Survey Questions

1i F

U.S. Senate Questions#: 123456789 Judd Grqg-R' - Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (603) 626-1212 Johr. Rauh-0 NNN-NNNNN 16031 595-9353 Larry Brady-I YYYYYYYYY 16031 641-5900 US. House of Representatives Questions#: 123456789 mrie I Bill Zeliff-R Bob Preston-0 Key: Dirtriat 2 Y -. =Yes Dick Swett-D RI =No Bill Hatch-R - =NoResponse I

* Governor 3 Greas's-- actual survey response has sti 1 not ::-:been received by the Committee. However, these responses are :.+_...... t:.=:derived from the survey he is distributing to New Hampshire ."Right to Work Supporters and is claiming to have sent to us. Candidates for Governor on back Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "services" 6. Will you suppore amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidzs opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support rep4 of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called "anti-double breasting" legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees or construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act. which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or desrroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextonion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state. give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. 1 I 1. Will you support enactment of a state Right tn Work law by the New Hampshire Legislature? I i 2. Will you support the repeal of monopoly bargaining privileges union officials currently have ove:Fublic employees? 1 3. WiU you oppose so-called “agency shop” legislation h the public sector? I I

futrzP &!lPP ftl itz u Mwin Newton- R Y Y Y SteveMariU-R __- Calvin Warburton- L _-. 16 O~VCSaeer 50 phillippe cote st. P.O. Box 365 Mi&d 03055 Manchester 03101 Raymond 03077 Li& Fiteag- R -- Deborah Amesen- E) B B B MiriamLuce-L YYY P.&&ox 1233 RR 1. Box 42 I IO Landondeny Road Amherst03031 Orford 03117 Windham 03087 &d Dupont Jr.- R - Nonnan D’Amours- 0 _-_ 5 @&view Drive 135 Chase Way Rqchester.. 03867 Manchester 03104 Elikk~hHager- R - NedHelms-D NNN 5 *burn Street P.O. Box 1780 C*rd 03301 Manchester 03105 L._. .:

5 ,‘...... _.. . “ .s 0C.T-22-32 THU 7 5 DIRECT M-IL B. a1

Rt. 221 P.0. Box 143 Forest, VA 24551 Phone : COVER SHEET (804) 525-0155 I Fax: (804) 525.5450 Direot Xai mmunicatbons. Xner Forest Square, PoresC, VA 24551 1(804)535-0155 Pax 1<8041525-5450

Poataga Repuast Paam Proj plgs D.Aohilles I for PORN 3600/3602 (gc/n/rI Drop D% 10/23/92 VA Cnts 0 TO1 Client ,NRTW, DMC Job# 4116

RE: Postage request for JOB ,Suzvey Target speaials-

... . P3ease Suriiish Postage oheaE( in Aluount of 8Q6,797.a? ,,immediately. ::, as yex below listed PRESORT: (maKe aheck paysbla to DHC-PosCagp Aocntl .~...... ~:~~YX***X*mX~V*****m~~~*****~x~~~~~~~*~~xx~~*~~~x~m~~x~~~~~~*~~~*~~~~~~~~** .._.. ''360O-PC 1st CL Begulaz Postage - Live Stamp - Group NO. nH Piacas AraC a3t Stamp Diff Paid ~~~~.T#002855D-R Basic .29OX 029956- = Q8,G87.2(r 86,889-88 $1,797.36 ..-. !.: Sub 29956 = $8.687.24 $6,889.88 $31797.36 _. - Total .,.. '3600-PC 1st: CL Regulaz Postage - Live Stamp - ... AmC 239 Diff ;Group-. KO. CO Piaoes Stamp Paid 1 L:;TBOGI30 GD R Basio .290X 046513- = 913,498.77 i%Op6Q7.9Q $2.790,78 ! - 5. Sub - Total. 46513 = 8130433.79 $10,697.99 $2r790*78 , t;.: ~~i3600-p~.- 1st CL Ragular Postage - Live Stamp - Group No. UT Pieoes amt 239 S+amp Diff Paid Tt01808 5D-R Baeia .29OX 015947, = ti;4,624.63 $3s667.81 S%96,82 Sub - Total 15947 = SUt624.63 83,667.$1 $956. a2 3600-PC lat CL Regular PoStags - Liva Stamp - Gcoup No. SC Pieces Aint; 236 SCamp DPff Pald TB00500 5D-R Baeia .29OX 016666,- = $4.833.94 93,833.18 8999.96 Sub - Total 16666 = ~~~833.111$3.a33.18 8999.96

3600-PC 1st Cfi Regular Boetaga - EiVr Stamp - GEOU~no. HV Pisces Amk 239 Stainp Diff Paid TB01356 SD-R Basio ,290X 006670, = 81,930.30 $1,534.10 $400.aO Sub - 20bl 6870 = '$1.934.30 81,534.10 ~.4OOt2r! 3600-PC 1st CL Regular Postage - Live Stamp - Group KO. NC piieoas Amt 239 Stamp Diff Paid T106555 50-R Basio .29ox 031835, = $9,232.15 w.322.05 $1,910.10 Sub - Total 31835 = 89,232.15 $7,322.05 91,910.10

3600-PC 1st CL Regular Postage - Live Stamp - Group NO. TD Pieoes Ant 234 Staiop DijEf Paid T#06028 SD-R Basio .290X 013785, a cS3,997.65 83.170.55 $827.10 Sub - Total 13785 "83,997.65 %3,'170.55 6827. IO I IRTW ACC. Rep. 1 up 1/9/92 10113

~ I I-

! To: Reed Larson, President I National Right to Work Conunittee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite #SO0 , i;.. -I Springfield, VA 22160 , ..-.. :.i ’

, ..- Dear Reed:

I have: _. . ... Called the candidates.

Written a personal letter or otherwise contacted the candidates.

Enclosed a contribution of:

$25 $50 $100

$500 Other

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. 7hedRiphtto Work Committee's Washmeton DC. Hadauzrters IS Iccakd at our nahon's am- &bt fml BrJddock Road b!s 500 * SDn~.&!d-&V m% TeieDhQne (800) 32 5-7892. ka&&e JRshas mumized NRTWC as tax exempt under IRC Sec 501(c)(4). which ~ermitsunliiiled lobbvln& contributions are not tax dcduchble as chantablc conlnbuhons. To: Reed Larson, President National Right t.o XOKk Conanittee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite #508 Springfield, VA 22160

Dear Reed:

I have:

-.- Called the candidates.

-7-n-z,ren ' A. a pi.rsonal or otherwise -.- letter ccncac-ed the candicIat.es .

.?nclossb a cgccriSution of: --I

-. $530 -. Other

Please make checks pzl :ble and return to: NRTWC.

ACKGROUNDER The information below is helpful in explaining the questions on the reverse side of this form.

, ~~

1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to the administration of President John E Kennedy. i represene and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. Labor unions are the only private. organization in the U.S. 1 want its “services.” which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as Ireasuries. , “exclusive bargaining rights.” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (WCA) prohibits union officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a i to bargain for themselves. Union oflicials fought for this power and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” u) represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use ~ 1 Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political i fmancial support from so-called “free riders” for representation spending on goods and services to elect candidates for federal 1 they do not want. offices. These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition to union PAC me f~ngof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or contribudons; they are seldom - if ever - documented or s is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor reported to the Federal Election Commission. ations Act and thz National Railway Labor Act ,. . No official statistics for total union “in-kind“ expenditures t:...~. . Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that .employees shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Rieszl estimated that ’ ~..~: union activities “except to the extent that such right may be this so-called ”soft money” amounted to 10 times more than affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft nioney” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years, legislation has been inrroduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upon workers of existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest 3.1..: In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. -National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies .~.A;- - unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, the compulsory union

~ =; . .: conuact would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion ...... The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws, saying, ‘The

~ ’ .-right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election ccnducted by thc account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board u) determine worker suppcn. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legislation would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use reaffimed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractors at a job site. 1. Extortion. as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the strrte and local power over federal employees, which makes union officials the level. some criminal activities (including extorticn), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obsmct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so imporlant that they should be covered by federal statutes. As the federal law currently sunds. union officials have Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder, manslaughter, making. arson, aggravated property desmction, political agenda. explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by during a suike. bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who employees at various levels of government. choose noe to strike by giving preferential. post-strike hiring Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and privileges to strikers. municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will which shield public employees from union coercion. work during a violent strike under these conditions, employers Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal would be forced to cave in to every demand by union offiilds employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to dues be fired. HAVE ALL RECOMMENDED CHANGES BEEN MADE! 0 YES a NO

PROOFING:

1 ST REVISION NEEDED

2ND REVISION NEEDED

3RD sD/(/pb (6//4 REVISION NEEDED )vi3

4-m - REVISION NEEDED

5TH REVISION NEEDED 6TH dYE( ,,R:SION NEEDED FINAL COPY APPROVED! DATE: (o-r[J U.S. Senate Questions #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Questions#: 123456789 Dbt.zi.at 3 Dlatriat 6 Questions# 123456789 Hike Calihan-D ------Tom Kolbe-D N--N-NYN- Ben Campbell-D ------(3031 320-3918 (303) 850-3867 (3031 837-0565 Scott McInnis-R YYYYYYYNY Dan Schaefer-R I ------Terry Considine-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (303) 242-4623 (3031 989-2100 1303) 157-2567 DmL% 4 U.S. House ~f Representatives Tom Redder-D - I------(303) 224-9767 Questions#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wayne Allard-R YYYYYYYYY .;;jDistriat 1 (303) 226-2226 ...... ,‘.-‘Pat Schroeder-D ------i,:~(303) 866-1230 Dirtrfpt 5 :;.. ..:;.. Raymond Diaz Aragon-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Charles Ociez-D I------.. .. (303) 798-3236 ...1 1303) 320-6607 .: Joel Hefley-R YYYYYYYYY :‘D&trlat 2 (303) 933-0044 = NO .:. David Skaggs-D ------= NO Response ’... ’-. (303) 65C-7886 I i: Bryan Day-R YYYYYYYYY .1; f (303) 422-8692

...... ~.. ...-

::...... ~.~...... Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse IO accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative. which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members?

2. Nrill YOU support repea] of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you Oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as its primary goal. IO forcibly unionize employees of consauction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 3. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion starute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firinn of emolovees who choose to work during a strike. and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state. giveunion officials the power to shut dGwn Gsinesses thnt county and municipal employees? refuse to force their einployees to pay union dues?

~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endones no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. co

U.S. Senate aueslionsa: 123455789 Questions#: 123456789 I Dm-3 Diatxiat 6 Questions#: 123456789 Mike Calihan-D ------Tom Kalbe-D N--N-NYN- Ben Campbell-D ------1 (303) 320-3918 (3031 850-9867 l3C3) 837-0565 Scott McInnis-R YYYYYYYNY Dan Schaefee-R ------Terry Considine-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 13031 242-4623 (303) 989-2100 (303) 757-2567 Dirtriat I .bf.S. House of Representatives Tom Redder-D ------.. . (303) 224-9767 .. auestions t: i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wayne Allard-R YYYYYYYYY patrift 1 (303) 226-2226 Pdt Scnraeder-O ------(303) 866-1230 Dirtrkt 5 ------Raymond Diaz Araqon-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Charles Oriez-D Key: .(3031 320-6607 (3031 798-3236 Joel Hefley-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y =Yes p%-t=ict 2 1303) 933-0044 N =No Dpvid Skaqgs-D ------=NQkSpQnSt! (303) 650-7886 BPyan Day-R YYYYYYYYY .+3031 422-8692 .. .~..

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe: m employee who does not want the “services” Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative. which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 140) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a smke. and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay uiiion dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we belitevethat you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will suppon the righi of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. BACKGWOrnEW The information below is helpful in explaining the questions on the reverse side of thffi form.

1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to the administration of President John F. Kennedy. represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. Labor unions are the only private. organization in the US. want its “services.” which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as treasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights.” deprives employees of their right The Feded Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” IO represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use ... : Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political i:. financial support from so-called “free riders” for representation spending on goods and services 10 elect candidares for federal i- they do not want. offices. These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition lo union PAC 2.:-. The firing of workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or coniiibutions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or : fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor reponed to the Federal Election Commission. :-~.Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act NO official statistics for total union “in-kind” expenditures ..::.. Section 7 of the MLRA. for example, stipulates that employees shall have “the right to refrain” fmm participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated that 7. this so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more than i-’: union activities “except to the extent that such right may be ’ affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on thai ~~ ~ yardstick, union “soft money’’ in 1990 exceeded $350 million. .-.?.. organization as a condition of employment.” .. . ::...... ~~ The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years, legislation has been introduced in Congress : Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upon workers of .- existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. ..-. - nonunionized companies which have even (he slightest economic links to unionized companies. 3;-..:_ ... : In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct WOik. he compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of Lhm laws, saying, ‘The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board to determine worker support. labor organization.” The “anti-double brasting” legislation would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizes to use rcaffiied by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket arid the National Lzbor Relations Act. shut down all the other sukonuactors at a job site. 4. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency” shops, compulsoiy hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees. which makes union officials ihe level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, officials have union prohibitions against the of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to use commit or committing felonies - such as murder, coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ manslaughter. maiming, arson, aggravated property destruction, political agenda. explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargajning demands. prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by during a strike. bills designed lo authorize the forced unionization of public The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who employees at various levels of government. choose not to strike by giving preferential, post-strike hiring Several of these proposals are aimed at state. county and privileges 10 strikers. municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will which shield public employees from union cwrcion. work during a violent strike under these conditions. employers Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to dues be fired. HAVE ALL RECOMMENDED CHANGES BEEN MADE? $/YES NO

PROOFING:

1ST REVISION NEEDED

2ND REVISION NEEDED

3RD 5pK/PB REVISION NEEDED Na

4TH REVISION NEEDED

5TH REVISION NEEDED

FINAL COPY APPROVED? DATE: 6

U.S. Senate Questions#: 123456789 Richard Stallings-D ------(208) 336-1992 Dirk Kempthorne-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (208) 336-0092

U.S. House of Representatiwes Questions#: 123456789 OiaersOt 1 Larry LaRocco-D ------Rachel Gilbert-R YYYYYYYYY

DLtrM 2 J.D. Williams-D ------Michael Crapo-R YYYYYYYYY

I 1 Key: Y =Yes w =No - =NoRsponse

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election ’ of a labor union should have the right to refuse UJaccept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-HartIcy Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federz! employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal anti-extortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employpcxs who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues? I Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpanisan organization. But we believe that you z a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. L L ID

U .S. Senate Outistion,#: 123456789 Richard StallIngs-D ------Dirk Kernpthor le-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y US. House of Representatives ~usstions~:1234567e9 oiat+lat 1 Larry LaRocco-D ------Rachel Gilbert-R YYYYYYYYY

OIEtrM 2 J.D. Williams-D ------Michael Crapo-R YYYYYYYYY

I Key: ...~:--.._ =Yes -. Y ..._.. . .- N =No - =NoResponse

I. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "services" 6. Wiii you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 1. Will you support repeal of thc provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called "anti-double breasting" legislation authorize compulsory unionism? hat has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? I. Do you favor preservation of Section 14&) of the Taft-Hartley Act. which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 1. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would pnnish or require the Bring of employees who choose to work during a strike, and ). Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

~~~~~~ ~~~ Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to eam a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. BACKGROUNDER The information below is helpful in explaining the questiors on the reverse side of thii form. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to the administration of President John E Kennedy. represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining unions are the only private organization in the U.S. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. Labor want its “services.” which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as treasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits iinion officials to use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political fmancial support from so-called “free riders” for representation spending on goods and services tc e!%t candidates for federal they do not want. offices. These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition to union PAC The firing of workers who refuse to pay union dues andfor contributions; they are seldom - if ever - documen:& or fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor reported to the Federal Election Commission. Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act. No official statistics for total union “in-kind” expenditures Section the NLRA, for example, stipulates that 7 of are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel eslimated that employees shall have “the right to relnin” from paiicipating in union activities “‘except io the extent that such right may be this so-called “soft money” amounted tQ 10 times more than affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that organization a a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years, legislation has been introduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upon workers of existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws, saying, ‘The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work sh:ill not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relaticns Board to determine worker support. labor organization.“ The “anti-double breasting” legislation would &o encourage The autliority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use reaffmed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subconrractors at a job site. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful io union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops. loosen the SO-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union officials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important hat they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hanch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for heatesing to commit or committing felonies - such as murder, coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ manslaughter, maiming, arson, aggravated propeny destruction, political agenda. explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by during a saike. bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who employees at various levels of government. choose not to strike by giving preferential, post-strike hiring Several of these propsals are aimed at state, county and privileges to strikers. municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will which shield public employees from union coercion. work during a violent strike under these conditions. employers Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal would be forced to cave in IO every demand by union officials employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal - including the demand that workers who refuse IO pay union Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to dues be fired. -

.. i-7 FROM: ...,... ~.. ... ii....- .. ...~ .. . HAVE ALL RECOMMENDED CHANGES BEEN MADE? YES [7 NO i-i rP. -...... PROOFING: ...... -_...~ . .~...... 1ST REVISION NEEDED XQ _...... ::I?..~~~.. 2ND REVISION NEEDED m

‘’3//4 REVISION NEEDED Na

4TH REVISION NEEDED

5TH REVISION NEEDED

6TH REVISION NEEDED

FINAL COPY APPROVED? @?ES 0 NO DATE: dL%hz NC c A

I U.S. Senate Questionst: 123456789 Questions #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dir+rM 4 Dktriat 10 1 David Price-D ------Ben Neill-D ------I Question$#: 123456789 YYYY Y YYY Y ~ Terry Sanford-D ------Vicky Goudie-R YYYYYYYYY T. Cass Ballenger-R 1 (800) 722-1992 Faircloth-R YYYYYYVYY Dbt.l3ot 5 District 11 --y (919) 790-1111 Stephen Neal-D YYYYYYYNY John Stevens-D ----_- Richard Burr-R YYYYYYYYY Charles Taylor-R YYYYYYYYY i U.S. House of Representatives DihrM 6 Distriat 12 Robin Hood-D ------Melvin Watt-D ------1 ..:; Questions#: 123456789 J. Howard Coble-R YYYYYYYYY Barbara Gore Washington-R ------~ .&strid 1 :ma Clayton-D ------Dist;rM I .?Fed Tyler-R YYYYYYYYY Charlie Rose-D ------...... Robert Anderson-R YYYYYYYYY '@Striat 2 Tim Valentine, Jr.-D ------D-M 8 iQpn Davis-R YYYYYYYYY W. G. Hefner-D YYYYYYY-Y .. Coy Privette-R YYYYYYYYY ~tibtriat.~ 3 ::% Martin tancascer-D Y Y Y Y Y - Y N Y DihrM 9 T.nmqy Pollard-R YYYYYYYNY Rory Blake4 ------Key: J. Alex McMillan-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y =Yes N =No - =NoRespcnse

...... ~......

.. ~ ......

Survey Questions

I. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "services" 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory unior! dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members?

2. Will you support of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will YOU Oppose so-called "anti-double breasting" legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as its primary goal, to fcrcibly unionize employees of consmction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Haich Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legisiation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpanisan organization. BUI we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to howwhich candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. I 1 NC

I 1 US. Senate Questions#: 123456789 Questions 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I DMriOt 5 Dbtriut 11 Questions#: 123456789 Stephen Neal-D YYYYYYYNY John Stevens-D --y ------Terry Sanford+ ------Richard Eurr-R YYYYYYYYY Charles Taylor-R YYYYYYYYY Lauch Faircloth-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Di&?3.uk 6 Dhtrid 12 I .:..U.S. f-iouse of Representatives Robin Hood-D ------Melvin Watt-0 ------.~ ..,. J. Howard Coble-R ‘i Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Barbara Gore - - - ’ j, -, Questions# 123456789 Washington-R ------DMrict 1 DMriat I :Eva Clayton-D ------Charlie Rose-D ------rpd..: Tyler-R YYYYYYYYY Robert Anderson-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y DI.triat 2 Dl~trlat8 i2im Valentine, Jr.-D ------W. G. Hefner-D Y YYYYYY -Y $4. Davis-R YYYYYYYYY Coy Privette-R YYYYYYYYY

;-rich 3 Diutrlat 9 H.. Martin Lancaster-D Y Y Y Y Y - Y N Y Rory Blake-D ------.~~...~Tom~y Pollard-R YYYYYYYNY J. Alex Motillan-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y .- i’Wrtdae 4 District 10 I I ..David Price-D ------Ben Heill-D ------Key: Vicky Goudie-R YYYYYYYYY Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y .. . T. Cass Ballenger-R Y =Yes I N =No 1 - =NoResponse

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees 01 construction companies’? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextonion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a suike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter m.entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living -without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. BACKGROWER The information below is helpful in explaining the - questions on the reverse side of thii form. 1. A union. under oresent federal laws. is emDowered to the administration of President John F. Kennedy. represent and bind $1 employees in a company’s’ bargaining unit including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. Labor unions are the only private organization in the U.S. - which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their want its “services.” This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as treasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election CampJgn Act (FECA) prohibits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are ”unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political fmancial SUDLKI~ from so-called “free riders” for reoresentation spending on goods and sewices to elect candi&t.r for federal thev-, do not ;ant offices. These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition to union PAC The f~ngof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or contributions: they are seldom - if ever - documented or fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor the Federal Election Commission. Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act reported to No official statistics for total union “in-kind” expenditures Section 7 of the NLRA, for example, stipulates that are available. But Labor columnist Victor Kiesel estimated that employees shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in to 10 union activities “except to the extent that such right may be this so-called “soft money” amounted times more than affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that ...... _ organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. ..~-.. .. .~.. . The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years, legislation has been introduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upon workers of existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws. saying, ‘The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmemhership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board to determine worker support. labor organization.“ The “anti-double braling” legislation would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers Lo use reaffmed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all Lhe other subcontractors at a job site. 4. Extortion. as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demands a$ compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency“ shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union officials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so imponant that hey should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack expiici6 the federal Iaw currently stands. union officials have As prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power LO unique special immunities from picmxution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter, maiming, arson, aggravated property destruction, explosives or firearms offenses, et. - to obtain collective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by during a strike. bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who employees at various levels of government. choose not to strike by giving preferential. post-strike hiring Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and privileges to strikers. municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will which shield public employees from union coercion. work during a violent shike under these conditions, employers Oher bills would slrip postal workers and other federal would be forced u) cave in to every demand by union officials employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to dues be fired. 1 .I3 -. i , .. / " ~ ' i DATE: I ..

. .~ ...- .. PROOFING: j ..: ..- .i. c-: 1 EVISlON NEEDED a ._...~... ST -..-

.. .. .~ ..~.:/... 2ND REVISION NEEDED -.

REVISION NEEDED Ma

4% REVISION NEEDED

5TH REVISION NEEDED

6TH REVISION NEEDED

FINAL COPY APPROVED? dES ON0 DATE: 10-/-3-c72 U.S. Senate QuestionsIf: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Judd Grwa-R* -YYYYYYYY (603) 62;-1212 John Rauh-D NNN-NNNNN (603) 595-9353 Larry Brady-I YYYYYYYYY (6031 641-5900 U.S. House of Representatives Questions I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dbtdat 1 Bill Zeliff-R YYYYYYYYY Bob Preston-D ------Key: DLtriCrt 2 Y =Yes Dick Swett-D ------Bill Hatch-R YYYYYYYYY N =NO - =NoResponse

-...... Governor Judd Gregg’s actual survey response has still not

,~i been received by the Conunittee. However, these responses are I~ . derived from the survey he is distributing to New Hampshire ...;I;.. . .. Right to Work Supporters and is claiming to have sent to us. Candidates for Governor on back Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of consauction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require thc firing of employees who choose to work during a saike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union ofticiafs the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a noripanisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. 1. Will you support enactment of a stnte Right to Work law by the New Hampshire Legislacure?

2. Will you support the repeal of monopoly bargaining privileges mion officials currently have over public employees?

3. Will you oppose socnlled "agency shop" legislation in the public sector?

Candidates for Governor

ttlabll #.la@ uta14 Mervin Newton- R Y Y Y SteveMariU-R -__Calvin Warbunon- L _-- L6Giove Sneer 50 Phillippe Cote St. P.O. Box 365 Uiqrd 03055 Manchester 03101 Raymond 030'17 -i&s Fsreag- R _-.Deborah Amesen- D BBB Miriam Luce- L YYY ?.@.'Box 1233 RR I. Box 42 110 Londonderry Road hhxst03031 Word 03777 Windham 03087 35ard Dupont, Jr.- R .-_Norman D'Amours- D ___ iwptview Drive 135 Chase Way <*hester 03867 Mnnchrster 03104 Key: N NegstiveResponse :>.. Y Positive Response B BlankResponse 3lizabelh Hager- R - ~ - NtdHelms-D NNN 5 Auburn Sneer P.O. Box 1780 ~ Refused to Respond -@cord.. - 03301 Manchester 03105 ..1-.

..~. .. . :; : .... .~. U.S. Senate Questions#: 123456709 Add Greqg-R* -YYYYYYYY John Rauh-D NNN-NNNNN Larry Brady-I YYYYYYYYY US. House of Representatives f2uestionsI: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 9 miat 1 Bill Zeliff-R YYYYYYYYY Bob Preston-D ------

Key: Y =Yes N =No - =P(oResponse

_.~~ ...~.~ ...~.- ..~...~..

.~...... :..j: : -~*Governor Judd Gregg’s actual survey response has still not been received by the Committee. However, these responses are derived from the survey he is distributing to New Hampshire Right to Work Supporters and is claiming to have sent to us. Candidates for Governor on back

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the eight to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the ixe of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation aurhonze compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of consauction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Mey Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under {he federal and-extortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation hat would punish or require the fuing of employees who choose to work during a snike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: Tie National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entided to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses For the privilege. I. WiU you support enactment of a state Right to Work law by the New Hampshire Legislature?

2. WiU you support the repeal of monopoly bargaining privileges union officials currently have over public employees? 3. Will you oppse so-cdled “agency shop” legislation in the public rector?

Candidates for Governor

......

1e 1 uftilill ftlBfLl #la& @enin Newton- R Y Y Y SteveMhll-R - - - CalvinWarbunm-L ___ I$Gmve Street 50 Phillippe Cote St. P.O. Box 365 Milford 03055 Manchester 03101 Raymond 03077 hius Fiiteng- R ___ Deborah Arnesen- D B B B MiriamLuce-L YYY EO.Box 1233 RR 1. Box 42 110 Londondeny Road wmt03031 Orford 03777 Windham 03087 Edward Duponr 11.- R _-_Nman D’Amours- D __- S..WestviowDrive 135 Chase Way &Chester.~ 03867 Manchester 03 104 .. . !&abeth Hager- R ___ Ned Helms- D NNN 5 Auburn Street P.O.Box 1780 @ncord 0.3301 Manchesrer 03105 =-...... ~. U.S. Senate Questions#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 udd Gregg-R .-&--37- - f 9John Rauh-D Larry Brady-I YYYYYYYYY U.S. House of Representatiwes Questions#: 123496789 Dhtriat 1 Bill Zeliff-R YYYYYYYYY Bob Preston-D ------

DiEtriat 2 1...... -- ---_--- it... Dick Swett-D Bill Hatch-R YYYYYYYYY

...... i.- . Key: ...... Y =Yes ...... i N =No - =NoResponse

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept hi Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you sqpofi repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you Oppose so-called ‘:anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? tha? has, as i$ primaey goal, to forcibly unionize employee.. of construction companies? 3. Do you favor pem-vation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right IO Work laws? 8. Will you oppose. legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union polilical 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal anti-extortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firina of emDlovees who choose to work during a strike. and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal. state, giveunion &&ials the power to shut down Lkinesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We arr a nonpanisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter ate entitled w know which cadidam will sumthe righi of every American to earn a living -without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. !-

OFF (Attach to FINAL copy)

HAVE ALL RECOMMENDED CHANGES BEEN MADE? YES NO

PROOFING:

1ST paISM& REVISION NEEDED XS I

2ND REVISION NEEDED

3RD 'y/4 REVISION NEEDED Afd

4m REVISION NEEDED

5m REVISION NEEDED

6rn REVISION NEEDED

FINAL COPY APPROVED? dS UNO DATE: "4/1? US. Senate Questions# 123456789 Harry Reid-D ___-__--- (702) 598-1992 Demar Dahl-R YYYYYYYYY (7021 737-8800 US. House of Representatives auestionsrll: 723456789 ...... - .. nmiat 1 J. Coy YYYYYYYYY ..-.. Pettyjohn-R (702) 259-a683 ,>~ :. James Bilbray-D ------.. ... (702) 369-8155 ;z f nktriat 2 Pete Sferrazza-D -_---_--- ! ...... (702) 324-7383 _.- Barbara Vucanovich-R YYYYYYYYY

Key: Y =Yes N =No - =NoResponse

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who dms not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to theI Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union €oms him to xcept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breashg” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. a5 its primary goal. to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. a0 you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right 10 Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal emp1oyeP-s from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislntim that would punish or require &e firng of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse u) force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right 10 Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Rjgh110 Work supporter are entitled t(p know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. US. Senate Questionno#: 123456789 Harrv Reid4 ____---_- Der& Uahl-R YYYYYYYYY (702) 752-3806 U.S. House of Representatives r. 1 .. . i ii QursUunsII: 123456780 +. 1 i ~. nLtriat J. Coy Pettyjohn-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y .....i.i . i: (702) 259-8683 James Bilbray-D -_-_---_- (702) 369-8155 ; ... .-. .. niotriut 2 ... --__---- ...,... . Pete Sferrazza-D - (702) 324-7383 Barbara Vucanovich-R YYYYYYYYY

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive represenrauve, which federal law now and fees for political ca.uses and candidates opposed by union forces him to 8CCept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal. to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. YX, you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Acs which authorizes 5mte Right to Wark laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Wii; you oppose legislation that would punish or require the fung of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, slate, give union officials the power 10 shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees 10 pay union dues?

1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to the administration of President John F. Kennedy. represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. Labor unions are the only private organization in the U.S. want its “services.“ which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopdy bargaining power, generally described as treasuries. ’ “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibirs union 10 bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a 1 and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use ~. . burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. I Such complaints m intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political financial support from so-called “free riders” for representation pending on goods and services to elect candidates for federal offices. These “in-kind” expenditures m in addition 10 union PAC The firing of workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or contributions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor reported to the Federal Election Commission. ’ r-. Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act No official statistics for total union “in-kind“ expenditures ’, ... : Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that employees shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in are available. But Labor columilist Victor Riesel estimated that if. this so-called “soft money” amolinted to 10 times more than : j union activities “except to the extent that such right may be affecfed by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that .i- organization as a condition of employment.” yardsuck, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. -. ~. : The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. J,, recent years, legislation has been inuducd in congress -z Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upon workers of existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from comuulsorv Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perfom ~separace.and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of lhese laws, saying, “The confxact would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by thc account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board to determine worker support. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legislation would also encouragc The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organL.-=IS to use reaffmed by Section 140) of the Taft-Hartley amendments u) a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractors at a job site. Extortion. as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the SO-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most crimind law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union officials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion). which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievacce situations. be so imponant that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Watch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands. union officials have prohibitions against the of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to use commit or committing felonies - such as murder, coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ manslaughter. maiming, arson, agpvated property destruction, political agenda. explosives or firms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by during a strike. bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who employees at various levels of government. choose not to strike by giving preferential, post-strike hiring Several of these. proposals are aimed at state, county and privileges to saikers. municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will which shield public employees from union coercion. work during a violent shike under these conditions, employers Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials employees of the freedom of choice guaranreed by the Postal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to dues be fired. NV .ATES OF

_- , -/

/‘

U.S. Senate

J. Coy Pectyjohn-R (7029 259-8683 James Bilbray-D (7021 369-8155 District 2 Pete Sfeerazza-0 (7021 324-7383 Barbara Vucanovich-R

Key: Y =Yes N =No - =NoResponsc

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right IO refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes ,and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Ac&which authorizes state Right D Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act. which protects federal employees from union political 4. Wouid you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextonion sutus? 9. Will you oppose legislation hat would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state. give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

~~ ~-~ ~ ~~______Note: The National Right D Work Committee, of course. endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supponer are. entilled U) know which candidates wili support the right of every American LO earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. ..~ . ..!\! ...5' 8 I L?

L..~ i... ._... . ?.>

...?. .~ f-. 'i-. BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ...- cj:. !.j

._.. .. In the Matter of )

f--.i Witness Subpoena to ) MUR 3774 ..~.~~ The National Right to) +=.:ri Work Committee ) ;,:-~......

DOCUMENTS FROM NRTWC

Supplemental Submission in Response to Letter from FEC dated 9/4/97

Item 1.b. ST ANALYSIS SHEET -wz-

PACKAGE :

e~+#Cost Per

. .. 11-

SUB TOTAL COST PER PKG. PLUS OVERaGE TOTAL COST ' . . '.P.O. plo.;c,',~. MATlONAt R 'TO WORK CQMMlTfEE ...... -. 80 ADDOCK ROAD THIS ORDER NO. 'MUST ...... SPRINGFIELD,.~VIRGlNIA 22160 _'-'I.,...... ' APPEAR' ON 'ALL INVOICES .*~ ......

.. i ~ .. . L. ., . LETTERCOPI SIbX. I I NG -. 'SEkW i@S. i ...... MA L .~ . .- .. ..

I 3'; -..:< ...... aQ.z ....,_ 1 .. ... - ... I. f.: 6-L.Z...... ~. ..

t4m

...... - ...... - ..

: . .. _.-.

.I ...

I .,

.,. ...

!--- ...... - .... 1. .:...... , ...... PLEASE INVOICEIN DUPLICATE '1 :?...... i ...... I .. PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND .ONE ,SAMPLE ;. :. - ,I. ....I...... ,: . WITH EACH INVOICE...... ~ .. , ...... I .~ ...... :,...... ,,* DESK ... ,.. - I., j. '. 310Swann Avenue Alexandria, VA 22301 (7031 683-3105

I National Right to Work SOLD TO: 8001 Braddock Road

Springfield, VA 22160

.. . .. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ...... - .. FEDERRL SURVEY HOUSE TARGET SPECIAL - ROSTER ..*!.! :: 44,000 Copies, print 2 pages on Ivory paper and 1584.00 jii fold .~...... ~...... Fas Fax to Sisk 109.25 ...... - .....Ij.. . : ji:

SUBTOTAL

for your order. We have given it our very Careful attention. We appreciate your confidence in us. 1693.25 and look forward to serving you again soon. TO 'WORK COMMITTEE P.0. No. c 42332 THIS ORDER NO. MUST APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES .-

' STATE.ACTIVITIES' PUBLIE RELATIONS . 0MEMBERSHIP. :' GENERAL PROGRAMS ' , . . '. SPECIAL PROJECTS. : .a ... -. __( ... ) ...

1: 1...... i..~ . ..-

... .~ -_...... i .I ...... -. si>I: Hike,' please print the following: ...... i; ...._. \Lf". i~i.... b5m W1 LETPER -. 8.1/2' x p4 on 60# White offset. Prints 1/1 Black. Letterfold beadout with ~..>. .. ..-. COIBIOQ edge to a #IO...... : -. caI.1 OF lprobl'enrs:' PIeasc with 'any questions...... Thank you...... I.. .- . ... .' . Cost:"yriiiting and Shipping-, ...... : ...... :; ......

~etu~~ artriork . asid' 5 simsles'to' NRW at en:. Amos Lock. - ; ' ...... '700.cD I ...

PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE

PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE . . WITH EACH INVOICE. ,

DESK 310 Swann Avenue * Alexandria. VA 22301 (703) 6833105

National Right to Work SOLD TO: 8001 Braddock Road

li..i._,.. . INVOICE DATE INVOICE NO. 2: ...... 10/23/92 0348.55

DESCRIPTION I AMOUNT

I ~~ WISCONSIN LETTER

45,000 Copies, print 2 pages on White paper, fold 1938.00 and deliver

... Fas Fax to sisk 109.25 i?-...... ,.- :.:

MPTI

YO I TAX I for your order. We have given it our very careful attention. We appreciate your confidance in us, and look forward to sewing you again soon...... '. SHlP TO .. TO , e e . LrnERCOP1 SPLIT DELPVERY ...... AI"BW: MIKE ROCERA l..ii

;1 I z i_ .. & i

F3; =- I.. E?-...... -. .. .. 5:...... - ...... -

-...... -... REPLY - 8 .P/2.x 5 1;/2 -00 :50# Grebir 'ofEss@t. .. Prints 1/1 Black.. ' Tsi-fold in thirds headout. ... coimo& .. :.i with edge...... J' J' j ...... : >~, ... , .* SPLIT DBLIYEBY: DELIVER 31H TO: ...... HARRIS SERVICE$. . ; .- ,. .. -. .DAVE I1ARRIS ;...... ATPM: ...... ,...... ~. .. 5~LlmB-'thn .TO:- .... -.;.;:::I:, .:.;"...... I ...... :. s,Is~'~~f~i~G,SERV[CE:*:, ~.. :':, ......

7 :CLIESAPEIPIIE BAY BUSINESS.BARK'. ... -. STEVENSYILLE, ?ID-21666 ATTN: .CLYDE SISK ...... , . ,. - . ::. _. ... Please caBl..'withany..qluestions. oP. problems; ,

naak. YOU. .. 1...... , ...... , ... .. ,. . . :...... L cost:;Psiiting.... and hipp ping:'. , :,,,'. . : . > oc ...... , I, 5 Return .artwork'and% saiples eo M&tm'atti: Horgan ...... Birge. , ...... - . .I i.

......

, ' ,. .' PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE . .p. .(,..4 I PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE - WITH EACH INVOICE. . ce-d /

310 Swam Avenue Alexandria. VA 22301 (7031683.3105

National Right to Mark SOLD TO: 8001 Braddock Road

Springfield, VA 22160 !:.. .

- - DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ." ...~~...~~. FEDERAL SURVEY REPLYS i ...... 75,000 Copies, print 2 pages on Green papstr, cut ... 1335.00 .. and fold ..-. . Fan Fax to Sisk 4b,O00 __~~ 109.25 ..-~ ..-...... ~.

ROUTE TO: APPROVED:33Zf??z DEPTX 17 ACCT# 7aQ

1444 s 25 I NATIONAL TO WORK COM P.Q. No. C 22740. ' :-..- . R '.80 ADDOCK ROAD . THiS. ORDEA NO. MUST , . . , SPRINGFIELD.~VlRGlNlA~22160''.a. .' . . . . ,. , .' APPEAR :ON ALL INVOICES ' .. I I PURGEiflGE @)W@Ern

( 0 STATE ACTIVITIES PUGLIC RELATIDNS MEMBERSHIP GENERAL PROGRAMS SPECIAL PROJECTS

03,674

...... :...... I ., _. ; ...... , I... 'I . .I , Pieask'ov&r ins.ert. l53: sdihpIeS :of .the...,-. .. pacis,ga.and :.@end~ to;t~R.. tn':''. Ami&; Leek. .. . .? 1_...... , ...... ,.. ,: .. .>

.. -

PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE". . .. PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND .ONE SAMPLE : .~ . WITH EACH 'INVOICE. ..

DESK

~ ---..---

ESAPEAKE BAY BUSINESS PA NSVILLE, MARYLAND 21666- PAGE 1 DC 459-SISK - MQ (301) 6434iSK FAX DC-459-0943 YS NET. A SERVICE CHARGE OF 1.5% ER MONTH (ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE iaK) WILL~EADDEDTOPAST DUE ITEMS.

.I(-....----- SPECIAL INSTRUCTIDMS ------* SOLD TO:

Ns [(en i 5ie Kaff National Riqht TO Work Camm i t tee L.j! L.j! 8001. Braddock Road ...... ii.,i : Spi-ingf ieldr VA .~ 22151-2110 vi >~.

:!- 11-21-92 I3&87-00l 4510497 I WISC. wmm I DESCRIPTtON -E PER UW?

35.00 ! 1000 I ,520*59 --. _--. INSERT 4, SEAL, TRAY d, i_:i: ..-. ~ MAIL- FIRST CLASS

;= 'i :_._..:

SERVICE PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT 51 + 528.59

PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE

PRlNT&RS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE WITH EACH INVOICE.

BOOKKEEPING I ..i;;

.. .. .

...... ~~.

, ...... ii ~- :

P r-l

0 m e

I f t- r f f r --< I"I1D I. TU, ,,LUI.II) IICIIIln 'a*.*", "I. UPU1 m - NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE P.O. NO. c 12217 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD THIS ORDER NO. MUST SPRINGFIELD. VIRGINIA 22760 APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES

PuRGmaGE aRDEm [0 STATE ACTIVITIES PUBLIC RELATIONS a MEMBERSHIP 0GENERAL PROGRAMS SPECIAL PROJECTS

TO Neodata SHIP TO 0 Attn: May Haddad Sisk e i.-...... 0 ..- ;:I e i=; 0 i. i ..I' { Q20898 K20838 :DATE DATE REQUIRED RE: U20528 ~.. zf10/20/92 10/22/92 Wisconsin Fed. Surv. Special ...... , .I , -. . , .-: ' DESCRIPTION : ...... :.-..:PRICE..- Say, using the WI Active, Inactive & Supporter files that you pulled off previously (W.O. 1436 and (W.O. 73639)please provide a set of 4-up zheshire labels for each mail key. Include name and address, mail key and keyline. Ceep each mail key separate.

rlail ~eySelect 220893 Active WI D/A. Omit flags A,M,N,O,J, C20838 Inactive D/A. Omit flaus A.M.N.O. WI a ..., J20528 WI Supporters.

Chese labels must be at Sisk by Thurs. 10/22/92

PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE ,

ZRIMTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE / AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE WITH EACH INVOICE. INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY T CHECKS TO: ERKKSBURG, VIRGINIA 22403-5445 TA DATABASE MARKETiNG SERVICES, INi p,o, BOX 25504 752-2541 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23260-5504

i FEIN.54.0~~8925 INVOICE NO. , WORK ORDER NUMBER ) ACCOUNTNO. ) CUSTOMER P.O. 1 DATE I 74765E lao1o1 112-217 1 OCTOBER 319 1992 111651 c I I I 1 sou)TO: -, (- SdIPPEbTO ' NRTWC 7v2.5- # vg.a/ I8QO1 BRADDOCK ROAD 734"' d$Y.7f @RINGFIELD VA 22160 i&T'TN:.. GINA GUMN - .... . ii

.. I I L FUNCTION PERFORMED - DESCRIPTION -'slot

lti FEDERAL SURVEY SPECIAL ._.. 64INT 4-UP CHESHIRE LAaELS .:ACTIVES HI 21 ';.*INACTIVES~. WI 21 -i-2SUPPORTERS WI 41 SHIPPING ANC HANDLING CHARGES FED EX WAYBILL IwS DATE zzai9a1441 10-22 48

1 PAGE 0F 1 TERMS NET 30 October 26, 1992 Dear Wisconsin Member: I'm writing you today because I'm very concerned about how State Senator Russell Feingold will vote on compulsory-unionism legislation if he becomes Wisconsin's next U.S. Senator.

a U-S, senxor. RUSSE11 FP insold c&ues to ha nQ flly-?-un oni 'L wo ' wi SUffa. And so will the entire nation. As a Wisconsin State Senator for 10 years, Mr. Feingold has voted with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses every time. One of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers, Mr. Feingold sponsored and rammed through the Wisconsin Senate a Pushbutton Strike bill "clone" (S.B. 70) which, like U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy's federal bill, would force employers to punish or even fire workers who resist union-boss strike orders. If Governor Tonmty Thompson had not heeded Right to Wozk advocates' pleas to veto this bill, it would have incited violent strikes, increased Big Labor's power to force workers to pay union dues, and driven more businesses and good jobs out of the Badger State. State Senator Feingold has also actively pushed for a bill (S.B. 262) to strip University of Wisconsin employees of the right to bargain €or themselves over their wages and benefits by forcing them to accept union "representation." Handing faculty union czars this monopoly bargaining privilege would bring the inflated costs, declining quality and bloated bureaucracy -- common in Wisconsin's union-boss ruled primary and secondary schools -- to higher education. Nr. F-insold's recprd clearlv indicates that he could $e .wunted on to&& his pals in Biq Labor. Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal government. If the union political machine sweeps Wisconsin and just two other U.S. Senate seats into Big Labor's camp (and possibly the White House as well), Mr. Feingold could cast the key vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law. He could vote to destroy all Right to Work laws by abolishing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, and force all government e-loyees to pay union kes to swell Big mor's political and organizing coffers. That's why I've already asked you to inundate Mr. Feingold with phone calls, letters and postcards. Thousands of angry Wisconsin citizens are now urging him to support Right to Work. But State Senator Feingold continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Russell Peingold ignoring you and the rest of the huge majority of Wisconsin citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? Maybe it's because Russell Fefngold is up to his ears in union forced-dues "in-kind. campaign favors. Paul Gigot of the respected Wa-eet Tournak points out that Mr. Feingold is strongly backed by the big-time, big-money Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC) teacher union. WEAC, a subsidiary of the National Education Association (NEA) union, has dumped hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of hidden "soft" money into Mr. Feingold's campaign in the form of partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time, paid "volunteers.'I WAC has even lent one of its former officers, Morris Andrews, to Mr. Feingold as his campaign chairman. Until recently, Andrews was the top boss of WEAC and is considered the heaviest of the heavyweight special interest lobbyists in Madison. Now he's there making certain Big Labor gains control of another Senator. So while Mr. Feingold is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. .. It's a simple (if sleazy) arrangement. . .. .,: .. He votes their wayd-;hey bankroll his State Legislative and U.S. Senate campaigns with forced-uniondues stolen from American workers. P11 all State Sen IFin dnw 08 2 1- 7800 aM urcre him to r wdiate his SUQDQ_1- r for forced un ionisrr\ . Only yg!x procests can make >E.Feingold renounce his cozy :.._: .. relationship with Big Labor. ..;; .~ ...... ~. Tell State Senator Feingold you won't stand for his political dirty pool of taking Rig Labor hackroom payoffs -- ..f"..- while he stonewalls Wisconsin citizens. Tell him he's not si ! fooling pnvbody, and urge him to stop voting to force workers ...... to pay union dues. 0-a 0-a 3e n gid resucnd to his survey crener allv in favor of Risht to Work. and abost a lwavs votme. iah S Mr. Xasten has voted to Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fought for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, opposed efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and supported a crackdown on strike violence. Unfortunately, Senator Kasten did vote to gut the Hatch Act. This bill would have allowed union officials to browbeat the 2.9 million federal emplcyees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers into supporting the union political mchine. In 1991, Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-old law. NOW union czars are pressuring Mr. Xasten intensely to renounce all support for the Right to Work. It's vital that you urge Mr. Kasren to reconsider his support for Hatch Act repeal. Please call him at I 414) 354-10U 3- 3- le of Wisconsin surmort his Dledcre on aX me8 R&ht to Work w. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. State Senator Russell Feingold must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now is the time, in the face of a tough U.S. Senate battle, when he is most likely to mend his ways. meca11 him today. COPY APPROVALLPROOFXNG CHECK-OFF

(ATTACH TO FINAL DRAn: COPY WITH DI SK 1

CKECK OFF IF . . . ROUTED TO: APPROVED BY:

HEF -d -J SG - - HApi - KG J L RL __I - RJC - - KLW -

.. ALL RECOMMENDED CHANGES WADE: @ NO ..::.. ._...... FACT CIIECK CONPLETEO: 1 +/7L APPROVED: 19 ;9* (DATE) ( SIGNATOKE)

TO PROOFING: CHANGES NEEDED:, CHANGES MADE:

THIS FORM I WITH cOPY A-1 TO ORI-. Octoberm 1992 W Dear Wisconsin Member: r'm writing you today because I'm very concerned about how State Senator Russell Feingold will vote on compulsory-unionism legislation if he becomes Wisconsin's next U.S. Senator. uss 11 Feinsold cont- to hand ;a ;a W ZgyBi ; Lzor . Wiscons in will suffer. i. ~i And so will the entire nation As a Wisconsin Stace Senator for 10 years, Mr. Feingold has voted with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for ..... !i : workers and small businesses every time. in One of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers, Mr. ...~.,-- .. Feingold sponsored and rmed through the Wisconsin Senate a -.. ~. .. -...... Pushbutton Strike bill. "clone" (S.B. 70) which, like U.S. Senator ..:..... Ted Kennedy's federal bill, would force employers to punish or .. even fire workers who resist union-boss strike orders. If Governor Tommy Thompson had not heeded Right to Work advocates' pleas to veto this bill, it would have incited violent strikes, increased Big Labor's power to force workers to pay union dues, and driven more businesses and good jobs out of the ..- .. Badger State. -... . :,i . -. State Senator Feingold has also actively pushed for a bill (S.B. 262) to strip University of Wisconsin employees of the right to bargain for tkemelves over their wages and benefits by forcing them to accept union "representation." Handing faculty union czars this monopoly bargaining privilege would bring the inflated costs, declining quality and bloated bureaucracy -- common in Wisconsin's union-boss ruled primary and secondary schools -- to higher education. pfr. Feiwwld*. be counted on to ba ck his uals in Biq Labor. Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal government. If the union political machine sweeps Wisconsin and just two other U.S. Senate seats into Big Labor's camp (and possibly the White House as well), Mr. Feingold couid cast the key vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law. He could vote to destroy all Right to Work laws by abolishing Section 14(b) of the Taft-HartleyAct, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, and force all governmenc: employees to pay union dues to swell Big Labor's golitical and organizing coffers. That's why I've already asked you to inundate Mr. Faingold with phone calls, letters and postcards. Thousands of angry Wisconsin citizens are now urging him to support Right to Work. But State Senator Feingold continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Russell Feingold ignoring you and the rest of the huge majoricy of Wisconsin citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? Maybe it's because Russell Peingold is up to his ears in union forced-dues "in-kind" campaign favors. Paul Gigot of the respected Wall Street Jawpoints out that Mr. Feingold is strongly backed by the big-time, big-money Wisconsin Education Association Council (YJEAC) teacher union. WEAC, a subsidiary of the National Education Association (NEA) union, has dumped hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of hidden "soft" money into Mr. Feingold's campaign in the form of partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time, paid "volunteers.'I WEAC has even lent one of its former officers, Morris Andrews, to Mr. Feingold as his campaign chairman. Until recently, Andrews was the top boss of YJEAC and is considered the heaviest of the heavyweight special interest lobbyists in Madison. Now he's there making certain Big Labor gains control of another Senator. So while Mr. Feingold is refusing to tell Bight to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. It's a simple (if sleazy) arrangement. He votes their way; they bankroll his State Legislative and ..~.. U.S. Senate campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American .~... workers. !. ....~.;.-.. F-mt a eS 0r Russell Feinqold now at (60B! 251- CU7 nd ur i ort for forced unionism. .. Only YQS?I protests can make Mr. Feingold renounce his cozy -.. . relationship with Big Labor. ... .- . ... Tell State Senator Feingold you won'c stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls Wisconsin citizens. Tell him he's not fooling -, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. On the other hand. Mr. FeinqQld'9 owoonent , R obert Kasten, aid resuond €0 h is survev qenerallv in favor of Riqht to Work. and almost alwavs votpd for Riqht to Work in the U.S. Senatp. Mr. Kasten has voted to SLQQ Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fought for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the u5e of forced dues for politics, opposed efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and supported a crackdown on strike violence. Unfortunately, Senator Kasten did vote to gut the Hatch Act. This bill would have allowed union officials to browbeat the 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers into supporting the union political machine. In 1991, Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-oldlaw. Now union czars are pressuring Mr. Kasten intensely to renounce all support for the Right to Work.

It's vital that vou urae Mr. Kasten to reconsider his~ support for-Hatch Act- repeai. pkae call him at (414) 354 -1OOQ and tell him th e ueou 1e of Wisconsin suuuort h'IS uledse on alL gther Risht to Work is=. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. State Senator Russell Feingold must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now is the time, in the face nf a tough U.S. Senate battle, when he is most likely to mend his ways. Pleaseax.i October 23, 1992 Dear Wisconsin Member: I'm writing you today because I'm very concerned about how State Senator Russell Feingold will vote on compulsory-unionism legislation if he becomes Wisconsin's next U.S. Senator. .. tor. Russell Feinsold cmcinues to haa forced-imipIllsm DO wers to B1.s Labor. Wisconsin will suffeq...... -:j...._ And so will the entire nation. ilj-. cF. -.. As a Wisconsin State Senator for LO years, Mr. Feingold has .. voted with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for .....c-: . i: workers and small businesses every time. One of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers,Mr. Feingold &- sponsored and rammed through the Wisconsin Senate a Pushbutton Strike bill "clone" (S.B. 70) which, like U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy's federal bill, would force employers to punish or even fire workers who resist union-boss strike orders. If Governor Tomy Thompson had not heeded Right to Work advocates' pleas to veto this bill, it would have incited violent strikes, increased Big Labor's power to force workers to pay union dues, and driven more businesses and good jobs out of the Badger State. State Senator Feingold has also actively pushed for a bill (S.B. 262) to strip University of Wisconsin employees of the right to bargain for themselves over their wages and benefits by forcing them to accept union "representation." Handing faculty union czars this monopoly bargaining privilege would bring the flated costs, declini quality and bloated bureaucracy c Wisconsin's unio& ruled education. primary and seconda&he s to higher education.

Mr, Feincxold's record C learlv acates that h e cou~J.d-& Labor. counted on to back walsin Bis Labor. Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal government. If the union political machine sweeps Wisconsin and just two other U.S. Senate seats into Big Labor's camp (and possibly the White House as well), Mr. Feingold could cast the key vOte to enact the entire union-boss political qenda into law. He could vote to destroy all Right to work laws by abolishing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, and force all government employees to pay union dues to swell Big Labor's political and organizing coffers. That's why I've already asked you to inundate Mr. Feingold with phone calls, letters and postcards. Thousands of angry Wisconsin citizens are now urging him to support Right to Work. But State Senator Feingold continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Russell Feingold ignoring you and the roqt of the huge majority of Wisconsin citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? se Russell Feingold is up to his ears in campaign favors. Paul Gigot of the points out that Mr. Feingold is strongly backed by the big-time, big-money Wisconsin Education &sociation Council (WEAC) teacher union. WEAC, a subsidiary of the National Education Association (NEA) union, has dumped hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of hidden "soft" money into Mr. Feingold's campaign in the form of paftisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time, paid "volunteers." has even lent one of its former officers, Morri Mr. Feingold as his campaign chairman. Until recen Andrews was the top boss of WAC and is considered the heaviest of the heavyweight special interest lobbyists in Madison. Now he's of another kenator. I&. So while Mr. Feingold is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. It's a simple (if sleazy) arrangement. He votes their way; they bankroll his State Legislative and U.S. Senace campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American workers. Please ca11 State Senator Russell Feinsold now at (608) 251- 7800 an d urqe h'm1 to reuudiate his' su uuor tf or f orced u n'ion isrn . Only protests can make Mr. Feingold renounce his cozy relationship with Big Labor. Tell Stace Senator Feingold you won't stand for his political dircy pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- .. ~~ ~~. .. . while he stonewalls Wisconsin citizens. Tell him he's rLot ...... ~...... fooling gnvbody, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues.

Qn the other hand. Mr. Feinqold's ODDO nent . Robert Kast e2L did r esnond to his survev se nerallv in fva or of to Work and almost alwavs voted for Risht to Work in the 1J.S" Senate. Mr. Kasten has voted to Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fought for tougher enforcemenr. of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, opposed efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, a Cdown on strike violence. Unfortunately, Senator Kasten did he Hatch Act. This bill would have allowed union offi beat the 2.9 million federal employees and thousands supporting the union polit' machine. just two votes shy of corr Ih g enough President Bush's veto and 53 the 53-year-oldlzw. Now union czars are pressuring Mr. Kasten intensely to renounce all support for the Right to Work. It's vital that you urge Mr. Kasten to reconsider his support for Hatch Act repeal. -2e call him at 414) 354 -1000 and tell him the ueoule of Wisconsin suuuort his uledse on alL gther Riqht to Work issues. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S State Senator Russell Feingold must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now is the time, in the face of a tough U.S. Senate battle, when he is most mend his ways. 6 , please caL 1 him today. October 23. 1992 Dear Wisconsin Member: I'm writing you today because I'm very concerned abouz how State Senator Russell Feingold will vote on compu1sorqr;unionism legislation if he becomes Wisconsin's next U.S. Senator. =-+-?J.S; sen";:;, Rus sell Fcmuold continufs to hand forced-unionism u wers io Labor. Wiscons in will suffer. I .ok And so will the entire nation. As a Wisconsin State Senator for 10 years, Mr. Faingold has j i::; voted with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses every time.

1 i;.. I -- #ne of Big Labor's most reliable water carriers Mr. Feingold I 9.. ored and rammed through the Wisconsin Senate a 6ushbutton ..2 :> (S.8. 70) , ..ii . Strike bill "clone" which, like U.S. Senator Ted ...... Kennedy's federal bill, would force employers to punish or even fire workers who resist union-boss strike orders. Thompson had not heeded Right to Work advocates' pleas to veto this bill, it would have incited violent strikes, increased Big Labor's power to force workers to pay union dues, and driven more businesses and good jobs out of the Badger State. State Senator Feingold has also actively pushed for a bill (S.B. 262) to strip University of Wisconsin employees of the right to bargain for themselves over their wages and benefits by 0 forcing them to accept union "representation- / Handing faculty union czars this monopoly bargaining privilege would briy the inflated costs, declining quality and bloated bureaucracy,comon in Wisconsin's unionfioss;;ruled primary and secondary schoolsPito higher education. 1 Mr. Feinaold 's record clearly indicates that he could be rounted on to back Walsin B is Labor.- Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal government. If the union political machine sweeps Wisconsin and just two other U.S. Senate seats into Big Labor's camp (and possibly the White House as well), Mr. Feingold could cast the key vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law. He could vote to destroy all Right to Work laws by abolishing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, and force all government employees to pay union clues tc swell Big Labor's political and organizing coffers. That's why I've already asked you to inundate Mr. Feingold with phone calls, letters and postcards. Thousands of angry Wisconsin citizens are now urging him to support Right to Work. But State Senator Feingold continues to stonevall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Russell Feicgold ignoring you and the rest of the huge majority of Wisconsin citizens who oppose compulsory unionism? ause Russell Feingold is up to his ears in "in-kind"campaign favors Paul Gigot of the et JQU~a?, points out thai/Mr. Feingold is k strongly backed by the big-time, big-money Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC) teacher union. WAC, a subsidiary of the National Education Association (NE% union, has dumped hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of hidden "soft'moneyPinto Mr. Feingold's campaign in the form of - partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time, paid ,'volunteer9 - WEAC has even lent one of its former officers nl/ Andrewsyto Mr. Feingold as his cmuaiqn chairman. indrews was un QiintiT recent1 tne ~opboss of W6AC and 1s consdred the heaviest o t e heavyweight special interest lobbyists in t&dison.)yiw EIs there making certain Big Labor gains control ofQ&k

o while Mr. Feingold is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know he'll vote any way they say. NR It's a simple (ifjlsleazyi arrangement. He votes their way; they bankroll his State Legislative and ...- U.S. Senate campaigns with force+union dues stolen from Americana<- .. . .~.. workers. ,l :...... ~ . .. Please cal 1 State Senator 7800 and urge him to remdiate ...... relationship with Big Labor. ...~~.. Tell State Senator Feingold you won't stand for his ... i political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- ..~ ...... > ~~ : while he stoarwalls Wisconsin citizens. Tell him he's not : := fooling w,and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues.

bill, fought for tougher enforcement of the Su reme Court's ()e on the use of forced dues for politics, oppossefforts to requir ::Ake public servants to pay union dues, andjciack&wn on strike 6@-- violence. s-Q- Unfortunately, Senator Kasten did vote to gut the Hatch Act. This bill would have allowed uxion officials to browbeat the 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. tz---- L? supporting the union political machine.#In 19@, aig Labor came -- just two votes shy of corralhg enough senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-oldlaw. - Now union czars are pres g Mr. Kasten intensely t renounce all support for the

Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. State Senator Russell Feingold must feel the heat from concerned citizens Like you to stop votiq to force workers in the face of a tough likelypend his ways. & (mm:WEN NO LONGER IN ROUTING, CO14pLFpED SHEET; WITH COPY ATTACHED, MUST BE FlLED APPROPR+ATEeY.J October 23, 1992 c Dear Wisconsin Member: I'm writing you today because I'm very concerned about how State Senator Russell Feingold will vote on compu1sory;unionism legislation if he becomes Wisconsin's next U.S. Senator. - If. a3 a U.S . Senator, Russel 1 Feinsold continues to hand,

.. And so will the entire nation. ._...... As a Wisconsin State Senator for 10 years, Mr. Feingold has voted with the union hierarchy and against individual freedom for zip workers and small businesses eveiy time.

... Abneof Big Labor's most reliable water carriers,Mr. Feingold

.~~ ?5 sponsored and rmed through the Wisconsin Senate a Pushbutton . Strike bill "clone" (S.B. 70) which, like U.S. Senator Ted 3P .-...... Kennedy's federal bill, would force employers to punish or even fire workers who resist union-boss strike orders. Thompson had not heeded Right to Work acivocates' pleas to veto this bill, it would have incited violent ? strikes, increased Big Labor's power to force workers to pay

.... ~ union dues, and driven more businesses and good jobs out of the L..: L..: Badger State. i,iii... a . ....~ State Senator Feingold has also actively pushed for a bill (S.B. 262) to strip University of Wisconsin employees of the right to bargain for themselves over their wag s and benefits by forcing them to accept union "representatiod Handing faculty union czars this monopoly bargaining privilege would bring the inflated costs, declininq quality and bloated bureaucracyrcomon in Wisconsin's union-boss ruled 41 primary and second&y schoolsFto higher education. - I, UL Feinqold's record clearlv indicates that he could b e counted on to ba ck has uals in Bis Labor, - Organized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal governvent. If the union political machine sweeps Wisconsin and just two other U.S. Senate seats into Big Labor's camp (and possibly the White House as well), Mr. Feingold could cast the key vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law. He could vote to destroy all Right to Work laws by abolishing Section 14(b) of the Taft-HartleyAct, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, and force all government employees to pay union dues to swell Big Labor's political and organizing coffers. That's why I've already asked you to inundate Mr. Feingold with phone calls, letters and postcards. Thousands of angry Wisconsin citizens are now urging him to support Right to Work. But State Senator Feingold continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Russell Feingold ignoring you and the rest of the huge majority of Wisconsin citizens who oppose compulsory unionism?

,/ respected Wall Street Journal points out that Mr. Feingold is strongly backed by the big-time, big-money Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC) teacher union. VEAC, a subsidiary of the National Education Association (?TEA) union, ed hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of nto Mr. Feingold's campaign in tne form ot partisan get-out- e-vote drives, phone banks, and full-time, paid "volunteer&: - - WEAC has even lent one of its former officers, Morris -?+ ARdrewslto Mr. Feingold as his campaign chairnan. drews was 11 recent1 the top boss of WEAC and is consicle%d the viest of tge heavyweight special interest lobbyists in MadisondNow he's there making certain Biz Labor gains control of 3 another Senator. So while Mr. Feingold is,refusingto tell Right to Work .~...... supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbyists know .. - he'll vote any way they say. .. It's a simple (idsleazy) arrangement. .. 0 :.. .. 9 He votes their wa', they bankroll his State Legislative and U.S. Senate campaigns with forcedenion dues stolen from American .. workers. .~. - .. 1- e:-: Please call State Senator Russell Feinsold now at (608) 251- , 7800 and urue him to reuudiate his surmort for C orced un ionism. Only protests can make Mr. Feingold renounce his cozy (-$ L.- relationship with Big Labor. -...... Tell State Senator Feingold you won't stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- .., while he stonewalls Wisconsin citizens. Tell him he's not ...... ~.. _I fooling snvbody, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to !i - < pay union dues. On the other hand. Mr, Feinsold's ovaorient. Robert Kasten. :A Pi8 resDond:A i in f vo Ri t Wr 8n.d ost a1wavs voted for Riuht to Work in t CI. $3 ah he Mr. Kasten has voted to Ted KeMedy'S Pushbutton Strike bill, fought for tougher enforcement of the Supreme- Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, oppogedefforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and,cracM?down on strike 4 violence. S.E,&na DC Unfortunately, Senator Kasten did vote to gut the Hatch Act. This bill would have allowed union officials to browbeat the 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers into supporting the union political machine. In 1990, Big Labor came just two votes shy of corraling enough senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-oldlaw. Now union czars are pressuring Mr. Kasten intensely to renounce all support for the Right to Work. It's vital that you urge Mr. Kasten to reconsider hi3 - e support for Hatch Act repeal.d-aac (5081 21 7-1444 and tP11 the Dede of Wiscons in su~x~or~&isD lpdse on au other Riaht to Work issue+ Sincerely,

Reed Larson

P.S. State Senator Russell Peincrold must feel the heat from .. \ concerned citizens like yo; to stop votina to fnwe UK to pay union dues.'Now is the time, in the face of a- U.S. Senate battle. when he is most likelv mend his ways. call him todav. FROM:

HAVE ALL RECOMMENDED CHANGES BEEN MADE? 0 YES 0 NO

PROOFING:

1ST )d. &3 REVISION NEEDED qv 4

2N Y /tl 23 REVISION NEEDED L REVISION NEEDED b7

REVISION NEEDED

REVlSIOPJ NEEDED

REVISION NEEDED

FINAL COPY APPROVED? w?ES 0 NO DATE: U.S. Senate Questions#: 123456789 Questions#: 123456789 Dlstslct 3 Diotrict I Questions #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Paul Sacia-D ------David Obey-I? ------Russell Feingold-D ------Steven Gunderson-R ------Dale Vannes-R YYYYYYYYY

~ Roberr Xasten, 3r.-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y - Y 1 Dbtz’iat 4 DbtXlCt 8 Gerald Kleczkd-D ------Catherine Helms-D ------’i U.S. House of Representatives Joseph Cook-R YYYYYYYYY Toby Roth-R YYYYYYYYY auesuons1: 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 ni.trict 5 District 9 Dietriot 1 Thomas Bdrrett-D ------Ingrid Buxton-D ------ksAspin-D ------Donalda Ann James Hark Neumann-R Y-YYYYYYY Hammersmit h-R YYYYYYYYY Sensenbrenner, Jr.-R - Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y .... r&rlct 2 nmiat 6 $a Deer-D ------Peggy Lautenschlager-D ------Scott Klug-R ------Thomas Petri-R ------.. ..

.. ..~...... ~......

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of consmction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of Ih.: Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the federal anti-extonion statue? 9. firing of employees who choose to work during a soike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

~~ ~ Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We aie a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to Icnow which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. BACKGROUNDER The information hlow is helpful in explaining the questions on the revery: side of lhis form. i 1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating hack to represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the administration of President John F. Kennedy. 1 unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t Labor unions are the only private orgaization in the US. ~ want its “services.” which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as UeaSurieS. ~ “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly for fedepal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. candidate .. .. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use ..-,: Such complaints intended to pave the way for compelling are workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political .-i.- Ci . facial support from so-called “free riders” for representation spending on goods and sewices to elect candidates for federal :-.. they do not want offices. The f~ngof workers who refuse. to pay union dues and/or These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition to union PAC fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor contributions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or

i-, ~ Relations Act and the National Railway Labor ACL reported to the Federal Eietion Commission. :&.... Section 7 of the NLRA, for example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union “in-kind“ expenditures employees shall have “the right to rem &om participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Rim1 estimated that union activities “except to the extent that such right may be this so-called “soft money’’ amounted to 10 times more than affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick. union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. ..-. The problem of compulsory unionism was created by In recent years, legislation has been introduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the m automatically impose union representation upon workers of .?:.. ~ . existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest 5:: In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws. saying, “The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by be account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Lahr Relations Board to determine worker support. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legislation would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union orzmkers to use reaffirmed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse 110 picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractors at a job site. Q. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency“ shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union offlcials the level. some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servints in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce. have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so impomnt tha they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter, maiming, arson. aggravated property destruction, Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would to explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - obtain collective prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers bargaining demands. during a srike. 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to strike by giving preferential, post-strike hirifig employees at various levels of govemenL privileges to skikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at sfate, county and Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent strike under lhese conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in (0 every demand by union officials Other bills would sVip postal workers and other federal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal dues be fired. WI

U.S. Senat9 Questions #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Questions#: 123456589 (\ District 4 DebtB Questions# 123456789 Gerald Xleczka-D ------Carherine Helms-D ------’ fiussell Feingold-D ------Joseph Cook-R YYYYYYYYY Toby Roth-R YYYYYYYYY i Robert Kasten, Jr.-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y - Y Dei& 5 Dbtrlat 9 ! Questions#: 123456789 Thomas Barrett-D ------Ingrid Buxton-D ------Distriat 1 Donaida Ann James ’ Les Aspin-D ------Hammer smit h-R YYYYYYYYY Sensenbrenner, JK.-R -YYYYYYYY .%rk Neumann-R Y-YYYYYYY DintrM 6 aistriat 2 Peggy Lautenschlager-D ------Ada Deer-D ------Thomas Petri-R _--_I---- ;Spt Klug-R ------... .. ~~ DMxict 7 Shtriat 3 David Obey-D ------I ?Paul Sacia-D ------Dale Vannes-R YYYYYYYYY ;Steven Gunderson-R ------..i. ~

...... ~......

.... .~......

Survey Questisns

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative. which federal law now and fees foe political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support re@ of the provisions in federal laws which Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act. which aulhorizes state Right to Work Jaws? Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy rhe Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the f~ngor” employees who choose to work during a sbike. and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? mfuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

1. A union. under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the administration of President John F. Kennedy. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t want its “services.” 6. Labor unions are the only private organization in the U.S. which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as UeaSurieS. “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (ECA) prohibits union bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power to officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” represent nonmembers. to At the 5ame time, FECA permits union officials to use I.~. Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ compulso~ydues dollars for “in-kind” political . :: financial support from so-called “free riders” for representation spending on goods and services to elect candidates for federal they do not want. offices. 2. The f~ngof workers who refuse to pay union dues andlor These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition to union PAC fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor contributions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act reponed to the Federal Election Commission. Section 7 of the NLRA, for example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union “in-kid” expenditures employees shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimaPed that union activities “except to the extent that such tight may be. this so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more than affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft money’’ in 1990 exceeded $350 million. The problem compulsory unionism was created by of 7. In recent years, legislation has introduced in Cofigress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the been to automatically impose union representation upon workers of existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest In 21 states, wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded fmm compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perfom separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws. saying, “The conmct would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shdl not be denied or abridged on workers, without even ihe show of an election conducted by rhe account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board tn determine worker support. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legislation would also encounge The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use reaffirmed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractors at a job site. 1. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress to officiah in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union officials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter. maiming, arson. aggravated property destruction, 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers bargaining demands. during a strike. 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to strike by giving preferential, post-smke hiring employees at various levels of government. privileges to strikers. Several of lhese proposals are aimed at state, county and Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent suike under these conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in 10 every demand by union officials Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal dues be fired. I Wisconsin conf. i I\(ebraskacont. Questions#: 123456789 Questions#: 123456709

DMrict 3 Questions#: 123456789 Lowell Flsher-D ------Russel: Feingold-D ------Bill Barrett-R YYYYYYYYY Robert Kasten, Jr.-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y - Y Questions#: 123456789 nmM1 James Les Aspin-D ------Sensenbrennee, Jr.-R - Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U.S. Senate Mark Neumann-R Y-YYYYYYY Questions#: 123456789 nk+rM 2 - - Ada Deer-D __------Byron Dorgan-D ------Scott Kluq-R _------Steve Sydness-R YYYYYYYYY U.S. Mouse of Representatives Dbt?A.at 3 ------Paul Sacia-D - - - Questions# 123456789 Steven Gunderson-R ------Earl Pomeroy-D ------1: ;fohn Xorsmo-R YYYYYYYYY niatziat 4 Gerald iUeczka-D ------.....,. .. . Joseph Cook-R YYYYYYYYY

.. Dlstriat 5 ....~. Thomas~~~ Bdrrett-D ------US. Senate Donalda Ain Hamersmith-R YYYYYYYYY .. QuesUons#: 123456789 z.. i~:Tom Daschle-D ------DMrict 6 Z-~Charlene.. Haar-R YYYYYYYYY ------.. Peqqy LaJtenschlaqer-D .. Thomas Petri-R ------= US. House of Representatives Key: .~.~. Y =Yes ..~. District 7 -. .~ Questions#: 123456789------David Obey-D N =NO L:'Tim Johnson-D Dale Vannes-3 =PloResponse ..John Timer-R YYYYYYYYY - ...... ~.~. .. . .~... ~.. ~..

BACKGRQWER The information below is helpFu1 in explaining the questions on the reverse side of this form. P c s GR 5 I Minnesota cont. US. Senate U.S. Senate Questionst: 123456789 Timothy Dr0ogs1~1-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Questions#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 78 9 Questions#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1507) 387-7801 Jean Lloyd-Jones4 ------Geri Rochman-Serot-D ------Bond-R ------David Minge-D --_--____ U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House ob Representatives (612) 269-e863 Cal Ludeman-R YYYYYYYYY Questions#: 123456789 Questions#: 123456789 (507) 354-1994 DLtrict 1 DirrrM 1 Jan Zonneveld-D NNY-YYYYY William Clay-D DMrkh 3 Jim Leach-R YYYYYYYYY Arthur Monegcmery-R Paul Mandell-D Jim Ramstad-R District 2 DintxM 2 (612) 884-0266 David Nagle-D NNNNNNNNN Joan Horn-D Jim Nussle-R YYYYYYYYY James Talent-R DiprLriat 4

:.~ .. Bruce Vento-D :.&tziat 3 Distriat 3 (612) 225-4577 LCiXlaine.. . Baxter-D Richard Gephardt-D Ian Maitland-R

_I (6121 645-8412 .~ Jim Ldghtfoot-R Mack Holekamp-R .~~. .. i* ;Di8tri& 4 Dirt-M 1 DL3tri.A 5 =Neal Smith-D Ike Skelton-D Martin Sabo-D :. Paul Lunde-R John Carley-R Stephen Moriarty-R

Dirrriut 5 Dintxiat 6 Alan Wheat-D Gerry Sikcrski-D Edward Moody-R Rod Grams-R (612) 422-8570 ..~. ... Dl&rict 6 ...... Pat Danner-D ------__ nimeriat 7 .. Tom Coleman-R ------Collin Peterson-D U.S. Senate Bernie Omann-R ...... Dlrtrict 1 (612) 654-6911 .. Questions #: 1 2 3 9 5 6 7 8 8 Patrick Deaton-D --_----__ :i Gloria O‘Dell-D --_------.. Eel Hancock-R YY Y Y Y Y Y YY DbME --..mb Dole-R YYYYYYYYY ------Phil Herwig-R ------U.S. House of Representatives :Esltck-DYYYYYYYYY (612) 369-4143 QuesUonsAl: 123456789 Bill Emerson-R --YYYYY-Y DiDtriat 1 Duane West-D Pat Roberts-R U.S. House of Representatives Dbtrict 2 Jim Slattery-D QuestionsI: 123456789 Jim Van Slyke-R Diatsict 1 ~~~~~~ Gerrv Finneaan-D ------DlEtriCt 3 U.S. House of Representatives (402; 477-3j30 Tom Love-D Doua Bereuter-R Y YY YY YY-Y Jan Meyers-R YYYYYYYNY Questions I:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DintrM 1 DMrbct 2 Distriat 4 Tim Penny-D - ----I - - ~ - Peter Hoagland-D ------Dan Glickman-D --y ___--_ 1507) 835-1184 Ron Staskiewicz-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Eric Ycst-R YYYYYYYYY

Note: The National Right 10 Work Comminee. of course. endorses no candidas. We are a nonpartunn orgnnization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to ema living - without having to pay unionbosses for the privilege. Nebraska cont. Wisconsin cont I Questions I:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 Questions I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Diat.riat 8 District 3 ~uestians~~:123456789 Catherine Helms-D ------Lowell Fisher-D ------Russell Feingold-D ------Toby Roth-R YYYYYYYYY - Bill Barrett-R YYYYYYYYY Robe Dintxiat 9 eslionstt: 123456789 Ingrid Buxton-D ------D+strid 1 James Les Aspin-D Sensenbrenner. Jr.-R - Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y - U.S. Senate Mark Neumann-R Questions#: 123456789 DLtrict 2 Ada Deer-D Byron Dorqan-D ------Steve Sydness-R YYYYYYYYY Scott Klug-R US. House of Representatiwes Dintriat 3 Paul Sacia-D QuestianScI: 123456789 Steven Gunderson-R Earl Pomeroy-D ------John Korsmo-R Y Y YY Y YYY Y District 4 Gerald Kleczka-D Joseph Cook-R

Diatxiut 5 Thomas Bacrett-D U.S. Senate Donalda Ann Hammersmith-R - Questions 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 - Tom Daschle-D ------District 6 Charlene Haar-R YYYYYYYYY Peggy LauLenschlager-D U.S. House of Representatives Thomas Pecri-R Key: District 1 Y =Yes auestions#: 1 23456789 - - David Obey-D N =No Tlm .Johnson-D ------Dale Vannes-R John Timer-R YYYYYYYYY - =NoResponse , ..ii

F-.i .. ,_:zi BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION i....~ I* . , i: In the Matter of ) -....-:- .... Witness Subpoena to ) MUR 3774 .. _.-.. The National Right to) ...... Work Committee ) :E.9 !

DOCUMENTS FROM NRTWC

Supplemental Submission in Response to Letter from FEC dated 9/4/97

Item I.c. 310 Swann Avenue Alexandria. VA 22301 (703)683.3105

National Right to Work ;OLD TO: 8001 Praddock Road

Springfield, VA 22160 ..:; .

AMOUNT .. DESCRlPTlON .... . -....5.:: i. NEW AD MAILING

.. 13,i)OO pages paper 852 -.., Copies, print 2 un White 00 .. 20,000 Copies, print 2 pages on Blue paper, cut 730. 00 I ..i: .. and fold Z~.,.. . ,.~...... ~.- 13,500 Copies, print 1 page on White paper and 629.00 fold

1,725 Pre-printed letters folded 19.00

Fas Fax to Sisk 112.00

2342.00 SUBTOTAL - ,I u IT for your order. We have given it our very careful I attention. We appreciate your conlidence in us, 2342.00 I and look forward to sewing you again soon. 1 , , .~.!, .... . , .~: .. ..

pi . ~. ..1..

..- .. ..-. .

s GR 5 Minnesota conk U.S. Senate US. Senate Questions Y: 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Timothy Droogsma-R YYYYYYYYY QuestlonsP: 123456789 QueoUonsII: 123456789 (507) 387-7801 ;em Lloyd-Jones-D ------Geri Rothn-Serot-D ------Charles Grassley-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Christopher Bond-R ------Dietrbst 2 David Minge-D U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives (6121 269-8863 Cal Ludeman-R aues~ons~:123456789 Questions#: 123456789 (507) 354-1994 Wrbt 1 Dintxiat 1 Jan Zonnoveld-D NNY-YYYYY Willlam Clay-D Dietriot 3 Jim Leach-R YYYYYYYYY Arthur Montqmery-R Paul Mandell-D Jim Ramstad-R Distriat 2 DLttM 2 (612) 884-0266 David Nagle-D NNNNNNNNN Joan Horn-D Jim Nussle-R YYYYYYYYY James Talent-R Diatriat 4 Bruce Vento-D Diatriut 3 Dkr+rM 3 (6121 225-4577 Elalne Baxter-D ------Richard Gephardt-D Ian Plaitland-R Jim Liqhtfoot-R YYYYY YYYY Hack Holekarp-R (612) 645-8412

Diutriat I DL+rict 4 Dirtriot 5 Neal Smith-D ------_- Ike Skelton-D Martin Sabo-D Paul Lunde-R YYYYYYYYY John Carley-R Stephen Moriarty-R

District 5 Dircriat J Dietriot 6 Fred Grandy-R ------Alan Wheat4 Gerry Sikorski-D Edward Moody-R Rod Grdms-R (6121 422-8570 Dintxiat 6 Pat Danner-D Dintriot 7 Tom Coleman-R Collin Peters0.i-D U.S. Senate Bernie Omann-R Questions #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Diotrfct I 1612) 654-6911 Gloria O'Dell-D ------Patrick Deacon-D Me1 Hancock-R Dintriot 8 Ebb Dole-R Y YYYY YYYY James Oberstar-D House of Representatives DLtrict 9 Phil Herwiq-R U.S. Thad Sullock-D YYYYYYYYY 1612) 369-4143 Questions#: 123456789 Bill Emrson-R --YYYYY-Y DIstri& X Duane Ws:-D ------DLtrieP 9 Pat RobeKtS-R YYYYYYYYY Harold Volkmer-D NEBRASKA Rick Hardy-R US. House of Representatives Ustrlat 2 Jim Slattery-D ------Questions I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Jim Van Slyke-R YYYYYYYYY Dbtrkt 1 ~~~~~~~~~ Gerry Finneqan-D ------Di<rirR3 U.S. House of Representatives (402) 477-3730 Tom Love-D ------Doug Bereucer-R YYYYYYY-Y Jan Meyers-R YYYYYYYNY Questions#: 123456789 Di8trLot z Dirtxiat 2 Dintriat 4 Tim Penny-D ---- ~ ---- Peter Hoaqland-D ------Dan Clickman-D --y ------(507) 835-1184 Ron Staskiewicz-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Eric Yost-R YYYYYYYYY Survey Questions 1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "services" of a 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act to labor union should have the right to refuse lo accept that union as his prohibit the use of compulsory union dues and fees for political causes exclusive representative, which federal law now forces him to accept? and candidates opposed by union members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called "antidouble breasting" legislation that has. aulhorite compulsory unionism? ~f its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. companies? which authorizes state Right to Work laws? E. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act. which 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity union protecrs federal employees horn union political coercion? officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal anti- 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the faing of extomon statute? employees who choose to work during a strike. and give union officials 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state. county and the power 10 shut down businesses that refuse to force their employees municipal employees? &pay union due57

~ ~~- Note: The National Right u) Work Conunittee, of come. endones no candidates. We arc a nonpanisan organization. But we believe that you ss a Right to Work supponer are entided to how which candidam will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having LO pay union bosses for the privilege. I .. -...... ? - .. ilEmcrg Citzn Act. Rep. 1 up10/92 1 Page 1

From:

To : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22160 ! Reed : With Bill Clinton vowing to destroy Right to Work, and with Big Labor on the verge of buying a lock grip on the U.S. Senate, I want to helo turn the heat all the way up on Governor Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate. I have: __ Called Governor Bill Clinton and the candidates for the U.S. Senate - Enclosed a contribution to pay for the ads you are already running in newspapers across the nation: - $1,000 - $500 - $200 - $100

__. $25 - Other ($ 1

Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC. a- =Y ARPROVALIPROQFING CEB2K -OFF

(ATTACH TO COPY WITH Jsi) ROUTE TO8 ---

DATE lo -23- 92 PACKAGE : /?TU43 G : FROH > CHECK OFF IF . . . ROUTED TO: APPROVED BY8

HLW _II SOG - kI, RJC ALL RECOWNDED CHANGES MADE: YES NO TO PROOFING: CHANGES MADE BY: 1ST SbG 2ND P$/LM '$3/7~ .P 3

IO 3RD Qc\L" ft3/9- L

WLP/FACT CHECK (PROOFING SEND SEPARA.TE COPY) REC'D: APPROVED : October 26, 1992

Dear Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy . Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify all 21 state Right to Work laws. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Attached, please find a copy of the advertisement we are running in Right to Work states across the country. In some states, I have borrowed money to pay for the ad. In others, our tight finances have forced r.e to simply ask editors to run the ad as a public service. (Even if they won't run the ad for free, I hope our requests will prompt some favorable editorials.) I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads in Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab. But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his family. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate ...... -..:> candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still ..... listening. :_:-_ ?. b .. ir: :.j Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMPlIEDIATELY at 1 (800) .. 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wroiig, and economically disastrous for America. i-. r ... And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. I_. *:: ..~.- .. :...~.... The future of Right to Work may depend on it.

.. .._. . Sincerely, ...... L i:

Dear Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy . Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Secti.on 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws...... ::_. - ...-...... ~.-. I have taken emergency action to alert citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify all 21. state Right to Work laws. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory uni.onism. Attached, please find a copy of the advertisement we are running in Right to Work states across the country. In some states, I have borrowed money to pay for the ad. In others, our tight finances have forced me to simply ask editors to run the ad as a public service. (Even if they won't run the ad for free, I hope our requesTwill prompt some favorable - editorials.) I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads in Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab. i But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence wiil not al-low me to go any further &adebt. !i i Please help me make the politicians,who support compulsory unionism,feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who @ believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed I his familv. I We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate 1I candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still

~ listening. 1 -=? 1 i'.. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is 1 ...... morally wrong, and economically disastrous for America. i a:

1 i;~.. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to

.. ~ ~ ..!.~ help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising .. .~~ ..__ . blitz. The future of Right to Work may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills all 21 state Right to Work laws by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, thousands of American jobs will be lost or driven overseas. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. Dear Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. .. r: i : it Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union ii... bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a loc grip over j %. the U.S. Senate. 2 i Y .,i%i If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House i -., and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in

.~ .. .. . 5; jeopardy . ._...... ir i Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal =-.- . Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section si+7:._ 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws ... .: ... -, taken emergency aiert citizens that inton intends to all 21 state Right to Work w to mobilize public n Clinton to back away from is support for compulsoni unionism. p;,( Attached, please find a copy of the advertisement we are running in Right to Work states across the country. In some states, I have borrowed money to pay for the ad. In others, our tight finances have forced me to simply ask editors to run the ad as a public service. (Even if they won't run the ad for free, I hope our requesuwill prompt some favorable - editorials. ) h I am doing everrything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads in Right to work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people dlw&bto Big Labor's impending powe grab. / 9- But I need your additional support right away to cover the 7 costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further &&) 0debt. v' --- Please help me make the politicians,who support compulsory - unionismVfeel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe /that no one should ever be forced to ioin a union to feed his family. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still Si.! listening, ,.. ::

c-. $ .. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) ...... 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is ..I . : morally wrong, and economically disastrous for America.

... .. : .. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to ....., .~ help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising .-...... !~.: blitz.

.....~. __.. The future of Right to Work may depend on it. .. ..-. -._. . Sincerely, ..... -.~.....- 3dl ...... flY .-... Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills all 21 state Right to Work laws by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, thousands of American jobs'will be lost or driven overseas. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. Dear Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. t,.-__ .. - If Organized Labor takes control over both the white House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy . Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right- to Work laws. Pf&q &-L tWJ I have taken emergency alert citizens that Governor Clinton intends to all 21 state Right to Work ! lawsrgnd'to mobilize public pressure on Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. %;I Attached, please find a copy of the advertisement we are running in Right to Work states across the country. In some states, I have borrowed money to pay for the ad. In others, our tight finances have forced me to simply ask editors to run the ad as a public service. (Even if they won't run the ad for free, I hope our request will prompt some favosable editorials.) I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads in Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending powe But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further in debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate .. candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still ..L.: .. . listening. ..?.. : -. !- , 7; (800) I j= Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 ._...... 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for America. .. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. The future of Right to Work may depend on it. Sincerely,

c_ .i Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills all 21 state Right to Work laws by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, thousands of American jobs will be lost or driven overseas. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. October 26, 1992

Dear Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy . Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he’ll work to repeal. Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify all 21 state Right to Work laws. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. Attached, please find a copy of the advertisement we are running in Right to Work states across the country. In some states, I have borrowed money to pay for the ad. In others, our tight finances have forced me to simply ask editors to run the ad as a public service. (Even if they won’t run the ad for free, I hope our requests will prompt some favorable editorials.) I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads in Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee’s financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor’s impending power grab. But I need your additional support right away to cover the , costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further I into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to ioin a union to feed his family. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they’re still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for America. And if you can, please send a special contribdtion today tQ help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz.

.. .~ --. .. .- The future of Right to Work may depend on it. i:

;--.~. Sincerely, ...-

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills all 21 state Right to Work laws by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, thousands of American jobs will be . lost or driven overseas. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads.

HLlJ SOG ar,

3RD

I WLP/FACT COPY) October 26, 1992 Dear North Carolina Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert North Carolina citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. In case you missed it, I#veattached a copy of the advertisement we are running this week in the Raleigh News & Observer and the Greensboro News & Record. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in North Carolina, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab. But I need your additional support right away to caver the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support COmpUlSOry unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to ioin if union to feed his farnilv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for North Carolina. And call Senator Terry Sanford, a candidate for North Carolina's U.S. Senate seat, and urge him to publicly oppose compulsory unionism and defend your Right to Work law. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. North Carolina's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of North Carolina jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay €or running the attached newspaper ads. October 26, 1992 Dear Georgia Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out cornp1ete:ly to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to ezact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Georgia citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. In case you missed it, I've attached a copy of the advertisement we are running this week in the Albany Herald. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Georgia, but also in other Right to 'Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab. But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support cornpulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his family.- We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they’re still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for Georgia. And call Senator Wyche Fowler, a candidate for Georgia’s U.S. Senate seat, and urge him to publicly oppose compulsory unionism and defend your Right to Work law. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Georgia’s Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Georgia jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. October 26, 1992 Dear Nevada Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poiaed to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Nevada citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. In case you missed it, I've attached a copy of the advertisement we are running this week in the Elko Press and the Reno Gazette Journal. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Nevada, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab. But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a unior, to feed his family.- We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they*re still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for Nevada. And call Senator Harry Reid, a candidate for Nevada's U.S. Senate seat, and urge him to publicly oppose compulsory unionism and defend your Right to Work law. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Nevada's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Nevada jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. October 26, 1992 Dear Idaho Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip OVEP the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Idaho citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. In case you missed it, I've attached a copy of the advertisement we are running this week in the Boise Idaho Statesman, the Idaho Falls Post-Reqister and the Twin Falls Times News. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Idaho, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab. But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any fxrther into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support CompulsO- unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his familv.

c. ".... We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate ...... candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still ...~ listening...... ;: ! Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) .. 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is .... morally wrong, and economically disastrous for Idaho. And call Congressman Richard Stallings, a candidate for Idaho's U.S. Senate seat, and urge him to publicly oppose compulsory unionism and defend your Right to Work law. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising blitz. Idaho's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Idaho jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. October 26, 1992 Dear Utah Member: Right to Work is in deep trouble. Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a lock grip over the U.S. Senate. If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in jeopardy -- including your own. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work laws. I have taken emergency action to alert Utah citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. In case you missed it, I've attached a copy of the advertisement we are running this week in the Ogden Standard Examiner. Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to help us cover the costs of running these ads not only in Utah, but also in other Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab. But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further into debt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still ._.. listening...... :: Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMG'DIATELY at 1 (800) *. ..-. 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is -. ..-.. ..~. morally wrong, and economically disastrous for Utah. .:..: j. . And call Congressman Wayne Owens, a candidate for Utah's U.S. Senate seat, and urge him to publicly oppose compulsory ....- ..~ .~..:... unionism and defend your Right to Work law.

__.. . And if you can, please send a special contribution today to .._. ..-.~. help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising i i; blitz. Utha's Right to Work law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands of Utah jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. October 26, 1992 5i& Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXX Member:

1 -.__ - Right to Work is in deep trouble. I ....,=; .. ! ...ii 1 Governor Bill Clinton has sold out completely to the union , ..I;; ! .. bosses. And Organized Labor seems poised to buy a loc grip over - the U.S. Senate. 7 ..- : .. -. $-_ If Organized Labor takes control over both the White House ..-. =. and Congress, every single Right to Work law in the country is in ...I: ., jeopardy -- including your own.

I_:i

...i-.__ -. Bill Clinton has promised the AFL-CIO he'll work to repeal .. _. Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act. As you know, Section

.~..-. 14(b) authorizes state legislatures to enact state Right to Work ..-. . .. . laws...... -. 3; I have taken emergency action to alert 23* XXXXXXXXX ,citizens that Governor Clinton intends to nullify your Right to Work law. I am doing all I can to mobilize public pressure on Bill Clinton to back away from his support for compulsory unionism. In case you missed it, I've attached a copy of the advertisement we are running this week in the XXXXXXXXX G'#)' xxxxxxxXxxxx~hW.4 Similar versions are running in newspapers in Right to Work states across the country. I am doing everything I can to alert the public that Governor Clinton has vowed to force every U.S. worker to pay union dues to get or keep a job in America. But I need your help. Could you send a special contribution of $1,000, $100 or $25 to helD us cover the costs of runninu these ads not only- in XXXXXX; but Right to Work states? I am literally stretched beyond your Right to Work Committee's financial limits. Counting on your future support, I have already borrowed over $300,000 to alert the American people to Big Labor's impending power grab. But I need your additional support right away to cover the costs of these ads. Prudence will not allow me to go any further i+ebt. Please help me make the politicians who support compulsory unionism feel the ire of the 75% of the American people who believe that no one should ever be forced to join a union to feed his familv. We must turn Governor Clinton (and a bunch of Senate candidates) around on Right to Work, NOW, while they're still listening. Please, please, call Governor Clinton IMMEDIATELY at 1 (800) 325-9992 and tell him his support for compulsory unionism is morally wrong, and economically disastrous for XXXXXXXXXXX'. Sw $m-L.%t! a candidate for And call XXXXXX seat, and urge him to publicly oppose compulsory unionism and defend your Right to Work law. And if you can, please send a special contribution today to help us cover the additional cost of this last-minute advertising

i.. i..:.-. r. : s Work ,-.. 2'4 XXXXXXXXXXX Right to law may depend on it. Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. If Governor Clinton gets his way and kills your Right to Work law by repealing Section 14(b) of the Taft- Hartley Act, thousands o€ XX jobs will be lost. Please send a special contribution today to help pay for running the attached newspaper ads. ,:. .:::.-...... II.,.. i. ..i 5 -. 1; 1'. f ,I

(1: (1: ..

...'i ..:, BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ....- jii! :

_.....\ . In the Matter of 1 ?z~.... Witness Subpoena to ) MUR 3774 cs.i.. The National Right to)

..jll Work Committee ) -. fri I =>

DOCUMENTS FROM NRTWC

Supplemental Submission in Response to Letter from FEC dated 9/4/97

Item 1.d. (Attach to FINAL copy)

DATE: ,I/ ,:/4 7

PACKAGE: ,W ALhrL. /Lis; !4 /iLIcJ--I $&/Ohtc) l' 0 FROM: 4li A Ah'[/

HAVE ALL RECOMMENDED CHANGES BEEN MADE? WYES 0 NO

PROOF1 NG:

IST REVISION NEEDED MD

2N I) REVISION NEEDED

3RD REVISION NEEDED

4TH REVISION NEEDED

5TH REVISION NEEDED

6TH REVISION NEEDED

FINAL COPY APPROVED? dYES C]NO DATE: //-'/s@y* E

e 2 e!

d....

;-7A-

__.:~.. i..;-. .: .: ...... -...

E E! E Right to Work Action Reply

TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, VA 22160 From:

...... r2 Li: .. ... ~. .. .-.~ ..it i Dear Reed: Thank you for updating me on the results of the Right to Work Candidate Survey. To make sure the candidates know where 2 stand on Right to Work issues, I have: __ Contacted the candidates to urge them to support the Right to Work. - Enclosed a contribution of:

__ $25 ___ Other Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC Candidates for the U.S. Senate

Questions#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wyche Fowler, Jr. -D ------United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 (404) 331-0697

Paul Coverdell-R YYYYYYYYY 2804 Andrew Dr., NW Atlanta, GA 30305 (404) 320-1992

i.... L .. :->.. , L:

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will YOU support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or desrroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union polilical 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the administration of President John F. Kennedy. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t unions are the only private organization in the US. want its “services.” 6. Labor which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as lreasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights.” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints intended pave the for compelling i-. are to way workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political ;: fmancial support From so-called “free riders” for representation spending on gaods and services lo elect candidates for federal ;:.. they do not want. offices. 1; ~: The f~ngof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition to union PAC fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor contributions; they are seldom -- if ever - documented or .~.. Relations Act and the National Railway Labor ACL reported to the Federal Election Commission. .~.. Section 7 of the NLRA, for example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union “in-kind” expenditures ...~ . employees shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated that ., union activities “except to the extent that such right may be this so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more than ... .. affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded 5350 million. ..-.... The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years, legislation has been inaoduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upon workers of .. existing fekral compulsory unionism...... aulhorizations of nonunionized companies which have even the slightest 3. In 21 states. wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act -- are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perfon separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical olthese laws, saying, ‘The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board to determine worker support. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legislation would also encourage The authority of states to adop: adenforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to we reaffmed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subconh-actor as an excuse to picket and be National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractors at a job site. 4. Extortion, as a technique. is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress lo officuls in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union Officials the level. some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obsmct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prorecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter, maiming, arson, aggravated property destruction, 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers bargaining demands. during a suike. 5. Far the past several years, Congress has been confronted by The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to suike by giving preferential, post-strike hiring employees at various levels of government. privileges to strikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at state. county and Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent strike under these conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal dues be fired. e II ..0

f! GA

ates far the U.S. Senate

Questions#: I23 45 618 9 Wyche Fowler, Jr.-0 ------United States Senate Washington, OC 20510 (404) 331-0697 ...... , ..; Paul Coverdell-R YYYYYYYYY 2804 Andrews DK., NW .. . .. Atlanta, GA 30305 ...... (404) 320-1992

.. -..- f .: i ...-.. .. .:...

-~ .... =. ..-. __...-

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which Will y~uoppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as its primary goal, !o forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act. which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require bfe firing of employees who choose to work during a soike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course. endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. BACKGROWER The information below is helpful in explaining the questions on the reverse side of this fm.

1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the adminisnation of President John F. Kennedy. unit - includlig employ& who oppose the union and don’t 6. unions are the only private organization in the U.S. want its “services.” Labor which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right neasuries. The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union bargain themselves. Union officials fought for this power to for officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to and refuse to give it up; yet they a complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use ~. Such complaints intended to pave the way for compelling .:I: are workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political ’::’.. . fmcial support from so-called “free riders” for represenmion spending on goods and services to elect candidates for federal ~.--$ they do not want. .. offices. 2. The f~ngof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or These %-kind” expenditures are in addition to union PAC fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor contributions: they are seldom if ever documented or .. - - .. . Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act reported to the Federal Election Commission. .. Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union “in-kind”‘ expenditures ..~~ employees shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated that union activities “except to the extent that such right may be this so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more than affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. .~. The problem of compulsory unionism was created by recent years, legislation has in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the 7. in been introduced .:.. existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. to automatically impose union representation upon workers of : nonunionized companies which have even the slightest 31 in 21 states. wage earners - except those covered by the economic links tn unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - itre shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate .and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws, saying, ‘The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the shnw of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board Ur determine worker support. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legislation would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use reaffmed by Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractorsat a job site. 4. Extortion. as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress to officials in obtaining such demands as compdsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees, which makes union officials the level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so imporrant that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands. union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for dueatening to coerce civil servants in60 supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter, maiming, aggravated propeq destruction, arson, Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would explosives or firearms offenses, etc. to obtain collective 9. - prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers bargaining demands. during a strike. 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to smke by giving preferential, post-strike hiring employees at various levels of government. privileges to seikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent strike under these conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guarantwd by t5e Postal dues be fired. Candidates for the U.S. Senate

Questlom#: 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wyche Fowler, Jr. -D ------United States Senate Washngton, DC 20510 (404) 331-0697 ...... ~.. -~:i., . . Paul Coverdell-H YYYYYYYYY ...~... 2804 Andrew3 Dr., NW .::. .. .. Atlanta, GA 30305 ..,...... (404) 320-1992

... ~. . ..

._...... :: ...... -.: ......

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "services" 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive represenntive, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him LO accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called "antidouble breasting" Iegislation authorize compuLsmy unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or desaoy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or quhthe firing of employees who choose to work during a strike. and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal empIoyees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee. of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nmpartisan organization. But we believe that yoa 2s a Right to Work supporter ~IEentitled to lmow which candidates will support the right of every American to eam a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. G (Attach to FINAL copy)

...... ~...... ,.~. . -- .~...... ~. . HAVE ALL RECOMMENDED CHANGES BEEN MADE? YES NO ..... 0

...... _.- ~... .._- . ..:%: IST REVISION NEEDED \

2ND REVISION NEEDED _I -; i;:.. _...... JVkW vi:G 3RD REVISION NEEDED

4TH REVISION NEEDED

5TH REVISION NEEDED

611-1 REVISION NEEDED Candidates For the U.S. Senate

Questions# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wyche Fowler, Jr.4 ------United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 (404) 331-0697 I ..... I: ~. Paul Coverdell-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y .. I=:- 2804 Andrews Dr., NW ... .~...... Atlanta, GA 30305 ,, :...... ~. .~ (404) 320-1992 ::

.. : ...... ~ ..- .. ~- .... .

......

..._~~ -...... -~.

- = No Response

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for politicad causes and candidates qposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you suppon repeal of the provisions in federal laws which Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as ics primary goal. to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? Will you oppose legislation 3 weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee. of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living -without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. BACKGROWER The information below is helpful in explaining the questions on the reverse side of lhk form:

1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to Reorganization Act of 1973 and executive orders dating back to represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the administration of President John F. Kennedy. unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. unions t!e only private organization in the US. want its “services.” Labor are which can legally force individuals to pay dues in:o their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as treasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights.” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FFCA) prohibis union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a and refuse to give it up: yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. , . .. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. , -- At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use ...~. ., Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling , .~~... - workers’ compulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political .~ fiancial suppon from so-called “free riders’’ for representation :.-> ...:.-> ~. spending on goods and services to elect candidates for federal .~.. .. they do not want. ....~..~. . offices. i;j i;j The ruing of workers who refuse to pay union dues andlor These “in-kind” expenditures are in addiuon to union PAC fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor conmbutions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or .. reported to the Federal Commission. .. . Relations Act and the National Railway Labor ACL Election Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that No officiai statistics for total union %-kind” expenditures ... ~. . , .:. employees shall have “the right to refrain” fmm participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated that union activities “except to the extent that such right may be this so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more than ~. , .. . affected by an agreement requiting membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that ~.. organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft money” in I990 exceeded $350 million. .. ~ The problem compulsory unionism was created by of 7. In recent years, legislation introduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the has been ...~ . to automatically impose union represenation upon workers of .. existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. ..:- nonunionized companies which have even the slightest :T In 21 Sk3teS. wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act -- are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, Ihe compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws, saying, ‘The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board u) determine worker suppott. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legisladon would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use reaffied by Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractors at a job site. 4. Extortion. as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been introduced repeatedly in Congress u: officials in obtaining such demands as compulswy union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s resuictions against partisan “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criminal law is administered at the state and local power over federal employees. which makes union officirrls ihe level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduib for civil servants in collective bargaining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by feded statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for threatening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter, maiming, arson, aggravated property destruction. 9. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers bargaining demands. during a suike. 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to suike by giving preferential, post-strike hiring employees at various levels of government privileges to saikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and Since an employer is unlikely to find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent strike under these conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal dues be fred. GA

Candidates for the US. Senate

Questions#: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wyche Fowler, Jr.-D - - - = - - - )( United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 (404) 331-0697 ...... ~ Coverdell-R .... Paul YYYYYYYYY ...~...~...~. 2804 Andzews Dr., NW ...... ~ . Atlanta, 30305 ......

.. i- .: .. .. .

-. .. L

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse co accept hat Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative. which federal law now and fees for politid causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union politid 1. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion sfatute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would ptinfh or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power io shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Candidates for the U.S. Senate

Wyche Fowler, Jr.-D United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 (404) 331-0697 Paul Coverdell-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 2804 Andrews Dr., NW Atlanta, GA 30305

..... L..- .~. ...-: I... >: Right to Work Action Reply TO: Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, VA 22160 From:

Dear Reed: Thank you for updating me on the results of the Right to Work Candidate Survey. To mke sure the candidates know where I stand on Right to Work issues, I have: -Contacted the candidates to urge them to support the Right to Work. - Enclosed a contribution of:

I_ $200 - $100 - $50 - $25 - Other Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC .. ?. i :;: ... .- , ..:..ir: .. E .. 0 k 8 cr,

Yi; Right to Work Action Reply

TO : Reed Larson, President National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, VA 22160 From:

Dear Reed: Thank you for updating me on the results of the Right to Work Candidate Survey. To make sure the candidates know where I stand on Right to Work issues, I have: - Contacted the candidates to urge them to support the Right to Work. - Enclosed a contribution of: - $200 __ $100 __ $50 - $25 - Other Please make checks payable and return to: NRTWC

0 u a, 5 Q) u r: u u Q) 0 b Ln .E0 k .Lo V 1 0 .. .. w ,o 0 I C 0 0 0 -4 4 u clt s7 -?I k u C I 0 0 0 0 m (u a clt a, VI .. 0 a -i a, U I a, C p: w k .. '0 a, '2 !a I

0 u E a, .c u a, 0 m Ln k * 1 k QI 0 .. 5: u. w X 0 8 rnk I 00 C 0 u3 0 0 (0 .I4 rl uo u * .rl u 1 I u I) Ln cu .rl N ac k 0-r UO u .4 c I a,LZ 0 V 0 .sa 0 c a (u I mu * n, a uu a, Uk .. mo ; 'c1 ua -4 a, ca u I Q1 03 c 0: um w k m QI P I I November 16, 1992

Dear Georgis Member, Now that Bill Clinton has been elected President, your Senator may hold the fate of Right to work in his hand. Your Secator may be the one who decides the future of Section 14(bl of the Taft-Hartley Act. which allows Georgia to keep its cherished Right to Work Law. He may cast the deciding vote on Senator Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, giving Big Labor the power to terrorize any business with a crippling strike -- easy as pushing a button. Your Senator may also be the one to conscript nearly 3 million federal employees into the union bosses' political atmy -- with marching orders paid for with your tax dollars -- by repealing the 53-year-old Hatch Act. With Bill Clinton in the White House, the Senate will be the last redoubt of worker freedom. One vote in the Senate could determine the fate of' Right to Work. Or, one vote could enact union-bass power grabs into law. If the Pushbutton Strike bill and Hatch Act repeal become law, you know what will happen to Georgia and the entire country: skyrocketing taxes and inflation will follow in the wzk? of bankrupted small businesses and lengthening unemployment lines as union organizers seek to control countless workers. The crucial oueation is, where do Gearuia's Senate candidates stand on Riuht to Work? Incumbent Wvche Fowler refuses to say. In the past few months, I have written Mr. Fowler three times imploring him to tell his constituents where he stands on Right to Work. I've even tried certified mail. Still, Mr. Fowler continues to defy his constituents' right to know his views on the issues that will directly affect their lives. But after looking at Mr. Fowler's voting record in the U.S. Senate, it is clear what he's trying to hide. He voted on June 11th and June 16th of this year to quash a pro-Right to Work Eil.ihuscer and enact r.he Piishhlitton Strike bill, which would hand union "organizers" the power to punish or even fire workers who dare to go to their jobs in defiance of a union-boss strike order. By penalizing workers for resisting the union czars. the Kenne?,y Strike bill would have blown a huge hole in Georgia's Right to Work law. In June 1990, Senator Fowler voted in lockstep with the union czars to repeal the Hatch Act which protects federal employees from getting ensnared in partisan politics. This political payoff would have allowed union officials to browbeat 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers into supporting the union political machine. I don't know whether Wyche Fowler supports Organized Labor's plans to wipe out Georgia's and 20 other state Right to Work laws through repeal of Taft-Hartley Section 14(bJ. He won't say. But since he voted to gut your Right to Work law when he backed Ted Kennedy's job-destroying Strike bill, I must fear the worst. What's more, grateful union barons have delivered to Mr. Fowler over $380,000 since 1986 from union-brass PACs. And experts agree that Big Labor has dumped ten times that amount into Mr. Fowler's campaign in the form of illegal "soft" money for phone banks, get-out-the-vote drives and paid "volunteers.' All this paints the picture of a union boss puppet who shows ...... __ no signs of cutting the strings that bind him to the union .. . bosses.

...... -. And it makes clear that Mr. Fowler needs eo hear from vou...... Lr:.. .. Call (4041 331-0697, or pay a personal visit to Sen. Fowler. Demand Chat he repudiate his past support for forced unionism. Onlv a deafenino roar of urotest from Georoia's ora-Risht to Work maioritv at this time when Sen. Fowler is listenina so closelv to his constituents, will cause him to see the lioht and mend his wavs. There is some good news. Mr. Fowler's opponent, Paul Coverdell, has leveled with you and vowed 100% commitment to protect your Right to Work. But, Mr. Coverdell is under intense pressure from the union hierarchy to back down from his courageous stand. Please uhone vour thanks and encouraaement to Mr. Coverdell at (4041 320-1992. And I hope you will do one more thing. I had to spend money I didn't have to send you this special alert. Even though the Committee already has overdue bills from this year's battle against forced unionism, I had no choice. I had to enlist you and all Georgia Right to Work members in this last, crucial fight to save Georgia's Right to Work. So if you can, please return with the enclosed Right to Work Action Reulv, a suecial contribution of $200, 5100. 550 or $25 to help defray-the cbsts of this effort. But contact the candidates TODAY -- that's most imuortant! Sincerely,

Reed Larson P.S. Now that Big Labor has elected Bill Clinton President, your Senator's vote counts more than ever. If Georaia's citizens turn the heat up hiah enouah even Wvche fowler will see the liaht. Contact him today. Tell him to defend your Right to Work. Call (404) 331-0697. Also, please call Mr. Coverdell to thank him for supporting Right to Work. His number is (404) 320-1992. ..- *='.. ..~.. ...:/:i: on

NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE - 8001 Blaaililch Road * Sulre 500 * Springlieid. Vlrglnla 22160 * Teleonone'7031321-9820

November 16, 1992

Dear Georgia Member, Now that Bill Clinton has been elected President, your Senator may hold the fate of Right to Work in his hand. Your Senator may be the one who decides the future of Section 14Lb) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which allows Georgia to ...... ~. . keep its cherished Right to Work Law. .... He may cast the deciding vote on Senator Ted Kennedy's ..... ~., .. Pushbutton Strike bill, giving Big Labor the power to terrorize - ....., with a crippling strike -- s: any business easy as pushing a button. Your Senator may also be the one to conscript nearly 3 .~.. million federal employees into the union bosses' political army ...~~ . -- with marching orders paid for with your tax dollars -- by . ..~.~ repealing the 53-year-oldAatch Act. .. With Bill Clinton in the white House. @e Senate wilr be t he last redoubt of worker fra. One vote in the Senate could determine the fate of Right to Work. Or, one vote could enact union-boss power grabs into law. .~...... If the Pushbutton Strike bill and Hatch Act repeal become . .. law, you know what will happen to Georgia and the entire country: skyrocketing taxes and inflation will follow in the wake of bankrupted small businesses and lengthening unemployment lines as union organizers seek to control countless workers. Thole cruci ion n c-k? c-k? Incumbent Wvche Fowler refu88s to say. In the past few months, I have written Mr. Fowler times imploring him to tell his constituents where he stands on Right to Work. I've even cried certified mail. Still, Mr. Fowler continues to defy his constituents' right to know his views on the issues that will directly affect their lives. But after looking at Mr. Fowler's voting record in the U.S. Senate, it is clear what he's trying to hide. He voted on June 11th and June 16th of this year to quash a pro-Right to work filibuster and enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, which would hand union "organizers" the power to punish or even fire workers who dare to go to their jobs in defiance of a union-boss strike order. By penalizing workers for resisting the union czars, the Kennedy Strike bill would have blown a huge hole in Georgia's Right to Work law. In June 1990, Senator Fowler voted in lockstep with the union czars to repeal the Hatch Act which protects federal emplcyees from getting ensnared in partisan politics. This political payoff would have allowed union officials to browbeat 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxgayers into supporting the union political machine. I don't know whether Wyche Fowler supports Organized Labor's plans to wipe out Georgia's and 20 other state Right to Work laws through repeal of Taft-Hartley Section 14(b). He Won't say. But since he voted to gut your Right to Work law when he backed Ted Remedy's job-destroying ScriXe bill, I must fear the worst. What's more, grateful union barons have delivered to Mr. Fowler over $300,000 since 1986 from union-brass PACs. And experts agree that Big Labor has dumped ten times that amount into Mr, Fowler's campaign in the farm of illegal "soft" money for phone banks, get-out-the-votedrives and paid "volunteers."

... All this paints the picture of a union boss puppet who shows ~. no signs of cutting the strings that bind him to the union i... bosses. -.;> .- And it makes clear th h r QK~. ..ti; 1 Call (404) 331-0697, or pay a personal visit to Sen. Fowler. Demand that he repudiate his past support for forced unionism. Q~daafenin_sroaroPDrot.e;rt~a'S DrO-Riqht tQ .... .~ Work maioritv at th is t ime when Sen. Fowler is listening_ge = .... claselv to his constituents. will cause him to see the lmht and, <... .3 mw. There is some good news. Mr. Fawler's opponent, Paul I,i..~.~ ~.... . Coverdell, has leveled with you and vowed 100% commitment to .~...... protect your Right to Work. But, Mr. Coverdell is under intense pressure from the union hierarchy to back down from his courageous stand. ple ase aho ne yourq ks and encoura vr 1 t4 - 2. And I hope you will do one more thing. I had to spend money I didn't have to send you this special alert. Even though the Committee already has overdue bills from this year's battle against forced unionism, I had no choice. 1 had to enlist you and all Georgia Right to Work members in this last, crucial fight to save Georgia's Right to Work. So if you can, please return with the enclosed Right to Work Action Reply, a special contribution of $200, $100, $50 or $25 to help defray the costs of this effort. But contact the cand idates TODAY -- that's most imDorCank !

P.S Now that Big Labor has elected Bill Clinton President, your Senator's vote counts more than ever. 1:q 1:q i' .'= h at ih hv Wvche FOwler will see th_elishs. Contact him today. Tell him to defend your Riqht to Work. Call (404) 331-0697. Also, please till Mr.-Coverdell to thank him for supporting Right to Work. His number is (404) 320-1992. 0 u 5 su a, 0 In E v). 3 k 0 u. ;; .Y 0 rnk E mo a u3 a ii T30 .4u a cu ar UP -4 a,d sa,c VU W UU vu .. a0 v Ua a, ea a, 03 .. I% Vu, ..ti._ . b .. a k a, cr, R I

0 u a, G a, .c u U u a, cn 30 Ll 1 V 0 .. 0.. u. w Y 0 .Y 0 W mL! 00 C u3 0 a .d a0 u -4 u 5 a P eu .d 4.c k ucn 4J -4 C a,K 0 5al u .c 4 73u a, a uu a, uL! m .. a0 0 ua rl 2 Ea u a, OJ E: Ec vu2 W k ill 0 .. a, e tr, a I I I

~ I National Right to Work Committee - 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, Virginia 22160 (800)325-7892 9 FAX (703)321-7342

Telecspier lnfoarnalion Sheet

I The following pages are for: .. , .-s!. ^...... 3 ..__ is.. Individual: 7ICL SIQLmI rr j : ' Firm: E~~&x,EkP?i-L CS .I ...... - . Telephone: 3a S'71 CSSO - ...z.. . Telecopier: :: .: From: + -T;w\ L3At&% ...-. >Z Total number of pages (including information sheet): a

t'i.. . Date transmitted: I ill -lI.,., Ti! ..:. i

This fax message is in- Comments: tended oniy for the personal and confidential use of the addressee(s) or the designated recipient@) named above. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applica- ble law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have recsived this document in error and that any use, review, dis- semination, distribljiion, or copying 'h', IS message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us by US. mail at the address above. Thank you. . ._...

- 0KTOP"'T - OK TO PRINT WITH CORIZRECTIONS. PWEINDICATE ALL CORWECTIONS ON BLUELJNE PROOF iWD ALSO 8N THE BACK OF THIS FORPI. T"R YOU. - REVISED PROOFS REQUESTED ._ .- ~~...,~.

.. 4 ....~~ ..~. 9 :-.' PLEASE CALL FOR PICK-W WHEN READY. (301) 597-8650 '? .~ ..I...... ~.-. PLEASE RETURN BY TO MER THE DELIVERY SCHEDULE. .. ~ i.:. .. --

5coI-E Forbes Bwlevard canham. MM20705

- OKTOPRINT - OK TO PRINT WITH CQRRRECTIONS. PLEASE INDICATE ALL CORRECTIONS ON BLUELINE PROOF AND ALSO ON THE BACK OF THIS FORM. THANK YOU. - REVISED PROOFS REQUGSTED

APPROVED BY (3-c- 3& DATE 11 //2 la PLEASE CALL FOR PICK-UP WHEN READY. (301) 577-8650 PLEASE RE" BY TO MEET THE DELIVERY SCHEDULE.

I ! NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE * BCOI 8ino;tack Roan - Suile 500 s SoringllPlr1,Virglnia 22160 * TaleDhonei7031321.9820 /

November 16, 1992

Withina Bill Clin on in e t e wi 11 be th a last redoubt of worker freedom. .~... .~. ... One vote in the Senate could determine the fate of Right to ... .. Work. Or, one vote could enact union-boss power grabs into law. If the Pushbutton Strike bill and Hatch Act repeal hecome law, you know what will happen to Georgia and the entire country: skyrocketing taxes and inflation will follow in the wake of bankrupted small businesses and lengthening unemployment lines as union organizers seek to control countless workers. The crucial auestion is. where do Georoia's Senate candidates st and on Riaht to Work,? Ucumbent Wvchp Fowler refuses to say. In the past few months, I have written Mr. Fowler times imploring him to tell his constituents where he stands on Right to Work. I've even tried certified mail. Still, Mr. Fowler continues tc defy his constituents' right to know his views on the issues that will directly affect their lives. But after looking at Mr. Fowler's voting record in the U.S. Senate, it is clear what he's trying to hide. He voted on June 11th and June 16th of this year to quash a pro-Right to Work filibuster and enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, which would hand union "organizers" the power to punish or even fire workers who dare to go to their jobs in defiance of a union-boss strike order. By penalizing workers for resisting the union czars, the Kennedy Strike bill would have blown a huge hole in Georgia's Right to Work law. In ziae 1990, Senator Fowler voted in lockstep with the union czars to repeal the Hatch Act which protects federal employees from getting ensnared in partisan poiitics. This political payoff would have allowed union officials to browbeat 2.9 million federal employees and thousands o€ U.S. taxpayers into supporting the union political machine. Candidates f~rthe U.S. Senate

Questlaos W: 123 4 5 6 7 89 Wyche Fouler, Jr.-D ------United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 (404) 331-0697

Paul Coverdell-R YYYYYYYYY 2804 Andreus Dr., NW Atlanta, GA 30305 (404) 320-1992

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “Services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept !bat Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as ils primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section I4(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes state Right to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken ~i destroy the Hatch Act. which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecutian under the federal anti-extortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation hat would punish or require. the fing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses chat county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues?

Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of corn, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpariisan organization. But we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are entitled to know which candidam will support. tk right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. GA

Candidates for the U.S. Senate

Questions#: 123456789 Wyche Fowler, Jr. -D ------United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 ,. ... (404) 331-0697 .....~. Paul Coverdell-R YYYYYYYYY 2804 Andrews Dr., NW Atlanta, GA 30305 (404) 320-1992

Survey Questions

1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” Will you support amendments to the Federai Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representxive. which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates oppoEd by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley Act. which authorizes state Right !n Work laws? Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the fung of employees who choose to work during a seike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, state, give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse KI force their employees Lo pay union dues?

Note: The National Right w Work Committee, of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. But we believe that you 2s a Right to Work supporter are entilled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. BACKGROUNDER The information below is helpful in explaining the questions on the reverse side of this form.

1. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to Rmrganization Act of 1970 and executive orders dating back to represent and bind all employees in a company’s bargaining the administration of President John F. Kennedy. unit including employees who oppose the union and don’t - unions are the only private organization in the want its “services.” 6. Labor US. which can legally force individuals to pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right aeasuries. The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power union and refuse give it up; yet they complain they “unfairly officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to a to are candidate for federal office. .~.burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. At the same time, FECA permits union officials to use .-.. Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling .: fmancial supprt from so-called “free riders” for representation workers’ compulsory dues dollars for %-kind” political spending os to they do not want. goods and services elect candidates for federal ... .. offices. 1.7. i The fuing of workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition to union PAC .. fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor contributions; they are seldom - if ever - documented or - Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act reponed to the Federal Election Commission. il Section 7 of the NLRA. for example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union “in-kind” expenditures ;-. employees shall have “the right 10 refrain” fmm participating in are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated that union activities “except to the extent that such right may be this so-called “soft money” amounted to 10 times more than affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in cash contributions. Based on that :I-.-~ organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft money” in 1990 exceeded $350 million. .~.’ The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years, Legislation has been introduced in Congress .~. ...’ Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upon workers :! i;.- exisling federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. .. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest 3. ’ In 21 states. wage earners - except those covered by the economic links to unionized companies. National Railway Labor Act - are shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws, saying, ‘The contract would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers. without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board to determine woricer support. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legislation would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use reaffirmed by Section 140) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispute with a single subconmctor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act. shut down all the other subcontractors at a job site. 4. Extortion, as a technique, is extremely useful to union 8. Legislation has been inh-oduced repeatedly in Congress to offichls in obtaining such demands as compulsory union shops, loosen the 50-year-old Hatch Act’s restrictions against partisan “agency” shops, compulsory hiring halls and irrevocable dues political activity by federal employees. check-off clauses. Federal union officials now wield monopoly bargaining While most criniiiial law is administered at the state and local power over fcderdl employees, which makes union ofkials thc level, some criminal activities (including extortion), which sole conduit for civil servants in collective bargeining and obstruct interstate commerce, have been deemed by Congress to grievance situations. be so important that they should be covered by federal statutes. Current proposals to weaken the Hatch Act lack explicit As the federal law currently stands, union officials have prohibitions against the use of monopoly bargaining power to unique special immunities from prosecution for htening to coerce civil servants into supporting federal union officials’ commit or committing felonies - such as murder, political agenda. manslaughter, maiming. arson, aggravated property desmction, explosives or firearms offenses, etc. - to obtain collective 9. Legislation has been inuoduced in Congress that would bargaining demands. prevent employers from hiring permanent replacement workers during a strike. 5. For the past several years, Congress has been confronted by The bill’s provisions would also penalize workers who bills designed to authorize the forced unionization of public choose not to strike by giving preferential, post-strike hiring employees at various levels of government. privileges to strikers. Several of these proposals are aimed at state, county and Since an emp!oyer is unlikely lo find employees who will municipal employees and would nullify existing state laws work during a violent sCAe under these conditions, employers which shield public employees from union coercion. would be forced to cave in to every demand by union officials Other bills would strip postal workers and other federal - including the demand that workers who refuse to pay union employees of the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Postal dues be fired. ' National Right to Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, Virginia 22160 (800) 325-7892 FAX (703) 323-7342

~ The following pages are for:

, : i-l ..$2 .i .._. . ti:i :.> .._.. ..~ ,'.k2-j i Individual: Zrcl( SAUm jI j ' Firm: €dTMP,ISE &e.@&& i I

.2 ~~ Telephone: Telecopier: 301 57-f QBiC __...... -. ..-< From: --Gm LJ.Ydxk< - P 2 Total number of pages (including information sheet): a .. .. IJ-. Date transmitted: \iJu , -. . GA ,..riiI cc

This fax message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the addressee@) or the designated recipient(s) named above. it may contain information that is privileged, confidential ar exempt from disclosure under applica- ble law. If you are not the intended recipient, YOU are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any use, review, dis- semination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prchibied. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us by US. mail at the address above. Thank you. OK TO PRINT OK "0 PRWT Wms CORRRECTIONS. PLEASE INDICATE ALL CORRECTIONS ON BLUELINE PRWF AND ALSO ON THE WKOF THIS MaFW T1"W YOU.

I_ REVISED PROOFS REQUESTED

WPPROVEDBY I rLL2eL- DATE bf//!/.-. '' - - PLEASE CALL FOR PICK-UP WHEN READY. (3011) 577-8650

- - PLEASE RETURN BY TO MEET THE DELIVERY SCHEDULE.

COLOR BREAK YES- NQ - - FOLD bhOW- YES - NO - 5-5e Off&- d OKTOPRINT - OK TO PRINT WITH CORRRECMONS. PLEASE INDICATE ALL CORRECTIONS ON BLUELINE PROW AND ALSO ON THE BACK OF THIS FORM. TWKYOU. - REVISED PROOFS REQUESTED

(I! w+ FOR PIC#-UP 'WMENREADY. (301) 57746% p? BY TO MEET THE DELIVERY SCHEDW. I don'c know whether Wyche Fowler supports Organized Labor's plans to wipe out Georgia's and 20 other state Right to Work laws through repeal of Taft-Hartley Section 14(b). He won't say. But since he voted to gut your Right to Work law when he backed Ted Kennedy's job-destroying Strike bill, I must €ear the worst. What's more, grateful union barons have delivered to Mr. Fowler over $380,000 since 1996 from union-brass PACs. And experts agree that Big Labor has dumped ten times that amount into Mr. Fowler's campaign in the form of illegal 'soft" money for phone banks, get-out-the-votedrives and paid "volunteers." All this paints the picture of a union boss puppet who shows no signs of cutting the strings that bind him to the union bosses. Fnd it mkes clear that Mr. Powler a- to hear from vw. Call (404) 331-0697, or pay a personal visit to Sa. Fowler. Demand that he repudiate his past support for forced unionism.

Gpd his was. There is some good news. Mr. Fowler's opponent, Paul Coverdell, has leveled with you and vowed 100% commitment to protect your Right to Work. But, P.V. Coverdell is under intense pressure from the union hierarchy to back down from his courageous stand. mase who ne your thanks and enco-nt to -1 at (404) 320-1992. And I hope you will do one more thing. I had to spend money I didn't have to send you this special alert. Even though the Committee already has overdue bills from this year's battle against forced unionism, I had no choice. I had to enlist you and all Georgia Right to Work members in this last, crucial fight to save Georgia's Right to Work. So if you can, please return with the enclosed Right to Work Action Reply, a special contribution of $200, $100, $50 or C2S to help defray the costs of this effort. But contact the candidates TODAY _- t's most imuortant!

P.S. Now that Big Labor has elected Bill Clinton President, your Senator's vote counts more than ever. .If Georq ia,s citilens turn the heap- u hiqh enouqh eveq W the Fawler will see the li- . Contact him today. Tell & to defend your Right to Work. Call (4041 331-0697. Also, please call Mr. Coverdell to thank him for supporting Right to Work. .His number is (404) 320-1992. IIII

6 5 6

.. --. ... -... .;: -...

i .. P

...:

.. ~ ...... -. f-, .::~. - ...... ~.. 3 z . P ..L . .~...... ,

SISR MAILING SBRVIa

Par%: CLYDE SISR '......

c. i -.. p .. f-7 ...!*i- >

~.~._. .:= .. :~:-.

.....___-...... ,to ..... wiled 3rd Class. Slsk ne

.. .:.: . , ...... z ...... :: ...... , .. ;..;. . ,.~. Insert '1x1-this 'order face 'back: "' : ...... ,...... "._ . BRE -.6 314 mite, (AT,SISRI .... nfrtx 1atiF1 . .. .S,C ...... to show thi,u.'window.' ' . .. .. REPLY - S .I/Z x 1.1 2up:On Green;."slit to ...... a. x 5.112. ,and' fold..in . headout';'for. .' ..... 1/2. .~ ...thlras .. .: ...... insertion. . ' ciosm - 8 112 .X 11 an ~woky~,foEded headout.', LETTER-. 8 3/2 x 14 ,mITF., folded .headont, . ... _%. CARRIER .- Use P10, SURVEY. 792 w/teaser whdow '- ,. .' .~;. ( BWRWCOl ) until exhausted,' ther. use '910 %JRVEY '92 w/o Teaser (PNRWC22) until exhausted,'then ...... use #IO SUR^^ BAR ( ~NRWCDAR).$o,,.cokplete .:. ,...... :.. ,-. . .. '. .' ...... this-mailing . .. ,, ... ., .~...... Cost: Process?ng '...... 707.9 .. Postage ' Q209.18.= -2,714. . ' , $3; .. .. K20848 = 8,053 . '-,:... :' U20548 = .16,780" ,.. II .. . -, . ' V20338 =' .. ,. ...30,093 .. ... -. .. ..l, .. Total = 3'9,640 problem. .. Please call with any questions .or ... Thank you. .. ..

--c PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE

PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE- :~. ~U*ORIZEV'SISIONATURE ;' ' .. - .... WITH EACH INVOICE. .. .. ,. , ... ,. .. : . DESK . ., ; SAPEAKE glAV BUSINESS BAT PAGE - 1

MD 643-SISK (301) TERMS: ALL CHARGES ARE PAYABLE 10 FAX DC-459-0973 DAYS NET. A SERVICE CHARGE OF 1 S% PER MOMH (ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE 15W WILL BE ADDED TO PAST DUE ITEMS.

.)t I-. - -. -. -. -

Mc r.!eni5e K0f.f Naticrn31 Right 'To Ldorl.: Cotnm i .t .tee

$3,107.9

! I . '__ &'\ PRINTERS PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE - AUTHOAIZEDSIGNATURE WITH EACH INVOICE.

BOOKKEEPING P.O. NO. ~A~~Q~~LRl4 WORK CBMMBTTEE c 12228 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD THIS ORDER NO. MUST SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22160 APPaR ON ALL- INVOICES PURGrnABE uDR3.ER ;1&)

( STATE ACTIVITIES PUBLIC RELATIONS MEMBERSHIP GENERAL PROGRAMS SPECIALhW?dS

I 1 TO Neodata SHIP TO I * Attn: May Haddad Sisk Mailing I e

420918 U,J.@pO RATE DATE REQUIRED RE U20548 >"11/10/92.. 11/13/9 2 GA Fed. Sum. Run off V20338

May, using the GA Active, Inactive, Supporter and Poli-donor files that you have previously pulled off, please provide 4-up Cheshire label Do a 3/5 digit 3rd class presort. Include name and address, mail key, keyline. Sort all four files together. Mail Key --Select 420918 GA Active D/A. omit flags'A,M,N,O,J,2. K20848 GA Inactive D/A. Omit flags A,M,N,O,J,2. ~20548 GA supporters. V20338 GA Poli-donors. Omit E &P flags ti Inactive & Supporter matches.

PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE / /w-/ - PRINTERS PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE WITH EACH INVOICE. Database Marketing Services ...... !... : :-::.. L...... :... - ...... !Vi 1, , TO: E MARKETING SERVICES, I FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA 22403-5445 Ih RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23260-5504 1

I FEN 54-0888925 INVOICE NO. WORK ORDER NUMBER 1 ACCOUNTNO. \ CUSTOMER P.O. \ DATE 112845 ' 74781A 100101 I12220 1 NOVEMBER 3% 199

I SOLD TO: SHIPPED TO: I -7

.. :-...... c FUNCTION PERFORMED - DESCRIPTION

- FEDERAL SURVEY RUN OFF APPLY MAILKEY TO THE FOLLOHING -C;A ACTIVES - PROCESS INPUT RECORDS PRUCESS OUTPUT RECOROS GA INACTIVES PROCESS INPUT RECORDS PROCESS auTPuT RECORDS GA PULI PROCESS INPUT RECORDS PROCESS QUTPUT RECORDS GA SUPPORTERS PROCESS INPUT RECORDS PROCESS OUTPUT RECORDS

315 DIGIT 3RD CLASS PRESORT

PRINT 4-UP CHESHIRE LABELS FIVE-DIGIT QUALIFIED UNQUALIFIED 7 ('fD. *P 2Jk19 9(,7r7 do S-L

PAGE 1 OF 1 TERMS NET 30 .. c P.0. .MQ. c.-2 2 7 7 0. ,~ . . y'? TO WORK COM \? . I . , ..-_ DDOCK ROAD THIS 'ORDER NO, MUS? --r ,- , ...... ~~. SPRINGFIEL0;VIRGINIA 22150 . .: . . . ..-;APPEAR ONCALL INVOICES .. ..

I I PClllWGMWGE @RDErn 1 .- ( STATE ACTIVITIES PUBLIC RELATlOlS MEMBERSHIP GENERAL PROGRAMS . SPECIAL PROJECTS ./ . a 0 a a

'0: TO SHIP TO

0 * ENTERPRISE GRAPHICS SISK MAILING SERVICE 0 -7CHESAPEMS BAY BWSINESS PAR# e STEWNSVILEE, MP. 21666 * ATTN: JOHN SULLIVAN .. AT* : CLYDE. S.1SK

~. . ...-. ,

-. ..,.. . .

-7

. ,. I...... :.. :.. ; .. . . John, please print the following: . .I ...... 39n Letter - 8 1/2 .x 14 on 50# WHITE offset. .. . Prints. 1/1 Black over .Black. Fold. head, out to #lo. No screens. No bleeds.. Must ..~, 'see ...c a blueline: ...... ,. ' Please return artwor'k with .blueline and oi s. day.of .delivery, along.witR ~5 samples;' ..: , ...... s2j~,3j/$ ...... ". Cost: .Piinting.. . and :Snipping'.. . .. '.':. .. . .:...... Pleas'e call with. any. questions 'or 'problem .. . ..

..Thank you. .- ..

.. . -.I. .. ' . .... ,. .. ., ..,. .,. . .., ._ . .. .?. .. .~...... , ...... ,. ~ ,:,. .

.. ;.. ,.. _I.. ., .._...... ,. . .: . . .. .;...... ~ ',.

.~ .... .

.. ., I......

PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE

-PRINTERS PLEASE --SENDONE SAMPLE <. ' WITH EACH INVOICE.

DESK ~. .. TO SHIP TO

0 EEITERPRISE GRAPHICS SISK MAILING SERVICE

e .. . ' 7 CHESAPEAKE BAY BUSINESS PARK

.... D ' ' .~.... STEVENSVILLE, 'MD: 21666 .... .- ...... D :ATTN: JOHN SULLIVAN;. , ... ' - ' ATTN:.. 'CLYDE .SXSK ..~......

-i 1l;l:

. '-., ...... John, please pzint the following: .. .. 39 Roster - 8 1/2,x 11 & 5Bb Ivory'offset. .. Prints. 1/1 Black over Black. Fold,head : out.to t10. No sc,reens. No bleeds., Must. see.a blueline...... ' ' Please return artwork .with blueline .ana ., . . day of delivery,' along with 5 samples>.. ,. .. . :. - ...... :...... ~......

I -C&t:. nd"ShiPpinq . . ;. $21.80, ...... :Printi,~g ... .' ...... I Please call'with any questions or proble '$50, ai .. i...... - .. ,. ~_I\. Thank you...... ~ ...... * . ~..

.- ...... - ...... ,...... _...... ,. , ...... ~,...... :

... PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE

PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE WITH EACH INVOICE.

DESK NATION?& RIGHT 'TO hx3RK (EM-IITTEE DATE Nov. 17, 1992 8001 Braddock Road INVOICE NO. Sprmgfield, VA 22160 loso I Attn: Gena R. Gunn JOB NO. Loo7 I 0RD%70?2277 kSJ SALES REEPRESCNTA'ITIIE o2

IS .. I..7 ~ ..... 5 _: I.:.. . PLEASE NOTE OUR PAYMENT TERMS:

~ bnncm. Mclylana 20706 Ner due and payable wirhin 30 days of invoice date. I.-- (301) 577-8650 i:?. A Service Charge ofl.S% per rnonrh (18% per annum) will be .. Fax (301) 577a850 ....~ asessed on each invoice not paid within 30 days of invoice &r2.

-.-...~. C10,SOO Georgia Results Letter @ $24.35/bf $986.18 i40,SOO Georgia Results Roster @ $21.80/&l 882.90 #'1i ....*: .. $1,869.08

2% to be distributed in MD ($37.38) MD Sales tax 5% 1.87

98% to be distributed out of State ($1831.70) Non-taxable

Total $1,870.95

I I I 1

I 1 1 I I 1 National Right to Work Committee - 8001 Braddock Road * Spnngfield, Virginia 22160 (800) 325-7892* FAX (703)321-7342

Teleeopies Information Skeet

The following pages are for: :::>.:

...? .....? . __. .~. ;'.:~. ...:.IX [ndividual: CL\I E S)S\C S76K MMdh sI ~. Firm: ._.. .. j~..i; -: . Telephone: Telecopier: % 410 (06'-(463 i.; ._...:I From: <,* dM<& ...... Total number of pages (including information sheet): a ~.~ .. ti.it':l., > Date transmitted: \\\,\

~ ~

This fax message is in- Comments: tended only for the personal and confidential use of the addressee(s) or the designated recipient(s) named above. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applica- ble law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any use, review, dis- semination, disrribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notiy us immediately by telephone and return the original rnes- sage to us by US. mail at the address above. Thank you. I I NATIONAL Rib TO WORK COMMITTEE P.O. NO. c 22777 8001 BAADDOCK ROAD THIS ORDER NO. wsr SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22160 APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES

( STATE ACTIVITIES 0PUBLIC RELATIONS D MEMBERSHIP GENERAL PROGRAMS SPECIAL PROJECTS

TO SHIP TO . SISK HAILING SERVICE DROP 11/16/92 .0 ATTN: CLYDE SISK 0

DATE DATE REOUIRED RE 11/14/92 11/16/92 GEORGIA RESULTS SURV2Y HAILSBOP

Clyde, please process the following:

Total mailing of apprsx 37,640 all to be mailed 3rd Class. Sisk to receive labels for 3/5 digit presort and residual. Staqi BREss with mail key on back. 6A to appear in upper right of letter. Over insert 25 samples and send to #am attn: Tila Walker. Insert in this order face back: ERE - 6 3/4 White, (AT 31%) - Affix label to show thru window. REPLY - 8 1/2 x 11 2UP on Green, Slit to 8 1/2 x 5 l/2 and fold in thirds headout for insertion. ROSTER - 8 1/2 x 11 on Ivory, folded headout. LETTER - 8 1/2 x 14 WHITE, folded Readcaut. CARRIER - Use #10 SURVEY '92 w/teaser window (INRWc01) until exhausted, than use #10 SURVEY '92 w/o Teaser (OlHRW22) until exhausted, then use )10 SURVEY '92 BAR ((MWWCBBR) to complete this mailing. Cost: Processing Postage g20918 = 2,414 K20848 = 8,053 W20548 = 16,780 V20338 = 10,093

Total = 37,640 Please call with any questions or prcablems. Thank you.

PLEASE INVOICE IN OUPLICATE

PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE WITH EACH INVOICE.

.. :. :. -: ...... ~... ..~... .. -.~......

._.....

a 7% OST ANALYSIS SHEET

PACKAGE :

._-. ~~ =:- =:- Zli .i..

SUB TOTAL COST PER PKG. PLUS OVERAGE TOTAL COST PACKAGE IREPORT Route to: SG - I_ From: (Copies to SMS, originator) Date routed: 1 I / 10

Postage : @ 3rd @ Meter Indicia atter: 11m @ pages Backed up? 0?&I '4 W \ Personalization? YES @xf ves. descru type. Daae #, matches

Select miteria (Completed by DAK):

Elhiinate Flags: ~illingcde: I7 Dewartment Codes: 2 -- public Relations 14 -- Skate Leg Activity 4 -- Renewals 17 -- Federal Survey 6 -- Prospect 18 -- State Survey 7 -- CEBFU 19 -- SERCC 9 -- Fundlraising Add'l 20 -- Telecommunications 11 -- Federal lobbying 21 -- Newsletter 13 -- Federal Leg Advocacy

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

--c2 In the Ma.tter of ) , .. . , 7-7 & Witness Subpoena to ) MUR 3174 The National Right to) ..~ ....- . ) .._ii . Work Committee .Iii ..~.

DOCUMENTS FROM NRTWC

Supplemental Submission in Response to Letter from FEC dated 9/4/97

Item 1.e. 1 1 I ..-...... ;..,' NATIONAL R T TO WORK COMM.lTTEE P.O. NO. c.22784 j ;&I I ..: 4: ,?< , ...... RADDOCK ROAD THIS ORDER MUST i_ ,:' , , NO. 1 ..x<,:t. 2. SPRINGFIELD:.V~RGIN~A22i60 ...... ' . :APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES I ...... I . .>

i TO SHIP TO j :: , .. e SERVICE ' i .L .~ SI%K MAILING DROP 11/18/92 I .. . :., i . A"M: CLYDE ,. SISK ... .. I .. ... 0 ,. .. ,. , ,, ...... ~.,.. ~ ...... ', .~.. ... ,;...... I/ 8 ., ..... &g .I ......

......

...... _ >tal ~&liPagof appnox 27W ell.to be- . ni.led 1st class. ~iweStamp. GA to appe&. in ?per right of letten.. men insent 25 aamp~ei

id send to Ma%% attn: Tim Walker. . ~ . ... ,. ... inert in this order face back: .. .. ~. 9 BJhfte, (AT SISKI.-.'.Affix'labek to show...... >xu window,- .. ,. ... %PLY - 8 L/2 x '11 2uP dn .IWorys To eo j ...... i+,kgr a .thirds'lieadouti:.far:Insertfo~:. . -~ ': .....- .. 3,...... ISTER ..- 8 I/z...x: 11..on..~lue';..foldled .. -'. .. . .~ ...... ~ER.-. 8 x golhrid ...... ' _I' 1/.2 11.WHIW,,, .haado .. -.. .. LRRIgR', -' #io 'slJE!vElt 992 Bi&" ~'~~R~~.~. , .. .. .~ ...... 37 . . ' mt: Proceeieing ...... -...... Postage-' . : ...... ! ...... ,. .,. ., ...... I...... ~ I 377.3s" tease call with any questions or problems...... hank you. .. :...... -. ...;:. .i. . -' . ..,...... - ...... ,...... , .. . PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE .,.I' '/ ) , PRINTERS: PCEASE.-.SEND.ONE SAMPLE i,... WITH EACH INVOICE...... &. .. r DESK ... SAPEAKE BAY BUSINESS PARk SVILLE, MARYLAND 21666-07 PAGE - 1 DC 459-SISK WID (301) 643-SISK TERMS.ALL CHARGES ARE PAYABLE io FAX DC-459-0973 QAYS NET A SERVICE CHARGE OF 1 5% PER MONTH (ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE 18%)WILL eE ADDEDTO PAST DUE ITEMS

SOLD ro: !

I JOB CUSTOIYER ' CUSTOMER P.O. NUMBER AND JOB TRLE PATE,O,' 1 INVOICE TERMS NUMBER YUMBER NUMBER I tO IIAYS 1 I I I I I .1-24-92 I S 377400 PRICE PW UNIT COW TOTAL FWE ! I I 35.00 ? 1000 964.14 I -... . ;

i I I ! C. R( ! I AF M

SERVICE PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT $964.14

i PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE I /; ,*- PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE WITH EACH INVOICE.

BOOKKEEPING - NATIONAL RllGHT TO WORK CQM P.Q. NQ. c 12229 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD THIS ORDER NO. MGST SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22160 APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES

1 > STATE ACTIVITIES PUBLIC AELATIONS MEMBEASHIP GENERAL PROGRAMS SPECIAL PROJECTS I ( l TO SHIP TO I Neodata e Attn: May Haddad e c-: May, this is going to SISK now. I::...; e ...yr . I will need to have a courier at .~.>:... 8AM .-.. . . Neodata at tomorrow to pick ...ii them up. .. Q20928 -- -- DATE DATE REOUIRED RE: U20558 11/17/92 11/18/92 GA 2nd Run off Fed. Surv. Special I I ...... _. ~ . -,:,...... , ...... ,,,. -1 .._... -:.::: .. ,:,;,;~.>.: ::.+.;:::;<., ...... ~.....:: ...... ,__ .C,. ... .,%;.,’ ti- ~,. . May, per our phone conversation, please providl a set of 4-up Cheshire labels for each mail ke: below. Use the same GA file we just used on p.0. 12228. Include’name and address, mail ka: and keyline. Mail Key Select 420928 GA Active D/A. Omit flags A,M,N,O,Y K20858 GA Inactive D/A. Omit flaas A.M.N.0. .~ . U20558 GA Supporters. -

PLEASE INVOKE IN DUPLICATE

PAINTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE

I WITH EACH INVOICE. TO

L P c I INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY TO: ERICKSBURC, VIRGINIA 22403-5445 p.O. Box25fi04 E MARKETING SERVICES. lh RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23260-5504

747818 001 01 MOVEMEER 30s 199

NRTWC 8801 BRADDOCK ROAD @RINGFIELD Vb 22160 &TTN:- GINA GUNN .. IC

FUNCTION PERFORMED - DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE ..... 'i G'A 2ND RUN OFF FEDERAL SURVEY SPECIAL PRINT 4-UP CHESHIRE LABELS I E GA ACTIVES -2 CA INACIVES YOU HAD 16780 GA SUPPORTERS 7; FE SHIPPING E HANDLING CHARGES TO SYSK NAILIMGS - - 33- lsPY 7

d 734- 7tii"A

PAGE OF X 1 TERMS NET 30 JL/'ip- 1c/& /&-/'-.

ORIGINAL. CUSTOMER BLACK ~ REMI~ANCECOPY RED - MASTER FILE BLUE ws CUSTOMERFILE GREEN- ACCOUNT C~ORDINATC. ~ .,;I,if!.- . - -. , TQ WORK .COMMITTEE ...... i .. ADOOCK ROAD THIS ORDER NO. MUST LD, VIRGINIA. 22160 ...... APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES.

' ( STATE ACTIVITIES 0 PUBLIC RELATIONS MEMBERSHIP GENERAL PROGRAMS SPECIAL PROJECTS

TO .. ,SHIP TO

0 ENTERPRISE GRAPHICS .... .SISK WAILING.-SERVICE . a 7 CHESaPEAKE BAY BU'SINESS PARK . .STEVZNSVILLE, )$De 21666 1TTN: JOHN 'SULLIVAN ', ATTN: CbYDE' SISK ...... , ...... ,, ......

...... *._.. .>..... ::

...... ,...... John, please print the following: ... x Letter - 8 1/2 11 on.5,0#-WHITE offset. .. ?rink.. 1/1 Black over.Black. Fold head -... - JU~.to #lo. No screens,..No.bleeBs..:Blueline ' '. ." is waved, Enterprise Graphics to ensiare.. superior print quality on thd.s':job.- ......

?lease.return &t&k 3ay of dellvery, ..aloiig...... ,. :oat,: .' Printing-and 'Shi .. 4 79.524 ?lease ea11 'with any queations dr.droblems.' ... .. __ ; ...... i.., .: . . .., :.: .... ., . :. . ., rhank you...... I-...... MUST ~DELZWPISD~TO :szsk'eo- Las~hsw.... rms JOB BE ...... ;?:' .... p4MJ 9:30wpP OW ..: ...... ' 13/18/92. ,...... - ...... ,.:.. .

...... - ...... ,I - PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE ..

PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE- - . ' . .. -? L- L- WITH EACH INVOICE. &?-?~. . .. .).,") .,.fl: -, ..+.: F ,!;.&.: . DESK '&3 > . e. . P.O. No. c 22782 .>4... -8 MATlOMAL 'T TO.WQRK COMMITTEE :- e- RADDOCK ROAQ THIS ORDER NO. MUST ., ... -..APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES .. SP ELD, VIRGINIA 22160 . ' '. ' ',... P@m@maBE@>@Em ( 0STATE ACTIVITIES PUBLIC- RELATIONS . MEMBERSHIP GENERAL PROGRAMS 0 SPECIAL PSQECTS ,. . Tf4~~~~~~~~~. .. GRAPHICS. s I IPP&I L I NG SERVICE S s I CHESWEPUPE BAY BUS I MES PARK ' . STEVGMSVILLE;94D.: 21666' OATTN: JOHN SULLIVAN ATTN: :CLYDE SfSk ...... -...... :" ...~ a ...... , ...... -.~. . , ......

, . .: I). . -.... ,...... _._:. .., .- ...~ ..I . '' .~ ...... , I...... ,. John, please.print the following:

2BM Roster - 8 .1/2 x I1 on 5U# B1u.c offset.,. , Prints. l/i Black over Black: @old.,head .. out to fflb. No.screens. No bleeds...... Bloeline is 'waved. Enterprise 'Cxaphi~cs ... 'to ensure superior..print. quality' on this .. .. job. ...,. .. . , ...... artwork. with Please return: b1ue.l ...... day.of delivery, ;along.-'w 7:j...... ', , ...... ,: ...... : .. ;a,& ...... , .. .. 329.331.. Cost &&inti& ...... -. ... Please call with .any questi.onL'.or.,propie& .: ...... i -. . i; ...... -. Thank you. , '.: . . ' . . , ..,- ...... , ,...... , . , ...... This .is a keprint'of our:purchas.e ozdelc: . . C22771 with 'a quantity .chaiige. and a:gapezi ... ';, ...... stock change ., ...... ~. . .: ...... ~ ., ...... 5 ...... t...... , ...... , ...... , ......

....

PLEASE INVOICE IN D.UPLICATE ... PRINTERS. PLEASE SEND. ONE-.SAMPLE ... WITH EACH INVOICE.

-_ DESK ~- c

Springfield, VA 22160 JOB NO. 1027 I Attn: Gena R. Gunn WRCW 22779-22782

.."...... _ii .5 ...-..-... +.? 5001-8 FolOes Eouievofd OUR PAYMENT TERMS: .. . PLEASE NOTE t :;Lomorn. Mawlano 20706 Net due and payable w'thin 30 days of invoice date. i (301) 577-8N A Service Charge of 1.5% per month (18% per annum) will be .~.:. Fox (301) 577-0853 nrcrccrd nn mrh invoice not oaid within 30 days of invoice &re.

29,120 Georgia Results Letter @ $28.33/M $824.97 ...... s,l20 Wrgia Results Roster @S29.33/pl 854.09 $1,679.06

2% to be distributed to M ($33.583 MD Sales Tiijt 5% 1.68 Bal. tobe distributed out of state (iiC45.48) Non-taxable Ttoal $1,680.74

Cb/o F ROUTE TO:

PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE

PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE WITH EACH INVOICE.

BOOKKEEPING

~ ~~ ~~ T TO WQRK GOBVPMiBTEE P.O. No. G -22 7 RADDOCM ROAD THIS ORDER NO. MUST ...... _..' , ... SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22160 ...... I . . .. ' . APPEAR ON ALL- INVOICES .. ..,. . , ..

<.- ... .. TO SHIPYO . o LETTERCOH PRINTING SISK MAILING SERVICE .. 8 7 .CHESAPEAKE,BAY BUSIMESS L.. 0 ATTN: HIKE NOCEBA STEVENSVIGEE;'&D" 21666 ATTN: CLYDE $I.SK,: . .... <.-. .. . '&i .. ;*- ...... ?, ...... w-ri tq ...... 4. .. .. ' ' DATE REQUIRED ' ,.. .RE: ...... I .. I ...... -...-...... -...... ,...I...... --.: ,._._..-- ?,::.:...... ll/l '9 .'. 11/18/92. ~'. GEORGIA^ RESULTS &kCIX&'$BDE rsptv .' .

:. ... Mike, please print the following:

15,000 Reply - 8 1/2 x 11 (2up) on 50# Ivory Offset. Pzints 1/1 Black over Black. Slit to 8 1/2 x 5 l/2, to yield 30H replies, then fold- headout to a CslO.hi-g& .... 4 Blueline is waved. Lettercorn to ensure superior print quality on this job...... ". . -: . . ' , ...... 'Please*retuzn artwork' and..5 samples . G7- .. . to -NR'TW 'attn:...... ',- . ... 'Tim Walker on day,.of . ...: . ... , . ;. 1480. ' d.eI ivery ...... __., '.Cost: ' Pr'inting and Shipping ...... Please call with' any: questions ' OE problem. .... Thank you...... > :' ...

.. .. . , ...... - ...... , .. ' ...... - ... ..

......

. .,. PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE

PRINTERS PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE WITH EACH INVOICE

DESK /---

310 Swann Avenue Alexandria. VA 22301 (7031 683.3105

cnal Right to Wcirk. Praddock Road SQLD_-.. TO: : ..~ ..il! . ngfield, VF1 22160 ...~... 5: .1 .. INVOICE DATE INWOICE ..- ~- . NO. ....: I1/ 18/92 035713 i-. .. PO NUMBER: C 22753 JCH trCi(33185 I NET 30 DAYS I I_- .> ... :...... -c. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT

, .-. .. GA RESULTS FEDERAN SURVEY REPLY .=..__ ..__ . 3(:t,ctOU Copies, print 2 pages cn Ivory paper, fold cut and deliver

Deliver to Sist

SUBTQT4L 1023 I 50 T I TAX for your order. We have given it our very careful attention. We appreciate your confidence in us. 1023. '50 and look forward to serving you again soon. A Project of the National Right to Work Committee November 18, 1992 Dear Georgia Member: i i I’m writing you a personal letter today because I’m very concerned about how Senator Wyche Fowler will vote on compulsory- I unionism legislation if he is sent to Washington as your U.S. ~. :i.. .. Senator to join Big Labor President Bill Clinton. .. , ..i...... ~ ii-: i.z.. - If, as a U.S. Senator, Wyche Fowler continues to vote to ...~.~~ .. hand compulsory-unionism powers to Big Labor, Georgia will i: suffer. And so will the entire nation.

.. .~..... Until now, Senator Fowler has voted with the union hierarchy .. ..~~.. ... and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses .. almost every time. ... As one of Bis Labor’s most reliable water carriers in .S..~ the :.:i ... U.S. Senate, Senator Fowler voted to pass Ted Kennedy‘s .. .~ Pushbutton Strike bill (H.R. 5/S. 55). The Strike bill failed .... . -. with only two votes to spare in the Senate. .. And in 1990, Mr. Fowler voted to allow goverment union chieftains to declare open season on harassing 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers to support the union political machine by repealing the Hatch Act. Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough Senators to override President Bush’s veto and gut the 53-year-oldlaw. Mr. Fowler’s vote in the Senate could put Big Labor over she top on these and countless other union-boss powes grabs. Orsanized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal sovernment_. Now that union bosses control the White House and have picked up strength in the Senate in the 1992 elections, Mr. Fowler could cast the key Senate vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law. Senator Fowler could vote to destroy Georgia’s hard-won Right to Work law by abolishing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, or fill Big Labor’s political coffers with taxpayer dollars by supporting legislation to force federal workers to pay union dues. That’s why I’ve urged you to inundate Senator Fowler with phone calls, letters and postcards. Thousands of angry Georgia citizens are urging him to support Right to Work. But Senator Fowler continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears.

8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 221 60 0 Tel. (800)325-7892 Whv is Wvche Fowler isnorinq you and the rest of the huse maioritv of Georqia citizens who oDwose commlsorv unionism? Union operatives have stuffed $380,000 into his cmpaigns for the U.S. Senate. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped ten times that amount into Senator Fowler's campaigns in the form of llsoft"money -- partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time paid ...... "volunteers.I* , L...... I :i . , ... ,.. So while Senator Fowler is refusing to tell Right to Work ....:.I__ _... . supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbvists know ..... he'll vote any way thev sav. It's a simple (if sleazy) arrangement. He votes their way; they bankroll his congressional <. .. .-. and senate campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American :.: :.: ~ ~. workers. ..j; . ..:.: . , .. Please call Senator Fowler now at (4041 331-0697 and urse ~~. him to rewdiate his suport for forced unionism. Only your howls ..~.... and screams can make Senator Fowler renounce his cozy relationship with Big Labor. -~ ::.. , ....-...... _i. Tell Senator Fowler you won't stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls Georgia citizens. Tell him he's not fooling anvbody, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. On the other hand, Mr. Fowler's otmonent, Paul Coverdell. did resrsond to his survev 100% for Risht to Work. Mr. Coverdell has promised to help stop Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, oppose efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and crack down on strike violence. However, Mr. Coverdell is under intense pressure from union goons to renounce his Right to Work support. It's vital that vou tell Mr. Coverdell not to back down. Please call him at (404) 320-1992 and tell him the DeoDle of Georaia sutmort his Dledse.

P.S. Senator Wyche Fowler must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now is the time, in the face of a tough U.S. Senate battle, when he is most likely to mend his Washington ways. Please call him today. 1 Nationai Right Work Committee 8001 Braddock Road Springfield, Virginia 22160. (800) 325-7892 FAX 321-7342 i lo (703)

.. The following pages are for: t; :1: :1: ...~..~.. .

__ J .. . = Total number of pages (including information sheet): -. '..:__.. .i+; _.... Date transmitted:

This fax message is intended only for the personal and confidentia! use of the addressee(s) or the designated recipient(s) named above. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applica- ble law. If YCG are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any use, review, dis- semination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us by US. mail at the address above. Thank you. TO SHIP TO e SISK MAILING SERVICE DROP 11/16/92 0 0 Am: CLYDE SISK ~... * e .::..-...... ~. .

DATE DATE REQUIRED RE: 11/17/92 ll/f8/92 GEORGIA RESULTS SPBCIAL SURmY WULSHQP

lyde, please pnocess the following:

otal mailing Qf approx 273 all to be ailed 1st Class Liwe Stamp. GA to appear in pper right Of letter. Ovelc insert 25 samples nd send to 7w attn: Tim Walker. nsert in this order face back: RB - B9 White, (AT SIX) . Affix label to show ~KUwindow. gPLY - 8 112 x 11 ZUP on Ivory, TO come fold&, R thirds headout for insertion. 3SSTER - 8 1f2 x 11 on Blue, folded heaaout. bTTeR - 8 1f2 X 11 WHITE, fold4 headout. hRIRIER - #10 SURVEY '32 BAR (#NRWCBAR). ,st : Processing Postage Lease call with any questions or problems. lank you.

PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE

PRINTERS PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE WITH EACH INVOICE. National Right to Work Committee 6 8001 Braddock Road * Springfiela, Virginia 22160 (800)325-7892 FAX (703)321-7342

Telecopier Information Sheet

This fax message is in- Comments: tended onljl for the personal and confidential use of the addressee(s) or the designated recipient(s) named above It may contain information thar is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applica- ble law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this documsn: in error and that any use, review, dis- semination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us by U.S. mail at the address above. Thank you. - NATIONAL RIG. 0 WORK COMMITTEE P.0. No. c 22783 THIS ORDER NO MUST SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22160 APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES

PuR@Ma@E@RDEW ( 0STATE ACTIVITIES PUBLIC RELATIONS a MEMBERSHIP a GENERAL PROGRAMS 0SPECIAL PROJECTS

TO SHIP TO o LETTERCOM PRINTING SISK WAILING SERVICE 0 7 CHESAPEAKE BAY BUSINESS .., 0 STEVENSVILLE, HD 21666 ...... ATTN: MIKE NOCERA !; . ATTN: CLYDE SISK :*j.,; -3 * ...... ijJ ?.=/ ATE DATE REQUIRED RE:

Mike, please print the following:

I 15,000 Reply - 8 1J2 x 11 (2upl on 50# IVQby Offset. Prints 1/1 Black over Black. Slit to 8 1/2 x 5 1/2, to yield 30M replies, then fold headout to a #lO.fjR;-gj Blueline is waved. Lettercorn Bro ensure superior pxint quality on this job, Please return artwork and 5 samples to NRTW attn: Tim Walker on day of del i very. Cost: Printing and Shipping Please call with any questions or problem. Thank you.

PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE

PRINTERS PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE WITH EACH INVOICE. i I I

~ I National Right to Work Committee 0 EGO1 Braddock Road Springfield, Virginia 22160 (800) 325-7892* FAX (703)321-7342 I

1 I Telecopier Information Sheet

~ The following pages are for:

-. .. . ;-+ Total number of pages (including information sheet): .. Date transmitted: ...i' : ! ;;

This fax message is in- Com men ts : tended only for the personal and confidential use of the addressee(s) or the designated recipient@) named above. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applica- ble law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any use, review, dis- semination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this cornmunicztion in error, please notify us immed- ately by telephone and return the original message to us by US. mail at the address above. Thank you. P.Q. NO. G NATIONAL RIG TO WORK COMMlTFEE 22782 8001 BRADDOCK ROAD THIS ORDER NO. MU27 SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22160 APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES PURGMASE (8)RDErn ( 0STATE ACTIVITIES PUBLIC RELATIONS 0MEMBERSHIP [ZI GENERAL PROGRAMS SPECIAL PROJECTS

T%~~~~~~~~~GR~PHICS S18#ph%ILXNG SERVICE . 7 CHESAPEAKE BAY BUSINESS PARK 0 STEVENSVILLE, MD. 21666 ATTN: JOHN SULLIVAN ATTN: CLYDE SISK .-... 6.; ! e

’;*r : .. . NO T.1TPER DAW17 / 9 2 DARWB9 RE GEORGIA RESULTS ROSTER

John, please print the following: Roster - 8 1/2 x 11 on 50# Blue offset. Prints. 1/1 Black over Black. Fold head out to 110. No screens. No bleeds. Elueline is waved. Eniterprise Graphics to ensure superior print quality on this job. Please return artwork with blueline and on day of delivery, along with 5 samples.

Cost: Printing and Shipping $29.33/ Please call with any questions or problems. Thank you. This is a reprint of our purchase order a22771 witn a quantity change and a paper stock change.

PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE /1 a PRINTERS: PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE WITH EACH INVOICE. p@RGMaGE@RDER

TO SHIP TO * FNTERPRISE GRAPHICS SISK MAILING SEaVICE e 7 CHESAPEAKE BAY BUSINESS PARK 0 STEVENSVILLE. MD. 21666 '. "ATTN: JOHN SULLIVAN ATTN: CLYDE SISK

DATE 1 OATE REOUIRED 1 RE:

John, please print the following: Letter - 8 1/2 x 11 on 50# WHITE offset. Prints. 1/1 Black aver Black. Fold head out to 110. No screens. No bleeds. Blueline is waved, Enterprise Graphics to ensure superior print quality on this job. Please return artwork with blueline and on day of delivery, along with 5 samples.

Cost: Printing and Shipping : 8.33/M Please call with any questions or problems. Thank you.

TW9:30M QEI 11/ 18/32.

n I - \ 2 PLEASE INVOICE IN DUPLICATE

PRINTERS PLEASE SEND ONE SAMPLE WITH EACH INVOICE. A Project of the National ff ight Po Work Corsrmlttee

8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 e Springfield, Virginia 221 60 e Tel. (800) 325-7892 November 18, 1992 Dear Georgia Member: I'm writing you a personal letter today because I'm very concerned about how Senator Wyche Fowler will vote on compulsary- ..~.... unionism legislation if he is sent to Washington as your U.S. ...;.:.. - . .. Senator to join Big Labor President Bill Clinton. ....,...... ~. 6: t::.. . U.S. .~ If, as a Senator, Wyche Fowler continues to vote to ..r; -8 . hand compulsory-unionism powers to Big Labor, Georgia will. suffer. And so will the entire nation. ...~ - Until now, Senator Fowler has voted with the union hierarchy .. ,. . ..,.: and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses almost every time. As one of Bis Labor's most reliable water carriers in the U.S. Senate. Senator Fowler voted to aass Ted Kennedv's Pushbutton Strike bill (H.R. 51s. 55). The Strike bill failed with only two votes to spare in the Senate. And in 1990, Mr. Fowler voted to allow government union chieftains to declare open season on harassing 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpyers to support the union palitical machine by repealiilg the Hatch Act. Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough Senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-oldlaw. Mr. Fowler's vote in the Senate could put Big Labor over the top on these and countless other union-boss power grabs. Oraanized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal sovernment. Now that union bosses control the Whice House and have picked up strength in the Senate in the 1992 elections, Mr. Fowler could cast the key Senate vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law. Senator Fowler could vote to destroy Georgia's hard-won Right to Work law by abolishing Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, or fill Big Labor's political coffers with taxpayer dollars by supporting legislation to force federal workers to pay unicii dues. That's why I've urged you to inundate Senator Fowler with phone calls, letters and postcards. Thousands of angry Georgia citizens are urging him to support Right to Work. But Senator Fowler continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. whv is Wvehe Fowler iunorinu you and the rest of the huqe maioritv of Geo rsia citizens who omose comnulsorv unionism? Union operatives have stuffed S3a0,OOO into his campaigns for the U.S. Senate. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union 1 political pros have probably dumped ten times that amount into I Senator Fowler's campaigns in the form of vvsoft'vmoney -- i partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time paid I 1 ;;; "volunteers. i ..-:-...... ~. . ,- So while Senator Fowler is refusing to tell Right to Work ...... ~ . -. supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbvists know ..~ .~ ...... he'll vote anv way thev say. It's a simple (if sleazy) .. arrangement. He votes their way; they bankroll his ccagressional > and senate campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American ...- . ~ , workers. ..:>-; 11-06 7 an ur . ... I tm.Only your how3 E! 1... L. ~? and screams can make Senator Fowler renounce his cozy relationship with Big Labor. I/__ __. .. : ...... > Tell Senator Fowler you won't stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls Georgia citizens. Tell him he's not fooling anvbodv, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. On the other hand, Mr. Fowler's ormonent. Paul Coverdell, did reswond to his survey 100% for Risht to Work.

Mr. Coverdell has promised to help st_ag Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, oppose efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and crack down on strike violence. However, Mr. Coverdell is under intense pressure from union goons to renounce his Right to Work support. It's vital that *mu tell Mr. Caverdell not to back down. Please call him at (404) 320-1992 and tell him the uecwle of Georsia SUDDOrt his wledue.

P.3. Senator Wyche Fowler must feel the heat from concerned citizens like you to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. Now is the time, in the face of a tough U.S. Senate battle, when he is most likely to mend his Washington ways. Please call him today. A Project of the National Right to Work Committee

__~~ ~ ~~ ~

8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 * Springfield, Virginia 221 60 e Tel. (800)325-7892 November 18, 1992 Dear Georgia Member: I'm writing you a personal letter today because Iemvery concerned about how Senator Wyche Fowler will vote on compulsory- unionism legislation if he is sent to Washington as your U.S. Senator to join Big Labor President Bill Clinton. If, as a U.S. Senator, Wyche Fowler continues to vote to hand compulsory-unionism powers to Big Labor, Georgia will suffer. And so will the entire nation. Until now, Senator Fowler has voted with the union hierarchy ..i.. ._. and against individual freedom for workers and small businesses .~.i .. .~ almost every time...... ,~ .~ As one of Bia Labor's most- reliable water carriers in the U.S. Senate. Senacor Fowler voted to wass Ted Rennedv's Pushbutton Strike bill (H.R. 5/S. 55). The Strike bill failed with only two votes to spare in the Senate. And in 1990, Mr. Fowler voted to allow government union chieftains to declare open season on harassing 2.9 million federal employees and thousands of U.S. taxpayers to support the union political machine by repealing the Hatch Act. Big Labor came just two votes shy of corralling enough Senators to override President Bush's veto and gut the 53-year-old law. Mr. Fowler's vote in the Senate could put Big Labor over the top on these and countless other union-boss power grabs. Qraanized Labor is within a whisker of total control over our federal sovernment. Now that union bosses control the White House and have picked up strength in the Senate in the 1992 elections, Mr. Fowler could cast the key Senate vote to enact the entire union-boss political agenda into law. Senator Fowler could vote to destroy Georgia's hard-won Right to Work law by abolishing Section l4(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, enact the Pushbutton Strike bill, repeal the Hatch Act, or fill Big Labor's political coffers with taxpayer dollars by supporting legislation to force federal workers to pay union dues. That's why I've urged you to inundate Senator Fowler with phone calls, letters and postcards. Thousands of angry Georgia citizens ar-3 urging him to support Right to Work. But Senator Fowler continues to stonewall. Your protests seem to be falling on deaf ears. Why is Wvche Fowler isnorins You and the rest of the huqe majority of Georsia citizens who ODDose compulsory unionism? Union operatives have stuffed $380,000 into his campaigns for the U.S. Senate. And that cash is only the tip of the iceberg. Union political pros have probably dumped ten times that amount into Senator Fowler's campaigns in the form of "soft" money -- partisan get-out-the-votedrives, phone banks, and full-time paid Itvolunteers. So while Senator Fowler is refusing to tell Right to Work supporters his position on forced unionism, union lobbvists know he'll vote any way they say. It's a simple (if sleazy) arrangement. He votes their way; they bankroll his congressional and senate campaigns with forced-union dues stolen from American workers. Please call Senator Fowler now at (404) 331-0697 and urqe him to reDudiate his sumort for forced unionism. Only howls and screams can make Senator Fowler remunce his cozy relationship with Big Labor. Tell Senator Fowler you won't stand for his political dirty pool of taking Big Labor backroom payoffs -- while he stonewalls Georgia citizens. Tell him he's not fooling anvhodv, and urge him to stop voting to force workers to pay union dues. On the other hand. Mr. Fowler's opwonent, Paul Coverdell, did respond to his survey 100% for Ricvht to Work. Mr. Coverdell has promised to help st_on Ted Kennedy's Pushbutton Strike bill, fight for tougher enforcement of the Supreme Court's ban on the use of forced dues for politics, oppose efforts to require public servants to pay union dues, and crack down on strike violence. However, Mr. Coverdell is under intense pressure from union goons to renounce his Right to Work support. It's vital that YOU tell Mr. Coverdell not to back down. Please call him at (404) 320-1992 and tell him the Deople- of Georcria surmort his dedqe.-

PACKAGE :

Cost Per

I 1 I

iisc.

7; SUB TOTAL COST PER PKG.- PLUS OVERAGE TOTAL COST December 3, 1997

Office of the General Counsel Federal Election Commission 999 E Street, NW Washington, DC 20463

Re MUR 3774, Letter dated November 17. 1997

REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

Documents are enclosed.

REQUEST FOR ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS

Please see answers below:

1 - Copies of the following Optima invoices referred to in invoices produced: #6154 referenced in Invoice #6218 (Doc. No. 0700032) MI83 referenced in Invoice #6197 (Doc. No.0700056) #6160 and #I71 referenced in Invoice #6198 (Doc. No. 07000978)

invoices were not generated. Numbers 6218, 6197, 6160 and 6171 were used for internal tracking of deposits.

2 - Copies of all scripts and revisions for the GramslMN project. It appears that only one script was produced for "senior calls," coded as CM530 (Doc. No. 0700090) and no scripts were produced for "Unidentified Perfect Voters", calls (Doc. No. 0700093). Also indicate how many calls of the total 165,398 contacts billed for the Grams campaign are attributable to each script used (Doc. No. 0700896).

No ofher scnpfs for Grams/MN project are in our possession. We are unable to answer the last sentence of this question regarding contacts billed. The breakdown of these contacts is not available. We no longer possess the data to recreate or the reports to substantiate counts.

3 - Copies of each script listed in the November 3, 1994 memo from Schweitz of MCCL to Sottong (Doc. No. 0700039) which have not been produced. For the two scripts produced (Doc. Nos. 0700020 and 0700035), please verify whether they are the scripts referenced in #Iand

8100 Boone Boulevard Vienna, Virginia 22182-2642 Telephone (703) 91 8-9000 Telecopier (703) 918-9001

. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~__- Federal Election C December 3, 1997 Page 2 of 4

#2 of the Schwietz November 3 memo. For each script used, provide the number of calls made and the cost of the calls. For the Grams calls listed in #I, please also identify the congressional district, legislative district or other geographical region(s) where the calls were made.

Copies of scripts 3 through 7 7, as listed on Doc. No. 0700039, are enclosed. Script #I on Doc. No. 0700039 is Doc. No. 0700020. Script #2 on Doc. No. 0700039 is Doc. No. 0700035. The number of calls made for each script is information thaf is not in our possession. : The cost of each call was $0.48. The number of calls made for each script is information that Is not in our , .. possession 1

4 - Copies of the sheets referenced in the November 14, 1994 memo from

.~. Sottong to Schwietz (Doc. No. 0700042) showing how many calls were ... ~. made in each legislative district.

The number of calls made for each script is information that is not in our possession.

5 - Copies of all documents referencing or relating to the “set [of records] from 10/26/94 letter from Sexton, MCCL to Sottong (Doc. No. 700036).

These documents are not In our possession

6 - Copies ofall documents relating the “PA Pro-Life Federation” calls listed in Optima Invoice #6197 and paid for by the National Right to Life Committee (Doc. No. 0700056), including but not limited to, all correspondence and memos referencing or relating to the cails and the lists used to make the calls and all scripts used for the calls. For each script used, produce all documents supporting the number of calls made, the congressional district, legislative district or other geographic region where the calls were made, and the cost of the calls.

Copies of scripts enclosed. It Is not clear if these scripts related to “PA Pro-Life Federation” or “Original Selects”. Other documents requested were either already sent or are not in our possession. Cost of the calls was $0.50. Federal Election C December 3,1997 Page 3 of 4

7 - Copies of all documents referencing or relating to the lists used to make the “Original Select“ GOTV phone calls reflected in Invoice 6197 (Doc. No. 0700056).

See answer to question Number Six

8 - Of the total 194,895positive contacts referenced under “Ori&inal Selects” in Invoice 61 97 (Doc. No. 0700056),produce all documents reflecting the number of contacts attributable to each Senate and Congressional race listed in NRLC’s GOTV list to Optima (Doc. Nos. 0700080-0700082).

.~.. These documents are not in our possession ...... ~ 9 - Copies of all scripts used by Civic Development Group for the following programs referenced in Civic Development Group invoices (Doc. NOS.0700107-07001 09, 07001 12, 07001 14-0700115,07001 17-1 19)

NL 180 These documents are not in our possession. NL 181 These documents are not in our possession. NL 182 These documents are not in our possession. NL 201A Scripts 7 to 11 on Doc. No 0700039, Question Number 3. NL 201 B These documenk are not in our possession. CM 530 These documents are not in our possession. MH 213 These documenfs are not in our possession. MH211 These documents are not in our possession. MH212 These documents are not in our possession.

Additionally, please identify the numbers heading each column showing response code results (Le., the first columns in Doc. No. 0700107 are headed, 5, 7, 16, 17,and 99.

These documents are not in our possession.

10 - Information from other sources indicates that the Civic Development Group also made phone calls for Optima for two other programs denoted as GO410 and G0410-ll. Please provide copies of all scripts for these programs.

These documents are not in our possession. Federal Election C December 3, 1997 Page 4 of 4

11 - Identify vendors QH and XH referenced on Doc. No. 0700045. Vendor QH is Advanced Database Marketing. Vendor X!i is Civic Development Group.

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers to the request for answers to questions are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. ," pLh4-$-I , .. .~ Andrew Baum Vice President

...... ~

SUBSCRIBED and SWORN before me this Third day of December, 1997. NOV- 3-94 THU 18:44 FAX NO. 0 P. 04 fi3 General Eledon 1994

I'm calling to you to vote for Gm g: for Congress and EO s ...... for Senate next Tuesday...... Thek QPPQXE~~S,JOEIN HOmGER and ANN WY3TI.A have extreme pro-abodon voting records. JOHN HOmGER and ANN even support using your tax dollars to pay €or abortions.

are against &odon-on-demmd. .~ oppose using your tax doks pay ..... ~ to

.. . .~ __ . ... using your tax dollars to pay for abortions.

His opponent, ,is pro-abortion and supports using your tax doUm to pay for abortion. NOW- 3-94 THU 18:44 FAX NO. 0 P, 05

General Election 1994

HeUo. May P speak to -3 rm calling to you to vote for GllL GUT for Congress and 8 fcz Senate next Tuesday.

Their opponents, JOHN HO R and ANN WYNHA have ewfrerrne pro-abortion voting records. JOHN HOTTNGm and A" WWAeven suggort using pwtax to pay for abortions.

T for Congress, RO 4: for Senate and next Tbesday. NOW- 3-94 THU 18:45 FAX NO P. 06

LI&( -J Qenerd Election 1994

Hello. May I speak to ?

...... S against 6 ..~. are abortion-on-demand...... -. s oQposeusin your tax dollars pay for abopfisns. ....~... es

... Pn the race f~bpMN Senate C SCWEEVEL &o opposes ~~o~on~n~e~~~ .... and opposes using your tax dohs BS pay for abortions,

for Congress, ate next Tuesday. mank you.

7hG--U\\\ e NOW 3-94 THU 18:45 FAX NO. 0 P. 07

General Election 1994

Hello. May I speak bo ?

In the Xam for ws also opposes abo~onOB de-d md opposes using your tax dollars to pay for abortions,

"he elations will be close and your vote is very imp ay I speak to 1

I'm calling to you to vote for ROD G S f~kSenate and STEVE S for MN House next Tuesday...... _. .. Pra the race for MN House STEVE SlWT is against abortion on demand md he .. opposes usimg your tax dollars to pay for abortions.

His opponent, "FF, is pro-abortion and supports using youp pay for abortbn.

WYNU has an extreme pto-aboriion voting record. A" W using your tax dollars to pay for abortions.

OD 6 S is against abortion-on-demand. RO dollars to pay for abortions.

The elections will be close and your vote is very impo-t.

Please vote for for Senate and STE fOP 'hesday.

you. NOV- 3-94 THU 18: 47 FAX NO. 0 P. 09

Hello. May I speak to ?

ou to vote for ROD G House next Tuesday,

and MARC ASCH even support using your tax dolllam to pay

BRBECKER are against &~rri0n-0n-&md. oppose using your tax dollats to pay %os

The eIectiom will be close and your vote is very imporkine.

Please vote for G for Senate and S BOP xouse next 'Wlesday.

you. NOV- 3-94 THU 18:47 FAX NO, 0 P. 10

General Election 1994

Hello. May I speak to 3

rnn calling to ask you to vote for MS for Senate and MN House next Tuesday.

The elections will be close and your vote is very irnp~rtant

Please vote for fop Senate and for House next Tuesday.

you. NOV- 3-94 THU 18:48 FAX NO. 0 P. 11

Hello. May 1 speak to ?

I’m cttlhg to ask you to vote for ROD GRAMS for Senate md far MN House ?begday. .. on ...... ~ .. - .... has been a leader passing legislation to the of your tbx .. rest& we .~.. dollm 6s pay for abortion and legislation requiring notiification of papen@ before an .. abortion is performed on their minor daughter. We need her bademhip in the MN ... .

...~ . ..

...... h the Senate race, G s opposes dbatirsn-on-de~d. s ~.~ .. QP~OSSS using YQLK o~urdollars to pay for abortions......

.... ~~ His opponent, h m extreme pro-abrtion tin voted to use your tax dollam t~ pay for abortions. P. 12

STEP G has been a leader in the fight for unborn babies in the w4%1 legislature. She hbeen endorsed by MCCL's Committee for State Fro-Life Carradidates. We need her leadership in the MN House. In ahe Senate race, S opposes abortion-on-demand . RO votes to pay for abortions.

NXA has an extreme pro-abortion voting record. supports using your tax BoUm to pay for abortionas.

"he elections tire expected to be dose and your vote is very impmtimt NOV- 4-94 FWI 2'54 NRLC P.87

cow SCRilt' #G

Hello! (May I speak with your mother or father?)

I'm calling to remind you to vote on Tuesday in the election for U.S. House and Governor. .~ ....~ ..>>~.. There are now 4,300 &onions a day, and each abortion tnkcs the life oFa living human child. i_...... (!&-abortion candidates) support abortion on demand.

idate9 oppose abortion on dcmand. and (p@ifc candidates) oppose using your Oax

.. dollars to pay for abortion.

.- Your vote is important. Picase vote on Tuesday. Thank you.

... ..-. .~...... ~ ....

National Right to Life 11/4/94 NOV- 4-94 FRI 2:54 NRhC a,Be

Hello! (May I speak With your mother or fathcr?)

I'm calling to remind you to votc on Tuesday in thc efcction Lbr U.S.House and Governor...... ~ . .. ~ There are now 4,300 abortions a day, and each abortion lakes the life of a living, human child. ..~ .. .. . ~. pro-life candidatesj oppose abortion on demand. and (pro-lik candidarcsf oppose using your tiof dollars to pay for abortion.

Your vote is important. Please votc on Tuesday. Thank you. Hello! (May 1 speak with your mother or father'?)

I'm calling to remind you to votc on Tuesday in tiw ciection klr L! S Senate and Governor.

, .. There are now 4,300 abortions 8 day. and each aborrioii I:II(CS tlic lilh of a living, human child.

(Pro-abortion candidms) support abortion on dcm;rntl

(Pro-life candidates) oppose abortion on demand. (p!~ro:lil~- ~ndii) oppose using your tax dollars to pay for abortion.

Your vote is important. Please vote on Tuesday. Thank you

National Right to Life 11/4/94