DOCSLIB.ORG

Airport Operations and Management Assessment Gratiot Community Airport (AMN) Alma, MI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airport Operations and Management Assessment Gratiot Community Airport (AMN) Alma, MI Airport Operations and Management Assessment Gratiot Community Airport (AMN) Alma, MI May 2020 Report prepared by www.meadhunt.com Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Foundational Information ....................................................................................................................... 5 A. Data Collection Effort ........................................................................................................................ 5 B. Role in the National Airspace System and the Michigan Aviation System ....................................... 9 C. Current Infrastructure ...................................................................................................................... 11 D. Aircraft Operations .......................................................................................................................... 12 E. Revenues and Expenses ................................................................................................................ 18 F. Local Business Environment and Services ..................................................................................... 18 G. Existing Management and Maintenance of the Airport ................................................................... 20 3. Airport Obligations and Authority Membership .................................................................................... 21 A. Airport Obligations ........................................................................................................................... 21 B. Airport Closure or Privatization ....................................................................................................... 23 C. Authority Membership ..................................................................................................................... 25 D. Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 27 4. Management and Efficiency Issues ..................................................................................................... 28 A. Points of Contact / Chain of Command ........................................................................................... 28 B. Fixed Base Operator(s) (FBOs) ...................................................................................................... 29 C. Staffing ............................................................................................................................................ 30 D. Fueling Considerations ................................................................................................................... 31 5. Revenue and Expense Considerations ............................................................................................... 32 A. General Revenue Sources .............................................................................................................. 32 B. Existing Revenues at Gratiot Community Airport............................................................................ 32 C. Budget Comparison with Peer Airports ........................................................................................... 33 D. Financial Scenarios ......................................................................................................................... 34 E. Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 43 6. Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 45 Summary of Appendices ............................................................................................................................. 47 Page 2 of 47 Table of Figures Figure 1 – Proximity of Gratiot Community Airport to Cities of Alma and Ithaca Figure 2 – Location of Gratiot Community Airport within Gratiot County Figure 3 – FAA General Aviation Airports: A National Asset (ASSET Study) Figure 4 – MASP 2017 Airport Report Card for Gratiot Community Airport Figure 5 – Traffic Flow Management System Counts – 2019 Figure 6 – AMN Revenue Sources Figure 7 – Relative Comparison of Scenario 20-Year Results Table of Tables Table 1 – Summary of Gratiot Community Airport MASP 2017 Tier Classifications Table 2 – Primary Infrastructure Information Table 3 – Terminal Area Forecast Information Table 4 – Aircraft Reference Code Components Table 5 – Summary of TFMSC for Calendar Year 2019 Table 6 – Comparison of Peer Airport with TAF and TFMSC Activity Data Table 7 – Flights Registered in Official Airport Registry 2016 - 2018 Table 8 – Comparison of Revenue and Expenses from 2008 - 2019 Table 9 – FY2019 Budget Comparisons with Peer Airports Table 10 – Summary of Anticipated Revenue Generated from Airport Millage Options Table 11 – Estimated 20-Year Accumulations of Operating Surpluses/Deficits Table 12 – Estimated Increased Fuel Sales in 2020 Needed to Break Even under Scenario 2b Page 3 of 47 Mead & Hunt was asked by the Gratiot County of Board of Commissioners,(County Board) to undertake an evaluation of the Gratiot Community Airport (Airport or AMN) to assess possible ways to improve the efficiency, management, and revenue generation for the Airport. Additionally, a summary of the impacts of possible closure of the Airport with regards to the responsibility of Gratiot Community Airport Authority (Airport Authority) members was also requested. This report provides the summary of this analysis and outlines possible items for consideration by the County Board and the Airport Authority that address each of these areas. This report is organized around four primary sections and the summary as noted below: • Section 2 - Foundational Information • Section 3 – Airport Obligations and Authority Membership • Section 4 - Management and Efficiency Issues • Section 5 - Revenue and Expense Considerations • Section 6 - Summary Many of the concepts that are addressed in this report are interwoven with each other due to the nature of how the Airport currently operates. As such, an attempt has been made to separate the issues; however, in many instances, this is not feasible, therefore some topics will be addressed together. This report will attempt to quantify some of these considerations, so the County Board and the Airport Authority have data to support their decision making in the future. The information and the resulting findings contained in this report are based upon the consultants’ experience with other airports, both in the State of Michigan and across the United States, consultation with the Michigan Department of Transportation Office of Aeronautics (MDOT AERO) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), review of historic documents and interviews with an assortment of local stakeholders. It is important to remember that in the aviation industry, there is a saying that “if you’ve seen one airport, you’ve seen one airport.” This is important to keep in mind because what is very true across the aviation industry is that no two airports operate in the same exact manner and this applies to everything from the type of management, ownership, revenue sources, level of operations, type of use, and the list goes on. Consequently, several places in this report will provide a comparison of the Airport to other airports in the region as general representation of the way these airports operate and their results. In each instance, this cannot be taken as an equal comparison since all the variables previously mentioned become factors that contribute to their individual situation and their decision-making process. Page 4 of 47 This section contains a summary of important data that is key to the overall assessment of the airport. As the section title implies, this data provides the foundation from which the Airport and its operation can be assessed. A. Data Collection Effort The data collection effort for this study encompasses numerous elements that are important to building the understanding of the current airport infrastructure, operations, management, and perceptions of the airport by those involved in its operation and use. To address all these issues required a very broad data collection effort. This focused on looking at the ownership, the physical attributes of the airport, annual aircraft operations, and expenses and revenues. To support the data collection, information was obtained through a variety of resources including the County, the City of Alma, the airport manager, and the Fixed Base Operator (FBO), as well as MDOT AERO and the FAA. A portion of the data was obtained from a variety of documents while other data was obtained from interviews, which are outlined below. Interviews To obtain a comprehensive picture of the operation of the Airport, more than a dozen interviews were conducted with representatives from each municipality within the Airport Authority, the airport manager and the FBO, and various economic interests within the community. These interviews were conducted by Mead & Hunt staff and were intended to solicit insight from the interviewees on their opinions regarding the operation, management, and funding of the Airport as well as any other insights they cared to share with the interviewer. Additionally, interviews with peer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS to AIRPORTS (Pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing by State, City and Airport
    CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS TO AIRPORTS (pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing By State, City And Airport State City Airport Name LOC_ID Grand Totals AK Alaskan Consolidated Airports Multiple [individual airports listed separately] AKAP $16,855,355 AK Adak (Naval) Station/Mitchell Field Adak ADK $30,000 AK Akhiok Akhiok AKK $20,000 AK Akiachak Akiachak Z13 $30,000 AK Akiak Akiak AKI $30,000 AK Akutan Akutan 7AK $20,000 AK Akutan Akutan KQA $20,000 AK Alakanuk Alakanuk AUK $30,000 AK Allakaket Allakaket 6A8 $20,000 AK Ambler Ambler AFM $30,000 AK Anaktuvuk Pass Anaktuvuk Pass AKP $30,000 AK Anchorage Lake Hood LHD $1,053,070 AK Anchorage Merrill Field MRI $17,898,468 AK Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage International ANC $26,376,060 AK Anchorage (Borough) Goose Bay Z40 $1,000 AK Angoon Angoon AGN $20,000 AK Aniak Aniak ANI $1,052,884 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Togiak TOG $20,000 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Twin Hills A63 $20,000 AK Anvik Anvik ANV $20,000 AK Arctic Village Arctic Village ARC $20,000 AK Atka Atka AKA $20,000 AK Atmautluak Atmautluak 4A2 $30,000 AK Atqasuk Atqasuk Edward Burnell Sr Memorial ATK $20,000 AK Barrow Wiley Post-Will Rogers Memorial BRW $1,191,121 AK Barrow (County) Wainwright AWI $30,000 AK Beaver Beaver WBQ $20,000 AK Bethel Bethel BET $2,271,355 AK Bettles Bettles BTT $20,000 AK Big Lake Big Lake BGQ $30,000 AK Birch Creek Birch Creek Z91 $20,000 AK Birchwood Birchwood BCV $30,000 AK Boundary Boundary BYA $20,000 AK Brevig Mission Brevig Mission KTS $30,000 AK Bristol Bay (Borough) Aleknagik /New 5A8 $20,000 AK
    [Show full text]
  • Advertisement for Bids Rehabilitate Runway 10-28 and Taxiway B (East End) at Mason Jewett Field Mason, Michigan
    ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS REHABILITATE RUNWAY 10-28 AND TAXIWAY B (EAST END) AT MASON JEWETT FIELD MASON, MICHIGAN Contract No. FM33-1-C25 Sealed proposals will be received by QoE Consulting, PLC, 4100 Capital City Blvd. Floor 2, Lansing, MI 48906, attention Clint Nemeth, on behalf of the CAPITAL REGION AIRPORT AUTHORITY, until 10:00 am local time on Friday, June 3, 2016 at which time bids will be publicly opened and read aloud in the office of QoE Consulting. This project is being bid to provide crack sealing, crack repair, bituminous surface treatment, and pavement marking for runway 10-28 and taxiway B (east end) at Mason Jewett Field. Plans and specifications are available from the office of the consultant, QoE Consulting, 4100 Capital City Blvd., Floor 2, Lansing, MI 48906, Phone: (517) 327-1980 or [email protected]. Electronic documents are available at no cost, hard copies are available for purchase from the consultant for $50. A Pre-bid Meeting will be held at 10:00 am local time on Wednesday, May 25, 2016, at the Mason Jewett Field Terminal Building, 655 Aviation Dr., Mason, Michigan 48854. A representative from the consultant will meet with prospective bidders to discuss the project. The project will be funded with State of Michigan and Federal Aviation Administration funds. Therefore, the contractor will be required to meet Davis-Bacon wage rates. No DBE participation is required. A cashier’s check, certified check or bid bond for a sum not less than five percent (5%) of the amount of the bid will be required with each proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Listings of General Aviation Airports
    Appendix B-1: Summary by State Public New ASSET Square Public NPIAS Airports Not State Population in Categories Miles Use Classified SASP Total Primary Nonprimary National Regional Local Basic Alabama 52,419 4,779,736 98 80 75 5 70 18 25 13 14 Alaska 663,267 710,231 408 287 257 29 228 3 68 126 31 Arizona 113,998 6,392,017 79 78 58 9 49 2 10 18 14 5 Arkansas 53,179 2,915,918 99 90 77 4 73 1 11 28 12 21 California 163,696 37,253,956 255 247 191 27 164 9 47 69 19 20 Colorado 104,094 5,029,196 76 65 49 11 38 2 2 27 7 Connecticut 5,543 3,574,097 23 19 13 2 11 2 3 4 2 Delaware 2,489 897,934 11 10 4 4 1 1 1 1 Florida 65,755 18,801,310 129 125 100 19 81 9 32 28 9 3 Georgia 59,425 9,687,653 109 99 98 7 91 4 18 38 14 17 Hawaii 10,931 1,360,301 15 15 7 8 2 6 Idaho 83,570 1,567,582 119 73 37 6 31 1 16 8 6 Illinois 57,914 12,830,632 113 86 8 78 5 9 35 9 20 Indiana 36,418 6,483,802 107 68 65 4 61 1 16 32 11 1 Iowa 56,272 3,046,355 117 109 78 6 72 7 41 16 8 Kansas 82,277 2,853,118 141 134 79 4 75 10 34 18 13 Kentucky 40,409 4,339,367 60 59 55 5 50 7 21 11 11 Louisiana 51,840 4,533,372 75 67 56 7 49 9 19 7 14 Maine 35,385 1,328,361 68 36 35 5 30 2 13 7 8 Maryland 12,407 5,773,552 37 34 18 3 15 2 5 6 2 Massachusetts 10,555 6,547,629 40 38 22 22 4 5 10 3 Michigan 96,716 9,883,640 229 105 95 13 82 2 12 49 14 5 Minnesota 86,939 5,303,925 154 126 97 7 90 3 7 49 22 9 Mississippi 48,430 2,967,297 80 74 73 7 66 10 15 16 25 Missouri 69,704 5,988,927 132 111 76 4 72 2 8 33 16 13 Montana 147,042 989,415 120 114 70 7 63 1 25 33 4 Nebraska 77,354 1,826,341 85 83
    [Show full text]
  • KVLL Procedures
    (BARII2.BARII) 19227 OAKLAND/TROY(VLL) BARII TWO DEPARTURE(RNAV) AL-5293 (FAA) TROY, MICHIGAN TOP ALTITUDE: AWOS-3 119.475 ASSIGNED BY ATC CTAF 123.05 DETROIT DEP CON 134.3 284.0 276° 096° 1500 1400 TAKEOFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 9: Standard. Rwy 27: Standard with minimum climb of 476' per NM to 1500. EC-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT HUUTZ 4000 ° ) 213 55 ( NOTE:RNAV 1. NOTE:RADAR required. BARII NOTE:DME/DME/IRU or GPS required. NOTE:Turbojet departures at/above 10000, maintain 280K until advised by ATC. ° ) 10000 212 29 ( EC-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT SINKR NOTE: Chart not to scale. T DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION TAKEOFF RUNWAY 9: Climb on heading 096° to 1400 then as assigned for RADAR vectors to cross HUUTZ at or above 4000, thence.... TAKEOFF RUNWAY 27: Climb on heading 276° to 1500 then as assigned for RADAR vectors to cross HUUTZ at or above 4000, thence.... ....on track 213° to BARII, then on (transition). Maintain ATC assigned altitude, expect filed altitude 10 minutes after departure. SINKR TRANSITION (BARII2.SINKR): BARII TWO DEPARTURE(RNAV) TROY, MICHIGAN OAKLAND/TROY (VLL) (BARII2.BARII) 15AUG19 EC-1, 09 SEP 2021 to 07 OCT 2021 OCT 07 to 2021 SEP 09 EC-1, (CCOBB2.CCOBB) (CCOBB2.CCOBB) CCOBB TWODEPARTURE CCOBB TWODEPARTURE AW OS-3 TOP ALTITUDE: 119.475 ASSIGNED BY ATC CTAF 123.05 DETROIT DEP CON NOTE: RNAV 1. 134.3 284.0 NOTE: RADAR required. 096° NOTE: DME/DME/IRU or GPS required. 276° NOTE: Turbojet departures at/above 10000, 15AUG19 maintain 280K until advised by ATC.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Version December January 2014
    IDWEST FLYER M AGAZINE DECEMBER 2013/JANUARY 2014 Published For & By The Midwest Aviation Community Since 1978 midwestflyer.com Minnesota Aviation Day At The Capitol March 5, 2014 St. Paul, Minnesota You Won’t Want To Miss This Special Event! On Wednesday, March 5, 2014, the Minnesota aviation community will meet at the State Capitol to visit with their State Senators and Representatives to tell them how important aviation and their local airports are to them and to their local communities. Anyone actively involved in aviation in Minnesota, and who believes in the importance of their local airport, is encouraged to participate: Fixed Base Operators - Airport Managers - Airport Commissioners - Mayors - City Council Members Business Aircraft Owners & Operators - Corporate Flight Departments - Pilots - Aircraft Technicians Aviation Support Service Professionals The event will kickoff with a welcome continental breakfast at 9:00 a.m. in the Capitol (Room 316). * Governor Mark Dayton has been invited to address participants. At the welcome breakfast, each participant will receive a packet of materials containing handouts to be given to legislators and also suggested talking points to be discussed during their visit(s). Participants will have the opportunity to visit their State Senator and Representative(s). At Noon participants will attend a box lunch meeting in the Capitol. Legislators will be invited to attend. Hosting “Minnesota Aviation Day At The Capital” is the Minnesota Aviation Trades Association (MATA), Minnesota Business Aviation Association (MBAA) & Minnesota Council Of Airports (MCOA). In addition to attending yourself, you are encouraged to organize a “Plane Pool” or “Car Pool” of equally concerned persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Public Safety Committee
    Health and Public Safety Committee Karen Bargy Brenda Ricksgers, Chair Melissa Zelenak Minutes March 21, 2018 Members present: Brenda Ricksgers, Karen Bargy, Melissa Zelenak Members absent: Others present: Pete Garwood, Mathew Cooke, Ed Boettcher, Dawn LaVanway, Dean Pratt, Dan Bean, 1. The meeting was called to order at 9:00 a.m. by Chair Brenda Ricksgers 2. Public Comment Undersheriff Dean Pratt read a written statement (see attached pgs. 7-8) regarding the actions taken by the Sheriff’s Department during the March 10, 2018, homicide investigation. Mr. Pratt also read the following statement from a relative of the 15-year-old survivor: “I strongly feel that all the law enforcement involved including the Antrim County Sheriff Department, Kalkaska County Sheriff’s Department, Michigan State police, EMS, fire dept, Munson hospital did a great job with such a tragic situation. I am confident that law enforcement had it handled. If any of you want to do anything helpful and kind, keep all involved in your thoughts and prayers, especially for the man who passed from his injuries and his wife and family. If you don’t have anything nice or helpful to say, keep it to yourself. There is a lot of families hurting from this tragedy and I want to remind you to be kind to one another and keep in mind most posts on social media regarding this tragedy have not been accurate. I wish I had known about this meeting so I could share my thoughts. ” Jim Janisse, Antrim County Detective Sergeant, stated that he was downstate during the incident but reminded the Committee the suspect was captured within eight hours.
    [Show full text]
  • July 29, 2020
    MICHIGAN AERONAUTICS COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting Lansing, Michigan July 29, 2020 Pursuant to Section 31 of Act 327 of the Public Acts of 1945 and Executive Directive 2020- 129, the Commissioners of the Michigan Aeronautics Commission (MAC) met via video conference call, on Wednesday, July 29, 2020. Members Present Members Absent Roger Salo, Chair Brig. Gen. Bryan Teff, Designee – MDMVA Rick Fiddler, Vice Chair Dr. Brian Smith, Commissioner Russ Kavalhuna, Commissioner Kelly Burris, Commissioner Laura Mester, Designee - MDOT Kevin Jacobs, Designee – MDNR F/Lt. Brian Bahlau, Designee – MSP Mike Trout, Director Bryan Budds, Commission Advisor Alicia Morrison, Commission Assistant I. OPENING REMARKS Director Mike Trout began by explaining the meeting was being held via video conference call in accordance with Executive Directive 2020-129, enacted to allow teleconference public meetings due to the COVID-19 pandemic. He welcomed all who were participating and thanked the Commissioners for coming together, noting meeting attendance continues to increase with the new virtual format. He then turned the meeting over to Chairperson Roger Salo. The July 29, 2020 MAC meeting was officially called to order by Chair Roger Salo at 10:01 a.m. Chair Salo thanked the Commissioners and all in attendance on the call for participating. Chair Salo asked for a formal roll call. Roll call was taken. It was announced there were seven (7) Commissioners present which is a quorum. Note: Commissioner Dr. Brian Smith was not present for the roll call, however, did join the meeting and was present for the second roll call vote held. 07/29/2020 Page 1 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Aeronautics Commission Funds Under the Airport
    MICHIGAN AERONAUTICS COMMISSION January 27, 2016 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL AND TRANSFER OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS UNDER THE AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Airport Based Concept # Project Description Federal Federal State State Local Local Total Aircraft/Total Fund Fund Fund Operations Year Year Year Adrian 39 129444 Acquire Land for approaches or RPZ $1,300,000 2013 $72,222 2013 $72,223 2013 $1,444,445 Lenawee County 12,127 Rwy 23 RPZ Cadillac 56 125161 Rehabilitate Apron Terminal Design $61,830 2013 $3,435 2013 $3,435 2013 $68,700 Wexford County 8,150 Caro 50 125441 Construct Taxiway (capacity) NE $29,889 2013 $1,660 2013 $1,661 2013 $33,210 Tuscola Area 13,678 Hangar Taxiways Design Charlotte 24 122306 Construct/Exp/Imp/Rehab Building $133,141 2013 $7,397 2013 $7,397 2013 $147,935 Fitch H Beach 7,276 Hangar reimbursement #2 Construction Detroit / Grosse Ile 63 126727 Install Weather Reporting Equipment $72,000 2013 $8,000 2013 $80,000 Grosse Ile Muni 19,210 Replace AWOS components Detroit / Grosse Ile 63 129417 Wildlife Hazard Assessment Site Visit $3,600 2013 $400 2013 $4,000 Grosse Ile Muni 19,210 Dowagiac 17 129389 Acquire Land for approaches or RPZ $20,700 2013 $1,150 2013 $1,150 2013 $23,000 Dowagiac Muni 3,600 Rwy 9 (parcels E25 & E26) Dowagiac 17 129539 Construct Terminal Bldg (standards) $34,200 2013 $1,900 2013 $1,900 2013 $38,000 Dowagiac Muni 3,600 Design Hillsdale 17 129404 Install Weather Reporting Equipment $63,000 2013 $7,000 2013 $70,000 Hillsdale Muni 9,735 Replace AWOS components Howell 120 128966 Install Weather Reporting Equipment $24,300 2013 $2,700 2013 $27,000 Livingston County- 39,292 Replace AWOS Ceilometer Spencer J.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Aircraft Association Chapter 55 March 2001 Page 55
    Experimental Aircraft Association Chapter 55 March 2001 Hameed Noon Meetings are the 2nd Saturday of each Month at the Hangar, Mason Jewett Field, Breakfast at 0800, Meeting at 0900. Pres: Bill Hanna 627-4360 Vice Pres: Paul Barbour 627-3381 Treas: Gregg Cornell 351-1338 Sec: Drew Seguin 332-2601 Editor: Charley Downey 349-3903 Graphics Editor: Sue Downey displayed. Antiques, classics, home-builts: there are always Page 55 many airplanes that exhibit a level of quality and OFF TO A GOOD START One of the nice things about workmanship that no factory could ever achieve – not if the Program Team approach to our monthly Chapter they wanted to stay in business. Every year, a few are activity is they chosen as the best of the best and awarded as champions in introduce new things. their class. How do the judges make their selections, what Last month’s Team do they look for, what features and details determine the demonstrated to us that winners? This month we’ll get some insight when there is life without Chapter 55 member, Rick Duckworth, gives us a pancakes. In a bold, presentation on “Aircraft Judging.” Rick has been a judge edge of the envelop at Oshkosh for many years and will outline the process, move, the Team served standards and probably clear up some of the myth- a breakfast to the conceptions about how the winning airplanes are selected. members that tasted A MAJOR AVIATION EVENT – JUST DOWN THE great, looked good, ROAD As plans come together for the second Great plenty of calories and nary a flapjack in sight.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy 2007-08 Capital Outlay Budget Sb
    FY 2007-08 CAPITAL OUTLAY BUDGET S.B. 511 (H-9): SUMMARY AS PASSED BY THE SENATE Senate Bill 511 (H-9 as amended by the Senate) Committee: Appropriations FY 2006-07 Year-to-Date Gross Appropriation ........................................................................ $260,720,900 Changes from FY 2006-07 Year-to-Date: 1. State Building Authority (SBA) Projects. The Governor recommended $100 line item 100 authorizations for projects that would result in the issuance of $561.9 million in new State Building Authority debt. The House included the Governor's Recommendation and projects for every school that made a request, which would result in new bond obligations for the SBA totaling over $810.7 million. The Senate passed version (5/01/08) eliminated all but one SBA authorization. It involves the purchase of new space for the State Records Center. See Attachment A for details. 2. Natural Resources Trust Fund. The House and Senate included the Michigan Natural (881,900) Resources Trust Fund Board of Trustees recommendation for 31 acquisitions and 34 recreation projects. FY 2007-08 projects total $35.2 million compared to the FY 2006-07 appropriation of $36.1 million. Attachment B provides a detailed listing of FY 2007-08 projects. 3. Department of Military Affairs. Adjustments included an increase of $8,237,000 Federal (from 18,787,000 $6,763,000 to $15,000,000) for maintenance projects; $3,500,000 Federal to construct a new Army Standard Infantry Platoon Battle Course/Live Fire Range at Camp Grayling; $8,000,000 Federal for a specially designed Company Headquarters Building facility (six structures) with attached barracks and dining facilities for the Camp Grayling Army Airfield; and a reduction of $950,000 associated with one-time FY 2006-07 projects.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Supports Investment in Michigan Airports
    How the Federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Supports Investment in Michigan Airports • 89 airports in Michigan have identified $714.9 million in unfunded improvements needed over the next five years that would be eligible for AIP grants. • There are 4,429 aircraft based at these airports, with 18.2 million enplanements each year. • Over the last decade, Michigan airports have received 323 grants worth a total of $978.9 million through the AIP. • 53 percent of that funding—$516.1 million—has gone towards projects that included the construction, repair, upgrade or rehabilitation of airport runways, aprons or taxiways. AIP Grants for Michigan Airports, by FFY $140 $124.5 $118.3 $120 $104.2 $103.0 $100 $53.5 $48.3 $83.0 $78.7 $80 $52.6 $69.8 $66.8 $66.4 $69.3 $26.1 $30.2 $59.0 $60 in millions in $24.2 $37.5 $39.1 $28.8 $40 $70.0 $71.0 $51.6 $52.6 $52.8 $20 $45.6 $33.7 $29.3 $27.3 $30.2 $0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Projects that include runway, taxiway or apron repair/construction work Other projects Total AIP Grants by Type of Airport, AIP Construction-Related Grants by FFY 2007-2016 Type of Airport, FFY 2007-2016 Commercial Reliever, Commercial Service, $12.3, 3% Service, $42.2, 5% $38.3, 8% Other, $255.3, 29% Primary, $561.2, 64% Primary, Reliever, $413.6, 89% $15.1, 2% © 2017 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Aeronautics Commission
    Michigan Aeronautics Commission Wednesday, March 28, 2018 – 10:00 a.m. Aeronautics Auditorium 2700 Port Lansing Road, Lansing, Michigan I. OPENING REMARKS AND THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman Dave VanderVeen II. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. Minutes of the January 25, 2018 Meeting B. Request for Approval and Transfer of Appropriated Funds – Elyse Lower Air Service Program Grants 1. Alpena County Regional Airport, Alpena 2. Willow Run Airport, Detroit 3. Delta County Airport, Escanaba 4. Bishop International Airport, Flint 5. Gerald R. Ford International Airport, Grand Rapids 6. Houghton County Memorial, Hancock 7. Ford Airport, Iron Mountain Kingsford 8. Gogebic Iron County Airport, Ironwood 9. Kalamazoo/Battle Creek International, Kalamazoo 10. Capital Region International, Lansing 11. Manistee County – Blacker, Manistee 12. Sawyer International, Marquette 13. Muskegon County Airport, Muskegon 14. Pellston Regional Airport of Emmet County, Pellston 15. Chippewa County International Airport, Sault Ste. Marie 16. Cherry Capital Airport, Traverse City Airport Sponsor Contracts 1. Antrim County Airport, Bellaire 2. Wexford County Airport, Cadillac 3. Fitch H. Beach Municipal, Charlotte 4. Branch County Memorial, Coldwater 5. Dowagiac Municipal Airport, Dowagiac 6. Frankfort Dow Memorial Field, Frankfort 7. Gladwin Zettel Municipal, Gladwin 8. Abrams Municipal Airport, Grand Ledge 9. Greenville Municipal Airport, Greenville 10. Greenville Municipal Airport, Greenville 11. Oceana County Airport, Hart/Shelby 12. Oceana County Airport, Hart/Shelby 13. Lakeview - Griffith Field, Lakeview 14. Mason County Airport, Ludington 15. Mason County Airport, Ludington 16. Manistee County – Blacker, Manistee 17. Marlette Township Airport, Marlette 18. Marlette Township Airport, Marlette 19. Marlette Township Airport, Marlette 20. Luce County Airport, Newberry 21. Presque Isle County, Rogers City 22.
    [Show full text]