DOCSLIB.ORG

Sonoma County Sheriff's Department

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sonoma County Sheriff's Department SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY VEHICLE OPERATION COURSE E.V.O.C. TWO-DAY (18 HOUR) NEW HIRE ORIENTATION PROGRAM Course Goal This course will provide the trainee with more than the minimum topics of driver training/awareness skills and techniques required in the POST Perishable Skills Training Program including; Basic Driving Principles, Legal and Moral Aspects, Defensive Driving and Maneuvering Course Exercises. The course consists of classroom instruction and behind-the- wheel, practical Driver Training and Awareness for newly hired deputies. Driver Training/Awareness Topics and Exercises: 1. Classroom presentation / Student Evaluation / Testing 2. Defensive driving 3. Backing/parking exercises 4. Vehicle dynamics 5. Practical exercises to improve driving skills, judgment and decision making 6. Department Policy, State Law, legal and moral issues 7. Intersection exercises 8. Code 3 driving/urgent response 9. Vehicle maintenance/care/road conditions 10. Pursuit driving 11. P.I.T. 12. Spike Strip Course Objectives The trainee will: 1. Demonstrate knowledge of his/her driver training/awareness skills and techniques. 2. The student will demonstrate a minimum standard of psychomotor skills with every technique and exercise, to include: a. Judgment b. Decision making c. Defensive driving d. Basic driving principles e. Department Policy, State Law, legal and moral issues f. Vehicle dynamics -1- EXPANDED COURSE OUTLINE I. Introduction POST REF SUPPORT MATERIALS A. Introduction and Registration B. Course Objectives, Overview, Exercises, Evaluation and Testing II. Driving Knowledge A. California Vehicle Code II(f) 1. 17001 CVC 2. 17004 CVC 3. 17004.7 CVC 4. 21052 CVC 5. 21055 CVC 6. 21056 CVC 7. 21057 CVC 8. 21806 CVC 9. 21807 CVC 10. 22350 CVC B. Sonoma County Sheriff’s Department Policy 7-02 Pursuit of Vehicles 1. Officer Safety Considerations, Risk Assessment 2. Communications 4. Legal Requirements, liabilities and moral responsibilities 3. Pursuit Video C. Sonoma County Sheriff’s Department Policy 7-03 Non-Pursuit Code 3 Driving 1. Officer Safety Considerations, Risk Assessment 2. Communications 3. Legal Requirements, liabilities and moral responsibilities D. Sonoma County Sheriff’s Department Policy 7-05 Investigation of Vehicle Collisions 1. Officer Safety Considerations a. Medical Aid 2. Communications 3. Legal Requirements, liabilities and reporting responsibilities 4. Jurisdictional responsibility E. Sonoma County Sheriff’s Department Policy 6-08 Use of Stinger Spike Strip 1. Officer Safety Considerations, Risk Assessment -2- 2. Communications 3. Spike Strip Video F. Case Law pertaining to Law Enforcement Vehicles G. Moral aspects of Law Enforcement Driving III. Vehicle Care and Maintenance a. Inspection prior to patrol shift 1. General Appearance a. body damage b. cleanliness 2. Tires / Wheels / Rims a. pressure b. wear c. condition d. damage 3. Lighting and Emergency Equipment (siren, horn) a. siren b. horns c. P.A./ mic /speaker d. headlights, break lights, blinkers, parking lights 4. Trunk Equipment a. Flares b. Fire extinguisher c. Medical kit d. Spare tire, lug wrench, jack, wheel chalks e. Spike Strip 5. Interior a. Check Fuel, Oil, water temperature gauges b. Adjust seat, mirrors, seatbelt c. Clean windows, remove debris, shred sensitive material d. Thoroughly inspect prisoner area 6. Listen for unusual sounds a. Brake feel b. Transmission slippage c. Accelerator responsiveness d. Power Steering III. Vehicle Dynamics/Driver/Environmental Factors A. Weight Transfer -3- Weight transfer is the shifting of weight to the front, rear, or either side of a vehicle caused by acceleration, deceleration, braking, or steering. 1. On a stationary vehicle, the vehicle’s weight is distributed between the front and rear wheels. 2. Due to engine placement, weight distribution is seldom equal. The engine location decides the location of the greater part of the weight distribution. 3. Types of weight transfer: a. Lateral: side to side b. Longitudinal: front to rear/rear to front 4. Lateral weight transfer is created when the vehicle is turned right or left from its course of travel. 5. Causes of longitudinal weight transfer: a. Braking/rear to front b. Accelerating/front to rear c. Decelerating/rear to front 6. Spring loading: a. A vehicle’s weight is mainly supported by its springs (approximately 80- 90%). b. Weight transfer causes compression of the vehicle’s springs. (1) Compression is “spring loading”. (2) “Unloading” of springs occurs when compressed springs release to a neutral position. (3) Steering, throttle, or braking will influence weight transfer. 7. Weight transfer can’t be eliminated from a moving vehicle, but it can be minimized by good driving techniques and smooth operation. B Steering 1. Hand position 3 & 9 / 8 & 4 a. Why? Because of airbags. b. 12 o’clock position for backing. c. Left leg/foot braced between floorboard and bottom of steering wheel. (1) Body weight on right hip allows viewing out rear window. 2. Shuffle steering a. A balanced two-hand steering method with the right hand controlling the left half of the steering wheel. Both hands remain in contact with the steering wheel and do an equal amount of work. 3. Front-end swing a. When backing, the front of the car will swing out as much as four feet opposite the direction that you are turning. Front-end swing can cause a collision if the driver fails to allow sufficient clearance. 4. Rear wheel cheat a. While driving forward during a turn, the rear tires will track along a path inside that of the front tires. 5. Understeer -4- a. Reduction of traction of the front tires tends to cause the vehicle to continue in a straight line with lessening of directional steering control (usually induced by excessive speed). 6. Over steer a. Reduction of traction to the rear tires during a steering movement causes the rear of the vehicle to slide to the outside. C. Braking 1. Types a. ABS (1) Anti-lock brake system. (2) Prevents brake lock-up. (3) Allows wheels to turn while applying brakes. (4) Brakes will clatter when engaged. b. Threshold (1) Definition: The maximum amount of brake pedal pressure just short of locking the brakes. (2) Quicker speed reduction. (3) Most effective way to stop vehicle on a slick roadway. c. Left foot braking (1) Not acceptable (2) Tendency to ride brake pedal which generates heat, reduces braking effectiveness D. Driver, Roadway Position 1. Definition: The position of the vehicle on the roadway that maximizes speed with minimum steering and risk of loss of vehicle control while negotiating a turn. (Also known as driving line.) 2. Diagram – 90 degree turn constant radius 3. Diagram – increasing radius turn 4. Diagram – decreasing radius turn E. Speed Judgment 1. The ability of a driver to estimate a safe vehicular speed for any given driving situation. 2. Diagram – vehicle distance. F. Environmental Factors 1. Weather a. Fog b. Heat c. Rain -5- d. Hydroplaning 2. Road Conditions a. Narrow b. Two-lane c. Gravel / un-maintained county roads d. Redwood tree debris / black ice 3. Fatigue 4. Attitude 5. Adrenaline 6. Visual Horizon a. Definition: The point at which a driver’s eyes are focused on the roadway. 7. Peripheral Vision a. Definition: A lateral degree of perception present when the eyes are focused straight ahead. 8. Tunnel Vision a. Definition: Constriction of the visual field resulting in loss of peripheral vision. 9. Driver Tactics and Considerations a. Radio b. MDT/computer c. Stop in safe place before using any equipment that requires you to take your eyes off the roadway. III. Slow Speed Maneuvers II (a,b,c,e,,g) II (1-5) A. Offset Lane Exercise B. Turn-Around Maneuver Exercise C. Steering Course Exercise D. “T” Driveway E. Parallel Parking Exercises 1. Both left and right side. Evaluation/Test IV. Accident Avoidance II (a,b,d) IV (1-5) A. 25 mph – 10 times Evaluation/Test B. 35 mph – 10 times Evaluation/Test V. High Speed Steering Exercise II (a,b,d) IV (1-5) A. Chicanes 4 Barricades -6- 1. 4 sets each B. Chicanes 5 Barricades 1. 5 sets each Evaluation VI. Combined Skill Exercise A. Controlled Speed -- South Direction II (a,c,g) IV (1-5) 1. Cornering 2. Braking 3. Throttle control 4. Increase radius turns 5. Decrease radius turns B. Controlled Speed -- North Direction II (a,c,g) IV (1-5) 1. Cornering 2. Braking 3. Throttle control 4. Increase radius turns 5. Decrease radius turns 6. High speed braking a. Rear wheel cheat b. Front end sway VII. Extended High Speed Steering Exercise II (a,c,g) IV (1-5) A. Chicane 1. 4 Sets 2. ¼ @ 70 mph VIII. Hot Laps II (a,c,g) IV (1-5) A. South Direction on Oval 1. Cornering 2. Vehicle positioning 3. Braking 4. Speed 5. Throttle 6. Apex 7. Increase radius turn -7- 8. Decrease radius turn 9. 20 Minutes per student B. North Direction 1. Cornering 2. Vehicle positioning 3. Braking 4. Speed 5. Throttle 6. Apex 7. Increase radius turn 8. Decrease radius turn 9. 20 Minutes per student C. Extended Hot Laps 1. Track extends to straight section 2. Cornering 3. Vehicle positioning 4. Braking 5. Speed 6. Throttle 7. Apex 8. Increase radius turn 9. Decrease radius turn 10. 20 Minutes per student IX. Lead and Follow II (a,c,g) IV (1-5) A. 2 Vehicles, 2 Students 1. Simulate Code 3 run 2. 5 Minutes / switch lead 3. Use of track left to students X. City Grid II (a,b,c,d,f,g) IV (1-5) A. Cornering B. Braking C. Throttle control D. Vehicle positioning E. Vehicle spacing F. Speed judgment G. Intersections 1. Traffic issues/interference car -8- H. Weight transfer 1. Lateral /Longitudinal I. Steering XI. Pursuit A. Code 3 Driving II (a,b,c,d,f,g) IV (1-5) 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Laboratory Test Procedure for Fmvss 110T-01
    TP-110T-01 December 15, 2005 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURE FOR FMVSS 110 Tire Selection and Rims for Motor Vehicles With a GVWR of 4,536 Kilograms or Less (For Light Truck Type Vehicles Only) ENFORCEMENT Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance Room 6111, NVS-220 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20590 OVSC LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURE NO. 110T TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. PURPOSE AND APPLICATION................................................................... 1 2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS....................................................................... 2 3. SECURITY ................................................................................................... 3 4. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING............................................................................. 3 5. TEST SCHEDULING AND MONITORING ................................................... 3 6. TEST DATA DISPOSITION.......................................................................... 3 7. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP)....................................... 4 8. CALIBRATION OF TEST INSTRUMENTS................................................... 4 9. PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION........................................................ 6 10. DEFINITIONS............................................................................................... 6 11. PRETEST REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................... 8 12. COMPLIANCE TEST EXECUTION.............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Transit Connect Specs
    2020 Transit Connect Specs Use the menu to select and view information related to wheels, exterior colors and interior trim. Key product specifications include vehicle dimensions and capacities, detailed engine information, transmission gear ratios and more. 2020 Transit Connect Dimensions/ Weights/ Capacities Specs Gross Combination Weight Passenger Weight Accessory Reserve Capacity Rating (GCWR) (ARC) Calculation Passenger/ Cargo/ Fuel Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Capacity Base Curb Weight Gross Vehicle Weight Rating Payload Body Dimensions (GVWR) Tongue Weight Cargo Dimensions Maximum Payload Weight Rating Trailer Weight Gross Axle Weight Maximum Payload Weight Truck “Nominal Tonnage” Gross Axle Weight Rating Ratings (GAWR) Vehicle Class Ratings by Option Content Weight GVWR Gross Combination Weight (GCW) Option Weights Weight Distribution Passenger Dimensions Weight Ratings 2020 Transit Connect Body Dimensions Specs Dimensions/ Weights/ Capacities Inches (unless otherwise noted) Model Cargo Van SWB/LWB Passenger Wagon Description Overall Length 174.2/190.0 190.0 Wheelbase 104.8/120.6 120.6 Overall Width (with mirrors) 84.1/84.1 84.1 Overall Width (without mirrors) 72.2/72.2 72.2 Overall Height 72.0/72.0 71.6 Front Overhang 34.8/34.8 34.8 Rear Overhang 34.6/34.6 34.6 Front Track 61.4/61.4 61.4 Rear Track 61.7/61.7 61.7 Minimum Running Ground 5.4/5.6 5.7 Clearance Front Axle Clearance 7.0/7.1 7.0 Sliding Side Door Opening 44.4/44.4 37.6 Height(1) Sliding Side Door Opening 24.2/32.8 32.8 Width Rear Door Opening Height 47.3/45.5 45.4 Rear Door Opening Width 49.2/49.2 47.0 Loading Height at Rear Door 23.0/22.9 22.4 (curb) Turning Diameter (curb-to- 38.3/40.0 40.0 curb) (feet) (1) Wagon measured to 2nd-row seat in fold and dive position.
    [Show full text]
  • Owner's Manual
    OWNER’S MANUAL The Best Protection For Your Journey™ MADE IN THE Hitch Ball U.S.A. Not Included 90-00-0600 - 600 lb. max tongue weight / 6,000 lb. max trailer weight 90-00-1000 - 1,000 lb. max tongue weight / 10,000 lb. max trailer weight 90-00-1200 - 1,200 lb. max tongue weight / 12,000 lb. max trailer weight 90-00-1400 - 1,400 lb. max tongue weight / 14,000 lb. max trailer weight ** Your model # can be found on the stickers on either spring arm. Make a note of it here for future reference ** DEALERS: PLEASE PASS THIS MANUAL ON TO THE END USER AFTER HITCH INSTALLATION. EqualizerHitch.com READ ENTIRE MANUAL BEFORE STARTING INSTALLATION Table of Contents Page Parts Breakdown . .4-5 Important Safety Information . 6 Important Hitch Information . .7 Step 1: Getting Things Ready . .8 Step 2: Install the Hitch Ball. 9 Step 3: Attach Hitch Head to Shank . 10 Step 4: Sway Bracket Assembly . 12 Step 5: Spring Arm Setup . 15 Step 6: Weight Distribution Setup . 16 Step 7: Weight Distribution Adjustments . 18 Step 8: Trailer Pitch Adjustment. 21 Step 9: Final Tightening . 22 Step 10: Regular Maintenance . 23 Service Tech Check List . 24 Appendix A: Troubleshooting Guide. 25 Customer Support . 26 Appendix B: Weight Distribution Adjustments . 27 Warranty . 29 TOOLS NEEDED FOR INSTALLATION The following tools will allow you to install the hitch properly: 1-1/8” Box-end wrench (Shank Bolts) 1-1/8” Socket wrench (Shank Bolts) 3/4” Box-end or socket wrench (Link Plates and L-brackets) 5/8” Socket or box-end wrench (Angle Set Bolt) Measuring tape Pencil Torque wrench capable of 320 ft-lbs of torque.
    [Show full text]
  • Honda Odyssey Specifications
    Honda Odyssey Specifications Engineering DESCRIPTION LX EX SE EX-L TOURING TOURING ELITE Engine Type: V-6 • • • • • • Engine Block / Cylinder Head: Aluminum-Alloy • • • • • • Horsepower (SAE net): 248 @ 5700 rpm • • • • • • Torque (SAE net): 250 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm • • • • • • Displacement: 3471 cc • • • • • • Redline: 6300 rpm • • • • • • Bore and Stroke: 89 mm x 93 mm • • • • • • Compression Ratio: 10.5 : 1 • • • • • • Valve Train: 24-Valve SOHC i-VTEC® • • • • • • Multi-Point Fuel Injection • • • • • • Drive-by-Wire Throttle System • • • • • • Eco Assist™ System • • • • • • Variable Cylinder Management™ (VCM®) • • • • • • Active Control Engine Mount System (ACM) • • • • • • Active Noise Cancellation™ (ANC) • • • • • • Direct Ignition System with Immobilizer • • • • • • 100K +/- Miles No Scheduled Tune-Ups1 • • • • • • CARB Emissions Rating2 : ULEV-2 • • • • • • Transmissions DESCRIPTION LX EX SE EX-L TOURING TOURING ELITE 6-Speed Automatic Transmission • • • • • • 6-Speed Automatic Transmission GEAR : RATIO 1st : 3.359 2nd : 2.095 3rd : 1.485 4th : 1.065 5th : 0.754 6th : 0.556 Reverse : 2.269 Final Drive : 4.250 Body / Suspension / Chassis DESCRIPTION LX EX SE EX-L TOURING TOURING ELITE Unit-Body Construction • • • • • • MacPherson Strut Front Suspension • • • • • • Multi-Link Double Wishbone Rear Suspension • • • • • • Electric Power-Assisted Rack-and-Pinion Steering (EPS) • • • • • • Stabilizer Bar (Front): 25.4 mm • • • • • • Steering Wheel Turns, Lock-to-Lock: 3.5 • • • • • • Steering Ratio: 16.4 • • • • • • Turning Diameter, Curb-to-Curb:
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Forward Vehicle Dynamics
    2 Forward Vehicle Dynamics Straight motion of an ideal rigid vehicle is the subject of this chapter. We ignore air friction and examine the load variation under the tires to determine the vehicle’s limits of acceleration, road grade, and kinematic capabilities. 2.1 Parked Car on a Level Road When a car is parked on level pavement, the normal force, Fz, under each of the front and rear wheels, Fz1 , Fz2 ,are 1 a F = mg 2 (2.1) z1 2 l 1 a F = mg 1 (2.2) z2 2 l where, a1 is the distance of the car’s mass center, C,fromthefrontaxle, a2 is the distance of C from the rear axle, and l is the wheel base. l = a1 + a2 (2.3) z a2 a1 x C 2Fz2 mg 2Fz1 FIGURE 2.1. A parked car on level pavement. 40 2. Forward Vehicle Dynamics Proof. Consider a longitudinally symmetrical car as shown in Figure 2.1. It can be modeled as a two-axel vehicle. A symmetric two-axel vehicle is equivalent to a rigid beam having two supports. The vertical force under the front and rear wheels can be determined using planar static equilibrium equations. Fz =0 (2.4) XMy =0 (2.5) Applying the equilibrium equationsX 2Fz +2Fz mg =0 (2.6) 1 2 − 2Fz a1 +2Fz a2 =0 (2.7) − 1 2 provide the reaction forces under the front and rear tires. 1 a2 Fz1 = mg 2 a1 + a2 1 a = mg 2 (2.8) 2 l 1 a1 Fz2 = mg 2 a1 + a2 1 a = mg 1 (2.9) 2 l Example 39 Reaction forces under wheels.
    [Show full text]
  • Installation of Body & Special Equipment
    Body Builders Guide I Body Builders Guide General Motors Isuzu Commercial Truck, LLC (GMICT) and American Isuzu Motors Inc. Is striving to provide you with the most up- to-date and accurate information possible. If you have any suggestion to improve the Body Builder's Guide, please call GMICT Application Engineering. In the West Coast call 1-562-229-5314 and in the East Coast call 1-404-257-3013 Notice of Rights All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission. Notice of Liability All specifications contained in this Body Builders Guide are based on the latest product information available at the time of publication. The manufacturer reserves the right to discontinue or change at anytime without prior notice, any parts, material, colors, special equipment, specifications, designs and models. Made and printed in the USA. II Contents Introduction FMVSS EPA Requirements Weight Distribution Installation of Body & Special Equipment Glossary of Dimensions Clearances Weight Distribution Formulas Body Installations Recommended Weight Distribution Prohibited Attachment Areas Trailer Weight Subframe Mounting Performance Calculations Crew Cab Body/Frame Requirements Highway Limits Modification of the Frame Federal Bridge Formula Table Fluid Lines Electrical Wiring & Harnessing Commodity & Material Weights Maximum Allowable Current Approximate Weight of Commodites & Materials Exhaust System Fuel System Vehicle
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Vehicle Standard for Ambulances V.1.0 Edition
    TAT ION O D I F R E A M CC B A U L N A O N C N E O I S S E S R I V M I C M E O S C Ground Vehicle Standard for Ambulances v.1.0 Edition Established and Maintained by CAAS The Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services www.caas.org CAAS GVS v.1.0 Acknowledgements The following groups & individuals participated as the Steering Committee for the GVS v.1.0: PROJECT TEAM Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services (CAAS) Mark Meijer (Chair, CAAS) Mark Postma (Vice Chair, CAAS; GVS v.1.0 Project Co-Chair) Joe Penner Dale Berry (Alternate) Sarah McEntee, EMT-P (Executive Director) Marcie McGlynn (Staff) Association and Society Management International (ASMI) Ian Weston, MPP, QAS, EMT (GVS v.1.0 Project Manager) ORGANIZATIONAL STAKEHOLDER LIASIONS Ambulance Manufacturers Division (AMD) National Association of EMTs (NAEMT) Mark Van Arnam (GVS v.1.0 Project Co-Chair) Skip Kirkwood, MS, JD, EMT-P, EFO, CEMSO Alain Brunelle (Alternate) Don Lundy, BHS, NREMT-P (Alternate) American Ambulance Association (AAA) National Association of State EMS Officials (NASEMSO) Ron Thackery, JD Michael Berg, BS, NRP Mike Hall (Alternate) Dia Gainor (Alternate) American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) National EMS Management Association (NEMSMA) Sabina Braithwaite, MD, MPH, NREMT-P Aarron Reinert, BA, NREMT-P Troy Hagen, MBA (Alternate) Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) Rick Sherlock National Volunteer Fire Council (NVFC) Elena Sierra (Alternate) Ken Knipper Joe Maruca (Alternate) National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) Brent Myers, MD, MPH Transportation Research Board (TRB) Lynn White, MS (Alternate) Bernardo Kleiner GOVERNMENT AGENCY LIAISONS (NON-VOTING) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Procedure for Estimating Automobile Fuel Consumption on Congested Urban Roads
    NBSIR 74-595 A Procedure for Estimating Automobile Fuel Consumption on Congested Urban Roads David M. Levinsohn, James T. McQueen National Bureau of Standards Technical Analysis Division Urban Systems Program Area August 1974 Final Report Prepared for Urban Mass Transportation Administration Department of T ransportation Washington, D. C. 20591 \ NBSIR 74-595 A PROCEDURE FOR ESTIMATING AUTOMOBILE FUEL CONSUMPTION ON CONGESTED URBAN ROADS David M. Levinsohn, James T. McQueen National Bureau of Standards Technical Analysis Division Urban Systems Program Area August 1974 Final Report Prepared for Urban Mass Transportation Administration Department of Transportation Washington, D. C. 20591 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Frederick B. Oent. Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS. Richard W. Roberts. Director TABLE OF COOTENTS Page 1 . Introduction 1 1.1 Discussion o£ the Problem 1 1.2 Purpose 1 1.3 Organization 1 2. Review of Literature and Research in Progress 1 2.1 Literature 1 2.2 Research in Progress 3 3. Factors Which Affect Auto Fuel Consumption 4 3.1 Vehicle Attributes 4 3.2 Roadway Operating Conditions 5 4. A Procedure for Estimating Automobile Fuel Consumption 7 4.1 The Procedure 7 4.2 Aggregation of Variables 8 4.3 Summary of Procedure and Example 11 5. Recommended Approach to Data Collection 14 iii ABSTRACr Energy consumption is an important measure o£ the performance o£ a transportation system. To be able to accurately measure associated automobile fuel consumption will im- prove the evaluation of urban transportation alternatives. An estimation procedure is pro- posed that is designed to be particularly sensitive to automobile fuel consumption in con- gested, peak hour traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Vehicle Standard for Ambulances V2.0
    CAAS GVS V2.0 Ground Vehicle Standard for Ambulances V2.0 Established and Maintained by CAAS The Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services Effective Date: July 1, 2019 www.groundvehiclestandard.org www.caas.org 1 CAAS GVS V2.0 GROUND VEHICLE STANDARD V2.0 COMMITTEE PROJECT TEAM Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services (CAAS) Dale Berry (Chair, CAAS) Mark Van Arnam (GVS Administrator & GVS V2.0 Committee Co-Chair) Mark Postma (GVS V2.0 Committee Co-Chair) Joe Penner (Committee member) Sarah McEntee (Executive Director, CAAS) Marcie McGlynn (Staff, CAAS) ORGANIZATIONAL STAKEHOLDER LIAISONS (Voting) Ambulance Manufacturers Division (AMD) National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) Alain Brunelle Lynn White Paul Marshall (alternate) American Ambulance Association (AAA) National Association of EMTs (NAEMT) Ron Thackery Dennis Rowe Mike Hall (alternate) American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) National Association of State EMS Officials (NASEMSO) Christopher Tanski, MD Tom Mitchell Dia Gainor (alternate) Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) Rick Sherlock National EMS Management Association (NEMSMA) Elena Sierra (alternate) Hezedean Smith Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services (CAAS) Joe Penner GOVERNMENT AGENCY LIAISONS (Non-Voting) U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Raymon Mollers Jennifer Marshall National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Dave Bryson Kevin Horahan, JD, MPH, EMT-P National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) Jim Green John McDonald The Commission on the Accreditation of Ambulance Services 2 CAAS GVS V2.0 ABBREVIATIONS, TERMS & ACRONYMS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT AAA American Ambulance Association HHS U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT LAS VEGAS, NV AIR/LIGHT VEHICLE SVI #1074 Production Specification
    CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT LAS VEGAS, NV AIR/LIGHT VEHICLE SVI #1074 Production Specification Contract Administrator: Jackie Sipes Sales Administrator: Blare Schrock Clark County Fire Department Air/Light Vehicle, SVI #1074 INTERNET IN-PROCESS SITE The manufacturer shall post and maintain a website where the Clark County Fire Department will be able to view digital images of their apparatus as its being built. The digital images shall be posted once a week starting when the body begins production or when the cab/chassis arrives and shall continue until the final completion of unit. VEHICLE STABILITY SUPPLIED WITH CAB/CHASSIS The cab/chassis shall be equipped with a stability control system. The system shall have, at a minimum, a steering wheel position sensor, a vehicle yaw sensor, a lateral accelerometer and individual wheel brake controls. WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION When the fire apparatus is loaded to its estimated in-service weight, the front-to-rear weight distribution shall be within the limits set by the chassis manufacturer. The front axle loads shall not be less than the minimum axle loads specified by the chassis manufacturer under full load and all other loading conditions. LOAD DISTRIBUTION The apparatus manufacturer shall calculate the load distribution for the apparatus, and that load distribution plan shall be delivered with the fire apparatus. The manufacturer shall engineer the fire apparatus to comply with the gross axle weight ratings (GAWR), the overall gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR), and the chassis manufacturer’s load balance guidelines. The fire apparatus, when loaded to its estimated in service weight, shall have a side-to-side tire load variation of no more than 7 percent of the total tire load for that axle.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid SPECIFICATIONS
    2021 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid SPECIFICATIONS Specifications are based on the latest product information available at the time of publication. All dimensions are in inches (millimeters) unless otherwise noted. All dimensions measured at curb weight with standard tires and wheels. GENERAL INFORMATION Vehicle Type Multipurpose vehicle Assembly Plant Windsor, Ontario, Canada EPA Vehicle Class Multipurpose vehicle Introduction Date 2016 as a 2017 model BODY/CHASSIS Layout Transverse front engine, front-wheel drive Construction Steel unibody with hinged front doors; aluminum-skinned sliding left- and right-side doors — power available. Aluminum-skinned rear liftgate with gas props — power available ENGINE: 3.6-LITER PENTASTAR V-6 EHYBRID (ATKINSON CYCLE) Availability Standard Type and Description 60-degree dual overhead cam engine Displacement 220 cu. in. (3,605 cu. cm) Bore x Stroke 96 mm x 83 mm Valve System 24-valve, end pivot roller finger followers and continuous variable-valve timing on both intake and exhaust cams; chain-driven Fuel System Port-fuel injection (PFI) Construction High-pressure die-cast A380 aluminum block with iron liners and semi-permanent mold A319 aluminum heads Compression Ratio 12.5:1 Total System Power 260 hp (194 kW) Fuel Requirement Unleaded regular, 87 octane, or E0 to E15 2021 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid // SPECIFICATIONS http://media.fcanorthamerica.com // 1 Oil Capacity 5 quarts (4.7 liter) Coolant Capacity 7.2 quarts (6.8 liter) Emission Controls Integrated cast-aluminum header manifolds; positive crankcase ventilation;
    [Show full text]
  • The Brass Lamp the Brass Lamp
    December 2016 The Brass Lamp Studebaker: First in Muscle Cars? Glenn Arlt Historical Vehicle Association Blog October 2016 A conventional view of automo- when they redesigned the Styled by Raymond Loewy’s tive history remembers that the Thunderbird for 1958. And it team in 1952, the Starlight and muscle/pony car era pretty much was this “new” style of Thunder- Starliner started out as a couple began with the debut of GTO bird that begat the smaller and of concept cars. Going from the and Mustang, respectively, in less expensive Ford Mustang drawing board to the clay- 1964½. Not according to Hager- and its competitors, which be- model phase, the cars were ty Historian, Glenn Arlt, who gat cars like the Trans Am and considered so gorgeous that looks back a decade prior to the Camaro. they were ultimately given the evolution of Studebaker’s line go-ahead for full production in screaming “family sports cars.” After digging into the history of 1952 and debuted the follow- Starliner, Studebaker’s largely ing model year. The other day, I was rearranging unrecognized place in muscle a few 1/18 models I keep on my car history becomes even im- One look at the long hood, desk at the Hagerty Institute portant when you consider the short deck and low profile of and something caught my eye. automotive missing link that the Starliner, and even the cas- Two of the models—a 1977 really connects all these cars ual observer would agree, this black Trans Am and a 1953 Stu- together—another, ground- Studebaker classic satisfies the debaker Commander Starliner— breaking Studebaker known as modern definition of “pony car” were curiously similar.
    [Show full text]