DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing the Economic Returns of Engineering Research and Postgraduate Training in the UK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing the Economic Returns of Engineering Research and Postgraduate Training in the UK March 2015 Assessing the economic returns of engineering research and postgraduate training in the UK Final report www.technopolis-group.com Assessing the economic returns of engineering research and postgraduate training in the UK Final report technopolis |group|, March, 2015 Cristina Rosemberg, Paul Simmonds, Xavier Potau, Kristine Farla, Tammy Sharp, Martin Wain, Oliver Cassagneau-Francis and Helena Kovacs Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 4 2.1 Scope of the study 4 2.2 Defining engineering 4 3. Engineering contribution to the UK economy 6 3.1 Engineering contribution to the UK economy 6 3.1.1 Engineers are present across all economic sectors 6 3.1.2 Pervasiveness translates into a high contribution to UK GVA 8 3.2 Engineers as drivers of innovation and competitiveness 10 3.2.1 Engineers are highly valued by the labour market 10 3.2.2 High concentrations of engineers are linked with high levels of innovation10 3.2.3 Higher innovation and productivity leads to higher competitiveness 13 3.3 Engineers produce high quality research 14 3.3.1 The UK produces world leading engineering research 14 3.3.2 The UK has numerous engineering-related centres of excellence 17 3.3.3 This academic excellence translates into tangible economic benefits 19 3.3.4 Engineering research attracts inward investments 26 4. Engineering’s contributions to policy and public services 28 4.1 Engineers are crucial to the operation of many areas of government 28 4.2 Engineering research plays a key role in policy and public services 30 5. Investment in engineering research and training 32 5.1 Engineering research is strongly aligned with UK industrial strategy 32 5.1.1 Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council 33 5.1.2 BIS and Innovate UK 36 5.1.3 Ministry of Defence (MoD) 40 5.2 Industry is also a heavy funder of engineering research 41 5.3 International comparisons 42 5.4 Private and public investments in engineering training 44 5.4.1 Public investment in engineering training 44 5.4.2 UK Industry invests heavily in engineering training 45 6. Final remarks 48 Appendix A : Case studies 49 Appendix B : Estimating economic impact 75 Appendix C : Text mining of REF case studies 78 Assessing the economic returns of engineering research and postgraduate training in the UK i Table of Figures Figure 1 – Distribution of engineers throughout the UK economy ................................ 6 Figure 2 – Number of R&D personnel employed, by sector (000s in FTEs) .................. 7 Figure 3 – GVA of engineering related sectors ................................................................ 9 Figure 4 – Number of companies in the UK, by employment size band ....................... 10 Figure 5 – Distribution of skills across broad economic sectors ................................... 11 Figure 6 – Enterprises engaging in innovation (%) by broad sector ............................. 12 Figure 7 – Labour productivity and concentration of graduate engineers .................... 13 Figure 8 – Percentage of enterprises exporting (%), by broad sector ........................... 14 Figure 9 – Quality profile research outputs: RAE2008 versus REF2014 ..................... 15 Figure 10 – Field-weighted citation impact ................................................................... 16 Figure 11 – UK Participation in Fp7 (selected thematic areas) ...................................... 16 Figure 12 - European Research Council: Number of grants in the area of ‘Engineering and Physical Sciences’ (2007-2013) ............................................................................... 17 Figure 13 – Selected examples of notable innovations, by strategic sector .................. 20 Figure 14 – Distribution of specific sectors cited in REF Impact Case Studies ............. 21 Figure 15 – Engineering REF Case Studies across types of impacts ............................. 22 Figure 16 – Top 50 organisations in REF case studies, by number of citations ........... 25 Figure 17 – Top 10 areas supported by EPSRC where engineering research is a key component part .............................................................................................................. 34 Figure 18 – EPSRC grants and fellowships in engineering departments (active portfolio 2014) – strategic technology areas and sectors .............................................. 35 Figure 19 – Innovate UK Investments ............................................................................ 37 Figure 20 – Innovate UK investments relating to engineering (forecast expenditure 2014/15) .......................................................................................................................... 37 Figure 21 – Employment and expenditure in R&D, performed in UK businesses (2012) ........................................................................................................................................ 42 Figure 22 – Sectoral R&D expenditure as a share of all BERD, for selected countries 44 Figure 23 – Changing Composition of Employment by Occupation, 1992-2022 ......... 47 Figure 24 – Engineering research contributions to the construction sector ................. 55 Figure 25 - Main thematic fields in selected REF ‘healthcare’ impact case studies ..…68 Figure 26 - Information on SIC codes ............................................................................ 75 Figure 27 - REF impact case studies: analytical framework …………………………………..78 Figure 28 – Number of Engineering REF Case Studies per institution (frequency) .... 79 Figure 29 – Number of received engineering impact REF Case Studies per UoA ....... 80 ii Assessing the economic returns of engineering research and postgraduate training in the UK Table of Boxes Box 1: Competitiveness and productivity ....................................................................... 22 Box 2: New economic activity ......................................................................................... 23 Box 3: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) .................... 29 Box 4: Better provision of public services ...................................................................... 30 Box 5: Innovate UK leading the manufacturing revolution ........................................... 40 Box 6: The Quantum Technology Partnership ............................................................... 40 Assessing the economic returns of engineering research and postgraduate training in the UK iii 1. Executive Summary The study This report provides quantitative and qualitative estimates of the economic impact of the UK’s investment in engineering research and post-graduate training, across the economy overall and where possible distinguishing contributions to different sectors and areas of activity. It was prepared by Technopolis with the close support of the EPSRC and the Royal Academy of Engineering, and overseen by a project steering committee chaired by Professor John Fisher CBE FREng. Engineering is pervasive and highly dynamic • Engineers are a pervasive force across any modern economy, with engineering research driving innovation and improved professional practice in almost every economic sector, from advanced manufacturing to software, from financial services through to the media and government. • There are around 450,000 engineers with graduate and postgraduate degrees (Level 4+) working in the UK, comprising 60% of all professional engineers nationally. Highly qualified engineers are distributed throughout the economy, which reflects the universal relevance of engineering skills, from numeracy to critical thinking, from design to communications. • Engineering graduates and especially postgraduates provide the social networks, skills and absorptive capacity to not only ‘do first-rate engineering,’ but also to drive business development more generally; in most parts of the economy, engineers can be found at the heart of almost any new product development initiative. • Engineering research and training have been critical to the profession’s ability to evolve in response to changing industrial needs and composition, reflecting the dynamic nature of the discipline and the people. What was understood as ‘engineering’ 20 years ago has changed dramatically today, with a broadening of the application of engineering and engineers in the new economy and a changing emphasis on key emerging technologies even within the more ‘traditional’ engineering sectors. This translates into a substantial contribution to UK economic output • Engineering contributed an estimated £280 billion in gross value added (GVA) in 2011, which is 20% of the total UK GVA, and back to the levels last seen in 2007, before the economic crisis1. The estimate includes the economic output of both the more ‘obvious’ engineering-related sectors of the economy, such as aerospace, and a share of the output of several other ‘less obvious’ sectors that employ significant numbers of highly-qualified engineers, including for example, knowledge intensive business services (e.g. advertising, management consultancy), health and finance. • Engineering qualifications attract an additional wage premium on average in comparison with the average for other scientific disciplines, estimated to be around 15% of the median salary for newly qualified graduates, which is a clear indication that engineers’ skills are highly valued in the economy. High concentrations of engineers are linked with innovation and competitiveness • Analysis of the UK Innovation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Priorities 2017–2030: Reissued 2020
    INSPIRING FUTURES STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 2017–2030: REISSUED 2020 INSPIRING FUTURES: STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 2017–2030: REISSUED 2020 INSPIRING FUTURES: STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 2017–2030: REISSUED 2020 CONTENTS Note on 2020 reissue PREFACE 4 This long-term strategy was first published in 2017 as the culmination of FOREWORD 6 a rigorous process that began in 2015. It is a living document and the need for INTRODUCTION 8 review and adaptation before 2030 was acknowledged from the start. A formal STRATEGIC PRIORITIES commitment to review the strategic priorities after no less than five years is built in (p12) and will fall in 2022. But Rising priorities at 2020 12 the progress we have already made in realising our mission to inspire futures, Grow science capital in 16 and the fast pace of change within the individuals and society Group and the external environment, have led us to this interim review and Grow our audiences and 20 refresh of the original document. exceed their expectations Inspiring Futures was always conceived as an overarching framework, not Sustain and grow our 24 a straitjacket. It continues to be a world-class collection touchstone for our planning and activities, with a focus on the seven Extend our international reach 28 strategic priorities. In refreshing the document for this edition, we have Transform our estate 33 kept changes to a minimum. Mostly, changes are updating, as follows: Harness the potential of digital 36 - Changes to titles of people, organisations and initiatives Increase income 39 - Revision of numbers and data, where more recent data was MONITORING PROGRESS 42 available, including the information boxes containing charts, tables and lists in each strategic priority section - Addition of some recent activity and plans In addition, we are addressing other significant areas that have moved up the Group’s agenda since 2017 and that we anticipate will be more comprehensively articulated in the next phase of Inspiring Futures from 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan 2018-21 Introduction
    UK Shared Business Services Ltd Business Plan 2018-21 Introduction For the last three years UK SBS has been working to single year business plans, following a decision taken by owners in 2015 that would have seen the transfer of services to other providers and the closure of the company. I am therefore delighted to be writing the introduction to a business plan that takes us beyond the planned closure date and without any more reference to closure. After two years of uncertainty, in July 2017, our owners made the decision to continue to share services through UK SBS and jointly invest in a new system solution for implementation in 2020-21. The fact that UK SBS was re-considered as a credible option was only possible because of the hard work and dedication of our people that turned the company around; the last three years have seen performance move from 40% of targets met to consistently meeting over 95%, alongside a reduction in our cost base of around 40%. Despite these significant improvements we are not complacent and recognise that there is more to do, but our people have proved that what they do and the way they do it can influence decisions and their future, and this is a powerful message to take forward in an ever uncertain world. The creation of BEIS and UKRI mean that we will have two strong owners and an opportunity to better enable joint control with a healthy degree of challenge for all of us. Both owners face their own considerable change over the next few years – change we will be happy and proud to support and enable.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovate-UK-Energy-Catalyst-Round-4-Directory-Of-Projects
    Directory of projects Energy Catalyst – Round 4 1 Introduction Energy markets around the world – private and public, household and industry, developed and developing – are all looking for solutions to the same problem: how to provide a resilient energy system that delivers affordable and clean energy with access for all. Solving this trilemma requires innovation and collaboration on an international scale and UK businesses and researchers are at the forefront of addressing the energy revolution. Innovate UK is the UK’s innovation agency. We work with business, policy-makers and the research base to help support the development of new ideas, technologies, products and services, and to help companies de-risk their innovations as they journey towards commercialisation and business growth. The Energy Catalyst was established as a national open competition, run by Innovate UK and co-funded with the Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) and the Department for International Development (DFID). Since 2013, the Energy Catalyst has invested almost £100m in grant funding across more than 750 organisations and 250 projects. The Energy Catalyst exists to accelerate development, commercialisation and deployment of the very best of UK energy technology and business innovation. Support from the Energy Catalyst has enabled many companies to validate their technology and business propositions, to forge key supply-chain partnerships, to accelerate their growth and to secure investment for the next stages of their business development. Affordable access to clean and reliable energy supplies is a key requirement for sustainable and inclusive economic growth. With funding through DFID’s “Transforming Energy Access” programme, the Energy Catalyst is helping UK energy innovators to forge new international partnerships, and directly address the energy access needs of poor households, communities and enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • PLACE MATTERS Innovation & Growth in the UK 03
    PLACE MATTERS Innovation & growth in the UK 03 FOREWORD We commissioned this report at a crucial moment for the UK. With a new This report is addressed both to local and civic leaders, and to central Government and Prime Minister, and as we exited the EU, we knew this was Government and its institutions who lead on innovation policy. It is about how we the right time to focus on innovation in our economy. Over the last decade, begin to improve the UK’s innovation performance from the ground up. To local productivity growth in the UK has lagged behind other countries, and the gap Government, businesses and institutions in places, we ask that you take a hard between our cities and the innovation hubs of the rest of the world has grown. look at where you currently are and what you want to achieve in innovation, using This report argues this is due to a failure to balance innovative activity across the the checklist of recommendations to start. country, even as our science base has remained globally leading. Many of our cities led the global economy’s first modern leap in productivity – they should Our new Government has made clear that its priority is the levelling up of all parts participate in the next. It is a timely diagnosis of where innovation is flourishing, of our economy: this will be impossible without a better distribution of innovation. where it is being held back, and presents the beginnings of a plan to unleash it. Business-as-usual is not good enough, and if we repeat what we have done in the past, the potential of our places will remain untapped.
    [Show full text]
  • Students Take Control of Imperial's New Carbon Capture Pilot Plant → Centre
    Issue 246 ▸ 3 May 2012 reporterSharing stories of Imperial’s community In charge Students take control of Imperial’s new carbon capture pilot plant → centre pages MADAME LIU MATHS MAN BIG SPLASH YANDONG Professor Staff member Chinese State Richard Craster to canoe the Councillor visits on his first six length of the the College months as HoD Thames PAGE 3 PAGE 10 PAGE 13 2 >> newsupdate www.imperial.ac.uk/reporter | reporter | 3 May 2012 • Issue 246 Future of microsurgery unveiled Sir Paul Nurse, President of the Royal Society, officially opened Imperial’s newly refurbished Hamlyn Centre on 16 April. Guests were able to see the EDITOR’S CORNER latest developments in robot assisted microsurgery – minimally invasive sur- gery with micro-scale imaging and manipulation – made possible by funding totalling £5 million from the Wolfson Foundation and the National Institute for Open house Health Research (NIHR) underpinned by the Helen Hamlyn Trust endowment. The Hamlyn Centre, which is split across three Imperial campuses – Hamlyn Centre in advancing robot South Kensington, St Mary’s and Northwick Park – has been refurbished with assisted microsurgery.” From tackling malaria to cutting edge new technologies and a pre-clinical imaging suite for clinical tri- Lord Darzi, Chair of the Institute creating spray-on clothes als to enable clinicians and technicians to validate new surgical robots in the and co-director of the Hamlyn – conveying the amazing patient. The long-term hope is that the robots in the Hamlyn Centre will be Centre, said: “The new facilities breadth of work that goes integrated with imaging and sensing technologies to perform microsurgery, will allow us to build on our unique on at Imperial to family and for example, on cancerous cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Priorities for Our Future Economy and Society
    1 Engineering priorities for our future economy and society Engineering priorities for our future economy and society | Skills page 2 Implement the recommendations of the Perkins Review to secure the engineering skills needed for the future. | Innovation page 3 Increase Innovate UK’s budget to boost support for business innovation and the ‘D’ of R&D to increase productivity. | Digital page 4 Deliver fast and resilient digital infrastructure, a thriving business environment, excellent digital skills and a diverse pipeline of workers to create a world-leading digital economy. | Infrastructure page 5 Deliver on the recommendations of the National Infrastructure Assessment or set out alternative plans to meet the UK’s long-term infrastructure needs. | Energy and climate change page 6 Deliver on the UK’s ambitious climate change goals by investing in demonstration and deployment of new low-carbon heat, charging of electric vehicles and carbon capture and storage technologies. The UK faces a number of defining challenges to its Most of these big challenges are long term in nature and prosperity, security and wellbeing. Navigating these require cross-government action. Engineering is central to challenges will require making trade-offs and dealing with delivering on them. uncertainties in the face of these escalating pressures with Here, we set out our priorities for upcoming policy and limited resources. spending decisions in the UK. The actions we propose will Engineers have the skills, insights and ingenuity to help enable the UK to make investment decisions that will create tackle many of these challenges in ways that optimise more jobs and prosperity, and meet the future needs of our efficiency, economy, safety and reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Physics Review
    The Blackett Laboratory Department of Physics Review Faculty of Natural Sciences 2008/09 Contents Preface from the Head of Department 2 Undergraduate Teaching 54 Academic Staff group photograph 9 Postgraduate Studies 59 General Departmental Information 10 PhD degrees awarded (by research group) 61 Research Groups 11 Research Grants Grants obtained by research group 64 Astrophysics 12 Technical Development, Intellectual Property 69 and Commercial Interactions (by research group) Condensed Matter Theory 17 Academic Staff 72 Experimental Solid State 20 Administrative and Support Staff 76 High Energy Physics 25 Optics - Laser Consortium 30 Optics - Photonics 33 Optics - Quantum Optics and Laser Science 41 Plasma Physics 38 Space and Atmospheric Physics 45 Theoretical Physics 49 Front cover: Laser probing images of jet propagating in ambient plasma and a density map from a 3D simulation of a nested, stainless steel, wire array experiment - see Plamsa Physics group page 38. 1 Preface from the Heads of Department During 2008 much of the headline were invited by, Ian Pearson MP, the within the IOP Juno code of practice grabbing news focused on ‘big science’ Minister of State for Science and (available to download at with serious financial problems at the Innovation, to initiate a broad ranging www.ioppublishing.com/activity/diver Science and Technology Facilities review of physics research under sity/Gender/Juno_code_of_practice/ Council (STFC) (we note that some the chairmanship of Professor Bill page_31619.html). As noted in the 40% of the Department’s research Wakeham (Vice-Chancellor of IOP document, “The code … sets expenditure is STFC derived) and Southampton University). The stated out practical ideas for actions that the start-up of the Large Hadron purpose of the review was to examine departments can take to address the Collider at CERN.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry for All Reducing Inequalities in Chemistry Aspirations and Attitudes
    Chemistry for All Reducing inequalities in chemistry aspirations and attitudes Institute of Education 2 Chemistry for All Reducing inequalities in chemistry aspirations and attitudes Findings from the Chemistry for All research and evaluation programme November 2020 Authors Dr Tamjid Mujtaba Dr Richard Sheldrake Professor Michael J. Reiss UCL Institute of Education, University College London Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the students and staff from across the participating schools. The authors would also like to thank the Chemistry for All programme delivery teams and members of the programme steering group. The research was conducted independently by the UCL Institute of Education with funding from the Royal Society of Chemistry. For further information For further information on the Chemistry for All project, including requests for related publications or the next phase of the work, please contact Dr Tamjid Mujtaba ([email protected]). 3 1. Executive summary 5 9.3. Results for science as of Year 11 82 1.1. Background and context 6 9.3.1. Predicting students’ science aspirations 1.2. Chemistry for All programme 7 (A-Level, university, jobs) as of Year 11 82 1.3. Research and evaluation programme 7 9.3.2. Predicting students’ science aspirations for A-Level as of Year 11 85 CONTENTS 1.4. Research results and insights 8 1.4.1. Insights into students’ changing attitudes and aspirations 8 9.3.3. Predicting students’ science aspirations for careers as of Year 11 86 1.4.2. Insights into students’ attitudes and views 9 9.3.4. Predicting students’ science aspirations for university 1.4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Powerhouse for the West July 2019
    Great Western Powerhouse March 2019 A Powerhouse for the West July 2019 3 Waterhouse Square Elliot House 138 Holborn 151 Deansgate London EC1N 2SW Manchester M3 3WD 020 3868 3085 0161 393 4364 Designed by Bristol City Council, Bristol Design July 19 BD11976 Great Western Powerhouse March 2019 A Powerhouse for the West July 2019 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 THE UK POLICY CONTEXT 8 DEVOLUTION AND THE EMERGING REGIONAL DIMENSION TO UK ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL POLICY 10 INTERNATIONAL MODELS OF CROSS-BORDER COLLABORATION 15 GREAT WESTERN POWERHOUSE GEOGRAPHY 18 ECONOMIC STRENGTHS AND OPPORTUNITIES 30 WHAT THE GREAT WESTERN POWERHOUSE SHOULD BE AIMING TO ACHIEVE 44 c 1 A Powerhouse for the West July 2019 A Powerhouse for the West July 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The economic map of Britain is being reshaped by devolution and the • The Northern Powerhouse and the Midlands The economic geography emergence of regional powerhouses that can drive inclusive growth at scale, Engine have established themselves as formidable regional groupings driving economic The inner core of the region is the cross-border through regional collaboration But, there is a missing piece of the jigsaw in rebalancing and promoting trade and economic relationship between the two metro regions the West of Britain along the M4 from Swindon across the Welsh Border to investment through the internationalisation of of the West of England Region (including Bristol and Swansea, and the intersecting M5 axis, through Bristol, north to Tewkesbury their regions These powerhouses have been
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Electronics Interfaces, Heterojunctions and Semiconductor Device Engineering
    Organic electronics: interfaces, heterojunctions and semiconductor device engineering" Richard Friend Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge Ras Al Khaimah February 22, 2009 PPV: the H H Delocalised π- prototypical H H H electrons provide semiconducting H H H H both conduction polymer: H H H and valence bands H H H H H H Solutions of a range of semiconducting polymers: Polymer Light-Emitting Diodes poly(p-phenylenevinylene) aluminium, magnesium or calcium indium/tin n oxide External Circuit glass substrate Burroughes et al. Nature, 347, 539 (1990), US patent 5,247,190 1992 - foundation of Cambridge Display Technology, CDT How to pattern the red, green and blue pixels: direct printing Inkjet Deposition Process: • Polymer deposition by ink-jet printing Direct patterning deposition Printed Polymer in Bank Holes Non-contact printing Minimum material P-OLED Display Prototypes Full color prototype displays from 0.28” to 40” demonstrated 0.28” Micro-displays on Si Larger displays on a-Si or LTPS active matrix backplanes 13” 40” Molecules or Polymers? Molecular semiconductors: Polymers Single crystals – fragile! Solution processing – excellent film-forming properties Vacuum-sublimed thin films – non- crystalline structures can give Disorder inherent – limits uniform and stable structures semiconductor mobilities Stacked structures and Multilayer structures are hard to demonstration of clean make (orthogonal solvents or heterojunctions: breakthrough by cross-linking chemistry needed) Ching Tang, Kodak (1987) Novel architectures – distributed- heterojunctions good for solar cells Sony launched an ultra-thin, flat, OLED-based TV in December XEL-1 Technical specifications 2007. Called the XEL-1, the 11- Pixel resolution QHD (960H x 540V) inch OLED TV has a thickness of just 3mm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for a Gender Lens in STEM THROUGH BOTH Eyes: the Case for a Gender Lens in STEM ‘Think of a Gender Lens As Putting on Spectacles
    THE CASE FOR A GENDER LENS IN STEM THROUGH BOTH eyes: The case for a gender lens in STEM ‘Think of a gender lens as putting on spectacles. Out of one lens of the spectacles, you see the participation, needs and realities of women. Out of the other lens, you see the participation, needs and realities of men. Your sight or vision is the combination of what each eye sees.’ 2 contents Contents EXECUTive summary 4 1.0 introduction 7 2.0 Challenges 8 3.0 Solutions 23 Sir Peter Luff MP: A Call to Action 49 References 50 Authorship & Credits 51 ‘The country urgently needs more young people with STEM qualifications, which means we have to get more girls and women involved. This should be at the heart of education and skills policy – it isn’t an optional extra left to a few passionate enthusiasts. We have to make it everyone’s business’ Helen Wollaston, Director WISE ‘Our research shows that it is harder for girls to balance, or reconcile, their interest in science with femininity. The solution won’t lie in trying to change girls. The causes are rooted in, and perpetuated by, wider societal attitudes and social structures. We also need to think about the whole structure of our education system in England, which essentially channels children into narrow ‘tracks’ from a young age’ Professor Louise Archer, Director of ASPIRES, ‘The lack of girls and women in STEM blights lead coordinatior of TISME our society and our economy. There is no single solution, which is why I am glad to see that Sciencegrrl have come forward with a wide range of recommendations covering education, careers and the broader cultural challenges’ Chi Onwurah, MP for Newcastle upon Tyne ‘We are working to maximise employer engagement to help put science and maths in a careers context.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering UK 2020 Report
    Engineering UK 2020 Educational pathways into engineering Engineering UK 2020 Foreword Educational pathways into engineering Authors EngineeringUK would like to express sincere A central part of EngineeringUK’s work is to provide educators, policy-makers, industrialists and others with the most gratitude and special thanks to the following up-to-date analyses and insight. Since 2005, our EngineeringUK State of Engineering report has portrayed the breadth of Luke Armitage the sector, how it is changing and who is working within it, as well as quantifying students on educational pathways into Senior Research Analyst, EngineeringUK individuals, who contributed thought pieces or engineering and considering whether they will meet future workforce needs. Despite numerous changes of government Mollie Bourne acted as critical readers for this report: and educational policy, the 2008 recession and the advent of Brexit, the need for the UK to respond to the COVID-19 Research and Impact Manager, EngineeringUK Amanda Dickins pandemic has provided the most uncertain and challenging context to date for our research. Jess Di Simone Head of Impact and Development, STEM Learning Research Officer, EngineeringUK Teresa Frith Anna Jones Senior Skills Policy Manager, Association of Colleges Research Officer, EngineeringUK Ruth Gilligan Stephanie Neave Assistant Director for Equality Charters, AdvanceHE Our analyses for this report started before the pandemic • Ambitious plans to expand technical education are heavily Head of Research, EngineeringUK began. In light of the current and rapidly changing educational reliant on employers and may not have considered the Aimee Higgins environment, EngineeringUK has not sought to update our specific requirements of engineering. It will be even harder to Director of Employers and Partnerships, The Careers & findings.
    [Show full text]