On the Engraved Portraits and Pretended Portraits of Milton

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the Engraved Portraits and Pretended Portraits of Milton 135 ON THE ENGRAVED PORTRAITS AND PRETENDED PORTRAITS OF MILTON. By John Fitchett Marsh, Esq. READ SBD MAY, 1860. While volumes have heen written on the portraits of Shakespeare, the information obtainable respecting those of Milton is confined to a few scattered notes of his biographers and commentators, the most copious account being one in Todd's Life, copied, with some additions, from Mr. Warton's note to Milton's Greek epigram, " In effigiei ejus sculptorem." The reason for this scarcity of information is not that less is known of the portraits of our greatest epic, than of those of our greatest dramatic poet, but that, on the contrary, more being known, less has been left to con­ jecture ; but, unfortunately, the existing materials have been so used by successive commentators each adopting and adding to the mistakes of his predecessors as to produce an amount of confusion from which it is my hope to assist in extricating the subject. The objects I propose to myself in the present paper are, to examine the relation in which the usually received portraits stand to each other, to collect the scattered notices of them, and thus to render them available for the illustration of a connected series of representations of the poet's features. It is of ENGRAVED PORTRAITS only that I propose to treat, having no opportunities for making myself acquainted with the original pictures and drawings. The extent of the materials for a catalogue is greater than perhaps would be generally supposed : for while Granger's list comprises 37 portraits, Bromley's only 25, and Evans's 42, I have been enabled not only to compile a catalogue of 161, but to produce upwards of 150 for your inspection. The portrait painted at the age of ten, now in the possession of Mr. Disney; that at the age of twenty-one, purchased from the executor of Milton's widow by Speaker Onslow; the print engraved by Marshal, for the first edition of the minor poems, in 1645 ; and that prefixed to the 136 'first edition of the History of Britain, inscribed " Gul. Faithorne ad vivum " delin. et sculpsit, 1670," at the age of 62, form a series of unquestionable authenticity, taken at various periods of the Poet's life, and presenting such marked difference of feature as to create no risk of mistake or con­ fusion among them. Their peculiarities and history will be more fitly noticed when we come to describe them in detail; but the name of Faithorne has been so unwarrantably mixed up with the mistakes and falsifications which I shall presently have to expose, that it will be con­ venient, before proceeding further, to describe the characteristics by which his celebrated engraving, and the large number of portraits derived from it, may be distinguished. If, in doing this, I say little about expression and features, it is because they are more easily conveyed to the mind by actual inspection than described by words, and because the caprice or incompetence of engravers may readily produce such a variation in them as effectually to disguise the source from which their subject has been derived; whereas peculiarities of dress and attitude, though in some respects secondary considerations, are usually found so persistently pre­ served as to furnish satisfactory evidence of a common origin. The Faithorne engraving, then, may be distinguished by the following charac­ teristics : The face is turned in the same direction as the bust. There is a broad Genevan band, * the nearer hulf of which lies quite straight, and the other half falls in several folds, beneath which is seen a tassel. * As we shall have to mention the distinguishing costumes of the various portraits, it will be well to explain the sense in which several terms are used, especially as the name of the modern academic badge connects the idea of " bunds", in popular estima­ tion, ruther with the Genevan band here referred to than with the article of dress to which the term " band" was originally applied. The circular ruff, with its ample plaits, is familiar to us in the portraits of Queen Elizabeth's courtiers. In the succeeding reign (see J'lanche on Bnt'tsh Cosf.ume, ed. 1847, p. 350), " the ruff was occasionally " exchanged for a wide stiff collar, standing out horizontally and squarely, made of the " same stuff, and starched and wired as usual, but plain instead of plaited or pinched, "and sometimes edged, like the ruff, with laco: these collars were called 'Bands'" from which conies the term " band-box" and Fairholt in the Glossary to his History of Costume defines the BAND as " a collar of linen or cambric, surrounding the neck, " and which was stiffened with starch, or underpropped; or else allowed to fall npon the " shoulders, when it was termed a 'falling-bund'." The Janssen portrait and that de­ scribed in tlie Gent. Mag. so closely resembling it (No. 4) furnish excellent illustrations of the " baud" and "falling-band" respectively: it is an error to confound either one or the other with the " ruff." Deprived of their laced edges the sides cut away that they might not fall over the shoulder and the parts overhanging the chest cut square the transition is easy from the " falling-bands" to the " Geneva bands," which, Mr. Planche observes, are " like those worn by our modern clergymen and councillors, " except that instead of being two small pieces worn for distinction merely, they were " bona fide collars, the ends of which hung negligently out over the waistcoat." (p. 390.) For a fair specimen of the transition here spoken of see the print numbered 151. III. H. S. o» L. & C. Vot. XII. No. 1. No. -t. Janssen's Portrait. Prom an Engraving by Portrait from " Gentleman's Magazine," Cipriani. vol. tvn. No. 5. No. 21. The Onalow Portrait. From an Engraving Marshal's Engraving, 1B46. by Vertue. 1H7 The drapery, which falls so as to cover the vest except the two upper buttons, is drawn rather tight over the nearer shoulder. A thick fold, a little below, takes a direction more nearly approaching the horizontal; and below that, the edge or a thin fold of the material takes a peculiar curve from one side of the figure to the other. Leaving these distinctive marks to be borne in mind when we come to compare the portraits with which this original has been confounded, I will proceed! to notice the circumstances from which the confusion I refer to has arisen. Several applications seem to have been made to Deborah Clarke, Milton's youngest daughter, who survived him until the year 1727, for her opinion on the authenticity of supposed portraits of her father. The first is related in a letter from Vertue to Mr. Christian, the seal engraver, preserved in the British Museum,* and is as follows: " Mr. Christian Pray inform my Lord Harleyt that I have on Thursday " last seen the Daughter of Milton the Poet. I carry'd with me two or " three different Prints of Milton's picture which she immediately knew to " be like her father & told me her mother in Law (if | living in Cheshire) " had two pictures of him, one when he was a school boy & the other when " about § twenty. She knows of no other picture of him because she was " several years in Ireland both before & after his Death. She was the " youngest of Milton's daughters by his first wife and was taught to read " to her father several Languages. Mr. Addison was desirous to see her " once & desired she would bring with her Testimonials of her being " Milton's daughter. But as soon as she came into the Room he told her " she needed none, her face haveing much of the likeness of the pictures " he had seen of him. For my part I find the features of her Face very « This letter lias been printed in the Gent. Mag. (1831); in the Memoirs of Thomas Hollis ; and in Ivimey's and Masson's Biographies, and perhaps elsewhere. In some of these the reference is to Hart. MSS. 7003, /. 17B, and in others to Add. MSS. 5lll6«, f. 71. The fact is that the former is the original letter, and the latter a transcript of it in the handwriting of Dr. Birch, which, though nearly accurate, has, from its not being quite so legible as the original, led to inaccuracies in subsequent copies. Having stumbled on this fact at the Museum, I took the trouble of collating the two manu­ scripts ; and the letter in the text is a literatim copy of the original. t Lord Henley. (Ivimey's Life of Milton, p. 320.) { The "if" is omitted in Birch's copy. Vertue had originally written "is," but altered it with the pen. The doubt expressed, though immaterial to our present purpose, is confirmatory of observations I have made elsewhere on the indifference with which Milton's widow was spoken of by his family, § " Above" in Birch's copy. 138 "much like the Prints. I showd her the Painting I have to engrave " which she believes not to be her Father's picture, it being of a Brown " complexion & black hair & curled locks on the contrary he was of a " fair complexion a little red in his cheeks & light brown lanck hair. I " desire you woud acquaint Mr. Prior I was so unfortunate to wait on him " on Thursday morning last just after he was gone out of Town it was " with * this intent, to enquire of him if he remembers a picture of Milton " in the late Lord Dorsett's collection as I am told this f was or if he " can inform me how I shall enquire or know the truth of this affair.
Recommended publications
  • William Faithorne II (1656–1701)
    Neil Jeffares, Dictionary of pastellists before 1800 Online edition FAITHORNE, William influential treatise, The art of graveing and etching, sévère, mais a les traits assez beau, et ce qu’on London 1616–13.V.1691 derived from Abraham Bosse’s 1645 Traicté des voit en lui de sévère n’empêche pas de lui Engraver and draughtsman. His date of birth is manières de graver en taille douce. He was involved trouver des traits de génie et des yeux pleins disputed: Buckeridge gives his age at death as closely with the devlopment of scientific de feu”); Samuel Lewis, Topographical dictionary “near 75”, from which 1616 is inferred; the illustrations, including for the Royal Society, of of England, 1831, I, p. 356 n.r.; Norgate 1997, Oxford DNB suggests a later date, c.1620, from nine fellows of which Faithorne made portraits. p. 195, all as by Cooper ϕα his probable age when he was apprenticed to On 9.V.1654 at St Michael’s, Cornhill the printseller William Peake (son of James I’s Faithorne married Judith Grant or Graunt painter Robert Peake) in 1635. Neither Peake (1630–1690), daughter of Henry Grant, draper, nor his son Robert (who took over the business and Mary; her brother, also baptised at St in 1639) were engravers, and Faithorne may Michael’s Cornhill, was the celebrated have learned the skill from John Payne. statistician Captain John Graunt (1620–1674), a Faithorne joined the civil war on the royalist friend of Sir William Petty who figures in side with Peake. Captured during the siege of Aubrey’s Brief lives and Pepys’s Diary; he was also Basing House (1645), he was imprisoned at a fellow of the Royal Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Magazine of HISTORY and BIOGRAPHY
    THE Pennsylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY A Pennsylvania Farmer at the Court of King George John Dickinson's London Letters, 1754-1756 HE modern American political scene has long been dominated by lawyers. The legal profession has contributed many more Tthan its share of presidents, senators, and congressmen; occasionally, a good lawyer even finds a berth on the Supreme Court. But the lawyer's proclivity for politics is far from new. With a few notable exceptions (such as Samuel Adams and Benjamin Franklin), the American revolutionary leadership of the 1760's and I77o's was predominantly legal in its professional affiliation. Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, John Adams, James Otis, Daniel Dulany, Jr., William Henry Dray ton, and James Wilson, to offer a selection, were all practicing lawyers at one time or another. They found that their legal education served them extraordinarily well in resolving the proper relationship of their respective provinces to the mother country. Their legal training unquestionably colored their political thinking. As David Ramsay explained in 1789, "no order of men has, in all ages, been more favorable to liberty, than lawyers." When entering the political arena, Ramsay continued, lawyers operated 241 1<\1 H. TREVOR COLBOURN July with a special skill and technique: "while others judge of bad princi- ples by the actual grievances they occasion, lawyers discover them at a distance, and trace future mischiefs from gilded innovations."1 Surprisingly little attention has been given to the lawyer's role in the American Revolution, or to American legal history generally, despite the accuracy of Edmund Burke's remark that "in no country perhaps in the world is the law so general a study/'2 One explanation for this historical delinquency might well be the complexity of the lawyer's craft.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers of the House of Commons
    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
    [Show full text]
  • Lives of Eminent Serjeants
    00024288 i ' 1 I the I I A siatic Society of Bombay | Towf-n MaM, Bombay, ® Digitized with financial assistance from the Government of Maharashtra on 19 September, 2016 LIVES OF EMINENT SERJEANTS-AT-LAW / r ' ‘ A t, ■*< (■; 1' ■ ■ > 1 \\ \ ' '-'’1'- l ;r L -*y ’i« v_ *■ ' y LIVES EMINENT 8ERJEANT8-AT-LAW OP THE ENGLISH BAB. BY HUMPHRY WILLIAM WOOLRYCH. Serjeant-at-Lavt. 24288 — IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. II. ■ ■■] LONDON: W m . h . ALLEN & CO., 13, WATERLOO PLACE, PALL MALL. S.W. 1869. t’j'-o // ,v 00024288 00024288 L0KD0N!_L swx8 & s, Alo(orgate Street. LIVES OF EMINENT SERJEANTS. THE DARNALS. W hether Darnal, Darnel, or DameU, or even Darnall, according to various readings, these lawyers were of high promise. The elder was spoken of in 1700, amongst other gossip, by Luttrell, as the new Baron of the Exchequer, and actually, though incorrectly, named by him as such.* A classical pim is extant upon the name. Kett, or Horse Kett, as he was called at Oxford, from the resemblance which his head bore to that animal, was a master of the schools at Oxfoi’d, and with him was Mr. Dai’nell. The following line was immediately applied to these gentlemen:— “ Infclix Lolium, et steriles dominantur avenffi.” “ Oats and Davnol choke the rising corn.”’ Or rather, according to Covington, nascimtur. “ Nas- 1 “ Diary,’* voL iv. pp. 652, 653. Sir Salathiol Lovol, Recorclor of London, got the vacant place, '' Dryden*3 “ Pastorals," vol. v. p. 56.—“ Virg. Eclog.,*’ v. 37- yoL . II. 1 Limes OF EMPBNT SBHJEAKTS. «uiii'tur,” he observes, is fouaad:^ ¿¡H th e M SS.” A nd ’ he dhsthigudshes the ^vord “dornikiantur'' iaa th e “ dreorgÌGS,.” -where exactly the sa®ae passage appears, ■ b y i^eferriag th e ikist to“ Weeds giiow higdmongst th e Gora,” whereas, here the “ weeds are ^?owipgvmtmà of baadey.” * tS© ia Job: Goekle or darabl iastead o i barley.
    [Show full text]
  • Grosvenor Prints 19 Shelton Street Covent Garden London WC2H 9JN
    Grosvenor Prints 19 Shelton Street Covent Garden London WC2H 9JN Tel: 020 7836 1979 Fax: 020 7379 6695 E-mail: [email protected] www.grosvenorprints.com Dealers in Antique Prints & Books Prints from the Collection of the Hon. Christopher Lennox-Boyd Arts 3801 [Little Fatima.] [Painted by Frederick, Lord Leighton.] Gerald 2566 Robinson Crusoe Reading the Bible to Robinson. London Published December 15th 1898 by his Man Friday. "During the long timer Arthur Lucas the Proprietor, 31 New Bond Street, W. Mezzotint, proof signed by the engraver, ltd to 275. that Friday had now been with me, and 310 x 490mm. £420 that he began to speak to me, and 'Little Fatima' has an added interest because of its understand me. I was not wanting to lay a Orientalism. Leighton first showed an Oriental subject, foundation of religious knowledge in his a `Reminiscence of Algiers' at the Society of British mind _ He listened with great attention." Artists in 1858. Ten years later, in 1868, he made a Painted by Alexr. Fraser. Engraved by Charles G. journey to Egypt and in the autumn of 1873 he worked Lewis. London, Published Octr. 15, 1836 by Henry in Damascus where he made many studies and where Graves & Co., Printsellers to the King, 6 Pall Mall. he probably gained the inspiration for the present work. vignette of a shipwreck in margin below image. Gerald Philip Robinson (printmaker; 1858 - Mixed-method, mezzotint with remarques showing the 1942)Mostly declared pirnts PSA. wreck of his ship. 640 x 515mm. Tears in bottom Printsellers:Vol.II: margins affecting the plate mark.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pilgrimage Through English History and Culture (F-L)
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Faculty Publications 2009-05-01 A Pilgrimage Through English History and Culture (F-L) Gary P. Gillum [email protected] Susan Wheelwright O'Connor Alexa Hysi Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub Part of the English Language and Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Gillum, Gary P.; O'Connor, Susan Wheelwright; and Hysi, Alexa, "A Pilgrimage Through English History and Culture (F-L)" (2009). Faculty Publications. 12. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/12 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 833 FAIRFAX, JOHN, 1623-1700. Rare 922.542 St62f 1681 Presbýteros diples times axios, or, The true dignity of St. Paul's elder, exemplified in the life of that reverend, holy, zealous, and faithful servant, and minister of Jesus Christ Mr. Owne Stockton ... : with a collection of his observations, experiences and evidences recorded by his own hand : to which is added his funeral sermon / by John Fairfax. London : Printed by H.H. for Tho. Parkhurst at the Sign of the Bible and Three Crowns, at the lower end of Cheapside, 1681. Description: [12], 196, [20] p. ; 15 cm. References: Wing F 129. Subjects: Stockton, Owen, 1630-1680. Notes: Title enclosed within double line rule border. "Mors Triumphata; or The Saints Victory over Death; Opened in a Funeral Sermon ... " has special title page. 834 FAIRFAX, THOMAS FAIRFAX, Baron, 1612-1671.
    [Show full text]
  • London Artisans and Its Old Artisans – Millwrights 1775-18251 Part 1
    London Artisans and its old artisans – millwrights 1775-18251 Dr. J.G. Moher - January 2016 Part 1 Abstract Set in the late eighteenth/early nineteenth century metropolis and its environs, this is a study of a small but pivotal group of handicraftsmen, the London master and journeymen millwrights. These mechanical handicraftsmen, harnessed the power sources of those times, mill-wheels and engines driven by water, wind, animal and ’fire’. The nature of the craft is examined in its specific setting of the London region’s services, manufactures and industries of the 1770s onwards, using new original sources derived from research into the changing technology of the trade. Although a tiny group, these handicraftsmen attracted one of the first attempts by Parliament to suppress a trade ‘combination’ by law in 1799, signifying a deeper importance than has previously been appreciated. This study reveals the enormous impact of the millwrights’ trade club activities on the London region’s early brewing, distilling and other manufacturing industries. Part 1 examines the technology of the late eighteenth century millwrighting craft. It then traces the course of the industrial and political struggle between the masters and journeymen which culminated in the masters’ and their ‘employers’ campaign for a Bill to suppress the Journeymen’s Society in 1799. 1 Part 2 takes the story on to the early decades of the nineteenth century, disclosing the continuing industrial battles and Parliamentary struggles for supremacy in the emerging London engineering industry, culminating in the repeal of the journeymen’s key apprenticeship guild laws. The outcome, was the replacement of the medieval master and journeymen system, with its shared control of key features of the trade, by modern employer/employee relationships based an engineers’ economy of individualized terms and conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SPEAKER of the HOUSE of COMMONS Rev January 1993
    HOUSE OF COMMONS PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE FACTSHEET No 21 THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS rev January 1993 It is hard to imagine what the House of Commons would be like if the Speakership had not evolved in something like its present form, so central to the House's whole way of life is the direction and guidance it receives from its chairman. Most readers of this Factsheet will be aware from watching or listening to broadcasts of the House or from attending debates of something of the duties of the Speaker. It is the purpose of these notes to summarise the principal aspects of the Speakership. AN ILLUSTRATION APPEARS HERE IN HARD COPY Madam Speaker, Rt Hon Betty Boothroyd MP dressed in state robes DUTIES OF THE SPEAKER The Speaker acts as Chairman during debates, and sees that the rules laid down by the House for the carrying on of its business are observed. In recent years Speakers have tended to have three spells in the Chair: 2.30 to 4.30 pm, 6.30 to 7.30 pm, and a period near the end of the day. For the rest of the time, one of the deputies will preside. It is the Speaker who selects (or calls) Members to speak. He or she acts as the House's representative in its corporate relations with outside bodies and the other elements of Parliament, the House of Lords and the Crown. It is also the Speaker who reprimands on behalf of the House an offender brought to the Bar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speaker of the House of Commons: the Office and Its Holders Since 1945
    The Speaker of the House of Commons: The Office and Its Holders since 1945 Matthew William Laban Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 1 STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY I, Matthew William Laban, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of this thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Date: Details of collaboration and publications: Laban, Matthew, Mr Speaker: The Office and the Individuals since 1945, (London, 2013). 2 ABSTRACT The post-war period has witnessed the Speakership of the House of Commons evolving from an important internal parliamentary office into one of the most recognised public roles in British political life. This historic office has not, however, been examined in any detail since Philip Laundy’s seminal work entitled The Office of Speaker published in 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • British Art Studies June 2020 British Art Studies Issue 16, Published 30 June 2020
    British Art Studies June 2020 British Art Studies Issue 16, published 30 June 2020 Cover image: Bill Brandt, Family Supper (recto), 1937, printed ca. 1943, photographic print.. Digital image courtesy of Bill Brandt and the Bill Brandt Archive Ltd. Photography by Richard Caspole and Robert Hixon. PDF generated on 21 July 2021 Note: British Art Studies is a digital publication and intended to be experienced online and referenced digitally. PDFs are provided for ease of reading offline. Please do not reference the PDF in academic citations: we recommend the use of DOIs (digital object identifiers) provided within the online article. Theseunique alphanumeric strings identify content and provide a persistent link to a location on the internet. A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it to link permanently to electronic documents with confidence. Published by: Paul Mellon Centre 16 Bedford Square London, WC1B 3JA https://www.paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk In partnership with: Yale Center for British Art 1080 Chapel Street New Haven, Connecticut https://britishart.yale.edu ISSN: 2058-5462 DOI: 10.17658/issn.2058-5462 URL: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk Editorial team: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/editorial-team Advisory board: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/advisory-board Produced in the United Kingdom. A joint publication by Contents “The Bold Adventure of All”: Reconstructing the Place of Portraits in Interregnum England, Helen Pierce “The Bold Adventure of All”: Reconstructing the Place of Portraits in Interregnum England Helen Pierce Abstract In terms of art production and patronage, a long-held line of thought established at the Restoration cast the 1650s as the dull decade of seventeenth-century England, with a glittering Caroline court replaced by the austere rule of Oliver Cromwell and his Puritan-dominated government.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Milton's Library
    John Milton and the Cultures of Print An Exhibition of Books, Manuscripts, and Other Artifacts February 3, 2011 – May 31, 2011 Rutgers University Libraries Special Collections and University Archives Alexander Library Rutgers University Thomas Fulton Published by Rutgers University Libraries Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick, NJ John Milton at the age of 62, in The hisTory of BriTain (1670), by the english engraver WilliaM faithorne, taken froM life. Cover illustration: illustration by WilliaM blake froM Blake, MilTon a poeM (1804) Table of Contents Introduction . 1 I Milton’s Library . 3 II Milton’s Early Poetry . 7 III The Scribal Publication of Verse . 10 IV Pamphlet Wars . 12 V Divorce Tracts . 14 VI Revolution and the Freedom of the Press . 16 VII The Execution of Charles I . 19 VIII Milton and Sons: A Family Business . 22 IX The Restoration: Censorship and Paradise Lost . 23 X The Christian Doctrine . 26 XI Censorship and Milton’s Late Work . 27 XII J . Milton French: A Tribute . 29 Acknowledgements . 30 This exhibition was made possible by a grant from the New Jersey Council for the Humanities, a state partner of the National Endowment for the Humanities . Any views, findings, conclusions or recommendations in the exhibition do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities or the New Jersey Council for the Humanities . ntroduction John Milton was born in 1608 to a century of revolution — in politics, in print media, in science and the arts . By the time he died in 1674, Britain had experienced the governments of three different Stuart monarchs, the protectorate of Oliver Cromwell, and a few short-lived experiments in republican government .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Early Royal Society and Visual Culture Sachiko Kusukawa1 Trinity
    The Early Royal Society and Visual Culture Sachiko Kusukawa1 Trinity College, Cambridge [Abstract] Recent studies have fruitfully examined the intersection between early modern science and visual culture by elucidating the functions of images in shaping and disseminating scientific knowledge. Given its rich archival sources, it is possible to extend this line of research in the case of the Royal Society to an examination of attitudes towards images as artefacts –manufactured objects worth commissioning, collecting and studying. Drawing on existing scholarship and material from the Royal Society Archives, I discuss Fellows’ interests in prints, drawings, varnishes, colorants, images made out of unusual materials, and methods of identifying the painter from a painting. Knowledge of production processes of images was important to members of the Royal Society, not only as connoisseurs and collectors, but also as those interested in a Baconian mastery of material processes, including a “history of trades”. Their antiquarian interests led to discussion of painters’ styles, and they gradually developed a visual memorial to an institution through portraits and other visual records. Introduction In the Royal Society Library there is a manuscript (MS/136) entitled “Miniatura or the Art of Lymning” 2 by Edward Norgate (1581-1650), who was keeper of the King’s musical instruments, Windsor Herald, and an art agent for “the collector Earl”, Thomas Howard, Earl of Arundel (1586-1646) (Norgate 1997, pp. 1-9). Two versions exist of Norgate’s “Miniatura”, the first of which was 1 written for his friend, Sir Theodore Turquet de Mayerne (1573-1655), and a second, expanded treatise was dedicated to his patron’s son, Henry Frederick Howard, the third Earl of Arundel (1608-1652), also an art connoisseur.
    [Show full text]