DOCSLIB.ORG

The Economic Contributions of Wmas in Georgia 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Economic Contributions of Wmas in Georgia 2013 The Economic Contributions of Georgia’s Wildlife Management Areas in 2013: A statewide and county-level analysis For: Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Resources Division By: Southwick Associates, Inc. & Responsive Management August 2014 PO Box 6435 Fernandina Beach, FL 32035 Tel (904) 277-9765 Executive Summary The economy associated with outdoor recreation can be a powerful economic engine for communities across the nation, generating additional spending, supporting and creating jobs, and building future investments in open spaces and recreational areas. Wildlife Management Areas play an integral part in those outdoor recreational opportunities. Georgia’s Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Resources Division commissioned a study of the state’s Wildlife Management Areas (WMA) to estimate county-level and statewide activity and to determine the contribution that visitation activity makes to the state’s economy. It is important to note that this analysis is not reflective of total visitation, rather utilization by a target user group of sportsmen in 2013. Drawing from license sales records of hunters with WMA privileges and Georgia Outdoor Recreation Pass (GORP) holders and survey-based data, this report presents economic contributions based on retail spending in Georgia attributable to outdoor recreation at WMAs in the state. The study also quantifies the total economic contributions for each county. Findings show that direct retail spending by this targeted group of visitors to Georgia’s WMAs supports more than 3,700 jobs, generating labor income of $118 million dollars. An estimated $206 million is contributed to the state’s GDP and $60 million in tax revenue is generated. The direct expenditures made by these WMA visitors cycles through the local economy generating additional rounds of spending driven by businesses who provide supporting services and goods to WMA-related recreation. The indirect and induced (aka “multiplier”) effects spurred by the initial spending supports an additional 2,200 jobs, generating $98 million in labor income. These multiplier effects contribute $177 million to the state’s GPD and generate $38 million in tax revenue. And collectively, spending supports more than 5,900 full and part-time jobs, generating labor income of more than $217 million. More than $382 million is contributed to the state’s GDP and $98 million in state, local, and federal tax revenues is generated. Table E 1. Economic contributions associated with spending by target WMA visitor group Tax Revenues Jobs Labor Income State GDP State & local Federal Direct Effect 3,768 $118,541,809 $205,586,786 $29,435,894 $30,300,556 Multiplier Effect 2,188 $98,190,554 $177,272,053 $14,530,097 $23,473,863 Total Effect 5,955 $216,732,363 $382,858,840 $43,965,991 $53,774,419 ii Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 4 Participation ................................................................................................................................ 4 Spending ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Economic contributions ............................................................................................................... 5 Findings .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Activity ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Visitor spending......................................................................................................................... 11 Economic contributions ............................................................................................................. 16 Public Fishing Area activity ....................................................................................................... 21 WMA importance to outdoor recreation .................................................................................. 21 GORP and WMA license awareness and attitudes ................................................................... 24 Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Appendix A: Spending profiles by selected activities .............................................................. 29 Appendix B: Average days per participant for each activity .................................................... 33 Appendix C: Percent of expenditures spent Near Home vs. Near WMA for each item .......... 34 Appendix D: Methodology for estimating economic contributions ........................................ 35 Appendix E: Explanation of Economic Contribution ................................................................ 36 Appendix F: Economic contributions of WMA lands in Georgia: Phone survey outline .......... 38 iii List of tables Table 1. Size of target WMA user population and survey respondent group.......................... 2 Table 2. Survey respondent sample and WMA utilization rates by age category ................... 3 Table 3. Wildlife Management Area visitation by activity ........................................................ 7 Table 4. Hunting by Species in WMAs ........................................................................................ 8 Table 5. Estimated WMA visitation ............................................................................................. 8 Table 6. Estimated spending by selected WMA visitor group: statewide and by county ..... 12 Table 7. Economic contributions associated with Georgia’s WMAs ...................................... 16 Table 8 . Total economic contributions associated with spending by target visitor group: statewide and by county ........................................................................................ 17 Table 9. Public Fishing Area and Wildlife Management Area visitation by GORP holders .. 21 Table 10. Declines in participation in the event of complete WMA closure .......................... 23 Table 11. Satisfaction with selected characteristics of visitor experience at WMAs ............ 24 Table 12. Summary of WMA visitation related expenditures and economic contributions in Georgia .................................................................................................................... 27 Table 13. Total economic contributions associated with Georgia WMAs. ............................ 27 Table A 1. Boating recreation spending per participant per day ........................................... 29 Table A 2. Camping recreation spending per participant per day ......................................... 29 Table A 3. Fishing recreation spending per participant per day ............................................ 30 Table A 4. Hiking recreation spending per participant per day ............................................. 30 Table A 5. Hunting recreation spending per participant per day ........................................... 31 Table A 6. Picnic recreation spending per participant per day .............................................. 31 Table A 7. Target shooting spending per participant per day ................................................ 32 Table A 8. Wildlife watching spending per participant per day ............................................. 32 Table A 9. Average days per participant for each activity ...................................................... 33 Table A 10. Percent of expenditures spent near home vs. near WMA for each item ............ 34 List of Figures Figure 1. Change in recreational behavior if a particular WMA was no longer available .... 22 Figure 2. Change in recreational behavior if all WMAs were no longer available ................ 22 Figure 3. Change in spending if all WMAs were no longer available ..................................... 23 Figure 4. Awareness of the GORP to use selected WMAs ........................................................ 25 Figure 5. Opinion about requirement of GORP or WMA license for uses other than hunting on selected WMAs .................................................................................................. 25 Figure 6. Opinion about expanding GORP program to include additional WMA lands ........ 26 iv Introduction This study was undertaken to quantify the total economic contributions of recreational visits to Wildlife Management Areas (WMA) maintained by Georgia’s Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Resources Division (WRD). The user group included in this study includes hunting license holders with WMA privileges or Georgia Outdoor Recreation Pass (GORP) holders. Statewide and county-level contributions associated with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 678.973.2437 770.493.8862 AAS Goes to Colombia
    April 2010 Volume XXXVI, Issue 4 ATLANTA AUDUBON SOCIETY AAS Goes to Colombia INSIDE By Ted Reissing GOS Guided Tour..................2 Now that the narco-terrorists have been brought under control, birders are flocking back to Colombia. First Time Birders ................2 With almost 10% of the world’s bird species (more than twice as many as can be found in the entire U.S.) and about 75 endemics, this country is a natural target for listers. In addition, the top bird Annual Report ......................3 conservation group in the country, ProAves, has developed a series of 15 preserves to protect specific birds and created lodging facilities to house visitors. Because of all these developments, AAS put Field Notes - January ..........4 together a trip to do some serious birding in Colombia and the results of this outing are highlighted Field Trips.............................5 here. Delta flies directly from Atlanta to Bogotá daily and the four-hour A Million Thanks..................6 flight arrives just after 9 PM (there is no time change when we are on standard time). If you do start in Colombia’s capital city, an Volunteer Opportunities.......6 early morning visit to a local park can reveal eight to 10 good lifers Conservation Days...............6 including the endemic Bogotá Rail. From there it is usually about an eight-hour motor trip to one of the major preserves. For this tour Merritt Island.......................7 we chose El Paujil, the prime site for the critically endangered Blue-billed Curassow. Very few outsiders have seen this bird in the Bird Journal ........................7 wild, but after a couple of days of climbing steep trails in 95°F and Blue-billed Curassow Sculpting Birds....................8 Photographer: ProAves 90% humidity, we were fortunate to see two birds that flew directly over our heads.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Indicator Species Population and Habitat Trends
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Management Indicator Species Southern Region Population and Habitat Trends Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests Revised and Updated May 2003 i CONTENTS Page Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 Documentation of Management Indicator Species Selection ......................................... 1 Management Indicator Species Habitat Relationships............................................. 8 Forestwide Management Indicator Species Habitat Monitoring and Evaluation ............. 10 Forestwide Management Indicator Species Population Trend Monitoring and Evaluation ....................................................................................................................... 13 White-tailed Deer.......................................................................................................... 15 Black Bear..................................................................................................................... 19 Eastern Wild Turkey..................................................................................................... 23 Ruffed Grouse............................................................................................................... 27 Bobwhite Quail ............................................................................................................. 31 Gray Squirrel................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From the Field March - May 2011
    vol. 76 • 1 – 2 THE ORIOLE 37 FROM THE FIELD MARCH - MAY 2011 Note: The appearance of observations in this section does not suggest verification or acceptance of a record. Observations of “Review Species” need to be documented and a rare bird report submitted to the Georgia Checklist and Records Committee (GCRC) for consideration. Temperatures throughout the period remained slightly above average, with some notable extremes including a record March temperature of 90 ºF in Brunswick on the 22nd, the lowest May temperature since 1945 of 37 ºF in Athens on the 5th, and a record May high of 104 ºF in Waycross on the 23rd. Precipitation was equally variable across the state, with the north receiving 200-300% of the average rainfall for March and April, less than 25% of the average in the east for April, and less than 10% of the norm in the southwest. It was a record season for tornadoes, causing widespread damage, power outages, and at least 35 deaths. The storm system on 26-28 April may have been responsible for the appearance of a late inland White-winged Scoter in Columbus, and a string of interesting sightings at Lake Lanier including 2 Pacific Loons, a Laughing Gull, and 2 Caspian Terns. Abbreviations: ACOGB - Annotated Checklist of Georgia Birds, 2003, Beaton, G. et al., GOS Occ. Publ. No. 14; AIC - Andrews Island Causeway and spoil site, Glynn Co.; AP - American Proteins settling ponds, Forsyth Co.; AWMA - Altamaha Waterfowl Management Area, McIntosh Co.; BCL - Bartow Co. Loop, a cluster of sod farms, plus cattle ponds on Brandon Farm Road and Taff Road, west of Cartersville, Bartow Co.; BUENWR - Bradley Unit of the Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge, Stewart Co.; CBC - Christmas Bird Count; CINS - Cumberland Island National Seashore, Camden Co.; CLRL - Carter’s Lake Re-regulation Lake area, Murray Co.; COP - Centennial Olympic Park, Fulton Co.; CRNRA - Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area; CSU - Cochran Shoals Unit of the CRNRA, Cobb Co.; ELHLAF - E.L.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Field August·Novem Ber 2013
    62 THEORJOLE vol. 78 • 1- 4 FROM THE FIELD AUGUST·NOVEM BER 2013 Nore: The appearance of observations in this section does not suggest verification or acceptance ofa record. Observations of Review Species need to be documented and a rare bird report submitted to the Georgia Checklist and Records Committee (GCRC) for consideration. Fall 2013 brought a spate of interesting sightings, including the first state record of Tropical Kingbird in Clarke Co. and the third record of White.faced Ibis in Sumter Co. followed by the discovery of a Say's Phoebe there the next day. At the coast, an adult Northern Goshawk and Snow Bunting delighted a lucky few on Little St. Simons Island. A very success ful pelagic trip from St Mary's found multiple Black·capped Petrels, 7 Brown Boobies, and a Long·tailed Jaeger, while inland birders were treated to a remarkable 3 Sabine's Gulls at Lake Hartwel I. Abbreviations: ACOGB - Annotated Checklist of Georgia Birds, 2003, Beaton, G. et al., GOS Occ. Publ. No. 14; AIC - Andrews Island Causeway and spoil site, Glynn Co.; AP - American Proteins settling ponds, Forsyth Co.; AWMA - Altamaha Waterfowl Management Area, Mcintosh Co.; BCL - Bartow Co. Loop, a cluster of sod fur ms and cattle ponds on Brandon Farm Road and Taff Road, west of Cartersville; BUENWR - Bradley Unit of the Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge, Stewart Co.; CBC - Christmas Bird Count; CCWA - Clayton Co. Water Authority, Clayton Co.; CI NS - Cumberland Island National Sea~hore , Camden Co.; CLRL - Carter's Lake Re-regulation Lake area, Murray Co.; COP - Centennial Olympic Park, Fulton Co.; CRNRA - Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area; CSU - Cochran Shoals Unit of the CRNRA, Cobb Co.; GI - Gould's Inlet, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Re Egionall Ly Imp Portant T Resou Urces
    Reegionally Important Resources “It has been said that, at its best, preservation engages the past in a conversation with the present over a mutual concern for the future.” Georgia Mountains Regional Commission INTRODUCTION A region’s cultural, historic, and natural resources constitute native conditions and elemental quality; each contributes equally to local character and livelihood. As the rivers and lakes supplying public water, mineral deposits that support local industry, or a scenic park serving locals and tourists alike, these resources can, properly managed, greatly serve a community’s health, vigor, and economy. Because these sites and conditions are highly susceptible to disturbance from human activity, they are regarded as being inherently sensitive and significant. As such, each regionally significant resource requires protection, preservation, and correct interpretation for public benefit. This document, the Georgia Mountains Regional Resource Plan, was developed by staff at the Georgia Mountains Regional Commission (GMRC) over the course of 2009 and 2010, with input and guidance by representatives from our member governments and private individuals and organizations. It is intended to serve as an inventory and assessment of those historic, cultural, and natural resources considered vital to the character, ecology and overall well being of the 13 county area. It is also to serve as a guide for incorporating the preservation and promotion of these resources amidst the varying layers of management applied by local, state and federal government organizations as well as private stakeholders. In conjunction with the other elements of the Regional Plan, this document will help provide for the appropriate level of protection as the region and its local communities work towards achieving their respective visions for a better, healthier, and more environmentally sound Georgia Mountains region.
    [Show full text]
  • SWAP 2015 Report
    STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN September 2015 GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE RESOURCES DIVISION Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Recommended reference: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. 2015. Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan. Social Circle, GA: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Recommended reference for appendices: Author, A.A., & Author, B.B. Year. Title of Appendix. In Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan (pages of appendix). Social Circle, GA: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Cover photo credit & description: Photo by Shan Cammack, Georgia Department of Natural Resources Interagency Burn Team in Action! Growing season burn on May 7, 2015 at The Nature Conservancy’s Broxton Rocks Preserve. Zach Wood of The Orianne Society conducting ignition. i Table&of&Contents& Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv! Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ x! I. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................. 1! A Plan to Protect Georgia’s Biological Diversity ....................................................... 1! Essential Elements of a State Wildlife Action Plan .................................................... 2! Species of Greatest Conservation Need ...................................................................... 3! Scales of Biological Diversity
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of The
    VASCULAR FLORA OF THE UPPER ETOWAH RIVER WATERSHED, GEORGIA by LISA MARIE KRUSE (Under the Direction of DAVID E. GIANNASI) ABSTRACT The Etowah River Basin in North Georgia is a biologically diverse Southern Appalachian River system, threatened by regional population growth. This is a two-part botanical study in the Upper Etowah watershed. The primary component is a survey of vascular flora. Habitats include riparian zones, lowland forest, tributary drainages, bluffs, and uplands. A total of 662 taxa were inventoried, and seventeen reference communities were described and mapped. Small streams, remote public land, and forested private land are important for plant conservation in this watershed. In the second component, cumulative plant species richness was sampled across six floodplain sites to estimate optimal widths for riparian buffer zones. To include 90% of floodplain species in a buffer, 60-75% of the floodplain width must be protected, depending on the stream size. Soil moisture influences species richness, and is dependent on upland water sources. An optimal buffer would protect hydrologic connections between floodplains and uplands. INDEX WORDS: Etowah River, Southeastern United States, floristic inventory, riparian buffer zone, floodplain plant species, plant habitat conservation VASCULAR FLORA OF THE UPPER ETOWAH RIVER WATERSHED, GEORGIA by LISA MARIE KRUSE B.S., Emory University, 1996 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE
    [Show full text]
  • G E O R G I a Now!
    WWW.GOFISHGEORGIA.COM GEORGIA SPORT FISHING 2014 REGULATIONS › Celebrate Georgia’s Free Fishing Days – Page 6 › Happy Birthday Boater Bonus – Page 17 BUY YOUR LICENSE NOW! Quality Homes Built on Your Land!!! Homes for Every Budget Call Now for a New Home Plan Guide From $65,000 to $375,000 The Prices are Unbelievable and So Is the Quality! WWW.TRINITYCUSTOM.COM Modify any plan to meet YOUR needs! SUNRISE $103,100 MOUNTAINSIDE $113,900 JASPER SPLIT $132,200 FRONTIER $90,100 LAKE BLUE RIDGE $123,500 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 3 Bedrooms, 2½ Baths 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 3 Bedrooms, 2½ Baths VICTORIAN $207,700 TIMBERLINE $200,100 CHEROKEE FARMHOUSE $143,100 COLUMBUS $149,700 CHARLESTON MANOR $292,200 4 Bedrooms, 2½ Baths 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths Bedrooms, 2½ Baths 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 5 Bedrooms, 3½ Baths NEW FULL BRICK HOMES NOBODY OFFERS MORE VALUE IN YOUR FAMILY’S NEW HOME! • 2x6 Exterior Walls • House Wrap • R19 Insulated Walls & Floors OVER • 5/8’ Roof Decking • R38 Insulated Ceilings • Architectural Shingles • Custom Wood Cabinets 110 • Central Heat & Air • Gutters Front & Back STOCK • Kenmore Appliances NASHVILLE $144,300 SUMMERVILLE $116,900 PLANTATIONVILLE $156,300 PLANS • Cultured Marble Vanities • Granite Kitchen Counter Tops 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths 4 Bedrooms, 2½ Baths • 9’ First Floor Ceilings • Knockdown Ceiling Finish Office Locations: 8’ Ceilings on Brick Homes GUARANTEED Hours of Operation: BUILDOUT Ellijay 1-888-818-0278 • Dublin 1-866-419-9919 Monday - Friday 9am to 6pm Saturday 10am to 4pm Lavonia 1-866-476-8615 • Cullman, AL 256-737-5055 Visit one of our Models or Showrooms Today TIMES Montgomery, AL 334-290-4397 • Augusta 1-866-784-0066 Don’t Be Overcharged For Your New Home! Price does not include land improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I. Habitat Restoration Technical Team Report
    I-1 Appendix I. Habitat Restoration Technical Team Report Table of Contents Achieving SWAP Objectives Over the Last Ten Years, Shan Cammack .................................................... 3 State-Wide Initiatives .................................................................................................................................... 4 Georgia Prescribed Fire Council, Mark Melvin Invasive Species Efforts, Eamonn Leonard and Karan Rawlins Interagency Burn Team, Jimmy Rickard State Agencies ............................................................................................................................................. 30 Department of Natural Resources 50 Year Plans in Wildlife Resources Division, Don McGowan and Matt Payne DNR Prescribed Fire Program, Shan Cammack Spotlights on Conservation, Wildlife Resources Division staff Oyster Restoration and Enhancements, Coastal Resources Division staff Working Farms and Forestlands, Reggie Thackston and James Tomberlin Private Lands Program Summary, Eric Darracq Resource Management in State Parks Division, Sim Davidson and Brian Nichols Georgia Forestry Commission Prescribed Burning in Georgia, Neal Edmonson Private Lands Programs, Scott Griffin Federal Entities ........................................................................................................................................... 61 Department of Defense (DOD) Update on DOD Installations, Tim Beaty and Contributors National Park Service (NPS) Cumberland Island National Seashore, Doug Hoffman National
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Treasures
    Georgia S s Wetland Treasures GA DNR Coastal Resources Division www.knowtheconnection.com GA DNR Coastal Resources Sponsored by: Georgia Department of Natural Resources Coastal Resources Division Aand The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Written by Margaret Olsen C O A S T L G E R I KNOW THE CONNECTION KNOW Oceanography Teacher Woodward Academy, College Park, GA United States Environmental Protection Illustrated by Marsha Ward Agency Department of Natural Resources 06/06 Coastal Resources Division Coastal Resources Division Georgia epart ent of Natural Resources - Coastal Resources Division The Coastal Resources Division (CRD) has primary responsibility for managing Georgia's marshes, beaches, and marine fishery resources. Based in Brunswick, CRD administers Georgia's Coastal Management Program; permitting programs under the Coastal Marshlands Protection Act and Shore Protection Act; issues revocable licenses for use of state-owned water bottoms; monitors coastal water quality; and manages shellfish harvest areas. CRD conducts research; management and development activities associated with recreational and commercial fishery resources; represents Georgia on regional marine fishery boards and commissions; and builds boat ramps, artificial reefs, and fishing piers. Mission Statement The mission of the Department of Natural Resources is to sustain, to enhance, to protect, and to conserve Georgia's natural, historic, and cultural resources for present and future generations. isslon The mission of the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency is to protect human health and to safeguard the natural environment - air, water, and land - upon which life depends! E s purpose is to ensure that: ® All Americans are protected from significant risks to human health and to the environment where they live, learn, and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Trout Fishing in North Georgia
    Jimmy Jacobs Trout Fishing in North Georgia A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO PUBLIC LAKES, RESERVOIRS, AND RIVERS Published by PEACHTREE PUBLISHERS 1700 Chattahoochee Avenue Atlanta, Georgia 30318-2112 www.peachtree-online.com Text ©1998, 2001, 2007 by Jimmy Jacobs Photographs ©2001 by Jimmy Jacobs, Glenda Cole, Polly Dean Cover photograph © 2001 by Jimmy Jacobs All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other—except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by Loraine M. Joyner Composition by Melanie McMahon Ives Maps by Douglas J. Ponte Interior illustrations by Robert Harris Photographs by Jimmy Jacobs, except where noted; photographs on pages 70, 128, and 207 by Polly Dean; photographs on page 179 by Glenda Cole Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jacobs, Jimmy. Trout fishing in North Georgia : a comprehensive guide to public lakes, reservoirs, and rivers / by Jimmy Jacobs. -- 4th ed. p. cm. ISBN 1-56145-403-6 1. Trout fishing--Georgia. I. Title. SH688.U6J33 2007 799.17'5709758--dc22 2006031387 Contents Introduction: Discovering Georgia Trout......................................................XI Georgia Trout Waters . XV Recommended Destinations . XVII Part One Basic Trout Angling 1 The Trout . 2 The Brook Trout . 2 The Rainbow Trout . 6 The Brown Trout . 8 2 The Tackle . 12 Bait Fishing . 13 Spin Fishing . 15 Fly-Fishing . 17 3 The Tactics .
    [Show full text]
  • 2015, and Encourages an Even Deeper Appreciation for Georgia’S Rich Realm of Nongame Wildlife
    L oggerhead sea turtles. Bald eagles. Northern long-eared bats. Monkeyface orchids, bluestripe shiners, Tennessee heelsplitters. Sandhills and longleaf pine savannas. Black Belt prairies. In Georgia, the rich names of these and other native animals, plants and habitats reflect a rich heritage: Our state is one of the most biologically diverse in the U.S. But that heritage is threatened. More than 600 of our wildlife species are considered a high priority for conservation. And that’s not counting the wild places they need to survive. As part of Georgia DNR’s Wildlife Resources Division, our mission at the Nongame Conservation Section is conserving the more than 95 percent of species not legally fished for or hunted, plus rare plants and natural habitats. From research to education, this work involves creatures and landscapes treasured by millions and critical to a wildlife-watching economic impact that exceeds $1 billion a year in our state. Conserving nongame also isn’t just about today. Restoring wildlife and habitats means our children and grandchildren will also enjoy soaring bald eagles and cathedral-like longleaf forests. You can help ensure that heritage continues. When you buy or renew an eagle or hummingbird license plate, or contribute through the Give Wildlife a Chance tax checkoff, you provide vital funding for this work. Thank you for your interest. I hope this report informs you of our progress in 2015, and encourages an even deeper appreciation for Georgia’s rich realm of nongame wildlife. Jon Ambrose Chief, Nongame Conservation
    [Show full text]