DOCSLIB.ORG

Statute Law Revision; Fourth Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statute Law Revision; Fourth Report The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 49) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 26) STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor, the Secretary of State for Scotland and the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty September 1912 LONDON HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERYOFFICE 42p net Cmnd. 5108 The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commis- sions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law other than the law of Scotland or of any law of Northern Ireland which the Parliament of Northern Iretand has power to amend. The Com- missioners are- The Honourable Mr Justice Scarman, O.B.E., Chairman. Mr. Claud Bicknell, O.B.E. Mr. Aubrey L. Diamond. Mr. Derek Hodgson, Q.C. Mr. N. S-Marsh, Q.C. The Secretary of the Commission is Mr. J. M. Cartwright Sharp and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobald's Road, London, WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commission was set up by section 2 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law of Scotland. The Commissioners are- The Honourable Lord Hunter, Chairman. I Professor A. E. Anton. I Professor J. M. Halliday, C.B.E. Professor T. B. Smith, Q.C. I Mr. Ewan Stewart, M.C., Q.C. I The Secretary of the Commission is Mr. J. B. Man and its offices are at the Old College, University of Edinburgh, South Bridge, Edin- burgh, EH8 9BD. THE LAW COMMISSION and THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTH REPORT Draft Statute Law (Repeals)Billprepared under section 3(1)(d) ofthe Law CommissionsAct 1965. To the Right Hornarable the Lord Hailsham of Saint Marylebone, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, the Right Honourable Gordon Campbell, M.C., M.P., Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Scotland, and the Right Honourable Norman Wylie, V.R.D., Q.C., M.P., Her Majesty’s Advocate. We have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1 to this Report and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it. An explanatory note on the contents of the draft Bill accompanies this Report as Appendix 2. This draft Bill has been prepared in continuation of our new approach to statute law revision, namely, to work systematically through thc existing statutes with a view to recommending the repeal, not only of matter that can be treated as inoperative, but also of matter that no longer serves a substantial purpose. The amendments specified in Schedule 2 to the draft Bill are designed to preserve certain effects of enactments otherwise ready for repeal. The repeals proposed in the draft Bill have been widely can- vassed with the Government departments and other bodies concerned with them and the repeals which extend to Northern Ireland have been agreed to by the authorities in Northern Ireland. The basic aim of the draft Bill is to improve the statute book of the United Kingdom, but a number of the enactmentsproposed for repeal have, by virtue of their own terms, a wider application to territories outside the United Kingdom. It is desirable that it should be clear that the repeals have no direct effect on the law of these territories but that, in the case of certain territories not having the legislative competence to make the repeals for them- selves, machinery should be provided to enable the repeals to be extended to them if, after consultation, it is thought right that this should be done. Accordingly, with the agreement of the Home Office and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, clause 2(2) of the draft Bill makes it clear that the Bill does not repeal any 1 enactment so far as the enactment forms part of the lawof a country outside the United Kingdom,but enables Her Majesty by Order in Council to provide that the repeal by the Bill of any enactment specified in the Order shall extend to any of the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man or any colony for whose external relations the United Kingdom is responsible. Signed LESLIESCARMAN,Chairman Law Commission. -- CLAUDBICKNELL. AUBREYL. DIAMOND. DEREKHODGSON. NORMANS. MARSH. J. M. CARTWRIGHTSHARP,Secretary. J. 0.M. HUNTER,Clzairmaii Scottish Law Commission. ALEXANDERE. ANTON. JOHN M. HALLIDAY. T. E. SMITH. EWANSTEWART. J. E. ALLAN,Secretary. 2 August 1972. 2 APPENDIX 1 Statute Law (Repeals) Bill -- DRAFT OF A BILL TO ROVIDE for the reform of the statute law by the AD. 1972 repeal, in accordance with recommendations of the PLaw Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, of certain enactments which, except so far as their effect is preserved, are no longer of practical utility. BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:- 1.-(1) The enactments inentioned in Schedule 1 to this Act Repeals, and are, subject in the case of the enactments mentioned in associated Parts 11, VI and XI of that Schedule to the savings specsed at the amendments* end of those Parts, hereby repealed to the extent specified in column 3 of that Schedule. 10 (2) The enactments mentioned in Schedule 2 to this Act shall have effect with the amendments specified in that Schedule (which preserve certain effects of enactments repealed by the preceding subsection). 15 241) It is hereby declared that, except as provided by Provisions paragraph 2(2) of Schedule 2 to this Act, this Act extends to ~~~~~~ Northeim Ireland; but nothing in this Act shall be taken to restrict the power of the Parliament of Northern Ireland to make and certain laws, and any laws made by that Parliament in the exercise of overseas that power shall have effect notwithstanding anything in this Act. territories. 3 Statute Law (Repeals) Bill (2) It is hereby declared that this Act does not repeal any enactment so far as the enactment forms part of the law of a country outside the United Kingdom; but Her Majesty may by Order in Council provide that the repeal by this Act of any enactment specified in the Order shall on a date so specified 5 extend to any oFThe Channel Islands or the Isle of Man or any colony for whose external relations the United Kingdom is responsible. Short title. 3. This Act may be cited as the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1972. 4 Statute Law (Repeals) Bill SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 1 Section l(1). ENACTMENTSREPEALED PART 1 5 ENACTMENTSRELATING TO THE DEMISE OF THE CROWN Chapter Short title Extent of repeal 6 Anne c. 41. The Succession to the Section 8. Crown Act 1707. 11 Geo. 4 & TheDemise of the Crown The whole Act except section 4. 10 1 Will. 4. Act 1830. In section 4, the words ‘‘ here- c. 43. tofore granted or ”. 1 Will. 4. c. 4. The Colonial Offices The whole Act. Act 1830. 7 Will. 4. & 1 TheDemise of the Crown The whole Act. Vict. c. 31. Act 1837. l5 37 & 38 Vict. The Great Seal (Offices) In section 8, the words from c. 81. Act 1874. “and shall continue” to . “ successors ”. 39 & 40 Vict. The Appellate Jurisdic- In section 6, the words from 20 c. 59. tion Act 1876. “and shall continue” to “ Crown ”. 50 & 51 Vict. The Sheriffs Act 1887. In section 3(3), the words “ of c. 55. the Crown, or in Cornwall ”. 1 Edw. 7. c. 5. TheDemise of the Crown Section l(2). 25 Act 1901. Act of Parliament of Ireland 21 &22 Geo.3. Yelverton’s Act (Ireland) In section 3, the words ‘‘ of any c. 48 (Ir.). 1781. I office, civil or military or 9’. PART 11 30 ECCLESIASTICALENACTMENTS RELATING TO BISHOPRICS Chapter I Short title I Extent of repeal 10 & 11 Vict. The Ecclesiastical Com- The whole Act. c. 108. missioners Act 1847. 38 & 39 Vict. The Bishopric of St. The whole Act. 35 c. 34. Albans Act 1875. 39 & 40 Vict. The Bishopric of Tmo The whole Act. c. 54. Act 1876. 41 & 42 Vict. The Bishoprics Act 1878. Thewhole Act except sections 1 c. 68. and 5. 40 47 & 48 Vict. The Bishopric of Bristol Section 2. c. 66. Act 1884. In section 3, in paragraph (l), the words from “ and in the construction ” onwards, and paragraphs (3) and (5). 45 The Schedule. 57 & 58 Vict. The Bishopric of Bristol The whole Act. c. 21. Amendment Act 1894. 59 & 60 Vict. The Bishopric of Bristol The whole Act. c. 29. Amendment Act 1896. 5 Statute Law (Repeals)Bill SCH. 1 Chapter Short title Extent of repeal 4 Edw. 7. c. 30. The Bishoprics of South- The whole Act. wark and Birmingham Act 1904. 3 & 4 Geo. 5. The Bishoprics of The whole Act. 5 c. 36. Sheffield, Chelmsford, and for the County of Suffolk Act 1913. 7 & 8 Geo. 5. The Bishoprics of Brad- The whole Act. c. 57. ford and Coventry 10 Act 1918. Church Assembly Measures 14 & 15 Geo. 5. The Bishopric of Black- The whole Measure except No. 4. burn Measure 1923. sections 1 and 13. 14 & 15 Geo. 5. The Diocese of Southwell The whole Measure. 15 No. 5. (Division) Measure 1923 14 & 15 Geo. 5. The Diocese of Win- The whole Measure. No. 6. chester (Division) Measure 1923. 15 & 16Geo. 5. TheBishopricof Leicester The whole Measure. 20 No. 2. Measure 1925. 25 &26 Geo. 5. The Diocese of Southwell The whole Measure.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issues Paper on Consolidation of Evidence Legislation
    Issues Paper Number 3 Consolidation of evidence legislation (LRC IP 3-2013) This is the third Issues Paper published by the Law Reform Commission. The purpose of an Issues Paper is to provide a summary or outline of a project on which the Commission is embarking or on which work is already underway, and to provide readers with an opportunity to express views and to make suggestions and comments on specific questions. The Issues Papers are circulated to members of the legal professions and to other professionals and groups who are likely to have a particular interest in, or specialist knowledge of, the relevant topic. They are also published on the Commission’s website (www.lawreform.ie) to ensure they are available to all members of the public. These Issues Papers represent current thinking within the Commission on the various items mentioned. They should not be taken as representing settled positions that have been taken by the Commission. Comments and suggestions are warmly welcomed from all interested parties and all responses will be treated in the strictest confidence. These should be sent to the Law Reform Commission: via email to [email protected] with the subject line Evidence or via post to IPC House, 35-39 Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, marked for the attention of Evidence Researcher We would like to receive replies no later than close of business on 13th September 2013 if possible. ACTS CONSIDERED IN THIS ISSUE PAPER 1. WITNESSES ACT 1806 (REPEAL WITH RE-ENACTMENT PROPOSED) 2. EVIDENCE ACT 1843 (REPEAL WITH PARTIAL RE-ENACTMENT PROPOSED) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF the Whole
    Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Game Act 1831. (See end of Document for details) Game Act 1831 1831 CHAPTER 32 1 and 2 Will 4 An Act to amend the Laws in England relative to Game. F1 F2 [5th October 1831] Editorial Information X1 This Act is not necessarily in the form in which it has effect in Northern Ireland Textual Amendments F1 Act repealed in part (S.) (29.6.2011) by Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011 (asp 6), s. 43(1), Sch. Pt. 2 (with s. 41(1)); S.S.I. 2011/279, art. 2(1)(l)(ii) (as amended by S.S.I. 2011/287, art. 2) F2 Act repealed (N.I.) (17.8.2011) by Wildlife and Natural Environment Act (Northern Ireland) 2011 (c. 15), s. 40(1), Sch. 3 Pt. 2; S.R. 2011/285, art. 2, Sch. Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Short title “The Game Act 1831” given by Short Titles Act 1896 (c. 14) C2 Act amended with the substitution for references to the term “game certificate” of references to a licence to kill game by Game Licences Act 1860 (c. 90), s. 6; amended (S.) by Game Laws Amendment (Scotland) Act 1877 (c. 28 SIF 4:3),s. 10 ; extended as to certain provisions by Game Licences Act 1860 (c. 90), s. 13 C3 Preamble repealed by Statute Law Revision (No. 2) Act 1888 (c. 57) C4 Certain words of enactment repealed by Statute Law Revision (No. 2) Act 1888 (c. 57) and remainder omitted under authority of Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Histories of Value Following Deer Populations Through the English Landscape from 1800 to the Present Day
    Holly Marriott Webb Histories of Value Following Deer Populations Through the English Landscape from 1800 to the Present Day Master’s thesis in Global Environmental History 1 Abstract Marriott Webb, H. 2019. Histories of Value: Following Deer Populations Through the English Landscape from 1800 to the Present Day. Uppsala, Department of Archaeology and Ancient His- tory. Imagining the English landscape as an assemblage entangling deer and people throughout history, this thesis explores how changes in deer population connect to the ways deer have been valued from 1800 to the present day. Its methods are mixed, its sources are conversations – human voices in the ongoing historical negotiations of the multispecies body politic, the moot of people, animals, plants and things which shapes and orders the landscape assemblage. These conversations include interviews with people whose lives revolve around deer, correspondence with the organisations that hold sway over deer lives, analysis of modern media discourse around deer issues and exchanges with the history books. It finds that a non-linear increase in deer population over the time period has been accompanied by multiple changes in the way deer are valued as part of the English landscape. Ending with a reflection on how this history of value fits in to wider debates about the proper representation of animals, the nature of non-human agency, and trajectories of the Anthropocene, this thesis seeks to open up new ways of exploring questions about human- animal relationships in environmental history. Keywords: Assemblages, Deer, Deer population, England, Hunting, Landscape, Making killable, Moots, Multispecies, Nativist paradigm, Olwig, Pests, Place, Trash Animals, Tsing, United Kingdom, Wildlife management.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Crown May Do
    WHAT THE CROWN MAY DO 1. It is now established, at least at the level of the Court of Appeal (so that Court has recently stated)1, that, absent some prohibition, a Government minister may do anything which any individual may do. The purpose of this paper is to explain why this rule is misconceived and why it, and the conception of the “prerogative” which it necessarily assumes, should be rejected as a matter of constitutional law. 2. The suggested rule raises two substantive issues of constitutional law: (i) who ought to decide in what new activities the executive may engage, in what circumstances and under what conditions; and (ii) what is the scope for abuse that such a rule may create and should it be left without legal control. 3. As Sir William Wade once pointed out (in a passage subsequently approved by the Appellate Committee2), “The powers of public authorities are...essentially different from those of private persons. A man making his will may, subject to any rights of his dependants, dispose of his property just as he may wish. He may act out of malice or a spirit of revenge, but in law this does not affect his exercise of power. In the same way a private person has an absolute power to release a debtor, or, where the law permits, to evict a tenant, regardless of his motives. This is unfettered discretion.” If a minister may do anything that an individual may do, he may pursue any purpose which an individual may do when engaged in such activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute of Commonwealth Studies
    University of London INSTITUTE OF COMMONWEALTH STUDIES VOICE FILE NAME: The Hon. Michael Kirby SO: Sue Onslow (Interviewer) MK: Michael Kirby (Respondent) SO: This is Sue Onslow talking to the Honourable Michael Kirby in Sydney on Friday, 28th March, 2014. Mr Kirby, thank you very much indeed for agreeing to take part in this oral history project. I wonder if you could begin by reflecting, Sir, on the establishment of the Eminent Persons’ Group of 2009-2010? Obviously, this came out of the Port of Spain affirmation in 2009, but I wondered if you could lay some background of how you came to be appointed to that group? MK: I’m not sure how the appointment came about. Sometimes it’s better not to know how appointments to national or international bodies occur. However, I was approached, first, I think, by a representative of the Australian government to ask if I would serve; then I received a letter from the Secretary- General, Mr Sharma, and he invited me to serve. I then accepted, and I served. But I’m not aware of the steps that were taken to secure my appointment. They may have arisen out of the fact that I had taken quite an active part over the years in the work of the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Division of the Commonwealth. I had contributed repeatedly to the Commonwealth Law Bulletin. I had gone repeatedly to Commonwealth Law conferences, and presented papers at them. I had not been a member of the political activities of the Commonwealth, but of basically the legal and support systems of the Commonwealth, which is often where it does its best work.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Law: Conspiracy to Defraud
    CRIMINAL LAW: CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD LAW COMMISSION LAW COM No 228 The Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 228) CRIMINAL LAW: CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD Item 5 of the Fourth Programme of Law Reform: Criminal Law Laid before Parliament bj the Lord High Chancellor pursuant to sc :tion 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 6 December 1994 LONDON: 11 HMSO E10.85 net The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Brooke, Chairman Professor Andrew Burrows Miss Diana Faber Mr Charles Harpum Mr Stephen Silber QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London, WClN 2BQ. 11 LAW COMMISSION CRIMINAL LAW: CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD CONTENTS Paragraph Page PART I: INTRODUCTION 1.1 1 A. Background to the report 1. Our work on conspiracy generally 1.2 1 2. Restrictions on charging conspiracy to defraud following the Criminal Law Act 1977 1.8 3 3. The Roskill Report 1.10 4 4. The statutory reversal of Ayres 1.11 4 5. Law Commission Working Paper No 104 1.12 5 6. Developments in the law after publication of Working Paper No 104 1.13 6 7. Our subsequent work on the project 1.14 6 B. A general review of dishonesty offences 1.16 7 C. Summary of our conclusions 1.20 9 D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latitudinarian Influence on Early English Liberalism Amanda Oh Southern Methodist University, [email protected]
    Southern Methodist University SMU Scholar The Larrie and Bobbi Weil Undergraduate Research Central University Libraries Award Documents 2019 The Latitudinarian Influence on Early English Liberalism Amanda Oh Southern Methodist University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/weil_ura Part of the European History Commons, History of Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Oh, Amanda, "The Latitudinarian Influence on Early English Liberalism" (2019). The Larrie and Bobbi Weil Undergraduate Research Award Documents. 10. https://scholar.smu.edu/weil_ura/10 This document is brought to you for free and open access by the Central University Libraries at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Larrie and Bobbi Weil Undergraduate Research Award Documents by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. The Latitudinarian Influence on Early English Liberalism Amanda Oh Professor Wellman HIST 4300: Junior Seminar 30 April 2018 Part I: Introduction The end of the seventeenth century in England saw the flowering of liberal ideals that turned on new beliefs about the individual, government, and religion. At that time the relationship between these cornerstones of society fundamentally shifted. The result was the preeminence of the individual over government and religion, whereas most of Western history since antiquity had seen the manipulation of the individual by the latter two institutions. Liberalism built on the idea that both religion and government were tied to the individual. Respect for the individual entailed respect for religious diversity and governing authority came from the assent of the individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Statute Law Revision Bill 2007 ————————
    ———————— AN BILLE UM ATHCHO´ IRIU´ AN DLI´ REACHTU´ IL 2007 STATUTE LAW REVISION BILL 2007 ———————— Mar a tionscnaı´odh As initiated ———————— ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Definitions. 2. General statute law revision repeal and saver. 3. Specific repeals. 4. Assignment of short titles. 5. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1896. 6. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1962. 7. Miscellaneous amendments to post-1800 short titles. 8. Evidence of certain early statutes, etc. 9. Savings. 10. Short title and collective citation. SCHEDULE 1 Statutes retained PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 [No. 5 of 2007] SCHEDULE 2 Statutes Specifically Repealed PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 ———————— 2 Acts Referred to Bill of Rights 1688 1 Will. & Mary, Sess. 2. c. 2 Documentary Evidence Act 1868 31 & 32 Vict., c. 37 Documentary Evidence Act 1882 45 & 46 Vict., c. 9 Dower Act, 1297 25 Edw. 1, Magna Carta, c. 7 Drainage and Improvement of Lands Supplemental Act (Ireland) (No. 2) 1867 31 & 32 Vict., c. 3 Dublin Hospitals Regulation Act 1856 19 & 20 Vict., c. 110 Evidence Act 1845 8 & 9 Vict., c. 113 Forfeiture Act 1639 15 Chas., 1. c. 3 General Pier and Harbour Act 1861 Amendment Act 1862 25 & 26 Vict., c.
    [Show full text]
  • Difficulties with Drug Conspiracies in Singapore: Can You Conspire to Traffic Drugs to Yourself?
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title Difficulties With Drug Conspiracies in Singapore: Can You Conspire to Traffic Drugs to Yourself? Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/30x226bn Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 37(1) Author Yang, Kenny Publication Date 2020 DOI 10.5070/P8371048805 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California DIFFICULTIES WITH DRUG CONSPIRACIES IN SINGAPORE: Can You Conspire to Traffic Drugs to Yourself? Kenny Yang Abstract If Person A delivers drugs to Person B at the latter’s request, Person A is liable for drug trafficking—a serious offense in many jurisdictions. However, the liability of Person B for drug trafficking is unclear as much may depend on Person B’s intention with the drugs. The Singaporean Courts recently had to grapple with this issue in Liew Zheng Yang v. Public Prosecutor and Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan v. Public Prosecu- tor and other appeals. Prior to these two cases, the position in Singapore was clear—Person B should be liable for drug trafficking as an accessory to Person A, in line with Singapore’s strong stance against drug offenses. However, since these cases, the Singaporean Courts have taken a con- trary position and held that Person B may not be liable if the drugs were for his/her own consumption. This Article examines the law with respect to this drug conspiracy offense in Singapore, looking at its history, the primary legislation and similar cases. It also scrutinizes the judicial reasoning in the two cases above and considers whether this can be reconciled with the Courts’ prior position on the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanatory Notes
    BANK OF ENGLAND AND FINANCIAL SERVICES BILL [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [HL] as brought from the House of Lords on 19 January 2016 (Bill 120). • These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Treasury in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. • These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. • These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. So where a provision of the Bill does not seem to require any explanation or comment, the Notes simply say in relation to it that the provision is self‐explanatory. Bill 120–EN 56/1 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 3 Policy background 4 Legal background 6 Territorial extent and application 7 Commentary on provisions of Bill 9 Part 1: The Bank of England 9 Clause 1: Membership of court of directors 9 Clause 2: Term of office of non‐executive directors 9 Clause 3: Abolition of Oversight Committee 9 Clause 4: Functions of non‐executive directors 9 Clause 5: Financial stability strategy 9 Clause 6: Financial Policy Committee: status and membership 10 Clause 7: Monetary Policy Committee:
    [Show full text]
  • Deregulation Act 2015
    Deregulation Act 2015 CHAPTER 20 DEREGULATION ACT 2015 DEREGULATION Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail TSO / sig1 plateA PO Box 29, Norwich, NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Houses of Parliament Shop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square London SW1A 2JX £29.75 Telephone orders/General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.shop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents 49024_Chapter 20 2015_Cover 49024_Finance Act 2015 chap 20_Cover.indd 1 27/03/2015 15:00 Deregulation Act 2015 CHAPTER 20 CONTENTS Measures affecting the workplace: general 1 Health and safety at work: general duty of self-employed persons 2 Removal of employment tribunals’ power to make wider recommendations 3 Apprenticeships: simplification 4 English apprenticeships: funding arrangements 5 English apprenticeships: disclosure of information 6 Requirements to wear safety helmets: exemption for Sikhs 7 Requirements to wear safety helmets: exemption for Sikhs: Northern Ireland Measures affecting business: particular areas 8Driving instructors 9 Motor insurers 10 Taxis and private hire vehicles: duration of licences 11 Private hire vehicles: sub-contracting 12 Space activity: limit on indemnity required 13 Agricultural Holdings Act 1986: resolution of disputes by third party determination 14 Shippers etc of gas 15 Suppliers of fuel and fireplaces 16 Sellers of knitting yarn Companies and insolvency 17 Authorisation of insolvency practitioners 18 Auditors ceasing to hold office 19 Insolvency and company law: miscellaneous Use of land 20 Recorded rights of way: additional protection 21 Unrecorded rights of way: protection from extinguishment 22 Conversion of public rights of way to private rights of way ii Deregulation Act 2015 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Law Act 1977
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Criminal Law Act 1977. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Criminal Law Act 1977 1977 CHAPTER 45 An Act to amend the law of England and Wales with respect to criminal conspiracy; to make new provision in that law, in place of the provisions of the common law and the Statutes of Forcible Entry, for restricting the use or threat of violence for securing entry into any premises and for penalising unauthorised entry or remaining on premises in certain circumstances; otherwise to amend the criminal law, including the law with respect to the administration of criminal justice; to provide for the alteration of certain pecuniary and other limits; to amend section 9(4) of the Administration of Justice Act 1973, the Legal Aid Act 1974, the Rabies Act 1974 and the Diseases of Animals (Northern Ireland) Order 1975 and the law about juries and coroners’ inquests; and for connected purposes. [29th July 1977] Annotations: Editorial Information X1 The text of ss. 1–5, 14–49, 57, 58, 60–65, Schs. 1–9, 11–14 was taken from S.I.F. Group 39:1 (Criminal Law: General), ss. 51, 63(2), 65(1)(3)(7)(10) from S.I.F. Group 39:2 ( Criminal Law: Public Safety and Order), ss. 53, 54, 65(1)(3)(7)(9)(10) Group 39:5 (Criminal Law: Sexual Offences and Obscenity), ss.
    [Show full text]