Organic Farming - the Future of the Agricultural Economy of Bulgaria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Organic Farming - the Future of the Agricultural Economy of Bulgaria Trakia Journal of Sciences, Vol. 17, Suppl. 1, pp 572-576, 2019 Copyright © 2019 Trakia University Available online at: http://www.uni-sz.bg ISSN 1313-7069 (print) ISSN 1313-3551 (online) doi:10.15547/tjs.2019.s.01.091 ORGANIC FARMING - THE FUTURE OF THE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY OF BULGARIA G. Mitev* Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria ABSTRACT Organic farming owes its emergence, existence and principles to the nature itself, while the fundamental rule of its practice is to be in harmony with it, without harming it. In fact, it is a new perception of the environment and a new attitude towards its protection, both now and in the future. Organic farming combines the best environmental practices, high biodiversity, the conservation of natural resources and high production standards based on natural substances and processes. It also corresponds to a specific market that responds to specific consumer demands while at the same time it provides public goods that are in terms with environmental protection, animal welfare and rural development. Key words: agroecology, organic farming, biodiversity, organic products. INTRODUCTION ecological areas, based on territorial location Organic farming is an important priority in the and climate, productive opportunities and their agricultural development policy of the suitability for cultivation of different plant Republic of Bulgaria and one of the highlights species according to the bonus score. This agri- of the Common Agricultural Policy. The environmental zoning shows the great adopted European standards for organic and opportunities of our country for the organic production, for food quality, etc., act development of organic production, thanks to as indirect Community regulators for the natural, climatic and soil diversity, which protection of the environment and ensuring determine the wide range of products that can food safety and animal welfare. (1) be grown organically. The main objective is to encourage farmers to We can positively state that in Bulgaria there switch to or sustain organic farming, while are good conditions for the development of contributing to: protecting the environment - organic agriculture. To this we can add the strengthening agro-ecosystems, protecting timely synchronization of our agri- biodiversity and enabling future generations to environmental legislation with the European benefit from preserved nature; Healthy food one, which opens the markets of Europe for production - this form of agriculture responds our organic products. to the growing needs of consumers as it uses safe and transparent production methods; 1. The essence, principles and rules of social impact - creates employment in rural organic farming areas and more jobs than conventional 1.1 Nature of organic farming agriculture. (MAF, 2014) Organic farming is such a production system that does not allow or completely exclude the Bulgaria is one of the countries in Europe with use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, growth the highest rates of biodiversity. Conditionally, regulators and feed additives, and in which the its territory can be divided into 14 agro- crop and crop residues are relied upon to ___________________________ maintain and improve the soil's nutritional *Correspondence to: Georgi Mitev, PhD, status, manure, green manure and biological Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, plant protection. It is important to realize that Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria Post organic farming is much more than the code: 6000, e-mail: [email protected] exclusion of pesticides and mineral fertilizers. 572 Trakia Journal of Sciences, Vol. 17, Suppl. 1, 2019 MITEV G. This is a different manufacturing method, - Maintaining a buffer zone between the which is imholistic in nature, involving the farm and neighboring conventional farms to implementation of many preventative prevent accidental contamination. measures. Organic production can only be successful if its overall concept is understood General principles of organic farming: and applied. (2) .The definition of organic Health Principles: Organic agriculture must farming given by the World Food Organization maintain and enhance the fertility of soil, (FAO) is as follows: plants, animals and humans as a whole. "Organic farming is a holistic production Principle of ecology: Organic farming should management system that promotes and be based on living ecological systems and enhances agro-ecosystem health, including cycles, working with them and helping to biodiversity, biological circulators and soil maintain them. Honesty principle: Organic biological activity. farming must be built on interrelationships that ensure honesty with regard to the nature of Organic farming goals: vital relationships. Organic products from third (a) Putting in place a sustainable agricultural countries of the Common Market are only management system which: permitted where they are produced and - is compatible with the systems and controlled under the same or equivalent cycles of nature, preserves and improves the conditions, which eases the import regime. health of soil, water, plants, animals and the balance between them; When purchasing products bearing the EU - contributes to a high degree of logo, consumers are assured that: biodiversity; - at least 95% of the ingredients of the - responsibly uses energy and natural product, of agricultural origin, are produced by resources such as water, soil, organic matter the organic production method; and air; - the product complies with the - compies with high animal welfare requirements of the official control scheme; standards, in particular meeting the animal- - the product comes directly from the specific behavioral needs of animals; manufacturer or processor in a sealed package; (b) Production of high quality products; - the product bears the name of the (c) The production of a wide variety of foods manufacturer, processor or supplier and the and other agricultural products that meet the name or code of the inspection body. consumer demand for goods produced through Organic producers and importers must comply the application of processes that do not harm with strict regulatory requirements if they wish the environment, human health, plant and to use the EU organic logo. This requirement is animal health. (3) monitored at all stages of the production- 1.2 Organic farming principles supply cycle to assure consumers that they are The documents of the International Federation purchasing organic food produced to European of Organic Farming (IFOAM) standards that has been subjected to the (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biculture) relevant inspection procedures. outline the basic principles and activities to be The new procedure allows the EU Commission followed for organic farming: to exercise oversight and greater control over - Production of food of high quality and the import of organic products and the sufficient quantity; regulation of organic guarantees, and sets the - Harmony with the natural systems stage for the adoption of EU rules on organic without dominating them; aquaculture and algae. - Maintaining and raising for a long period of soil fertility; Cases where they are produced and controlled - Using variety of crop rotations under the same or equivalent conditions, saturated with legumes, which include natural thereby facilitating the import arrangements. and artificial meadows and pastures; - Not using synthetic pesticides and When purchasing products bearing the EU fertilizers; logo, consumers are assured that: - Applying mechanical and thermal - at least 95% of the ingredients of the weed control methods and alternative means of product, of agricultural origin, are produced by controlling diseases and pests; the organic production method; - Maintaining strict accounting of the - the product complies with the farm; requirements of the official control scheme; Trakia Journal of Sciences, Vol. 17, Suppl. 1, 2019 573 MITEV G. - the product comes directly from the - Environmental protection - strengthens manufacturer or processor in a sealed package; agro-ecosystems, conserves biodiversity and - the product bears the name of the enables future generations to benefit from manufacturer, processor or supplier and the preserved nature; name or code of the inspection body. - Healthy food production - this form of farming responds to the needs of a growing Organic producers and importers must comply number of consumers as it uses safe and with strict regulatory requirements if they wish transparent production methods; to use the EU organic logo. This requirement is - Social impact - creates employment in monitored at all stages of the production- rural areas and more jobs than conventional supply cycle to assure consumers that they are agriculture. (6) purchasing organic food produced to European standards that has been subjected to the 2.1 The state of organic production in Bulgaria relevant inspection procedures. in 2019 The new procedure allows the EU Commission There are very good prerequisites for the to exercise oversight and greater control over development of organic production in Bulgaria the import of organic products and the - ecologically preserved areas. regulation of organic guarantees, and sets the stage for the adoption of EU rules on organic The information on the state of organic aquaculture and algae. (4) production in Bulgaria for 2019 is based on data from the annual reports of officially 2. Current state of organic farming
Recommended publications
  • Agricultural Sector in Bulgaria During the Transition to Market Economy and the Integration Into the European Union
    Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal www.are-journal.com JEL: Q1, F02, N5, P41 1 2 Rossitsa Rangelova , Katia Vladimirova 1Economic Research Institute, Bulgarian Academy Sciences 2University for National and World Economy Bulgaria AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN BULGARIA DURING THE TRANSITION TO MARKET ECONOMY AND THE INTEGRATION INTO THE EUROPEAN UNION The paper is aimed at outlining the main features of the reforms in the agricultural sector and development in Bulgaria from 1989 onwards. This is the period of transition from centrally planned to market economy and the following integration into the European Union (EU). Firstly, the reforms in agriculture during the early transition to market economy in the 1990s are discussed. Further on the reforms in agriculture related to the integration of Bulgaria into the EU are described. Problems and challenges for the agricultural sector in Bulgaria under the conditions of EU membership, including the role of CAP are analyzed. The two periods for financing and development of the agricultural sector in Bulgaria are considered: First programming period (2007–2013) and Second programming period (2014–2020). Finally recommendations are given concerning building competitive Bulgarian agriculture in the conditions of the CAP. Key words: agriculture, Bulgaria, transition to market economy, ЕU integration. Introduction and review of literature. The agriculture has long been the most important sector for Bulgaria mainly due to the availability of natural resources, traditions, high employment of the population, and late transition to industrial development. In the 20th century agriculture in Bulgaria passed through three radically different periods of development. Two of these periods were described in the two authors’ article “Long-term retrospective development of agricultutre in Bulgaria, 1934–1989” [16, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Report
    “Boosting Adult System Education In Agriculture” AGRI BASE Erasmus+ KA2 Strategic Partnerships Baseline report SYSTEM OF ADULT EDUCATION AND TRAINING in the Field of Agriculture 2016 SYSTEM OF ADULT EDUCATION AND TRAINING in the Field of Agriculture AGRI BASE This document was created within the Erasmus+ project "Boosting Adult System Education In Agriculture" AgriBase Ref. No. 2015-1-MK01-KA204-002857 O1 leading institution:University of East Sarajevo, BH AgriBase participating institutions: OCULL „Vanco Prke“-R Macedonia, University of East Sarajevo-BH,University of Foggia-Italy, Polytechnic University of Cartagena-Spain, NGO Webin- R Serbia, College Iliria-Kosovo, University 1 Dec.1918 Alba Iulia- Romania, Technical University of Varna- Bulgaria, Estonian University of Life Sciences-Estonia, Cukurova University- Turkey Contributors: Dimitrova M, Mitasev G, Petrov T, Kulina M, Vukojevic D, Radovic M, Stasi A, Conte A, Beneduce L, Amodio ML, Acosta JA, Martinez S, Gomez- Lopez LD, Zornoza R, Stojanovic M, Reci A, Levente G, Iordacescu D, Drumeva M, Yankov P, Laikoja K, Tamm M, Cetin M Editor: Grujica Vico English lecture: Marijana Dimitrova CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека "Св. Климент Охридски", Скопје 37:63(062) COMPARATIVE baseline report on adult education in agriculture / [editor Grujica Vico]. - Stip : NI National library "Goce Delčev", 2016. - 231 стр. : илустр. ; 21 см Текст на повеќе јазици ISBN 978-608-242-026-4 а) Едукација на возрасни - Земјоделство - Зборници COBISS.MK-ID 101019402
    [Show full text]
  • Second Draft Republic of Bulgaria National Strategy
    SECOND DRAFT REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA NATIONAL STRATEGY PLAN FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT (2007 –2013) March, 2006 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION І. ASSESSMENT OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SITUATION AND THE POTENTIAL FOR DEVELOPMENT ІІ. RURAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF BULGARIA FOR THE PERIOD 2007- 2013 III. STRATEGY PER AXIS, QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES AND INDICATORS IV. INDICATIVE BUDGET OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME VI. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF THE PLAN, COMPLEMENTARITY WITH OTHER COMMUNITY FUNDING INSTRUMENTS VІI. OBLIGATIONS TO SET UP A NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK AND FORESEEN BUDGET AMOUNT FOR ITS OPERATIONS ATTACHMENTS 2 Abbreviations GDP Gross domestic product GVA Gross value added GP Gross produce AWU Annual working unit FAWF Forest areas for wood-felling UAA Utilized agricultural areas EFTA European free trade association EU European Union EAFRD European agricultural fund for rural development EFF European fishery fund IPGR Institute for plant genetic resources BA Biodiversity act MAF Ministry of agriculture and forestry LAG Local action group MoEW Ministry of Environment and Waters SME Small and medium-size enterprises MF Ministry of Finance NAAS National Agriculture Advisory Service NAEP National agriecology programme NVS National veterinary service NGO Non-governmental organization NARDP National agriculture and rural development plan /under SAPARD Programme/ NPRD National plan for regional development NSI National Statistics Institute NSRF National Strategy Reference Framework OECD Organization for economic cooperation and development PO Producer organization CAP Common agricultural policy LERIT Land estates, registers and information technologies LLVT Life-long vocational training UNDP United Nations Development Programme RDP Rural Development Programme RD Rural Development SAPARD Special Accession Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development 3 І.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Bulgaria Case Study
    Land concentration, land grabbing and people’s struggles in Europe Land concentration, land grabbing and land conflicts in Europe: The case of Boynitsa in Bulgaria Georgi Medarov* This chapter examines the socio-historical processes in Bulgaria that have led to the very visible trend of land centralisation, or land grabs, since 2007. It draws on a case study of land grabbing near the village of Boynitsa in northwest Bulgaria. This region, often described as the ‘poorest region in the EU’, 1 has the highest rate of unemployment in Bulgaria. The chapter sets the issue in the broader context both of land grabbing and the socioeconomic transformations of land property relations that have characterised Bulgaria’s post-1989 shift from state socialism to (neo) liberal capitalism. After the relative economic expansion in the 1970s and 1980s in northwest Bulgaria, the region was severely hit by the economic downturn, particularly in rural areas, caused by rapid de-industrialisation after 1989. After the collapse of state socialism and the ‘shock therapy’ of economic liberalisation, a wide process of de-industrialisation and severe economic downturn swept through the entire country during the 1990s. Initially this affected the agricultural sector and in the late 1990s also the industrial sector, along with policies of mass privatisation and radical austerity. These shifts initially led to land fragmentation and subsequently to re-consolidation of land ownership that excluded most of the rural population, thus, facilitating land grabs. The social effects of this process at the micro level are illustrated by the case study. The chapter opens with a short overview of the historical political economy of the transformation of land property relations in Bulgaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Development in Agriculture and Rural Areas of Bulgaria
    From Study implementing full EU CAP in the first seven years of full EU Membership and the Potentials for improvements Development in agriculture and rural areas of Bulgaria Iordan Velikov From Study implementing full EU CAP in the first seven years of full EU Membership and the Potentials for improvements Development in agriculture and rural areas of Bulgaria Iordan Velikov Iordan Velikov had various involvements with the implementation of CAP instruments in Bulgaria since 2000. In the period 2000-2004 he was working in the Ministry of Agriculture, where he participated in the elaboration of the National Strategic Plan for Rural Development under SAPARD and then was responsible for monitoring and reporting the implementation of three SAPARD measures associated with rural infrastructure and diversification of the rural economy. In the period 2006-2010 he has participated in various evaluation projects for the Rural Development Programme 2007-2013, and more specifically: the ex-ante evaluation 2006-2007, the ongoing evaluations in 2008 and 2009, the midterm evaluation 2010. Iordan Velikov is a master in Strategic Management form Sofia University with various short term trainings and specializations in various aspects of the CAP, the agriculture policy and the broader regional development the 2000-2004 in various new and old EU Member states, Japan and the USA. Published by: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Regional Project for Labour Relations and Social Dialogue in South East Europe Tadeusa Koscuska 8/5 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Tel.: (381 11) 3284
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Approach to Preservation of Food Related Biodiversity
    Trakia Journal of Sciences, Vol. 13, Suppl. 1, pp 340-347, 2015 Copyright © 2015 Trakia University Available online at: http://www.uni-sz.bg ISSN 1313-7069 (print) doi:10.15547/tjs.2015.s.01.058 ISSN 1313-3551 (online) REGIONAL APPROACH TO PRESERVATION OF FOOD RELATED BIODIVERSITY D. Dimitrova1*, T. Ivanova1, M. Chervenkov2, Y. Bosseva1, M. Rumiz3 1Department of Plant and Fungal Diversity and Resources, Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria 2Institute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria 3Slow Food International, Bra, Italy ABSTRACT PURPOSE: Strategy and major results of the Environmentally Sustainable Socio-Economic Development of Rural Areas (ESSEDRA) project are presented. The project relies on collaborative network involving 8 Balkan countries (including Turkey) with leading partnership of Slow Food International and European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism (UK). The overall purpose is to involve local communities in protecting the environment, especially in safeguarding agrobiodiversity and related traditional knowledge, to mitigate the impact of climate change and to secure the sustainable development of rural areas. METHODS: The activities aim at advocating the role of small-scale farmers in biodiversity protection, promoting targeted models and actions to preserve biodiversity, and exchanging best practices and knowledge at a multiregional level. RESULTS: Outcomes from the first stage of the project are presented and in the overall Balkan agriculture tendencies is discussed focusing on the current problems in Bulgarian small-scale agriculture. CONCLUSIONS: Steps for common approach for community-based regional development, biodiversity conservation, policy influencing, advocacy and capacity building in the field, collaboration between stakeholders are proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Vnct8c1kp0d6509lf04fkqne.Pdf
    MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND FORESTRY ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE (AGRARIAN REPORT 2018) AGRARIAN REPORT 2018 III. TRADE IN AGRICULTURAL GOODS 83 1. Level and dynamics of foreign trade in agrarian goods in 2017 83 Table of contents 2. Geographical distribution of foreign trade in agricultural goods 84 3. Agricultural trading by groups of commodities 89 List of abbreviations 15 4. Development of foreign trade in agricultural goods in 2018 96 SECTION А 15 5. Activities supporting the export of agricultural production 97 I. STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY. MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK. IV. SUPPORT FOR THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR 101 THE PLACE OF THE AGRARIAN SECTOR IN THE NATIONAL ECONOMY 15 1. Support under the First Pillar of the EU Common Agricultural Policy 101 II. DEVELOPMENT OF AGRARIAN SECTOR IN 2017 AND FORECASTS FOR 2018 23 1.1. Area-based direct payments, national complements to direct payments and specific 1. Use of agricultural land and structures in agriculture 23 support 111 1.1. Use of lands designated for agriculture 23 1.2. Market support mechanisms 115 1.2. Use of land parcels 24 1.2.1. Milk Sector 116 1.2.1. Land Parcel Identification System 24 1.2.2. Fruit and Vegetables sector 118 1.3. Registration of farmers 25 1.2.3. Bee-keeping sector 120 1.4. Participation of the State Land Fund (SLF) in land relations in Bulgaria 26 1.2.4. Wine sector 122 1.4.1. Provision of properties by the SLF for lease or rental 26 1.2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformations of Rural Areas in Poland and Bulgaria a Case Study
    POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK INSTYTUT GEOGRAFII i PRZESTRZENNEGO ZAGOSPODAROWANIA im. Stanisława Leszczyckiego DOKUMENTACJA GEOGRAFICZNA nr 27 TRANSFORMATIONS OF RURAL AREAS IN POLAND AND BULGARIA A CASE STUDY Editors: BOŻENA GAŁCZYŃSKA MARGARITA ILIEVA WARSZAWA 2002 DOKUMENTACJA GEOGRAFICZNA Komitet Redakcyjny: Krzysztof Błażejczyk (redaktor) Bronisław Górz Andrzej Kowalczyk Teresa Kozłowska-Szczęsna Roman Soja Alojzy Woś Barbara Jaworska (sekretarz) Wydawca: IG i PZ PAN Adres redakcji: 00-818 Warszawa, ul. Twarda 51/55 tel.(48-22) 69 78 851 fax (48-22) 620 62 21 PL-ISSN 0012-5032 ISBN 83-87954-36-5 http://rcin.org.pl POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK INSTYTUT GEOGRAFII i PRZESTRZENNEGO ZAGOSPODAROWANIA im. Stanisława Leszczyckiego DOKUMENTACJA GEOGRAFICZNA nr 27 TRANSFORMATIONS OF RURAL AREAS IN POLAND AND BULGARIA A CASE STUDY Editors: BOŻENA GAŁCZYŃSKA MARGARITA ILIEVA WARSZAWA 2002 http://rcin.org.pl Recenzent: Prof. dr. hab. Andrzej Stasiak http://rcin.org.pl Table of Contens Introduction Bożena Gałczyńska, Margarita Ilieva 5 Transformation of the rural areas in Poland. The spatial processes and the regional differentiation Bożena Gałczyńska 7 Transformation of the rural areas in Bulgaria (processes, territorial disparities) Margarita Ilieva 21 Transformations in the functional structure of the rural areas in Poland. Selected problems Władysława Stola 35 Problems of rural population in Bulgaria Chavdar Mladenow 51 Changes of Polish agriculture in 1990s and the integration with European Union Roman Kulikowski 59 The underdeveloped rural regions - an
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Report
    “Boosting Adult System Education In Agriculture” AGRI BASE Erasmus+ KA2 Strategic Partnerships Baseline report SYSTEM OF ADULT EDUCATION AND TRAINING in the Field of Agriculture 2016 SYSTEM OF ADULT EDUCATION AND TRAINING in the Field of Agriculture AGRI BASE This document was created within the Erasmus+ project "Boosting Adult System Education In Agriculture" AgriBase Ref. No. 2015-1-MK01-KA204-002857 O1 leading institution:University of East Sarajevo, BH AgriBase participating institutions: OCULL „Vanco Prke“-R Macedonia, University of East Sarajevo-BH,University of Foggia-Italy, Polytechnic University of Cartagena-Spain, NGO Webin- R Serbia, College Iliria-Kosovo, University 1 Dec.1918 Alba Iulia- Romania, Technical University of Varna- Bulgaria, Estonian University of Life Sciences-Estonia, Cukurova University- Turkey Contributors: Mitasev G, Petrov T, Kulina M, Vukojevic D, Radovic M, Stasi A, Conte A, Beneduce L, Amodio ML, Acosta JA, Martinez S, Gomez-Lopez LD, Zornoza R, Stojanovic M, Reci A, Levente G, Iordacescu D, Drumeva M, Yankov P, Laikoja K, Tamm M, Cetin M Editor: Grujica Vico English lecture: Marijana Dimitrova CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека "Св. Климент Охридски", Скопје 37:63(062) COMPARATIVE baseline report on adult education in agriculture / [editor Grujica Vico]. - Stip : NI National library "Goce Delčev", 2016. - 231 стр. : илустр. ; 21 см Текст на повеќе јазици ISBN 978-608-242-026-4 а) Едукација на возрасни - Земјоделство - Зборници COBISS.MK-ID 101019402 April, 2016
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Agriculture in Bulgaria
    Investing in your future EUROPEAN UNION OP “Development of the Competitiveness of the Bulgarian European Regional Economy” 2007-2013 Development Fund Project “Promoting the advantages of investing in Bulgaria” BG 161PO003-4.1.01-0001-C0001, with benefi ciary InvestBulgaria Agency, has been implemented with the fi nancial support of the European Union through the European Fund for Regional Development and the national budget of the Republic of Bulgaria. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN BULGARIA CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 2. Overview of Bulgaria 8 3. Overview of the Food and Agriculture sector in Bulgaria 15 4. Human Resources 24 5. Infrastructure and farming land 32 6. Success Stories 35 Introduction INTRODUCTION 4 Introduction Bulgaria provides an end-to-end solution to developing the Food & Agri sector... Unique natural conditions for the cultivation of a wide variety of crops, fruits, and vegetables 50% of the country’s territory is farming land Ecologically clean and fertile soils Very high quality of organic products (ban on GMOs) Established local producers and a strong tradition in the sector Long-standing distribution channels in the former Eastern Bloc The EU acquis on food has been transposed into Bulgarian legislation Very high health and environmental protection standards make Bulgarian food products fully prepared to meet even the highest and most complex consumer requirements. Major foreign investments by multinational companies account for a large - even dominant - market share in several key sectors such as confectionery, dairy products, and food & beverage. The growing demand for new and local food and beverages in Western Europe and beyond will boost the demand for traditional Bulgarian products.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Gerschenkron Right? Bulgarian Agricultural Growth During the Interwar Period in Light of Modern Development Economics
    European Historical Economics Society ! EHES!WORKING!PAPERS!IN!ECONOMIC!HISTORY!!|!!!NO.!82! Was Gerschenkron right? Bulgarian agricultural growth during the Interwar period in light of modern development economics Michael Kopsidis Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (Halle / Germany) Martin Ivanov Department of Philosophy, Sofia University JULY!2015! ! EHES!Working!Paper!|!No.!82!|!July!2015! Was Gerschenkron right? Bulgarian agricultural growth during the Interwar period in light of modern development economics Michael Kopsidis* Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (Halle / Germany) Martin Ivanov** Department of Philosophy, Sofia University Abstract ! The classical view of Bulgaria’s failed industrialization prior to the Second World War was established by Alexander Gerschenkron. According to his interpretation, an inherently backward small peasant agriculture and well-organized peasantry not only retarded growth in agriculture but obstructed any possible industrialization strategy. Following Hayami and Ruttan, we utilize the decomposition of farm labor productivity into land productivity, and land-to-man ratio to analyze the sources of growth in Bulgaria’s agriculture 1887-1939. Our results show that Bulgaria’s peasants did cross the threshold to modern growth during the Interwar period. Rich qualitative evidence supports the findings of our quantitative analysis that contrary to Gerschenkron’s view and conventional wisdom, Bulgaria’s peasants substantially contributed to the modernization of Bulgaria’s economy and society. We interpret our results in light of modern development economics, and conclude that agriculture formed no impediment to Bulgaria’s industrialization. The reasons that a ‘large industrial spurt’ did not occur in Bulgaria until 1945 are not to be found in the agricultural sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria.Pdf
    A saudi man with his horse The Dormition of the Mother of God Cathedral in Varna. Flickr / Charles Roffey Wikimedia / Plamen Agov Bulgaria September 2020 Table of Contents Chapter 1 | Geography . 6 Introduction . 6 Geographical and Divisions . 7 Topography � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �7 Northern Bulgaria � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �7 Balkan Mountains � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �7 Southern Bulgaria � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �8 Black Sea Coast � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �8 Climate . 9 Bodies of Water . 9 Danube � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �9 Maritsa � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �9 Struma � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �9 Tundzha � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �10 Iskŭr � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �10 Major Cities . 10 Sofia � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �10 Plovdiv � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]