DOCSLIB.ORG

COVID-Info-Eng.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

* Covide - 19 rate per 100,000 population on September 15 2021 A negative PCR (not older than 72 h) or negative CONFIRMATION THAT YOU HAVE OVERCOME RAPID ANTIGEN TEST - BAT (not older than 48 CORONAVIRUS INFECTION AND HAVE BEEN hours from the time of testing to arrival at the VACCINATED WITH ONE DOSE OF THE VACCINE border crossing) within six months of the onset of COVID-19 less than 270 days ago. The exemption from the obligation to Vaccination certificate: on receiving two doses present a negative PCR or rapid antigen test or of vaccine received in the EU (Pfizer, Modern, quarantine is extended until six months after AstaZeneca, Gamaleya, Sinopharm) or one dose vaccination. of the vaccine which is received in a single dose (Janssen / Johnson & Johnson) if there are 14 SELF-INSULATION upon arrival in Croatia until the days of receipt of the one dose. Entry into arrival of a negative result of the PCR / BAT test, Croatia for persons from the EU is possible as which you will test after entering Croatia at your own soon as they are vaccinated with the second expense. In case of impossibility of testing, self- dose, ie it is not necessary to pass 14 days isolation lasts for 10 days. from receiving the second dose. CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT OF THE FIRST DOSE CONFIRMATION THAT YOU HAVE RECOVERED OF PFIZER, MODERN OR GAMALEYA (from the 22nd from the coronavirus infection (positive PCR / BAT) to the 42nd day of receipt of the vaccine) OR more than 11 days and less than 270 days from ASTRAZENECA (from the 22nd to the 84th day of the the date of arrival at the border crossing or by first dose of the vaccine) presenting of a certificate of overcoming the disease COVID-19, issued by a doctor * Children under the age of 12 are exempt from the * All submitted tests for the purpose of entering Croatia obligation to present one of the above conditions must be from a common list of rapid antigen tests that if their parents or guardians meet them. are mutually recognized by EU member states. • • • • • • Request a free confirmation in just a few steps if you have been vaccinated, tested negative for coronavirus, or have recently had COVID-19 Information for Information for EU Croatian citizens – citizens – FIND OUT MORE FIND OUT MORE More than 350 testing TEST YOURSELF. locations have been established on which tourists can be tested and checked for coronavirus infection. • Zagreb County • Primorje - Gorski Kotar County • Krapina - Zagorje County • Zadar County • Koprivnica - Križevci County • Šibenik - Knin County • Bjelovar - Bilogora County • Split - Dalmatia County • Virovitica - Podravina County • Istra County • Požega - Slavonija County • Dubrovnik - Neretva • City of Zagreb County • Brod - Posavina County • Vukovar - Syrmia County • Međimurje County • Osijek - Baranja County • Sisak - Moslavina County • Karlovac County • Varaždin County • Lika - Senj County "Dr. Andrija Štampar”, City of 00385 91 4696 444 Osijek – Baranja County 00385 31 225 717 Zagreb Croatian Institute of Public 00385 98 227 753 Požega – Slavonija County 00385 98 9829 204 Central telephone number Health active every day from Primorje – Gorki Kotar Bjelovar – Bilogora County 00385 98 492 024 00385 91 1257 210 County 8:00am to 9:00pm Brod – Posavina County 00385 91 5170 426 00385 98 293 578 Dubrovnik – Neretva County 00385 98 243 454 Sisak – Moslavina County 00385 98 293 576 Karlovac County 00385 98 247 630 00385 98 293 572 00385 99 2455 545 00385 98 9813 273 Krapina – Zagorje County 00385 91 7307 913 Split – Dalmatia County 00385 91 1512 003 00385 91 5103 165 Šibenik – Knin County 00385 91 4341 201 Kopivnica – Križevci County 00385 98 592 215 Varaždin County 00385 99 2119 802 Lika – Senj County 00385 91 5044 917 Vukovar – Syrmia County 00385 91 3704 290 Virovitica – Podravina County 00385 98 465 945 Zadar County 00385 98 332 765 Međimurje County 00385 98 558 811 Zagreb County 00385 99 7368 784 • Through the project, business and customer treatment protocols were designed in all tourism and tourism-related activities. • Stakeholders who follow the prescribed business protocols are awarded Safe Stay in Croatia labels free of charge. • Business and treatment protocols are based on current health and safety recommendations of the Croatian Institute of Public Health and the World Travel and Tourism Council..
Recommended publications
  • Croatia - Bosnia and Herzegovina)

    Croatia - Bosnia and Herzegovina)

    IPA Cross-Border project "Una - Spring of Life" (Croatia - Bosnia and Herzegovina) Prepered by MSc Lamija Abdijevic, Architect Conservator (Expert Advisor at the Institute of Protection of Monuments in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina) Sarajevo, September, 2015 About project The project "Una - Spring of Life" has been chosen for co-financing within the IPA Cross-Border Programme Croatia - Bosnia and Herzegovina 2007-2013. The implementation of the project began in 2011. Partners - The Zadar County, Croatia (it is a self-government regional unit, one of the seven Croatian coastal counties), - The Municipality of Bihać, Bosnia and Herzegovina (it is a self-government unit located in north-western part of Bosnia and Herzegovina, - The Municipality of Gračac, Croatia (it is the largest municipality in Croatia, located in the Zadar County), - Centre for the promotion of local development PLOD, Bosnia and Herzegovina (it is a civic association), - NATURA-JADERE, Croatia (it is a public institution for the management of protected areas in Zadar County), - Zadar County Development Agency – ZADRA, Croatia, - Zadar County Tourist Board, Croatia, - Una-Sana Canton Tourist Board, Bosnia and Herzegovina, - Una Association, Bosnia and Herzegovina (NGO). Associates - The Lika-Senj County Development Agency – LIRA, Croatia, - The Gračac Tourist Board, Croatia. The aim of the project is to jointly develop the Una Spring in Croatia and the Una Waterfalls and the Old Town of Ostrovica in the area of Martin Brod in Bosnia and Herzegovina as a part of the same, environmental- adopted joint tourism product through cross-border cooperation and pooling of various experiences of all stakeholders from the area of the upper course of the Una River.
  • Croatia. 'Virovitica on Cadastral Maps'

    Croatia. 'Virovitica on Cadastral Maps'

    CO-295 VIROVITICA ON CADASTRAL MAPS KICINBACI S. State geodetic administration, VIROVITICA, CROATIA Virovitica is a town in northern Croatia with a population of 15,000. The town is situated in the valley of the Drava river, in the southern part of the Pannonian Basin. The year 1234, when Virovitica was made a free trade town, is regarded the town’s founding year. The regular form of Virovitica indicates that the town was founded on a crossroads of two important traffic routes. The first route runs from the West to the East parallel with the Drava river, which is a tributary to the Danube; the second route runs from the North to the South. Being situated near the Hungarian border Virovitica also has a Hungarian name – Veröcé, which means “a small door”, a name that reminds of that there is a passage there from the Drava river valley to the Sava river valley through the Bilogora mountainous range. Some of the wealthy landowners had made the maps of their own estates even before any systematic survey was done, but these maps are not dealt with in this paper. The subject matter here is the systematic surveys and maps that are the result of the surveys. My wish was to analyse our cartographic heritage and link it with modern technologies. THE 19th CENTURY The Virovitica Town Museum keeps some of the cadastral records from the time of Emperor Joseph II, when the survey of the 18th century locality of Virovitica was carried out. This preserved data does not contain any graphic supplements.
  • Accounting for Regional Poverty Differences in Croatia: Exploring the Role of Disparities in Average Income and Inequality

    Accounting for Regional Poverty Differences in Croatia: Exploring the Role of Disparities in Average Income and Inequality

    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Accounting for regional poverty differences in Croatia: Exploring the role of disparities in average income and inequality Rubil, Ivica The Institute of Economics, Zagreb 16 January 2013 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43827/ MPRA Paper No. 43827, posted 16 Jan 2013 11:16 UTC ACCOUNTING FOR REGIONAL POVERTY DIFFERENCES IN CROATIA: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF DISPARITIES IN AVERAGE INCOME AND INEQUALITY Ivica Rubil The Institute of Economics, Zagreb January 2013 Abstract The prevalence of poverty in a given population is determined by both the level of average income and the shape of income distribution. Accordingly, the difference in poverty between two populations can be attributed to disparities in their average incomes and in the levels of income inequality. In this paper, we decompose the differences in relative poverty between each of the twenty-one Croatian counties and Croatia as a whole into the contributions of the mean income and income inequality, using the Household Budget Survey data for 2010. The decomposition framework that we utilize here is one usually applied for decompositions of intertemporal poverty changes, and is based on the concept of Shapley value from cooperative game theory. Poverty is measured by three conventional measures – the headcount ratio, the poverty gap, and the squared poverty gap – and robustness of the results to switching from one measure to another is discussed. The results of decompositions show that in most cases both the mean income and inequality differences contribute to poverty variation across the counties, relative to poverty in Croatia as a whole. When poverty is measured by the headcount ratio, the income contribution dominates the inequality contribution, while when we switch to the other two measures, which give more weight to poorer among the poor, the inequality contribution starts to dominate.
  • Croatia Page 1 of 20

    Croatia Page 1 of 20

    Country Report on Human Rights Practices in Croatia Page 1 of 20 Croatia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2007 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 11, 2008 The Republic of Croatia is a constitutional parliamentary democracy with a population of 4.4 million. Legislative authority is vested in the unicameral Sabor (parliament). The president serves as head of state and commander of the armed forces, cooperating in formulation and execution of foreign policy and directing operations of the intelligence service; he also nominates the prime minister, who leads the government. Parliamentary elections on November 25 were conducted in accordance with electoral legislation, although out-of-date registers of voters living abroad created a problem. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces. The government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in some areas. The judicial system suffered from a case backlog, although the number of unsolved cases awaiting trial was somewhat reduced. Intimidation of some witnesses in domestic war crimes trials remained a problem. Courts continued to hold in absentia group trials for war crimes in both Vukovar and Rijeka. The government made little progress in restituting property nationalized by the Yugoslav communist regime to non-Roman Catholic religious groups. Societal violence and discrimination against ethnic minorities, particularly Serbs and Roma, remained a problem. Violence and discrimination against women continued. School officials continued to segregate Romani students into substandard schools. Trafficking in persons, violence and discrimination against homosexuals, and discrimination against persons with HIV/AIDS were also reported.
  • Neolithisation of Sava-Drava-Danube Interfluve at the End of the 6600–6000 BC Period of Rapid Climate Change> a New Solutio

    Neolithisation of Sava-Drava-Danube Interfluve at the End of the 6600–6000 BC Period of Rapid Climate Change> a New Solutio

    Documenta Praehistorica XLIII (2016) Neolithisation of Sava-Drava-Danube interfluve at the end of the 6600–6000 BC period of Rapid Climate Change> a new solution to an old problem Katarina Botic´ Institute of Archaeology, Zagreb, CR [email protected] ABSTRACT – The idea of the Neolithisation of the Sava-Drava-Danube interfluve has undergone very little change since S. Dimitrijevi≤'s time. Despite their many shortcomings, new archaeological exca- vations and radiocarbon dates of Early Neolithic sites have provided us with new insight into the process of Neolihisation of this region. Using the recently published work by B. Weninger and L. Clare (Clare, Weninger 2010; Weninger et al. 2009; Weninger et al. 2014) as a starting point, the available radiocarbon and archaeological data are used to build up a time frame comparable to the wider region of Southeast Europe and climate conditions for specific period. The results fit the model of Neolithisation well (Weninger et al. 2014.9, Fig. 4), filling in the geographical gaps. IZVLE∞EK – Premise o neolitizaciji v medre≠ju Save, Drave in Donave se od ≠asa S. Dimitrijevi≤a niso veliko spremenile. Nova arheolo∏ka izkopavanja in radiokarbonski datumi zgodnjega neolitika so, kljub mnogim pomanjkljivostim, prinesli nove vpoglede v proces neolitizacije na tem obmo≠ju. Za os- novo pri interpretaciji smo uporabili nedavno objavljena dela B. Weningerja in L. Clarea (Clare, We- ninger 2010; Weninger et al. 2009; Weninger et al. 2014), dosegljive radiokarbonske datume in arheo- lo∏ke podatke pa smo uporabili za izdelavo ≠asovnega okvirja, ki je primerljiv s ∏ir∏im obmo≠jem ju- govzhodne Evrope in s klimatskimi pogoji za posamezna obdobja.
  • Obstacles to Cross-Border Cooperation – Case of Croatia and Hungary

    Obstacles to Cross-Border Cooperation – Case of Croatia and Hungary

    European Journal of Geography Volume 9, Number 2: 116-133, June 2018 ©Association of European Geographers OBSTACLES TO CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION – CASE OF CROATIA AND HUNGARY Sanja TIŠMA Institute for Development and International Relations, IRMO, Zagreb, Croatia [email protected] Krešimir JURLIN Institute for Development and International Relations, IRMO, Zagreb, Croatia [email protected] Helena ČERMAK Institute for Development and International Relations, IRMO, Zagreb, Croatia [email protected] Abstract The focus of this paper is to identify most significant obstacles that hinder bilateral trade between Hungary and Croatia and propose solutions for improvements by using the gravity models, precisely the Newtonian model of gravitation. The results of the research show that in spite of interest for cross-border cooperation being expressed by the stakeholders from both sides of the border, Somogy County and Virovitica-Podravina County belong to less developed, deprived rural areas of Hungary and Croatia. The key weaknesses for cross-border cooperation include lack of transport connections and language barrier, while strengths reflect in entrepreneurial spirit and opportunity to apply and implement joint entrepreneurial projects financed by the European Union (EU) funds. Keywords: Cross-border cooperation, Croatia and Hungary, gravity models, entrepreneurship, transport infrastructure, EU funds 1. INTRODUCTION When considering bilateral trade, often the crucial question is what trade intensity shall be considered as appropriate or "normal". It has been known since the work of Tinbergen (1962) and Poyhonen (1963) that the size of bilateral trade flows between any two countries can be approximated by a law called the gravity equation which originates from the Newtonian theory of gravitation.
  • AMAZON of EUROPE BIKE TRAIL Output 3.1 Socio-Economic Analysis of Tourism Potentials

    AMAZON of EUROPE BIKE TRAIL Output 3.1 Socio-Economic Analysis of Tourism Potentials

    AMAZON OF EUROPE BIKE TRAIL Output 3.1 Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) DTP2-002-2.2 AOE BIKE TRAIL Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Project AoE Bike Trail, DTP2-002-2.2 Work package: WP3: Product development Output Output 3.1 Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials Authors Anja Krajnik, Urška Dolinar, Tatjana Marn Institution Iskriva, Institute for Development of Local Potentials Date April 2019 Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Acknowledgment We would like to thank all participants who actively contributed with their inputs and comments during preparation of the Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials of the Amazon of Europe area: Municipality of Velika Polana (Damijan Jaklin, Nina Lebar) WWF Austria (Stefanie Edelmüller, Arno Mohl) Trail Angels (Günter Mussnig, Rudi Trinko) Tourism Association Bad Radkersburg (Belinda Schagerl-Poandl, Christian Contola) Tourism Board Međimurje (Petra Murković, Iva Vurušić Mađarić, Rudi Grula) Public instituton for nature protection of Virovitca-Podravina County (Tatjana Arnold Sabo, Sabina Hranic, Antun Damjan) Public Institution County Development Agency of Osijek-Baranja County (Adela Sadiković, Ivana Kišćinal) Koprivnica Križevci County (Vladimir Šadek, Emilija Cvelber, Snježana Babok Grgić) WWF Adria (Ivana Korn Varga, Ana Kuzmanić, Lana Jurić) West-Pannon RDA Ltd. (Ádám Bolyós, Máté Deák, Tibor Polgár, Bejczy Delinke) Balaton-felvidéki Natonal Park Directorate (Csaba
  • Prometna Povezanost

    Prometna Povezanost

    Tourism Introduction Zadar County encompasses marine area from Island Pag to National Park Kornati and land area of Velebit, i.e. the central part of the Croatian coastline. This is the area of true natural beauty, inhabited from the Antique period, rich with cultural heritage, maritime tradition and hospitality. Zadar County is the heart of the Adriatic and the fulfilment of many sailors' dreams with its numerous islands as well as interesting and clean underwater. It can easily be accessed from the sea, by inland transport and airways. Inseparable unity of the past and the present can be seen everywhere. Natural beauties, cultural and historical monuments have been in harmony for centuries, because men lived in harmony with nature. As a World rarity, here, in a relatively small area, within a hundred or so kilometres, one can find beautiful turquoise sea, mountains covered with snow, fertile land, rough karst, ancient cities and secluded Island bays. This is the land of the sun, warm sea, olives, wine, fish, song, picturesque villages with stone- made houses, to summarise - the true Mediterranean. History of Tourism in Zadar Tourism in Zadar has a long tradition. The historical yearbooks record that in June 1879 a group of excursionists from Vienna visited Zadar, in 1892 the City Beautification Society was founded (active until 1918), and in 1899 the Mountaineering and Tourism Society "Liburnia" was founded. At the beginning of the XX century, in March 1902 hotel Bristol was opened to the public (today's hotel Zagreb). Most important period for the development of tourism in Zadar County lasted from the 60's - 80's of the 20th century, when the majority of the hotel complexes were erected.
  • (Rural) Tourism: a Case Study of Lika-Senj County

    (Rural) Tourism: a Case Study of Lika-Senj County

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Soc. ekol. Zagreb, Vol. 28 (2019.), No. 3 Anita Bušljeta Tonković: (Un)sustainable (Rural) Tourism: A Case Study of Lika-Senj County DOI 10.17234/SocEkol.28.3.3 Preliminary communication UDK 338.48:502(497.5) Received: 4 Oct 2019 502.14(497.5) Accepted: 19 Dec 2019 502.131.1(497.562) (UN)SUSTAINABLE (RURAL) TOURISM: A CASE STUDY OF LIKA-SENJ COUNTY Anita Bušljeta Tonković Institute of social sciences Ivo Pilar, Regional centre Gospić Trg Stjepana Radića 14, 53 000 Gospić e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Sustainable tourism is a carefully planned activity with clear, specifi c and long-term goals that does not cause environmental devastation, and respects the social, ecological, cultural and economic value of the space in which it occurs. Th is paper presents the (un)sustainable rural tourism practice in Lika-Senj County in Croatia through a case study of the Linden Tree Retreat & Ranch and Plitvice Lakes. In order to understand the concepts of sustainable rural tourism, overtourism and undertourism, the case study begins with an analysis of statistical data, secondary literature and examples of overtourism in Lika (Plitvice Lakes Nati- onal Park). Qualitative insight (preliminary data) is used to refl ect on the Linden Tree Retreat & Ranch campaign called CIDER (Community, Integrity, Development, Evolution and Responsibility), which can be considered as the point of departure for the enhancement of undertourism development. Keywords: neo-endogenous development, overtourism, sustainable tourism, undertourism 1. INTRODUCTION1 Tourism is one of the most important social phenomena of the 20th and 21st centuries.
  • Integrated Action Plan City of Zagreb

    Integrated Action Plan City of Zagreb

    Integrated Action Plan City of Zagreb Zagreb, May 2018 Photo: Zagreb Time Machine - M. Vrdoljak Property of The Zagreb Tourist Board Zagreb Economy Snapshot HOME TO ZAGREB 790 017 19,2% GENERATED PEOPLE OF THE CROATIAN 33,4% MEN 48,3% POPULATION OF NATIONAL GDP WOMEN 51,7% LIVE IN ZAGREB TOTAL ZAGREB GDP 14 876 MIL EUR 377 502 1.2 ZAGREB: JOBS, WITH AN MILLION VISITORS BEST CHRISTMAS UNEMPLOYMENT TOTAL IN 2017 MARKET IN EUROPE RATE @ 5,1% 203.865 DOMESTIC VISITORS, 137.160 NON- DOWN FROM EUROPEAN 10% IN 2005 VISITORS SmartImpact: City of Zagreb IAP SmartImpact: City of Zagreb IAP Executive Summary As in most other cities within the URBACT network, the objective and biggest challenge of the urban The funding scheme is based on a combination of existing proven and innovative financing and development of Zagreb is to provide efficient and cost-effective service to citizens and businesses. procurement methods. The majority of the measures in the IAP are also included as measures previously mentioned in other major programmes and plans of City of Zagreb and are being SmartImpact project aims at exploring and developing innovative management tools for financed by the city budget. However, the application for EU funding that has been used before municipalities to finance, build, manage and operate a smart city by developing approaches that will be necessary for the IAP implementation as well. New forms of public-private collaboration for support decision making, investments, management and maintenance of smart solutions to achieve smart city investments and innovation-based procurement are included in IAP measures, actions the city’s development goals.
  • E15 HR NIN the WINTER USE of SUMMER STRATEGY The

    E15 HR NIN the WINTER USE of SUMMER STRATEGY The

    E15 HR NIN THE WINTER USE OF SUMMER STRATEGY The morphology of the terrain on which the town-island formed in the shallow lagoon contributes to the unusual imagery and distinguishes Nin as a town with one of the three salt ponds on the eastern Adriatic coast that have been in operation since ancient times. The rich historical heritage, the proximity of large tourist resorts and the city of Zadar, resulted in the fact that the population of Nin (2,750 inhabitants in winter) explodes fivefold in the summer months (14,000 in the summer), which is a record number in Croatia. Providing only seasonal accommodation facilities, as a support to 'tourist' environment (natural and cultural sights, beaches ...) creates a monofunctional housing ghetto within the city area. In the winter when the surrounding activators disappear and tourists leave, these parts of the city turn into dormitories. Small towns (villages) do not have urban power or social potential to resist the six months of hibernation. Summer modes of community motivated by profit completely disappear in winter. But small towns can be an appropriate place to explore and plan different sustainability models that we can call the winter use of summer strategy. NIN / LOCATION / HISTORICAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT The City of Nin is situated in the lowest and flattest part of agricurtural area between the mountains of Velebit, the Krka River and the sea (the most fertile part of Dalmatia, located in the hinterland of Zadar). The geography of the surrounding area of Nin is characterized by alteration of limestone karst and alluvial deposit, resulting in fertile agricultural land.
  • (Rural) Tourism: a Case Study of Lika-Senj County

    (Rural) Tourism: a Case Study of Lika-Senj County

    Soc. ekol. Zagreb, Vol. 28 (2019.), No. 3 Anita Bušljeta Tonković: (Un)sustainable (Rural) Tourism: A Case Study of Lika-Senj County DOI 10.17234/SocEkol.28.3.3 Preliminary communication UDK 338.48:502(497.5) Received: 4 Oct 2019 502.14(497.5) Accepted: 19 Dec 2019 502.131.1(497.562) (UN)SUSTAINABLE (RURAL) TOURISM: A CASE STUDY OF LIKA-SENJ COUNTY Anita Bušljeta Tonković Institute of social sciences Ivo Pilar Regional centre Gospić Trg Stjepana Radića 14, 53 000 Gospić e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Sustainable tourism is a carefully planned activity with clear, specifi c and long-term goals that does not cause environmental devastation, and respects the social, ecological, cultural and economic value of the space in which it occurs. Th is paper presents the (un)sustainable rural tourism practice in Lika-Senj County in Croatia through a case study of the Linden Tree Retreat & Ranch and Plitvice Lakes. In order to understand the concepts of sustainable rural tourism, overtourism and undertourism, the case study begins with an analysis of statistical data, secondary literature and examples of overtourism in Lika (Plitvice Lakes Nati- onal Park). Qualitative insight (preliminary data) is used to refl ect on the Linden Tree Retreat & Ranch campaign called CIDER (Community, Integrity, Development, Evolution and Responsibility), which can be considered as the point of departure for the enhancement of undertourism development. Keywords: neo-endogenous development, overtourism, sustainable tourism, undertourism 1. INTRODUCTION1 Tourism is one of the most important social phenomena of the 20th and 21st centuries. Th is activity accounted for 10% of the global and 3.9% of the European Union’s GDP in 2018.2 According to available data, there were 1.3 billion tourist arrivals in the world in 20173 meaning that approximately one sixth of the (privileged!) world’s population travelled for leisure in 2017.