DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Inventory and Evaluation of Cold War Era Historical Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Inventory and Evaluation of Cold War Era Historical Resources Final • Inventory and Evaluation of Cold War Era Historical Resources Moffett Federal Airfield Moffett Field, California NASA Crows Landing Flight Facility Crows Landing, California Prepared by Alexandra C. Cole March 1999 -~ -=- ------ Science Appl/cations ~~~ InternationalCorporation • - ... ~ An Employee-OwnedCompany 816 State Street, Suite 500 • Santa Barbara, CA 93101 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................2 1.2.1 Section 106 Requirements ........................................................................................ 2 1.2.2 Cold War Building and Structure Requirements .................................................3 1.3 LOCATION OF PROJECT AREA ...................................................................................... .4 2.0 BACKGROUND RESEARCH AND METHODS ..................................................................... 9 2.1 BACKGROUND RESEARCH .............................................................................................. 9 2.2 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.2.1 Research Objectives .................................................................................................. 9 2.2.2 Archival Research ..................................................................................................... 9 2.2.3 Field Inventory ........................................................................................................ 10 2.2.4 National Register Criteria ...................................................................................... 10 3.0 HISTORIC CONTEXT ............................................................................................................... ..13 3.1 EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY ..................................................................................... 13 3.2 WORLD WAR II ERA ......................................................................................................... 14 3.2 COLD WAR ERA (1946-1989)........................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 General History of the Cold War ......................................................................... 15 3.2.2 History of the Navy in the Cold War .................................................................. 17 3.2.3. History of Moffett Field in the Cold War Era (1946-1989) ................................19 4.0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................... 36 5.0 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................... 41 5.1 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 44 5.2 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................... 44 6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 45 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................... 51 APPENDIX DRP 523 Forms for Moffett Federal Airfield and NASA Crows Landing Flight Facility -- LIST OF FIGURES 1-1 Project Location Moffett Federal Airfield ......................................................................5 ... 1-2 Moffett Federal Airfield Buildings and Structures ..........................................................6 1-3 Project Location NASA Crows Landing Flight Facility ...................................................7 1-4 NASA Crows Landing Flight Facility Buildings and Structures ....................................8 3-1 P-3 Orion Antisubmarine Warfare System ......................................................................23 3-2 P-3 Orion from VP-91 Making a Pass over Surfaced Submarine .................................29 3-3 P-3 Orion Aircraft Dropping a Sonobuoy .....................................................................30... LIST OFT ABLES 4-1 Cold War Era Buildings at Moffett Federal Airfield ......................................................37 4-2 Cold War Era Buildings at NASA Crows Landing Flight Facility ...............................40 4-3 Buildings at Moffett Field Associated with the Cold War Era P-3 Orion Nlission ................................................................................................................ 41 ,... ii ACRONYMS AIMD advanced intermediate maintenance depot ASW anti-submarine warfare AUW advanced underwater weapon CANG California Air National Guard DIFAR Directional Frequency and Ranging Direction of recorded sound DoD Department of Defense ECM electronic countermeasure ESM electronic surveillance measure GIUK Greenland, Iceland, United Kingdom ITTA heavier-than-air IFF Identification Friend or Foe LTA lighter-than-air MAD magnetic anomaly detector MFA Moffett Federal Airfield NAS Naval Air Station NASA National Aeronautical and Space Administration NATC Naval Air Training Center NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATS Naval Air Transport Service NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NRHP National Register of Historic Places SHPO State Historic Preservation Office SAIC Science Applications International Corporation SLBM submarine-launched ballistic missile sosus sound surveillance system SPA SOSUS probability area TACAN tactical air navigation TACCO tactical coordinator WST weapons systems training - Cover:Shadow of P-3 Orion Aircraft over a Victor Class Soviet Submarine. U.S. Navy Photograph iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A cultural resources survey was conducted at Moffett Federal Airfield (MFA), Moffett Field, California and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Crows Landing Flight Facility (formerly Naval Auxiliary Landing Field), Crows Landing, California, for NASA at Moffett Field. The purpose of the survey was to identify and evaluate all cultural resources within the MFA and NASA Crows Landing boundaries constructed between 1945 and 1989 for their Cold War significance. The survey consisted of an analysis of MFA and NASA Crows Landing's role in the Cold War, an architectural inventory of all buildings constructed during that period, and an evaluation of them to determine if they met the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) criteria of exceptionalsignificance used when assessing resources that are less than 50 years old (36 CFR 60.4, Criterion G). Of the 148 buildings and structures formally evaluated, none were considered eligible for listing on the NRHP. Twenty of these buildings were used specifically to support the P-3 Orion anti-submarine warfare (ASW) mission at MFA. Although this mission was considered of ,,... exceptionalnational significance within the Cold War context, the buildings themselves do not exhibit special architectural or engineering features that would give them exceptional significance as representatives of the Cold War P-3 mission. The remaining 128 buildings and structures are considered support buildings found at any installation and therefore are not considered significant. After the California State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has concurred with the results of the survey, the Section 106 process is complete. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the background, goals, methods and results of an architectural survey of Cold War resources conducted at MFA and NASA Crows Landing Flight Facility. In support of this survey, NASA contracted with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to prepare a cultural resources investigation to fulfill the identification requirements under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA). The architectural survey was conducted from February to April 1998, and consisted of the examination and evaluation of 148 Cold War-era (1946-1989) potentially significant historical resources within the MF A and NASA Crows Landing boundaries. 1.1 PURPOSE The primary goal of this survey was to determine the significance of Cold War-era facilities at MFA and NASA Crows Landing to assess potential effects of the long-term goals and objectives of NASA. These goals and objectives include the possible future renovation and/ or demolition of a selected number of the surveyed buildings. Recommendations regarding NRHP eligibility have been developed to allow NASA to submit a formal declaration of significance to the SHPO for review and concurrence to fulfill NASA's requirements under Section 106 of the NHPA. 1.2 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS Numerous laws and regulations require federal agencies to consider the effects of a proposed project on cultural resources. These laws and regulations stipulate a process for compliance, define the responsibilities of the federal agency proposing the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Silicon Valley Chapter Military Officers Association of America
    Silicon Valley Chapter Military Officers Association of America Volume XII Issue 11The Bulletin Dec 2015 OFFICERS, BOARD, AND CHAIRS PRESIDENT: Lt. Col. Mike Sampognaro USAF merry christmas to all 408-779-7389 1st VP: Lt. Col. Jay Craddock USAF 650-968-0446 2nd VP: CWO5 Robert Landgraf USMC 408-323-8838 Secretary: COL Warren Enos AUS Luncheon Program 408-245-2217 Treasurer: CAPT Lloyd McBeth USN 408-241-3514 17 Dec 2015 Past President: CAPT Paul Barrish USN 408-356-7531 Touring Morocco DIRECTORS & COMMITTEE CHAIRS Auxiliary Liaison vacant Chaplain Chaplain Fred Tittle USMC 609-802-3492 Commissary/Exchange Advisory CDR Ralph Hunt USN 650-967-8467 Friends-in-Need (FIN) Program CDR Al Mouns USN 408-257-5629 Programs Lt. Col. Jesse Craddock USAF 650-968-0446 ROTC CWO4 Patrick Clark USA 831-402-8548 Membership/Recruitment CWO5 Robert Landgraf USMC 408-323-8838 Scholarship CAPT Paul Barrish USN 408-356-7531 Travel (Space-A Advisory) CDR V.A. Eagye USN 408-733-3177 Web Master Lt Col Mike Sampognaro USAF 408-779-7389 Veteran Affairs Col Keith Giles,USAF(ret) Lt Col Neil Miles USAF 408-929-1142 Development Officer CAPT Gil Borgardt USN 650-342-1270 Sargeant-at-Arms Social Hour: 11:00 AM CDR Ralph Hunt USN 650-967-8467 Chapter Outreach CWO5 Robert Landgraf USMC 408-323-8838 Luncheon: 11:45 AM CALMOAA, Legislation & Navy League Liaison LCDR Tom Winant USN 650-678-7120 Luncheon is $26.00 Personal Affairs CAPT Robert French USN 650-363-1188 See Back Page for Reservations Form and Directions The Chapter Board meets at the Moffett Air Traffic Control Tower, Moffett Federal Airfield Bulletin Editor It is time to renew your Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1934
    TWENTY SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SI CRETARY OF COMMERCE 1934 t to sea1gtat Petletlie UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1934 Fo sale by the Superintendent of Documents Washington D C Price 20 cents paper cover ORGANIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT Secretary of Commerce DANIEr C ROPER Assistant Secretary of Commerce JOHN DICKINSON Assistant Secretary of Commerce EwINO Y MITCHELL Solicitor SOUTH TRIMBLE JR Administrative Assistant to the Secretary MALCOLM KERmx Chief Clerk and Superintendent EDWARD W LIBBEY Director Bureau of Air Commerce EUGENE L VIDAL Director of the Census WILLIAM L AUSTIN Director Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce C T MURCHHISON Director National Bureau of Standards LYnIAN J BRIGGS Commissioner of Fisheries Fnnxrc T BELL Commissioner of Lighthouses GEORGE R PUTNAM Director Coast and Geodetic Survey R 5 PATTON Director Bureau of Navigation and Steamboat Inspection JosERLL B WEAVER Commissioner of Patents CONWAY P COE Director United States Shipping Board Bureau J 0 PEACOCK Director Federal Employment Stabilization Office D II SAWYER n CONTENTS Page Expenditures vii Public works allotments xix Changes in organization VIII Discussion of functions of the Department LX Economic review Ix Reciprocal trade program xix Foreign and domestic commerce xix Air commerce XxI Lighthouse Service xxn Enforcement of navigation and steamboat inspection laws xxiv Surveying and mapping xxiv Fisheries xxvt National standards xxvxt Census activities xxrx Patents xxix Merchant marine xxx Foreigntrade zones xxxii Street and
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-95-133 Military Bases: Analysis of DOD's 1995 Process
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Congress and the GAO Chairman, Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission April 1995 MILITARY BASES Analysis of DOD’s 1995 Process and Recommendations for Closure md Realignment GAO/NSIAD-95-133 National Security and International Affairs Division B-26 1024 April 14,1995 To the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives The Honorable Alan J. Dixon Chairman, Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission The Secretary of Defense announced his 1995 recommendations for base closures and realignments to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission on February 28,1995. This report responds to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (P.L. 101~510), as amended, which requires that we provide the Congress and the Commission, by no later than April 15,1995, a report on the recommendations and selection process. We have identified issues for consideration by the Commission as it completes its review of the Secretary of Defense’s recommendations. Given that this is the last of three biennial reviews authorized under the 1990 act, we are also including matters for consideration by the Congress regarding the potential need for continuing Iegislation to authorize further commission reviews and authorize changes, as needed, to prior decisions We are sending copies of this report to the Chairmen, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Defense; Senate Committee on Armed Services; House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on National Security; House Committee on National Security; the Secretaries of Defense, the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force; and the Directors of the Defense Logistics Agency and the Defense Investigative Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Carmel Pine Cone, March 13, 2020 (Real Estate)
    More than 130 Open Houses this weekend! SECTION RE n March 13-19, 2020 The Carmel Pine Cone In YourDreams Real Estate Home & Garden n This week’s cover property, located at Carmel Valley Ranch, is presented by Ben Heinrich & The Heinrich Team of Coldwell Banker Realty. (See Page 2 RE) 2 IYD The Carmel Pine Cone March 13, 2020 About the Cover ONE BLOCK TO THE LODGE OCEAN AND Real Estate Sales The Carmel Pine Cone GOLF COURSE VIEWS March 1 - 7 1499 ALVA LANE, PEBBLE BEACH 7 BEDROOMS, 4 BATHS Carmel March 13-19, 2020 $5,950,000 Dolores Street, NW corner of 12th Avenue — $2,050,000 Michael Oliver and Nora Klemmen to Son of a Beach LLC APN: 010-159-007 Carmelo Street, 5 SW of Second Avenue — $4,700,000 Eva Breyer to Jennifer Christ APN: 010-242-039 See HOME SALES page 6 IYD 28089 Barn Way, Carmel | 3 bd, 3.5 bth | 2,356 sq.ft. Open House Saturday 1-3pm A Peaceful Feeling San Antonio 2 NE 4th Avenue One of the most private and peaceful settings at Carmel Valley Ranch, this unique free standing townhome offers a ground floor master bedroom that overlooks a green lawn to the Carmel River. Additional amenities on the ground floor include a sunny office / library with half bath. The updated kitchen opens to the dining area and spacious living room with fireplace. The second level includes 2 bedrooms, one a master sized king bedroom, each with en suite bathrooms which provide room for family and friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Wings
    Northern Wings Volume 6 No.14 The Aero Club of Northern California Official Newsletter Of WinterAnimal Husbandry 2008-2009 PhilBoyerawardedCrystal Eagle AOPA president 26th recipient of honor Phil Boyer, the longtime president of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association,becamethe 2008 recipient of the Crystal Eagle, awarded annually by the Aero Club of Northern California to honor those whose achievements are the highest in aviation. In a departure from the traditional Aero Club Crystal Eagledinner, the awardwaspresentedNov. 8during the closing banquet of AOPA Expo 2008,which drew nearly 10,000pilots --Northern Wings Photo tothe San Jose McEnery Convention AOPA President Phil Boyer, left,receives Eagle from Carl Honaker (Continued on Page 2) Huge airship may be in Hangar One’s future Another giant airship– possibly one In January, Lew Braxton, deputy restore Hangar One over the next year and a half to use it again “for its now being constructed in Akron, Ohio director of NASA Ames,told original purpose.’’ --may be inhistoricHangar One’s members of the Moffett Field That likely means an airship, for futureat Moffett Field. Restoration Advisory Board that the Hangar One’s original purpose in the But it may depend on a space agency isdevising a planto combination offederal and private 1930s was to house the giant dirigible, funding to restore the iconic structure USS Macon. It also indicates NASA to something usable. plans to re-skin the giant building The Navy, which operated Moffett after the Navy strips it bare beginning until 1994, plans to tear off the skin of this fall. thehangar, leaving only thebare So far, the only official skeleton standing for NASA Ames announcementhas beenthe Navy’s Research Center, which now runs the decision toremove the hangar’s airfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Resources Study, February 2017
    NASA Ames Research Center Archaeological Resources Study Prepared for: Prepared by: February 2017 NASA Ames Research Center Archaeological Resources Study Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Description...................................................................................................1 1.2 Preparers ..................................................................................................................1 2. CULTURAL SETTING ................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Prehistoric and Ethnohistoric Context .....................................................................4 2.2 Historic Context .......................................................................................................5 2.2.1 Spanish Period ..............................................................................................5 2.2.2 Mexican Period ............................................................................................6 2.2.3 American Period ...........................................................................................6 2.2.4 Moffett Field ..............................................................................................13 2.2.5 Ames Research Center ...............................................................................17 3. ARCHIVAL RESEARCH.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Battle
    NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS 16 The Third Battle Innovation in the U.S. Navy's Silent Cold War Struggle with Soviet Submarines N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O N L L U E E G H E T R I VI IBU OR A S CT MARI VI Owen R. Cote, Jr. Associate Director, MIT Security Studies Program The Third Battle Innovation in the U.S. Navy’s Silent Cold War Struggle with Soviet Submarines Owen R. Cote, Jr. Associate Director, MIT Security Studies Program NAVAL WAR COLLEGE Newport, Rhode Island Naval War College The Newport Papers are extended research projects that the Newport, Rhode Island Editor, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the Center for Naval Warfare Studies President of the Naval War College consider of particular Newport Paper Number Sixteen interest to policy makers, scholars, and analysts. Candidates 2003 for publication are considered by an editorial board under the auspices of the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies. President, Naval War College Rear Admiral Rodney P. Rempt, U.S. Navy Published papers are those approved by the Editor of the Press, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the President Provost, Naval War College Professor James F. Giblin of the Naval War College. Dean of Naval Warfare Studies The views expressed in The Newport Papers are those of the Professor Alberto R. Coll authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Naval War College or the Department of the Navy. Naval War College Press Editor: Professor Catherine McArdle Kelleher Correspondence concerning The Newport Papers may be Managing Editor: Pelham G.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit a - Part 3
    Exhibit A - Part 3 ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 002-354-027-000, 439 SOLEDAD STREET, SALINAS, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 93905 NOVEMBER 2019 PREPARED FOR: R.L. Hastings & Associates, LLC 1765 Carson Road Placerville, CA 95667 PREPARED BY: Historic Resource Associates 2001 Sheffield Drive El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY I. Introduction and Project Description . 1 II. Regulatory and Evaluation Framework . 1 III. Cultural Setting . 3 A. Archaeology . 3 B. Ethnography . 4 C. History . 5 IV. Survey Methods and Field Inventory . 7 V. Significance Statement . 7 VI. Research Results . 7 VII. Recommendations . 7 VIII. Professional Qualifications . 7 IX. References . 8 ATTACHMENTS NWIC Record Search Archaeological Study of 439 Soledad Street, Salinas, CA November 2019 I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The archaeological study of 439 Soledad Street, Salinas, Monterey County, California was requested by R. L. Hastings & Associates, LLC in order to comply with the National Environmental Quality Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) applying Section 106 regulations, as well as California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Salinas regulatory guidelines regarding historic preservation. The project location is identified as Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 002-354-027, and is depicted on the USGS 7.5' Salinas, California topographic quadrangle map. The project involves the demolition of the existing residence and construction of a new building on the subject parcel. The existing building on the property, built in 1938, was determined to be ineligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR).
    [Show full text]
  • Studying a Navy Relic, Undisturbed for Nearly 60 Years
    Studying a Navy Relic, Undisturbed for Nearly 60 Years By JOHN J. GEOGHEGAN III Published: October 3, 2006 in the New York Times Science section (Correction Appended) MOSS LANDING, Calif. — It was the largest aircraft ever built in the United States when it was launched by the Navy in 1933. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Researchers recently collected 44 hours of surveillance, including images of the crash site. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute An image of one of the four biplanes the craft was carrying. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Images of fuel tanks from the U.S.S. Macon. Larger than three 747’s parked nose to tail, almost four times as long as than Howard Hughes’s Spruce Goose and just a few feet short of the Titanic, the U.S.S. Macon was the high-tech wonder of its day. A rigid, lighter-than-air dirigible used by the Navy to extend the scouting range of its fleet, the Macon weighed over 200 tons and had an aluminum alloy skeleton underneath its canvas skin. It was kept aloft by 12 helium-filled gas cells, which, though not flammable and therefore safer than hydrogen, were also more costly and less efficient. The Macon was also the last of its kind when it crashed off California’s Big Sur coast in February 1935. Severe weather caused a massive structural failure in the Macon’s tail section, shearing off its dorsal fin and puncturing two of its helium gas cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixed Sonar Systems the History and Future of The
    THE SUBMARINE REVIEW FIXED SONAR SYSTEMS THE HISTORY AND FUTURE OF THE UNDEWATER SILENT SENTINEL by LT John Howard, United States Navy Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California Undersea Warfare Department Executive Summary One of the most challenging aspects of Anti-Submarine War- fare (ASW) has been the detection and tracking of submerged contacts. One of the most successful means of achieving this goal was the Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) developed by the United States Navy in the early 1950's. It was designed using breakthrough discoveries of the propagation paths of sound through water and intended to monitor the growing submarine threat of the Soviet Union. SOSUS provided cueing of transiting Soviet submarines to allow for optimal positioning of U.S. ASW forces for tracking and prosecution of these underwater threats. SOSUS took on an even greater national security role with the advent of submarine launched ballistic missiles, ensuring that U.S. forces were aware of these strategic liabilities in case hostilities were ever to erupt between the two superpowers. With the end of the Cold War, SOSUS has undergone a number of changes in its utilization, but is finding itself no less relevant as an asset against the growing number of modern quiet submarines proliferating around the world. Introduction For millennia, humans seeking to better defend themselves have set up observation posts along the ingress routes to their key strongholds. This could consist of something as simple as a person hidden in a tree, to extensive networks of towers communicating 1 APRIL 2011 THE SUBMARINE REVIEW with signal fires.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Navy in the World (1981-1990)
    The U.S. Navy in the World (1981-1990): Context for U.S. Navy Capstone Strategies and Concepts Peter M. Swartz with Karin Duggan MISC D0026419.A1/Final December 2011 CNA is a not-for-profit organization whose professional staff of over 700 provides in-depth analysis and results-oriented solutions to help government leaders choose the best courses of action. Founded in 1942, CNA operates the Institute for Public Research and the Center for Naval Analyses, the federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps. CNA Strategic Studies (CSS), created in 2000, conducts high-quality research on and analysis of issues of strategic, regional, and policy importance. CSS’ analyses are based on objective, rigorous examination and do not simply echo conventional wisdom. CSS provides analytic support to U.S. Government organizations and the governments of partner countries. CSS also maintains notable foundation- sponsored and self-initiated research programs. CSS includes a Strategic Initiatives Group, an International Affairs Group, and a Center for Stability and Development. The Strategic Initiatives Group (SIG) looks at issues of U.S. national security, and military strategy, policy and operations, with a particular focus on maritime and naval aspects. SIG employs experts in historical analyses, futures planning, and long-term trend analysis based on scenario planning, to help key decision makers plan for the future. SIG specialties also include issues related to regional and global proliferation, deterrence theory, threat mitigation, and strategic planning for combating threats from weapons of mass destruction. The Strategic Studies Division is led by Vice President and Director Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • FORGOTTEN WATERS Minding the GIUK Gap a Tabletop Exercise
    MAY 2017 FORGOTTEN WATERS Minding the GIUK Gap A Tabletop Exercise Julianne Smith and Jerry Hendrix Foreword by Robert D. Kaplan CNAS Celebrating 10 Years About the Authors JULIANNE SMITH is a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) and Director of its Transatlantic Security Program. She previously served as the Deputy National Security Advisor to the Vice President of the United States and as the Principal Director for European and NATO Policy in the Office of the Secretary of Defense in the Pentagon. JERRY HENDRIX is a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security and Director of its Defense Strategies and Assessments Program. As a Captain in the United States Navy (now retired), his staff assignments include tours with the Chief of Naval Operation’s Executive Panel (N00K), the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, and the Office of Net Assessment. Most recently, he served as the Director of Naval History. Acknowledgements This report is the final product of a project entitled, “Forgotten Waters: Minding the GIUK Gap,” co-sponsored by the CNAS Transatlantic Security Program and the CNAS Defense Strategies and Assessments Program. This project was made possible by the generous support of the Ministries of Defense of Norway, the United Kingdom, and France. Although many people played crucial roles in the development and execution of this project, we would like to single out a few of our colleagues. We wish to thank our partners at the British, French, and Norwegian embassies in Washington, DC, including Steve McCarthy, Simond de Galbert, Keith Eikenes, and Harald Støren.
    [Show full text]