DOCSLIB.ORG

Immigration and Asylum Chamber)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) AB and Others (internet activity – state of evidence) Iran [2015] UKUT 0257 (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 28 January 2014, 29 January 2014, 30 On 19 March 2015 January 2014 and 31 January 2014 Re-Promulgated on 30 April 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WARR UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PERKINS Between AB CD EF Appellants and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent Representation: For the Appellants: AB Mr P Haywood, Counsel instructed by Duncan Lewis Solicitors CD Mr T Hodson, Counsel acting for Elder Rahimi Solicitors EF Ms S Harrison, Solicitor from Halliday Reeves For the Respondent: Mr B Rawat, Counsel instructed by the Treasury Solicitors The material put before the tribunal did not disclose a sufficient evidential basis for giving country or other guidance upon what, reliably, can be expected in terms of the reception in Iran for those returning otherwise than with a “regular” passport in relation to whom interest may be excited from the authorities into internet activity as might be revealed by an examination of blogging activity or a Facebook account. However, this determination is reported so that the evidence considered by the Upper Tribunal is available in the public domain. © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2015 DETERMINATION AND REASONS 1. The appellants in this case are citizens of Iran. In very broad terms they each claim they are refugees because of their “blogging” activity on the internet. The word “blogging” will be readily understood by a contemporary reader but for the avoidance of any possible misunderstanding we mean the practice of publishing on the internet written articles, reports, film clips, pictures, or links to the same, whether produced by the person responsible for the blog or another. They each appeal against decisions of the Secretary of State on the grounds that they are refugees or otherwise entitled to international protection. 2. Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 we make an order prohibiting the disclosure or publication of any matter likely to lead members of the public to identify any or all of the appellants. Their cases depend in part on their risking persecution because of things that they have done since leaving Iran, including criticising the government of Iran. The significance of their activities is disputed by the respondent. Publicity that identified them to the Iranian authorities might lead to the absurd result of their needing protection solely because an otherwise unfounded claim for asylum had attracted attention. Breach of this order can be punished as a contempt of court. Although the order must be followed strictly it is not intended to stifle reporting of the issues in the case and our findings on them. 3. As well as determining the three separate appeals that are before us we have endeavoured to give general guidance on a range of related issues. In an effort to make our decision easier to read we do not consider below each strand of evidence or argument in the order in which we heard it. For similar reasons we identify the appellants by their initials rather than their place in the title. 4. We confirm that we have considered all of the several volumes of evidence before us even though we do not mention each document or submission specifically. We reached no conclusion before considering the evidence as a whole. We have decided each appeal on its own merits and we have reminded ourselves that although the appellant in each case must prove his or her case the standard of proof is low. It is sufficient to show only a real risk of persecution or other serious ill treatment in the event of return to Iran to qualify for protection. 5. The appellant, AB, was born in 1989. He appeals a decision of the respondent on 25 March 2011 to remove him as an illegal entrant. He entered the United Kingdom on 3 March 2011. 6. His appeal was dismissed by the First-tier Tribunal in a decision dated 11 May 2011. He appealed to the Upper Tribunal which found that the First-tier Tribunal had erred in law and made fresh findings of fact. The Upper Tribunal dismissed the appeal on 20 August 2012 but the appeal comes before us pursuant to an order of the Court of Appeal on 27 June 2013. The Court of Appeal ordered by consent that the appeal be remitted to this Tribunal to be decided again with the other appeals determined here, on a particular basis. This was explained at paragraph 1 of the consent order dated 27 June 2013 where the Court said: 2 “The Appellant’s appeal be allowed by remittal of the limited grounds of appeal on which permission was granted by Sir Richard Buxton in his Court Order of 7 February 2013 (identified in sub-paragraph 2 of the “Events in the UK” paragraph, relating to the blogging in the UK) to the Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber for reconsideration pursuant to paragraph 12 of Schedule 4 to the Transfer of Functions of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Order 2010 (SI 2010/21) and section 14 of the Tribunal, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007”. 7. The appellant, CD, was born in 1975 and so is now 39 years old. She appeals a decision of the respondent of 25 March 2011 to refuse to vary her leave to remain in the United Kingdom. She arrived in the United Kingdom in September 2010 with permission to enter as a student and claimed asylum on 4 March 2011. Her appeal was dismissed by the First-tier Tribunal but permission to appeal was given by Upper Tribunal Judge Gleeson because she found it arguable that insufficient weight had been given to the appellant’s blogging activities, the expert evidence on which she relied about how bloggers might be identified and treated in Iran and her political activities. 8. Before us there was little argument on the point and we are satisfied that the First-tier Tribunal erred in law for the reasons identified by Judge Gleeson as arguable. The First-tier Tribunal did not engage adequately with the background and expert evidence presented to it. We therefore set aside its determination and decide the appeal again ourselves. 9. The appellant, EF, was born in 1972. He appealed a decision of the respondent on 22 November 2011 to remove him from the United Kingdom. His appeal against that decision was dismissed by the First-tier Tribunal but the Upper Tribunal, in a determination promulgated on 12 May 2013, found that the First- tier Tribunal had erred in law and set aside the decision in that case. Although the reasons have already been sent to the parties we formally incorporate the decision into this determination and set it out at Appendix 3. 10. These cases raise common questions and the parties had suggested a “list of issues” to be determined in the appeal which the Tribunal agreed to adopt. We set these out below: List of Issues (1) The use of social and other internet-based media (including the posting of articles, comments or web links on a website; maintaining or contributing to a blog; uploading/streaming photographs or videos; the use of Facebook by Iranian nationals located in the United Kingdom to make actual or perceived criticisms of the Iranian state) (2) Whether such use is reasonably likely to come to the attention of the Iranian authorities because those authorities have the capability to detect and monitor such activity (a) the capability of the Iranian authorities to monitor and/or restrict the use within Iran social and/or other internet-based media; (b) the capability of the Iranian authorities to identify individuals in Iran who use (as in (1)), above, social and/or other internet-based media in a way that is critical or perceived as being critical of the Iranian authorities; 3 (c) the capability of the Iranian authorities to monitor the use social and other internet-based media by Iranian nationals based outside of Iran; (d) the capability of the Iranian authorities to identify Iranian nationals based outside Iran who make use of social and/or other internet-based media to criticise the Iranian government and/or express views which are likely to be considered critical of the Iranian state; (e) the level of public interest within Iran in views posted on social or other internet-based media by Iranian nationals living in the United Kingdom and which may be considered critical of the Iranian state; (f) the capability of the Iranian authorities to restrict access to social/internet-based media operated by Iranians in the United Kingdom and is critical or deemed to be critical of the Iranian state. (3) The additional factors that may be relevant to an assessment of the risk on return to an Iranian national who, while in the United Kingdom, has used social and/or other internet-based media to express views that are, or are deemed by the Iranian authorities to be critical of the Iranian state, including: (a) the use of social and/or other internet-based media, prior to departure from Iran, in a manner considered to be critical of the Iranian state; (b) the nature of any “profile” with the authorities that the returnee might have had before leaving Iran; (c) other “sur place” activities in the UK; (d) the immigration history of the returnee, including whether the returnee has left Iran illegally; (e) the possession of a laptop and/or other equipment that may be used across the internet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iran Human Rights Defenders Report 2019/20
    IRAN HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS REPORT 2019/20 Table of Contents Definition of terms and concepts 4 Introduction 7 LAWYERS Amirsalar Davoudi 9 Payam Derafshan 10 Mohammad Najafi 11 Nasrin Sotoudeh 12 CIVIL ACTIVISTS Zartosht Ahmadi-Ragheb 13 Rezvaneh Ahmad-Khanbeigi 14 Shahnaz Akmali 15 Atena Daemi 16 Golrokh Ebrahimi-Irayi 17 Farhad Meysami 18 Narges Mohammadi 19 Mohammad Nourizad 20 Arsham Rezaii 21 Arash Sadeghi 22 Saeed Shirzad 23 Imam Ali Popular Student Relief Society 24 TEACHERS Esmaeil Abdi 26 Mahmoud Beheshti-Langroudi 27 Mohammad Habibi 28 MINORITY RIGHTS ACTIVISTS Mary Mohammadi 29 Zara Mohammadi 30 ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISTS Persian Wildlife Heritage Foundation 31 Workers rights ACTIVISTS Marzieh Amiri 32 This report has been prepared by Iran Human Rights (IHR) Esmaeil Bakhshi 33 Sepideh Gholiyan 34 Leila Hosseinzadeh 35 IHR is an independent non-partisan NGO based in Norway. Abolition of the Nasrin Javadi 36 death penalty, supporting human rights defenders and promoting the rule of law Asal Mohammadi 37 constitute the core of IHR’s activities. Neda Naji 38 Atefeh Rangriz 39 Design and layout: L Tarighi Hassan Saeedi 40 © Iran Human Rights, 2020 Rasoul Taleb-Moghaddam 41 WOMEN’S RIGHTS ACTIVISTS Raha Ahmadi 42 Raheleh Ahmadi 43 Monireh Arabshahi 44 Yasaman Aryani 45 Mojgan Keshavarz 46 Saba Kordafshari 47 Nedaye Zanan Iran 48 www.iranhr.net Recommendations 49 Endnotes 50 : @IHRights | : @iranhumanrights | : @humanrightsiran Definition of Terms & Concepts PRISONS Evin Prison: Iran’s most notorious prison where Wards 209, 240 and 241, which have solitary cells called security“suites” and are controlled by the Ministry of Intelligence (MOIS): Ward 209 Evin: dedicated to security prisoners under the jurisdiction of the MOIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran Adopted: 24 October 1979 Effective: 3 December 1979 Amended: 28 July 1989
    Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran Adopted: 24 October 1979 Effective: 3 December 1979 Amended: 28 July 1989 Preamble The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran advances the cultural, social, political, and economic institutions of Iranian society based on Islamic principles and norms, which represent an honest aspiration of the Islamic Ummah [community]. This aspiration was exemplified by the nature of the great Islamic Revolution of Iran, and by the course of the Muslim people's struggle, from its beginning until victory, as reflected in the decisive and forceful calls raised by all segments of the populations. Now, at the threshold of this great victory, our nation, with all its beings, seeks its fulfillment. The basic characteristic of this revolution, which distinguishes it from other movements that have taken place in Iran during the past hundred years, is its ideological and Islamic nature. After experiencing the anti-despotic constitutional movement and the anti-colonialist movement centered on the nationalization of the oil industry, the Muslim people of Iran learned from this costly experience that the obvious and fundamental reason for the failure of those movements was their lack of an ideological basis. Although the Islamic line of thought and the direction provided by militant religious leaders played an essential role in the recent movements, nonetheless, the struggles waged in the course of those movements quickly fell into stagnation due to departure from genuine Islamic positions. Thus it was that the awakened conscience of the nation, under the leadership of Imam Khumayni [Khomeini], came to perceive the necessity of pursuing a genuinely Islamic and ideological line in its struggles.
    [Show full text]
  • PROTESTS and REGIME SUPPRESSION in POST-REVOLUTIONARY IRAN Saeid Golkar
    THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY n OCTOBER 2020 n PN85 PROTESTS AND REGIME SUPPRESSION IN POST-REVOLUTIONARY IRAN Saeid Golkar Green Movement members tangle with Basij and police forces, 2009. he nationwide protests that engulfed Iran in late 2019 were ostensibly a response to a 50 percent gasoline price hike enacted by the administration of President Hassan Rouhani.1 But in little time, complaints Textended to a broader critique of the leadership. Moreover, beyond the specific reasons for the protests, they appeared to reveal a deeper reality about Iran, both before and since the 1979 emergence of the Islamic Republic: its character as an inherently “revolutionary country” and a “movement society.”2 Since its formation, the Islamic Republic has seen multiple cycles of protest and revolt, ranging from ethnic movements in the early 1980s to urban riots in the early 1990s, student unrest spanning 1999–2003, the Green Movement response to the 2009 election, and upheaval in December 2017–January 2018. The last of these instances, like the current round, began with a focus on economic dissatisfaction and then spread to broader issues. All these movements were put down by the regime with characteristic brutality. © 2020 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. SAEID GOLKAR In tracking and comparing protest dynamics and market deregulation, currency devaluation, and the regime responses since 1979, this study reveals that cutting of subsidies. These policies, however, spurred unrest has become more significant in scale, as well massive inflation, greater inequality, and a spate of as more secularized and violent.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East 1 Middle East
    Middle East 1 Middle East Middle East Map of the Middle east. (Green color) Countries 18–38 (varying definitions) Languages Middle East: Arabic, Aramaic, Azerbaijani, French, Greek, Hebrew, Kurdish, Persian, Somali, Turkish Greater Middle East: Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Balochi, Berber, Dari, French, Greek, Georgian, Hebrew, Kurdish, Pashto, Persian, Somali, Tigrinya, Turkish, Urdu Time Zones UTC +3:30 (Iran) to UTC +2:00 (Egypt) (traditional definition) Largest Cities In rank order: Istanbul, Cairo, Tehran, Baghdad, Riyadh, Jeddah, Ankara The Middle East[1] is a region that roughly encompasses Western Asia. The term is considered to be Eurocentric and used as a synonym for Near East, in opposition to Far East. The corresponding adjective is Middle-Eastern and the derived noun is Middle-Easterner. The largest ethnic group in the middle east are Arabs,[2] with Turks, Turkomans, Persians, Kurds, Azeris, Copts, Jews, Maronites, Assyro-Chaldeans, Circassians, Armenians, Druze and numerous other ethnic groups forming other significant populations. The history of the Middle East dates back to ancient times, and throughout its history, the Middle East has been a major center of world affairs. When discussing ancient history, however, the term Near East is more commonly used. The Middle East is also the historical origin of major religions such as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as well as the less common Baha'i faith, Mandaeism, Druze faith and others. The Middle East generally has an arid and hot climate, with several major rivers providing for irrigation to support agriculture in limited areas, especially in Mesopotamia and the rest of the Fertile Crescent. Many countries located around the Persian Gulf have large quantities of crude oil, which has resulted in much wealth particularly for nations in the Arabian peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Liechtensteinisches Landesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2013 Nr
    946.223.3 Liechtensteinisches Landesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2013 Nr. 143 ausgegeben am 25. März 2013 Verordnung vom 20. März 2013 betreffend die Abänderung der Verordnung über Massnahmen gegenüber der Islamischen Republik Iran Aufgrund von Art. 2 des Gesetzes vom 10. Dezember 2008 über die Durchsetzung internationaler Sanktionen (ISG), LGBl. 2009 Nr. 41, unter Einbezug der aufgrund des Zollvertrages anwendbaren schweizeri- schen Rechtsvorschriften und der Beschlüsse des Rates der Europäischen Union vom 26. Juli 2010 (2010/413/GASP), vom 12. April 2011 (2011/235/GASP), vom 23. Mai 2011 (2011/299/GASP), vom 10. Oktober 2011 (2011/670/GASP), vom 1. Dezember 2011 (2011/783/GASP), vom 23. Januar 2012 (2012/35/GASP), vom 15. März 2012 (2012/152/GASP), vom 23. März 2012 (2012/168/GASP), vom 23. April 2012 (2012/205/GASP), vom 2. August 2012 (2012/457/GASP), vom 15. Oktober 2012 (2012/635/GASP), vom 21. Dezember 2012 (2012/829/GASP) und vom 11. März 2013 (2013/124/GASP) sowie in Ausführung der Resolutionen 1737 (2006) vom 23. Dezember 2006, 1747 (2007) vom 24. März 2007, 1803 (2008) vom 3. März 2008 und 1929 (2010) vom 9. Juni 2010 des Si- cherheitsrates der Vereinten Nationen verordnet die Regierung: I. Abänderung bisherigen Rechts Die Verordnung vom 1. Februar 2011 über Massnahmen gegenüber der Islamischen Republik Iran, LGBl. 2011 Nr. 55, in der geltenden Fas- sung, wird wie folgt abgeändert: 2 Anhang 6 Bst. A Überschrift vor Ziff. 1, Überschrift nach Ziff. 326 sowie Ziff. 1 A. Unternehmen und Organisationen a) Beschluss 2010/413/GASP … b) Beschluss 2011/235/GASP Name Identifizierungsinformation 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lions and Roses: an Interpretive History of Israeli-Iranian Relations" (2007)
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-13-2007 Lions and Roses: An Interpretive History of Israeli- Iranian Relations Marsha B. Cohen Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI08081510 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Cohen, Marsha B., "Lions and Roses: An Interpretive History of Israeli-Iranian Relations" (2007). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/5 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida LIONS AND ROSES: AN INTERPRETIVE HISTORY OF ISRAELI-IRANIAN RELATIONS A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS by Marsha B. Cohen 2007 To: Interim Dean Mark Szuchman College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Marsha B. Cohen, and entitled Lions and Roses: An Interpretive History of Israeli-Iranian Relations, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Flags and Banners
    Flags and Banners A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton Contents 1 Flag 1 1.1 History ................................................. 2 1.2 National flags ............................................. 4 1.2.1 Civil flags ........................................... 8 1.2.2 War flags ........................................... 8 1.2.3 International flags ....................................... 8 1.3 At sea ................................................. 8 1.4 Shapes and designs .......................................... 9 1.4.1 Vertical flags ......................................... 12 1.5 Religious flags ............................................. 13 1.6 Linguistic flags ............................................. 13 1.7 In sports ................................................ 16 1.8 Diplomatic flags ............................................ 18 1.9 In politics ............................................... 18 1.10 Vehicle flags .............................................. 18 1.11 Swimming flags ............................................ 19 1.12 Railway flags .............................................. 20 1.13 Flagpoles ............................................... 21 1.13.1 Record heights ........................................ 21 1.13.2 Design ............................................. 21 1.14 Hoisting the flag ............................................ 21 1.15 Flags and communication ....................................... 21 1.16 Flapping ................................................ 23 1.17 See also ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, the Second Largest Nation in the Middle East, Has a Population of More Than 80 Million, of Which (On Paper at Least) 99% Are Identified As Muslim
    Iran Iran, the second largest nation in the Middle East, has a population of more than 80 million, of which (on paper at least) 99% are identified as Muslim. The Muslim majority includes a Shia majority (90%) and 9% Sunni Muslims (Turkmen, Arabs, Baluchis and Kurds). The remaining 1% of non-Muslim population are identified as Baha’is, Christians, Jews, Sabean-Mandaeans, Zoroastrians, and Yarsanis. A considerable part of the Muslim population practice Sufism. Iran experienced a far-reaching Islamization of law and society after the Islamic revolution in 1979. Hassan Rouhani has been the president since 2013. Constitution and Education and Family, Freedom of government children’s rights community, expression society, religious advocacy of courts and humanist values tribunals Religious Expression of non- Expression of core authorities have religious views is Humanist supreme authority severely principles on over the state persecuted, or is democracy, State legislation is rendered almost freedom and largely or entirely impossible by human rights is derived from severe social brutally repressed religious law or by stigma, or is ‘Apostasy’ or religious highly likely to be conversion from a authorities met with hatred or specific religion is The non-religious violence outlawed and are barred from Government punishable by holding figures or state death government office agencies openly ‘Blasphemy’ or marginalize, criticism of harass, or incite religion is hatred or violence outlawed and against the non- punishable by religious death It is illegal
    [Show full text]
  • The Vexilloid Tabloid #21, April 2009
    Portland Flag Association Publication 1 Portland Flag Association “Free, and Worth Every Penny!” Issue 21 April 2009 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: The Sun in Flags The Sun in Flags 1 By Robert Stephens Portugal’s flag where one can see a The independence revealed in shield sitting on top of a circle. The 2 Flag Related Websites flags has a universal representa- circle behind Portugal’s coat of Remembering Doug Lynch 3 tion that shows us that a group arms is actually a shape represent- has the right of sovereignty. The ing an astronomical device called an Next Meeting Announcement 4 general symbolisms of the 192 armillary sphere. The armillary Inauguration Flags 4 flags of United Nation member states are linked through astro- April 2009 Flutterings 5 logical representation. Of the as- The Flag Quiz 7 trological symbols shown in flags there are three classifications: planets, moons and stars. The star is the most common symbol in flags, a characteristic that is con- fusing in its representation. I have Portugal classified the image of stars on sphere has the earth at its center in flags into the four categories of order to track the Sun in relation to constellations, asterisms, clusters the earth. The entire armillary and specific stars. A specific star, sphere is actually a symbol of the such as the Sun, is a mystery on Sun, a sign of wisdom and knowl- flags due to its indirect represen- edge. tation leading to a discussion of what its true meaning is. The Sun Another example of a hidden image on flags is a symbol that has dif- of the Sun would be Iran’s flag.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran Page 1 of 36
    UNHCR | Refworld | Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran Page 1 of 36 Title Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran Publisher National Legislative Bodies Country Islamic Republic of Iran Publication Date 24 October 1979 Reference IRN-010 Cite as Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran [Islamic Republic of Iran], 24 October 1979, available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b56710.html [accessed 12 January 2012] Comments This is the official translation. The 1989 Amendment was approved by the government on 8 July 1989 and submitted to a referendum on 28 July 1989 for 'ratification by the nation'. Disclaimer This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher. Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful We sent aforetime Our apostles with clear signs, and sent down with them the Book and the Balance that men may uphold justice .... (57:25) PREAMBLE The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran sets forth the cultural, social, political, and economic institutions of Iranian society on the basis of Islamic principles and norms, which represent the earnest aspiration of the Islamic Ummah. This basic aspiration was made explicit by the very nature of the great Islamic Revolution of Iran, as well as the course of the Muslim people's struggle, from its beginning until victory, as reflected in the decisive and forceful slogans raised by all segments of the populations. Now, at the threshold of this great victory, our nation, with all its being, seeks its fulfillment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical, Legal and Political Dimensions of Iran`S Sovereignty Over the Tunbs and Abu Musa Islands
    J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 3(11)347-352, 2013 ISSN 2090-4304 © 2013, TextRoad Publication Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research www.textroad.com The Historical, Legal and Political Dimensions of Iran`s Sovereignty Over the Tunbs and Abu Musa Islands Mirtayyeb Mussavi1, Aryanaz Sadat Mussavi2, Ahmad Bakhshayeshi3 1Ph D in political science, Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Political Sciences, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University. 2MA student, University of Tehran Kish International Campus 3Ph D full professor, Tehran University Received: September 19 2013 Accepted: October 22 2013 ABSTRACT The seven islands, Abu Musa, Tunb-e- Bozorg, Tunb - e- Koochak, Hengam, Qeshm, Larak and Hormuz as “a hypothetical arch, form a chain-like strategic line of Iran”. From the early 18th century some European countries, tried to dominate on Strait of Hormuz, and southern rim of the Persian Gulf. Great Britain imposed its guardianship system, by taking appropriate policy and exercising military power. In January 1968, Britain announced its decision to withdraw from Persian Gulf in 1971 and constituting a federation consist of Bahrain, Qatar and Trucial Emirates. Iran knowing itself the owner of Bahrain, could get back the Tunbs and Abu Musa islands , in return for recognizing independence of Bahrain and constituting of United Arab Emirates. Iraq, Libya, South Yemen and the UAE complained against Iran to the UNSC. By recommendation of an Arab country, the SC terminated the subject, so Iran’s sovereignty is taking proceeding so long, and its ownership is certain. KEY WORDS: Persian Gulf, Tunbs and Abu Musa Islands, Iran, UAE INTRODUCTION In 2005, the National Geographic Society and in 2012, the Google site, published fictitious names for Persian Gulf and some Iranian islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran 2012 Human Rights Report
    IRAN 2012 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is a theocratic republic established after the 1979 adoption of a constitution by popular referendum. The constitution, amended in 1989, created a political system based on the concept in Shia Islam of velayat-e faqih, the “guardianship of the jurist” or “rule by the jurisprudent.” Shia clergy and political leaders vetted by the clergy, many of which are increasingly associated with the country’s security forces, dominate key power structures. The “leader of the revolution” (or supreme leader) is chosen by a popularly elected body of 86 clerics, the Assembly of Experts, and directly controls the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government, as well as the armed forces. The supreme leader also indirectly controls internal security forces and other key institutions. Since 1989 the supreme leader has been Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The March 2 legislative elections for the 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly were generally considered neither free nor fair. Civilian authorities failed at times to maintain effective control over the security forces. The government continued its crackdown on civil society, which intensified after the disputed 2009 presidential elections. The government and its security forces pressured, intimidated, and arrested journalists, students, lawyers, artists, women, ethnic and religious activists, and members of their families. The judiciary continued to harshly punish, imprison, or detain without charges human rights activists, members of the political opposition, and persons linked to reform movements. The government significantly increased its surveillance and monitoring of citizens’ online activities by blocking or filtering content and detaining numerous Internet users for content posted online.
    [Show full text]