DOCSLIB.ORG

Wetland Treasures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wetland Treasures Georgia S s Wetland Treasures GA DNR Coastal Resources Division www.knowtheconnection.com GA DNR Coastal Resources Sponsored by: Georgia Department of Natural Resources Coastal Resources Division Aand The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Written by Margaret Olsen C O A S T L G E R I KNOW THE CONNECTION KNOW Oceanography Teacher Woodward Academy, College Park, GA United States Environmental Protection Illustrated by Marsha Ward Agency Department of Natural Resources 06/06 Coastal Resources Division Coastal Resources Division Georgia epart ent of Natural Resources - Coastal Resources Division The Coastal Resources Division (CRD) has primary responsibility for managing Georgia's marshes, beaches, and marine fishery resources. Based in Brunswick, CRD administers Georgia's Coastal Management Program; permitting programs under the Coastal Marshlands Protection Act and Shore Protection Act; issues revocable licenses for use of state-owned water bottoms; monitors coastal water quality; and manages shellfish harvest areas. CRD conducts research; management and development activities associated with recreational and commercial fishery resources; represents Georgia on regional marine fishery boards and commissions; and builds boat ramps, artificial reefs, and fishing piers. Mission Statement The mission of the Department of Natural Resources is to sustain, to enhance, to protect, and to conserve Georgia's natural, historic, and cultural resources for present and future generations. isslon The mission of the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency is to protect human health and to safeguard the natural environment - air, water, and land - upon which life depends! E s purpose is to ensure that: ® All Americans are protected from significant risks to human health and to the environment where they live, learn, and work. ® National efforts to reduce environmental risk are based on the best available scientific information. Federal laws protecting human health and the environment are enforced fairly and effectively. ® Environmental protection is an integral consideration in U.S . policies concerning natural resources, human health, economic growth, energy, transportation, agriculture, industry, and international trade, and these factors are similarly considered in establishing environmental policy. All parts of society-communities, individuals, business, state and local governments, tribal governments-have access to accurate information 5ufcient to effectively participate in managing human health and environmental risks. ® Environmental protection contributes to making our communities and ecosystems diverse, sustainable, and economically productive. ® The United States plays a leadership role in working with other nations to protect the global environment. United States Environmental Protection Agency I would like to give a very special and heartfelt thanks to all those who played important roles in helping to bring this project about. First and foremost, I want to thank my very best friend and husband Mickey Olsen. He is the light of my life and always gives me unwavering support, understanding, and encouragement. Marsha Ward for her incredible artwork. Bunny Clayton for editing and putting up with my terrible spelling. Sarah Mitchell for some editing and scientific verification. Sally Hewes and Del Pamplin for layout suggestions. eborah Moroney for scientific verification of some of the fact sheets. Andrew Lampkin for developing and the original artwork for the wetland wheels. Janet Evans of the DNR Coastal Resources Division for her help and support. The following for either submitting activities that were included in the guide or for their support and suggestions: Bunny Clayton, John "Crawfish" Crawford, Eve Funderburk (Ga. Adopt-A-Wetland), Cheryl Gibson, Petey Giroux (Project Wet), Georgia Graves (Coastal Encounters Nature Center), Sally ewes, Roddie Higginbotham, James Jackson, Gail Joiner, Andrew Lampkin, Deborah Moroney, and Leigh Scott. To all those whom I have not mentioned who gave their support, encouragement, and advice. ti I dedicate this guide to all the students and teachers of Georgia with the following quote from my very dear friend Georgia Graves of Coastal Encounters Nature Center, Saint Simons Island, Georgia. "Understanding and appreciating Southeast Georgia's beautiful and fragile ecosystems as they relate to our students and the global environment is crucial to the future and longevity of these magnificent places. Teach them how the marsh, or any wetland, protects us and benefits us, but that it can only do this if, in return, we give it the respect, care, and appreciation it deserves. We may be the complex, high level thinkers with the ability to reason, but never underestimate those wild critters' ability to adapt and survive in a lifestyle that we may only observe and understand, yet never match. If our students leave a wetland or our classrooms taking with them a new respect for these ecosystems, and with the understanding that one person's actions will affect life on earth for generations to come, then we have done our job." It is my hope that this guide will enable teachers all over the state of Georgia and beyond to inspire their students by providing them a better understanding of the importance of preserving the wonderful but fragile wetland habits of our state. Table of Contents Page Number Section I: Fact Sheets What is a Wetland? 1 How Do Wetlands Form? 2-3 History of Wetlands and Wetland Trends 4-7 Where Does Georgia Stand? 8-9 Coastal Wetlands In Georgia - Map 10 Georgia's Wetland Habitats - Map 11 Georgia's Lakes and Rivers - Map 12 Types of Wetlands 13-19 The Altamaha River 20 Land of the Trembling Earth - The Okefenokee 21-22 Wetland Functions and Values 23-27 Wetland Hydrology 28 Water Quality in Wetlands 29 The Water Cycle is the Vital Link between Wetlands and Watersheds 30 Wetland Soils 31-32 Wetlands as Ecosystems 33-34 Examples of Wetland Food Chains and Food Webs 35 Nutrient Cycling in a Wetland - The Nitrogen Cycle 36 Wetland Productivity 37 Adaptations of Wetland Plants 38-39 Some Common Wetland Plants with scientific names 40-44 Adaptations of Wetland Animals 45-49 Some Common Animals of Wetland Habitats 50-52 Major Threats to Wetlands 53-55 Pollution In Wetlands 56 Point Source Vs Non-point Source Pollution 57 What Can You Do To Protect The Wetlands? 58-59 Section Activities Build A Wetland Model 61-62 Create A Bog Ecosystem/Habitat in Your Back Yard 63-64 Wetlands: Nature's Sponge 65-66 Timeline of the History of Major Wetland Regulations in the U. S . and Ga. 67-68 Where Have All The Wetlands Gone? 69-70 Going, Going - Hey Wait A Minute: A Wetland Tug of War 71-73 The Wetland ABC Game 74 Which Soil Holds More Water? 75-76 Identifying Wetland Soils 77-81 Color Me Wet! 80 Key To Soil Texture by Feel 81 pH Changes Along A Wetland 82-83 The Effect of Salinity on Plant Growth 84-85 Wetland Plants Filter Pollution 86-87 Wetland Vs Land Plants 88-89 Energy Flow in a Wetland Food Chain 90-92 Osmotic Pressures on Organisms in Aquatic Environments 93-95 Using Millipore Samplers to Test for Bacteria in Wetland Waters 96-98 Pollution in the Wetlands 99-100 Coastal Birds as Indicators of Pollution 101-103 Acid Pollution Vs Wetland Plant Growth 104-106 Wetland Wheels for Freshwater Wetland Habitats 107-128 The Adventures of Billy The Bass 129-133 How To Dress An Alligator 134 Tracking Wetland Wildlife 135-137 Tracks and Scat Identification Guide 137 Marshview Inherits Heron's Nest Plantation (A Townhall Meeting) 138-142 You and Me and Wetlands Make Three 143-145 Who Am I - A Wetland Habitat Concentration Game 146-151 A Walk Through The Salt Marsh 152-155 A Marsh Walk Through The Earth Day Nature Trail 156-159 Adopt A Wetland To Study 160-165 Interdisciplinary Activities 166-169 Section : Identification Guides Identification Guide to Some Common Marine Plankton 171 Identification Guide to Some Common Freshwater Plankton 173 Identification Guide to Some Common Plants of Coastal Salt Marshes 175-177 Identification Guide to Some Common Plants of Brackish Marshes 179 Identification Guide to Some Common Plants of Freshwater Marshes 181-- - Identification Guide to Some Common Plants of Forested Wetlands 183-185 Identification Guide to Some Common Plants of Shrub/Scrub Swamps 187 Identification Guide to Some Common Bog Plants 189 Identification Guide to Some Common Plants of Freshwater Ponds and Seeps 189 Identification Guide to Some Common Trees of the Swamp 191 Identification Guide to Some Birds Common to Various Wetland Habitats 193 Identification Guide to Some Animals that Frequent Various Wetland Habitats 195 Section IV: Hove To Salinity Chart 197 How To Test for pH 198 How To Test for Dissolved Oxygen 198-199 How To Test Turbidity 199 How To Test for Nitrates, Nitrites, and Ammonia 199-200 How To Test for Phosphate/Phosphorus 200 How To Test for Coliform Bacteria 200 Recipe for preparing Sucrose Solutions 201 How To Make Your Own Secchi Disc 201 How To Construct Your Own Plankton Net 202 Section V: Marinating Your Vocabulary Glossary 203-210 Section VI: Appendix Wetlands on the Web 211 Where to Obtain Materials and Supplies 212 Wetland Related Videos 212 Sources of Information 213-214 References 215-218 What Is Wetland? A Wetland, simply put, is a wet area where land and water mix in unique and complex ways to create extraordinarily diverse types of habitats. Wetlands are areas of transition located between dry land (terrestrial) habitats and deep water or aquatic habitats where the water table is at or near the land's surface. Most wetlands have three characteristics in common; their hydrology, their substrate or hydric soils, and their hydrophyte vegetation . Hydrology of a wetland: Water is the lifeblood of a wetland and is the primary factor controlling the soil structure as well as the types of plants and animals that live there. The water level fluctuates, but the top twelve inches (one foot) of soil must be saturated with water for extended periods of time (at least 15 days) during the growing season.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prohibited Species: What NOT to Plant
    Prohibited Species: What NOT to Plant e new NJDEP Coastal Management Zone blooms and large red rose hips, this is a non-native Regulations specify that dunes in New Jersey will be plant and should be avoided when restoring native planted with native species only. What follows is a list dunes. Beach plum and bayberry are native plants with of non-indigenous and/or non-native plant species that high habitat value that would be better choices for should NOT be planted on dunes. planting in areas in where rugosa rose is being considered. An alternative rose would be Virginia rose European beachgrass (Ammophila arenaria ) – (Rosa virginiana). While this is not available locally, it is available online and from catalogs for import from California and Salt cedar (Tamarisk sp.) – Its extreme salt tolerance Oregon but would be devastating to the local ecology makes it a common choice for shore gardeners. While if planted here. this plant is not too invasive in dry areas, it is a real threat in riparian areas and planting it should be Dunegrass (Leymus mollis) – is is a native species avoided. to North America but is not indigenous as far south as New Jersey. It occurs from Massachusetts through the Shore juniper (Juniperus conferta) – is species is a Canadian Maritimes and in the Pacific Northwest. non-native, creeping evergreen groundcover and is is plant would not be adapted to our hot, dry used primarily as an ornamental landscaping summers and would not thrive locally. foundation plant. Blue lyme grass (Leymus arenaria) – is is a non- Japanese Black Pine (Pinus thunbergii) – native, ornamental, coastal landscaping grass that is Japanese black pine is highly used by landscapers in not an appropriate plant species for dune stabilization.
    [Show full text]
  • On Tropical Drosera Rotundifolia L
    Technical Refereed Contribution On tropical Drosera rotundifolia L. Andreas Fleischmann • Botanische Staatssammlung München and GeoBio-Center LMU University • Menzinger Strasse 67 • D-80638 Munich • Germany • [email protected] Abstract: Two aspects on the morphology and biology of the Philippine population of D. rotundifo- lia were not answered by Coritico and Fleischmann (2016), namely its seed morphology and sea- sonal growth cycle - especially regarding hibernaculum formation, as it is known from its temperate congeners. These gaps can now be covered from observations made from cultivated plants and shall be reported here. Further aspects on the biology of Philippine D. rotundifolia (and other tropical populations of temperate Drosera) in cultivation and natural habitat are presented. Distribution and altitudinal range of Drosera rotundifolia The generic type species of Drosera, Drosera rotundifolia L., is probably the most well-known sundew species, at least to people from the Northern Hemisphere. It is also the most widespread1, its range spans the entire boreal region (Fig. 1; Meusel et al. 1965). Its southernmost populations in the Northern Hemisphere are situated in SE China, in the mountain ranges of northern Guangdong province, at ca. 24.5°N (Coritico & Fleischmann 2016). In Europe its more or less continuous range reaches to ca. 39°N to the south in central Spain, in North America to ca. 34°N in northern Georgia and Alabama states, in Japan to 30°N on the island of Yakushima (Coritico & Fleischmann 2016). Additionally, D. rotundifolia shows a few isolated outlier populations in some areas of the Mediter- ranean [e.g. on the isle of Corsica, France (Delange & Hugot 2020), in the Sierra Nevada of southern Spain (Lorite 2016), and in northern Greece (just three sites known in the Rhodope Mountains; The- odoropoulos & Eleftheriadou 2012)], in central Lebanon (Diels 1906; Tohmé & Tohmé 2007; despite erroneous claims, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivorous Plant Newsletter Vol 48 No 4 December 2019
    Drosera in the western USA—an update Barry A. Rice • Center for Plant Diversity • University of California • One Shields Avenue • Davis • California 95616 • USA • [email protected] Keywords: Taxonomy: Drosera, western USA, Drosera anglica, Drosera intermedia, Drosera linearis, Drosera × obovata, Drosera rotundifolia, Drosera × woodii. One of my primary research activities focuses on carnivorous plants in the US states of Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, and westward (but excluding Alaska). Throughout most of this range, the only native species of Drosera are Drosera rotundifolia L., Drosera anglica Huds., and the hybrid Drosera × obovata Mert. & Koch. These species are well-known to readers of this jour- nal, and need no further description. In this region, these plants quite often occur in sites that are widely separated, and in some states these taxa are of considerable rarity (for example, in Colorado D. rotundifolia and D. anglica are known at only 4 and 1 sites, respectively; Wolf et al. 2006). In addition to these species, there have been reports of two additional native Drosera—Drosera intermedia Hayne in northern Idaho (and perhaps adjacent eastern Washington), and Drosera lin- earis Goldie in Montana. Drosera intermedia was reported in Boundary County, Idaho by Bursik (1993), as growing with Drosera anglica, but being quite different in form. Additional populations were subsequently found in Custer County, Idaho (L. Kinter, pers. comm. 2017). Of course, the closest other Drosera inter- media plants were on the other side of the continent, so this was considered a find of great interest, and the plants were treated as of special significance. A few years ago, I decided I needed to visit and assess these plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Drosera Intermedia in a Northern Michigan Bog
    Assessment of microhabitat differences between Drosera rotundifolia and Drosera intermedia in a northern Michigan bog Andrew David University of Michigan Biological Station EEB 381, General Ecology August 19, 2010 Professor Cathy Bach Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate microhabitat differences between two species of sundews, Drosera rotundifolia and Drosera intermedia. I tested several hypotheses: D. rotundifolia density increases with increasing height above a fixed low point, while D. intermedia density decreases with height; D. rotundifolia grows primarily on red Sphagnum moss, while D. intermedia grows primarily on green Sphagnum; the densities of both Drosera species increase with decreasing pH; the density of neither Drosera species is affected by water conductivity or dissolved oxygen content. At Mud Lake Bog in Cheboygan County, Michigan, I recorded the species of Drosera plants, as well as the height of the plants above a fixed low point and the color of Sphagnum moss on which they were growing. I also measured the pH, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen content of the water in which the plants were growing. Densities of both Drosera species decreased with increasing height, though the trend was stronger for D. intermedia. D. rotundifolia grew significantly more on red Sphagnum than did D. intermedia, while D. intermedia grew significantly more on green Sphagnum than did D. rotundifolia. D. rotundifolia density varied significantly with neither pH, conductivity, nor dissolved oxygen. D. intermedia density increased significantly with decreasing pH and increasing conductivity, but not with dissolved oxygen. My results were consistent with past research, and conclusively illustrated the differences in microhabitat preferences between the two Drosera species.
    [Show full text]
  • 678.973.2437 770.493.8862 AAS Goes to Colombia
    April 2010 Volume XXXVI, Issue 4 ATLANTA AUDUBON SOCIETY AAS Goes to Colombia INSIDE By Ted Reissing GOS Guided Tour..................2 Now that the narco-terrorists have been brought under control, birders are flocking back to Colombia. First Time Birders ................2 With almost 10% of the world’s bird species (more than twice as many as can be found in the entire U.S.) and about 75 endemics, this country is a natural target for listers. In addition, the top bird Annual Report ......................3 conservation group in the country, ProAves, has developed a series of 15 preserves to protect specific birds and created lodging facilities to house visitors. Because of all these developments, AAS put Field Notes - January ..........4 together a trip to do some serious birding in Colombia and the results of this outing are highlighted Field Trips.............................5 here. Delta flies directly from Atlanta to Bogotá daily and the four-hour A Million Thanks..................6 flight arrives just after 9 PM (there is no time change when we are on standard time). If you do start in Colombia’s capital city, an Volunteer Opportunities.......6 early morning visit to a local park can reveal eight to 10 good lifers Conservation Days...............6 including the endemic Bogotá Rail. From there it is usually about an eight-hour motor trip to one of the major preserves. For this tour Merritt Island.......................7 we chose El Paujil, the prime site for the critically endangered Blue-billed Curassow. Very few outsiders have seen this bird in the Bird Journal ........................7 wild, but after a couple of days of climbing steep trails in 95°F and Blue-billed Curassow Sculpting Birds....................8 Photographer: ProAves 90% humidity, we were fortunate to see two birds that flew directly over our heads.
    [Show full text]
  • DROSERA ROTUNDIFOLIA DIET DETERMINATION USING DNA DATA by 1,2 2 2,3 BARBORA LEKESYTE , STEPHEN KETT and MARTIJN J.T.N
    Journal of the Lundy Field Society, 6, 2018 WHAT’S ON THE MENU: DROSERA ROTUNDIFOLIA DIET DETERMINATION USING DNA DATA by 1,2 2 2,3 BARBORA LEKESYTE , STEPHEN KETT AND MARTIJN J.T.N. TIMMERMANS 2Department of Natural Sciences, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London, NW4 4BT 3Department of Life Science, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD 1Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The round-leaved sundew, Drosera rotundifolia, is a carnivorous plant species. On Lundy it is found in the nutrient-poor bog environments of Pondsbury and the northernmost quarry, where it supplements its diet with invertebrate prey. To gain insight into the diet of these two sundew populations a metabarcoding approach was trialled. This is, to our knowledge, the first study to use DNA barcodes to identify Drosera prey. At each site, a 0.25m2 quadrat was placed in a representative Drosera patch and two days’ worth of prey were collected. To identify prey items, Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COX1) sequences were obtained and compared to the Barcode of Life database. This revealed that Lundy sundews have a mixed diet. In total at least 20 different prey taxa were detected in the two 0.25m2 areas sampled. Sixteen taxa could be identified to species, indicating that metabarcoding permits accurate species level identification of sundew prey items. The majority of prey taxa were dipterans (two-winged flies), of which several have previously been reported on Lundy. Most prey taxa were detected in only one of the two quadrats examined (Jaccard’s index of Similarity=0.01; ‘dissimilar’).
    [Show full text]
  • Management Indicator Species Population and Habitat Trends
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Management Indicator Species Southern Region Population and Habitat Trends Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests Revised and Updated May 2003 i CONTENTS Page Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 Documentation of Management Indicator Species Selection ......................................... 1 Management Indicator Species Habitat Relationships............................................. 8 Forestwide Management Indicator Species Habitat Monitoring and Evaluation ............. 10 Forestwide Management Indicator Species Population Trend Monitoring and Evaluation ....................................................................................................................... 13 White-tailed Deer.......................................................................................................... 15 Black Bear..................................................................................................................... 19 Eastern Wild Turkey..................................................................................................... 23 Ruffed Grouse............................................................................................................... 27 Bobwhite Quail ............................................................................................................. 31 Gray Squirrel................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Drosera Rotundifolia L.)
    Sci Pharm www.scipharm.at Research article Open Access An Improved 2-step Liquid Culture System for Efficient In Vitro Shoot Proliferation of Sundew (Drosera rotundifolia L.) Christoph WAWROSCH *, Eva BENDA, Brigitte KOPP Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (C. Wawrosch) Sci Pharm. 2009; 77: 827–835 doi:10.3797/scipharm.0908-03 Published: September 21st 2009 Received: August 4th 2009 Accepted: September 21st 2009 This article is available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.0908-03 © Wawrosch et al; licensee Österreichische Apotheker-Verlagsgesellschaft m. b. H., Vienna, Austria. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract An efficient procedure for in vitro shoot production of the medicinal plant sundew (Drosera rotundifolia L.) was developed. Of three cytokinins tested, zeatin (ZEA) at a concentration of 2 µM resulted in the formation of large numbers of adventitious shoots on leaf explants. A larger size of the small shoots was achieved by combining a 2-weeks preculture with ZEA (step 1: shoot induction) with a 5-weeks main culture without plant growth regulators (step 2: shoot elongation). Liquid media were superior to semisolid media: An average of 27.4 shoots per leaf explant, and 53.3 shoots per shoot explant were achieved. The 2-step culture system with liquid media permits a comparatively cheap micropropagation of sundew as well as in vitro biomass production, with potential for scale-up.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plants of Louisiana
    Rare Plants of Louisiana Agalinis filicaulis - purple false-foxglove Figwort Family (Scrophulariaceae) Rarity Rank: S2/G3G4 Range: AL, FL, LA, MS Recognition: Photo by John Hays • Short annual, 10 to 50 cm tall, with stems finely wiry, spindly • Stems simple to few-branched • Leaves opposite, scale-like, about 1mm long, barely perceptible to the unaided eye • Flowers few in number, mostly born singly or in pairs from the highest node of a branchlet • Pedicels filiform, 5 to 10 mm long, subtending bracts minute • Calyx 2 mm long, lobes short-deltoid, with broad shallow sinuses between lobes • Corolla lavender-pink, without lines or spots within, 10 to 13 mm long, exterior glabrous • Capsule globe-like, nearly half exerted from calyx Flowering Time: September to November Light Requirement: Full sun to partial shade Wetland Indicator Status: FAC – similar likelihood of occurring in both wetlands and non-wetlands Habitat: Wet longleaf pine flatwoods savannahs and hillside seepage bogs. Threats: • Conversion of habitat to pine plantations (bedding, dense tree spacing, etc.) • Residential and commercial development • Fire exclusion, allowing invasion of habitat by woody species • Hydrologic alteration directly (e.g. ditching) and indirectly (fire suppression allowing higher tree density and more large-diameter trees) Beneficial Management Practices: • Thinning (during very dry periods), targeting off-site species such as loblolly and slash pines for removal • Prescribed burning, establishing a regime consisting of mostly growing season (May-June) burns Rare Plants of Louisiana LA River Basins: Pearl, Pontchartrain, Mermentau, Calcasieu, Sabine Side view of flower. Photo by John Hays References: Godfrey, R. K. and J. W. Wooten.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Field March - May 2011
    vol. 76 • 1 – 2 THE ORIOLE 37 FROM THE FIELD MARCH - MAY 2011 Note: The appearance of observations in this section does not suggest verification or acceptance of a record. Observations of “Review Species” need to be documented and a rare bird report submitted to the Georgia Checklist and Records Committee (GCRC) for consideration. Temperatures throughout the period remained slightly above average, with some notable extremes including a record March temperature of 90 ºF in Brunswick on the 22nd, the lowest May temperature since 1945 of 37 ºF in Athens on the 5th, and a record May high of 104 ºF in Waycross on the 23rd. Precipitation was equally variable across the state, with the north receiving 200-300% of the average rainfall for March and April, less than 25% of the average in the east for April, and less than 10% of the norm in the southwest. It was a record season for tornadoes, causing widespread damage, power outages, and at least 35 deaths. The storm system on 26-28 April may have been responsible for the appearance of a late inland White-winged Scoter in Columbus, and a string of interesting sightings at Lake Lanier including 2 Pacific Loons, a Laughing Gull, and 2 Caspian Terns. Abbreviations: ACOGB - Annotated Checklist of Georgia Birds, 2003, Beaton, G. et al., GOS Occ. Publ. No. 14; AIC - Andrews Island Causeway and spoil site, Glynn Co.; AP - American Proteins settling ponds, Forsyth Co.; AWMA - Altamaha Waterfowl Management Area, McIntosh Co.; BCL - Bartow Co. Loop, a cluster of sod farms, plus cattle ponds on Brandon Farm Road and Taff Road, west of Cartersville, Bartow Co.; BUENWR - Bradley Unit of the Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge, Stewart Co.; CBC - Christmas Bird Count; CINS - Cumberland Island National Seashore, Camden Co.; CLRL - Carter’s Lake Re-regulation Lake area, Murray Co.; COP - Centennial Olympic Park, Fulton Co.; CRNRA - Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area; CSU - Cochran Shoals Unit of the CRNRA, Cobb Co.; ELHLAF - E.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Viruses Virus Diseases Poaceae(Gramineae)
    Viruses and virus diseases of Poaceae (Gramineae) Viruses The Poaceae are one of the most important plant families in terms of the number of species, worldwide distribution, ecosystems and as ingredients of human and animal food. It is not surprising that they support many parasites including and more than 100 severely pathogenic virus species, of which new ones are being virus diseases regularly described. This book results from the contributions of 150 well-known specialists and presents of for the first time an in-depth look at all the viruses (including the retrotransposons) Poaceae(Gramineae) infesting one plant family. Ta xonomic and agronomic descriptions of the Poaceae are presented, followed by data on molecular and biological characteristics of the viruses and descriptions up to species level. Virus diseases of field grasses (barley, maize, rice, rye, sorghum, sugarcane, triticale and wheats), forage, ornamental, aromatic, wild and lawn Gramineae are largely described and illustrated (32 colour plates). A detailed index Sciences de la vie e) of viruses and taxonomic lists will help readers in their search for information. Foreworded by Marc Van Regenmortel, this book is essential for anyone with an interest in plant pathology especially plant virology, entomology, breeding minea and forecasting. Agronomists will also find this book invaluable. ra The book was coordinated by Hervé Lapierre, previously a researcher at the Institut H. Lapierre, P.-A. Signoret, editors National de la Recherche Agronomique (Versailles-France) and Pierre A. Signoret emeritus eae (G professor and formerly head of the plant pathology department at Ecole Nationale Supérieure ac Agronomique (Montpellier-France). Both have worked from the late 1960’s on virus diseases Po of Poaceae .
    [Show full text]