Resurrection Robert David Jinkins Iowa State University
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Zeller Int All 6P V2.Indd 1 11/4/16 12:23 PM the FIGURATIVE ARTIST’S HANDBOOK
zeller_int_all_6p_v2.indd 1 11/4/16 12:23 PM THE FIGURATIVE ARTIST’S HANDBOOK A CONTEMPORARY GUIDE TO FIGURE DRAWING, PAINTING, AND COMPOSITION ROBERT ZELLER FOREWORD BY PETER TRIPPI AFTERWORD BY KURT KAUPER MONACELLI STUDIO zeller_int_all_6p_v2.indd 2-3 11/4/16 12:23 PM Copyright © 2016 ROBERT ZELLER and THE MONACELLI PRESS Illustrations copyright © 2016 ROBERT ZELLER unless otherwise noted Text copyright © 2016 ROBERT ZELLER Published in the United States by MONACELLI STUDIO, an imprint of THE MONACELLI PRESS All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Zeller, Robert, 1966– author. Title: The figurative artist’s handbook : a contemporary guide to figure drawing, painting, and composition / Robert Zeller. Description: First edition. | New York, New York : Monacelli Studio, 2016. Identifiers: LCCN 2016007845 | ISBN 9781580934527 (hardback) Subjects: LCSH: Figurative drawing. | Figurative painting. | Human figure in art. | Composition (Art) | BISAC: ART / Techniques / Life Drawing. | ART / Techniques / Drawing. | ART / Subjects & Themes / Human Figure. Classification: LCC NC765 .Z43 2016 | DDC 743.4--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016007845 ISBN 978-1-58093-452-7 Printed in China Design by JENNIFER K. BEAL DAVIS Cover design by JENNIFER K. BEAL DAVIS Cover illustrations by ROBERT ZELLER Illustration credits appear on page 300. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is dedicated to my daughter, Emalyn. First Edition This book was inspired by Kenneth Clark's The Nude and Andrew Loomis's Figure Drawing for All It's Worth. MONACELLI STUDIO This book would not have been possible without the help of some important peo- THE MONACELLI PRESS 236 West 27th Street ple. -
Hans Memling's Scenes from the Advent and Triumph of Christ And
Volume 5, Issue 1 (Winter 2013) Hans Memling’s Scenes from the Advent and Triumph of Christ and the Discourse of Revelation Sally Whitman Coleman Recommended Citation: Sally Whitman Coleman, “Hans Memling’s Scenes from the Advent and Triumph of Christ and the Discourse of Revelation,” JHNA 5:1 (Winter 2013), DOI: 10.5092/jhna.2013.5.1.1 Available at https://jhna.org/articles/hans-memlings-scenes-from-the-advent-and-triumph-of- christ-discourse-of-revelation/ Published by Historians of Netherlandish Art: https://hnanews.org/ Republication Guidelines: https://jhna.org/republication-guidelines/ Notes: This PDF is provided for reference purposes only and may not contain all the functionality or features of the original, online publication. This is a revised PDF that may contain different page numbers from the previous version. Use electronic searching to locate passages. This PDF provides paragraph numbers as well as page numbers for citation purposes. ISSN: 1949-9833 JHNA 5:1 (Winter 2013) 1 HANS MEMLING’S SCENES FROM THE ADVENT AND TRIUMPH OF CHRIST AND THE DISCOURSE OF REVELATION Sally Whitman Coleman Hans Memling’s Scenes from the Advent and Triumph of Christ (ca. 1480, Alte Pinakothek, Munich) has one of the most complex narrative structures found in painting from the fifteenth century. It is also one of the earliest panoramic landscape paintings in existence. This Simultanbild has perplexed art historians for many years. The key to understanding Memling’s narrative structure is a consideration of the audience that experienced the painting four different times over the course of a year while participating in the major Church festivals. -
Chapter 1. in Search of Memling in Rogier's Workshop
CHAPTER 1. IN SEARCH OF MEMLING IN ROGIER’S WORKSHOP Scholars have long assumed that Memling trained with Rogier van der Weyden in Brussels,1 although no documents place him in Rogier’s workshop. Yet several sixteenth-century sources link the two artists, and Memling’s works refl ect a knowledge of many of Rogier’s fi gure types, compositions, and iconographical motifs. Such resemblances do not prove that Memling was Rogier’s apprentice, however, for Rogier was quoted extensively well into the sixteenth century by a variety of artists who did not train with him. In fact, Memling’s paintings are far from cop- ies of their Rogierian prototypes, belying the traditional argument that he saw them in Rogier’s workshop. Although drawings of these paintings remained in Rogier’s workshop long after his death, the paintings themselves left Brussels well before the period of Memling’s presumed apprenticeship with Rogier from 1459 or 1460 until Rogier’s death in 1464.2 Writers have often suggested that Memling participated in some of Rogier’s paintings, al- though no evidence of his hand has been found in the technical examinations of paintings in the Rogier group.3 One might argue that his style would naturally be obscured in these works because assistants were trained to work in the style of the master.4 Yet other styles have been revealed in the underdrawing of a number of paintings of the Rogier group; this is especially true of the Beaune and Columba Altarpieces (pl. 3 and fi g. 9), the two works with which paintings by Memling are so often associated.5 Molly Faries and Maryan Ainsworth have demonstrated that some of Memling’s early works contain brush underdrawings in a style remarkably close to that of the underdrawings in paint- ings of the Rogier group, and they have argued that Memling must have learned this technique in Rogier’s workshop.6 Although these arguments are convincing, they do not establish when and in what capacity Memling entered Rogier’s workshop or how long he remained there. -
William Holman Hunt's Portrait of Henry Wentworth Monk
Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2017 William Holman Hunt’s Portrait of Henry Wentworth Monk Jennie Mae Runnels Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4920 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. William Holman Hunt’s Portrait of Henry Wentworth Monk A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History at Virginia Commonwealth University. Jennie Runnels Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Art History MA Thesis Spring 2017 Director: Catherine Roach Assistant Professor Department of Art History Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia April 2017 Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Chapter 1 Holman Hunt and Henry Monk: A Chance Meeting Chapter 2 Jan van Eyck: Rediscovery and Celebrity Chapter 3 Signs, Symbols and Text Conclusion List of Images Selected Bibliography Acknowledgements In writing this thesis I have benefitted from numerous individuals who have been generous with their time and encouragement. I owe a particular debt to Dr. Catherine Roach who was the thesis director for this project and truly a guiding force. In addition, I am grateful to Dr. Eric Garberson and Dr. Kathleen Chapman who served on the panel as readers and provided valuable criticism, and Dr. Carolyn Phinizy for her insight and patience. -
The Subject, Sitters, and Significance of the Arnolfini Marriage Portrait
Venezia Arti [online] ISSN 2385-2720 Vol. 26 – Dicembre 2017 [print] ISSN 0394-4298 Why Was Jan van Eyck here? The Subject, Sitters, and Significance of The Arnolfini Marriage Portrait Benjamin Binstock (Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, New York City, USA) Abstract Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini Marriage Portrait of 1434 still poses fundamental questions. An overlooked account explained the groom’s left hand holding his bride’s right hand as a secular, legal morganatic marriage with a bride of lower social rank and wealth. That would explain Van Eyck’s presence as witness in the mirror and through his inscription, and corresponds to the recent identification of the bride and groom as Giovanni di Arrigo Arnolfini and his previously unknown first wife Helene of unknown last name. Van Eyck’s scene can be called the first modern painting, as the earliest autonomous, illusionistic representation of secular reality, provided with the earliest artist’s signature of the modern type, framing his scene as perceived and represented by a particular individual. That is why Jan van Eyck was here. Summary 1 What is being disguised: religious symbolism or secular art? – 2 A morganatic, left-handed marriage. – 3 The sitters: Giovanni di Arrigo Arnolfini and his first wife Helene? – 4 Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait as the first modern painting. – 5 Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait within his oeuvre and tradition. – 6 Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait and art historical method. Keywords Jan van Eyck. Signature. Arnolfini. Morganatic Marriage. Modern painting. For Marek Wieczorek What is the hardest of all? What you think is the easiest. -
Paradisi Porte Hans Memling's Angelic Concert
Paradisi Porte Hans Memling's Angelic Concert Tiburtina Ensemble · Barbora Kabátková Oltremontano Antwerpen Wim Becu Paradisi Porte Hans Memling's Angelic Concert Friendly supported by the Flemish Community Co-production with AMUZ, KMSKA, CmB Tiburtina Ensemble Barbora Kabátková Recorded at AMUZ, Antwerpen (Belgium), on 8-10 December 2020 Oltremontano Antwerpen Recording producer: Jo Cops Executive producer: Wim Becu (Oltremontano), Michael Sawall (note 1 music gmbh) Wim Becu Cover picture: “God the Father with singing and music making angels” by Hans Memling. Collection Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten, Antwerpen Belgium Layout & booklet editor: Joachim Berenbold Translations: Joachim Berenbold (Deutsch), Pierre Elie Mamou (français), Anna Moens (Nederlands) Photos (Cover, booklet: cover, p 9, 13, 17): Rik Klein Gotink Artist photo (p 21): Miel Pieters CD made in The Netherlands + © 2021 note 1 music gmbh 1 PROSA Ave Maria gracia plena Graduale Brugge, 1506 4:41 vocal ensemble, harp, psaltery 2 Fuga duo[rum] temp[orum] GUILLAUME DUFAY 1397-1474 2:18 vocal ensemble, claretas (Gloria ad modum tubae – Trent Ms 90) 3 HYMNUS Proles de caelo set by C. Vicens after GUILLAUME DUFAY 2:38 organetto, psaltery, harp [ALK] 4 INTROITUS In excelso throno Graduale Brugge, 1506 1:59 Tiburtina Ensemble solo voice [KB], psaltery Barbora Kabátková, Ivana Bilej Brouková, 5 BASSE DANSE Paradisi porte set by Andrew Lawrence-King 1:02 Hana Blažíková [solo in 8], Daniela Čermáková, harp [ALK] Anna Chadimová Havlíková, Kamila Mazalová chant 6 SEQUENTIA Alma -
Between Status and Spiritual Salvation: New Data on the Portinari Triptych and the Circumstances of Its Commission by Susanne F
Between status and spiritual salvation: New data on the Portinari triptych and the circumstances of its commission by Susanne Franke Fig. 1 When Tommaso di Folco Portinari renewed the contract for the management of the branch of the Medici Bank in Bruges on 14th October 1469, he was still unmarried and almost 40 years old with many years already behind him in the service of the Medici in Flanders.1 His efforts, however, to be at the forefront of the Florentine traders in Bruges and at the same time be the first representative of the Medici there was not just due to his ambitious pursuit of goals, as shown with the elimination of his competitor, Angelo Tani, or the At this point, I would like to thank the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for a travel grant in spring 2006 which enabled me to do research in the Bruges Archives. I would also like to express my thanks to Maurice Vandermaesen (Rijksarchief Brugge) and Noël Geirnaert (Stadsarchief Brugge) for their kind support as well as Laetitia Cnockaert (Université Libre de Bruxelles) and Thomas Woelki (Humboldt University of Berlin) whose immediate willingness to help and accurate work made the transcribed passages in the Appendix 1 possible. Finally, thanks to Ian Rooke who translated this article from the German. 1Tommaso Portinari (1428-1501) worked already at the age of 13 as assistant in the Bruges branch of the Medici bank. He was first instructed by his cousin Bernardo di Giovanni d’Adoardo, who directed the branch until 1448 and from 1455 by Angelo Tani. -
EARLY NETHERLANDISH PAINTING Part One
EARLY NETHERLANDISH PAINTING part one Early Netherlandish painting is the work of artists, sometimes known as the Flemish Primitives, active in the Burgundian and Habsburg Netherlands during the 15th- and 16th-century Northern Renaissance, especially in the flourishing cities of Bruges, Ghent, Mechelen, Leuven, Tounai and Brussels, all in present-day Belgium. The period begins approximately with Robert Campin and Jan van Eyck in the 1420s and lasts at least until the death of Gerard David in 1523, although many scholars extend it to the start of the Dutch Revolt in 1566 or 1568. Early Netherlandish painting coincides with the Early and High Italian Renaissance but the early period (until about 1500) is seen as an independent artistic evolution, separate from the Renaissance humanism that characterised developments in Italy; although beginning in the 1490s as increasing numbers of Netherlandish and other Northern painters traveled to Italy, Renaissance ideals and painting styles were incorporated into northern painting. As a result, Early Netherlandish painters are often categorised as belonging to both the Northern Renaissance and the Late or International Gothic. Robert Campin (c. 1375 – 1444), now usually identified with the Master of Flémalle (earlier the Master of the Merode Triptych), was the first great master of Flemish and Early Netherlandish painting. Campin's identity and the attribution of the paintings in both the "Campin" and "Master of Flémalle" groupings have been a matter of controversy for decades. Campin was highly successful during his lifetime, and thus his activities are relatively well documented, but he did not sign or date his works, and none can be confidently connected with him. -
The Secrets of Pangaea Paintings by James Waller
THE SECRETS OF PANGAEA PAINTINGS BY JAMES WALLER THE SECRETS OF PANGAEA PAINTINGS BY JAMES WALLER THE LOFT GALLERY CLONAKILTY 5 JULY - 4 AUGUST 2018 ORIGIN AND MYTH The Secrets of Pangaea is essentially an exploration of the figure in the landscape and marks James Waller’s first foray into large-scale narrative oil painting, a journey inspired, in large part by the Norwegian master Odd Nerdrum, whom he stud- ied with in August and September 2017. The series revolves around two major compositions, The Children of Lir and The Secrets of Pangaea, and includes smaller works created whilst studying in Norway. The starting points for the major compositions are found in Greek and Irish mythology and include figures in states of both dramatic tension and Arcadian repose. The Secrets of Pangaea recalls the Tahitian paintings of Paul Gauguin, Waller’s first love as a young painter. The brooding sense of melancholy and langour, and the playing of music are symbiotic with Gauguin’s world. The approach to tone and colour, however, are very much informed by his immersion in Odd Nerdrum’s work and the Classical figurative approach. Several other pieces, such as Boy and Moon, Reverie and The Song of Pan- gaea are either derived from or studies for Secrets. Where Secrets only tangentially references Greek figures such as Pan and the Mino- taur, The Children of Lir explicitly references the famous Irish tale of the same name. It does not attempt to illustrate the story, but rather presents both bird and human form together, the human figures in a state of transformative tension, the swans in a state of lateral collapse (death?) and purposeful movement. -
Why Was Jan Van Eyck Here? the Subject, Sitters, and Significance of the Arnolfini Marriage Portrait
Venezia Arti [online] ISSN 2385-2720 Vol. 26 – Dicembre 2017 [print] ISSN 0394-4298 Why Was Jan van Eyck here? The Subject, Sitters, and Significance of The Arnolfini Marriage Portrait Benjamin Binstock (Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, New York City, USA) Abstract Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini Marriage Portrait of 1434 still poses fundamental questions. An overlooked account explained the groom’s left hand holding his bride’s right hand as a secular, legal morganatic marriage with a bride of lower social rank and wealth. That would explain Van Eyck’s presence as witness in the mirror and through his inscription, and corresponds to the recent identification of the bride and groom as Giovanni di Arrigo Arnolfini and his previously unknown first wife Helene of unknown last name. Van Eyck’s scene can be called the first modern painting, as the earliest autonomous, illusionistic representation of secular reality, provided with the earliest artist’s signature of the modern type, framing his scene as perceived and represented by a particular individual. That is why Jan van Eyck was here. Summary 1 What is being disguised: religious symbolism or secular art? – 2 A morganatic, left-handed marriage. – 3 The sitters: Giovanni di Arrigo Arnolfini and his first wife Helene? – 4 Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait as the first modern painting. – 5 Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait within his oeuvre and tradition. – 6 Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait and art historical method. Keywords Jan van Eyck. Signature. Arnolfini. Morganatic Marriage. Modern painting. For Marek Wieczorek What is the hardest of all? What you think is the easiest. -
Hans Memling's Last Judgementin Gdańsk: Technical Evidence
BERNHARD RIDDERbOS AND MOLLY FARIES Hans Memling’s Last Judgement in Gdańsk: technical evidence and creative process* ‘New data’ and an attribution Studying the materials and techniques that were used by early Netherlandish painters has become an indispensable part of art-historical research into the works of these masters. It can therefore be applauded that in the last few years a prestigious project, employing a variety of technical methods, was carried out in order to investigate the execution of one of the masterpieces of fifteenth-century Flemish art: theLast Judgement in Gdańsk, attributed 1 Hans Memling, Triptych with to Hans Memling (figs. 1 and 10). This project, in which a large international team of researchers the Last Judgement, middle panel participated, was co-ordinated by Iwona Szmelter of the Faculty of Conservation and 220.9 x 160.7 cm; Paradise, left interior wing, and Hell, Restoration of Works of Art at the Warsaw Academy of Fine Arts. She has appeared as right interior wing, each lead author in several English language summaries of the research. In 2013, Iwona Szmelter 223.5 x 72.5 cm, Gdańsk, Muzeum Narodowe. Photo: and Tomasz Ważny presented some of the first results in Warsaw at the congress of the art work in the public domain. International Council of Museums - Committee for Conservation (ICOM-CC).1 57 Oud Holland 2017 volume 130 - 3/4 In their paper they mention that in the nineteenth century the painting was ascribed variously to the Van Eyck brothers, Rogier van der Weyden and Hans Memling, and although the authorship of the latter has now generally been accepted, they are of the opinion that this attribution is still questionable. -
Jan Van Eyck's Arnolfini Portrait Author(S): Erwin Panofsky Reviewed Work(S): Source: the Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs, Vol
Jan van Eyck's Arnolfini Portrait Author(s): Erwin Panofsky Reviewed work(s): Source: The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs, Vol. 64, No. 372 (Mar., 1934), pp. 117- 119+122-127 Published by: The Burlington Magazine Publications Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/865802 . Accessed: 12/09/2012 10:56 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Burlington Magazine Publications Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs. http://www.jstor.org JAN VAN EYCK'S ARNOLFINI PORTRAIT BY ERWIN PANOFSKY OR about three quarters of a cen- in the inventories (a man and a woman stand- tury Jan van Eyck's full-length ing in a room and joining hands) is absolutely portrait of a newly married couple unique in northern fifteenth-century panel- (or, to speak more exactly, a man painting, jits identity with the London portrait and a woman represented in the seems to be fairly well established; moreover, act of contracting matrimony)1 has been almost considering that the picture formerly belong- unanimously acknowledged to be the portrait ing to the Hapsburg princesses disappeared of Giovanni Arnolfini, a native of Lucca, who after 1789, and the London portrait appeared in settled at Bruges before 1421 and later attained 1815, lit seems safe to assume that the latter is the rank of a " Conseiller du Duc de identical with the former and was carried off Bourgogne " and " G6n6ral des Finances en during the Napoleonic wars.