DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology and Oil Resources of the Eastern Puente Hills Area, Southern California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology and Oil Resources of the Eastern Puente Hills Area, Southern California LIBRARY COPY .'11'~- · ,!l.'::.,~ARVJ Geology and Oil Resources of the Eastern Puente Hills Area, Southern California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 420-B ) ;q:;j r.j n ':1 ,.., rJ (\] r; "\' r-' I \--~ .\1 1.1: t.-..1 'c) \.~;) ..., ~i,;.. l I s_.: r; '.JG r. ~-J r g) n :H.;~~.. ~,~ :, ~v: JUN 3 .!971 Geology and Oil Resources of the Eastern Puente Hills Area, Southern California By D. L. DURHAM and R. F. YERKES GEOLOGY OF THE EASTERN LOS ANGELES BASIN, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 420-B A study of the stratigraphy, structure, and oil resources of the Prado Dam and . Yorba Linda quadrangles I:IBRARY 8UAfAU OF UINil ~.-I'BRARY SPOkANl. ~AStt, .. \ D 31971 !J!t"':l.: 1 -~ ·-··:~.:::.~ .... ~ titlSf lfTOIA 10 liBRAII UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRIN.TING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 .f UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR· STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director .• I . For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 CONTENTS I .. Page Stratigraphy-Continued Page Abstract------------------------------------------- B1 Quaternary system _________________ ------------- B28 Introduction_______________________________________ 3 Pleistocene series ________ ------------------- 28 Locution of urea________________________________ 3 Unnamed strata of Pleistocene age __ ---_-- 28 • Purpose of investigation_________________________ 3 La Habra formation ______ -------------- 28 Previous work__________________________________ 4 Pleistocene to Recent series ____ -------------- 30 Older alluvium _______ - ____ ------------- 30 Fieldwork and preparation of report_______________ 5 Younger alluvium ______ -_-------------- 31 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 5 Structure _________________________________________ _ 31 Strntigruphy _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 Structural setting _______________________ -------- 31 Cretaceous system ______ :.. ___________ ~___________ 5 Whittier fault zone ________________ ------------- 31 PI utonic rocks______________________________ 5 Chino fault_ ______________________ ------------- 32 Sedimentary rocks__________________________ 5 Structural features north of the Whittier fault zone Tertiary system_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6 and west of the Chino fault ___________________ _ 34 Faults ____________________________________ _ Paleocene series_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6 34 Folds _____________________________________ _ Silverado formation______________________ 6 34 Eocene series_______________________________ 6 Structural features northeast of the eastern Puente Hills _______________________________________ _ 34 Santiago formation______________________ 6 Structural features south of the eastern Puente Upper Eocene to lower Miocene series_________ 7 Hills _______________________________________ _ 35 Vaqueros unci Sespe formations undiffer- Phy~ography _____________________________________ _ 35 entiated_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 Eastern Puente Hills _________ ------------------- 35 Middle Miocene series_______________________ 8 Santa Ana River ______________________________ _ 35 Topanga formation______________________ 8 Area south of the Puente Hills _________ - __ ------- 36 Diamond Bar sand____________________ 10 Whittier fault zone __________ ------------------- 37 Volc~mic rocks associated with the Topanga Economic geology ______________ -------------------- 37 formation____________________________ 10 Brea-Olinda oil field ______________________ ------- 37 Richfield oil field ______________________________ - Upper Miocene series________________________ 11 39 East Coyote oil field _______________ --- __ -------- 40 Puente formation_______________________ 11 Yorba Linda oil field _______________ ------------- 40 La Vida member____________________ 12 Esperanza oil field ___________ ------------------- 41 Soquel member_____________________ 18 Mahala oil field _____________ -- ____ ------------- 41 Yorba member_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HI Chino-Soquel oil field ______________ ------------- 42 Sycamore Canyon member___________ 21 Summary of oil occurrence __________ ------------- 42 Diubasic intrusive rocks associated with Outlook for future development _____ ------------- 43 the Puente and older formations________ 23 Exploratory wells __________________ ------------- 44 Pliocene series______________________________ 24 Fossil localities ____ :.. ___________________ -- ____ ------- 55 Fernando formation_____________________ 24 San Juan tunneL __________________________________ - 57 Lower mom bcr _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 25 References cited _______________________ --- ___ ------- 59 Upper member_____________________ 26 Index ____________________________________________ _ 61 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates arc in pocket] PLATE 1. Geologic map of Prado Dam and Yorba Linda quadrangles, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. California. 2. Composite stratigraphic section for the eastern Puente Hills area. 3. Geologic sections A-A', B-B', C-C', and D-D', Prado Dam and Yorba Linda quadrangles, California. 4. Geologic sections E-E', F-F', G-G', and H-H', Prado Dam and Yorba Linda quadrangles, California. Page FIGURE 1. Index map of part of southern California showing location of the eastern Puente Hills area ______ ------------ B3 2. Aerial view of the eastern Puente Hills area ______________________________ ----------------------------- 4 III IV CONTENTS Page FIGURE 3. Sandstone and conglomerate of the Vaqueros and Sespe formations undifferentiated ______ ~ _________________ _ B7 4. View northward across the Santa Ana River toward Scully Hill_ _________________________________________ _ 8 5. Pebbly sandstone of the Topanga formation ___________________________________________________________ _ 8 6. Siltstone of the La Vida member of the Puente formation _______________________________________________ _ 13 7. Sandstone unit at the base of the Soquel member of the Puente formation ________________________________ _ 19 8. Siltstone and thin sandstone beds of the Yorba member of the Puente formation __________________________ _ 20 9. Thick-bedded sandstone in siltstone of the Yorba member of the Puente formation ________________________ _ 20 10. White pebbly sandstone of the Sycamore Canyon member of the Puente formation ________________________ _ 21 11. Vertical beds of pebbly sandstone and mudstone of the Sycamore Canyon member of the Puente formation ___ _ 22 12. Basal conglomerate of the La Habra formation ________________________________________________________ _ 29 13. Aerial view southeastward along the Whittier fault zone southeast of the Horseshoe Bend of the Santa Ana ·~o River __________________________________________________________________________________________ _ 32 14. Aerial view southeastward along the Whittier fault zone southeast of Carbon Canyon ______________________ _ 33 15. Exposure of the Chino fault _________________________________________________________________________ _ 33 16. Aerial view northeastward up Brea Canyon from over the Whittier fault zone _____________________________ _ 36 • 17. Correlation chart of the producing zones in the oil fields in the eastern Puente Hills area ___________________ _ 38 18. Strata of the Sycamore Canyon member of the Puente formation exposed at the working face of the San Juan tunnel __________________________________________________________________________________________ _ 57 19. Geologic structure section along the San Juan tunneL---------------------------------------------,------ 58 20. Strata of the Sycamore Canyon member of the Puente formation exposed in the San Juan tunneL ___ -------- 59 21. Sample of the Sycamore Canyon member of the Puente formation from the San Juan tunneL _______________ _ 59 TABLES TABLE 1. Stratigraphic distribution of Foraminifera from the Puente and Fernando formations in the eastern Puente Hills area----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B16 2. Production and reserves of oil fields in the eastern Puente Hills area_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 39 3. Oil produced in 1957 from members of the Puente and Fernando formations in oil fields in the eastern Puente Hills area----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 42 4. Exploratory wells and selected oil-producing wells drilled in the eastern Puente Hills area before June 30, 1958__ 44 5. Fossil localities in the eastern Puente Hills area____________________________________________________________ 56 ,. GEOLOGY OF THE EASTERN LOS ANGELES. BASIN, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY AND OIL RESOURCES OF THE EASTERN PUENTE HILLS AREA, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA • By D. L. DURHAM and R. F. YERKES ABSTRACT Andesitic and basaltic flows as much as 200 feet thick over­ • lie the Topanga formation in the subsurface at some places The Puente Hills are 15 to 40 miles southeast of downtown in the Yorba Linda quadrangle. 'l'hese volcanic rocks are in Lon Angeles, in the northeastern part of the Los Angeles basin. turn overlain at some places in the same area by the Dia­ The eastern half of the Puente Hills is covered by the Prado mond Bar sand of the Topanga formation. Neither the vol­ Dam and Yorba J.Jinda 7:Jh-minute quadrangles. The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Report MAY 20, 2019 Prepared by Maury Edwards Environmental Chair
    Environmental Report MAY 20, 2019 Prepared by Maury Edwards Environmental Chair Whittier Narrow Dam Repairs The Army Corps of Engineers has expressed concerns that the flood control dam at Whittier Narrows is likely to fail in the event of a severe storm event. This would cause extensive flooding in downstream communities affecting over one million Southern California residents. Although Hacienda Heights would not be directly affected the adjacent communities of Pico Rivera, Santa Fee Springs and Whittier are at risk. Congresswomen Grace Napolitano is requesting FY 20 funding to repair the dam. The final environmental impact statement is expected to be released in May that would allow for the project design and construction starting in 2019 with completion in 2025. L.A. County Board of Supervisors rejects Quemetco plant Expansion The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted on February 19 to oppose the expansion of the Quemtco battery recycling plant located in the City of Industry. The vote was unanimous and a five signature letter will be sent to state and regional environmental agencies requesting that deny Quemetco permission to expand operation by 25 percent. There are too many unanswered questions regarding toxic emissions and release. Hacienda Heights Improvement Association and the His Lai Temple members voiced concerns at the Council meeting. Those attending were and voicing concerns were Scott Martin, President; Board Members Adriana Quinonis; Jennifer Kelly and Lucy Pedregon. Letters from past present Mike Williams and former environmental chairman Joan Licari were also presented. Gina Ooi represented the His Lai Buddhist Temple. The situation with Quemtco is closely being monitored by Congressman Ian Calderon's office and any decisions in regard to Quemtco's expansion plans will be forwarded to all concerned parties.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.9 Utilities
    LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2 0 1 6 GENERAL PLAN LAND US E AND URBAN DESIGN E LEMENTS CITY OF LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 4.9 UTILITIES 4.9.1 Introduction This section describes the utility providers currently serving the planning area and evaluates the potential impacts of the City of Long Beach (City) General Plan Land Use Element and Urban Design Element (LUE/UDE) project (proposed project) on utility providers. This section is based on multiple data sources, including the Conservation Element (1973) of the City of Long Beach (City) General Plan and the proposed General Plan Land Use and Urban Design Elements (February 2016) (Appendix F), as well as coordination with potentially affected utility providers. Specific references are identified within the subsection for each respective issue. This section addresses the following utility service systems (service providers are noted in parenthesis): Solid Waste (Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts [LACSD]) Wastewater (Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts [LACSD]) Water (Long Beach Water Department [LBWD]) 4.9.2 Methodology After the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was issued, water, wastewater, and solid waste demands were modeled for build out of the proposed project. These calculations were modeled on a citywide basis. Generation rates obtained from applicable service providers were applied to both the existing (2012) land uses and the 2040 land uses proposed as part of the project. The net difference between the 2040 demand for utilities was then compared with the existing demand to generate the project-related increase in demand for water, wastewater treatment, and solid waste facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Insurance Study Number 06037Cv001b
    VOLUME 1 OF 4 LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Community Community Community Community Community Community Community Name Number Name Number Name Number Name Number LOS ANGELES COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED 065043 DIAMOND BAR, CITY OF 060741 LAWNDALE, CITY OF* 060134 SAN DIMAS, CITY OF 060154 AREAS SAN FERNANDO, CITY AGOURA HILLS, CITY OF 065072 DOWNEY, CITY OF 060645 LOMITA, CITY OF* 060135 060628 OF* ALHAMBRA, CITY OF* 060095 DUARTE, CITY OF 065026 LONG BEACH, CITY OF 060136 SAN GABRIEL, CITY OF* 065055 ARCADIA, CITY OF 065014 EL MONTE, CITY OF* 060658 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF 060137 SAN MARINO, CITY OF* 065057 ARTESIA, CITY OF* 060097 EL SEGUNDO, CITY OF 060118 LYNWOOD, CITY OF 060635 SANTA CLARITA, CITY OF 060729 SANTA FE SPRINGS, CITY AVALON, CITY OF 060098 GARDENA, CITY OF 060119 MALIBU, CITY OF 060745 060158 OF MANHATTAN BEACH, CITY AZUSA, CITY OF 065015 GLENDALE, CITY OF 065030 060138 SANTA MONICA, CITY OF 060159 OF BALDWIN PARK, CITY OF* 060100 GLENDORA, CITY OF 065031 MAYWOOD, CITY OF* 060651 SIERRA MADRE, CITY OF 065059 HAWAIIAN GARDENS, BELL GARDENS, CITY OF 060656 065032 MONROVIA, CITY OF 065046 SIGNAL HILL, CITY OF* 060161 CITY OF* SOUTH EL MONTE, CITY BELL, CITY OF* 060101 HAWTHORNE, CITY OF* 060123 MONTEBELLO, CITY OF 060141 060162 OF* HERMOSA BEACH, CITY BELLFLOWER, CITY OF 060102 060124 MONTEREY PARK, CITY OF* 065047 SOUTH GATE, CITY OF 060163 OF SOUTH PASADENA, CITY BEVERLY HILLS, CITY OF* 060655 HIDDEN HILLS, CITY OF 060125 NORWALK, CITY OF 060652 065061 OF* HUNTINGTON PARK, CITY BRADBURY, CITY
    [Show full text]
  • III. General Description of Environmental Setting Acres, Or Approximately 19 Percent of the City’S Area
    III. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING A. Overview of Environmental Setting Section 15130 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires an EIR to include a discussion of the cumulative impacts of a proposed project when the incremental effects of a project are cumulatively considerable. Cumulative impacts are defined as impacts that result from the combination of the proposed project evaluated in the EIR combined with other projects causing related impacts. Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Section 15125 (c) of the State CEQA Guidelines requires an EIR to include a discussion on the regional setting that the project site is located within. Detailed environmental setting descriptions are contained in each respective section, as presented in Chapter IV of this Draft EIR. B. Project Location The City of Ontario (City) is in the southwestern corner of San Bernardino County and is surrounded by the Cities of Chino and Montclair, and unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County to the west; the Cities of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga to the north; the City of Fontana and unincorporated land in San Bernardino County to the east; the Cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley to the east and south. The City is in the central part of the Upper Santa Ana River Valley. This portion of the valley is bounded by the San Gabriel Mountains to the north; the Chino Hills, Puente Hills, and San Jose Hills to the west; the Santa Ana River to the south; and Lytle Creek Wash on the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Agenda Report
    Adjourned Meeting 09-29-20 Item 3.B.4. Council Agenda Report To: Mayor Pierson and the Honorable Members of the City Council Prepared by: Yolanda Bundy, Environmental Sustainability Director Approved by: Reva Feldman, City Manager Date prepared: September 9, 2020 Meeting date: September 29, 2020 Subject: Response to the Los Angeles County Grand Jury’s Report Entitled “A Diet for Landfills: Cutting Down on Food Waste” RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the City of Malibu’s response letter to the Los Angeles County Grand Jury’s report entitled “A Diet for Landfills: Cutting Down on Food Waste.” FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. WORK PLAN: This item was not included in the Adopted Work Plan for Fiscal year 2020-2021. This is part of normal staff operations. DISCUSSION: In the State of California, civil grand juries are authorized to “investigate and report upon the operations, accounts, and records of the officers, department, functions, and the method or system of performing the duties of any such city or joint powers agency and make such recommendations as it may deem proper and fit.” (Cal. Penal Code 925(a)). On July 31, 2020, the Los Angeles County Grand Jury (Grand Jury) issued the report entitled “A Diet for Landfills: Cutting Down on Food Waste” (Report). In the Report, the Grand Jury identified several opportunities for supportive public policies that can incentivize and create avenues to increase food waste recycling and organic waste diversion rates. At the conclusion of the Report, the Grand Jury requested a response from the City of Malibu (City) to Recommendations 1.1, 1.3, 1.8, and 1.14.
    [Show full text]
  • Land, Labor, and Livestock the Uses of the Puente Hills Region, 1769-1880
    Land, Labor, and Livestock The Uses of the Puente Hills Region, 1769-1880 John Macias PhD Program in History Claremont Graduate University Claremont, CA 91711 July 2006 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 List of Illustrations 4 Introduction 5 The Spanish Era 1769-1821 8 The Mexican Era 1821-1848 16 Impacts on the La Puente Area 19 The American Era 1848-1880 27 Conclusion 37 Bibliography 38 3 Acknowledgments This project could not have been completed without the assistance and guidance from a certain number of people and archives. First of all, I would like to personally thank Mr. Paul R. Spitzzeri, Collections Manager of the Workman and Temple Family Homestead Museum in the City of Industry. Mr. Spitzzeri has not only been resourceful in his knowledge of Rancho La Puente, but his generosity and sincerity in providing key documents was the critical element in describing how the Puente Hills has played a vital part in the history of Southern California. Paul, I can’t thank you enough for this. I would also like to personally thank Ms. Lynn Bremer, Director of the Santa Barbara Mission Archive-Library. Ms. Bremer was kind enough to send me a copy of a letter dated in 1816, which underscores the importance of the Puente Hills area to the missionaries at Mission San Gabriel. I also want to thank Dr. Janet Farrell Brodie of Claremont Graduate University for not only giving me critical feedback on this paper, but the opportunity to even write it. Much gratitude has to be given to the Puente Hills Landfill Habitat Authority for their charitableness in allowing us to write a piece of local history.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Chino Dairy Area Desalination and Reclamation Project
    T WaterSMAR Lower Chino Dairy Area Desalination and Reclamation Project WaterSMART Title XVI Water Reclamation and Reuse Program, FY 2017, FOA No. BOR-DO-17-F002 Previous Agreements: R11AC35306, R12AC35339, R14AC00049 and R15AC00059 Inland Empire Utilities Agency Jason Gu, Grants Officer 6075 Kimball Avenue [email protected] Chino, CA 91708 (909) 993 - 1636 tel, (909) 606-7364 fax Proposal Contents Attachments .................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... iii Section 1: Technical Proposal ....................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ............................................................................... 1 1.2 Technical Project Description ................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Project Description and Background Information ....................... 3 1.2.2 Project Activities ......................................................................... 9 Task 1 – Environmental Documentation/National Environmental Policy Act Compliance...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Report
    WATER QUALITY REPORT West Valley Connector Project April 2018 (Updated January 2020) 2018 Revision Log Date Description April 2018 Original report prepared January 2020 Project schedule update Mitigation measures update Water Quality Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... i List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ vii Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Location and Setting ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................... 2 Project Description ...................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Proposed Project .................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Phase I/Milliken Alignment ....................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Phase II/Haven Alignment ........................................................................ 6 2.2 Project Alternatives .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gis Mapping of Biological Studies in the Puente-Chino Hills Wildlife Corridor Including Species Diversity and Relative Abundance
    GIS MAPPING OF BIOLOGICAL STUDIES IN THE PUENTE-CHINO HILLS WILDLIFE CORRIDOR INCLUDING SPECIES DIVERSITY AND RELATIVE ABUNDANCE A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Fullerton In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science In Environmental Studies By Melanie Marie Schlotterbeck 2001 SIGNATURE PAGE PROJECT: GIS MAPPING OF BIOLOGICAL STUDIES IN THE PUENTE-CHINO HILLS WILDLIFE CORRIDOR INCLUDING SPECIES DIVERSITY AND RELATIVE ABUNDANCE AUTHOR: Melanie Marie Schlotterbeck DATE SUBMITTED: May 17, 2001 Department of Environmental Studies Dan Walsh ___________________________________ Professor of Geography Geography Department ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to recognize Dr. Cheryl Swift and her research team for providing the initial data needed to start my portion of the mapping project. I would also like to say thank you for allowing me the opportunity to work on such a significant project and giving me the background on species diversity calculations. This project would not have been possible without the generous support and efforts of the researchers Chris Haas and Robert Fisher. To my advisor Dan Walsh, I thank you for tolerating my emails, giving me the GIS skills I needed to complete this project and for all the help, direction and guidance you provided. To my dad, thank you for purchasing the software, which made this project feasible and allowed the geographer in me to shine through. For your continued support and inquiry into the progress of my efforts, I would like to acknowledge my brother Nathan and my grandparents. For your help in obtaining WCCA information and the herp proposal, I want to recognize my twin sister, Jennifer.
    [Show full text]
  • Puente Hills Region, Southern California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Hubert Work, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otls Smith, Director Bulletin 768 GEOLOGY AND OIL RESOURCES OF THE PUENTE HILLS REGION, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY WALTER A. ENGLISH WITH A SECTION ON THE CHEMICAL CHARACTER OF THE OIL BY PAUL W. PRUTZMAN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1926 * ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 40 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS Page. "Introduction. _ _ _ _ _ ___ ______ 1 Area covered _ . 1 Purpose and scope of examination___________________ 1 Character and methods of field work__________________ 3 Acknowledgments _______ _,, 4 Geography __________________________________ 5 Definitions of geographic names_____________________ 5 Topography and drainage-____ _ _ _..___ 6 Climate _ _ _______ _____.___ _ _ 8 Natural vegetation__________________._______ ___ 8 Culture ____ __ 9- Previous publications______________________________ 10 Geology- 11 Stratigraphy _____________________ _ 11 General character of formations______ _ 11 Conditions of Tertiary deposition_________________ 14 Triassic slate and associated formations________ ___ 15 Trabuco formation (Cretaceous)__________________ 17 Chico formation (Upper Cretaceous)____________ ___ 18 Martinez formation (lower Eocene) __ 19 Tejon formation (upper Eocene)__________ __ __ 21 Sespe and Vaqueros formations (Oligocene? and lower Mio­ cene) _________________________________ 23 Topanga formation (middle Miocene) _ ___ _ 24 Puente formation (middle and upper Miocene)__ ___ ___ 26 General character _ ____ _ j._____ 26 Lower shale 33 Middle sandstone_________________________ 34 Upper member 36 Age ____ ___ _______ _____ 39 Evidence of oil in Puente formation______________ 39 Fernando group undifferentiated (Pliocene) 39 San Pedro (?) formation (Pleistocene)_______ _ _______ 44 Terrace deposits .
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego County Riverside County Orange County
    Chino Creek Middle Santa Ana River San Timoteo Wash Middle Santa Ana River Little Morongo Creek-Morongo Wash San Gabriel River 18070106 San Gorgonio River Headwaters Whitewater River Lower Santa Ana River Middle San Jacinto River Santa Ana River 18070203 Upper Whitewater River Temescal Wash Santiago Creek San Jacinto River 18070202 Whitewater River 18100201 San Diego Creek Lower San Jacinto River Upper San Jacinto River Newport Bay 18070204 Palm Canyon Wash O r a n g e C o u n t y RR ii vv ee rr ss ii dd ee CC oo uu nn tt yy Middle Whitewater River O r a n g e C o u n t y Middle San Jacinto River Newport Bay-Frontal Pacific Ocean San Jacinto River Deep Canyon Newport Bay-Frontal Pacific Ocean San Juan Creek Murrieta Creek Aliso Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Aliso Creek-San Onofre Creek 18070301 Wilson Creek Lower Whitewater River San Mateo Creek Santa Margarita River 18070302 Aliso Creek-San Onofre Creek Santa Margarita River Lower Temecula Creek Aliso Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Salton Sea 18100204 Santa Margarita River Upper Temecula Creek Coyote Creek Clark Valley San Felipe Creek San Onofre Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Camp Pendleton Bank Property Middle San Luis Rey River Upper San Luis Rey River Lower San Luis Rey River Escondido Creek-San Luis Rey River San Felipe Creek 18100203 Escondido Creek-San Luis Rey River 18070303 Borrego Valley-Borrego Sink Wash Escondido Creek San Marcos Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Upper Santa Ysabel Creek 8-digit HUC Upper San Felipe Creek Sevice Areas Lower Santa Ysabel
    [Show full text]
  • From Rock, Wind, & Water
    FROM ROCK, WIND, & WATER: A N ATURAL H ISTORY OF THE P UENTE H ILLS Richard H. Ross Doctoral Student in History Claremont Graduate University Claremont, CA 91711 Photo: USGS National Elevation Dataset (SDDS). Cover Design: Tomomi Ishihara. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................. 1 List of Illustrations ..................................................................................................... 2 From Rock, Wind, and Water: Introduction ............................................................ 3 Part 1: Of Rock Introduction: Geology ................................................................................................ 4 Plate Tectonics Overview .......................................................................................... 7 First Rocks and Farallon ............................................................................................. 9 Second Rocks and Rotation ..................................................................................... 11 Third Rocks and Uplift ............................................................................................. 13 Conclusion: Geology ................................................................................................ 17 Part 2: Of Wind and Water Introduction: Climate and Erosion ........................................................................... 18 Climate: Mediterranean ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]