DOCSLIB.ORG

Grand River Sediment Transport Modeling Study (USACE)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grand River Sediment Transport Modeling Study (USACE) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District GRAND RIVER SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODELING STUDY P repared by: W.F. BAIRD & ASSOCIATES LTD. MADISON, WI MAY 23, 2007 Baird USACE - Detroit District Grand River Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office Sediment Transport Modeling Study Grand River Sediment Transport Modeling Study For further information please contact James P. Selegean, P.E, PhD.: (313) 226-6791 In reference, this document should be cited as: USACE, Detroit District, Grand River Sediment Transport Modeling Study, May 2007. This report was prepared by W.F. Baird & Associates, Ltd. for USACE Detroit District. The material in it reflects the judgment of Baird & Associates in light of the information available to them at the time of preparation. Any use which a Third Party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such Third Parties. Baird & Associates accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any Third Party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. USACE – Detroit District Grand River Watershed Model Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office User Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of Study .............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Watershed Description ...................................................................................................................1 1.3 Hydrologic & Sediment Analyses ..................................................................................................3 1.4 Grand River Watershed Modeling System ...................................................................................3 1.5 Report Outline.................................................................................................................................4 2.0 DATA COLLECTION ...................................................................................5 2.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................5 2.2 Summary of Stakeholders’ Meeting ..............................................................................................5 2.3 Previous Studies ..............................................................................................................................6 2.4 Data Sources ....................................................................................................................................6 2.4.1 Precipitation Data...................................................................................................................7 2.4.2 Discharge Data .......................................................................................................................7 2.4.3 Suspended Sediment Data ......................................................................................................7 2.5 GIS Data.........................................................................................................................................11 2.6 Field Data Collection Summary...................................................................................................17 2.6.1 Grand River Baseline Survey ...............................................................................................18 3.0 PRELIMINARY ANALYSES AND WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ..... 20 3.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................20 3.2 Land Use History and Analysis....................................................................................................20 3.2.1 Historic Land Use Change ...................................................................................................20 3.2.2 Land Use Breakdown by Subbasin.......................................................................................25 3.3 Riparian Buffer Analysis..............................................................................................................31 3.3.1 Introduction to Buffer ..........................................................................................................31 3.3.2 Comparison of LU Breakdown in Subbasins with Buffer Zones........................................31 3.3.3 GIS Calculation of Required Buffer Widths by Subbasin for Entire Watershed for Effective Sediment Removal..................................................................................................................33 3.3.4 Aerial Photo Analysis of Riparian Buffer Extent for Selected Subbasins..........................34 3.4 Analysis of Watershed Hydrologic Alteration............................................................................38 3.4.1 Flashiness Analysis ..............................................................................................................39 3.4.2 Baseflow Analysis .................................................................................................................39 3.4.3 Results and Discussion .........................................................................................................40 3.5 Watershed Geology .......................................................................................................................43 3.6 Grand River Watershed Sediment Delivery ...............................................................................46 USACE - Detroit District Table of Contents Grand River Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office Sediment Transport Modeling Study 3.6.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................46 3.6.2 Known Sediment Sources, Scour and Deposition Areas .....................................................48 3.6.3 Sediment Yield and Sediment Delivery in the Grand River Watershed ..............................50 4.0 WATERSHED-SCALE HYDROLOGY AND SEDIMENT DELIVERY SIMULATION USING SWAT...................................................................... 53 4.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................53 4.2 SWAT Model Description ............................................................................................................53 4.2.1 SWAT Model Background....................................................................................................54 4.2.2 Characterization of Processes Using SWAT........................................................................54 4.2.3 ArcView SWAT Interface - AVSWAT..................................................................................55 4.3 Grand River SWAT Model ..........................................................................................................56 4.3.1 Model Development ..............................................................................................................56 4.3.2 Model Calibration.................................................................................................................61 4.3.3 Model Validation ..................................................................................................................62 4.3.4 Model Output Description ....................................................................................................67 4.3.5 Model Results........................................................................................................................68 4.3.6 Model Limitations.................................................................................................................70 4.3.7 Future SWAT Developments................................................................................................70 5.0 ILLUSTRATION OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES............................ 71 5.1 Introduction to BMP Modeling....................................................................................................71 5.2 SWAT BMP Modeling..................................................................................................................72 5.2.1 Dams & Reservoirs as Sediment Traps................................................................................72 5.2.2 Conservation Tillage.............................................................................................................73 5.2.3 Filter Strips ...........................................................................................................................74 5.3 Discussion.......................................................................................................................................76 6.0 SUMMARY................................................................................................ 77 6.1 Existing Conditions .......................................................................................................................77 6.2 SWAT Model.................................................................................................................................78 6.3 BMPs ..............................................................................................................................................79 7.0 REFERENCES..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physical Limnology of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron
    PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY OF SAGINAW BAY, LAKE HURON ALFRED M. BEETON U. S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan STANFORD H. SMITH U. S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan and FRANK H. HOOPER Institute for Fisheries Research Michigan Department of Conservation Ann Arbor, Michigan GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION 1451 GREEN ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN SEPTEMBER, 1967 PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY OF SAGINAW BAY, LAKE HURON1 Alfred M. Beeton, 2 Stanford H. Smith, and Frank F. Hooper3 ABSTRACT Water temperature and the distribution of various chemicals measured during surveys from June 7 to October 30, 1956, reflect a highly variable and rapidly changing circulation in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. The circula- tion is influenced strongly by local winds and by the stronger circulation of Lake Huron which frequently causes injections of lake water to the inner extremity of the bay. The circulation patterns determined at six times during 1956 reflect the general characteristics of a marine estuary of the northern hemisphere. The prevailing circulation was counterclockwise; the higher concentrations of solutes from the Saginaw River tended to flow and enter Lake Huron along the south shore; water from Lake Huron entered the northeast section of the bay and had a dominant influence on the water along the north shore of the bay. The concentrations of major ions varied little with depth, but a decrease from the inner bay toward Lake Huron reflected the dilution of Saginaw River water as it moved out of the bay. Concentrations in the outer bay were not much greater than in Lake Huronproper.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAND RIVER MARKETPLACE & MCNICHOLS RD DETROIT, MI Type: Lease WAYNE COUNTY
    SEQ OF GRAND RIVER AVE GRAND RIVER MARKETPLACE & MCNICHOLS RD DETROIT, MI Type: Lease WAYNE COUNTY PROPERTY TYPE: Shopping Center DESCRIPTION: Great opportunity to be part of an exciting RENT: Endcap: $29.00/SF new development on Grand River Ave in Inline: $25.00/SF Detroit. This property will be situated on the NNN EXPENSE: Est. at $5.00/SF southeast corner of Grand River and McNichols, right across the street from a AVAILABLE SPACE: Bldg A: 1,400 SF, land lease new Meijer. This area is extremely dense Bldg B: 7,700 SF, divisible with over 53,600 households in a 3-mile Bldg C: 9,000 SF, divisible radius and Grand River is a heavily travelled TENANT ROSTER: Meijer (across the street) – road in Detroit with 24,292 vpd. Call us to be coming spring 2015 part of this opportunity! TRAFFIC COUNT: Grand River northwest of McNichols = 24,292 cpd McNichols east of Grand River = 20,060 cpd CONTACT: John Kello Scott Sonenberg (248) 488-2620 Radius: 1 Mile 3 Mile 5 Mile Pop. Density: 15,811 134,922 345,587 Avg. HH Income: $39,100 $49,140 $51,737 LANDMARK COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES – Licensed Real Estate Brokers. The information above has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While we do not doubt its accuracy, we have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is your responsibility to independently confirm its accuracy and completeness. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates are used for example only and do not represent the current or future performance of the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Supply Development and Management Alternatives for Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties, Michigan
    Water-Supply Development and Management Alternatives for Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties, Michigan By K. E. VANLIER, W. W. WOOD, and J. 0. BRUNETT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1969 Prepared in cooperation with the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600363 For ...e by the Superintendent of Doewnenta, U.S. Government PrintintJ Oftiee Wuhin-'on, D.C. 20402-Priee 13.20 (paper eover) Stoek Number 2401-02422 CONTENTS Page ~bstract ------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction --------------------------------------------------- 1 Purpose and scope -·---------------------------------------- 2 ~cknowledgments _ ----__ ------------------------------------ 2 Characteristics of the region ------------------------------------- 3 The economic base and population ---------------------------- 5 VVater use ------------------------------------------------- 9 VVithdrawal uses --------------------------------------- 9 Nonwithdrawal uses ------------------------------------ 12 Sources of water ----------------------------------------------- 13 The hydrologic cycle ---------------------------------------- 13 Interrelationship of ground and surface waters ------------ 14 Induced recharge --------------------------------------- 16 Water in streams -------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • DEQ RRD BULLETIN Tittabawassee/Saginaw River
    MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY John Engler, Governor • Russell J. Harding, Director INTERNET: www.michigan.gov/deq DEQ ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE DIVISION INFORMATION BULLETIN TITTABAWASSEE/SAGINAW RIVER FLOOD PLAIN Environmental Assessment Initiative Midland, Saginaw counties February 2002 INTRODUCTION PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Flood Plain Soil This is the first in a series of bulletins to inform area communities about progress, future plans, meeting Historical flow data indicates that during the spring dates, and other activities regarding the and fall months it is common for the flow of water Tittabawassee/Saginaw River Flood Plain Dioxin within the Tittabawassee River to increase to a Environmental Assessment Initiative. What follows level that causes the river to expand onto its flood is an overview of the Department of Environmental plain. During these high flow periods it is possible Quality (DEQ) efforts to identify flood plain areas that sediments, and dioxins that have come to be where dioxin and dioxin-related compounds located in the sediments, are transported from the (hereinafter referred to collectively as “dioxin”) river bottom, or other unidentified source areas, could pose public health or environmental concern. and deposited onto the flood plain. Please refer to the accompanying document entitled “Dioxins Fact Sheet” for a more detailed From December 2000 through July 2001, DEQ account of public health and environmental issues Environmental Response Division (ERD) staff associated with dioxin compounds. A map collected soil samples from the Tittabawassee identifying the environmental assessment area is River flood plain at three locations: 1) at property also included. near the headwaters of the Saginaw River, 2) at property located near the end of Arthur Street in As always, DEQ staff is available to help clarify Saginaw Township, and 3) along the northern issues or address concerns you may have on any perimeter of the Shiawassee National Wildlife aspect of the environmental assessment initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Saginaw River/Bay Fish & Wildlife Habitat BUI Removal Documentation
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 6 MAY 2014 REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF Mr. Roger Eberhardt Acting Deputy Director, Office of the Great Lakes Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 525 West Allegan P.O. Box 30473 Lansing, Michigan 48909-7773 Dear Roger: Thank you for your February 6, 2014, request to remove the "Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat" Beneficial Use Impairment (BUI) from the Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern (AOC) in Michigan, As you know, we share your desire to restore all of the Great Lakes AOCs and to formally delist them. Based upon a review of your submittal and the supporting data, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hereby approves your BUI removal request for the Saginaw River/Bay AOC, EPA will notify the International Joint Commission of this significant positive environmental change at this AOC. We congratulate you and your staff, as well as the many federal, state, and local partners who have worked so hard and been instrumental in achieving this important environmental improvement. Removal of this BUI will benefit not only the people who live and work in the Saginaw River/Bay AOC, but all the residents of Michigan and the Great Lakes basin as well. We look forward to the continuation of this important and productive relationship with your agency and the local coordinating committee as we work together to fully restore all of Michigan's AOCs. If you have any further questions, please contact me at (312) 353-4891, or your staff may contact John Perrecone, at (312) 353-1149.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alpena FWCO - Detroit River Substation Fisheries Evaluation of the Frankenmuth Rock Ramp in Frankenmuth, MI Final Report - October 2019 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alpena FWCO – Detroit River Substation 9311 Groh Road Grosse Ile, MI 48138 Paige Wigren, Justin Chiotti, Joe Leonardi, and James Boase Suggested Citation: Wigren, P.L., J.A. Chiotti, J.M. Leonardi, and J.C. Boase. 2019. Alpena FWCO – Detroit River Substation Fisheries Evaluation of the Frankenmuth Rock Ramp in Frankenmuth, MI. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alpena Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office – Waterford Substation, Waterford, MI, 22 pp. On the cover: Staff from the Alpena Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office – Detroit River Substation holding the only northern pike that was recaptured upstream of the rock ramp; a tagged walleye; a small flathead catfish; a net full of tagged fish ready to be released downstream; four tagged white suckers recaptured upstream and boat crew conducting an electrofishing transect. 3 Summary Since the construction of the rock ramp, 17 fish species not previously detected upstream have been captured. These species include eight freshwater drum, eleven walleye, two gizzard shad, eight flathead catfish and two round goby. Over the past three years 2,604 fish have been tagged downstream of the rock ramp. Twenty-nine of these fish were recaptured upstream during boat electrofishing assessments or by anglers. Based on the mean monthly discharge of the Cass River during April and May, the data suggests that white and redhorse suckers can move past the rock ramp during normal discharge years.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Human Impacts on the Grand River
    Historical Human Impacts on the Grand River Even before Europeans settled on the east banks of the Grand River, in what is now downtown Grand Rapids, humankind had been affecting the water quality of the Lower Grand River Watershed. Many native peoples used the Grand River for fishing, transportation, and other daily activities. 1“The Grand River is Michigan’s largest stream. It extends 270 miles through Jackson to Grand Haven. The Indians knew it as ‘Owashtanong’, meaning ‘far away waters’.” The Grand River Times in 1837 mentioned the Grand River as “one of the most important and delightful [rivers] to be found in the country” with “clear, silver-like water winding its way through a romantic valley.” Europeans impacted the river greatly in the next one hundred years as industrialization spread across the country. As early as 1889, Everette Fitch recorded the detrimental effects humankind was having on the Grand River. She wrote, “The channel was, as usual, covered with a green odiferous scum, mixed with oil from the gas works.” Even more than a century ago the Grand River was deteriorating, its banks clogged with mills and factories and its water clogged with logs and dams. In its history the river has been abused with waterpower, river-dependant industries, large increases in population, stripping of the forests, and discharges of chemical and sewage wastes. The prediction in 1905 by the Grand Rapids Evening Press was that by the year 2005 the Grand River would be more a sewer than a river. Today’s Human Impacts on the Grand River Today, technology and knowledge have been used to improve water quality in the main channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Flint River GREEN Notebook Table of Contents Section One - Introduction to Flint River GREEN
    Flint River GREEN www.FlintRiver.org Flint River GREEN Notebook Table of Contents Section One - Introduction to Flint River GREEN a. FRWC b. GREEN c. Earth Force d. MSU Extension; 4-H Youth Development e. School Administration Letter (Phase II & Participant Appreciation) f. Flint River GREEN Objectives Section Two – Information for Mentors a. Who are mentors? b. Timeline for Teachers and Mentor Interactions c. Importance of Mentors d. Inquiry Training e. How to talk to youth f. Sample Presentations for Mentors Section Three – BEFORE River Activities a. Curriculum Benchmarks and Standards i. 8th Grade Earth Science Standards ii. 10th Grade Biology Standards b. Incorporating Other Teachers iii. Civic Engagement: Social Studies, Language Arts iv. Technology: Media Support, Presentations v. Sharing Testing: Chemistry, Mathematics c. Ordering Materials vi. Shelf Life of Chemicals vii. Disposal of Old Chemicals d. Inquiry Training: Why is the Data Important viii. How Can the Information Be Used ix. Who Is Currently Interested in the Data e. Selecting A Testing Site / Finding A Good Fit f. Preparing Kids for the Day at the River x. Attire Flint River GREEN www.FlintRiver.org xi. Who Does Which Test g. Run Through the Tests h. Looking at Historical Data i. Permission Slip/Photo releases j. Notifying the media and elected officials xii. Sample Press Release k. Optional Activities xiii. Model Watershed Activity xiv. Watershed Planning – Desired & Designated Uses xv. ELUCID – Flint River Watershed by MSU Institute of Water Research Section Four – Day At the River a. Deciding Who Goes to the River b. Checklist for Things to Take Out to the River c.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Enrolled Bill
    Act No. 353 Public Acts of 1996 Approved by the Governor July 1, 1996 Filed with the Secretary of State July 1, 1996 STATE OF MICHIGAN 88TH LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION OF 1996 Introduced by Senators McManus, Gast, Steil, Geake, Rogers, Bennett and Schuette ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 979 AN ACT to make appropriations for the department of natural resources and the department of environmental quality for the fiscal year ending September 30,1996; to provide for the acquisition of land and development rights; to provide for certain work projects; to provide for the development of public recreation facilities; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state agencies and officials; and to provide for the expenditure of appropriations. The People of the State of Michigan enact: Sec. 1. There is appropriated for the department of natural resources to supplement former appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, the sum of $20,714,100.00 for land acquisition and grants and $5,688,800.00 for public recreation facility development and grants as provided in section 35 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 and part 19 (natural resources trust fund) of the natural resources and environmental protection act, Act No. 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.1901 to 324.1910 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, from the following funds: For Fiscal Year Ending Sept. 30, 1996 GROSS APPROPRIATIONS............................................................................................................ $ 26,402,900 Appropriated from: Special revenue funds: Michigan natural resources trust fund.............................................................................................. $ 26,402,900 State general fund/general purpose................................................................................................... $ 0 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1506 N GRAND RIVER AVE LANSING, MICHIGAN Request for Developer Qualifications RFQ | Lansing 1506 North Grand River Avenue
    1506 N GRAND RIVER AVE LANSING, MICHIGAN Request for Developer Qualifications RFQ | Lansing 1506 North Grand River Avenue Development Opportunity....................................................................................................... 4 Community Overview .............................................................................................................. 5 Market Conditions and Opportunities ................................................................................... 10 Site Overview ......................................................................................................................... 14 Site Utilities ............................................................................................................................ 16 Additional Site Information .................................................................................................... 17 Preferred Development Scenario .......................................................................................... 18 Project Incentives ................................................................................................................... 20 Selection Process and Criteria ............................................................................................... 21 Schedule for Review and Selection ........................................................................................ 22 2 RFQ | Lansing 1506 North Grand River Avenue 1506 North Grand River Avenue, Lansing The Ingham County Land Bank seeks a development
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist Are Specially Adapted to Finding Food Don’T Expect to See Fish Swimming Deep Below in Low-Light Environments
    HABITATS OF THE LOWER GRAND RIVER FISHES OF THE LOWER GRAND RIVER The warm, muddy water of the Grand River is home to more than 100 species FISH WATCHING of fish. Some are large river fish that A CHECKLIST are specially adapted to finding food Don’t expect to see fish swimming deep below in low-light environments. Many others the turbid water of the Grand, but late summer is use the Grand as a connecting highway a good time to see gar gulping air at the surface. between their preferred habitats. Schools of young shad also create disturbances on the surface. When the water is calm in backwaters and at the mouth of the river, you can observe a variety of sucker species, carp, drum and bass feeding over rocks or shallow flats. Backwaters include a drowned river mouth lake (Spring Lake), numerous bayous and COllECTING FISH man-made gravel pits. Some are dominated Angling with hook and line is the best way to by rich plankton blooms and others offer catch most species. Even minnows and darters abundant rooted vegetation. will strike a tiny fly or hook baited with a piece of worm. Nets and minnow traps are also legal gear Many small creeks flow to theGrand River. for certain species in some environments (check Some suffer from excessive sediment and the Michigan Fishing Guide for regulations). nutrients, which creates poor water quality Seines are a good choice for snag-free flats and that can limit fish diversity. However, others cast nets are effective on open water species in like the upper reaches of Crockery Creek Lake Michigan waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes
    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
    [Show full text]