DOCSLIB.ORG

DEVELOPMENT and PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION of a CLINICAL BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE for LICENSED PSYCHOLOGISTS Joseph F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DEVELOPMENT and PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION of a CLINICAL BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE for LICENSED PSYCHOLOGISTS Joseph F University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Dissertations 2015 DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF A CLINICAL BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR LICENSED PSYCHOLOGISTS Joseph F. Meyer III University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss Terms of Use All rights reserved under copyright. Recommended Citation Meyer, Joseph F. III, "DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF A CLINICAL BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR LICENSED PSYCHOLOGISTS" (2015). Open Access Dissertations. Paper 339. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/339 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF A CLINICAL BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR LICENSED PSYCHOLOGISTS BY JOSEPH F. MEYER III A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2015 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DISSERTATION OF JOSEPH F. MEYER III APPROVED: Dissertation Committee: Major Professor: David Faust, Ph.D. Robert Laforge, Sc.D. William Krieger, Ph.D. Nasser H. Zawia, Ph.D. DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2015 ABSTRACT In recent decades, a specific class of dubious clinical practices has been labeled pseudoscientific and highlighted as a growing area of concern in psychology. Experts have identified numerous examples of pseudoscientific treatments, which are troubling for various ethical reasons. In light of the absence of research investigating the nature of professional beliefs and knowledge associated with scientifically substantiated and unsubstantiated clinical interventions, the primary objective of this study was to develop a questionnaire (viz., the Clinical Attitudes and Knowledge Questionnaire, or CAKQ) to appraise specific clinical knowledge domains and attitudes toward science among licensed, doctoral-level practitioners of clinical psychology. This aim was pursued through generating items designed to detect the presence of knowledge pertaining to (a) legitimate and questionable treatment techniques used in contemporary clinical practice; (b) general clinical psychology research (e.g., controversies relevant to applied practice); and (c) clinical judgment and decision- making procedures. A preliminary scale consisting of items addressing practitioner attitudes toward science in clinical psychology was also created. A secondary study aim was to ascertain whether psychologists’ professed knowledge varied in relation to years involved in clinical practice. Two thousand randomly selected licensed psychologists in New England engaged in clinical practice were invited to participate in the study, and the final sample size was 324 participants. Statistical analyses indicated that the initial hypotheses were partially supported. The hypothesis that a four-component solution would best summarize the CAKQ data was not supported by principal components analysis results. However, the hypothesized relationship between clinical knowledge and critical thinking skills was partially supported. Consistent with expectations, a lower reliance on intuitive thinking styles was associated with greater clinical knowledge. Finally, the hypothesis that total number of years of clinical experience would not predict higher clinical knowledge scores was also upheld. Study limitations and future research directions were discussed. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to express his sincere gratitude to his major professor, David Faust, for his intellectual nurturance and guidance, invaluable corrective feedback, good-humored tolerance of his professional growing pains, and kind moral support during the vicissitudes of graduate school and fatherhood. Special thanks is also due to members of the author’s dissertation committee for their much-appreciated guidance, and to Bob Laforge and Will Krieger for their enthusiastic support of the author’s evolving program of scholarly work over the last several years. The author also conveys his heartfelt appreciation for the warm encouragement and forbearance of his family and close friends throughout the many late evenings of dissertation writing. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………….... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………………………………………….. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………... v LIST OF TABLES …………………………………………………………………. vi LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………………………………….. vii CHAPTER 1 ………………………………………………………………………… 1 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………… 1 CHAPTER 2 ………………………………………………………………………… 7 REVIEW OF LITERATURE ………………………………………………... 7 CHAPTER 3 ……………………………………………………………………….. 68 METHODOLOGY ………………………………………………………….. 68 CHAPTER 4 ……………………………………………………………………….. 79 RESULTS ………………………………………………………………….. 79 CHAPTER 5 ……………………………………………………………………….. 86 DISCUSSION ………………………………………………………………. 86 FOOTNOTES …………………………………………………………………….. 100 APPENDIX ………………………………………………………………………. 125 CLINICIAN SURVEY …………………………………………………… 125 BIBLIOGRAPHY ………………………………………………………………. 133 v LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE Table 1. Demographic and Professional Characteristics of Participants ( N=324)…108 Table 2. Clinical Attitudes and Knowledge Questionnaire Item Responses ………111 Table 3. Scale Means, Standard Deviations, and Intercorrelations ………………..120 Table 4. Means, Standard Deviations, Rotated Factor Loadings, and Communalities for the Rational-Experiential Inventory Items …………………………………….. 121 Table 5. Multiple Regression Analysis Summary for Rational-Experiential Inventory Total Scores and Critical Thinking Questionnaire Subscale Scores Predicting Clinical Attitudes and Knowledge Questionnaire Total Scores ……………………………..122 vi LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE Figure 1. Pareto Bar Graph of “Not Familiar” Responses to Clinical Attitudes and Knowledge Questionnaire Items ……………………………………………………123 vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Economist Alan Blinder (1987) eloquently argued that although having one’s heart in the right place, or “softheartedness,” was essential to guiding humane approaches to economic policies, a reticence to steer the development and implementation of such policies with well-informed critical thinking, or “hardheadedness,” may result in undesirable or even disastrous consequences. Likewise, in clinical psychology, effective practitioners should be capable of not only exhibiting warmth and empathy during therapeutic interactions with clients, but also be willing to keep strictly intuitive and emotionally-driven preferences at bay while scrutinizing the evidentiary value of assessments and treatments to be considered and implemented. Unfortunately, “hardheaded” critical thinking appears to be underutilized (and possibly underappreciated) among a considerable percentage of practitioners within the field (see Gaudiano, Brown, & Miller, 2011; 2012; Sharp, Herbert, & Redding, 2008), which is concerning given the potentially baneful ramifications for vulnerable mental health clients. A possible consequence of tenuous critical thinking habits combined with insufficient familiarity with peer-reviewed research (although additional factors are likely involved) is the proliferation of suboptimal clinical approaches (Beyerstein, 2001; Lilienfeld, Ruscio, & Lynn, 2008; Lohr, Fowler, & Lilienfeld, 2002, summer). A specific class of questionable clinical practices has been labeled pseudoscientific in 1 recent decades and highlighted as a special area of focus and concern in psychology (Lilienfeld et al., 2003; Pignotti & Thyer, 2009; Still & Dryden, 2004). Despite difficulties formally defining pseudoscience, which is largely attributable to the complexities of the enduring demarcation problem in philosophy of science (Derksen, 1993; Lakatos, 1974; Laudan, 1983; Pigliucci & Boudry, 2013; Resnik, 2000), there is some consensus on specific hallmarks or warning signs distinguishing pseudoscience from science. These include: (a) a disproportionate focus on hypothesis confirmation at the expense of adequate testing and refutation; (b) attempts to shield the fundamental principles (or hard core ) of a research program from falsification through an ongoing invocation of auxiliary hypotheses, which Lakatos (1970) termed a degenerative research program when taken to extremes; (c) evasion of the peer review process; (d) the use of obscurantist jargon to create a superficial veneer of scientific legitimacy; (e) a consistent lack of self-correction and subsequent stagnation of ideas; (f) shifting the burden of proof from claimants to skeptics (e.g., declaring that the onus lies squarely on the critics of an approach to adduce evidence against it); (g) an absence of specified conditions under which claims do not hold (i.e., the delineation of boundary conditions); (h) lack of connectivity with related areas of scientific knowledge; and (i) an overemphasis on personal anecdotes and testimonials to lend credence to claims (Bunge, 1984; Lilienfeld, 2005, September; Lilienfeld et al., 2003; see also Ruscio, 2005). Thus, pseudoscience can be conceptualized as “nonscience masquerading as genuine science” (Lilienfeld, 2010, p. 286) and often contains expansive or extraordinary claims that lack essential supportive evidence, contradict well-established scientific findings, and/or overstep the boundaries of 2 current scientific knowledge. Experts have identified numerous
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Psychotherapy Can Be a Sham, Unless
    Psychotherapy can be a sham, unless ............. Courtenay Young ___________________________________________ Abstract: An in-depth look at the definition and essence of psychotherapy in an attempt to clarify exactly what psychotherapy is and how best psychotherapists can react to outside pressures and criticisms. ________________________________________________ Psychotherapy is under attack! And we, as psychotherapists, are not responding appropriately. In one country (France) there was such hysteria as to whether psychotherapy is being used in order to promote sects or cults that they passed a new law in order to try to prevent this. There have now been intensive, and we hope successful, negotiations with the French ministries to exclude properly organised psychotherapy from such legal constraints. There was a similar impulse several years ago that promopted a private member’s Bill on psychotherapy in the UK Parliament to try to stop the growth of the Scientology movement, as it was feared that they were calling what they did “psychotherapy”, and thus psychotherapy had to be regulated to prevent this. In another country (Spain), anyone who inadventently calls themselves a psychologist or correctly calls themself a psychotherapist is seen as some sort of untrained sham or con-artist and such a danger to the public that they can be (and have been) arrested. This type of paranoia, partially generated by other professionals trying to hold onto or increase their slice of the psychotherapy cake, is so great that the practice of psychotherapy is trying to be limited to something that can only be undertaken by (so called) professionals in other disciplines - doctors and psychologists - to ensure that it is being done properly.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Occult and Fantastic Beliefs Vol.4: S - Z
    Bruno Antonio Buike, editor / undercover-collective „Paul Smith“, alias University of Melbourne, Australia Bibliography of Occult and Fantastic Beliefs vol.4: S - Z © Neuss / Germany: Bruno Buike 2017 Buike Music and Science [email protected] BBWV E30 Bruno Antonio Buike, editor / undercover-collective „Paul Smith“, alias University of Melbourne, Australia Bibliography of Occult and Fantastic Beliefs - vol.4: S - Z Neuss: Bruno Buike 2017 CONTENT Vol. 1 A-D 273 p. Vol. 2 E-K 271 p. Vol. 3 L-R 263 p. Vol. 4 S-Z 239 p. Appr. 21.000 title entries - total 1046 p. ---xxx--- 1. Dies ist ein wissenschaftliches Projekt ohne kommerzielle Interessen. 2. Wer finanzielle Forderungen gegen dieses Projekt erhebt, dessen Beitrag und Name werden in der nächsten Auflage gelöscht. 3. Das Projekt wurde gefördert von der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Sozialamt Neuss. 4. Rechtschreibfehler zu unterlassen, konnte ich meinem Computer trotz jahrelanger Versuche nicht beibringen. Im Gegenteil: Das Biest fügt immer wieder neue Fehler ein, wo vorher keine waren! 1. This is a scientific project without commercial interests, that is not in bookstores, but free in Internet. 2. Financial and legal claims against this project, will result in the contribution and the name of contributor in the next edition canceled. 3. This project has been sponsored by the Federal Republic of Germany, Department for Social Benefits, city of Neuss. 4. Correct spelling and orthography is subject of a constant fight between me and my computer – AND THE SOFTWARE in use – and normally the other side is the winning party! Editor`s note – Vorwort des Herausgebers preface 1 ENGLISH SHORT PREFACE „Paul Smith“ is a FAKE-IDENTY behind which very probably is a COLLCETIVE of writers and researchers, using a more RATIONAL and SOBER approach towards the complex of Rennes-le-Chateau and to related complex of „Priory of Sion“ (Prieure de Sion of Pierre Plantard, Geradrd de Sede, Phlippe de Cherisey, Jean-Luc Chaumeil and others).
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Psychotherapies: Conceptual Elucidation and Epidemiological Framework
    Title: Alternative psychotherapies: conceptual elucidation and epidemiological framework Angelo Fasce1 & Jesús Adrián-Ventura2 1 Department of Philosophy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain. 2 Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Jaume I University, 12071 Castellón, Spain. Running title: Alternative psychotherapies Corresponding author: Angelo Fasce ([email protected]) Department of Philosophy, University of Valencia, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 30, 46010 Valencia, Spain 2 Alternative psychotherapies: conceptual elucidation and epidemiological framework Abstract: This article elucidates and defines alternative psychotherapies, as well as describing the variables that explain why some professional psychologists are prone to endorse these practices. First, the novel concept of "Complementary and Alternative Psychotherapies" (CAP) is defined within the framework of the established hierarchy of clinical evidence. Second, we report a literature review to aid understanding of the main variables explaining why some clinicians prefer CAP. We review rejection of scientific reasoning, misconceptions about human nature, and pragmatic limitations of evidence-based practice. Keywords: evidence-based psychology, alternative psychotherapies, alternative medicine, CAP, pseudoscience. Public Significance Statement: This article coins the concept of Complementary and Alternative Psychotherapies (CAP): all techniques presented as psychotherapies without adequate evidence for effective treatment. Moreover, we disclose
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm Scott O
    PERSPECTIVESONPSYCHOLOGICALSCIENCE Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University ABSTRACT—The phrase primum non nocere (‘‘first, do no 2.5 pages (out of a total of 821 pages of text) on the topic of harm’’) is a well-accepted credo of the medical and mental adverse effects in therapy. The recent APA position paper on health professions. Although emerging data indicate that evidence-based practice (APA Presidential Task Force on Evi- several psychological treatments may produce harm in dence-based Practice, 2006) does not even mention explicitly significant numbers of individuals, psychologists have the problem of potentially harmful psychotherapies. Moreover, until recently paid little attention to the problem of haz- the assessment of indicators of failing treatment has until re- ardous treatments. I critically evaluate and update earlier cently received little attention (Mash & Hunsley, 1993; but see conclusions regarding deterioration effects in psycho- Lambert et al., 2003, for a notable exception). therapy, outline methodological obstacles standing in the This state of relative neglect concerning harmful psycholog- way of identifying potentially harmful therapies (PHTs), ical treatments contrasts sharply with the marked recent sci- provide a provisional list of PHTs, discuss the implications entific and media interestˇin the potential negative effects (e.g., of PHTs for clinical science and practice, and delineate suicidality) of psychotropic medications, particularly fluoxetine fruitful areas for further research on PHTs. A heightened (Prozac) and other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors emphasis on PHTs should narrow the scientist–practi- (Sharp & Chapman, 2004). Psychology, of course, has no formal tioner gap and safeguard mental health consumers against equivalent of medicine’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) harm.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadows in the History of Body Psychotherapy
    Shadows in the History of Body Psychotherapy COURTENAY YOUNG & GILL WESTLAND Abstract This article intends to open a discussion and to begin to name, to reflect on, and gradually start healing some of the wounds arising during the development of Body Psychotherapy, particularly during the period 1960-2000. It highlights inherent problems in individuals single-handedly pioneering new methods, and some difficulties in the organisation of the training courses. These reflections generalise to other psychotherapies and have implications for the wider professional field and the future development of Body Psychotherapy . Key Words: Body Psychotherapy, History, Abuse, Shadow, Healing, Ethics Introduction Acknowledging the Shadow Individuals, organisations, countries, and – of course – the profession of Body Psychotherapy, carry their ‘shadow’ aspects. Jung saw the Shadow as a merging of unconscious personal elements with various archetypal contents of the collective unconscious. The Shadow contains the repressed parts of ourselves that we cannot accept and “the less it is embodied in the individual’s conscious life, the blacker and denser it is” (Jung, 1938, CW 11, p. 13, quoted in Samuels, Shorter & Plaut, 1986, p. 138). The Shadow also contains elements that have never emerged into consciousness. The Shadow can only be inferred, often in the form of unconscious projections. These projections can become stronger and more irrational, individually and collectively as the Shadow contents move towards consciousness. The Shadow cannot be eradicated, but it is possible to learn to live with it (Samuels, Shorter & Plaut, 1986). Jung also believed that, "in spite of its function as a reservoir for human darkness—or perhaps because of this—the shadow is the seat of creativity" so that for some, it may be, 'the dark side of his being, his sinister shadow ..
    [Show full text]
  • LITERATURE on NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS in TURKEY and the WEST Süleyman TURAN∗
    Uluslararası Sosyal Aratırmalar Dergisi The Journal of International Social Research Cilt: 6 Sayı: 27 Volume: 6 Issue: 27 Yaz 2013 Summer 2013 www.sosyalarastirmalar.com Issn: 1307-9581 YEN DN HAREKETLERLE LGL TÜRKYE’DEK VE BATI’DAK LTERATÜR LITERATURE ON NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS IN TURKEY AND THE WEST Süleyman TURAN∗ Öz Yeni dini hareket (YDH)’ler, XX. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında ortaya çıkan dini akımları ifade etmektedir. Genellikle küçük gruplar halinde kalma eiliminde oldukları için bu hareketler yakın döneme kadar ya çok az ilgi görmü ya da hiç ilgi çekmemilerdi. Ancak özellikle görsel ve yazılı medyada çıkan haberler sayesinde insanlar YDH’lerden daha fazla haberdar olmaya balamı ve neticede seküler ve sözde rasyonel toplumlarımızda alternatif dünya görüleri ve yaam biçimleri benimseyen ve sunan az sayıda insanın, görünüte acayip inanç ve uygulamaları insanların ilgi ve merakını cezp etmitir. YDH’leri anlamak ve açıklamak üzere Batı’da çok sayıda bilimsel çalıma kaleme alınmıtır. Ülkemizde ise özellikle son on yılda YDH’ler konusunda birçok aratırmanın ortaya konulduunu görmekteyiz. Bu bibliyografya çalımasının amacı, hem Batı’da hem de ülkemizde ortaya konulan çalımaları tespit ederek, YDH’lere ilgi duyan okuyucu ve aratırmacılara literatür verisi salamak ve yeni aratırmalara kapı aralamaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Yeni Dini Hareketler, Dünya Dinleri, Küreselleme, Türkiye. Abstract The term of “new religious movement/s” (NRMs) generally refer to religious trends appeared in second half of 20th century. They generally tend to be so small or last for so short a time that they attracted litle or no attention. Hovewer, yet almost every one has read articles or watch television shows about these groups.
    [Show full text]
  • First Do No Harm, and Then Do Some Good: Science and Professional Responsibility in the Response to Disaster and Trauma
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45340724 First Do No Harm, and Then Do Some Good: Science and Professional Responsibility in the Response to Disaster and Trauma Article Source: OAI CITATIONS READS 5 588 4 authors, including: Jeffrey M Lohr Grant J Devilly University of Arkansas Griffith University 96 PUBLICATIONS 4,239 CITATIONS 95 PUBLICATIONS 3,653 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Determining Sexual Offender Motivational Systems View project The Motivational Influence of Alcohol Preloading View project All content following this page was uploaded by Grant J Devilly on 20 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Response to Disaster 1 Running Head: Response to Disaster First do no harm, and then do some good: Science and professional responsibility in the response to disaster and trauma Jeffrey M. Lohr, Ph.D. University of Arkansas Grant J. Devilly, Ph.D. Swinburne University Scott O. Lilienfeld, Ph.D. Emory University Bunmi O. Olatunji, Ph.D. Vanderbilt University *Address Correspondence to Jeffrey M. Lohr, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, 216 Memorial Hall, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, Phone (479) 575-5813, Fax (479) 575-3219, email: [email protected] Response to Disaster 2 First do no harm, and then do some good: Science and professional responsibility in the response to disaster and trauma Victim traumatology There is little question that mental health practitioners have the primary ethical obligation of Primum Non Nocere: First Do No Harm.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Memory Myths and Realities
    Appendix A: Memory Myths and Realities Myth 1. You must identify the root cause of your unhappiness from the past in order to heal and be happy in the present. Reality 1. It is unfortunately the normal human lot to be frustrated and unhappy at various points in your life. There is no magic pill to make you happy, and your attitude in the present is much more the issue than anything that happened to you in the past. Myth 2. Checklists of “symptoms” are reliable tools to identify disorders. Reality 2. Beware of symptom checklists, particularly if they apply to nearly everyone in the general population. At one time or another, most people experience depres- sion, troubled relationships, ambivalence toward family members, and low self- esteem. These are not necessarily “symptoms” of anything other than the human condition. Myth 3. You can trust any therapist who seems compassionate, warm, wise, and caring. You do not need to ask about credentials, experience, training, philosophy, treat- ment approach, or techniques. Reality 3. Just because a therapist is warm and caring does not mean that he or she is com- petent or can help you. Training, philosophy, and treatment modalities are extremely important. Therapists who dwell unceasingly on your past are unlikely to help you cope with your present-day problems. Therapy should challenge you to change your way of thinking about and dealing with the present-day conflicts that sent you to therapy in the first place. © The Author(s) 2017 421 M. Pendergrast, The Repressed Memory Epidemic, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63375-6 422 Appendix A: Memory Myths and Realities Myth 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Skeptic 2003
    VOLUME 23, NO2 WINTER 2003 A JOURNAL OF FACT AND OPINION P ANDEMONIUM the Skeptic Contents Vol 23, No 2 Regulars Winter 2003 ISSN 0726-9897 ■ 3 – Editorial — Don’t Panic — Barry Williams ■ 4 – Around the Traps — Bunyip Editor ■ 64 – Letters Barry Williams ■ 69 – Notices Contributing Editors Tim Mendham Steve Roberts Features ■ 6 – Pan: The Reaction — Peter Bowditch Technology Consultant ■ 8 – Lessons Still Unlearnt — Stephen Colgan Richard Saunders ■ 11 – The Lead Balloon — Pan, Pan, Pan — Richard Lead ■ 14 – If it Sounds Like a Duck... — Peter Bowditch Chief Investigator ■ 18 – Nutrition Myths — Life in the Raw — Glenn Cardwell Bob Nixon ■ 20 – Agricultural Alternatives — David Conley ■ 24 – Skepticism and Psychotherapy — Jill Gordon All correspondence to: ■ Australian Skeptics Inc 30 – Microwaves, etc — David Vernon PO Box 268 ■ 35 – Hairy Diagnosis — Cholm Williams Roseville NSW 2069 ■ 36 – Homeopathetic — Borek Puza Australia ■ 38 – Hair Today ... — Karen Stollznow (ABN 90 613 095 379 ) ■ 40 – Smoke and Reflections — Martin Hadley Contact Details ■ 43 – Nigerian Letters — Leo Igwe Tel: (02) 9417 2071 ■ 44 – Interview — A Man for all Ages Pt2 — Richard and Geoff Saunders Fax: (02) 9417 7930 ■ 48 – Good Word: A Sea of Words — Mark Newbrook e-mail: [email protected] ■ 53 – Forum: The Doctor is In ■ 55 – Review: A Sober Appraisal — Chris Guest Web Pages ■ Australian Skeptics 56 – Junior Skeptic — Reviews — Belinda Bowditch & Gillian Brown www.skeptics.com.au ■ 58 – Forum: Three More Doors No Answers in Genesis ■ 61 – Getting Involved — Branch Activities http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/default.htm ■ 63 – News: Science TV in Sydney the Skeptic is a journal of fact and opinion, published four times per year by Australian Skeptics Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Treatments to Avoid
    Page 39 Psychological Treatments to Avoid Dr. Timothy C. Thomason, Northern Arizona University Abstract Certain psychological treatments should be avoided, and a list of such treatments would provide valuable guidance for counselors, as well as potential clients. It is well established that some therapies are potentially dangerous, and some fringe therapies are highly unlikely to help clients beyond a placebo effect. This article provides an overview of the need for lists of such treatments, cautions about such lists, and examples of lists of therapies that should be avoided because they are unsafe and/or highly unlikely to be effective. Psychological Treatments to Avoid One issue of interest to counselors and psychotherapists today is the proliferation of new, unproven therapies and a lack of regulation or guidance from professional bodies. Not all psychotherapies are equally safe and effective, and a list of treatments to avoid would help both psychotherapists and clients avoid possibly harmful therapies. It is relatively simple and easy for any counselor, social worker, or psychologist to create a new form of psychotherapy, practice it, and offer training workshops on it, even if there is little or no evidence of its safety or effectiveness. Creativity and innovation should be encouraged, but the creators of new therapies should be expected to conduct enough research to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the new ap- proach. Prospective counseling and psychotherapy clients must often find themselves confused regarding how to select a practitioner or a therapy given the diverse array of types of counseling and psychotherapy available. The field of counseling should directly address the potential for harm, as well as benefit, that may result from counseling (Dimidjian & Hollon, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Novel Unsupported and Empirically Supported Therapies by Licensed Clinical Social Workers Monica Pignotti
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2009 The Use of Novel Unsupported and Empirically Supported Therapies by Licensed Clinical Social Workers Monica Pignotti Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORK THE USE OF NOVEL UNSUPPORTED AND EMPIRICALLY SUPPORTED THERAPIES BY LICENSED CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKERS By MONICA PIGNOTTI A Dissertation submitted to the College of Social Work in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2009 The members of the committee approve the dissertation of Monica Pignotti defended on June 18, 2009. 8 __________________________ Bruce A. Thyer Professor Directi g Dissertatio 8 _________________________ Ke eth Brummel8Smith U i3ersity Represe tati3e 8 _________________________ Martell Teasley Committee Member Appro3ed. _________________________________ Nicholas Ma::a, Dea , College of Social Work The Graduate School has 3erified a d appro3ed the abo3e8 amed committee members. ii I dedicate this to my pare ts, Alfio a d Ruth Pig otti, who ha3e always supported a d e couraged me i pursui g my educatio a d excelle ce i all I do a d who i stilled i me the stro g work ethic it takes to complete a doctoral program. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to ack owledge a d tha k all of the people who stimulated a d e couraged my i terest i the topics of e3ide ce8based practice, critical thi ki g, a d disti guishi g scie ce from pseudoscie ce i me tal health practice i cludi g Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Informed Consent and Psychotherapy: Apples and Oranges in the Garden of Doctrine Stephen Hjelt
    Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 1 3-15-2002 Informed Consent and Psychotherapy: Apples and Oranges in the Garden of Doctrine Stephen Hjelt Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/naalj Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, and the Psychology and Psychiatry Commons Recommended Citation Stephen Hjelt, Informed Consent and Psychotherapy: Apples and Oranges in the Garden of Doctrine, 22 J. Nat’l Ass’n Admin. L. Judges. (2002) available at http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/naalj/vol22/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Informed Consent and Psychotherapy: Apples and Oranges in the Garden of Doctrine1 Judge Stephen Hjelt* INTRODUCTION The amount written about the doctrine of informed consent in the last forty years truly threatens more than one old growth forest. If one searches any of the legal, medical or psychology databases (Westlaw, Medline, Psych-Info), one ends up with "hits" that literally number in the thousands. These writings have increased almost exponentially in the last fifteen years.2 The writings on informed consent are not confined to the dry professional literature of law reviews and psychology journals. They are found in case law, statutes, the ethical principles for medicine and various mental health disciplines, as well as texts, specialty and popular writings.
    [Show full text]