4260 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., will also post a report summarizing each Washington, DC 20590. substantive verbal contact we receive Federal Aviation Administration • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of about this proposed AD. Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 14 CFR Part 39 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room Discussion W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., [Docket No. FAA–2011–0030; Directorate On February 6, 2007, we issued AD Identifier 2009–NM–183–AD] Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 2007–04–11, Amendment 39–14943 (72 p.m., Monday through Friday, except FR 8604, February 27, 2007). That AD RIN 2120–AA64 Federal holidays. required actions intended to address an For service information identified in unsafe condition on Model A300 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS— B2 and B4 series airplanes. A300 and A310 Series Airplanes, and EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4– Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac On September 19, 2007, we issued AD 600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4– Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 2007–20–03, Amendment 39–15213 (72 605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail FR 54536, September 26, 2007). That Called A300–600 Series Airplanes) [email protected]; AD required actions intended to address Internet http://www.airbus.com. You an unsafe condition on Airbus Model AGENCY: Federal Aviation may review copies of the referenced A300–600 series airplanes. Administration (FAA), DOT. service information at the FAA, On November 23, 2007, we issued AD ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 2007–25–02, Amendment 39–15283 (72 (NPRM). Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. FR 69612, December 10, 2007). That AD required actions intended to address an SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new For information on the availability of unsafe condition on Airbus Model A310 airworthiness directive (AD) for the this material at the FAA, call 425–227– series airplanes. products listed above that would 1221. supersede three existing ADs. This Examining the AD Docket Since we issued ADs 2007–04–11, proposed AD results from mandatory 2007–20–03, and 2007–25–02, we have You may examine the AD docket on continuing airworthiness information determined that the airworthiness the Internet at http:// (MCAI) originated by an aviation limitations for these airplanes must be www.regulations.gov; or in person at the authority of another country to identify updated in order to adequately address Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and correct an unsafe condition on an the unsafe condition. The European and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, aviation product. The MCAI describes Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which except Federal holidays. The AD docket the unsafe condition as: is the Technical Agent for the Member contains this proposed AD, the States of the European Community, has The airworthiness limitations applicable to regulatory evaluation, any comments the Damage Tolerant Airworthiness issued EASA Airworthiness Directive received, and other information. The 2009–0155, dated July 17, 2009 (referred Limitation Items (DT ALI) are currently listed street address for the Docket Operations in Airbus ALI Documents, which are to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct referenced in the A300, A310, and A300–600 office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in an unsafe condition for the specified Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part the ADDRESSES section. Comments will products. The MCAI states: 2. Airbus has recently revised the ALI be available in the AD docket shortly Documents, which have been approved by after receipt. The airworthiness limitations applicable to the Damage Tolerant Airworthiness the European Aviation Safety Agency FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Limitation Items (DT ALI) are currently listed (EASA). Rodina, Engineer, in Airbus ALI Documents, which are * * * * * International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, referenced in the A300, A310, and A300–600 The actions contained in these revised Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 documents, which introduce more restrictive Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 2. Airbus has recently revised the ALI maintenance requirements and/or 98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2125; airworthiness limitations, have been Documents, which have been approved by identified as mandatory actions for continued fax (425) 227–1149. the European Aviation Safety Agency airworthiness. * * * SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (EASA). The unsafe condition is fatigue cracking, Comments Invited — ALI Document issue 04. damage, or corrosion in principal —Airbus A310 ALI Document issue 07 and We invite you to send any written —Airbus A300–600 ALI Document issue 12 structural elements, which could result relevant data, views, or arguments about The actions contained in these revised in reduced structural integrity of the this proposed AD. Send your comments airplane. The proposed AD would documents, which introduce more restrictive to an address listed under the maintenance requirements and/or require actions that are intended to ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. airworthiness limitations, have been address the unsafe condition described FAA–2011–0030; Directorate Identifier in the MCAI. identified as mandatory actions for continued 2009–NM–183–AD’’ at the beginning of airworthiness. EASA issued ADs 2006–0071, DATES: We must receive comments on your comments. We specifically invite 2006–0260, and 2006–0374 [which this proposed AD by March 11, 2011. comments on the overall regulatory, correspond to FAA ADs 2007–04–11, 2007– ADDRESSES: You may send comments by economic, environmental, and energy 25–02, and 2007–20–03] to require any of the following methods: aspects of this proposed AD. We will compliance with the maintenance • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to consider all comments received by the requirements and associated airworthiness http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the closing date and may amend this limitations defined in previous issues of instructions for submitting comments. proposed AD based on those comments. these Airbus ALI documents. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. We will post all comments we For the reason described above, [the] EASA • Mail: U.S. Department of receive, without change, to http:// AD supersedes existing ADs 2006–0071, Transportation, Docket Operations, M– www.regulations.gov, including any 2006–0260, and 2006–0374 and requires an 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room personal information you provide. We update to the approved aircraft maintenance

VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:06 Jan 24, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM 25JAP1 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules 4261

programme and compliance with the Costs of Compliance on a substantial number of small entities maintenance requirements and associated Based on the service information, we under the criteria of the Regulatory airworthiness limitations defined in the estimate that this proposed AD would Flexibility Act. Airbus ALI Documents listed above. We prepared a regulatory evaluation affect about 206 products of U.S. of the estimated costs to comply with registry. The unsafe condition is fatigue cracking, this proposed AD and placed it in the The actions that are required by AD damage, or corrosion in principal AD docket. structural elements, which could result 2007–04–11, AD 2007–20–03, and AD in reduced structural integrity of the 2007–25–02, and retained in this List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 airplane. The required actions include proposed AD, take about 1 work hour Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation revising the Airworthiness Limitations per product. The average labor rate is safety, Incorporation by reference, section of the Instructions for Continued $85 per work-hour. Based on these Safety. Airworthiness to incorporate new and figures, we estimate the cost of those revised structural inspections and actions on U.S. operators to be $85 per The Proposed Amendment inspection intervals. You may obtain product. Accordingly, under the authority further information by examining the We estimate that it would take about delegated to me by the Administrator, MCAI in the AD docket. 1 work-hour per product to comply with the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part the new requirements of this proposed 39 as follows: Relevant Service Information AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Airbus has issued A300–600 estimate the cost of the proposed AD on DIRECTIVES Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI) U.S. operators to be $17,510, or $85 per 1. The authority citation for part 39 Document AI/SE–M2/95A.1310/07, product. Issue 12, dated June 2008; A300 ALI continues to read as follows: Document AI/SE–M2/95A.1308/07, Authority for This Rulemaking Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Issue 4, dated June 2008; and A310 ALI Title 49 of the United States Code § 39.13 [Amended] Document, AI/SE–M2/95A.1309/07, specifies the FAA’s authority to issue Issue 7, dated June 2008. The actions rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by described in this service information are section 106, describes the authority of removing Amendment 39–14943 (72 FR intended to correct the unsafe condition the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 8604, February 27, 2007); Amendment identified in the MCAI. Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 39–15213 (72 FR 54536, September 26, detail the scope of the Agency’s 2007); and Amendment 39–15283 (72 FAA’s Determination and Requirements FR 69612, December 10, 2007); and of This Proposed AD authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under adding the following new AD: This product has been approved by the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2011–0030; the aviation authority of another Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–183–AD. country, and is approved for operation General requirements.’’ Under that Comments Due Date in the United States. Pursuant to our section, Congress charges the FAA with (a) We must receive comments by March bilateral agreement with the State of promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 11, 2011. Design Authority, we have been notified air commerce by prescribing regulations Affected ADs of the unsafe condition described in the for practices, methods, and procedures MCAI and service information the Administrator finds necessary for (b) This AD supersedes AD 2007–04–11, referenced above. We are proposing this safety in air commerce. This regulation Amendment 39–14943; AD 2007–20–03, is within the scope of that authority Amendment 39–15213; and AD 2007–25–02, AD because we evaluated all pertinent Amendment 39–15283. information and determined an unsafe because it addresses an unsafe condition condition exists and is likely to exist or that is likely to exist or develop on Applicability develop on other products of the same products identified in this rulemaking (c) This AD applies to all Airbus model type design. action. airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD, certificated in Differences Between This AD and the Regulatory Findings any category. MCAI or Service Information We determined that this proposed AD (1) Model A300 B2–1A, B2–1C, B4–2C, would not have federalism implications B2K–3C, B4–103, B2–203, and B4–203 We have reviewed the MCAI and under Executive Order 13132. This airplanes. (2) Model A310–203, –204, –221, –222, related service information and, in proposed AD would not have a general, agree with their substance. But –304, –322, –324, and –325 airplanes. substantial direct effect on the States, on (3) Models A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, we might have found it necessary to use the relationship between the national different words from those in the MCAI B4–622, B4–605R, B4–622R, F4–605R, and Government and the States, or on the F4–622R airplanes, and Model A300 C4– to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. distribution of power and 605R Variant F airplanes. operators and is enforceable. In making responsibilities among the various Note 1: This AD requires revisions to these changes, we do not intend to differ levels of government. certain operator maintenance documents to substantively from the information For the reasons discussed above, I include new inspections. Compliance with provided in the MCAI and related certify this proposed regulation: these inspections is required by 14 CFR service information. 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 91.403(c). For airplanes that have been We might also have proposed action’’ under Executive Order 12866; previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by these inspections, the different actions in this AD from those 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the operator may not be able to accomplish the in the MCAI in order to follow FAA DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures inspections described in the revisions. In this policies. Any such differences are (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), highlighted in a Note within the 3. Will not have a significant the operator must request approval for an proposed AD. economic impact, positive or negative, alternative method of compliance according

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:39 Jan 24, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM 25JAP1 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS 4262 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules

to paragraph (t)(1) of this AD. The request bulletins identified in Section 6, ‘‘SB No Reporting should include a description of changes to Reference List,’’ Revision 2 of the SSID, and (m) Although Airbus A300 Airworthiness the required inspections that will ensure the a grace period is not specified in that service Limitation Items Document SEM2/95A.1090/ continued damage tolerance of the affected bulletin: Accomplish the actions specified in 05, Issue 3, dated September 2005, specifies structure. The FAA has provided guidance that service bulletin within 1,500 flight to submit certain information to the for this determination in Advisory Circular cycles after August 9, 1996. manufacturer, this AD does not include that (AC) 25–1529–1. Revision of the Maintenance Inspection requirement. Subject Program Restatement of Requirements of AD 2007– (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of (h) For airplanes identified in paragraph 20–03 America Codes 52: Doors; 53: ; 54: (c)(1) of this AD: Within 12 months after Actions and Compliance Nacelles/pylons; 55: Stabilizers; 57: ; April 3, 2007 (the effective date of AD 2007– and 71: Powerplant (for Model A300–600 04–11), replace the revision of the (n) For airplanes identified in paragraph only). maintenance program required by paragraph (c)(3) of this AD: Within 3 months after (g) of this AD with the supplemental October 31, 2007 (the effective date AD Reason structural inspections, inspection intervals, 2007–20–03), revise the ALS of the (e) The mandatory continuing and repairs defined in Airbus A300 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to airworthiness information (MCAI) states: Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI) incorporate Airbus A300–600 Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI) Document AI/SE–M2/ The airworthiness limitations applicable to Document SEM2/95A.1090/05, Issue 3, dated 95A.0502/06, Issue 11, dated April 2006 the Damage Tolerant Airworthiness September 2005, as revised by Airbus A300 (‘‘Issue 11 of the ALI’’). The tolerance (grace Limitation Items (DT ALI) are currently listed Temporary Revision (TR) 3.1, dated April period) for compliance (specified in in Airbus ALI Documents, which are 2006 (‘‘Issue 3 of the ALI’’). Accomplish the paragraph 2 of Section B—Program Rules) referenced in the A300, A310, and A300–600 actions specified in Issue 3 of the ALI at the with Issue 11 of the ALI is within 2,000 flight Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part times specified in that ALI, except as cycles after October 31, 2007, provided that 2. Airbus has recently revised the ALI provided by paragraph (i) of this AD. The none of the following is exceeded. Documents, which have been approved by actions must be accomplished in accordance Accomplishing the initial ALI tasks required the European Aviation Safety Agency with Issue 3 of the ALI. Accomplishing the by paragraph (s) of this AD terminates the (EASA). initial ALI tasks required by paragraph (s) of actions required by this paragraph. this AD terminates the actions required by * * * * * (1) Thresholds or intervals in the operator’s this paragraph. The actions contained in these revised current approved maintenance schedule that (i) For airplanes identified in paragraph documents, which introduce more restrictive are taken from a previous ALI issue, if maintenance requirements and/or (c)(1) of this AD that have exceeded the existing, and are higher than or equal to those airworthiness limitations, have been threshold or intervals specified in the Airbus given in Issue 11 of the ALI. identified as mandatory actions for continued A300 Airworthiness Limitation Items (2) 8 months after October 31, 2007. airworthiness. * * * Document SEM2/95A.1090/05, Issue 3, dated (3) 50 percent of the intervals given in The unsafe condition is fatigue cracking, September 2005 (‘‘Issue 3 of the ALI’’), for Issue 11 of the ALI. damage, or corrosion in principal structural the application tolerance on the first interval (4) Any application tolerance given in the elements, which could result in reduced for new and revised requirements and have task description of Issue 11 of the ALI. structural integrity of the airplane. exceeded 50 percent of the intervals specified in sections D and E of Issue 3 of the ALI: Do Restatement of Requirements of AD 2007– Compliance the actions within 6 months after April 3, 25–02 2007. (f) You are responsible for having the Revision of the Airworthiness Limitations actions required by this AD performed within Corrective Actions Section (ALS) of the Instructions for the compliance times specified, unless the Continued Airworthiness (ICA) actions have already been done. (j) Damaged, cracked, or corroded structure detected during any inspection done in (o) For airplanes identified in paragraph Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD accordance with the Airbus (c)(2) of this AD: Within 3 months after 2007–04–11 A300Airworthiness Limitation Items January 14, 2008 (the effective date of AD (g) Within one year after August 9, 1996 Document SEM2/95A.1090/05, Issue 3, dated 2007–25–02), do the actions specified in (the effective date of AD 96–13–11), replace September 2005 (‘‘Issue 3 of the ALI’’), must paragraphs (o)(1) and (o)(2) of this AD. the revision of the maintenance program with be repaired, before further flight, in Accomplishing the initial ALI tasks required the inspections, inspection intervals, repairs, accordance with Issue 3 of the ALI, except as by paragraph (s) of this AD terminates the and replacements defined in ‘‘Airbus provided by paragraph (k) of this AD; or actions required by this paragraph. Industrie A300 Supplemental Structural other data meeting the certification basis of (1) Revise the ALS of the ICA to Inspection Document’’ (SSID), Revision 2, the airplane which is approved by the incorporate the structural inspections and dated June 1994 (‘‘Revision 2 of the SSID’’). Manager, International Branch, ANM–116; or inspection intervals defined in Airbus A310 Accomplish the actions specified in the by the European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Limitations Items (ALI) service bulletins identified in Section 6, ‘‘SB (EASA) (or its delegated agent). Document, AI/SE–M2/95A.0263/06, Issue 6, Reference List,’’ Revision 2 of the SSID, at the (k) Where the Airbus A300Airworthiness dated April 2006 (approved by the European times specified in those service bulletins. Limitation Items Document SEM2/95A.1090/ Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on May 31, The actions are to be accomplished in 05, Issue 3, dated September 2005, specifies 2006). Accomplish the actions specified in accordance with those service bulletins. contacting Airbus for appropriate action: Issue 6 of the ALI at the times specified in Accomplishing the initial ALI tasks required Before further flight, repair the damaged, that ALI, except as provided by paragraph (p) by paragraph(s) of this AD terminates the cracked, or corroded structure using a of this AD. Thereafter, except as provided by actions required by this paragraph. method approved by either the Manager, paragraphs (o)(2) and (t)(1) of this AD, no (1) For airplanes that have exceeded the International Branch, ANM–116; or the alternative structural inspection intervals threshold specified in any of the service EASA (or its delegated agent). may be approved. The actions specified in bulletins identified in Section 6, ‘‘SB Issue 6 of the ALI must be accomplished in Reference List,’’ Revision 2 of the SSID: No Fleet Sampling accordance with Issue 6 of the ALI. Accomplish the actions specified in those (l) Although Airbus A300 Airworthiness (2) Revise the ALS of the ICA to service bulletins within the grace period Limitation Items Document SEM2/95A.1090/ incorporate the new and revised structural specified in that service bulletin. The grace 05, Issue 3, dated September 2005, specifies inspections and inspection intervals defined period is to be measured from August 9, to do a ‘‘Sampling Concept’’ in section B, this in Airbus Temporary Revision (TR) 6.1, dated 1996. AD prohibits the use of such a sampling November 2006 (approved by the EASA on (2) For airplanes that have exceeded the program and requires all affected airplanes of December 12, 2006), to Issue 6 of the ALI. threshold specified in any of the service the fleet to be inspected. Thereafter, except as provided by paragraph

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:39 Jan 24, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM 25JAP1 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules 4263

(t)(1) of this AD, no alternative structural certification basis of the airplane that has circumstance of detection and inspection inspection intervals may be approved. been approved by either the Manager, method used. International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Exception to Issue 6 of the ALI (1) If the inspection was done after January Airplane Directorate, FAA, or the EASA (or 14, 2008: Submit the report within 30 days (p) The tolerance (grace period) for its delegated agent). Where Issue 6 of the ALI after the inspection. compliance with Airbus A310 Airworthiness specifies to contact Airbus for appropriate (2) If the inspection was accomplished Limitations Items (ALI) Document, AI/SE– action: Before further flight, repair the M2/95A.0263/06, Issue 6, dated April 2006 damaged, cracked, or corroded structure prior to January 14, 2008: Submit the report (‘‘Issue 6 of the ALI’’), is within 1,500 flight using a method approved by either the within 30 days after January 14, 2008. cycles after January 14, 2008, provided that Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, or New Requirements of This AD none of the following is exceeded. the EASA (or its delegated agent). (1) Thresholds or intervals in the operator’s Revision of the ALS of the Instructions for current approved maintenance schedule that Reporting Requirement ICA are taken from a previous ALI issue, if (r) If any damage that exceeds the (s) Within 3 months after the effective date existing, and are higher than or equal to those allowable limits specified in Airbus A310 given in Issue 6 of the ALI. Airworthiness Limitations Items (ALI) of this AD: Revise the ALS of the ICA to (2) 18 months after January 14, 2008. Document, AI/SE–M2/95A.0263/06, Issue 6, incorporate the structural inspections and (3) 50 percent of the intervals given in dated April 2006, is detected during any inspection intervals defined in the applicable Issue 6 of the ALI. inspection required by this AD: At the ALI document listed in Table 1 of this AD. (4) Any application tolerance specified in applicable time specified in paragraph (r)(1) Thereafter, except as provided by paragraph Section D of Issue 6 of the ALI. or (r)(2) of this AD, submit a report of the (t)(1) of this AD, no alternative structural finding to Airbus, Customer Service Corrective Actions inspections and inspection intervals may be Directorate, Attn: Department Manager approved. The actions must be accomplished (q) Damaged, cracked, or corroded Maintenance Engineering, 1 Rond Point in accordance with the applicable issue of structure detected during any inspection Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, the ALI. The initial ALI tasks must be done done in accordance with Airbus A310 France; e-mail: [email protected]. The at the times specified in the applicable ALI Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI) report must include the ALI task reference, Document, AI/SE–M2/95A.0263/06, Issue 6, airplane serial number, the number of flight document listed in Table 1 of this AD. dated April 2006 (‘‘Issue 6 of the ALI’’), must cycles and flight hours on the airplane, Accomplishing the applicable initial ALI be repaired, before further flight, in identification of the affected structure, tasks constitutes terminating action for the accordance with Issue 6 of the ALI; or in location and description of the finding requirements of paragraphs (g) through (r) of accordance with other data meeting the including its size and orientation, and the this AD for that airplane only.

TABLE 1—AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS ITEMS DOCUMENT

Model Document Issue Date

A300 ...... Airbus A300 Airworthiness Limitation Items Document AI/SE–M2/95A.1308/07 ...... 4 June 2008. A310 ...... Airbus A310 Airworthiness Limitation Items Document AI/SE-M2/95A.1309/07 ...... 7 June 2008. A300–600 ...... Airbus A300–600 Airworthiness Limitation Items Document AI/SE-M2/95A.1310/07 ...... 12 June 2008.

FAA AD Differences 2007–20–03, Amendment 39–15213; and AD Information Collection Clearance Officer, 2007–25–02, Amendment 39–15283; as AES–200. Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI applicable; are approved as AMOCs for the and/or service information as follows: corresponding provisions of this AD. Related Information Where the MCAI includes a compliance (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement time of ‘‘from the effective date of this AD,’’ (u) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness in this AD to obtain corrective actions from we have determined that a compliance time Directive 2009–0155, dated July 17, 2009; a manufacturer or other source, use these of ‘‘within 3 months after the effective date Airbus A300–600 Airworthiness Limitation of the AD’’ is appropriate. The manufacturer actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective Items (ALI) Document AI/SE–M2/95A.0502/ and EASA agree with this difference in actions are considered FAA-approved if they 06, Issue 11, dated April 2006; Airbus A300– are approved by the State of Design Authority compliance time. 600 ALI Document AI/SE–M2/95A.1310/07, (or their delegated agent). You are required Issue 12, dated June 2008; Airbus A300 ALI Other FAA AD Provisions to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. Document SEM2/95A.1090/05, Issue 3, dated (t) The following provisions also apply to September 2005, as revised by Airbus A300 this AD: (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a Temporary Revision (TR) 3.1, dated April (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 2006; Airbus A300 ALI Document AI/SE– (AMOCs): The Manager, International person is not required to respond to, nor M2/95A.1308/07, Issue 4, dated June 2008; Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane shall a person be subject to a penalty for Directorate, FAA, has the authority to failure to comply with a collection of Airbus A310 ALI Document, AI/SE–M2/ approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested information subject to the requirements of 95A.0263/06, Issue 6, dated April 2006; using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that Airbus TR 6.1, dated November 2006; Airbus Send information to Attn: Dan Rodina, collection of information displays a current A310 ALI Document, AI/SE–M2/95A.1309/ Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, valid OMB Control Number. The OMB 07, Issue 7, dated June 2008; and Airbus ANM–116, FAA, Transport Airplane Control Number for this information Industrie A300 Structural Inspection Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for Document’’ (SSID), Revision 2, dated June Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) this collection of information is estimated to 1994; for related information. 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using be approximately 5 minutes per response, any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate including the time for reviewing instructions, Issued in Renton, Washington, on January principal inspector, or lacking a principal completing and reviewing the collection of 13, 2011. inspector, the manager of the local flight information. All responses to this collection Jeffrey E. Duven, of information are mandatory. Comments standards district office/certificate holding Acting Manager, Transport Airplane district office. The AMOC approval letter concerning the accuracy of this burden and Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. must specifically reference this AD. AMOCs suggestions for reducing the burden should approved previously in accordance with AD be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence [FR Doc. 2011–1439 Filed 1–24–11; 8:45 am] 2007–04–11, Amendment 39–14943; AD Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:39 Jan 24, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM 25JAP1 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS