Saharan Predators
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Factors Affecting Invasive Species Abundance: the Barbary Ground Squirrel on Fuerteventura Island, Spain Marta López-Darias1,* and Jorge M
Zoological Studies 47(3): 268-281 (2008) Factors Affecting Invasive Species Abundance: the Barbary Ground Squirrel on Fuerteventura Island, Spain Marta López-Darias1,* and Jorge M. Lobo2 1Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), Pabellón del Perú, Avenida María Luisa s/n, Sevilla, E-41013, Spain 2Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Calle José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, Madrid, E-28006, Spain. E-mail:[email protected] (Accepted November 14, 2007) Marta López-Darias and Jorge M. Lobo (2008) Factors affecting invasive species abundance: the Barbary ground squirrel on Fuerteventura Island, Spain. Zoological Studies 47(3): 268-281. We assessed the determinants of habitat selection by the Barbary ground squirrel (Atlantoxerus getulus) at Fuerteventura (Canary Is., Spain). We implemented general linear model (GLM) procedures to analyze the relationships between squirrel abundances and 4 kinds of variables related to the biological requirements of the species (environment, food resources, biotic interactions, and refuge/shelter). We performed a variance partitioning analysis between the most explicative categories to explore correlation patterns. The time of year and weather conditions of the census clearly influenced the number of individuals observed. Shelter variables were the best correlates of both the abundance of squirrels and the number of their scat. Although food resources were less important, the presence of certain plant species was correlated with squirrel abundance, while general environmental variables and interactions with other mammals did not affect its distribution. These results improve our understanding of the ecology and the establishment of this highly successful introduced species, providing basic knowledge for use with future management strategies in the Canarian Archipelago. -
Mammalian Predators Appropriating the Refugia of Their Prey
Mamm Res (2015) 60:285–292 DOI 10.1007/s13364-015-0236-y ORIGINAL PAPER When prey provide more than food: mammalian predators appropriating the refugia of their prey William J. Zielinski 1 Received: 30 September 2014 /Accepted: 20 July 2015 /Published online: 31 July 2015 # Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland (outside the USA) 2015 Abstract Some mammalian predators acquire both food and predators) may play disproportionately important roles in their shelter from their prey, by eating them and using the refugia communities. the prey construct. I searched the literature for examples of predators that exhibit this behavior and summarize their taxo- Keywords Predator–prey . Dens . Herbivore . Behavior . nomic affiliations, relative sizes, and distributions. I hypothe- Habitat . Resting . Foraging sized that size ratios of species involved in this dynamic would be near 1.0, and that most of these interactions would occur at intermediate and high latitudes. Seventeen species of Introduction Carnivorans exploited at least 23 species of herbivores as food and for their refugia. Most of them (76.4 %) were in the Mammals require food and most require shelter, either to pro- Mustelidae; several small species of canids and a few tect them from predators or from thermal stress. Carnivorous herpestids were exceptions. Surprisingly, the average mammals are unique in that they subsist on mobile food predator/prey weight ratio was 10.51, but few species of pred- sources which, particularly if these sources are vertebrates, ators were more than ten times the weight of the prey whose may build their own refuges to help regulate their body tem- refugia they exploit. -
A Review of Bristly Ground Squirrels Xerini and a Generic Revision in the African Genus Xerus
Mammalia 2016; 80(5): 521–540 Boris Kryštufek*, Ahmad Mahmoudi, Alexey S. Tesakov, Jan Matějů and Rainer Hutterer A review of bristly ground squirrels Xerini and a generic revision in the African genus Xerus DOI 10.1515/mammalia-2015-0073 Received April 28, 2015; accepted October 13, 2015; previously Introduction published online December 12, 2015 Bristly ground squirrels from the arid regions of Central Abstract: Bristly ground squirrels Xerini are a small rodent Asia and Africa constitute a coherent monophyletic tribe tribe of six extant species. Despite a dense fossil record the Xerini sensu Moore (1959). The tribe contains six species group was never diverse. Our phylogenetic reconstruction, in three genera of which Atlantoxerus and Spermophilop based on the analysis of cytochrome b gene and including sis are monotypic. The genus Xerus in its present scope all known species of Xerini, confirms a deep divergence (Thorington and Hoffmann 2005), consists of four species between the African taxa and the Asiatic Spermophilopsis. in three subgenera: X. inauris and X. princeps (subgenus Genetic divergences among the African Xerini were of a Geosciurus), X. rutilus (subgenus Xerus), and X. eryth comparable magnitude to those among genera of Holarc- ropus (subgenus Euxerus). Recent phylogenetic recon- tic ground squirrels in the subtribe Spermophilina. Evi- struction based on molecular markers retrieved Xerus to dent disparity in criteria applied in delimitation of genera be paraphyletic with respect to Atlantoxerus (Fabre et al. in Sciuridae induced us to recognize two genera formerly 2012), therefore challenging the suitability of the generic incorporated into Xerus. The resurrected genera (Euxerus arrangement of the group. -
Observations on Behavior of Barbary Ground Squirrel
34 Rev Rom Med Vet (2016) 26 | 1: 34-40 ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC WORKS | LUCRĂRI ORIGINALE OBSERVATIONS ON BEHAVIOR OF BARBARY GROUND SQUIRREL (ATLANTOXERUS GETULUS) HELD IN CAPTIVITY OBSERVAŢII ASUPRA COMPORTAMENTULUI VEVERIŢEI MAROCANE (ATLANTOXERUS GETULUS) CRESCUTĂ ÎN CAPTIVITATE Mala Maria STAVRESCU-BEDIVAN1), P. B. MATEI2), B. GEORGESCU3) The aim of this article is to present some biological Scopul acestui articol este acela de a prezenta and ethological aspects regarding the Barbary ground unele aspecte de biologie şi etologie privind veveriţa squirrel held in captivity for study. marocană crescută în captivitate pentru studiu. Two pairs of Atlantoxerus getulus (Linnaeus, Două perechi de Atlantoxerus getulus (Linnaeus, 1758) were bought from a petshop in Rabat, Morrocco 1758) au fost achiziţionate dintr-un petshop din Ra- to the end of the scientific expedition Merzouga (April- bat, Maroc, la sfârşitul expediţiei ştiinţifice Merzouga May 2013), by the second author of the present study, (aprilie-mai 2013), de către al doilea autor al pre- a person with a rich background in animal keeping. zentului studiu, o persoană cu o bogată experienţă în The four squirreles were habituated as pets in a space creşterea animalelor. Cele patru veveriţe au fost cres- which respects, in accordance to a laboratory, all tech- cute ca animale de companie într-un spaţiu ce respec- nical, bioethical and sanitary standards required for tă, întocmai ca un laborator, toate normativele tehni- raising animals in captivity. There were observed the ce, bioetice şi sanitare impuse pentru creşterea ani- defining behavioral patterns (e.g. feeding, resting, malelor în captivitate. Au fost observate tipurile com- grooming), for constructing the ethogram in Barbary portamentale definitorii (de exemplu, hrănire, odihnă, ground squirrel. -
Facts and Misconceptions on the Palaearctic Existence of the Striped
Mammalia 2017; aop Boris Kryštufek, Cătălin Stanciu, Danijel Ivajnšič*, Sidi Imad Cherkaoui and Franc Janžekovič Facts and misconceptions on the Palaearctic existence of the striped ground squirrel https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0060 echo the exclusive ecological requirements of species Received May 26, 2017; accepted July 27, 2017 and their evolutionary history in response to past eco- logical and geological processes (Lomolino et al. 2006). Abstract: The striped ground squirrel has a wide distri- Species’ ranges can be studied at various temporal and bution in the Ethiopian region but is restricted to a small spatial scales provided they are already documented. isolated area in Palaearctic Africa. This fragment was first Before a distributional map can be produced, data on recorded in the late 1940s in the Souss Valley (Morocco), spatial occurrence must be collected in the field. Despite however, not a single new observation has been published its obvious simplicity, field work constitutes a crucial step in the following decades. In September 2016 we surveyed and affects the consistency of analyses which may depend the Souss Valley and found squirrels at 43 sites within upon sophisticated tools and concepts. Incomplete or the triangle between Agadir–Taroudant–Tiznit. Occupied misleading distributional data will unavoidably compro- sites were not distributed at random but occurred between mise subsequent analyses and assessments. an altitude of 45–254 m and on a substrate with coarse tex- In this study we have addressed the only Palaearctic ture containing >65% sand. The vast majority of the sites occurrence of the striped ground squirrel Euxerus with squirrels (69%) were classified as suburban, culti- erythropus (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire 1803) (formerly Xerus vated or both. -
Evolutionary History of Carnivora (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria) Inferred
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.326090; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. 1 Manuscript for review in PLOS One 2 3 Evolutionary history of Carnivora (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria) inferred 4 from mitochondrial genomes 5 6 Alexandre Hassanin1*, Géraldine Véron1, Anne Ropiquet2, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren3, 7 Alexis Lécu4, Steven M. Goodman5, Jibran Haider1,6,7, Trung Thanh Nguyen1 8 9 1 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Sorbonne Université, 10 MNHN, CNRS, EPHE, UA, Paris. 11 12 2 Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, 13 United Kingdom. 14 15 3 Centre for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, Department of Zoology, 16 University of Johannesburg, South Africa. 17 18 4 Parc zoologique de Paris, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. 19 20 5 Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA. 21 22 6 Department of Wildlife Management, Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Arid Agriculture University 23 Rawalpindi, Pakistan. 24 25 7 Forest Parks & Wildlife Department Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. 26 27 28 * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.326090; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work. -
Familia Sciuridae 1
CATÁLOGO ESPAÑOL DE ESPECIES EXÓTICAS INVASORAS Familia Sciuridae SCI/EEI/MA014 Hemprich, 1820 Castellano: Ardillas, marmotas, perros de las praderas, etc. Nombre vulgar Catalán. --: Euskera: -- Grupo taxonómico: Fauna Phylum: Chordata Clase: Mammalia Orden: Rodentia Familia: Sciuridae Subfamilia Sciurinae Subfamila Pteromynae Según Integrated Taxonomic Information System ITIS http://www.itis.gov/ Subfamilia Sciurinae Ammospermophilus Merriam, 1892 Paraxerus Forsyth Major, 1893 Atlantoxerus Forsyth Major, 1893 Prosciurillus Ellerman, 1947 Callosciurus Gray, 1867 Protoxerus Forsyth Major, 1893 Cynomys Rafinesque, 1817 Ratufa Gray, 1867 Dremomys Heude, 1898 Rheithrosciurus Gray, 1867 Posición taxonómica Epixerus Thomas, 1909 Rhinosciurus Blyth, 1856 Exilisciurus Moore, 1958 Rubrisciurus Ellerman, 1954 Funambulus Lesson, 1835 Sciurillus Thomas, 1914 Funisciurus Trouessart, 1880 Sciurotamias Miller, 1901 Glyphotes Thomas, 1898 Sciurus Linnaeus, 1758 Heliosciurus Trouessart, 1880 Spermophilopsis Blasius, 1884 Hyosciurus Archbold and Tate, 1935 Spermophilus F. Cuvier, 1825 Lariscus Thomas and Wroughton, 1909 Sundasciurus Moore, 1958 Marmota Blumenbach, 1779 Syntheosciurus Bangs, 1902 Menetes Thomas, 1908 Tamias Illiger, 1811 Microsciurus J. A. Allen, 1895 Tamiasciurus Trouessart, 1880 Myosciurus Thomas, 1909 Tamiops J. A. Allen, 1906 Nannosciurus Trouessart, 1880 Xerus Hemprich and Ehrenberg, 1833 Subfamila Pteromynae Aeretes G. M. Allen, 1940 Iomys Thomas, 1908 Aeromys Robinson and Kloss, 1915 Petaurillus Thomas, 1908 Belomys Thomas, 1908 -
FURS: GENERAL INFORMATION by Elizabeth R
2 Revised U. So DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Letter March 10 National Bureau of Standards Circular 1964 Washington, D. C. 20234 LCSSS FURS: GENERAL INFORMATION by Elizabeth R. Hosterman CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. KINDS OF FURS: CHARACTERISTICS AND GEOGRAPHICAL 3 SOURCES 2.1 Rodent Family 4 (a) Water rodents 4 (b) Land rodents 4 2.2 Weasel Family 5 2.3 Cat Family 7 2.4 Dog Family S (a) Foxes 3 (b) Wolves a 2.5 Hoofed Animals 9 2.6 Bear-Raccoon Group 10 2.7 Miscellaneous 10 3. FUR MANUFACTURING 10 3.1 Curing and Dressing 10 3.2 Drying and Staking 11 3.3 Dyeing 13 4. SELECTION OF FURS BY CONSUMERS 15 4.1 Cost 15 4 . Use and Durability 16 4.3 Where To Buy 16 4.4 Labels 17 4.5 Workmanship IS 4.6 Quality 19 4.7 Genuine or Simulated 19 4.3 Fit, Style, and Color 19 5. CARE OF FURS 20 5.1 Home and Wearing Care 20 5.2 Storage Care 21 5.3 Cleaning of Furs 21 6. GLOSSARY OF TERMS 22 7 » BIBLIOGRAPHY 23 2 1. INTRODUCTION Both leather dressing and fur dressing have an origin which may be regarded as identical and which date back to a hazy period of antiquity. Ancient man killed animals in order to obtain food. The animals also furnished a skin which, after undergoing certain treatments, could be used as a covering for the body. Man had to, and did, find some means of preventing decay in a more or less permanent fashion. -
Ferret/Polecat
Invasive animal risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of Ferret/polecat Mustela furo and M. putorius Anna Markula, Martin Hannan-Jones and Steve Csurhes First published 2009 Updated 2016 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0/au/deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Insavie animal risk assessment: Ferret/polecat Mustela furo and M. putorius 2 Contents Introduction 4 Taxonomy 4 Is the ferret the same as a European polecat? 4 Description 5 Biology 6 Life history—ferret 6 Life history—polecat 6 Social organisation 7 Diet and hunting behaviour 7 Preferred habitat 8 Predators and diseases 8 Use 8 Distribution and abundance 9 Australia 9 Overseas 9 History as a pest overseas 10 Potential distribution and impact in Queensland 11 Legislative restrictions 12 Overseas 12 Australia and Queensland 12 Numerical risk assessment using the ‘Bomford assessment’ 13 References 14 Appendix 1 16 Invasive animal risk assessment: Ferret/polecat Mustela furo and M. 3 Introduction Taxonomy Species: 1. Mustela furo (ferret/domestic ferret) (Syn. Martes furo, Mustela putorius furo, Putorius putorius furo) 2. Mustela putorius (polecat/European polecat) Family: Mustelidae Related species: Mustela eversmannii (steppe polecat), Mustela nigripes (black-footed ferret) Is the ferret the same as a European polecat? Ferrets have a long history of domestication that dates back to 1500 BC when the Egyptians kept them to control rats and mice. -
List of 28 Orders, 129 Families, 598 Genera and 1121 Species in Mammal Images Library 31 December 2013
What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library LIST OF 28 ORDERS, 129 FAMILIES, 598 GENERA AND 1121 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 DECEMBER 2013 AFROSORICIDA (5 genera, 5 species) – golden moles and tenrecs CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus – Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 4. Tenrec ecaudatus – Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (83 genera, 142 species) – paraxonic (mostly even-toed) ungulates ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BOVIDAE (46 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Impala 3. Alcelaphus buselaphus - Hartebeest 4. Alcelaphus caama – Red Hartebeest 5. Ammotragus lervia - Barbary Sheep 6. Antidorcas marsupialis - Springbok 7. Antilope cervicapra – Blackbuck 8. Beatragus hunter – Hunter’s Hartebeest 9. Bison bison - American Bison 10. Bison bonasus - European Bison 11. Bos frontalis - Gaur 12. Bos javanicus - Banteng 13. Bos taurus -Auroch 14. Boselaphus tragocamelus - Nilgai 15. Bubalus bubalis - Water Buffalo 16. Bubalus depressicornis - Anoa 17. Bubalus quarlesi - Mountain Anoa 18. Budorcas taxicolor - Takin 19. Capra caucasica - Tur 20. Capra falconeri - Markhor 21. Capra hircus - Goat 22. Capra nubiana – Nubian Ibex 23. Capra pyrenaica – Spanish Ibex 24. Capricornis crispus – Japanese Serow 25. Cephalophus jentinki - Jentink's Duiker 26. Cephalophus natalensis – Red Duiker 1 What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library 27. Cephalophus niger – Black Duiker 28. Cephalophus rufilatus – Red-flanked Duiker 29. Cephalophus silvicultor - Yellow-backed Duiker 30. Cephalophus zebra - Zebra Duiker 31. Connochaetes gnou - Black Wildebeest 32. Connochaetes taurinus - Blue Wildebeest 33. Damaliscus korrigum – Topi 34. -
The Role of Mustelids in the Transmission of Sarcocystis Spp. Using Cattle As Intermediate Hosts
animals Article The Role of Mustelids in the Transmission of Sarcocystis spp. Using Cattle as Intermediate Hosts Petras Prakas *, Linas Balˇciauskas , Evelina Juozaityte-Ngugu˙ and Dalius Butkauskas Nature Research Centre, Akademijos Str. 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (E.J.-N.); [email protected] (D.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Members of the genus Sarcocystis are worldwide distributed protozoan parasites. Sarcocystis infections cause great losses in economically important animals. There is a lack of studies on Sarcocystis in naturally infected wild predators, especially of the family Mustelidae which represent a presumably important group of definitive hosts of these parasites. The objective of the present study was to examine the small intestine samples of various mustelid species from Lithuania serving as a possible source of Sarcocystis spp. using cattle as intermediate hosts. Overall, 84 samples collected from five mustelid species were analyzed. Oocysts/sporocysts of Sarcocystis spp. were detected in 75 animals (89.3%). Using molecular methods four Sarcocystis spp., S. bovifelis, S. cruzi, S. hirsuta and S. hominis were identified, with the first two being the most prevalent. These results indicate that mustelids are involved in the transmission of Sarcocystis spp. using cattle as intermediate hosts. The determined high prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. rates cause concerns about food safety issues. To control the spread of infection, further studies on the way carcasses of cattle or beef waste become Citation: Prakas, P.; Balˇciauskas,L.; accessible to mustelids are needed. Juozaityte-Ngugu,˙ E.; Butkauskas, D. The Role of Mustelids in the Abstract: There is a lack of research on the role of mustelids in the transmission of various Sarco- Transmission of Sarcocystis spp. -
Rapid Responses Against Invasive Species on Islands: Lessons from the Introduced Barbary Ground Squirrel Atlantoxerus Getulus in the Canary Islands
Rapid responses against invasive species on islands: lessons from the introduced Barbary ground squirrel Atlantoxerus getulus in the Canary Islands F ÉLIX M. MEDINA,MARTA L ÓPEZ-DARIAS and J ULIEN C. PIQUET Abstract Despite efforts to combat invasive species, further increasing (Martín Esquivel et al., ) and the control of measures are still required to prevent their arrival and some of them entails severe financial costs (e.g. Lampropeltis translocation, especially into biodiverse island ecosystems. californiae; Gesplan, ). The archipelago lacks effective Although many governments worldwide have already estab- control, rapid warning procedures for invasive species, or lished protocols to control alien species, the European a legal framework to control movement of invasive species outermost regions have yet to implement fully effective between islands. prevention or rapid response procedures. The numerous The invasive Barbary ground squirrel Atlantoxerus translocations of the invasive Barbary ground squirrel getulus, which is native to Morocco and Algeria, illustrates Atlantoxerus getulus within the Canary Islands illustrate the situation. A pair of squirrels were taken to Fuerteventura this problem. From to at least . individuals in as pets, and by the s the species had colonized per year have been moved from Fuerteventura to other is- most of the island (López-Darias, ). In Spain the species lands. If movements of these medium-sized vertebrates are is now legally considered an invasive species. Its possession, taking place regularly,