European landscape classification (LANMAP) approach. The aim of the article is to determine the best way to study the river islands landscapes analyzing the Venetsiansky Island landscape structure by the both methods. Methodology. The genetic landscape science method consists in the next steps: 1) the island’s territory information collecting; 2) the preliminary landscape map creating; 3) field study; 4) the final landscape map creating. The LANMAP method consists on: 1) the climate study; 2) the altitude study; 3) the parent material study; 4) the land cover study. The results. The genetic land- scape science method demonstrates that the Venetsiansky Island is not a landscape, but a structural part of the landscape – the tract. The LANMAP study reveals that the Venetsiansky Island is nat- urally homogeneous, but land cover differs. The conclusion. The both methods’ study shows that the river island cannot be the entire landscape by the natural criteria, but only the part of it. The genetic landscape science explores the landscape forming while the LANMAP reveals the current state of the landscape. Keywords: the landscape structure; the river island; the Venetsiansky (Hydropark) Island; the ge- netic landscape study; the European Landscape Classification (LANMAP).
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine: Travel Advice
    Ukraine: Travel Advice WARSZAWA (WARSAW) BELARUS Advise against all travel Shostka RUSSIA See our travel advice before travelling VOLYNSKA OBLAST Kovel Sarny Chernihiv CHERNIHIVSKA OBLAST RIVNENSKA Kyivske Konotop POLAND Volodymyr- OBLAST Vodoskhovyshche Volynskyi Korosten SUMSKA Sumy Lutsk Nizhyn OBLAST Novovolynsk ZHYTOMYRSKA MISTO Rivne OBLAST KYIV Romny Chervonohrad Novohrad- Pryluky Dubno Volynskyi KYIV Okhtyrka (KIEV) Yahotyn Shepetivka Zhytomyr Lviv Kremenets Fastiv D Kharkiv ( ni D pr ni o Lubny Berdychiv ep Kupiansk er LVIVSKA OBLAST KHMELNYTSKA ) Bila OBLAST Koziatyn KYIVSKA Poltava Drohobych Ternopil Tserkva KHARKIVSKA Khmelnytskyi OBLAST POLTAVSKA Starobilsk OBLAST OBLAST Stryi Cherkasy TERNOPILSKA Vinnytsia Kremenchutske LUHANSKA OBLAST OBLAST Vodoskhovyshche Izium SLOVAKIA Kalush Smila Chortkiv Lysychansk Ivano-Frankivsk UKRAINEKremenchuk Lozova Sloviansk CHERKASKA Luhansk Uzhhorod OBLAST IVANO-FRANKIVSKA Kadiivka Kamianets- Uman Kostiantynivka OBLAST Kolomyia Podilskyi VINNYTSKA Oleksandriia Novomoskovsk Mukachevo OBLAST Pavlohrad ZAKARPATSKA OBLAST Horlivka Chernivtsi Mohyliv-Podilskyi KIROVOHRADSKA Kropyvnytskyi Dnipro Khrustalnyi OBLAST Rakhiv CHERNIVETSKA DNIPROPETROVSKA OBLAST HUNGARY OBLAST Donetsk Pervomaisk DONETSKA OBLAST Kryvyi Rih Zaporizhzhia Liubashivka Yuzhnoukrainsk MOLDOVA Nikopol Voznesensk MYKOLAIVSKA Kakhovske ZAPORIZKA ODESKA Vodoskhovyshche OBLAST OBLAST OBLAST Mariupol Berezivka Mykolaiv ROMANIA Melitopol CHIȘINĂU Nova Kakhovka Berdiansk RUSSIA Kherson KHERSONSKA International Boundary Odesa OBLAST
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2001, No.37
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE:• Verkhovna Rada finally passes election law — page 3. •A journal from SUM’s World Zlet in Ukraine — pages 10-11. • Soyuzivka’s end-of-summer ritual — centerfold. Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXIX HE No.KRAINIAN 37 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2001 EEKLY$1/$2 in Ukraine UKRAINE REACTS TO TERRORIST ATTACKS ON U.S. EU Tand UkraineU W by Roman Woronowycz President Leonid Kuchma, who had and condemned the attacks, according to Kyiv Press Bureau just concluded the Ukraine-European Interfax-Ukraine. meet in Yalta Union summit in Yalta with European “We mourn those who died in this act KYIV – Ukraine led the international Commission President Romano Prodi and response to the unprecedented terrorist of terrorism,” said Mr. Prodi. European Union Secretary of Foreign and Immediately upon his return from for third summit attacks on Washington and New York on Security Policy Javier Solana on by Roman Woronowycz September 11 when its Permanent Yalta, President Kuchma first called a Kyiv Press Bureau September 11, issued a statement express- special meeting of the National Security Mission to the United Nations called a ing shock and offering condolences. and Defense Council for the next day and KYIV – Leaders of the European special meeting of the U.N. Security Messrs. Prodi and Solana, who were at Union and Ukraine met in Yalta, Crimea, Council to coordinate global reaction. Symferopol Airport in Crimea on their then went on national television to call For security reasons, the meeting was on September 10-11 for their third annu- way back to Brussels, expressed shock (Continued on page 23) al summit – the first in Ukraine – which held outside the confines of the United had been advertised as a turning point Nations at the mission headquarters of during which relations would move from the Ukrainian delegation in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]