Carlo Maratti and the Barberini Family: Two Paintings for Churches in Palestrina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Carlo Maratti and the Barberini Family: Two Paintings for Churches in Palestrina Carlo Maratti and the Barberini family: two paintings for churches in Palestrina by GIOVAN BATTISTA FIDANZA IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY, Palestrina, about 40 kilometres east of Rome, was the main town of an important principal- ity, which in 1630 was acquired by the Barberini family from Francesco Colonna.1 It is not widely known that Carlo Maratti (1625–1713) painted two altarpieces for churches in Palestrina. One, which has not survived, was for the high altar of S. Rosa- lia, the other for the church of the Annunciation. The first of Maratti’s biographers to mention the S. Rosalia painting was G.P. Bellori (1613–96), who accurately describes its subject, S. Rosalia interceding for victims of the plague in Palestrina. He also states that the painting was commissioned by Prince Maffeo Barberini (1631–85), whose palace was attached to the church of S. Rosalia, to fulfil a vow made by the town council during an outbreak of plague in 1656, when the people prayed to S. Rosalia of Palermo, known for her protection from epidemics. Bellori adds that the painting had already been moved to Palazzo Barberini in Rome and replaced with a copy by Francesco Reale, whom Bellori de- scribes as a pupil of Maratti. According to Bellori, this transfer was made for reasons of conservation, above all because the can- vas was in direct contact with the rock on which the church was built.2 Regarding the date of the painting, Bellori writes only that it was executed after the epidemic. Of Maratti’s other biographers, Francesco Saverio Baldi- nucci (1663–1738), writing around 1725–30, adds no useful in- formation about the date of the altarpiece. He simply describes and praises the canvas, which he wrongly believed had been commissioned by Cardinal Antonio Barberini (1607–71).3 Lione Pascoli (1674–1744) believed that Maratti painted the altarpiece during the papacy of Alexander VII (reg.1655–67), while he was restoring an old painting in Palazzo Barberini and executing a series of paintings of the Apostles commis- sioned by the cardinal. The first of this series, St Peter, was the work of Andrea Sacchi, after whose death the commission was 4 12. S. Rosalia interceding for victims of the plague in Palestrina , by Carlo Maratti. continued by Maratti. Anna Lo Bianco has demonstrated that 1668. Canvas, dimensions unknown. (Formerly Palazzo Corsini, Florence, Maratti painted the majority of these canvases – St Paul, St destroyed; photograph 1934). James the Great, St James the Less, St Bartholomew, St Matthew the Evangelist and St Simon – between 1666 and 1671,5 but a further Pascoli’s contention that the Palestrina altarpiece and the Apos- two were painted later. According to Pascoli, Maratti executed tles were carried out for the Barberini family at the same time eleven Apostles in all, but does not give a precise date for them. could refer to the group painted in 1666–71. I would like to thank my friends and colleagues Nicoletta Marconi, Roberta Palestrina’, in idem, ed.: La chiesa di Santa Rosalia. La cappella dei principi Barberini Iacono and Luigi Cacciaglia. Thanks also to Sonja Brink, Sabina Marinetti, Agos- a Palestrina, Palestrina 2015, pp.15–17. tino Oliva, His Excellency Domenico Sigalini, Bishop of Palestrina, Fr. Ludovico 2 G.P. Bellori: Le vite de’ pittori, scultori e architetti moderni, ed. E. Borea, Turin Borzi, parish priest of the Cathedral of Palestrina, Monsignor Vito Cinti, Canon 1976, p.589. of the Cathedral of Palestrina, and Monsignor Felicetto Gabrielli. The technical 3 F.S. Baldinucci: Vite di artisti dei secoli XVII–XVIII, ed. A. Matteoli, Rome investigations were carried out by Emmebi Diagnostica Artistica of Rome: special 1975, p.298. thanks to Marco Cardinali and Maria Beatrice De Ruggieri for their valuable 4 L. Pascoli: Vite de’ pittori, scultori, ed architetti moderni, ed. A. Marabottini, Peru- advice. This research has been undertaken as part of the Smart Campus project, gia 1992, pp.204-05. supervised by the Vice-President of the University of Rome Tor Vergata, Profes- 5 A. Lo Bianco: Carlo Maratti e gli ‘Apostoli’ Barberini, in L. Barroero et al., eds: sor Maurizio Talamo, to whom I express my gratitude. Maratti e l’Europa, Rome 2015, p.229. 1 R. Iacono: ‘La chiesa di Santa Rosalia. La cappella privata dei Barberini a 6 L. Cecconi: Storia di Palestrina città del prisco Lazio, Ascoli 1756, p.375. Mezzetti 610 a u g u s t 2017 • c l i x • t h e b u r l i n g t o n m a g a z i n e LAY_FIDANZA_Maratti.indd 610 19/07/2017 16:55 CARLO MARATTI AND THE BARBERINI FAMILY 13. Annunciation, by Carlo Maratti and workshop. 1686. Canvas, 223.5 by 173 cm. 14. Ultraviolet photograph of Fig.13. (Cathedral of Palestrina). The dating of the S. Rosalia altarpiece (the church had only to unspecified undertakings), which shows that from 15th one altar) is resolved by documents in the Barberini archive. November 1657 to February 1660 just over 4,000 scudi had It was completed in October 1668, when Rugino Cappelloni, been spent on construction.8 Work on the church’s decoration Maffeo Barberini’s accountant, paid Maratti 300 scudi for the was in progress some years before the altarpiece was commis- painting (see Appendix 1 below). Pascoli’s reference to Alexander sioned. In 1666 Maffeo paid the considerable sum of 840 scudi, VII, who died in 1667, might therefore be connected to the date 35 baiocchi to the stonemason Giovanni Battista Borsella for the altarpiece was commissioned. Unaware of this document, work inside the church, which was overseen by its architect, scholars have generally dated the painting to around 1660, Francesco Contini (1599–1669). Maffeo also paid 150 scudi to thanks to a statement by a historian of Palestrina, Leonardo a certain Giuseppe Ceccolani for marble decoration for the Cecconi, that the church of S. Rosalia was completed in that high altar.9 This suggests that the structure that would house year.6 However, Cecconi states only that the first mass was Maratti’s picture was then undergoing a complete remodel- celebrated in the church on 7th November 1660, without ling, since the previous altar was made of wood and painted in saying that its construction had been completed or, more im- chiaroscuro in 1659.10 Maratti’s canvas replaced an altarpiece portantly, that Maratti’s painting was already above the altar. by Leonardo De Sanctis, who was paid 9 scudi, 23 baiocchi for According to another historian of Palestrina, Pietrantonio it by Maffeo on 31st October 1662.11 As well as being a medio- Petrini, S. Rosalia was completed in 1677,7 but its construction cre painter, De Sanctis was an art dealer, who in 1631 counted was begun in 1657, confirmed by the earliest evidence of pay- Taddeo Barberini (1603–47) among his clients.12 The need to ments connected to the building work (a final account relating provide a painting of higher quality than that by De Sanctis was the first to propose this date: A. Mezzetti: ‘Contributi a Carlo Maratti’,Rivista Computisteria, 373, Giornale BB 1658–1660 (Principe Maffeo Barberini), fol.202r. Ac- dell’Istituto Nazionale d’Archeologia e Storia dell’Arte 4 (1955), pp.265 and 323, which cording to Gampp, op. cit. (note 6), p.352, the first payments for the construction was accepted by Borea, op. cit. (note 2), p.589, and A.C. Gampp: ‘Santa Rosalia of the church are dated February 1658. in Palestrina. Die Grablege der Barberini und das ästhetische Konzept der “Mag- 9 BAV, Archivio Barberini, Computisteria, 373/B, Giornale DD 1665–1670 nificentia”’, Römisches Jahrbuch der Bibliotheca Hertziana 29 (1994), p.357. A date of (Principe Maffeo Barberini), pp.167 and 178. between 1657 and 1660 was proposed by L. Bortolotti: ‘Carlo Maratti (Maratta)’, 10 Gampp, op. cit. (note 6), p.352, with previous bibliography. Dizionario biografico degli italiani, Rome 2007, LXIX, p.445, which was accepted by 11 BAV, Archivio Barberini, Computisteria, 366, Libro Mastro del Principe Maffeo A. Fralleoni: ‘Francesco Reali e la pala d’altare di Santa Rosalia’, in Iacono, op. cit. Barberini (1661–1664), fol.217v. (note 1), pp.31–32. The only scholar to date the painting to the year of the plague 12 On Leonardo De Sanctis, see L. Calenne: ‘La poliedrica attività del “coloraro” was P. Collura: Santa Rosalia nella storia e nell’arte, Palermo 1977, p.81. Leonardo De Sanctis all’ombra del Cardinale Federico Sforza, ed alcune novità su 7 P. Petrini: Memorie Prenestine disposte in forma di Annali, Rome 1795, p.259. Agostino Verrocchi e sull’esordio romano di Mattia e Gregorio Preti’, in M. Gal- 8 Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana (cited hereafter as BAV), Archivio Barberini, lo, ed.: I Cardinali e l’Arte. Rome 2013, II, pp.67–95, with previous bibliography. t h e b u r l i n g t o n m a g a z i n e • c l i x • a u g u s t 2017 611 LAY_FIDANZA_Maratti.indd 611 19/07/2017 16:56 CARLO MARATTI AND THE BARBERINI FAMILY painting was moved to Rome during the papacy of Clement X (1670–76), a suggestion that is supported by new document- ary evidence. On 22nd June 1675 Reale was paid 49 scudi by Maffeo for copying three pictures, including a S. Rosalia, which is almost certainly Maratti’s Palestrina painting (the others were a portrait of an unspecified king of Spain and a small painting whose subject is unknown).18 Baldinucci states that the purported bad state of the altar- piece was only a pretext for moving it to Palazzo Barberini.
Recommended publications
  • Falda's Map As a Work Of
    The Art Bulletin ISSN: 0004-3079 (Print) 1559-6478 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rcab20 Falda’s Map as a Work of Art Sarah McPhee To cite this article: Sarah McPhee (2019) Falda’s Map as a Work of Art, The Art Bulletin, 101:2, 7-28, DOI: 10.1080/00043079.2019.1527632 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.2019.1527632 Published online: 20 May 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 79 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rcab20 Falda’s Map as a Work of Art sarah mcphee In The Anatomy of Melancholy, first published in the 1620s, the Oxford don Robert Burton remarks on the pleasure of maps: Methinks it would please any man to look upon a geographical map, . to behold, as it were, all the remote provinces, towns, cities of the world, and never to go forth of the limits of his study, to measure by the scale and compass their extent, distance, examine their site. .1 In the seventeenth century large and elaborate ornamental maps adorned the walls of country houses, princely galleries, and scholars’ studies. Burton’s words invoke the gallery of maps Pope Alexander VII assembled in Castel Gandolfo outside Rome in 1665 and animate Sutton Nicholls’s ink-and-wash drawing of Samuel Pepys’s library in London in 1693 (Fig. 1).2 There, in a room lined with bookcases and portraits, a map stands out, mounted on canvas and sus- pended from two cords; it is Giovanni Battista Falda’s view of Rome, published in 1676.
    [Show full text]
  • Pietro Da Cortona in Nineteenth-Century Children's
    The Painter and the Scullery Boy: Pietro da Cortona in Nineteenth-Century Children’s Literature* Lindsey Schneider Pietro Berrettini (1597-1669), called Pietro da Cortona, was one of the most influential artists in seventeenth-century Italy and was celebrated as the premier decorative painter of his generation, most notably for his ceiling in the Barberini Palace in Rome (1633-39). His reputation began to suffer soon after his death, however, due in large part to changing standards of taste that no longer tolerated the extravagances of the High Baroque style that he helped to develop and with which he is indelibly linked.1 In 1692 the director of the French Academy in Rome, Matthieu de La Teulière, reported back to Paris that, ‘Pietro da Cortona and his school have spread such great debauchery here, operating under the guise of virtuosity, *<+ giving everything over to the whims of their imaginations,’2 and made similar statements the following year, in which he charged Cortona, Bernini and Borromini with ruining the fine arts with their excess.3 This view endured over the ensuing centuries and the trope of the Baroque as a diseased and cancerous style – with Cortona as one of its prime vectors of transmission – became commonplace in art-theoretical literature. Nearly a century after La Teulière, Francesco Milizia vilified the same trio of artists, saying that Cortona, along with Borromini and Bernini, ‘represent a diseased taste – one that has infected a great number of artists’.4 In London around the same time, James Barry singled Cortona
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Architecture in Italy 1600 to 1750
    RUDOLF WITTKOWER ART AND ARCHITECTURE IN ITALY 1600 TO 1750 PUBLISHED BY PENGUIN BOOKS CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES XI LIST OF PLATES X1U FOREWORD XXI Part One The Period of Transition and the Early Baroque circa 1600-circa 162$ 1. ROME: SIXTUS V TO PAUL V (1585-1621) I The Council of Trent and the Arts - The Church and the Reformers - The 'Style Sixtus V and its Transformation - Paul V and Cardinal Scipione Borghese as Patrons - Caravaggios and Annibale Carracci s Supporters - The new Churches and the new Iconography - The Evolution of the 'Genres' 2. CARAVAGGIO 21 3. THE CARRACCI 31 4. CARAVAGGIO'S FOLLOWERS AND THE CARRACCI SCHOOL IN ROME 42 The Caravaggisti - The Bolognese in Rome and Early Baroque Classicism 5. PAINTING OUTSIDE ROME 55 Bologna and Neighbouring Cities 56 Florence and Siena 59 Milan 61 Genoa 64 Venice 65 Conclusion 67 6. ARCHITECTURE AND SCULPTURE 69 Architecture 69 Rome: Carlo Maderno (1556-1629) - Architecture outside Rome Sculpture 83 Rome - Sculpture outside Rome vii CONTENTS Part Two The Age of the High Baroque circa 1625-circa 167 s 7. INTRODUCTION 89 Seicento Devotion and Religious Imagery - Rhetoric and Baroque Procedure - Patronage 8. GIANLORENZO BERNINI 96 Introduction 96 Sculpture 97 Stylistic Development - Sculpture with One and Many Views - Colour and Light - The Transcending of Traditional Modes - New Iconographical Types - The Role of the 'Concetto' - Working Procedure Painting 112 Architecture 114 Ecclesiastical Buildings - Secular Buildings - The Piazza of St Peter's 9. FRANCESCO BORROMINI (1599-1667) I3O S. Carlo alle Quattro Fontane - S. Ivo della Sapienza - S. Giovanni in Laterano, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Raphael in Rome. Style, Technique, Conservation
    Raphael in Rome. Style, technique, conservation The restoration of the frescoes carried out in the This publication is the result of the skilful work Vatican’s Stanza della Segnatura and Stanza di Eliodoro, undertaken by several specialists, within the Vatican and on the Madonna del Divino Amore in the Capodimonte outside. Museum in Naples, and on La Perla and Lo Spasimo in the Prado in Madrid, and the programme of technical The studies proposed at the 2014 conference are now investigations which has run alongside this work, has available for the many interested people who were made a substantial body of documentary material unable to attend the meeting or who wish to refresh available. New academic hypotheses formulated on the RRaphael in Rome their knowledge of what was said at the time. basis of these materials are here discussed by specialists in problems concerning Raphael and early sixteenth- SStyle, technique, conservation The editors of this work have been able to harmonize century Italian painting. contributions that present different aspects of Raphael, The fruits of the dialogue between art historians and the master of the Vatican Rooms, into a coherent text, restorers, the texts and the sensational photographic important for studies on Raphael. documentation that we present in this volume, allow us to look with new eyes and from a previously unexplored Barbara Jatta angle – but one which in some cases, as we have seen, boasts very early precedents – at the grand unfolding of stylistic development and inspired inventiveness in Raphael’s technical researches. Barbara Agosti and Silvia Ginzburg ISBN 978-88-8271-395-9 EDIZIONI MUSEI VATICANI € 59,00 Foreword Barbara Agosti, Silvia Ginzburg In the papers developed for this volume, restorers and art historians propose the results of conservation and research focused on works that represent some of the most significant stages in Raphael’s Roman period, beginning in 1508 and concluding with his death in 1520.
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo in Rome: the Rise and Fall of a Troublesome Genius (2004) By: William R
    Galileo in Rome: The Rise and Fall of a Troublesome Genius (2004) by: William R. Shea & Mariano Artigas Review on Galileo’s Fifth and Sixth Trip to Rome Maria Briones 1. Overview William R. Shea is a professor of history of science in the University of Padua located in Italy, and Mariano Artigas is both a physicist and a Roman Catholic Priest.1 Shea and Artigas decided to connect their extensive knowledge in order to collaborate together and publish a book counteracting the overall dominant response of the Galileo affair. The Galileo affair is often seen as a black/white dilemma in which the Roman Catholic Church was at complete fault for persecuting Galileo based on his revolutionary discoveries, while Galileo, on the other hand, is often, and almost naturally, seen as being completely innocent of a genuine wrongdoing. Traveling back in time and analyzing each of the six trips Galileo took to Rome, Shea and Artigas attempt to find flaw in the black/white logic by pointing out life changing mistakes Galileo made during the course of his lifetime and ultimately put together an argument stating that, although the Roman Catholic Church was at fault, Galileo played an equal part in digging his own grave. Although Shea and Artigas discuss the six trips made to Rome, this review will cover the most controversial chapters; trips five and six are covered in their respective chapter (five and six) and highlight the argument attempted by the authors. 2. Background !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 Pg. xi Galileo’s fifth trip to Rome was when he was just over 60-years-old and took place on May 3rd 1630, lasting a little over a month until June 26th.2 During this time, Galileo published The Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems; a play in four acts about three friends (Filippo Salvati, Giovanfrancesco Sagredo, and Simplicio).
    [Show full text]
  • Grabmalskultur Und Soziale Strategien Im Frühneuzeitlichen Rom Am Beispiel Der Familie Papst Urbans VIII
    Grabmalskultur und soziale Strategien im frühneuzeitlichen Rom am Beispiel der Familie Papst Urbans VIII. Barberini Autor(en): Köchli, Ulrich Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Zeitschrift für schweizerische Kirchengeschichte = Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique suisse Band (Jahr): 97 (2003) PDF erstellt am: 11.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-130330 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Grabmalskultur und soziale Strategien im frühneuzeitlichen Rom am Beispiel der Familie Papst Urbans Vili. Barberini Ulrich Köchli Wer je die römische Petersbasilika mit offenen Augen durchmessen hat, dem werden die zahlreichen, zum Teil monumentalen Grablegen vergangener Päpste in Erinnerung geblieben sein.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/29/2021 02:20:15AM Via Free Access 20 Prologue in Private Notes, Only
    prologue GIACINTO GIGLI, CHRONICLER, OR: POWER IN THE STREETS OF ROME Introduction High culture, low culture—elite and populace. Such constructed oppo- sites have haunted the pages of cultural history for the past decades, and although the more sophisticated practitioners of the genre already seem to have abandoned them for a more integralist stance, the di- chotomy still dominates the imagination. The study of Roman culture seems especially characterized by this divisive image: the refined civ- ilization of the papal court, manifest in the grandiose monuments of the arts, of literature and of music—the culture of a group who can- not have numbered more than a few thousand people, mostly men— at times seems a completely different world from the life of the other 90.000 or so Romans who made up the capital of the Papal States and of Catholic Christendom in a normal year. But do we actually now how an ‘ordinary’ Roman, who did not really belong to this upper class, looked upon ‘The Town’, his town? The title of this Prologue shows I work from the assumption that who- ever chronicled life in papal Rome would be primarily preoccupied with power. Indeed, after a first glance at the available material, I felt that such persons were indeed so inclined: most of the sources that fall in the category of texts chronicling the Town’s daily life seem to record the many visible manifestations of power: power temporal, power spir- itual and, of course, power supernatural. They concern the rituals of a capital that was excessively attuned to the outward manifestations of the complex power system that, within the theatre that was Rome, cen- tred around the pope, his family and all the other persons and institu- tions that, together, embodied the Church which was the vessel of those powers.
    [Show full text]
  • Domenichino's Scenes from the Life
    DOMENICHINO’S SCENES FROM THE LIFE OF ST. CECILIA: ARTISTIC INTERPRETATION AND THE COUNTER-REFORMATION by Emily Freeman Bachelor of Arts, 2005 The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas Submitted to the Faculty Graduate Division of the College of Fine Arts Texas Christian University in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2008 DOMENICHINO’S SCENES FROM THE LIFE OF ST. CECILIA: ARTISTIC INTERPRETATION AND THE COUNTER-REFORMATION Thesis approved: Major Professor, Dr. Babette Bohn Dr. Mark Thistlethwaite Dr. Nadia Lahutsky Graduate Studies Representative For the College of Fine Arts ii Copyright © 2008 by Emily Freeman All Rights Reserved iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations.................................................................................................. v Introduction............................................................................................................. 1 St. Cecilia and the Revival of Her Cult................................................................... 4 St. Cecilia in Art and Literature............................................................................ 13 Early Life and the Carracci Academy................................................................... 22 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 43 Images................................................................................................................... 45 Bibliography ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Painters Voyage of Italy : in Which All the Most Famous Paintings of The
    'f - '/-'«' ';/-.€ t£f, a. ^ 0^ O . - y: DireSions to place the Sculptures. 1. The Frontifpiece before the Title, 2. The Map of Italy before the Table, 5. Michael Angelo. Pag. 17. 4. Titian. p. 50. 5. Paulo Veronefe, p. ii2. 6. Pietro de Cortona, p;ii7. 7. Raphael Urbin. P«i59» A Licenfed, Decemb.6. .678. Koger VEftrange. THE PAINTERS VOYAGE I T A L Y. IN WHICH All the famous Paintings of the moft emi- nent Mafters are particularifed, as they are preferved in the feveral Cities of IT ALT, Chiefly relating to Their Altar-pieces, and luch other Paint- ings as arc Ornamental in their Churches. And Alfo Many choice Pidiures, kept as Jewels, in the Palaces of particular perfons. Whereijnto is added That excellent Colledion of Signior 5EPr.4LE,inhisCIoret at MILAN. Iliailraced with The Heads of forae of the moft renowned Painters. Written Originally in- //fl/i<j?z by Giacomo Barri ^Venetian Painter. Englifhed by W.L, of Lincolu5-Imne,Gent. - L N:pON, Printed for Tho, Flejhtr^ at the Angel and Crown in S. Fauls Church-yard. i6yp. -^ T O The Right Honourable THOMAS, LordBELLASIS, Vifcount FAVLCONBERG. My Lord, WHen I had the ho- nour to attend your Lordjhip in your Embajfy to the States of Venice^ it was my fortune A 4 there ^ The Epiftle Dedicatory. there to meet with a [mail Piece entitukd Viaggio Pittorefco d Italia, the Tas\ being ofno very great difficulty^ and alto- gether agreeable to my, own in- (lination^ I have gratified pty [elf- and I hop not difobliged ingenious Artifls in a faithful rendition of it into Engliflij which I have done the rather hecaufe the Boo\ ir rarely to he found in Italy, and 1 can- not remember I have feen any Original in England but that which is in my own hands.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Vite De Giovanni Pietro Bellori (1672) : Entre Valorisation Et Dispersion Du Patrimoine Vasarien
    LES VITE DE GIOVANNI PIETRO BELLORI (1672) : ENTRE VALORISATION ET DISPERSION DU PATRIMOINE VASARIEN Ismène COTENSIN Dans la conclusion de 1568 des Vite, Giorgio Vasari s’adresse à ses confrères artistes et laisse entendre que des successeurs éventuels pourraient écrire la suite de son ouvrage : « chi scriverà il rimanente di questa istoria potrà farlo con più grandezza e maestà »1. Cette phrase révèle l’optimisme final qui anime la seconde édition des Vite : la confiance en un avenir glorieux pour les arts. Giovanni Pietro Bellori est l’un de ceux qui exauce le vœu de Giorgio Vasari. Figure centrale de la Rome artistique du XVIIe siècle, réputé pour son érudition et ses nombreuses publications sur les monnaies et les médailles antiques, Bellori a exercé plusieurs charges prestigieuses, dont celles de conservateur des Antiquités pour la cour papale, premier recteur de l’Académie de Saint-Luc, et antiquaire et gardien de la collection de médailles de la reine Christine de Suède. Bellori nous intéresse particulièrement parce qu’il est l’auteur du recueil de Vies d’artistes intitulé, Le Vite de’ pittori, scultori ed architetti moderni, publié à Rome en 1672, soit un siècle après l’édition Giuntina. Bellori entretient un rapport ambigu avec Vasari : dans l’Avis au lecteur, il affirme vouloir prendre ses distances avec Vasari et, dit-il, tous ceux qui ont fait un éloge exagéré des Florentins et des Toscans. En ne sélectionnant que douze artistes pour composer son recueil, Bellori rompt également avec la dimension presque encyclopédique des Vite de Vasari. Néanmoins, l’ouvrage de cet auteur romain reste empreint du paradigme établi un siècle plus tôt.
    [Show full text]
  • Cbc Conservazione Beni Culturali
    DIPINTI SU TELA CBC CONSERVAZIONE BENI CULTURALI La Cooperativa CBC Conservazione Beni Culturali si è costituita nel 1977 tra restauratori provenienti dai corsi dell'Istituto Centrale del Restauro. E' attualmente formata da diciotto soci, il cui curriculum di studio è consultabile su questo sito. Opera sia per Enti pubblici (Soprintendenze regionali, Comuni, Musei Civici, etc.), che per privati, anche come strutture od Enti, sia in Italia che all’estero. Nel seguente curriculum si dà conto dettagliatamente dell'attività svolta nel settore specifico, suddivisa e ordinata per anno di esecuzione. Presso la sua sede laboratorio sono consultabili le documentazioni sia scritte che fotografiche dei lavori svolti, di cui è stata consegnata copia ai committenti; alcuni lavori sono inoltre stati oggetto di approfondimento e pubblicazione. Contatti Sede legale e laboratorio in Laboratorio in Via dei Priori, 84 Viale Manzoni, 26 - 00185 Roma 06123 Perugia Tel: 06-70.49.52.82 fax: 06-77.200.500 Tel: 075-57.31.532 Mail: [email protected] Mail: [email protected] Sito: www.cbccoop.it FB: @cbccoop Dati Amministrativi Codice Fiscale e numero d’iscrizione al Registro delle Imprese di Roma: N. 02681720583 P.IVA: N. 01101321006 – R.E.A. di Roma: N. 413625 del 12.03.1977 Albo Provinciale delle Imprese Artigiane: N. 133916 del 05.06.1980 Albo delle Società Cooperative al n. A125967 del 23/03/2005 Attestazione di qualificazione alla esecuzione dei lavori pubblici n. 7969/58/01 rilasciata dalla ITALSOA SpA per la Categoria OS2A Classifica IV. DIPINTI SU TELA
    [Show full text]
  • Preface (Brief Explanation of What This Thing Is and Isn't)
    Preface In his lifetime, Marc’Antonio Pasqualini’s international fame rested on his singing, and at present count his name appears as the composer on only forty-eight seventeenth-century copies of chamber cantatas.1 At his death in 1691, however, the singer’s personal music library, which included eight volumes of cantatas written for the most part in his own hand, passed to Urbano Barberini, prince of Palestrina and the great-nephew of Marc’Antonio’s patron, Cardinal Antonio Barberini, the younger.2 This is the reason they were among the 115 manuscripts of music that the Vatican Library acquired when it purchased the Barberini library in 1902. In the twentieth century, several music historians considered these eight volumes as copies of music by unknown composers—or by Luigi Rossi—that the singer had written out for his own use.3 But they contain not only concordances with forty-two of the forty-eight cantatas that bear Pasqualini’s name, but three of them also preserve, not duplicate copies, but rather compositional drafts for many of the forty-eight and for nearly another one hundred cantatas. In addition, Pasqualini’s hand as composer and editor shows up in several other Barberini music manuscripts, indicating that these, too, must have been in his possession fifty to sixty years before his death. The Annotated List of Sources, part A (in the appendices to this catalogue) summarizes the eleven principal sources of his chamber cantatas, which are 1 Inventoried in Margaret Murata, “Pasqualini riconosciuto,” in "Et facciam dolçi canti." Studi in onore di Agostino Ziino in occasione del suo 65° compleanno, ed.
    [Show full text]