Prirodne Vrijednosti Općine Konjic / Download

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prirodne Vrijednosti Općine Konjic / Download PRIRODNE VRIJEDNOSTI OPĆINE KONJIC valorizacija & zaštita Udruženje za zaštitu okoline Zeleni Neretva Konjic PRIRODNE VRIJEDNOSTI OPĆINE KONJIC valorizacija & zaštita Ova brošua je nastala sa namjerom poticanja kvalitetnije promocije prirodnih vrijednosti šireg područja općine Konjic, a u cilju adekvatne valorizacije i institucionalne zaštite ovog područja. PRIRODNE PRIRODNE VRIJEDNOSTI činjenica jasno ilustrira prirodne vri- VRIJEDNOSTI PODRUČJA OPĆINE KONJIC jednosti općine, te navodimo neke od značajnijih prirodnih toponima: OPĆINE Područje općine Konjic se nalazi u sje- - planine: Prenj, Visočica, Bjelašnica, KONJIC vernoj Hercegovini, odnosno u plan- Bitovnja, Treskavica i dr.; inskom području Centralnih Dinarida. - rijeke: Neretva, Rakitnica, Ljuta, Ner- Ova općina je prostorno najveća u etvica, Lađanica, Baštica, Krupac, Bi- FBiH te sa veoma rijetkom naseljenosti jela, Kraljuštica, Trešanica i dr.; stanovništva. To je uglavnom planin- - jezera: Boračko, Jablaničko i Blatačko. sko područje izuzetnih prirodnih vri- jednosti koje je još uvijek nezagađeno Iako ovi podaci očito potenciraju i sačuvano u svom izvornom obliku. prirodne vrijednosti općine i daju sm- Visok stepen bioraznolikosti, kao i jernice u kojem pravcu bi se trebali hidrološki, geomorfološki i drugi prirod- okrenuti razvojni prioriteti, lokalne ni fenomeni koji krase ovo područje, vlasti nemaju jasan stav po pitanju danas predstavljaju ogroman po- valorizacije i zaštite vrijednih područja. tencijal – kako sa razvojnog tako Stoga, ovi prirodni potencijali još uvi- i sa ekološkog aspekta. Ipak, ako jek nisu adekvatno valorizovani u izuzmemo hidrološke potencijale, os- razvojnom smislu, što ide u prilog tale prirodne vrijednosti još uvijek nisu postojećem negativnom trendu prepoznate od strane lokalnih vlasti kao raseljavanja ruralnog stanovništva. resurs za dugotrajan i stabilan održivi Osnovni razlozi zašto prirodni poten- razvoj lokalne zajednice. Aktualnim cijali nisu stavljeni u funkciju održivog Prostornim planom FBiH predviđeno razvoja, između ostalog, leže u nedo- je da se skoro dvije trećine teritorija voljnoj promociji prirodnih potencijala, općine Konjic institucionalno zaštiti u needuciranosti lokalne zajednice, a vidu dva nacionalna parka (NP Prenj, naročito u dilemi lokalnih vlasti o tome Čvrsnica, Čabulja i NP Bjelašnica, Ig- kakav vid razvoja na ovim prirod- man, Treskavica, Visočica). Ova nim vrijednostima žele da provode. DILEME U VEZI KORIŠTENJA opstojnost drugog koncepta obzirom PRIRODNIH VRIJEDNOSTI da bi izgradnja velikih hidroenerget- skih objekata (radikalni građevinski Lokalne i federalne vlasti već duži zahvati u prostoru) drastično devalvi- period imaju velike dileme u vidu rala postojeće prirodne vrijednosti, a načina valorizacije i iskorištenja pome- na kojima se koncept održivog razvoja nutih prirodnih potencijala, odnosno primarno temelji. Ovakav vid razvoja načina razvoja područja na bazi ne daje dugoročne razvojne šanse ovih resursa. Sa jedne strane, pos- ruralnom stanovništvu i potiče trend toji koncept potpunog iskorištenja daljnjeg iseljavanja, iako se u javnos- postojećih hidroloških resursa u ener- ti pokušavaju nametnuti sasvim su- getskom cilju gradnje velikih hidroen- protne tvrdnje. Sa druge strane, kon- ergetskih postrojenja i proizvodnje el. cept održivog razvoja pruža realne i energije, dok sa druge strane postoji dugoročne razvojne šanse lokalnoj za- koncept održivog razvoja koji bi se jednici i ruralnom stanovništvu. Nara- zasnivao na održivom turizmu, organ- vno, ovakav vid „održivog“ (zelenog) skoj poljoprivredi, održivom šumarstvu, razvoja bi znatno zaustavio trend iselja- eksploataciji pitke vode i izgradnji vanja lokalnog, ruralnog stanovništva. obnovljivih izvora energije (mini hi- Također, ovakav koncept razvoja ne droelektrane, vjetro/solarne elektrane, zahtijeva velika početna inicijalna biomasa i dr.). Iako se ova dva kon- sredstva za ulaganje (i time smanjuje cepta u određenoj mjeri međusobno šanse za koruptivne radnje), a što nije nužno ne isključuju, ipak se sa razvo- slučaj sa velikim hidroenergetskim ob- jnog, sociološkog i ekološkog aspekta jektima. Mnoštvo pozitivnih primjera iz znatno razlikuju. Realizacija prvog kon- bližeg i daljeg okruženja daje za pra- cepta bi praktično dovela u pitanje vo zagovornicima ovog koncepta. ZAŠTITA PRIRODNIH VRIJEDNOSTI egzistenciju. Izuzetak predstavljaju KAO RAZVOJNA ŠANSA područja gdje se posljednjih godina „dogodio“ turizam, ali koji uglavnom Valorizacija i iskorištavanje prirodnih nije iniciran niti pomognut od strane potencijala na bazi održivog razvoja u vlasti i nadležnih službi već je nastajao direktnoj je sprezi sa institucionalnom spontano. Najbolji primjer je nagli raz- zaštitom vrijednih prirodnih područja. voj turističkih djelatnosti na rijeci Neret- Nažalost, iako ideja o zaštiti ovih vi (rafting, ugostiteljstvo, ribolov), a koji prostora datira još iz pedesetih go- danas predstavlja okosnicu turističke dina prošlog stoljeća, a u aktualnim ponude općine Konjic. Nažalost, loka- važećim prostornim planovima egzis- lno ruralno stanovništvo ima bojazan tira više od tri decenije, još uvijek nije od uspostavljanja planiranih zaštićenih došlo do uspostavljanja zaštite. Fra- područja. Njihova bojazan je u pojedin- pantna je činjenica da na prostoru od im aspektima opravdana, ali je ipak u cca 1400 km² općine Konjic u ovom većini slučajeva neopravdana, te je trenutku ne postoji niti jedan zaštićeni plod neinfomiranosti. Stoga je potreb- objekat prirodne vrijednosti na koji se no razviti aktivnosti usmjerene ka edu- primjenjuju posebne zakonske mjere kaciji lokalne zajednice o šansama i zaštite i upravljanja. U međuvremenu, mogućnostima za dugoročni održivi ovi prostori su izloženi raznim vrstama razvoj na ovim područjima. Promo- devastacije (nelegalna sječa, požari, cija prirodnih vrijednosti područja krivolov, divlja gradnja...) iz razloga što sjeverne Hercegovine – sa fokusom ne postoji zakonski mehanizam koji bi na planirana zaštićena područja na sačuvao ovo područje do konačne prostoru Konjica i okoline – znatno zaštite. Sa druge strane, mještani sa bi doprinjela prepoznavanju istih od ovih područja se intenzivno iseljavaju strane šire javnosti, a što bi u konačnici u gradove gdje najčešće ne pronal- omogućilo valorizaciju, ali i adekvatnu aze preduslove za osnovnu životnu institucionalnu zaštitu ovog prostora. GRANICA OPĆINE KONJIC Bitovnja Kraljuštica Neretvica Trešanica Jablaničko jezero Konjic Bjelašnica Ljuta Baštica Neretva Bijela Rakitnica Neretva Treskavica Fotografije koje su korištene u ovoj brošuri naprav- ljene su na širem Prenj Visočica području općine Boračko jezero Ljuta Konjic, odnosno na lokalitetima Krupac Vrelo koji su navedeni u ILUSTROVANA MAPA Lađanica Krupac ilustrovanoj mapi područja (Prenj, ŠIREG PODRUČJA GRANICA OPĆINE KONJIC OPĆINE KONJIC SA Neretva, Rakit- nica, Bjelašnica, NAZNAČENIM VRIJEDNIM Visočica, Ljuta, PRIRODNIM LOKALITETIMA Bitovnja, Boračko jezero, Krupac...). Crvanj PROMOVIRAJ DOMAĆE PRIRODNE VRIJEDNOSTI POŠALJI RAZGLEDNICU PROMOVIRAJ DOMAĆE PRIRODNE VRIJEDNOSTI POŠALJI RAZGLEDNICU IMPRESUM Izdavač Udruženje za zaštitu okoline Zeleni Neretva Konjic Autor Amir Variščić Udruženje Zeleni Neretva Konjic Omladinska 4, 88400 Konjic Tel/fax: +387 36 728 470 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.zeleni-neretva.ba Publikacija je realizovana u saradnji sa Fondacijom Heinrich Böll, Ured u BiH Fondacija Heinrich Böll, Ured u BiH Čekaluša 42, 71000 Sarajevo Tel/fax: +387 33 260 450 / 260 460 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.ba.boell.org Stavovi izraženi u ovoj publikaciji ne predstavljaju nužno stavove Fondacije Heinrich Böll.
Recommended publications
  • Izvještaj Strategijskoj Procjeni Uticaja Na Okoliš Za Izmjene I Dopune Regulacionog Plana
    IZVJEŠTAJ O STRATEGIJSKOJ PROCJENI UTICAJA NA OKOLIŠ ZA IZMJENE I DOPUNE REGULACIONOG PLANA „SPORTSKO-REKREACIONOG PODRUČJA BJELAŠNICA“ Oktobar, 2020. godina STRATEGIJSKA PROCJENAUTICAJA NA OKOLIŠ ZA IZMJENE I DOPUNE REGULACIONOG PLANA „SPORTSKO-REKREACIONOG PODRUČJA BJELAŠNICA“ IZVJEŠTAJ O STRATEGIJSKOJ PROCJENI UTICAJA NA OKOLIŠ ZA IZMJENE I DOPUNE REGULACIONOG PREDMET: PLANA „SPORTSKO-REKREACIONOG PODRUČJA BJELAŠNICA“ UGOVORNI ORGAN OPŠTINA TRNOVO -FINANSIJER : NOSILAC IZRADE "INSTITUT ZA GRAĐEVINARSTVO – IG", d.o.o. BANJA SPUO: LUKA NOSILAC IZRADE ZAVOD ZA PLANIRANJE RAZVOJA KANTONA - PLANA- SARAJEVO KOORDINATOR: Nebojša Knežević, vođa projekta Siniša Cukut, stručnjak za otpad Nevenko Samouković, stručnjak za vode Nenad Gaćeša, stručnjak za geologiju Milan Tešanović, stručnjak za GIS Bojana Ivić Župić, stručnjak za ekologiju UČESNICI U IZRADI : Ranka Pušić, dipl. biolog Snježana Savić, dipl. pro. planer Željka Stojanović, dipl. inž. polj. Nataša Grgić, dipl. inž. arh. Đorđe Gašić, dipl. ekolog Jelena Vučenović, dipl. ekolog DIREKTOR: _______________________ Doc. dr Nebojša Knežević 1 |Strana STRATEGIJSKA PROCJENAUTICAJA NA OKOLIŠ ZA IZMJENE I DOPUNE REGULACIONOG PLANA „SPORTSKO-REKREACIONOG PODRUČJA BJELAŠNICA“ SADRŽAJ: UVOD ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1 OPIS SADRŽAJA I CILJEVA PLANA, TE ODNOS PREMA DRUGIM PLANOVIMA ILI PROGRAMIMA ............................................................................. 10 1.1 Sadržaj i
    [Show full text]
  • Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
    SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Herpetofauna of the Prenj and Čvrsnica Mts. (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
    Original Scientific Paper Hyla VOL. 2014., No. 2, Str. 4 - 19 Šunje et al. 2014 ISSN: 1848-2007 Biodiversity of herpetofauna of the Prenj and Čvrsnica Mts. (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Bioraznolikost herpetofaune planina Prenj i Čvrsnica (Bosna i Hercegovina) 1 1 1 1 1 1 EMINA ŠUNJE* , ADNAN ZIMIĆ , BORIS STJEPANOVIĆ , BENJAMIN JUSIĆ , MIRZA ČENGIĆ , MAJA BRADARIĆ , 1 SAUDIN MERDAN 1Herpetological Association in Bosnia and Hercegovina ATRA, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Hercegovina; *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Herpetological research of the Prenj and Čvrsnica mountains has a relatively long tradition, but not enough scientific attention was devoted to them. Literature data on herpetofauna of Prenj and Čvrsnica is old, sporadic and rare. The aim of this research was to collect all data on the herpetofauna for the given mountains and determine the importance of the area for the herpetofaunal biodiversity of Bosnia and Herzegovina (B-H). The analysis of data showed that the area of Prenj and Čvrsnica is inhabited by 11 species of amphibians (55 % of the total number of amphibians in B-H) and 24 species of reptiles (83% of the total number of reptiles in B-H) which differ in vertical and horizontal distribution. The registered biodiversity is extremely high and is a consequence of the geographical position of these mountains which border the Mediterranean climate zone in B-H. Key words: distribution, submediterranean, amphibians, reptiles, biodiversity. Sažetak Herpetološka istraživanja planina Prenj i Čvrsnica imaju relativno dugu tradiciju, no znanje o njima još uvijek nije zadovoljavajuće. Literaturni podaci o herpetofauni Prenja i Čvrsnice su stari, sporadični i rijetki.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan for Rural Development of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2018-2021) - Framework Document
    STRATEGIC PLAN FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (2018-2021) - FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION Strategic Plan for Rural Development of BiH Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................................................. V 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT SITUATION IN THE SECTOR ............................................... 4 2.1. IMPORTANCE OF AGRICULTURE IN THE BIH ECONOMY ......................................................... 4 2.2. NATURAL RESOURCES AS THE BASIS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION................................. 5 2.3. FORESTRY .............................................................................................................................. 8 2.4. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 9 2.4.1. Plant production ....................................................................................................... 9 2.4.2. Livestock production ............................................................................................... 11 2.5. EQUIPMENT LEVEL OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS .............................................................. 15 2.6. FISHERIES ............................................................................................................................. 15 2.7. ORGANIC AND INTEGRATED
    [Show full text]
  • Географски И Метеоролошки Подаци Geographical and Meteorological Data
    No type Географски и метеоролошки подаци Geographical and meteorological data 15 Географски и метеоролошки подаци 2 Geographical and meteorological data Методолошка објашњења Methodological explanations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 ТАБЕЛЕ TABLES 2.1. Географске координате крајњих тачака Републике Српске Geographical coordinates of the extreme points of Republika Srpska ............................................................................................... 25 2.2. Дужина граница и површина Републике Српске Length of boundaries and surface area of Republika Srpska ........................................................................................................... 25 2.3. Језера и рибњаци Lakes and fishponds ......................................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.4. Планине и планински врхови Mountains and mountain peaks ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.5. Ријеке Rivers ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28 2.6. Јачи земљотреси, 1996–2015, са епицентрима на територији Републике Српске
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Series in Physical Environment 2
    Springer Series in Physical Environment 2 Managing Editor D. Barsch, Heidelberg Editors I. Douglas, Manchester' F. Joly, Paris M. Marcus, Tempe· B. Messerli, Bern Advisory Board F. Ahnert, Aachen' V. R. Baker, Tucson R. G. Barry, Boulder' H. Bremer, Knln D. Brunsden, London' R. U. Cooke, London' R. Co que, Paris Y. Dewolf, Paris' P. Fogelberg, Helsinki· O. Franzle, Kiel I. Gams, Ljubljana' A. Godard, Meudon' A. Guilcher, Brest H. Hagedorn, Wiirzburg' J. Ives, Boulder S. Kozarski, Poznan' H. Leser, Basel' J. R. Mather, Newark J. Nicod, Aix-en-Provence' A. R. Orme, Los Angeles G. 0strem, Oslo' T. L. Pewe, Tempe· P. Rognon, Paris H. Rohdenburgt, Braunschweig· A. Semmel, Frankfurt/Main G. SUiblein, Bremen' H. Svensson, K0benhavn M. M. Sweeting, Oxford' R. W. Young, Wollongong Ognjen Bonacci Karst Hydrology With Special Reference to the Dinaric Karst With 119 Figures Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Professor Dr. OGNJEN BONACCI Civil Engineering Institute Faculty of Civil Engineering Sciences University of Split 58000 Split, V. Maslese b.b. Yugoslavia Translated by Zjena Vidovic-Culic ISBN-13: 978-3-642-83167-6 e-ISBN-13: 978-3-642-83165-2 DOl: 10.1007/978-3-642-83165-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Bonacci, Ognjen, 1942- Karst hydrology, with special reference to the Dinaric karst. (Springer series in physical environment ; 2) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Hydrology, Karst. 2. Hydrology, Karst-Dinaric Alps. I. Title. II. Series. GB843.B66 1987 551.49 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illus­ trations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and stor­ age in data banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA May, 2014 BASIC INFORMATION Project Title Support to Bosnia and Herzegovina for the Revision of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP BiH) and Development of the Fifth National Report to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) Project Acronym NBSAP BiH Project Duration Period January 2013 – December 2014 GEF Implementation United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP Agency GEF Operational Focal Point Senad Oprašić, PhD, Head of the Environmental Protection for Bosnia and Herzegovina Department at the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina (MoFTER BiH) UNCBD Focal Point for BiH Mehmed Cero, M. Sc., Assistant Minister in the Environment Sector of the FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MoET FBiH) 2 Client: FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism Supported by: United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP External Associate Experts: Senka Barudanović Stjepan Matić Radoslav Dekić Dragojla Golub Consultant: Centre for Energy, Environment and Resources (CENER 21) Translation and Proofreading: Gordana Lonco Edina Dmitrović Graphic Design: Tarik Hodžić 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank the following institutions for the support that they provided in the development of the Fifth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) and through their participation in workshops, provision of data, information, comments and suggestions: Aarhus Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaculture Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    27 Aquaculture development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Jasmin Omeragić Veterinary Faculty Veterinary Faculty of the University of Sarajevo Zmaja od Bosne 90, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina [email protected] Omeragić, J. 2009. Aquaculture development in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In M.G. Bondad-Reantaso, J.R. Arthur and R.P. Subasinghe (eds). Strengthening aquaculture health management in Bosnia and Herzegovina. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 524. Rome, FAO. pp 27–33. ABSTRACT Bosnia and Herzegovina has a very long and rich tradition in aquaculture. Important advantages that the country possesses for the development of aquaculture include abundant clean water, high-quality, educated and cheap labour, high capability of fish processing factories, and the high quality of its hatcheries. Thanks to these and other factors, Bosnia and Herzegovina has a great potential for increasing national aquaculture production. During the war period of 1991–1995, the majority of the fish farms were destroyed along with their entire infrastructure. After the war, the process of privatization started, leading to an increase in fish production. The privatization of the fish farms, which since 1995 were in the possession of the State, has broadened the possibilities for aquaculture development in the country, including the use of new technologies, the expansion of capacity and the production of high-quality feeds. The export of fish and fish products from Bosnia and Herzegovina to European Union markets as officially permitted by EU Decision 2008/156/EC is the most important success of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s agriculture sector in the post-war period. INTRODUCTION Bosnia and Herzegovina is located in the Western Balkans region and has a total surface area of 51 209.2 km2, of which land accounts for 51 197 km2 and sea accounts for 12.2 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]
  • Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)
    E1468 Consulting Services for Environment Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized in the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) No. TF052845/GE-P084608 Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L EIA R E P O R T Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sarajevo/Banja Luka, August 2006 Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia Proposed Integrated Ecosystem Management of the Nerteva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) Project Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms EXECUTIVE SUMMARY List of Tables List of Pictures List of Annexes References 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................14 1.1. Background .............................................................................................. 14 1.2. Project objectives..................................................................................... 15 1.3. Project components ................................................................................. 16 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................21 2.1. Overall Project Implementation Arrangements....................................... 21 2.2. Requirements of the WB .......................................................................... 22 2.3. Bosnia and Herzegovina environmental policy ........................................ 23 2.4. Legislation of Republic of Croatia ............................................................ 26 2.5. Evaluation of project environmental aspects .................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina – Montenegro – Kosovo the Best-Value Skiing and Snowboarding Opportunities in the Whole of Europe!
    Ref document – Lot 1: Ski touring in cross-border areas in Western Balkan FAM Tour Program List of proposed travel industry partners to participate in FAM Tour Bosnia and Herzegovina – Montenegro – Kosovo The best-value skiing and snowboarding opportunities in the whole of Europe! 1. FAM TOUR PROGRAM: Details of the tour: Discover the winter magic of some of the most spectacular mountains of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Kosovo*. In this tour we will explore different mountains and go off the beaten track. Get ready to cover a variety of terrain and experience some of the Balkan wilderness. Our adventure week starts in the city of Sarajevo which is surrounded by four Olympic Mountains of Trebević, Jahorina, Igman and Bjelašnica, as well as Treskavica and Romanija. The Mountains of Montenegro are located in a series of epic landscapes so diverse it doesn’t seem possible that they are all part of the same country. Snow-capped, jagged peaks morph into gentle, rolling alpine pastures and then plunge earthwards from glacial lakes into twisting, narrow gorges, hiding remote villages in summer and in winter. Prokletije area, and in particular Hajla mountain located between Kosovo* and Montenegro, which we will visit, has several peaks that reach over 2,000 m. Hajla (2403 m) is the highest mountain in the northern part of the Accursed Mountains. Some of the peaks we will ski near are: Prenj 1850 m, Veliki Osobac 2024 m, Hajla 2100 - 2403 m Clarification on the level of difficulties: The area between Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Kosovo* is surrounded by high peaks and jagged landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Touristic Movement in Jahorina Mountain from 1999 to 2016
    TOURISTIC MOVEMENT IN JAHORINA MOUNTAIN FROM 1999 TO 2016 Emilija Dostović Abstract: Mountain Jahorina – a so called “snow beauty”, represents one of the largest ski and winter resorts in the Balkans. During the 14th Winter Olympic Games in 1984 this region has reached considerable touristic development. The one thing that separates Jahorina as a Winter Olympic Center from the rest is the sheer quality of ski tracks located on site, which are suitable for professionals and beginners alike. Apart from skiing activities, visitors can enjoy the natural scenery that this region has to offer. The mild climate, rich hydrography, lush flora and fauna and anthropogenic values can be found here as well. This is a place where Western and Eastern civilizations meet, sometimes even collide but they enrich this region together nonetheless through their long and fascinating history. After the Winter Olympic Games, a three-year civil war, the economic crisis that followed and basic negligence has resulted in a decline of visitors during the years. This area also suffered from a decline of infrastructure capital and material base, reduction of birth rate and emigration of the population. This research shows that Jahorina has a good potential to be a regional tourist centre that could be attractive for visiting at any time of the year. Key factors for a recent tourism development of mountain Jahorina as well as the increase of visitors in the period from 1999 and information about existing infrastructure is shown in the next pages of this paper. As an increase of visitors is apparent in recent time, it gives hope and motive for further work on infrastructure and capacity development for sports, winter and summer activities.
    [Show full text]