DOCSLIB.ORG

Master Plan of Drainage City of Chino, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Master Plan of Drainage City of Chino, California MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE CITY OF CHINO FINAL REPORT NOVEMBER, 1993 MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE CITY OF CHINO, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: CITY OF CHINO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 13220 Central Avenue Chino, California 91710 Prepared by: BSI Consultants, Inc. 2001 East First Street Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 568-7300 Under the supervision of: Mohammed N.K. Rowther Date TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I INTRODUCTION I.1 GENERAL.......................................................................................................................................................... I-1 I.2 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................................... I-4 I.3 STUDY APPROACH........................................................................................................................................ I-5 I.4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................. I-7 II CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS II.1 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................ II-1 II.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................... II-4 III STUDY AREA III.1 WATERSHED...............................................................................................................................................III-1 III.2 DRAINAGE BASINS ...................................................................................................................................III-1 III.3 DRAINAGE AREAS AND SYSTEMS .......................................................................................................III-4 III.4 SURFACE FLOW PATTERNS...................................................................................................................III-4 III.5 EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM..............................................................................................................III-4 III.6 LAND USE..................................................................................................................................................III-10 III.7 STREET FLOW CAPACITY CURVES...................................................................................................III-19 IV HYDROLOGIC CRITERIA IV.1 GENERAL.....................................................................................................................................................IV-1 IV.2 DESIGN STORM .........................................................................................................................................IV-1 IV.3 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT...........................................................................................................................IV-2 IV.4 RAINFALL INTENSITY..............................................................................................................................IV-2 V HYDRAULIC CRITERIA V.1 GENERAL .......................................................................................................................................................V-1 V.2 MANHOLES ...................................................................................................................................................V-1 V.3 LATERALS ......................................................................................................................................................V-2 V.4 MINIMUM PIPE SIZE....................................................................................................................................V-3 V.5 MINIMUM SLOPE.........................................................................................................................................V-3 V.6 ANGLE OF CONFLUENCE ........................................................................................................................V-3 V.7 INLET LOCATIONS......................................................................................................................................V-4 V.8 OUTLET STRUCTURES..............................................................................................................................V-4 VI MASTER PLANNED FACILITIES VI.1 GENERAL ......................................................................................................................................................VI-1 VI.2 SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS...........................................................................................................................VI-2 VII PROJECT PRIORITY VII.1 GENERAL.................................................................................................................................................. VII-1 VII.2 PROJECT PRIORITY............................................................................................................................... VII-2 VII.3 CAPITAL COST ESTIMATES ................................................................................................................ VII-2 VIII FINANCING OF IMPROVEMENTS VIII.1 GENERAL ...............................................................................................................................................VIII-1 VIII.2 METHODS OF FINANCING...............................................................................................................VIII-1 P:\WP51DATA\SPECS\ROWTHER\RPRTCHNO.FNL FIGURES PAGE FIGURE I-1, VICINITY MAP................................................................................................................................. I-2 FIGURE II-1, FACILITIES MAP - NORTHERN BASIN ...................................................................................II-2 FIGURE II-2, FACILITIES MAP - WESTERN BASIN....................................................................................... II-5 FIGURE II-3, FACILITIES MAP - EASTERN BASIN ........................................................................................ II-7 FIGURE II-4, FACILITIES MAP - EASTERN BASIN ........................................................................................ II-8 FIGURE III-1, BASIN BOUNDARY MAP .........................................................................................................III-2 FIGURE III-2, SURFACE FLOW MAP - NORTHERN BASIN.......................................................................III-5 FIGURE III-3, SURFACE FLOW MAP - WESTERN BASIN ..........................................................................III-6 FIGURE III-4, SURFACE FLOW MAP - EASTERN BASIN............................................................................III-7 FIGURE III-5, SURFACE FLOW MAP - EASTERN BASIN............................................................................III-8 FIGURE III-6, EXISTING FACILITIES MAP - NORTHERN BASIN............................................................ III-9 FIGURE III-7, EXISTING FACILITIES MAP - WESTERN BASIN...............................................................III-11 FIGURE III-8, EXISTING FACILITIES MAP - EASTERN BASIN................................................................III-12 FIGURE III-9, EXISTING FACILITIES MAP - EASTERN BASIN................................................................III-13 FIGURE III-10, LAND USE MAP......................................................................................................................III-14 FIGURE IV-1, SOILS MAP...................................................................................................................................IV-3 FIGURE IV-2, ISOHYETALS - 10-YEAR 1 HOUR ...........................................................................................IV-4 FIGURE IV-3, ISOHYETALS - 100-YEAR 1 HOUR .........................................................................................IV-5 FIGURE IV-4, ISOHYETALS - 100-YEAR 6 HOUR .........................................................................................IV-6 FIGURE IV-5, ISOHYETALS - 100-YEAR 24 HOUR .......................................................................................IV-7 FIGURE VI-1 TO VI-80, SYSTEM MAPS ........................................................................................................ VI-26 FIGURE VII-1, PRIORITY MAP - NORTHERN BASIN ................................................................................ VII-4 FIGURE VII-2, PRIORITY MAP - WESTERN BASIN.................................................................................... VII-5 FIGURE VII-3, PRIORITY MAP - EASTERN BASIN ..................................................................................... VII-6 FIGURE VII-4, PRIORITY MAP - EASTERN BASIN ..................................................................................... VII-7 TABLES TABLE II-1, PLANNED FACILITIES - NORTHERN BASIN ........................................................................... II-3 TABLE II-2, PLANNED FACILITIES - WESTERN BASIN............................................................................... II-6 TABLE II-3, PLANNED FACILITIES - EASTERN BASIN ................................................................................ II-9 TABLE III-1, LAND USE CLASSIFICATION .................................................................................................III-15 TABLE III-2, LAND
Load more

Recommended publications
  • III. General Description of Environmental Setting Acres, Or Approximately 19 Percent of the City’S Area
    III. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING A. Overview of Environmental Setting Section 15130 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires an EIR to include a discussion of the cumulative impacts of a proposed project when the incremental effects of a project are cumulatively considerable. Cumulative impacts are defined as impacts that result from the combination of the proposed project evaluated in the EIR combined with other projects causing related impacts. Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Section 15125 (c) of the State CEQA Guidelines requires an EIR to include a discussion on the regional setting that the project site is located within. Detailed environmental setting descriptions are contained in each respective section, as presented in Chapter IV of this Draft EIR. B. Project Location The City of Ontario (City) is in the southwestern corner of San Bernardino County and is surrounded by the Cities of Chino and Montclair, and unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County to the west; the Cities of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga to the north; the City of Fontana and unincorporated land in San Bernardino County to the east; the Cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley to the east and south. The City is in the central part of the Upper Santa Ana River Valley. This portion of the valley is bounded by the San Gabriel Mountains to the north; the Chino Hills, Puente Hills, and San Jose Hills to the west; the Santa Ana River to the south; and Lytle Creek Wash on the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Chino Dairy Area Desalination and Reclamation Project
    T WaterSMAR Lower Chino Dairy Area Desalination and Reclamation Project WaterSMART Title XVI Water Reclamation and Reuse Program, FY 2017, FOA No. BOR-DO-17-F002 Previous Agreements: R11AC35306, R12AC35339, R14AC00049 and R15AC00059 Inland Empire Utilities Agency Jason Gu, Grants Officer 6075 Kimball Avenue [email protected] Chino, CA 91708 (909) 993 - 1636 tel, (909) 606-7364 fax Proposal Contents Attachments .................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... iii Section 1: Technical Proposal ....................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ............................................................................... 1 1.2 Technical Project Description ................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Project Description and Background Information ....................... 3 1.2.2 Project Activities ......................................................................... 9 Task 1 – Environmental Documentation/National Environmental Policy Act Compliance...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Report
    WATER QUALITY REPORT West Valley Connector Project April 2018 (Updated January 2020) 2018 Revision Log Date Description April 2018 Original report prepared January 2020 Project schedule update Mitigation measures update Water Quality Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... i List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ vii Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Location and Setting ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................... 2 Project Description ...................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Proposed Project .................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Phase I/Milliken Alignment ....................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Phase II/Haven Alignment ........................................................................ 6 2.2 Project Alternatives .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego County Riverside County Orange County
    Chino Creek Middle Santa Ana River San Timoteo Wash Middle Santa Ana River Little Morongo Creek-Morongo Wash San Gabriel River 18070106 San Gorgonio River Headwaters Whitewater River Lower Santa Ana River Middle San Jacinto River Santa Ana River 18070203 Upper Whitewater River Temescal Wash Santiago Creek San Jacinto River 18070202 Whitewater River 18100201 San Diego Creek Lower San Jacinto River Upper San Jacinto River Newport Bay 18070204 Palm Canyon Wash O r a n g e C o u n t y RR ii vv ee rr ss ii dd ee CC oo uu nn tt yy Middle Whitewater River O r a n g e C o u n t y Middle San Jacinto River Newport Bay-Frontal Pacific Ocean San Jacinto River Deep Canyon Newport Bay-Frontal Pacific Ocean San Juan Creek Murrieta Creek Aliso Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Aliso Creek-San Onofre Creek 18070301 Wilson Creek Lower Whitewater River San Mateo Creek Santa Margarita River 18070302 Aliso Creek-San Onofre Creek Santa Margarita River Lower Temecula Creek Aliso Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Salton Sea 18100204 Santa Margarita River Upper Temecula Creek Coyote Creek Clark Valley San Felipe Creek San Onofre Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Camp Pendleton Bank Property Middle San Luis Rey River Upper San Luis Rey River Lower San Luis Rey River Escondido Creek-San Luis Rey River San Felipe Creek 18100203 Escondido Creek-San Luis Rey River 18070303 Borrego Valley-Borrego Sink Wash Escondido Creek San Marcos Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Upper Santa Ysabel Creek 8-digit HUC Upper San Felipe Creek Sevice Areas Lower Santa Ysabel
    [Show full text]
  • Prado Basin Sediment Management Demonstration Project Biological Conditions Technical Report
    PRADO BASIN SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS TECHNICAL REPORT Prepared By Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Contact: Richard Zembal Daniel Bott July 2013 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................1-1 2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 2-1 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Regional Setting ................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Local Setting ......................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Relevant Biological Resource Management Programs ......................... 3-8 4.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................4-1 4.1 Methodology ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Vegetation Communities ....................................................................... 4-3 4.3 Sensitive Communities/Special Status Plants ..................................... 4-11 4.4 Wildlife ................................................................................................4-19 4.5 Wildlife Movement Corridors ............................................................... 4-51 5.0 SUMMARY OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .......................................... 5-1 6.0
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Control District Interim Director  Brendon Biggs, M.S., P.E
    825 East Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0835 | Phone: 909.387.7910 Fax: 909.387.7911 Luther Snoke Flood Control District Interim Director Brendon Biggs, M.S., P.E. Chief Flood Control Engineer NOTICE OF EXTENDED PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD RE NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA)/ NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI) TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CARBON CANYON CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CHINO HILLS, CALIFORNIA The San Bernardino County Flood Control District (District) prepared a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the construction and maintenance of flood control improvements to the Carbon Canyon Flood Control Channel in the City of Chino Hills, California from an existing interim channel to an ultimate condition channel (See attached Figure 1: Regional Location) (Project). The Project goal is to reduce the risk of flooding during a 100-year storm event by increasing the capacity and conveyance of the District-maintained facility. The site is generally located within an area characterized as urbanized, primarily with single family residences to the north and south of the channel. There is a large Southern California Edison (SCE) right-of-way (ROW) south of the channel, intersecting the channel in two locations. There is a church complex at the west end of the channel (Chino Valley Community Church) as well as a recreational field with irrigated grass and ornamental plants that borders Little Chino Creek. There are commercial uses at the east end near Pipeline Avenue. The Project area covers approximately 4,850 linear feet in length and 150 feet in width where the existing interim channel already exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Design Report for the Chino Creek Wellfield and Chino II Expansion Wellfield Chino Desalter Phase 3 Project, Prepared for Western Municipal Water District
    PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT For the CHINO CREEK WELLFIELD WELLS I-19, I-20 AND I-21 Prepared for CHINO BASIN DESALTER AUTHORITY 2151 South Haven Avenue, Suite 202 Ontario, California 91761 And WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, (PROGRAM MANAGER) 14205 Meridian Parkway Riverside, California 92518 July 29, 2011 CONTENTS REFERENCES USED…………………………………………………………..………………………..….1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………...………..…..4 Figure 1: Project Location………………………………………………………..……..….. 5 GEOHYDROLOGIC SETTING…………………………………………………………………….………6 Figure 2: Geologic Setting………………………………………………………………….. 7 EXPECTED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS……………………………………………………….………8 Figure 3a: Lithologic Cross-Section…………………………………………………..………9 Figure 3b: Lithologic Cross-Section Map View……………………………..………………..9 ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION AND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED WELLS……………10 Figure 4: Well Site Considerations…………………………………………….…...............11 GROUND WATER QUALITY……………………………………………………………………………12 Table 1: Water Quality Summary of Existing CDA Wells…………………………..........13 Figure 5: Ground Water Chemistry of Chino Creek Area………………………………….15 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS…………………………………………………………………….16 Table 2: Required Permits and Governing Agencies……………………………………...17 WELL SITE CONSIDERATIONS…………………………………………………………………...……18 PROPOSED WELL SITE: I-19……………………………………………………………….....................18 Figure 6a: Proposed Well Site I-19………………………………………………………….19 PROPOSED WELL SITE: I-20…………………………………………………….…………………..…..20 Figure 6b: Proposed Well Site I-20…………………………………….……………………21 PROPOSED WELL
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ana River Watermaster
    SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. CITY OF CHINO, et al. CASE NO. 117628--COUNTY OF ORANGE WATERMASTER MAILING ADDRESS Richard W. Atwater c/o SBVMWD Bill B. Dendy Post Office Box 5906 Samuel H. Fuller San Bernardino CA 92412-5906 Craig D. Miller Telephone 909/387-9200 John V. Rossi FAX 909/387-9247 April 30, 2008 To: Clerk of Superior Court of Orange County and all Parties Re: Watermaster Report for Water Year October 1, 2006 - September 30, 2007 Ladies and Gentlemen: We have the honor of submitting herewith the Thirty-Seventh Annual Report of the Santa Ana River Watermaster. The supporting basic data Appendices are bound separately. The principal findings of the Watermaster for the water year 2006-07 are as follows: At Prado 1 Measured Outflow at Prado 156,147 acre-feet 2 Base Flow at Prado 129,830 acre-feet 3 Annual Weighted TDS in Base and Storm Flows 604 mg/L 4 Annual Adjusted Base Flow 140,216 acre-feet 5 Cumulative Adjusted Base Flow 4,528,055 acre-feet 6 Other Credits (Debits) 5,531 acre-feet 7 Cumulative Entitlement of OCWD 1,554,000 acre-feet 8 Cumulative Credit 3,004,419 acre-feet 9 One-Third of Cumulative Debit 0 acre-feet 10 Minimum Required Base Flow in 2007-08 34,000 acre-feet SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER FOR ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. CITY OF CHINO, et al. CASE NO. 117628 - COUNTY OF ORANGE THIRTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER FOR WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1, 2006 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 APRIL 30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I - WATERMASTER ACTIVITIES AND WATER CONDITIONS Introduction........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 11073360 Chino Creek at Schaefer Avenue, Near Chino, CA Santa Ana River Basin
    Water-Data Report 2013 11073360 Chino Creek at Schaefer Avenue, near Chino, CA Santa Ana River Basin LOCATION.--Lat 34°00′14″, long 117°43′34″ referenced to North American Datum of 1927, San Bernardino County, CA, Hydrologic Unit 18070203, in Santa Ana del Chino Grant, on right bank, 300 ft downstream from old Schaefer Avenue Bridge, 0.8 mi downstream from San Antonio Creek, and 1.5 mi southwest of Chino. DRAINAGE AREA.--48.9 mi². SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1969 to current year. CHEMICAL DATA: Water year 1998. SEDIMENT DATA: Water year 1998. REVISED RECORDS.--WDR CA-84-1: 1983 (instantaneous maximum discharge). WDR CA-95-1: 1992, 1993. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder and concrete-lined flood-control channel. Concrete dikes formed low-water control from October 1975 to Apr. 16, 1991. Elevation of gage is 685 ft above NGVD of 1929, from topographic map. REMARKS.--Records rated good. Since 1997, due to construction in area of gage, Schaefer Avenue no longer extends to the Chino Creek crossing. The Schaefer Avenue Bridge, however, remains. Flow mostly regulated by San Antonio Flood-Control Reservoir, capacity, 7,700 acre-ft. Natural streamflow affected by extensive ground-water withdrawals, diversions for power, domestic use, irrigation, and return flow from irrigated areas. Releases of imported water are made to the basin by the California Water Project at times in some years, via San Antonio Creek from Rialto Pipeline below San Antonio Dam, at a site approximately 11 mi upstream. During the current year, there were no reported releases from the California Water Project into the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ana River Watermaster
    SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. CITY OF CHINO, et al. CASE NO. 117628--COUNTY OF ORANGE WATERMASTER MAILING ADDRESS Samuel H. Fuller c/o SBVMWD Roy L. Herndon 380 East Vanderbilt Way Thomas A. Love San Bernardino CA 92408-3593 Michael R. Markus Telephone (909) 387-9200 John V. Rossi FAX (909) 387-9247 April 30, 2011 To: Clerk of Superior Court of Orange County and all Parties Re: Watermaster Report for Water Year October 1, 2009 - September 30, 2010 Ladies and Gentlemen: We have the honor of submitting herewith the Fortieth Annual Report of the Santa Ana River Watermaster. The supporting basic data Appendices are bound separately. The principal findings of the Watermaster for the water year 2009-10 are as follows: At Prado 1 Measured Outflow at Prado 243,776 acre-feet 2 Base Flow at Prado 103,099 acre-feet 3 Annual Weighted TDS in Base and Storm Flows 443 mg/L 4 Annual Adjusted Base Flow 125,179 acre-feet 5 Cumulative Adjusted Base Flow 4,905,004 acre-feet 6 Other Credits (Debits) 1,489 acre-feet 7 Cumulative Entitlement of OCWD 1,680,000 acre-feet 8 Cumulative Credit 3,263,211 acre-feet 9 One-Third of Cumulative Debit 0 acre-feet 10 Minimum Required Base Flow in 2010-11 34,000 acre-feet SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER FOR ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. CITY OF CHINO, et al. CASE NO. 117628 - COUNTY OF ORANGE FORTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER FOR WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1, 2009 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 APRIL 30, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I - WATERMASTER ACTIVITIES AND WATER CONDITIONS Introduction ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Oil Resources of the Eastern Puente Hills Area, Southern California
    LIBRARY COPY .'11'~- · ,!l.'::.,~ARVJ Geology and Oil Resources of the Eastern Puente Hills Area, Southern California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 420-B ) ;q:;j r.j n ':1 ,.., rJ (\] r; "\' r-' I \--~ .\1 1.1: t.-..1 'c) \.~;) ..., ~i,;.. l I s_.: r; '.JG r. ~-J r g) n :H.;~~.. ~,~ :, ~v: JUN 3 .!971 Geology and Oil Resources of the Eastern Puente Hills Area, Southern California By D. L. DURHAM and R. F. YERKES GEOLOGY OF THE EASTERN LOS ANGELES BASIN, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 420-B A study of the stratigraphy, structure, and oil resources of the Prado Dam and . Yorba Linda quadrangles I:IBRARY 8UAfAU OF UINil ~.-I'BRARY SPOkANl. ~AStt, .. \ D 31971 !J!t"':l.: 1 -~ ·-··:~.:::.~ .... ~ titlSf lfTOIA 10 liBRAII UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRIN.TING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 .f UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR· STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director .• I . For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 CONTENTS I .. Page Stratigraphy-Continued Page Abstract------------------------------------------- B1 Quaternary system _________________ ------------- B28 Introduction_______________________________________ 3 Pleistocene series ________ ------------------- 28 Locution of urea________________________________ 3 Unnamed strata of Pleistocene age __ ---_-- 28 • Purpose of investigation_________________________ 3 La Habra formation ______ -------------- 28 Previous work__________________________________ 4 Pleistocene to Recent series ____ -------------- 30 Older alluvium _______ - ____ ------------- 30 Fieldwork and preparation of report_______________ 5 Younger alluvium ______ -_-------------- 31 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 5 Structure _________________________________________ _ 31 Strntigruphy _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 Structural setting _______________________ -------- 31 Cretaceous system ______ :.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study
    INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CHINO HILLS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 13GPA02 Prepared by: City of Chino Hills Community Development Department 14000 City Center Drive Chino Hills, CA 91709 Attention: Jerrod Walters, Associate Planner May 22, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1 Enviornmental Factors Potentially Affected ...................................................................... 12 Determination .................................................................................................................... 12 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ................................................................................ 13 Environmental Impacts Checklist ...................................................................................... 14 Mandatory Findings of Significance .................................................................................. 29 LIST OF TABLES Table No. Page No. LU-1 Draft General Plan Update Land Use Plan Designations & Acreages ............................... 7 LU-2 Existing General Plan Land Use by Designation, Acreage and % of Total Acreage .............................................................................................................................. 8 LU-3 Existing Developed Land Use by Land Use Designation, Acreage and % of Total
    [Show full text]