GEO PUBLICATION No. 1/2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GEO PUBLICATION No. 1/2006 GEO PUBLICATION No. 1/2006 FOUNDATION DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OFFICE Civil Engineering and Development Department The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 2 © The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region First published, 2006 Prepared by : Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering and Development Department, Civil Engineering and Development Building, 101 Princess Margaret Road, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong. Captions of Figures on the Front Cover Top Left : Construction of Large-diameter Bored Piles Top Right : Pile Loading Test Using Osterberg Load Cell Bottom Left : Foundations in Marble Bottom Right : Construction of Large-diameter Bored Piles on Slope 3 FOREWORD This publication is a reference document that presents a review of the principles and practice related to design and construction of foundation, with specific reference to ground conditions in Hong Kong. The information given in the publication should facilitate the use of modern methods and knowledge in foundation engineering. The Geotechnical Engineering Office published in 1996 a reference document (GEO Publication No. 1/96) on pile design and construction with a Hong Kong perspective. In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on the use of rational design methods in foundation engineering. Many high-quality instrumented pile loading tests were conducted, which had resulted in better understanding of pile behaviour and more economic foundation solutions. The Geotechnical Engineering Office sees the need to revise the publication to consolidate the experience gained and improvement made in the practice of foundation design and construction. The scope of the publication is also expanded to cover the key design aspects for shallow foundations, in response to the request of the practitioners. Hence, a new publication title is used. The preparation of this publication is under the overall direction of a Working Group. The membership of the Working Group, given on the next page, includes representatives from relevant government departments, the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers and the Hong Kong Construction Association. Copies of a draft version of this document were circulated to local professional bodies, consulting engineers, contractors, academics, government departments and renowned overseas experts in the field of foundation engineering. Many individuals and organisations made very useful comments, many of which have been adopted in finalising this document. Their contributions are gratefully acknowledged. The data available to us from instrumented pile loading tests in Hong Kong are collated in this publication. Practitioners are encouraged to help expand this pile database by continuing to provide us with raw data from local instrumented pile loading tests. The data can be sent to Chief Geotechnical Engineer/Standards and Testing. Practitioners are encouraged to provide comments to the Geotechnical Engineering Office at any time on the contents of the publication, so that improvements can be made in future editions. Raymond K S Chan Head, Geotechnical Engineering Office January 2006 4 WORKING GROUP : Architectural Services Department Mr. Li W.W. Buildings Department Mr. Cheng M.L. Civil Engineering and Development Department Mr. Pun W.K. (Chairman) Mr. Ken Ho K.S. Dr. Richard Pang P.L. Mr. Vincent Tse S.H. Dr. Dominic Lo O.K. Mr. Sammy Cheung P.Y. (Secretary) Highways Department Mr. Li W. (before 1 December 2004) Mr. Yeung S.K. (between 1 December 2004 and 3 May 2005) Mr. Anthony Yuen W.K. (after 3 May 2005) Hong Kong Construction Association (Piling Contractor Subcommittee) Mr. David Chiu C.H. Hong Kong Institution of Engineers (Civil Division) Mr. Timothy Suen Hong Kong Institution of Engineers (Geotechnical Division) Dr. Daman Lee D.M. Hong Kong Institution of Engineers (Structural Division) Mr. Kwan K.K. Housing Department Dr. John Lai Y.K. Mr. Pang C.F. 5 CONTENTS Page No. TITLE PAGE 1 FOREWORD 3 WORKING GROUP 4 CONTENTS 5 LIST OF TABLES 15 LIST OF FIGURES 17 LIST OF PLATES 21 1. INTRODUCTION 23 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 23 1.2 GENERAL GUIDANCE 24 2. SITE INVESTIGATION, GEOLOGICAL MODELS AND 25 SELECTION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS 2.1 GENERAL 25 2.2 DESK STUDIES 25 2.2.1 Site History 25 2.2.2 Details of Adjacent Structures and Existing Foundations 26 2.2.3 Geological Studies 26 2.2.4 Groundwater 33 2.3 EXECUTION OF GROUND INVESTIGATION 33 2.4 EXTENT OF GROUND INVESTIGATION 33 2.4.1 General Sites 33 6 Page No. 2.4.2 Sites Underlain by Marble 34 2.5 SOIL AND ROCK SAMPLING 36 2.6 DETECTION OF AGGRESSIVE GROUND 36 2.7 INSITU AND LABORATORY TESTING 37 2.8 ESTABLISHING A GEOLOGICAL MODEL 38 2.9 SELECTION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS 39 3. SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS 41 3.1 GENERAL 41 3.2 DESIGN OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON SOILS 42 3.2.1 Determination of Bearing Capacity of Soils 42 3.2.1.1 General 42 3.2.1.2 Empirical methods 42 3.2.1.3 Bearing capacity theory 42 3.2.2 Foundations On or Near the Crest of a Slope 46 3.2.3 Factors of Safety 46 3.2.4 Settlement Estimation 48 3.2.4.1 General 48 3.2.4.2 Foundations on granular soils 49 3.2.4.3 Foundations on fine-grained soils 50 3.2.5 Lateral Resistance of Shallow Foundations 51 3.3 DESIGN OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON ROCK 51 3.4 PLATE LOADING TEST 52 3.5 RAFT FOUNDATIONS 53 4. TYPES OF PILE 55 4.1 CLASSIFICATION OF PILES 55 4.2 LARGE-DISPLACEMENT PILES 56 4.2.1 General 56 4.2.2 Precast Reinforced Concrete Piles 56 4.2.3 Precast Prestressed Spun Concrete Piles 57 4.2.4 Closed-ended Steel Tubular Piles 57 7 Page No. 4.2.5 Driven Cast-in-place Concrete Piles 58 4.3 SMALL-DISPLACEMENT PILES 58 4.3.1 General 58 4.3.2 Steel H-piles 58 4.3.3 Open-ended Steel Tubular Piles 59 4.4 REPLACEMENT PILES 59 4.4.1 General 59 4.4.2 Machine-dug Piles 59 4.4.2.1 Mini-piles 60 4.4.2.2 Socketed H-piles 60 4.4.2.3 Continuous flight auger piles 60 4.4.2.4 Large-diameter bored piles 61 4.4.2.5 Barrettes 61 4.4.3 Hand-dug Caissons 62 4.5 SPECIAL PILE TYPES 65 4.5.1 General 65 4.5.2 Shaft- and Base-grouted Piles 65 4.5.3 Jacked Piles 66 4.5.4 Composite Piles 67 5. CHOICE OF PILE TYPE AND DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY 69 5.1 GENERAL 69 5.2 FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED IN CHOICE OF PILE TYPE 69 5.2.1 Ground Conditions 69 5.2.2 Complex Ground Conditions 71 5.2.3 Nature of Loading 73 5.2.4 Effects of Construction on Surrounding 73 Structures and Environment 5.2.5 Site and Plant Constraints 74 5.2.6 Safety 74 5.2.7 Programme and Cost 75 5.3 REUSE OF EXISTING PILES 75 5.3.1 General 75 5.3.2 Verifications of Conditions 76 5.3.3 Durability Assessment 76 5.3.4 Load-carrying Capacity 77 5.3.5 Other Design Aspects 77 5.4 DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY 78 8 Page No. 5.4.1 Contractor's Design 78 5.4.2 Engineer's Design 78 5.4.3 Discussions 79 6. DESIGN OF SINGLE PILES AND DEFORMATION OF PILES 81 6.1 GENERAL 81 6.2 PILE DESIGN IN RELATION TO GEOLOGY 81 6.3 DESIGN PHILOSOPHIES 82 6.3.1 General 82 6.3.2 Global Factor of Safety Approach 82 6.3.3 Limit State Design Approach 82 6.3.4 Discussions on Design Approaches 84 6.3.5 Recommended Factors of Safety 85 6.3.6 Planning for Future Redevelopments 87 6.4 AXIALLY LOADED PILES IN SOIL 87 6.4.1 General 87 6.4.2 Pile Driving Formulae 88 6.4.3 Wave Equation Analysis 91 6.4.4 Use of Soil Mechanics Principles 91 6.4.4.1 General 91 6.4.4.2 Critical depth concept 91 6.4.4.3 Bored piles in granular soils 93 6.4.4.4 Driven piles in granular soils 97 6.4.4.5 Bored piles in clays 98 6.4.4.6 Driven piles in clays 99 6.4.4.7 Other factors affecting shaft resistance 100 6.4.4.8 Effect of soil plug on open-ended pipe piles 100 6.4.5 Correlation with Standard Penetration Tests 101 6.4.5.1 General 101 6.4.5.2 End-bearing resistance 101 6.4.5.3 Shaft resistance 101 6.4.6 Correlation with Other Insitu Tests 103 6.5 AXIALLY LOADED PILES IN ROCK 103 6.5.1 General 103 6.5.2 Driven Piles in Rock 104 6.5.3 Bored Piles in Rock 104 6.5.3.1 General 104 6.5.3.2 Semi-empirical methods 105 6.5.3.3 Bearing capacity theories 111 6.5.3.4 Insitu tests 111 9 Page No. 6.5.3.5 Presumptive bearing values 111 6.5.4 Rock Sockets 114 6.6 UPLIFT CAPACITY OF PILES 117 6.6.1 Piles in Soil 117 6.6.2 Rock Sockets 119 6.6.3 Cyclic Loading 120 6.7 LATERAL LOAD CAPACITY OF PILES 121 6.7.1 Vertical Piles in Soil 121 6.7.2 Inclined Loads 129 6.7.3 Raking Piles in Soil 129 6.7.4 Rock Sockets 129 6.7.5 Cyclic Loading 131 6.8 NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION 131 6.8.1 General 131 6.8.2 Calculation of Negative Skin Friction 132 6.8.3 Field Observations in Hong Kong 134 6.8.4 Means of Reducing Negative Skin Friction 135 6.9 TORSION 135 6.10 PRELIMINARY PILES FOR DESIGN EVALUATION 135 6.11 PILE DESIGN IN KARST MARBLE 137 6.12 STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PILES 141 6.12.1 General 141 6.12.2 Lifting Stresses 141 6.12.3 Driving and Working Stresses 141 6.12.4 Bending and Buckling of Piles 142 6.12.5 Mini-piles 143 6.13 DEFORMATION OF SINGLE PILES 143 6.13.1 General 143 6.13.2 Axial Loading 146 6.13.2.1 General 146 6.13.2.2 Load transfer method 146 6.13.2.3 Elastic continuum methods 146 6.13.2.4 Numerical methods 150 6.13.2.5 Determination of deformation parameters 152 6.13.3 Lateral Loading 155 6.13.3.1 General 155 6.13.3.2 Equivalent cantilever method 156 6.13.3.3 Subgrade reaction method 156 10 Page No.
Recommended publications
  • Application of Geodetic Measuring Methods for Reliable Evaluation of Static Load Test Results of Foundation Piles
    remote sensing Article Application of Geodetic Measuring Methods for Reliable Evaluation of Static Load Test Results of Foundation Piles Zbigniew Muszy ´nski 1,* and Jarosław Rybak 2 1 Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland 2 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Geodetic measuring methods are widely used in the course of various geotechnical works. The main purpose is usually related to the location in space, geometrical dimensions, settlements, deflections, and other forms of displacements and their consequences. This study focuses on the application of selected surveying methods in static load tests (SLTs) of foundation piles. Basic aspects of the SLT are presented in the introductory section, together with the explanation of the authors’ motivation behind the novel (but already sufficiently tested) application of remote methods introduced to confirm, through inverse analysis, the load applied to the pile head under testing at every stage of its loading. Materials and methods are described in the second section in order to provide basic information on the test site and principles of the SLT method applied. The case study shows the methodology of displacement control in the particular test, which is described in light of a Citation: Muszy´nski,Z.; Rybak, J. presented review of geodetic techniques for displacement control, especially terrestrial laser scanning Application of Geodetic Measuring and robotic tacheometry. The geotechnical testing procedure, which is of secondary importance for Methods for Reliable Evaluation of the current study, is also introduced in order to emphasize the versatility of the proposed method.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodiversity, Geoconservation and Geotourism in Hong Kong Global
    Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 126 (2015) 426–437 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pgeola Geodiversity, geoconservation and geotourism in Hong Kong Global Geopark of China Lulin Wang *, Mingzhong Tian, Lei Wang School of Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: In addition to being an international financial center, Hong Kong has rich geodiversity, in terms of a Received 22 November 2014 representative and comprehensive system of coastal landscapes, with scientific value in the study of Received in revised form 20 February 2015 Quaternary global sea-level changes, and esthetic, recreational and cultural value for tourism. The value Accepted 26 February 2015 of the coastal landscapes in Hong Kong was globally recognized when Hong Kong Global Geopark Available online 14 April 2015 (HKGG), which was developed under the well-established framework of Hong Kong Country Parks and Marine Parks, was accepted in the Global Geoparks Network (GGN) in 2011. With over 30 years of Keywords: experience gained from managing protected areas and a concerted effort to develop geoconservation and Coastal landscape geotourism, HKGG has reached a mature stage of development and can provide a well-developed Hong Kong Global Geopark Geodiversity example of successful geoconservation and geotourism in China. This paper analyzes the geodiversity, Geoconservation geoconservation and geotourism of HKGG. The main accomplishments summarized in this paper are Geotourism efficient conservation management, an optimized tourism infrastructure, a strong scientific interpretation system, mass promotion and education materials, active exchange with other geoparks, continuous training, and effective collaboration with local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 289 Combination of Bidirectional-Cell Test and Conventional Head-Down
    Orchard Central, Singapore Fellenius, B.H., and Tan, S.A., 2010. Combination of bidirectional-cell test and conventional head-down test. The Art of Foundation Engineering Practice, ""Honoring Clyde Baker", ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, Edited by M.H. Hussein, J.B. Anderson, and W.M. Camp, GSP 198, pp. 240-259. Combination of bidirectional-cell test and conventional head-down test Bengt H. Fellenius1), M.ASCE and Tan Siew Ann2), M.ASCE 1) 2475 Rothesay Avenue, Sidney, British Columbia, V8L 2B9. <[email protected]> 2) Civil Engineering Department, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260. <[email protected]> ABSTRACT. Bidirectional-cell tests were performed in Singapore on four bored piles in a residual soil and underlying weathered, highly fractured bedrock called the Bukit Timah Granite formation. Two of the piles were 1.2 m diameter, uninstrumented, and 28 m and 38 m long. The other two were strain-gage instrumented, 1.0 m diameter piles, both 37 m long. The latter tests combined the cell test with conventional head-down testing. Analysis of the test results indicated that the pile toe stiffness was low. The evaluation of the strain-gage data showed that the pile material modulus was a function of the induced strain. The desired axial working load was 10 MN, and the combined cell and head-down tests correlated to a head-down test with a maximum applied load of 38 MN, which, although smaller than the ultimate resistance of the piles, was taken as the capacity of piles constructed similar to the second set of test piles at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • PWSC(2021-22)5 on 21 April 2021
    For discussion PWSC(2021-22)5 on 21 April 2021 ITEM FOR PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE OF FINANCE COMMITTEE HEAD 705 – CIVIL ENGINEERING Transport – Ferry Piers 58TF – Improvement works at Kau Sai Village Pier 59TF – Improvement works at Lai Chi Chong Pier Members are invited to recommend to the Finance Committee – (a) the upgrading of 58TF to Category A at an estimated cost of $77.8 million in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices; and (b) the upgrading of 59TF to Category A at an estimated cost of $108.8 million in MOD prices. PROBLEM We need to carry out the following works – (a) 58TF for reconstruction of Kau Sai Village Pier to improve the berthing condition and facilities of the pier; and (b) 59TF for reconstruction of Lai Chi Chong Pier to improve the structural condition and facilities of the pier. /PROPOSAL ….. PWSC(2021-22)5 Page 2 PROPOSAL 2. The Director of Civil Engineering and Development, with the support of the Secretary for Development, proposes to upgrade the following projects to Category A – (a) 58TF at an estimated cost of $77.8 million in MOD prices for the reconstruction of Kau Sai Village Pier; and (b) 59TF at an estimated cost of $108.8 million in MOD prices for the reconstruction of Lai Chi Chong Pier. PROJECT SCOPE 3. Details of the above two projects are provided at Enclosures 1 and 2 respectively. -------------------------------------- Development Bureau April 2021 Enclosure 1 to PWSC(2021-22)5 58TF – Improvement works at Kau Sai Village Pier PROJECT SCOPE We propose to upgrade 58TF to Category A and the scope of works comprises – (a) reconstruction of the existing pier, including provision of ancillary facilities such as roof cover, lighting system, benches, solar panels, Wi-Fi device, etc.; and (b) environmental monitoring and mitigation measures for the proposed works.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE)
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING This paper was downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). The library is available here: https://www.issmge.org/publications/online-library This is an open-access database that archives thousands of papers published under the Auspices of the ISSMGE and maintained by the Innovation and Development Committee of ISSMGE. Section 3B Fondations sur pieux Piled Foundations Sujets de discussion : Détermination de la force portante d’une fondation à partir des indications des pénétromètres. Influence du groupement des pieux sur la force portante et le tassement. Subjects for discussion : Determination of the bearing capacity of a foundation from penetrometer tests. Pile groups; bearing capacity and settlement. Président / Chairman : E. Schultze, Allemagne. Vice-Président / Vice-Chairman : H. C ourbot, France. Rapporteur Général / General Reporter : L. Z eevaert, Mexique. Membres du Groupe de discussion / Members o f the Panel : E. G euze, U.S.A.; J. K erisel, France; T. M ogami, Japon; N- N ajdanovic, Yougoslavie ; R.B. Peck, U.S.A.; M. V argas, Brésil. Discussion orale / Oral Discussion V. Berezantsev, U.R.S.S. R. B. Peck, U.S.A. L. Bjerrum, Norvège H. Petermann, Allemagne A. J. L. Bolognesi, Argentine R. Pietkowski, Pologne A. Casagrande, U.S.A. H. Simons, Allemagne T. K. Chaplin, Grande-Bretagne G. F. Sowers, U.S.A. A. J. Da Costa Nunes, Brésil C. Szechy, Hongrie E. de Beer, Belgique C. Van der Veen, Hollande C. Djanoeff, Grande-Bretagne M. Vargas, Brésil O. Eide, Norvège E.
    [Show full text]
  • Borrow Pit Volumes**
    EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION AND LAYOUT **BORROW PIT VOLUMES** When trying to figure out Borrow Pit Problems you need to understand a few things. 1. Water can be added or removed from soil 2. The MASS of the SOLIDS CAN NOT be changed 3. Need to know phase relationships in soil….which I will show you next Phase relationship in Soil This represents the soil that you take from a borrow pit. It is made up of AIR, WATER, and SOLIDS. AIR WATER So if you separated the soil into its components it would look like this. It is referred to as a Soil Phase Diagram. SOIL When looking at a Soil Phase Diagram you think of it two ways, 1. Volume, 2. Mass. Volume Mass Va AIR Ma = 0 Va = Volume Air Ma = Mass Air = 0 V WATER M Vw = Volume Water w w Mw = Mass Water Vs = Volume Solid Ms = Mass Solid Vs SOIL Ms Vt = Volume Total = Va + Vw + Vs Mt = Mass Total = Mw + Ms EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION AND LAYOUT **BORROW PIT VOLUMES** Basic Terms/Formulas to know – Soil Phase relationship Specific Gravity = the density of the solids divided by the density of Water Moisture Content = Mass of Water divided by the Mass of Solids Void Ratio = Volume of Voids divided by the Volume of Solids Porosity = Volume of Voids divided by the Total Volume, Higher porosity = higher permeability Density of Water = γwater = Mw/Vw Specific Gravity = Gs = γsolids /γwater =M /(V * γ ) English Units = 62.42 pounds per CF(pcf) s s water SI Units = 1,000 g/liter = 1,000kg/m3 Moisture Content (w) = Mw/Ms Porosity (n) = Vv/Vt Vv = Volume of Voids = Vw + Va Vt = Total Volume = Vs +Vw + Va Degree of Saturation
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of Cone Penetration Tests in Cohesive Soils
    Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/22 INTERPRETATION OF CONE PENETRATION TESTS IN COHESIVE SOILS by Kwang Kyun Kim Graduate Research Assistant Monica Prezzi Assistant Professor and Rodrigo Salgado Professor School of Civil Engineering Purdue University Joint Transportation Research Program Project No. C-36-45T File No. 6-18-18 SPR-2632 Conducted in Cooperation with the Indiana Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration or the Indiana Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana December 2006 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/22 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Interpretation of Cone Penetration tests in Cohesive Soils December 2006 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kwang Kyun Kim and Rodrigo Salgado FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/22 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Joint Transportation Research Program 550 Stadium Mall Drive Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907-2051 11. Contract or Grant No. SPR-2632 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Indiana Department of Transportation State Office Building Final Report 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Element Study on Static Pile Load Testing Li Yi A
    FINITE ELEMENT STUDY ON STATIC PILE LOAD TESTING LI YI (B.Eng) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2004 Dedicated to my family and friends ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to express his sincere gratitude and appreciation to his supervisor, Associate Professor Harry Tan Siew Ann, for his continual encouragement and bountiful support that have made my postgraduate study an educational and fruitful experience. In addition, the author would also like to thank Mr. Thomas Molnit (Project Manager, LOADTEST Asia Pte. Ltd.), Mr. Tian Hai (Former NUS postgraduate, KTP Consultants Pte. Ltd.), for their assistance in providing the necessary technical and academic documents during this project. Finally, the author is grateful to all my friends and colleagues for their help and friendship. Special thanks are extended to Ms. Zhou Yun. Her spiritual support made my thesis’ journey an enjoyable one. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................ii SUMMARY................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES......................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................vii
    [Show full text]
  • Division 2 Earthwork
    Division 2 Earthwork 2-01 Clearing, Grubbing, and Roadside Cleanup 2-01.1 Description The Contractor shall clear, grub, and clean up those areas staked or described in the Special Provisions. This Work includes protecting from harm all trees, bushes, shrubs, or other objects selected to remain. “Clearing” means removing and disposing of all unwanted material from the surface, such as trees, brush, down timber, or other natural material. “Grubbing” means removing and disposing of all unwanted vegetative matter from underground, such as sod, stumps, roots, buried logs, or other debris. “Roadside cleanup”, whether inside or outside the staked area, means Work done to give the roadside an attractive, finished appearance. “Debris” means all unusable natural material produced by clearing, grubbing, or roadside cleanup. 2-01.2 Disposal of Usable Material and Debris The Contractor shall meet all requirements of state, county, and municipal regulations regarding health, safety, and public welfare in the disposal of all usable material and debris. The Contractor shall dispose of all debris by one or more of the disposal methods described below. 2-01.2(1) Disposal Method No. 1 – Open Burning The open burning of residue resulting from land clearing is restricted by Chapter 173-425 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC). No commercial open burning shall be conducted without authorization from the Washington State Department of Ecology or the appropriate local air pollution control authority. All burning operations shall be strictly in accordance with these authorizations. 2-01.2(2) Disposal Method No. 2 – Waste Site Debris shall be hauled to a waste site obtained and provided by the Contractor in accordance with Section 2-03.3(7)C.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Plugging of Open-Ended Piles During Impact Driving in Cohesion-Less Soil
    Soil Plugging of Open-Ended Piles During Impact Driving in Cohesion-less Soil VICTOR KARLOWSKIS Master of Science Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2014 © Victor Karlowskis 2014 Master of Science thesis 14/13 Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering Division of Soil and Rock Mechanics ABSTRACT Abstract During impact driving of open-ended piles through cohesion-less soil the internal soil column may mobilize enough internal shaft resistance to prevent new soil from entering the pile. This phenomena, referred to as soil plugging, changes the driving characteristics of the open-ended pile to that of a closed-ended, full displacement pile. If the plugging behavior is not correctly understood, the result is often that unnecessarily powerful and costly hammers are used because of high predicted driving resistance or that the pile plugs unexpectedly such that the hammer cannot achieve further penetration. Today the user is generally required to model the pile response on the basis of a plugged or unplugged pile, indicating a need to be able to evaluate soil plugging prior to performing the drivability analysis and before using the results as basis for decision. This MSc. thesis focuses on soil plugging during impact driving of open-ended piles in cohesion-less soil and aims to contribute to the understanding of this area by evaluating models for predicting soil plugging and driving resistance of open-ended piles. Evaluation was done on the basis of known soil plugging mechanisms and practical aspects of pile driving. Two recently published models, one for predicting the likelihood of plugging and the other for predicting the driving resistance of open-ended piles, were compared to existing models.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Appendix 1 Issue of “2014 Hong Kong Definitive Stamps” and New
    Appendix 1 Issue of “2014 Hong Kong Definitive Stamps” and New Philatelic Products on 24 July 2014 A set of new “2014 Hong Kong Definitive Stamps” is designed by Ms. Shirman LAI and printed in lithography by Joh. Enschede B.V. of the Netherlands. “2014 Hong Kong Definitive Stamps” will be released on 24 July 2014. In parallel, “2006 Hong Kong Definitive Stamps” on the theme of birds, officially released on 31 December 2006, will continue to be on sale while stock lasts. In addition to the stamps and philatelic products of the new set of definitive stamps, an official souvenir cover and other philatelic products have been created to commemorate the concurrent sale of two sets of Hong Kong definitive stamps. They will also be released on the stamp issue day. Official First Day Covers for “2014 Hong Kong Definitive Stamps” at $1.2 each for small-sized covers and $2.2 each for large-sized covers as well as Official Souvenir Covers to commemorate the concurrent sale of the 2006 Hong Kong Definitive Stamps and the 2014 Hong Kong Definitive Stamps at $1.2 each will be on sale at all post offices from 10 July 2014. Advance orders for the additional philatelic products comprising two sets of definitive stamps can be placed at all post offices and online or mailed in from 26 May to 15 June 2014. These items and associated philatelic products will be displayed at the General Post Office, Tsim Sha Tsui Post Office, Tsuen Wan Post Office, Sha Tin Central Post Office and Tuen Mun Central Post Office from July 10.
    [Show full text]
  • A Qljarter Century of Geotechnical Researcll
    A QlJarter Century of Geotechnical Researcll PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-RD-98-139 FEBRUARY 1999 1111111111111111111111111111111 PB99-147365 \c-c.J/t).:.. L~.i' . u.s. D~~~~~~~Co~~~~~erce~ Natronal_Tec~nical Information Service u.s. DepartillCi"li of Transportation Spnngfleld, Virginia 22161 Research, Development & Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 FOREWORD This report summarizes Federal Highway Administration (FHW!\) geotechnical research and development activities during the past 25 years. The report incl!Jde~: significant accomplishments in the areas of bridge foundations, ground improvenl::::nt, and soil and rock behavior. A fourth category included important miscellaneous efrorts tl'12t did not fit the areas mentioned. The report vlill be useful to re~earchers and praGtitior,c:;rs in geotechnology. --------:"--; /~ /1 I~t(./l- /-~~:r\ .. T. Paul Teng (j Director, Office of Infrastructure Research, Development. and Technologv NOTiCE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States G~)\fernm8nt assumes no liahillty for its contt?!nts or use thereof. Thir. report dor~s not constiil)tl":: a standard, specification, or regu!p,tion. The; United States Government does not endorse products or n18;1ufaGturers, Traderrlc,rks or nianufacturers' narl1es appear in thi;-, report only bec:8'I)Se they arc considered essential to tile object of the document. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-RD-98-139 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date A Quarter Century of Geotechnical Research February 1999 6. Performing Organization Code ).
    [Show full text]