STATE of INDIANA Matthew E. Welsh, Governor DEPARTMENT OF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STATE of INDIANA Matthew E. Welsh, Governor DEPARTMENT OF STATE OF INDIANA Matthew E. Welsh, Governor DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Donald E. Foltz, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John B. Patton, State Geologist Bloomington Special Report No. 1 UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF NATURAL GAS IN INDIANA by T. A. Dawson and G. L. Carpenter Printed by authority of the State of Indiana BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA November 1963 For sale by Geological Survey, Indiana Department of Conservation, Bloomington, Ind. Price 50 cents - SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN B. PATTON, State Geologist MAURICE E. BIGGS. Assistant State Geologist MARY BETH FOX, Mineral Statistician COAL SECTION GEOPHYSICS SECTION CHARLES E. W1ER, Geologist and Head MAURICE E. BIGGS, Geophysicist and Head S. A. FRIEDMAN, Geologist ROBERT F. BLAKELY, Geophysicist HAROLD C. HUTCHISON, Geologist CHARLES S, MILLER, Instrument Maker HOWARD W. LEE, Paleobotanist ALBERT J. RUDMAN, Geophysicist RICHARD L. POWELL, Geologist JOSEPH F. WHALEY, Geophysicist WILLIAM C. RICHARDSON, Geological Assistant CLARENCE HASKINS, Driller WAYNE COX, Assistant Driller ARTHUR WA YNE AYNES, Geophysical Assistant DRAFTING AND PHOTOGRAPHY SECTION WILLIAM H. MOHAN, Chief Draftsman INDUSTRIAL MINEHALS SECTION ROBERT E. JUDAH, Geological Artist-Draftsman BETTY MARZAN, Geological Draftsman LAWRENCE F. ROONEY, Geologist and Head JOHN E. PEACE, Senior Geological Draftsman DONALD D. CARR, Geologist GEORGE R. RINGER, Photogl'spher ROBERT R. FRENCH, Geologist JACK A. SUNDERMAN, Geologist EDUCATIONAL SERVlCES PETROLEUM SECTION R. DEE RARICK, Geologist and Head T. A. DAWSON, Geologist and Head LEROY E. BECKER, Geologist GEOCHEMISTRY SECTION G. L. CARPENTER, Geologist ANDREW J. HREHA, Geologist R. K. LEININGER, Geochemist and Head STANLEY KELLER, Geologist MAYNARD E. COLLER, Chemist HOWARD SMITH, Geologist JACK L. HARRISON, X-ray Mineralogist DAN M. SULLIVAN,Geologist MA MA LAY SEIN. Spectrographer G. A. ABBOTT, Geological Assistant LOUIS V. MILLER, Coal Chemist JAMES T. CAZEE, Geological Assistant E. M. CRAIG. Geochemical Assistant PHILLIP W. CAZEE, Geological Assistant JOHN R. HELMS, Geological Assistant GEOLOGY SECTION ROBERT H. SHAVER, PaleontolOgist and Head HENRY H. GRAY, Head Stratlgrapher PUBLICATIONS SECTION WILLIAM J. WAYNE, Head Glacial Geologist ALLAN F. SCHNEIDER, Glacial Geologist GERALD S. WOODARD, Editor and Head CARL B. REXROAD. Paleontologist LEW1S W. NELLINGER, Sales and Record Clel'k CONTENTS 3 Page Page Abstract ----------------- 5 Laconia project -- 16 Introduction -------------------- 5 Lawrenceburg project ----------- 17 Reason for underground gas Leesville project ------------- 17 storage ----------- -------- 5 Linkville project -------- 17 Who stores gas - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 Linton project ----------- 17 Status of gas storage development Lonetree project ------------ 18 in Indiana - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 Loogootee project ------------- 18 Acknowledgments - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 Oaktown project -------------- 18 Factors influencing the location of gas Oliver project ------------ 18 storage development in Indiana - - - - - - 8 Royal Center project ------------ 18 Regional geology - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 Unionport project -------------- 19 Entrapments ----------- 10 Unionville project ------------ 19 Porous strata --------------- 12 Westpoint project -------------- 19 Availability of subsurface Wilfred project ---------- 20 information ----------------- 13 Worthington project ------- 20 Gas storage projects in Indiana ------- 14 Gas storage possibilities in Indiana ---- 20 Alford project ----- 14 Pennsylvanian and MisSissippian Giro East project -------------- 14 Systems ------------------ 20 Glendale North project ----------- 14 Devonian and Silurian Systems ----- 23 Green Hill project ------------- 14 Ordovician and Cambrian Systems -- 27 Greensburg project ------------- 16 Conclusions ---------------- 28 Howesville project ------------ 16 Selected bibliography ------------- 28 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1. Maps of gas storage projects in Indiana ----------------------- In pocket Page Figure 1. Map of Indiana showing counties ----------------- -------------- 6 2. Map of Indiana showing gas pipelines, storage projects, and consuming centers ----------------------------------------------- 7 3. Graph showing total gas storage projects in Indiana by years - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 4. Generalized bedrock map of Indiana - - - - - - - 9 5. Map of Indiana showing regional structure on top of the Knox Dolomite ------- 10 6. Map of Indiana showing regional structure on top of the Trenton Limestone ---- 10 7. Map of Indiana showing regional structure on top of the Devonian carbonate sequence - --------- 12 8. Map of Indiana showing regional structure on top of the Cypress Formation --- 12 9. Map showing outcrop and subsurface distribution of the Geneva Dolomite in Indiana ----------------------------------------------- 13 10. Map of Indiana showing stratigraphic position and ownership of gas storage projects-- --------------- -------------- -------- 15 4 ILLUSTRATIONS Page - Figure 11. Map of Indiana showing areas of oil production --------------------- 21 12. Map of Indiana showing areas of gas production ---------- ----- 22 13. Map showing structure of Mt. Carmel Fault region, south-central Indiana ---- 25 14. Map showing location of reef structures in west-central Indiana ----------- 26 TABLES Page Table 1. Stratigraphic position of natural gas reservoirs and gas storage reservoirs in Indiana ----------------------------------- 11 2. Statistical summary of gas storage projects in Indiana ------------- facing 14 UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF NATURAL GAS IN INDIANA 1 r By T. A. Dawson and G. L. Carpenter ABSTRACT with the problem of trying to transmit gas cross country at uniform rates to a consumer Underground gas storage is the practical public that cannot use it at uniform rates. means of making available the increased sup­ Three media have been employed to overcome plies of natural gas that are needed in Indiana this problem. in winter periods of peak demand. To date, Where considerable quantities of natural 21 gas storage projects providing an estimated gas have been developed locally, these may storage capacity of 48 billion cubic feet have be used to supplement transmission line gas been initiated. Expansion of storage capac­ supplies in winter periods of peak demand. ity is anticipated. Unfortunately, not many areas of the Midwest Basic geologic factors and availability of have appreciable quantities of locally devel­ subsurface information make establishment oped natural gas. Indiana has very little, its of gas storage in the Illinois Basin much gas production being only a fraction of a per­ easier than in the Michigan Basin or on the cent of the total gas used, Cincinnati Arch. Within the Illinois Basin, A second medium that has been used to storage possibilities are good in the area in overcome the problem of uniform gas trans­ which Pennsylvanian and Mississippian rocks mission versus nonuniform gas demand is contain oil and gas and are excellent in the makeup gas, that is, coke gas and liquified Geneva Dolomite belt. Throughout Indiana petroleum gas, The use of makeup gas to reservoir conditions inOrdovician and Cam­ meet peak winter demands, however, is sel­ brian rocks are adequate for gas storage, but dom completely satisfactorybecause of costs. known significant entrapments in these rocks Not infrequently makeup gas costs more than are few. the price for which it is sold. The third medium used to overcome the discord between gas supply and gas demand INTRODUCTION is underground gas storage. Underground gas storage consists of stockpiling cross­ REASON FOR UNDERGROUND GAS STORAGE countrytransmission line gas in the proxim­ ity of consuming areas when demand is low, Most gas consumed in the Midwest is primarily in summer months, and using this transported cross country from the Midcon­ stockpiled gas when demand is high, primar­ tinent and Gulf Coast by pipelines. Cross­ ily in winter months. For much of the Mid­ country gas transmission pipelines, with at­ west, stockpiling transmission line gas in tendant compressor installations and other natural underground reservoirs is the only needs, require vast capital outlays. These practical means of overcoming the supply­ costly transmission systems need to be used demand discord. In Indiana, with its meager proficiently if transmission costs are not to supplies of native naturalgas and many urban become a burdensome part of the price paid gas-consuming centers, underground gas for gas by the consumer. They need to be storage has become a primary concern of the used continuously at near maximum capacity; gas industry. they need to be used in the summer as' well as in the winter. But consumer demand for WHO STORES GAS natural gas is particularly variable in the Midwest because the temperature spread is Normally two types of gas companies pro­ great and because much of the gas consumed vide service in moving gas from the Midcon­ is used for home heating; gas consumption on tinent and Gulf Coast fields to the Midwest a cold winter day may be several times as consumer. One is the gas transmission com­ much as on an average day and many times pany' and the other is the gas distribution as much as on a warm summer day. Thus company; the services of each are totally the gas industry in the Midwest is confronted complimentary to the other. The transmis­ 1 As of October 10, 1961. 5 6 UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF NATURAL GAS IN INDIANA sion company transmits gas
Recommended publications
  • Reflection Seismic Profiling of the Wabash Valley Fault System in the Illinois Basin
    Reflection Seismic Profiling of the Wabash Valley Fault System in the Illinois Basin U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1538-0 MISSOURI ~"3t3fc: «tr- ^t-i. ARKANSAS Cover. Gray, shaded-relief map of magnetic anomaly data. Map area includes parts of Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Arkansas. Illumination is from the west. Figure is from Geophysical setting of the Reelfoot rift and relations between rift structures and the New Madrid seismic zone, by Thomas G. Hildenbrand and John D. Hendricks (chapter E in this series). Reflection Seismic Profiling of the Wabash Valley Fault System in the Illinois Basin By R.M. Rene and F.L. Stanonis INVESTIGATIONS OF THE NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE Edited by Kaye M. Shedlock and Arch C. Johnston U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1538-O This research was jointly supported by the U.S. Geological Survey and ARPEX (Industrial Associates' Research Program in Exploration Seismology—Indiana University, University of Southern Indiana, Indiana Geological Survey) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rene, R.M. Reflection seismic profiling of the Wabash Valley fault system in the Illinois Basin / by R.M. Rend and F.L. Stanonis. p. cm.—(U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • X Hydrogeologic Framework and Geochemistry of Ground Water
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 02-4123 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, SOUTHERN DIVISION, SHEET 1 of 3 NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND Taylor. C.J., and Hostettler, F.D., 2002, Hydrogeologic Framework and Geochemistry of Ground Water and Petroleum in the Silurian-Devonian Carbonate Aquifer, South-Central Louisville, Kentucky science USGSfor a changing world INTRODUCTION (A) (B) (C) (D) Previously published investigations concerning the ground-water resources HOLE DIAMETER, ACOUSTIC HOLE DIAMETER. ACOUSTIC HOLE DIAMETER. ACOUSTIC HOLE DIAMETER, ACOUSTIC of the city of Louisville and Jefferson County, Kentucky, have mostly focused on IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER the highly productive Ohio River alluvial aquifer (Rorabaugh, 1956; Walker, 1957; Bell. 1966: Unthank and others, 1995). In contrast, relatively little attention has been given to the Ordovician and Silurian-Devonian carbonate aquifers that 10h X 10.4 underlie much of the Louisville and Jefferson County area (fig. I) because of their limited potential for water-supply development (Palmquist and Hall, 1960). LLJ LU O O However, detailed information about the ground-water quality and hydrogeology of £ the carbonate aquifer is needed by State and Federal environmental regulators and o: a: ^ ID private consultants for planning and conducting local environmental t,ite 5% CO C/3 t. * assessments and ground-water remediation. The Silurian-Devonian carbonate Q Q aquifer is of particular interest because it underlies much of the urbanized and 40;: 72%- industrialized areas of the city of Louisville, exhibits moderately well-developed NF karst, and is potentially vulnerable to human-induced contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Charts Showing Biostratigraphic Zones, and Correlations Based on Conodonts from the Devonian and Mississippian Rocks of the Upper Mississippi Valley
    14. GS: C.2 ^s- STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION SIX CHARTS SHOWING BIOSTRATIGRAPHIC ZONES, AND CORRELATIONS BASED ON CONODONTS FROM THE DEVONIAN AND MISSISSIPPIAN ROCKS OF THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY Charles Collinson Alan J. Scott Carl B. Rexroad ILLINOIS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LIBRARY AUG 2 1962 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY URBANA 1962 CIRCULAR 328 I I co •H co • CO <— X c = c P o <* CO o CO •H C CD c +» c c • CD CO ft o e c u •i-CU CD p o TJ o o co CO TJ <D CQ x CO CO CO u X CQ a p Q CO *» P Mh coc T> CD *H O TJ O 3 O o co —* o_ > O p X <-> cd cn <d ^ JS o o co e CO f-l c c/i X ex] I— CD co = co r CO : co *H U to •H CD r I .h CO TJ x X CO fc TJ r-< X -P -p 10 co C => CO o O tJ CD X5 o X c c •> CO P <D = CO CO <H X> a> s CO co c %l •H CO CD co TJ P X! h c CD Q PI CD Cn CD X UJ • H 9 P CD CD CD p <D x c •—I X Q) p •H H X cn co p £ o •> CO o x p •>o C H O CO "P CO CO X > l Ct <-c . a> CD CO X •H D. CO O CO CM (-i co in Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Omaha Pool and Mica-Periodotite Intrusives, Gallatin County, Illinois
    lb 14.GS: RPI 130 c. 2 STATE OF ILLINOIS DWIGHT H. GREEN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION FRANK G. THOMPSON, Director DIVISION OF THE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. M. LEIGHTON, Chief URBANA REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS—NO. 130 OMAHA POOL AND MICA-PERIDOTITE INTRUSIVES, GALLATIN COUNTY, ILLINOIS BY R. M. ENGLISH and R. M. GROGAN Reprinted from STRUCTURE OF TYPICAL AMERICAN OIL FIELDS, VOLUME III Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. (April, 1948), pp, 189-212 PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS 1948 ORGANIZATION STATE OF ILLINOIS HON. DWIGHT H. GREEN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION HON. FRANK G. THOMPSON. Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION HON. FRANK G. THOMPSON, Chairman W. H. NEWHOUSE, Ph.D., Geology ROGER ADAMS, Ph.D., D.Sc, Chettiistry LOUIS R. HOWSON, C.E., Engineering A. E. EMERSON, Ph.D., Biology LEWIS H. TIFFANY, Ph.D., Forestry GEORGE D. STODDARD, Ph.D., Litt.D.. LL.D., L.H.D. » President of the University of Illinois GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION M. M. LEIGHTON, Ph.D., Chief (53430-2M) SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION 100 Natural Resources DuUding, Urbana M. M. LEIGHTON, Ph.D., Chief Enid Townley, M.S., Assistant to the Chief Helen E. McMorris, Secretary to the Chief Velda a. Millard, Junior Asst. to the Chief Elizabktii Stephens, B.S., Geological Assistant GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES GEOCHEMISTRY Arthur Bevan, Ph.D., D.Sc, Principal Geologist in Frank H. Reed, P H.D., Chief Chemist Charge Gkace C. Johnson, B.S., Research Assistant Coal Coal G. H. Cady, Ph.JJ., Senior Geologist and Head G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devonian Limestones of Central Ohio and Southern Indiana
    184 The Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. VII, No. 8, THE DEVONIAN LIMESTONES OF CENTRAL OHIO AND SOUTHERN INDIANA. CLINTON R. STAUFFER. A comparative study of the two regions, lying on opposite sides of the Cincinnati island, shows that there is a. remarkable similarity between the Devonian limestones of central Ohio and southern Indiana. This is perhaps more evident from a litholog- ical point of view although the paleontology of the formations of the two places is very similar and the stratigraphic arrange- ment is identical. These deposits in Ohio have been divided into the Columbus and Delaware limestones. The Columbus presents two very different lithological phases which are persistent throughout the state. In southern Indiana Dr. Edward M. Kindle has recog- nized three distinct formations, the Geneva and Jeffersonville limestones and the Sellersburg beds,1 the latter including the Silver Creek hydraulic limestone of some authors. The lower of these Indiana formations, stratigraphic ally, is the Geneva limestone which "is generally a massive light buff to chocolate brown saccharoidal magnesian limestone" in which "fossils are extremely rare at most locations and occur usually as casts when found."2 It thins out toward the Ohio river but may be seen in the vicinity of Charleston, along the hill above the "Lick" and at the road side east of town. In Ohio the lower thirty-five to forty feet of the Columbus limestone answers admirably to the above description. It is usually a porous brown limestone high in its percentage of mag- nesium carbonate. The bedding is irregular and frequently almost wanting. Oblique jointing, although not necessarily characteristic, is common.
    [Show full text]
  • B2150-B FRONT Final
    Bedrock Geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri By W. John Nelson THE PADUCAH CUSMAP QUADRANGLE: RESOURCE AND TOPICAL INVESTIGATIONS Martin B. Goldhaber, Project Coordinator T OF EN TH TM E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2150–B R I A N P T E E R D . I O S . R A joint study conducted in collaboration with the Illinois State Geological U Survey, the Indiana Geological Survey, the Kentucky Geological Survey, and the Missouri M 9 Division of Geology and Land Survey A 8 4 R C H 3, 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nelson, W. John Bedrock geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Ken- tucky, and Missouri / by W. John Nelson. p. cm.—(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2150–B) (The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.3:2150–B 1. Geology—Middle West. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B QE75.B9 no. 2150–B [QE78.7] [557.3 s—dc21 97–7724 [557.7] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Resources of Fluorine in the United States
    Geology and Resources of Fluorine in the United States GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 933 COVER PHOTOGRAPHS 1. Asbestos ore 8. Aluminum ore, bauxite, Georgia 1 2 3 4 2. Lead ore, Balmat mine, N . Y. 9. Native copper ore, Keweenawan 5 6 3. Chromite-chromium ore, Washington Peninsula, Mich. 4. Zinc ore, Friedensville, Pa. 10. Porphyry molybdenum ore, Colorado 7 8 5. Banded iron-formation, Palmer, 11. Zinc ore, Edwards, N. Y. Mich. 12. Manganese nodules, ocean floor 9 10 6. Ribbon asbestos ore, Quebec, Canada 13. Botryoidal fluorite ore, Poncha Springs, Colo. 11 12 13 14 7. Manganese ore, banded rhodochrosite 14. Tungsten ore, North Carolina Geology and Resources of Fluorine in the United States Edited by DANIEL R. SHAWE With sections by D. R. SHAWE, R. E. VAN ALSTINE, R. G. WORL, A. V. HEYL, R. D. TRACE, R. L. PARKER, W. R. GRIFFITTS, C. L. SAINSBURY, and J. B. CATHCART GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 933 An evaluation of the geochemistry, geographic distribution, and geologic environments of fluorine, and descriptions of major United States fluorine mineral deposits UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 76-600061 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02901-4 APPRAISAL OF MINERAL RESOURCES Continuing appraisal of the mineral resources of the United States is conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey in accordance with the provisions of the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-631, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Welge-Bg.Pdf (2.59
    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF WELGE QUADRANGLE Illinois Department of Natural Resources Illinois Geologic Quadrangle Map ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RANDOLPH AND JACKSON COUNTIES, ILLINOIS IGQ Welge-BG William W. Shilts, Chief W. John Nelson 2007 Mk & e" 175 e" 84 sm o3 h &cv 164k" 170 k" k" 262 ^ ^ þ þüþü þ 2o o &c &s 250 h o 3 250 9 970 e" &cv -1 351e" Sª 00 136 k820 200 k" &t 62 k" 1 5 0 5 -5 N 0 J N 1 123 0 N J 757 0 e" J N N 0 J J N ª J N 0 350 J N oN J k" 87 k" Mc J S 377N 45 J k" 162 136 Mk NJ 165 N k 161 e" e" J 226 N J e" k" N S 677 J k Mk 161 145k" k"161 GS S 849 398 163 N 250 N 55 e" J k k J e" e" e" 142 k"164 172 S 395 143 k" Md S 411 i N k"142 J N N 130 k" ª J J NJ NJ NJ N N S J J N N 486 J J NJ N N J J NJ N 300 ª J N MASTER FAULT, J N &t k"46 COTTAGE GROVE FAULT SYSTEM J NJ N 205 Md 143 J 250 135 k" S k" k" N k" 41 k" k372 J 103 NJ 20 164 " 104 k k" N 0 15 J e" 248 0 EXPLANATION 150 e" e" 138 256 160 e" 5 k" 204k" k" 10 0 449 201 k" 0 350 k" 60 225 k" k"123 211 182 k" J N &cv sm Surface-mined area " k" 142 133 e k" 122 ª 150 k" 150 610 k" 150k" N e" J k" 200 &s Shelburn Formation 205 N k" J 136 k" 15 k" 0 146 142 Mk k" 282 h N k" S J 151e" ª k"153 k" &c Carbondale Formation 759 190 Desmoinesian J G 2165 N N Ü Mp J ª h, Herrin Coal Member N Mc 258 Pennsylvanian J k" N J k"123 N J J &t Tradewater Formation N &cv N J N J &cv N Md 205 J Unconformity k" N 25 J e"175 Md J N 0 J N N N J Morrowan J &cv Caseyville Formation Mps 30 Md N 730 k" J J o G N 152 N J k" N Unconformity N J J 110 " Sk e" k e" S 154 202 " k"164 S 724 e" k k" 129
    [Show full text]
  • Miospore Taxonomy and Stratigraphy of Upper Devonian and Lowermost Carboniferous in Western Pomerania (Nw Poland)
    Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae (2002), vol. 72: 163-190. MIOSPORE TAXONOMY AND STRATIGRAPHY OF UPPER DEVONIAN AND LOWERMOST CARBONIFEROUS IN WESTERN POMERANIA (NW POLAND) Marzena STEMPIEN-SALEK Polish Academy o f Sciences, Institute o f Geological Sciences, ul. Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] Stempien-Salek, M., 2002. Miospore taxonomy and stratigraphy of Upper Devonian and lowermost Carboniferous in western Pomerania (NW Poland). Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 72: 163-190. Abstract: Five local miospore zones, six subzones and two assemblages are distinguished for the Frasnian to lower Toumaisian deposits in the Kolobrzeg region (western Pomerania): assemblage I, Membrabaculisporis radiatus-Tholisporites densus (RD), Membrabaculisporis radiatus-Cymbosporites boafeticus (RB), Lagenoispo- rites immensus-Diducites poljessicus (IP) Zone, assemblage II, Tumulispora rarituberculata (Ra) and Convolu- tispora major (Ma) Zone. The first three biozones and the two assemblages are new in this region. The local miospores zones distinguished in western Pomerania are correlated with the European standard miospore and conodont zonations. Two new miospore species and one new variety are described, two species is emended. Key words: Frasnian, Famennian, lowermost Carboniferous, NW Poland, miospores, stratigraphy. Manuscript recdeived 6 November 2001, accepted 13 June 2002 INTRODUCTION PREVIOUS PALYNOLOGICAL STUDIES OF UPPER DEVONIAN AND LOWER The main purpose of this study was to determine, using CARBONIFEROUS OF WESTERN palynological methods, the stratigraphical position of the POMERANIA Człuchów, Kłanino, Sąpolno Calcareous Shale, and Gozd Arkose formations of western Pomerania. The zones of the The earliest results of palynological studies concerning miospore zonal scheme for Famennian and Lower Carbon­ the Devonian-Carboniferous succession of western Pome­ iferous of that area established by Tumau (1978, 1979) are rania were published in the seventies of the twenty century.
    [Show full text]
  • Airphoto Interpretation of Engineering Soils of Interstate Route I-64
    AIRPHOTO INTERPRETATION OF ENGINEERING SOILS OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 64 BETWEEN SCALESVILLE AND NEW ALBANY IN WARRICK, SPENCER, DUBOIS, PERRY, CRAWFORD, HARRISON AND FLOYD COUNTIES, INDIANA SEPTEMBER 1965 NO. 24 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS members and Sloan Foundation; Indiana Department of Transportation http://www.archive.org/details/airphotointerpre6524yehp Progress Report AIRPHOTO INTERPRETATION OF EKGIMEERIKG SOILS INTERSTATE ROUTE 1-64? BETWEEN SCALESVILLE AND NEW ALBANY IN WARRICK, SPENCER, DUBOIS, PERSY, CRAWFORD, HARRISON AND FLOYD COUNTIES, INDIANA Tos G. A. Leonards, Director Joint Highway Research Project September 24, 1965 Frooj H. L Michael, Associate Director Files 1-5-5 Joint Highway Research Project Project: C-36-51E The steadied report entitled "Airphoto Interpretation of Engineering Soils of Interstate Route 1-64 between Scalesville and New Albany in Warrick, Spencer, Dubois, Perry, Crawford, Harrison and Floyd Counties, Indiana," completes the project concerned with engineering soils napping of the Interstate system from aerial photographs This project was prepared as a part of an investigation conducted by Joint Highway Research Project in cooperation with the Indiana State Highway Coaaisslon, the Bureau of Public Roadn and the Soil Conservation Service. The report was prepared by P. T. Yeh Research Engineer, Joint Highway Research Project The soil mapping of 1-64 between Scslesville and flew Albany was done entirely by airphoto interpretation technique To Increase the value, the soil strip nap was prepared on a photographic base with annotation to show soil areas The generalized soil profiles were .prepared from the available literature. Respectfully submitted. ?/? 7*~A~S H. L.
    [Show full text]
  • 105Th Annual Report of the State Geologist
    105TH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST of INDIANA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES for July 1, 1980 - June 30, 1981 1 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST PERSONNEL Permanent Personnel Administration John B. Patton. • • . .•.•.State Geologist Maurice E. Biggs. .Assistant State Geologist Mary E. Fox • . • • • Mineral Statistician E. Coleen George. .Principal Secretary Coal and Industrial Minerals Section Dona ld D. Carr. • • • • . Geologist and Head Curtis H. Ault •• Geologist and Associate Head Pei-Yuan Chen • • • • .Geologist (To January 2, 1981) Donald L. Eggert. .Geologist Gordon S. Fraser. • .Geologist Denver Harper . • • • • . .Geologist Nancy R. Hasenmueller . Geologist (From February 2, 1981) Walter A. Hasenmueller•• • . •Geologist Nelson R. Shaffer • · . • . .Geologist Paul Irwin. • • Geological Assistant Janet Roller.. · .....Secretary Kathryn Shaffer . · . • • . Secretary Drafting and Photography Section William H. Moran. \I • • • . • . Chief Draftsman and Head Richard T. Hill • . .••Senior Geological Draftsman Roger L. Purcell. .Senior Geological Draftsman George R. Ringer. • • . • • • • Photographer Wilbur E. Stalions. .Geological Artist-Draftsman Educational Services Reevan Dee Rarick . • • • • . • . • • • • . .Geologist Geochemistry Section Richard K. Leininger. • .Geochemist and Head Margaret V. Golde · Instrument Analyst Joseph G. Hailer•.•. · . • . Geochemist 2 Jesse Hardin. · ••E1ectronic Technician (From September 29. 1980) Roger S. McCay .. .E1ectronic Technician
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of the Chester Series in the Illinois Basin
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository °,'S ,S}*TE If/jltf GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 3 3051 00003 5240 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/studiesofchester91illi STATE OF ILLINOIS DWICHT H. GREEN. Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION FRANK G. THOMPSON. Director DIVISION OF THE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. M. LEIGHTON. Chief URBANA CIRCULAR NO. 9: STUDIES OF THE CHESTER SERIES IN THE ILLINOIS BASIN REPRINTED FROM THE TRANSACTIONS. ILLINOIS STATE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE. VOL. 35. NO. 2. DECEMBER 1942 < 1943) PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA. ILLINOIS 19 4 3 CONTENTS PAGE USE OF THE GLEN DEAN LIMESTONE AS A STRUCTURAL KEY HORIZON IN THE ILLINOIS BASIN By George V. Cohee 5 CHESTER INDEX OSTRACODES By Chalmer L. Cooper 8 SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHIC SECTIONS NEAR TYPE CHESTER LOCALI- TIES IN SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS Bji Frank E. Tippie 9 [3] USE OF THE GLEN DEAN LIMESTONE AS A STRUCTURAL KEY HORIZON IN THE ILLINOIS BASIN 1 GEORGE V. CoHEE" Illinois State Geological Survey, Urbana, Illinois The Glen Dean formation is one of the dicating some structural movement dur- best known formations of the Chester ing late or post-Glen Dean time. series in Illinois. Since 1937 the basal The Glen Dean formation in the Illi- limestone has been used widely as a nois basin is predominantly limestone structural key horizon and as a subsur- with various amounts of shale.
    [Show full text]