DOCSLIB.ORG

Genetic Structure of the European Polecat (Mustela Putorius) and Its Implication for Conservation Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genetic Structure of the European Polecat (Mustela Putorius) and Its Implication for Conservation Strategies Genetic structure of the European polecat (Mustela putorius) and its implication for conservation strategies C. Pertoldi1,2,3, P. Breyne4, M. T. Cabria5, D. Halfmaerten4, H. A. H. Jansman6, K. Van Den Berge4, A. B. Madsen3 & V. Loeschcke1 1 Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Aarhus C, Denmark 2 Department of Applied Biology, Estaci ´on Biol ´ ogica Do˜ nana, CSIC, Pabell ´on del Peru´ , Seville, Spain 3 Department of Wildlife Ecology and Biodiversity, National Environmental Research Institute, Rønde, Denmark 4 Institute for Forestry and Game Management, Gaverstraat, Geraardsbergen, Belgium 5 Departamento Zoologia y BCA, Facultad Farmacia, Universidad del Pais Vasco, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain 6 Alterra-Centre for Ecosystem Studies, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands Keywords polecat; Mustela putorius; microsatellite DNA; population structure; assignment test; bottleneck; population fragmentation; postglacial recolonization. Correspondence Cino Pertoldi, Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, Building 540, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Fax: +4586127191 Email: [email protected] Received 20 July 2005; accepted 23 November 2005 doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00095.x Abstract During the last century, the European polecat Mustela putorius populations in most of Europe declined and survived in fragmented patches, because of habitat alterations and direct persecution. To assess the genetic consequences of the demographic decline and to describe the spatial pattern of genetic diversity, 250 polecats sampled at seven localities from five European countries – Poland, Denmark (southern Denmark and northern Denmark), Spain, Belgium (eastern and western) and the Netherlands – were screened by means of nine microsatellite loci. Genetic diversity estimated by mean expected heterozygosity (HE) and allelic richness (AR) were moderately high within populations [range: 0.50 (northern Denmark) ≤ HE ≤ 0.64 (Poland) and 1.33 ≤ AR ≤ 7.80] as compared with other carnivores and mustelids. Bottleneck tests suggested that polecat populations in southern Denmark and Poland have declined recently and populations from northern Denmark and the Netherlands have expanded recently, whereas the remaining populations did not show any sign of demographic change. Recent demographic changes could suggest that some of the populations are still not in equilibrium, which could partly explain the relatively high genetic variability observed in polecat populations despite the drastic decline in population size observed in several European countries. A significant heterozygote deficiency [FIS =0.19; 0.01 ≤ 95% confidence interval (CI) ≤ 0.32] suggests substructuring within the total European sample. Partitioning of the genetic variation among sampling locations (FST =0.14; 0.06 ≤ 95% CI ≤ 0.23) and pairwise FST between localities (range: 0.01 ≤ FST ≤ 0.37) without any correlation with the geographic distances between localities were found, suggesting a recent divergence and a restriction of gene flow between populations and the action of genetic drift. An assignment test showed that the Polish and the northern Danish populations were the most unique, whereas the other populations were partially admixed. Factorial component analysis tests indicate a subdivision of the total sample into two distinct groups: one including the samples from Poland and the two Danish localities and the second group comprising the remaining localities investigated. The observed pattern of genetic differentiation is suggested to be due to two main routes of recolonization after the last glacial period. To compare the results obtained with microsatellite data, the most variable region of the mitochondrial DNA (d-loop) was sequenced and different phylogenetic reconstructions and genetic diversity analyses based on nucleotide (π) and haplotype diversity (h) measures within populations were performed using a subsample of populations. The lack of well-defined geographical structure, as well as the reduced level of mitochondrial DNA variability (p: 0.00274 ± 0.00038; h: 0.876 ± 0.028) that was found, has been previously reported in several studies on different carnivores and supports the hypothesis of post-glacial recolonization from southern or eastern refugees of Europe as suggested by the microsatellite data. Implications for conservation strategies of the polecat at the European level are discussed. Introduction Present status of the polecat in Europe The polecat Mustela putorius is a medium-sized carnivore that lives in many parts of Europe (Mitchell-Jones et al., 1999). Its preferred habitat is near bodies of water, like freshwater lakes, rivers and wetlands. Polecats are also found on the edges of forests and grasslands with islands of scrub trees. The polecat is listed in Appendix III of the Bern Convention (European Council, 1979, http://www.eko.org.pl/1kp/prawo_html/konw_bernenska_z3.html) and in Appendix V of the European Community Habitats & Species Directive (1992, http://europa.edu.int/comm/environment/nature/nature_conservation/eu_nature_legislation/habita ts_directive/index_en.htm). The polecat is of some conservation significance as it is considered to be vulnerable in most parts of Europe and threatened in some parts (Birks & Kitchener, 1999). Its distribution range and population densities have decreased in several European countries over the past few decades (Santos Reis, 1983; Vigna Taglianti, 1988; Weber, 1988; Blanco & Gonzalez, 1992; Saint-Girons et al., 1993; Stubbe & Stubbe, 1994; Libois, 1996; Baghli & Verhagen, 2003; Møller et al., 2004). In some other countries however, as for example the Netherlands or in some regions of France, the status of the polecat has been reported as stable (Hollander & Van der Reest, 1994). In Flanders, the northern part of Belgium, polecats never lost the status of ‘commonly spread’ although densities started to decline some decades ago (Van Den Berge & De Pauw, 2003). In Denmark, according to the Danish game bag record the number of polecats killed by hunting during the last 60 years has been declining (Møller et al., 2004). Habitat fragmentation and degradation and more particularly the drainage of wetlands as well as changes in the agricultural landscape have been suggested as the principal causes for the decrease of populations of the polecat in Europe (Blanco & Gonzalez, 1992). Because this mustelid is supposed to be affected by habitat fragmentation and degradation (Bright, 1993), it is considered as an indicator species in human impact studies. Genetic and demographic consequences of habitat fragmentation In conservation biology there is a growing awareness of the consequences of habitat loss and over-exploitation, which often leads to a reduction in population sizes. Today, habitat fragmentation is considered as one of the most serious threats to the survival of animal populations. This is a result of the spatial structuring of populations caused by the loss of area, the reduction in area of remaining fragments and increased distance between fragments (Gerlach & Musolf, 2000). Habitat fragmentation produces a reduction in genetic diversity because of a loss of variability due to low effective population size (NE) and an increased genetic differentiation between remaining fragments. Population subdivision is therefore expected to reduce the adaptive potential that a population has to face up to environment change (Lacy, 1997; Bijlsma, Bundgaard & Boerema, 2000a). Declining adaptive variation might interact negatively with the demographic consequences of habitat loss, raising the risks of extinction (Bijlsma et al., 2000a). The effect of fitness reduction observed in populations with low NE is thought to be partly the result of increased homozygosity for (partially) recessive deleterious alleles (Charlesworth & Charlesworth, 1987). Several studies have documented inbreeding depression in wild populations (reviewed in Keller & Waller, 2002). The substantial variation in the level of inbreeding depression between populations and their consequences seem to be strongly taxon dependent (Crnokrak & Roff, 1999; Keller & Waller, 2002). Therefore, there is a need for a concerted effort to study patterns of genetic variation in a wide variety of taxa at different spatial scales. Studies of spatial population structure in mammals have revealed that most mammalian populations are genetically subdivided, with relatively small NE and low dispersal rates that are consequences of the social and mating systems. The scale of subdivision varies considerably, suggesting that genetic structure is influenced by complex interactions between social organization, dispersal tendencies and environmental factors (Chepko-Sade & Halpin, 1987). We wanted to assess the likelihood for persistence of the polecat populations studied to estimate the genetic variability within the populations and to describe the patterns of genetic differentiation among the populations. Recent reduction of NE can generate large genetic distances among populations and may drastically reduce the genetic variability within populations in a short time period (Hedrick, 1999). Molecular data based on microsatellite variation were chosen for our investigation as microsatellites are highly informative and are currently used in many studies addressing conservation issues (Kyle, Davis & Strobeck, 2000; Kyle, Robitaille & Strobeck, 2001; Walker et al., 2001; Kyle, Davison & Strobeck, 2003). Due to their high mutation rate (fast evolving), microsatellites
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mammalian Predators Appropriating the Refugia of Their Prey
    Mamm Res (2015) 60:285–292 DOI 10.1007/s13364-015-0236-y ORIGINAL PAPER When prey provide more than food: mammalian predators appropriating the refugia of their prey William J. Zielinski 1 Received: 30 September 2014 /Accepted: 20 July 2015 /Published online: 31 July 2015 # Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland (outside the USA) 2015 Abstract Some mammalian predators acquire both food and predators) may play disproportionately important roles in their shelter from their prey, by eating them and using the refugia communities. the prey construct. I searched the literature for examples of predators that exhibit this behavior and summarize their taxo- Keywords Predator–prey . Dens . Herbivore . Behavior . nomic affiliations, relative sizes, and distributions. I hypothe- Habitat . Resting . Foraging sized that size ratios of species involved in this dynamic would be near 1.0, and that most of these interactions would occur at intermediate and high latitudes. Seventeen species of Introduction Carnivorans exploited at least 23 species of herbivores as food and for their refugia. Most of them (76.4 %) were in the Mammals require food and most require shelter, either to pro- Mustelidae; several small species of canids and a few tect them from predators or from thermal stress. Carnivorous herpestids were exceptions. Surprisingly, the average mammals are unique in that they subsist on mobile food predator/prey weight ratio was 10.51, but few species of pred- sources which, particularly if these sources are vertebrates, ators were more than ten times the weight of the prey whose may build their own refuges to help regulate their body tem- refugia they exploit.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of Carnivora (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria) Inferred
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.326090; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. 1 Manuscript for review in PLOS One 2 3 Evolutionary history of Carnivora (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria) inferred 4 from mitochondrial genomes 5 6 Alexandre Hassanin1*, Géraldine Véron1, Anne Ropiquet2, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren3, 7 Alexis Lécu4, Steven M. Goodman5, Jibran Haider1,6,7, Trung Thanh Nguyen1 8 9 1 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Sorbonne Université, 10 MNHN, CNRS, EPHE, UA, Paris. 11 12 2 Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, 13 United Kingdom. 14 15 3 Centre for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, Department of Zoology, 16 University of Johannesburg, South Africa. 17 18 4 Parc zoologique de Paris, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. 19 20 5 Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA. 21 22 6 Department of Wildlife Management, Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Arid Agriculture University 23 Rawalpindi, Pakistan. 24 25 7 Forest Parks & Wildlife Department Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. 26 27 28 * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.326090; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work.
    [Show full text]
  • FURS: GENERAL INFORMATION by Elizabeth R
    2 Revised U. So DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Letter March 10 National Bureau of Standards Circular 1964 Washington, D. C. 20234 LCSSS FURS: GENERAL INFORMATION by Elizabeth R. Hosterman CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. KINDS OF FURS: CHARACTERISTICS AND GEOGRAPHICAL 3 SOURCES 2.1 Rodent Family 4 (a) Water rodents 4 (b) Land rodents 4 2.2 Weasel Family 5 2.3 Cat Family 7 2.4 Dog Family S (a) Foxes 3 (b) Wolves a 2.5 Hoofed Animals 9 2.6 Bear-Raccoon Group 10 2.7 Miscellaneous 10 3. FUR MANUFACTURING 10 3.1 Curing and Dressing 10 3.2 Drying and Staking 11 3.3 Dyeing 13 4. SELECTION OF FURS BY CONSUMERS 15 4.1 Cost 15 4 . Use and Durability 16 4.3 Where To Buy 16 4.4 Labels 17 4.5 Workmanship IS 4.6 Quality 19 4.7 Genuine or Simulated 19 4.3 Fit, Style, and Color 19 5. CARE OF FURS 20 5.1 Home and Wearing Care 20 5.2 Storage Care 21 5.3 Cleaning of Furs 21 6. GLOSSARY OF TERMS 22 7 » BIBLIOGRAPHY 23 2 1. INTRODUCTION Both leather dressing and fur dressing have an origin which may be regarded as identical and which date back to a hazy period of antiquity. Ancient man killed animals in order to obtain food. The animals also furnished a skin which, after undergoing certain treatments, could be used as a covering for the body. Man had to, and did, find some means of preventing decay in a more or less permanent fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferret/Polecat
    Invasive animal risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of Ferret/polecat Mustela furo and M. putorius Anna Markula, Martin Hannan-Jones and Steve Csurhes First published 2009 Updated 2016 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0/au/deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Insavie animal risk assessment: Ferret/polecat Mustela furo and M. putorius 2 Contents Introduction 4 Taxonomy 4 Is the ferret the same as a European polecat? 4 Description 5 Biology 6 Life history—ferret 6 Life history—polecat 6 Social organisation 7 Diet and hunting behaviour 7 Preferred habitat 8 Predators and diseases 8 Use 8 Distribution and abundance 9 Australia 9 Overseas 9 History as a pest overseas 10 Potential distribution and impact in Queensland 11 Legislative restrictions 12 Overseas 12 Australia and Queensland 12 Numerical risk assessment using the ‘Bomford assessment’ 13 References 14 Appendix 1 16 Invasive animal risk assessment: Ferret/polecat Mustela furo and M. 3 Introduction Taxonomy Species: 1. Mustela furo (ferret/domestic ferret) (Syn. Martes furo, Mustela putorius furo, Putorius putorius furo) 2. Mustela putorius (polecat/European polecat) Family: Mustelidae Related species: Mustela eversmannii (steppe polecat), Mustela nigripes (black-footed ferret) Is the ferret the same as a European polecat? Ferrets have a long history of domestication that dates back to 1500 BC when the Egyptians kept them to control rats and mice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Mustelids in the Transmission of Sarcocystis Spp. Using Cattle As Intermediate Hosts
    animals Article The Role of Mustelids in the Transmission of Sarcocystis spp. Using Cattle as Intermediate Hosts Petras Prakas *, Linas Balˇciauskas , Evelina Juozaityte-Ngugu˙ and Dalius Butkauskas Nature Research Centre, Akademijos Str. 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (E.J.-N.); [email protected] (D.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Members of the genus Sarcocystis are worldwide distributed protozoan parasites. Sarcocystis infections cause great losses in economically important animals. There is a lack of studies on Sarcocystis in naturally infected wild predators, especially of the family Mustelidae which represent a presumably important group of definitive hosts of these parasites. The objective of the present study was to examine the small intestine samples of various mustelid species from Lithuania serving as a possible source of Sarcocystis spp. using cattle as intermediate hosts. Overall, 84 samples collected from five mustelid species were analyzed. Oocysts/sporocysts of Sarcocystis spp. were detected in 75 animals (89.3%). Using molecular methods four Sarcocystis spp., S. bovifelis, S. cruzi, S. hirsuta and S. hominis were identified, with the first two being the most prevalent. These results indicate that mustelids are involved in the transmission of Sarcocystis spp. using cattle as intermediate hosts. The determined high prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. rates cause concerns about food safety issues. To control the spread of infection, further studies on the way carcasses of cattle or beef waste become Citation: Prakas, P.; Balˇciauskas,L.; accessible to mustelids are needed. Juozaityte-Ngugu,˙ E.; Butkauskas, D. The Role of Mustelids in the Abstract: There is a lack of research on the role of mustelids in the transmission of various Sarco- Transmission of Sarcocystis spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Incursion Plan PIP 011 Small Mammalian Carnivores
    Pre-incursion Plan PIP 011 Small Mammalian Carnivores Pre-Incursion Plan PIP011 Small Mammalian Carnivores 2 Scope This plan is in place to guide prevention and eradication activities and the management of non-indigenous populations of Mongoose, Stoat, Ferret, Polecat, Meerkat and Weasel (Order Carnivora; Families Herpestidae and Mustelidae) mammals in the wild in Victoria. Version Document Status Date Author Reviewed by Approved for release 1.0 First Draft 25/07/13 Dana Price A.Kay and R. Melville 1.1 Second Draft 10/09/13 Dana Price M. Corry 1.2 Third Draft 01/02/14 Dana Price C. Gillies and A.Glen 1.3 Fourth and final 15/05/14 Dana Price A. Woolnough Visual Standard draft approved by ADP 2.0 New Final 16/5/2016 Ryan Melville D. Price New DEDJTR template and document revision Acknowledgement and special thanks to Al Glen (NZ Landcare Research) and Craig Gillies (Department of Conservation NZ) for reviewing this document and providing comments. Published by the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Agriculture Victoria, May 2016 © The State of Victoria 2016. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 1 Spring Street, Melbourne 3000. Front cover: Stoat. Photo: Image from Wikimedia Commons and reproduced with permission under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic License. ISBN 978-1-925532-45-6 (pdf/online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleobiology, Biogeography, and Systematics of the Black-Footed Ferret, Mustela Nigripes (Audubon and Bachman), 1851
    Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 8 The Black-footed Ferret Article 3 5-1-1986 Paleobiology, biogeography, and systematics of the black-footed ferret, Mustela nigripes (Audubon and Bachman), 1851 Elaine Anderson 730 Magnolia Street, Denver, Colorado 80220 Steven C. Forrest Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 83209, and Biota Research and Consulting Inc., Box 2705, Jackson, Wyoming 83001 Tim W. Clark Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 83209, and Biota Research and Consulting Inc., Box 2705, Jackson, Wyoming 83001 Louise Richardson Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 83209, and Biota Research and Consulting Inc., Box 2705, Jackson, Wyoming 83001 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm Recommended Citation Anderson, Elaine; Forrest, Steven C.; Clark, Tim W.; and Richardson, Louise (1986) "Paleobiology, biogeography, and systematics of the black-footed ferret, Mustela nigripes (Audubon and Bachman), 1851," Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs: Vol. 8 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm/vol8/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. PALEOBIOLOGY, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND SYSTEMATICS OF THE BLACK-FOOTED FERRET, MUSTELA NIGRIPES (AUDUBON AND BACHMAN), 1851 Elaine Anderson', Steven C. Forrest", Tim W. Clark," and Louise Richardson" Abstract. — Extensive literature review and 48 mammal collections containing recent specimens of the endangered ferret black-footed {Mustela nigripes) are used to characterize historic distribution of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial DNA and Palaeontological Evidence for the Origins of Endangered European Mink, Mustela Lutreola
    Animal Conservation (2000) 4, 345–355 © 2000 The Zoological Society of London Printed in the United Kingdom Mitochondrial DNA and palaeontological evidence for the origins of endangered European mink, Mustela lutreola Angus Davison1,2,†, Huw I. Griffiths3, Rachael C. Brookes1,2, Tiit Maran4, David W. Macdonald5, Vadim E. Sidorovich6, Andrew C. Kitchener7, Iñaki Irizar8, Idoia Villate8, Jorge González-Esteban8, Juan Carlos Ceña9, Alfonso Ceña9, Ivan Moya9 and Santiago Palazón Miñano10 1 Vincent Wildlife Trust, 10 Lovat Lane, London EC3R 8DT, UK 2 Institute of Genetics, Q.M.C., University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK 3 Department of Geography, University of Hull, Kingston-upon-Hull HU6 7RX, UK 4 E. M. C. C., Tallinn Zoo, 1 Paldiski Road 145, Tallinn EE0035, Estonia 5 WildCRU, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK 6 Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Skoriny str. 27, Minsk – 220072, Belarus 7 National Museums of Scotland, Chambers St., Edinburgh EH1 1JF, UK 8 Departamento de Vertebrados, Sociedad de Ciencias Aranzadi, Alto de Zorroaga, E – 20014 Donostia – San Sebastián, Spain 9 C/Estambrera 13, 3º-B, Logroño, Spain 10 Departament de Biologia Animal (Vertebrats), Universitat de Barcelona, Avda Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain (Received 13 January 2000; accepted 6 July 2000) Abstract The European mink Mustela lutreola is one of Europe’s most endangered carnivores, with few vul- nerable populations remaining. Surprisingly, a recent phylogeny placed a single mink specimen within the polecat (M. putorius, M. eversmannii) group, suggesting a recent speciation and/or the effects of hybridization. The analysis has now been extended to a further 51 mink and polecats.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years of Research on European Mink Mustela Lutreola L., 1761 Genetics: Where Are We Now in Studies on One of the Most Endangered Mammals?
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Fifty Years of Research on European Mink Mustela lutreola L., 1761 Genetics: Where Are We Now in Studies on One of the Most Endangered Mammals? Jakub Skorupski 1,2 1 Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Adama Mickiewicza 16 St., 70-383 Szczecin, Poland; [email protected]; Tel.: +48-914-441-685 2 Polish Society for Conservation Genetics LUTREOLA, Maciejkowa 21 St., 71-784 Szczecin, Poland Received: 2 October 2020; Accepted: 6 November 2020; Published: 11 November 2020 Abstract: The purpose of this review is to present the current state of knowledge about the genetics of European mink Mustela lutreola L., 1761, which is one of the most endangered mammalian species in the world. This article provides a comprehensive description of the studies undertaken over the last 50 years in terms of cytogenetics, molecular genetics, genomics (including mitogenomics), population genetics of wild populations and captive stocks, phylogenetics, phylogeography, and applied genetics (including identification by genetic methods, molecular ecology, and conservation genetics). An extensive and up-to-date review and critical analysis of the available specialist literature on the topic is provided, with special reference to conservation genetics. Unresolved issues are also described, such as the standard karyotype, systematic position, and whole-genome sequencing, and hotly debated issues are addressed, like the origin of the Southwestern population of the European mink and management approaches of the most distinct populations of the species. Finally, the most urgent directions of future research, based on the research questions arising from completed studies and the implementation of conservation measures to save and restore M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Identifying the Small Mustelids of Britain and Ireland the Small Mustelids Or Weasel Family
    A guide to identifying the small mustelids of Britain and Ireland The small mustelids or weasel family Order: Carnivora Family: Mustelidae The small mustelids are characterised by their long thin body shape, which enables them to follow their prey down small tunnels and burrows. However, because of their similar body shape they can be difficult to distinguish from each other, especially when, as is usually the case, they are seen only briefly and in poor light! Otter Pine Marten Mink Photograph by Clive Craik Polecat For the purposes of identification they can be separated into two groups Stoat based on size: Weasel 1. Weasel and stoat 2. Pine marten, polecat, The otter, one of our larger polecat-ferret and mink mustelids, is shown here for size comparison only. Cover photographs: Irish stoat by Carrie Crowley, Pine marten by Bill Cuthbert, Polecat by Jane Parsons 1. Weasel (Mustela nivalis) and stoat (Mustela erminea) (head and body less than 30cm) Weasels and stoats are generally much smaller than the rest of the mustelids. The other distinguishing feature is the sharp contrast between the reddish-brown coat colour on their back and sides and the creamy white fur on the throat, chest and belly. The weasel The weasel is the smallest of the small mustelids and the smallest of all the carnivores. It has short legs and a slender body (17-24cm). The fur is chestnut brown on the back and head with a creamy white belly, and the division between brown and cream is irregular and spotted. This irregular pattern is different for each animal so can be used to identify individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Cycle of the Steppe Polecat (Mustela Eversmanni) R
    Reproductive cycle of the steppe polecat (Mustela eversmanni) R. A. Mead, S. Neirinckx and N. M. Czekala Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83843, USA; and * Research Department, Zoological Society of San Diego, San Diego, California 92112, USA Summary. In laboratory conditions, in a natural photoperiod, testicular redevelopment began in late December. Maximal testis size was attained by the end of February. Testicular regression began in mid-May and was complete by the end of August. Oestrus was first observed in late March and continued throughout April. Females mated for the first time between 30 March and 8 April. Mating generally coincided with peak concentrations of urinary oestrone conjugates and when vaginal lavages con- tained >90% cornified epithelial cells. Blastocyst implantation occurred by Day 13 and the post-implantation period was 29 days. Gestation ranged from 39 to 43 days and first parturition occurred in mid-May. Concentrations of urinary oestrone conju- gates and free progesterone were elevated during the first half of pregnancy, reaching maximum values at mid-pregnancy, and then gradually declined as parturition neared. Litter size of primiparous females averaged 6\p=n-\8young/female. Females that were pseu- dopregnant or lost their litters shortly after birth, and several with weaned kits, exhibited a second oestrus. Keywords: steppe polecat; oestrous cycle; testis; pregnancy; urinary steroids Introduction The steppe polecat (Mustela eversmanni) occupies the plains of the USSR, Romania, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, and eastern China. Wild populations of all 3 species of ferrets are in decline throughout much of their range and the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes), to which the steppe polecat is most closely related (O'Brien et ai, 1989), is near extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Mustelids (Mustelidae)
    Volume 54(21):307‑313, 2014 ON THE CORRECT NAME FOR SOME SUBFAMILIES OF MUSTELIDAE (MAMMALIA, CARNIVORA) FABIO OLIVEIRA DO NASCIMENTO1,2 ABSTRACT Mustelids (Mustelidae) exhibit a wide morphological and ecological diversity, ranging from aquatic to semi arboreal and fossorial forms. It is the most diversity family in Carnivora, and this has promoted a great number of taxonomic arrangements for subfamilies, which can range from two to 15 depending on the author. The relatively recent use of molecular data has helped to elucidate the classification of mustelids, and eight subfamilies are currently recog- nized: Mustelinae, Galictinae, Helictidinae, Martinae, Melinae, Mellivorinae, Taxidiinae and Lutrinae. However, some of these subfamilies have nomenclatural problems, not receiving the oldest available name. The subfamily that includes martens (Martes, Charronia and Pe- kania), tayra (Eira) and wolverine (Gulo) has received the name of Martinae Wagner, 1841, but the oldest available name is Guloninae Gray, 1825. This problem also occurs for the sub- family that includes the grisons (Galictis), Patagonian weasel (Lyncodon), marbled polecat (Vormela) and striped weasels (Ictonyx and Poecilogale), which are known as Grisoninae Pocock, 1921, but the correct name for this group is Ictonychinae, Pocock, 1921. The subfam- ily that includes ferret badgers (Melogale) retains the name Helictidinae Gray, 1865, because its validity is not affected when the type-genus of the subfamily becomes a junior synonym of another genus. Furthermore, a list of the extant subfamilies of Mustelidae and their respective synonyms and included genera is provided. Key-Words: Mustelidae; Subfamilies; Guloninae; Ictonychinae; Helictinae. INTRODUCTION semi-fossorial and fossorial species (Larivière & Jen- nings, 2009).
    [Show full text]