An Analysis of Navajo Nation Snow Courses and Snowpack Data in the Chuska Mountains Lani Tsinnajinnie

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Analysis of Navajo Nation Snow Courses and Snowpack Data in the Chuska Mountains Lani Tsinnajinnie University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Water Resources Professional Project Reports Water Resources 4-22-2011 An analysis of Navajo Nation snow courses and snowpack data in the Chuska Mountains Lani Tsinnajinnie Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/wr_sp Recommended Citation Tsinnajinnie, Lani. "An analysis of Navajo Nation snow courses and snowpack data in the Chuska Mountains." (2011). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/wr_sp/49 This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Water Resources at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Water Resources Professional Project Reports by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Analysis of Navajo Nation Snow Courses and Snowpack Data in the Chuska Mountains A Professional Project Report Submitted by Lani Tsinnajinnie In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Water Resources Hydroscience Concentration Water Resources Program The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico March 2011 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was partly supported by the Community Forestry and Environmental Research Partnership Southwest Native American Communities Fellowship. Additional support was also provided by an award from the New Mexico Chapter of the American Water Resources Association. Data and assistance were provided by the Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources including Jason John, Kimberle Davis, Jerome Bekis, Irving Brady, and John Leeper. Special thanks to my advisor, David Gutzler for his guidance. Also thank you to my other committee members, Jason John and Bruce Thomson for their guidance and assistance. 3 Lani Tsinnajinnie LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Navajo Nation Water Management Branch Active Snow Courses .....................17 Table 2 Regional SNOTEL sites...........................................................................................20 Table 3 March SWE correlation matrix ................................................................................29 Table 4 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors................................................................................48 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources Snow Survey Sites ................15 Figure 2 Location Map of Chuska Mountains and Regional SNOTEL sites.....................16 Figure 3 Photo of snow survey sampling equipment used by NNDWR ...........................17 Figure 4 Photo of Missionary Springs snow course, 3/29/2010 ........................................18 Figure 5 Seasonal cycles of snow water equivalent at snow courses in the Chuska Mountains........................................................................................................................23 Figure 6 Seasonal cycles of snow water equivalent at regional SNOTEL sites near Chuska Mountains..........................................................................................................24 Figure 7 Average March SWE at Chuska Mountain and regional snow survey sites.....26 Figure 8 Interannual March SWE variability at Chuska Mountains snow courses ..........27 Figure 9 Comparison of March SWE interannual variability..............................................28 Figure 10a-f Plots with strongest and weakest correlations among Chuska Mountain Sites.................................................................................................................................31 Figure 11 Arbab's Forest 1 pt. Correlation Map..................................................................35 Figure 12 Beaver Spring 1pt correlation map .....................................................................36 Figure 13 Bowl Canyon 1pt Correlation Map ......................................................................38 Figure 14 Fluted Rock 1pt Correlation Map ........................................................................39 Figure 15 Hidden Valley 1 pt Correlation Map ....................................................................41 Figure 16 Missionary Springs 1pt Correlation Map.............................................................42 Figure 17 Tsaile I 1pt Correlation Map.................................................................................44 Figure 18 Tsaile III 1pt Correlation Map ..............................................................................45 Figure 19 Whiskey Creek 1pt Correlation Map ...................................................................46 Figure 20 Principal component time series of March SWE variability ..............................50 Figure 21 Correlation map using optimized March SWE variability..................................51 Figure 22 April snowpack interannual variability.................................................................53 4 Lani Tsinnajinnie TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract............................................................................................................................6 Introduction......................................................................................................................7 Background....................................................................................................................10 Setting, Data and Methods ............................................................................................14 Results...........................................................................................................................22 Seasonal Cycle and Interannual Variability................................................................22 March SWE Correlation..............................................................................................28 Eigen Analysis and Principal Component Analysis ....................................................47 Trend Analyses ..........................................................................................................52 References ....................................................................................................................60 Appendix A: Seasonal cycles for individual Chuska Mountains snow courses..............61 5 Lani Tsinnajinnie Abstract In the arid Southwest, snowpack in mountains plays an essential role in supplying surface water resources throughout the year. This research project uses several methods of statistical analysis to conduct a characterization of snowpack data in the Chuska Mountains and to compare snowpack data of the snow survey sites in the Chuska Mountains to one another and to other regional snow survey sites. Results from this research will provide the Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources information to help determine if any snow survey sites in the Chuska Mountains are redundant and can be discontinued to save time and money, while still providing snowpack information needed by the Navajo Nation. This research project will also provide the tribe with a summary of snowpack patterns, variability and trends in the Chuska Mountains. 6 Lani Tsinnajinnie Introduction In the Southwest region of the United States, snowpack is an important indicator of water resources. Monitoring snowpack can also be used for the interpretation and prediction of climate and hydrologic conditions in the region. Collecting and storing snowpack data is very crucial for water resources agencies and departments to characterize water resources for the year. The Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources collects snowpack data from the Chuska Mountains, which are located in northwestern New Mexico and northeastern Arizona on the Colorado Plateau. The Chuska Mountains are the major mountain range within the political boundaries of the Navajo Nation, thus the Chuska Mountains are a principal location for snowpack and headwaters. Every winter, between December and April, the Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources conducts snow surveys twice a month. These snow surveys are time-consuming and costly. However, collection of snowpack data is an important component of monitoring and managing water resources for the Navajo Nation. In a time of changing climate and uncertainties about water supply in the arid Southwest, more ways of efficiently collecting and interpreting data that would help in the forecast of water supplies are needed. This research may help the Navajo Nation make better predictions of its water supply, as well as provide additional information about the local and regional climate and hydrology. Additionally, this research would help the Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources have a better understanding of its snow survey sites that may save time and money for future collection of snowpack data. 7 Lani Tsinnajinnie The overall research question is “How well is snowpack in the Chuska Mountains represented, based on data from snow survey sites in the Chuska Mountains and from nearby regional snow survey sites?” This question is determined through several sub- questions: 1. What general climate and hydrologic snowpack trends including seasonal cycle, interannual variability, and time of maximum snow water equivalent, can be identified through analysis of the snowpack data in the Chuska Mountains? 2. How do snowpack data from the nine survey sites in the Chuska Mountains compare with one another? Are sites highly covariable? Are there any sites strongly correlated to one another so that data collection from one of those sites could be considered for cessation of
Recommended publications
  • Narbonapass.Pdf
    FIRST-DAY ROAD LOG 1 FIRST-DAY ROAD LOG, FROM GALLUP TO GAMERCO, YAH-TA-HEY, WINDOW ROCK, FORT DEFIANCE, NAVAJO, TODILTO PARK, CRYSTAL, NARBONA PASS, SHEEP SPRINGS, TOHATCHI AND GALLUP SPENCER G. LUCAS, STEVEN C. SEMKEN, ANDREW B. HECKERT, WILLIAM R. BERGLOF, First-day Road Log GRETCHEN HOFFMAN, BARRY S. KUES, LARRY S. CRUMPLER AND JAYNE C. AUBELE ������ ������ ������ ������� ������ ������ ������ ������ �������� Distance: 141.8 miles ������� Stops: 5 ���� ������ ������ SUMMARY ������ �� ������ �� ����� �� The first day’s trip takes us around the southern �� �� flank of the Defiance uplift, back over it into the �� southwestern San Juan Basin and ends at the Hogback monocline at Gallup. The trip emphasizes Mesozoic— especially Jurassic—stratigraphy and sedimentation in NOTE: Most of this day’s trip will be conducted the Defiance uplift region. We also closely examine within the boundaries of the Navajo (Diné) Nation under Cenozoic volcanism of the Navajo volcanic field. a permit from the Navajo Nation Minerals Department. Stop 1 at Window Rock discusses the Laramide Persons wishing to conduct geological investigations Defiance uplift and introduces Jurassic eolianites near on the Navajo Nation, including stops described in this the preserved southern edge of the Middle-Upper guidebook, must first apply for and receive a permit Jurassic depositional basin. At Todilto Park, Stop 2, from the Navajo Nation Minerals Department, P.O. we examine the type area of the Jurassic Todilto For- Box 1910, Window Rock, Arizona, 86515, 928-871- mation and discuss Todilto deposition and economic 6587. Sample collection on Navajo land is forbidden. geology, a recurrent theme of this field conference. From Todilto Park we move on to the Green Knobs diatreme adjacent to the highway for Stop 3, and then to Stop 4 at the Narbona Pass maar at the crest of the Chuska Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall-Runoff Model for Black Creek Watershed, Navajo Nation
    Rainfall-Runoff Model for Black Creek Watershed, Navajo Nation Item Type text; Proceedings Authors Tecle, Aregai; Heinrich, Paul; Leeper, John; Tallsalt-Robertson, Jolene Publisher Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Journal Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest Rights Copyright ©, where appropriate, is held by the author. Download date 25/09/2021 20:12:23 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/301297 37 RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL FOR BLACK CREEK WATERSHED, NAVAJO NATION Aregai Tecle1, Paul Heinrich1, John Leeper2, and Jolene Tallsalt-Robertson2 ABSTRACT This paper develops a rainfall-runoff model for estimating surface and peak flow rates from precipitation storm events on the Black Creek watershed in the Navajo Nation. The Black Creek watershed lies in the southern part of the Navajo Nation between the Defiance Plateau on the west and the Chuska Mountains on the east. The area is in the semiarid part of the Colorado Plateau on which there is about 10 inches of precipitation a year. We have two main purposes for embarking on the study. One is to determine the amount of runoff and peak flow rate generated from rainfall storm events falling on the 655 square mile watershed and the second is to provide the Navajo Nation with a method for estimating water yield and peak flow in the absence of adequate data. Two models, Watershed Modeling System (WMS) and the Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) Hydrological Modeling System (HMS) that have Geographic Information System (GIS) capabilities are used to generate stream hydrographs. Figure 1. Physiographic map of the Navajo Nation with the Chuska The latter show peak flow rates and total amounts of Mountain and Deance Plateau and Stream Gaging Stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona's Wildlife Linkages Assessment
    ARIZONAARIZONA’’SS WILDLIFEWILDLIFE LINKAGESLINKAGES ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT Workgroup Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Arizona’s Wildlife Linkages Assessment Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Siobhan E. Nordhaugen, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Evelyn Erlandsen, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Habitat Branch Paul Beier, Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry Bruce D. Eilerts, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Ray Schweinsburg, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Terry Brennan, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest Ted Cordery, Bureau of Land Management Norris Dodd, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Melissa Maiefski, Arizona Department of Transportation, Environmental Planning Group Janice Przybyl, The Sky Island Alliance Steve Thomas, Federal Highway Administration Kim Vacariu, The Wildlands Project Stuart Wells, US Fish and Wildlife Service 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT First Printing Date: December, 2006 Copyright © 2006 The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written consent from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written consent of the copyright holder. Additional copies may be obtained by submitting a request to: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup E-mail: [email protected] 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Mission Statement “To identify and promote wildlife habitat connectivity using a collaborative, science based effort to provide safe passage for people and wildlife” 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Primary Contacts: Bruce D.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessible Report (PDF)
    United States Department of Agriculture Story Map: Forest Health Summary for Southwestern Region 2019 USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection, Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management, New Mexico State Forestry Background: This is an accessible version of the content on the ESRI Story Map with the Forest Health Summary for the Southwestern Region 2019 which is at: http://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/r3/healthreport. This document contains the text and photographs of the Story Map, however note that the content of the interactive maps are not capable of being reproduced here. Introduction The Forest Health Protection Program works collaboratively with Arizona State Department of Forestry and Fire Management and New Mexico State Forestry to conduct annual aerial detection surveys of forest health conditions. These surveys assess forest insect and disease issues throughout the Southwestern Region. This includes damage such as tree mortality caused by bark beetles, tree defoliation by leaf/needle feeding caterpillars, tree discoloration, or branch flagging caused by pathogens, and abiotic factors like hail damage. In 2019, approximately 23,100,000 acres of Federal, state and private forest and woodlands in NM and AZ were surveyed. Insect and disease damage detectable from an aircraft were recorded by host, damage agent and intensity of damage using the Digital Mobile Sketchmapping application on Android tablets. Damage is recorded with points for small occurrences or with polygons for larger areas and given intensity levels depending on the severity of the damage. When interpreting this data, special attention should be paid to intensity levels. For more information on data interpretation, please read the methodology section below.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of the Cenozoic Igneous Rocks, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah
    Hydrogeology of the Cenozoic Igneous Rocks, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 521-D Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Navajo Tribe .. HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE CENOZOIC IGNEOUS ROCKS, NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RESERVATIONS, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH Boundary Butte, one of the iHolated volcanic necks in the Navajo country. Photograph by E. T. Nichols. • Hydrogeology of the Cenozoic Igneous Rocks, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona, New Mexico, and U tab By]. P. AKERS,]. C. SHORTY, and P.R. STEVENS HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RESERVATIONS, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 521-D Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau oj Indian Affairs and the Nava;·o Tribe UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract __________________________________________ _ D1 Volcanic rocks _____________________________________ _ D4 Introduction ______________________________________ _ 1 Monchiquite province __________________________ _ 5 Minette province ______________________________ _ Purpose, scope, and organization of the report_ ____ _ 1 9 Basalt province ________________________________ _ 12 Location ______________________________________ _ 2 Hydrology of the volcanic rocks _____________________ _ Fieldwork ____________________________________ :..._ 13 2 Diatremes ____________________________________ _ 13 Acknowledgments ______________________________ _ 2 Chemical quality of the ground water ____________ _ 15 Previous investigations _____________________________ _ 2 Development of ground water ___________________ _ 15 Stock laccoliths ____________________________________ _ 3 Literature cited ___________________________________ -_ 17 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FRONTISPIECE.
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Nation Snowpack Variability from 1985-2014 and Implications for Water Resources Management *Lani M
    124 Universities Council on Water Resources Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education Issue 163, Pages 124-138, April 2018 Navajo Nation Snowpack Variability from 1985-2014 and Implications for Water Resources Management *Lani M. Tsinnajinnie1, David S. Gutzler2, and Jason John3 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, 2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 3Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources, Water Management Branch, Ft. Defiance, AZ *Corresponding Author Abstract: In the arid Southwest, snowpack in mountains plays an essential role in supplying surface water resources. Water managers from the Navajo Nation monitor snowpack at nine snow survey stations located in the Chuska Mountains and Defiance Plateau in northern Arizona and New Mexico. We characterize these snowpack data for the period 1985-2014 and evaluate the efficacy of snowpack data collection efforts. Peak snow water equivalent occurs in early to mid-March depending on elevation. Variability in snowpack levels correlates highly among all sites (r > 0.64), but higher elevation sites in the Chuska Mountains correlate more strongly with one another compared to lower elevation sites and vice versa. Northern sites also correlate well with each other. A principal component analysis is used to create a weighted average time series of year-to-year peak snowpack variability. The first principal component showed no trend in increasing or decreasing Navajo Nation snowpack. Results from this research will provide the Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources information to help determine if any snow survey sites in the Chuska Mountains are redundant and can be discontinued to save time and money, while still providing snowpack information needed by the Navajo Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoclimatic Indicators of Surface Water Resources in the Chuska Mountains, Navajo Nation
    PALEOCLIMATIC INDICATORS OF SURFACE WATER RESOURCES IN THE CHUSKA MOUNTAINS, NAVAJO NATION Becky Brice School of Geography and Development Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research University of Arizona [email protected] Climate Assessment of the Southwest Climate and Society Fellowship Final Report 2018 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Declining snow water equivalent is impacting water resources in northeastern Arizona, a condition that is expect to be exacerbated in a warming and drying future. • Water availability is a critical issue for the Navajo Nation in the coming decades. Navajo tribal members who use the lakes along the crest of the Chuska Mountains for stock, wildlife, and recreation report declining lake levels and diminished surface water availability. • Projections of rising temperatures and possible precipitation declines in the southwestern United States suggest that diminished surface water resources in the Chuska Mountains may continue in the future. • Instrumental records of climate and of surface waters in the Chuska Mountains are acutely limited. The Navajo Nation began recording snow depth and snow water equivalent in 1985. At the time of this study, no lake level records existed for the Chuskas. • This study is a collaborative effort with the aim of co-producing knowledge about the long-term variability of snow water equivalent and surface waters in the Chuska Mountains of the Navajo Nation. It is the result of collective efforts of the Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources Water Management Branch and the University of Arizona. The goal was to produce management relevant science products for the modern and paleo periods. • The study represents the first attempt to place current snow water equivalent conditions in the context of the last 400 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Mountain Vole (Microtus Mogollonensis)
    TOC Page | 61 NAVAJO MOUNTAIN VOLE (MICROTUS MOGOLLONENSIS) Navajo/Federal Statuses: NESL G4 / not listed under the ESA. Distribution: Range of M.mogollonensis is AZ, NM and Mexico with small populations in southern UT, CO, and TX. M.m.navaho range extends from Williams, AZ to Mesa Verde, CO, including four locations on Navajo Nation: Navajo Mountain, Black Mesa, Defiance Plateau, and Chuska Mountains. Habitat: Typically occupy dry grassy vegetation in conifer forests, with variations including: dense prostrate shrub patches in ponderosa pine forests (Navajo Mountain); monotypic sagebrush stands, thick grasses in greasewood/ desert-olive stands and juniper stands, shrubby tamarisk thickets and chained pinyon and juniper woodlands (Black Mesa); and clear-cut pine flats with regenerating grasses and scattered oak (Chuska Mountains). Ground cover vegetation is necessary. Similar Species: Clethrionomys gapperi has reddish fur on dorsum; Microtus montanus and M. longicaudus have slightly longer tails and four pair of mammary glands. Phenology: m.APR-l.AUG: pregnancy, birthing, lactating of young e.SEP-m.APR: non-breeding season Survey Method: t1 pedestrian survey for habitat evaluation and presence of runways; species identification requires live-trapping. Avoidance: No activity (year-round) within 60 m of occupied habitat that could result in destruction of burrows/runways and take of individuals. References: Frey, J.K. and C.T. LaRue. 1993. Notes on the distribution of the mogollon vole (Microtus mogollonensis) in New Mexico and Arizona. Southwestern Naturalist 38:176-178. Hoffmeister, D.F. 1986. Mammals of Arizona. University of Arizona Press. (description p.441). Spicer, R.B. 1987. Status of the Navajo Mountain Mexican vole (Microtus mexicanus navaho Benson) along the Arizona-Utah border.
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Nation Species Accounts
    TOC Page |i PREFACE: NESL SPECIES ACCOUNTS Welcome to Version 4.20 of the Navajo Nation Endangered Species List Species Accounts which were produced to accompany The Navajo Nation’s February 13, 2020 revision to the Navajo Endangered Species List. The order of Accounts follows the February 2020 revision of the NESL, a copy of which is enclosed for reference. These Accounts were developed and distributed by the Navajo Natural Heritage Program, of the Navajo Nation Department of Fish and Wildlife, to help planners and biologists answer basic questions about species of concern during project planning. Your constructive comments are encouraged. Species Accounts are preliminary tools for project planning. Their target audiences are project planners, and biologists not familiar with: 1) species’ life histories and habitat in this region; and 2) Tribal and Federal protection requirements. Their purpose is to provide clear-cut information so that basic questions can be answered early in the planning process. Therefore, they should be reviewed as soon as potential species for the project area are identified. Accounts will prove useful early in the planning process, but they should be used as a quick-reference anytime. If protected species are found then more research and likely coordination with the Department will be necessary. At the end of each account is a short bibliography for planning the details of surveys, and answering more in-depth questions. For planning surveys and developing avoidance/mitigation measures, Accounts no longer distinguish between required and recommended activities; i.e. the terms ‘suggested survey method’ or ‘recommended avoidance’ are not used in V 4.20.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(S): T
    Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(s): T. H. Kearney Source: Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Oct., 1964), pp. 94-103 Published by: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40022366 Accessed: 21/05/2010 20:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=anas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. http://www.jstor.org ARIZONA LOCALITIESOF INTEREST TO BOTANISTS Compiled by T.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264884775 Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section... Article CITATIONS READS 38 120 10 authors, including: William H. Romme M. Lisa Floyd Colorado State University Prescott College 120 PUBLICATIONS 8,999 CITATIONS 34 PUBLICATIONS 2,146 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Michele R. Crist Henri Grissino-Mayer Conservation Science Partners University of Tennessee 11 PUBLICATIONS 292 CITATIONS 148 PUBLICATIONS 4,811 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Lagoon Microbialites of the Gulf of Mexico View project Fire Disturbance in the Appalachian Mountains View project All content following this page was uploaded by Michele R. Crist on 11 September 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2.
    [Show full text]
  • AZWILD Fall 0506
    NEWSLETTER OF THE ARIZONA WILDERNESS COALITION ARIZONA WILDWILD An Immeasurable Legacy Rep. GiffordsGiffords on the Udalls Tassel Eared SquirrelsSquirrels Backpack or Pack Animal? Discover Cochise County Wild Lands! SUMMER 2010 Arizona Wilderness Coalition Main Office FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 520-326-4300 P.O. Box 40340, Tucson, AZ 85717 With New Leadership, Opportunity Phoenix Office 602-252-5530 Knocks P.O. Box 13524 Phoenix, AZ 85002 by Matt Skroch Central Arizona Field Office 928-717-6076 P.O. Box 2741 t is with great excitement and dedication that I opportunity knocks. Allow me to emphasize that Prescott, AZ 86302 step into the executive director position at the you—our dedicated members—are an integral part of Arizona Wilderness Coalition (AWC). My role AWC’s present and future. Our membership is the Ihere, like that of everyone involved with pro- lifeblood of our collective actions, giving voice and fAWC Staf tecting Arizona’s wild places under the banner of power to the places and wildlife we pledge to conserve. Matt Skroch, Executive Director, AWC, is wholly made pos- We look forward to culti- [email protected] sible through the out- vating and growing our Katurah Mackay, Deputy Director, growth of support from the relationship with you in [email protected] community of wilderness coming months. Sam Frank, Central Arizona Director, advocates to which you Finally, I’d like to [email protected] belong. Thank you for acknowledge the contribu- Paula Toffolo, Membership Coordinator, being an integral part of tions and hard work of [email protected] this great organization. Kevin Gaither-Banchoff Liana MacNeill, Sonoran Desert Outreach and The Arizona over the last several years Volunteer Coordinator, Wilderness Coalition has a as our executive director [email protected] bold and ever-important (see p.9).
    [Show full text]