Refining Paleoproterozoic Sedimentary Sequence Boundaries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Refining Paleoproterozoic Sedimentary Sequence Boundaries Refining Paleoproterozoic Sedimentary Sequence Boundaries in East-Central Minnesota, Carlton County: Implications for Source, Age, Correlations, and Tectonic Histories A thesis submitted to the Kent State University Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by Scott W. Scheiner December, 2012 Thesis written by Scott W. Scheiner B.S. Kent State University, 2009 M.S. Kent State University, 2012 Approved by ________________________________, Advisor Dr. Daniel K. Holm ________________________________, Chair, Department of Geology Dr. Daniel K. Holm ________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Raymond A. Craig ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES..............................................................................................................vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...............................................................................................vii SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................1 Chapter I. Introduction..................................................................................................3 Animikie Basin in Minnesota......................................................................5 Lake Superior Banded Iron Formations.......................................................9 Tectonic Model of the Penokean Orogeny................................................11 Southern Margin of Animikie Basin..........................................................14 II. New Developments....................................................................................17 Yavapai Magmatism..................................................................................17 Yavapai Metamorphic Signature...............................................................18 Yavapai Structures.....................................................................................20 Yavapai Sedimentation..............................................................................21 Field Description of Bedrock Geology: Southern Margin of Animikie Basin..........................................................................................................21 New Hypothesis.........................................................................................22 III. Field Sampling...........................................................................................25 Lithologic Variation Across Holst’s Line..................................................26 Preparation of Thin Sections......................................................................27 Thin Section Analysis................................................................................27 Geochemistry.............................................................................................30 Geochemical Analysis Techniques............................................................30 Geochemical Results..................................................................................31 Isotope Analysis.........................................................................................35 Preparation of Isotope Samples.................................................................38 Isotope Results...........................................................................................38 iii Discussion..................................................................................................41 IV. A New Interpretation.................................................................................45 A New Tectonic Model..............................................................................49 Implication for Inventory of Structures.....................................................51 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................53 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Paleoproterozoic supracrustal sequences in the Lake Superior region....................4 2. Stratigraphy of major iron ranges in Minnesota and Ontario..................................6 3. Simplified geologic map of east-central Minnesota................................................8 4. Aeromagnetic map of east-central Minnesota.......................................................10 5. Schematic cross-section of proposed Penokean orogeny tectonic evolution........13 6. Large fold structure at Thomson Dam within Carlton County, Minnesota...........16 7. Bedrock geology map of Carlton County, east-central Minnesota........................23 8. Schematic synopsis of tectono-sedimentary models along the southern margin of the Animikie Basin................................................................................................24 9. Photomicrographs of SS10-2a, SS10-4, SS10-5, and SS10-6...............................29 10. La/Sc vs. Ti.Zr ratio plot........................................................................................34 11. Sc/Cr vs. La/Y ratio plot........................................................................................34 12. Th vs. Zr plot..........................................................................................................36 13. Sc vs. V plot...........................................................................................................36 14. CaO vs K2O+Na2O plot.........................................................................................37 15. εNd(Age) vs. Age plot...........................................................................................43 16. Th/Sc vs εNd plot...................................................................................................44 17. Composite stratigraphic column of the Animikie Basin........................................46 18. Proposed tectono-sedimentary formation of the Animikie Basin..........................48 19. New tectonic interpretation....................................................................................50 v LIST OF TABLES Tables 1. Major and trace element geochemistry of samples from Carlton County, Minnesota.........................................................................................................32 2. Nd isotopic composition of Carlton County, Minnesota samples...................40 vi Acknowledgements I owe many thanks to Daniel Holm for his guidance and dedication through all stages of this project. I greatly appreciate Tathagata Dasgupta’s guidance on elemental and isotopic analysis, and for connecting me with Syracuse University where my samples were analyzed. I would like to thank Terry Boerboom, David Hacker, and Donald Palmer for their help in the review process. I appreciate the help and support I received from everyone in the KSU Geology Department. I cannot thank my family and friends enough for the love, support, and encouragement they provided during this process. I would especially like to thank my loving wife, Aubrey, for her everlasting patience and support. Also, to my parents, Ed and Lisa, for their unwavering support in everything I have undertaken. Funding for this research was provided by: Kent State University Department of Geology (School of Hard Rocks Mineral Resources Award), and The Institute of Lake Superior Geology Student Research Grant. vii Summary The Animikie Basin in north-eastern Minnesota is usually interpreted as a Penokean (1875-1835 Ma) foredeep deposit consisting mainly of 2 to 5 km thick turbidite sequences underlain by banded iron formations and quartzite conglomerates, all deposited in a foreland basin north of the accreted Penokean arc terrain. Much of the Animikie basin sequence is only very weakly metamorphosed and only mildly deformed. However, along its southern margin in Carlton County, east-central Minnesota, the sedimentary sequence is strongly deformed into what are interpreted to be refolded nappes. The twice deformed sequence occurs south of a similar sedimentary sequence that has undergone a single deformation. The contact between these sequences, although nowhere exposed, was interpreted by Holst (1985) as a Penokean thrust fault and all of the deformation assumed to be Penokean in age. This contact is commonly referred to at Holst’s Line. A wealth of new data collected over the last ~15 years document Yavapai-age magmatism, metamorphism, sedimentation and deformation overprinting the Penokean orogen. Metamorphic ages that that post-date the Penokean orogeny and detrital zircon ages indicate that some of the Paleoproterozoic sedimentary rocks may be younger than previously thought. Based on this new evidence, I propose Holst’s Line to represent an unconformity separating sedimentary foredeep packages of different ages and test this hypothesis using geochemical and Sm/Nd isotopic data. 1 2 Geochemical analyses were obtained on 10 samples divided into two groups based upon location north or south of Holst’s Line. Relative proportions of major elements varied little within and across these groups. Trace element ratio plots of La/Sc vs Ti/Zr, Sc/Cr vs La/Y, Th vs Zr and Sc vs V were created with the hope of distinguishing between different tectonic settings for the source of the sediments. The results show a concentrated grouping of data from the southern samples and a much larger spread from northern samples, suggesting a more variable source for the northern
Recommended publications
  • Tectonic Imbrication and Foredeep Development in the Penokean
    Tectonic Imbrication and Foredeep Development in the Penokean Orogen, East-Central Minnesota An Interpretation Based on Regional Geophysics and the Results of Test-Drilling The Penokean Orogeny in Minnesota and Upper Michigan A Comparison of Structural Geology U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1904-C, D AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ Books of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Natural History
    Timeline of natural history This timeline of natural history summarizes significant geological and Life timeline Ice Ages biological events from the formation of the 0 — Primates Quater nary Flowers ←Earliest apes Earth to the arrival of modern humans. P Birds h Mammals – Plants Dinosaurs Times are listed in millions of years, or Karo o a n ← Andean Tetrapoda megaanni (Ma). -50 0 — e Arthropods Molluscs r ←Cambrian explosion o ← Cryoge nian Ediacara biota – z ←Earliest animals o ←Earliest plants i Multicellular -1000 — c Contents life ←Sexual reproduction Dating of the Geologic record – P r The earliest Solar System -1500 — o t Precambrian Supereon – e r Eukaryotes Hadean Eon o -2000 — z o Archean Eon i Huron ian – c Eoarchean Era ←Oxygen crisis Paleoarchean Era -2500 — ←Atmospheric oxygen Mesoarchean Era – Photosynthesis Neoarchean Era Pong ola Proterozoic Eon -3000 — A r Paleoproterozoic Era c – h Siderian Period e a Rhyacian Period -3500 — n ←Earliest oxygen Orosirian Period Single-celled – life Statherian Period -4000 — ←Earliest life Mesoproterozoic Era H Calymmian Period a water – d e Ectasian Period a ←Earliest water Stenian Period -4500 — n ←Earth (−4540) (million years ago) Clickable Neoproterozoic Era ( Tonian Period Cryogenian Period Ediacaran Period Phanerozoic Eon Paleozoic Era Cambrian Period Ordovician Period Silurian Period Devonian Period Carboniferous Period Permian Period Mesozoic Era Triassic Period Jurassic Period Cretaceous Period Cenozoic Era Paleogene Period Neogene Period Quaternary Period Etymology of period names References See also External links Dating of the Geologic record The Geologic record is the strata (layers) of rock in the planet's crust and the science of geology is much concerned with the age and origin of all rocks to determine the history and formation of Earth and to understand the forces that have acted upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Exploring the Texture of Ocean-Atmosphere Redox Evolution on the Early Earth Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9v96g1j5 Author Reinhard, Christopher Thomas Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Exploring the Texture of Ocean-Atmosphere Redox Evolution on the Early Earth A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geological Sciences by Christopher Thomas Reinhard September 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Timothy W. Lyons, Chairperson Dr. Gordon D. Love Dr. Nigel C. Hughes ! Copyright by Christopher Thomas Reinhard 2012 ! ! The Dissertation of Christopher Thomas Reinhard is approved: ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ! ! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It goes without saying (but I’ll say it anyway…) that things like this are never done in a vacuum. Not that I’ve invented cold fusion here, but it was quite a bit of work nonetheless and to say that my zest for the enterprise waned at times would be to put it euphemistically. As it happens, though, I’ve been fortunate enough to be surrounded these last years by an incredible group of people. To those that I consider scientific and professional mentors that have kept me interested, grounded, and challenged – most notably Tim Lyons, Rob Raiswell, Gordon Love, and Nigel Hughes – thank you for all that you do. I also owe Nigel and Mary Droser a particular debt of graditude for letting me flounder a bit my first year at UCR, being understanding and supportive, and encouraging me to start down the road to where I’ve ended up (for better or worse).
    [Show full text]
  • Detrital Zircon Provenance and Lithofacies Associations Of
    geosciences Article Detrital Zircon Provenance and Lithofacies Associations of Montmorillonitic Sands in the Maastrichtian Ripley Formation: Implications for Mississippi Embayment Paleodrainage Patterns and Paleogeography Jennifer N. Gifford 1,*, Elizabeth J. Vitale 1, Brian F. Platt 1 , David H. Malone 2 and Inoka H. Widanagamage 1 1 Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA; [email protected] (E.J.V.); [email protected] (B.F.P.); [email protected] (I.H.W.) 2 Department of Geography, Geology, and the Environment, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: jngiff[email protected]; Tel.: +1-(662)-915-2079 Received: 17 January 2020; Accepted: 15 February 2020; Published: 22 February 2020 Abstract: We provide new detrital zircon evidence to support a Maastrichtian age for the establishment of the present-day Mississippi River drainage system. Fieldwork conducted in Pontotoc County,Mississippi, targeted two sites containing montmorillonitic sand in the Maastrichtian Ripley Formation. U-Pb detrital zircon (DZ) ages from these sands (n = 649) ranged from Mesoarchean (~2870 Ma) to Pennsylvanian (~305 Ma) and contained ~91% Appalachian-derived grains, including Appalachian–Ouachita, Gondwanan Terranes, and Grenville source terranes. Other minor source regions include the Mid-Continent Granite–Rhyolite Province, Yavapai–Mazatzal, Trans-Hudson/Penokean, and Superior. This indicates that sediment sourced from the Appalachian Foreland Basin (with very minor input from a northern or northwestern source) was being routed through the Mississippi Embayment (MSE) in the Maastrichtian. We recognize six lithofacies in the field areas interpreted as barrier island to shelf environments. Statistically significant differences between DZ populations and clay mineralogy from both sites indicate that two distinct fluvial systems emptied into a shared back-barrier setting, which experienced volcanic ash input.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Middle Precambrian Rove Formation in Northeastern Minnesota
    MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 5 P -7 Special Publication Series The Geology of the Middle Precambrian Rove Formation in northeastern Minnesota G. B. Morey UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS • 1969 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE GEOLOGY OF THE MIDDLE PRECAMBRIAN ROVE FORMATION IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA by G. B. Morey CONTENTS Page Abstract ........................................... 1 Introduction. 3 Location and scope of study. 3 Acknowledgements .. 3 Regional geology . 5 Structural geology . 8 Rock nomenclature . 8 Stratigraphy . .. 11 Introduction . .. 11 Nomenclature and correlation. .. 11 Type section . .. 11 Thickness . .. .. 14 Lower argillite unit. .. 16 Definition, distribution, and thickness. .. 16 Lithologic character . .. 16 Limestones. .. 17 Concretions. .. 17 Transition unit . .. 17 Definition, distribution, and thickness. .. 17 Lithologic character . .. 19 Thin-bedded graywacke unit . .. 19 Definition, distribution, and thickness. .. 19 Lithologic character. .. 20 Concretions ... .. 20 Sedimentary structures. .. 22 Internal bedding structures. .. 22 Structureless bedding . .. 23 Laminated bedding . .. 23 Graded bedding. .. 23 Cross-bedding . .. 25 Convolute bedding. .. 26 Internal bedding sequences . .. 26 Post-deposition soft sediment deformation structures. .. 27 Bed pull-aparts . .. 27 Clastic dikes . .. 27 Load pockets .. .. 28 Flame structures . .. 28 Overfolds . .. 28 Microfaults. .. 28 Ripple marks .................................. 28 Sole marks . .. 28 Groove casts . .. 30 Flute casts .
    [Show full text]
  • Joe Curran Microfossils and the Depositional Environment of The
    Joe Curran Microfossils and the Depositional Environment of the Gunflint Iron Formation A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Geology) at GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE 2012 Abstract The Gunflint Iron Formation was deposited during the mid-Paleoproterozoic, shortly after the early Paleoproterozoic Great Oxygenation Event(GOE), when the atmosphere and oceans became oxygenated for the first time. The lowermost portions of the Gunflint Iron Formation contain black, early diagenetic chert with locally abundant microfossils. Reconstructing the life habits and ecology of the microfossil assemblages allows us to better understand the shallow water sedimantary conditions during the post GOE interval. Eosphaera and Kakabekia are two distinctive genera that occur in the Gunflint, but they likely had different habitats. Kakabekia has a morphology similar to iron metabolizing bacteria that live today in anoxic soil microhabitats. In the Gunflint, Kakabekia occurs in association with filamehts and coccoidal microfossils that likely lived in or near stromatolites on the sea floor. The association with this likely iron bacteria and a benthic microbial community suggests that most of the Gunflint microflora was benthic and possibly living in ferruginous, anoxic conditions. In contrast, Eosphaera fossils are rare and not strongly associated with the main community components. Eosphaera’s morphological similarity with the modern alga Volvox suggests that Eosphaera may also have hada photosynthetic metabolism. Eosphaera is plausibly interpreted as an oxygenic photosyhthesizer that lived in an oxic zone above the seafloor. If correct, this interpretation suggests close spatial proximity of oxic and anoxic environments in the Paleoproterozoic iron formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Iron Ore Sustainable Supply
    Minnesota Iron Ore Sustainable Supply by Jim Sellner, PE, PG Manager of Engineering & Development Division of Lands & Minerals Department of Natural Resources Laurentian Vision Partnership, Iron Range Resources Rehabilitation, Iron Board Chisholm, MN January 28, 2015 Division of Lands and Minerals Promoting and Regulating Mining in Minnesota Topics • Mineral revenue and leasing • Iron Ore & Manganese on the Cuyuna Range There are 2 basic industries: Agriculture & Mining – everything else is value added John Engesser, P.E. Chemical Engineer Former Assistant Director Lands & Minerals Hibbing 3 Minnesota State Statute 93.001 Policy for promoting Mineral Development It is the policy of the state to provide for the diversification of the state’s mineral economy through long-term support of mineral exploration, evaluation, environmental research, development, production, and commercialization. Minnesota State Statute127A.31 Goal of the permanent School Fund. The DNR Administers 8.5 million acres of land of which 2.5 million is School Trust. The legislature intends that it is the goal of the permanent school fund to secure the maximum long-term economic return from the school trust lands consistent with the fiduciary responsibilities imposed by the trust relationship established in the Minnesota Constitution, with sound natural resource conservation and management principles, and with other specific policy provided in state law. Minnesota State Constitution – Article 11 The permanent school fund of the state consists of (a) the proceeds of lands granted by the United States for the use of schools within each township,… No portion of these lands shall be sold otherwise than at public sale, and in the manner provided by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Strike on the Mesabi, 1907
    STRIKE on the MESABI—1907 NEIL BETTEN WHEN NEWS CAME in July, 1907, that miners along the length of the Mesabi Range had walked off the job, the state of Minnesota braced itself for all-out labor war. It was the first widespread, organized strike to occur in the iron district, and it was en­ gineered by the Western Federation of Miners, an or­ ganization associated in the public mind with names like Coeur d'Alene, Leadville, and Cripple Creek — each the scene of fierce and bloody labor struggles. In the fifteen years since 1892 the Mesabi Range had been transformed from a wilderness of wooded hills into a mining complex that produced nearly half of the nation's iron ore. The soft red hematite lying in pockets near the surface could be scooped up from A typical iron range great open pits. Into these, and into underground mine worker of the mines as well, had poured whole armies of unskilled early twentieth century workers. Youth, health, and a strong back were all that was called for — not even the language was necessary — and before long the first wave of miners, made up of Mr. Betten wrote the present article while working for his doctorate in history at the University of Minnesota. He re­ cently joined the facidty of the University of Indiana at Gary. 340 MINNESOTA History Americans, Cornishmen, French Canadians, AFL. The preamble to the WFM constitu­ Irish, Scandinavians, and some Finns, was tion declared that "the class struggle will replaced by a throng of more recent immi­ continue until the producer is recognized as grants.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanobacterial Evolution During the Precambrian
    International Journal of Astrobiology 15 (3): 187–204 (2016) doi:10.1017/S1473550415000579 © Cambridge University Press 2016 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Cyanobacterial evolution during the Precambrian Bettina E. Schirrmeister1, Patricia Sanchez-Baracaldo2 and David Wacey1,3 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK e-mail: [email protected] 2School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK 3Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, and ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia Abstract: Life on Earth has existed for at least 3.5 billion years. Yet, relatively little is known of its evolution during the first two billion years, due to the scarceness and generally poor preservation of fossilized biological material. Cyanobacteria, formerly known as blue green algae were among the first crown Eubacteria to evolve and for more than 2.5 billion years they have strongly influenced Earth’s biosphere. Being the only organism where oxygenic photosynthesis has originated, they have oxygenated Earth’s atmosphere and hydrosphere, triggered the evolution of plants –being ancestral to chloroplasts– and enabled the evolution of complex life based on aerobic respiration. Having such a strong impact on early life, one might expect that the evolutionary success of this group may also have triggered further biosphere changes during early Earth history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Penokean Orogeny in the Lake Superior Region Klaus J
    Precambrian Research 157 (2007) 4–25 The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region Klaus J. Schulz ∗, William F. Cannon U.S. Geological Survey, 954 National Center, Reston, VA 20192, USA Received 16 March 2006; received in revised form 1 September 2006; accepted 5 February 2007 Abstract The Penokean orogeny began at about 1880 Ma when an oceanic arc, now the Pembine–Wausau terrane, collided with the southern margin of the Archean Superior craton marking the end of a period of south-directed subduction. The docking of the buoyant craton to the arc resulted in a subduction jump to the south and development of back-arc extension both in the initial arc and adjacent craton margin to the north. A belt of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits formed in the extending back-arc rift within the arc. Synchronous extension and subsidence of the Superior craton resulted in a broad shallow sea characterized by volcanic grabens (Menominee Group in northern Michigan). The classic Lake Superior banded iron-formations, including those in the Marquette, Gogebic, Mesabi and Gunflint Iron Ranges, formed in that sea. The newly established subduction zone caused continued arc volcanism until about 1850 Ma when a fragment of Archean crust, now the basement of the Marshfield terrane, arrived at the subduction zone. The convergence of Archean blocks of the Superior and Marshfield cratons resulted in the major contractional phase of the Penokean orogeny. Rocks of the Pembine–Wausau arc were thrust northward onto the Superior craton causing subsidence of a foreland basin in which sedimentation began at about 1850 Ma in the south (Baraga Group rocks) and 1835 Ma in the north (Rove and Virginia Formations).
    [Show full text]
  • Isotopic and Chemical Characterization of Water from Mine Pits and Wells on the Mesabi Iron Range, Northeastern Minnesota, As a Tool for Drinking Water Protection
    Isotopic and Chemical Characterization of Water From Mine Pits and Wells on the Mesabi Iron Range, Northeastern Minnesota, as a Tool for Drinking Water Protection James F. Walsh, Minnesota Department of Health Abstract The Biwabik Iron Formation is both a world-class source of iron ore and an important aquifer for the residents of the Mesabi Iron Range in northeastern Minnesota. Numerous public water supply wells draw from this aquifer, and several communities pump directly from abandoned mine pits for their water supply. It is important that the groundwater flow characteristics of this aquifer be determined so that drinking water supplies can be protected in a technically defensible manner. The iron formation is early Proterozoic in age and consists primarily of fine-grained silica and iron minerals that were deposited as chemical sediments in a marine environment. The unit has little primary porosity. Groundwater flow through the aquifer is controlled predominantly by secondary features such as folds, high- angle faults, joints, and man-made mining structures. Efforts at delineating source water protection areas on the Mesabi Range have been complicated by the extremely heterogeneous and anisotropic nature of porosity in the Biwabik Iron Formation aquifer. In the absence of reliable groundwater flow models for this type of setting, isotopic and chemical studies have been emphasized, in addition to hydrogeologic mapping. Conservative environmental tracers such as chloride and the stable isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen have proved useful for 1) identifying wells that are receiving recharge from mine pits, 2) characterizing the tracer signature of those mine pits that may represent recharge areas for nearby public supply wells, and 3) quantifying the significance of these recharge areas for the purpose of targeting source water protection efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Milford Mine National Register Historic District, Crow Wing County, Minnesota
    MILFORD MINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT, CROW WING COUNTY, MINNESOTA CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT Site History, Existing Conditions, Analysis and Evaluation Prepared by Two Pines Resource Group, LLC and 10,000 Lakes Archaeology, Inc. March 2015 PUBLIC VERSION MILFORD MINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT, CROW WING COUNTY, MINNESOTA CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT Site History, Existing Conditions, Analysis and Evaluation Prepared for Crow Wing County Land Services 322 Laurel Street, Suite 12 Brainerd, MN 56401 Prepared by Michelle M. Terrell, Ph.D., RPA Two Pines Resource Group, LLC 17711 260th Street Shafer, MN 55074 Amanda Gronhovd, M.S., RPA 10,000 Lakes Archaeology, Inc. 220 9th Avenue South South St. Paul, MN 55075 THIS PROJECT WAS FUNDED IN PART BY THE ARTS AND CULTURAL HERITAGE FUND March 2015 PUBLIC VERSION MILFORD MINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT This publication was made possible in part by the people of Minnesota through a grant funded by an appropriation to the Minnesota Historical Society from the Minnesota Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund. Any views, findings, opinions, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Historical Society, or the Minnesota Historic Resources Advisory Committee. MILFORD MINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT MILFORD MINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT They came mostly to fulfill dreams of a better life and were willing to work hard and long to achieve that – if not for themselves, at least for their children… ~ ~ ~ Among the miners there developed a closeness and camaraderie that transcended the differences in language, ethnic background, and religion.
    [Show full text]