DOCSLIB.ORG

Meadow Jumping Mice (Zapus Hudsonius Preblei) on the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meadow Jumping Mice (Zapus Hudsonius Preblei) on the U.S Meadow Jumping Mice (Zapus hudsonius preblei) on the U.S. Air Force Academy, El Paso County, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program February 2001 College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Meadow Jumping Mice (Zapus hudsonius preblei) on the U.S. Air Force Academy El Paso County, Colorado Robert A. Schorr Zoologist Cover photographs: 1. Subadult meadow jumping mouse from Monument Creek 2. Monument Creek near southeast of Reservoir No. 1 Suggested citation: Schorr, R. A. 2001. Meadow jumping mice (Zapus hudsonius preblei) on the U.S. Air Force Academy, El Paso County, Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program unpublished report to the Natural Resources Branch, U.S. Air Force Academy. 53 pp. Additional reports available at www.cnhp.colostate.edu 2 Acknowledgments This study would not have been conducted without the financial support of the U.S. Air Force Academy and the Department of Defense. In addition, Colorado State University, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and The Nature Conservancy aided in administrative support. Dana Green, former Natural Resource Planner for the U.S. Air Force Academy, is responsible for much of the support for this long-term study. Thank you to the field technicians throughout the years who were instrumental in the information collection and for their biological insight: Mitch Emig, Joanne Stewart, Laurie Masten, Parker Schuerman, Gordon Mullen, Jose Maldonado, Susan Ask, and Tanya Derrickson. Volunteers played an instrumental role in data collection and analysis. I want to thank them for their commitment to and energy for the project. Thank you to Kathy Ruffert, Michael Winfree, Paul Brotherton, Chiara Buckman, and Jamie Jones. Thank you to those who contributed advice and assistance: Mike Wunder, Jeremy Siemers, Mary Klein, Gary White, David Anderson, and Ken Wilson. Much appreciation to the Preble’s meadow jumping mouse Research Team of Mark Bakeman, Carron Meaney, Tom Ryon, and Tanya Shenk for their collaboration and brainstorming. A final thank you to all the reviewers who took the time to make comments and suggestions. Thank you to Jim Gionfriddo, Tom Ryon, Mark Bakeman, John Armstrong, Chris Pague, Renne Rondeau, Jeremy Siemers, and Mike Wunder. Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..........................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................6 DISTRIBUTION AND STATUS OF ZAPUS HUDSONIUS PREBLEI ................................................................................6 ECOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY OF ZAPUS HUDSONIUS PREBLEI ...................................................................7 SYSTEMATICS AND CLASSIFICATION OF ZAPUS ....................................................................................................8 THE U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY.......................................................................................................................... 10 HISTORY OF MEADOW JUMPING MICE ON THE ACADEMY .............................................................................. 11 I. Academy Jumping Mouse Inventories: 1994 and 1995................................................................................ 11 II. Academy Jumping Mouse Inventories: 1997-1999..................................................................................... 11 MEADOW JUMPING MOUSE RESEARCH ON THE U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY............................ 12 HOME RANGE AND MOVEMENT OF Z. H. PREBLEI ............................................................................................. 12 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Methods............................................................................................................................................................... 12 Results ................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Discussion........................................................................................................................................................... 14 MEADOW JUMPING MOUSE POPULATIONS ON THE U. S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY............................................ 17 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Methods............................................................................................................................................................... 17 Results ................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Discussion........................................................................................................................................................... 19 MEADOW JUMPING MOUSE HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION AND CORRELATIONS.............. 22 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 22 Methods............................................................................................................................................................... 22 Results ................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Discussion........................................................................................................................................................... 23 COMPARISON OF POSITIVE TRAPPING LOCATIONS BETWEEN THE ACADEMY AND RFETS (MICROSITE COMPARISONS) .......................................................................................................................... 25 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 25 Methods............................................................................................................................................................... 25 Results ................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Discussion........................................................................................................................................................... 26 NOTES ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF ZAPUS HUDSONIUS PREBLEI........................................... 28 Hibernacula ........................................................................................................................................................ 28 Day nests............................................................................................................................................................. 28 Parasites.............................................................................................................................................................. 28 Associated Mammal Species.............................................................................................................................. 29 Predators and mortality factors......................................................................................................................... 29 RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................................................................................................... 30 LITERATURE CITED............................................................................................................................................ 32 FIGURES AND TABLES........................................................................................................................................ 40 FIGURE 1. DISTRIBUTION OF ZAPUS HUDSONIUS FROM E. RAYMOND HALL. 1981. MAMMALS OF NORTH AMERICA. JOHN WILEY AND SONS PUBLI SHING. NEW YORK. 1187 PP............................................ 40 FIGURE 2. DISTRIBUTION OF ZAPUS HUDSONIUS IN THE SOUTHWESTERN PART OF ITS RANGE. TAKEN FROM D. J. HAFNER, K. E. PETERSEN , AND T. L. YATES . 1981. EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIP OF JUMPING 4 MICE (GENUS ZAPUS) OF THE SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES. JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 62:501- 512......................................................................................................................................................... 41 FIGURE 3. DISTRIBUTION OF ZAPUS HUDSONIUS PREBLEI IN COLORADO. TAKEN FROM ARMSTRONG, D. M. 1972. DISTRIBUTION OF MAMMALS IN COLORADO. MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS, LAWRENCE, KS. 415 PP........................................................................................................ 42 FIGURE 4. DISTRIBUTION OF ZAPUS HUDSONIUS PREBLEI IN COLORADO .............................................................. 43 TABLE 1. TRAPPING EFFORT ON THE U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY (1997-1999)................................................... 45 TABLE 2. ZAPUS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural History
    NATURAL HISTORY By Kate Warren and Ian MacQuarrie nimals have a variety of gaits, with woods. They are very similar in size and very sensibly, in hibernation. A the pattern employed depending colour: brown backs, yellow sides shad- Aside from the tail tips, what are the upon habitat and circumstance. More- ing to white underneath. The easiest way main differences between the two spe- over, since much knowledge of the life to tell them from the runners is by their cies? Evolution theory suggests that and times of a species comes from inter- tails, which are longer than their bodies. there must be some dissimilarities, or preting tracks, some attention to the It is safe to assume that any mouse with else one would compete strongly against, dancing feet that make them is useful such a long tail is a jumping mouse. and perhaps eliminate, the other. There and often necessary. Basic biology, then, And how do you tell the jumping mice are, of course, differences in preferred is not just counting teeth; it is looking at apart? Again, the tail distinguishes them: habitat between woodland and meadow toes, and how these are picked up and the woodland jumping mouse has a white- jumpers, but they also differ in social put down. tipped tail, the meadow jumping mouse customs, behaviour. Both species are For instance, there are six species of does not. Such minor differences may b e somewhat nomadic, but the grassland small rodents on Prince Edward Island lost on your cat, but they are mighty jumper is usually found alone, while the that can generally be called "mice." handy for naturalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandible Variation in the Dwarf Fat-Tailed Jerboa, Pygeretmus Pumilio (Rodentia: Dipodidae)
    Canadian Journal of Zoology Phenotypic plasticity under desert environment constraints: mandible variation in the dwarf fat-tailed jerboa, Pygeretmus pumilio (Rodentia: Dipodidae) Journal: Canadian Journal of Zoology Manuscript ID cjz-2019-0029.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 17-Apr-2019 Author: Complete List of Authors: Krystufek, Boris; Slovenian Museum of Natural History Janzekovic, Franc; Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor Shenbrot, DraftGeorgy; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology Ivajnsic, Danijel; Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor Klenovsek, Tina; Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor Is your manuscript invited for consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue?: Bergmann’s rule, desert ecology, ecomorphology, geometric Keyword: morphometrics, dwarf fat-tailed jerboa, Pygeretmus pumilio, resource availability https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Page 1 of 46 Canadian Journal of Zoology Phenotypic plasticity under desert environment constraints: mandible variation in the dwarf fat-tailed jerboa, Pygeretmus pumilio (Rodentia: Dipodidae) B. Kryštufek, F. Janžekovič, G. Shenbrot, D. Ivajnšič, and T. Klenovšek B. Kryštufek. Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, email: [email protected] F. Janžekovič, D. Ivajnšič, and T. Klenovšek. Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Koroška 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia, emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] G. Shenbrot. Mitrani Department ofDraft Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel, email: [email protected] Correspondence: T. Klenovšek Address: Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Koroška 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovery of Armenian Birch Mouse, Sicista Armenica (Mammalia, Rodentia, Sminthidae)
    Vestnik zoologii, 51(5): 443–446, 2017 DOI 10.1515/vzoo-2017-0054 UDC UDC 599.323.3(479.25) REDISCOVERY OF ARMENIAN BIRCH MOUSE, SICISTA ARMENICA (MAMMALIA, RODENTIA, SMINTHIDAE) M. Rusin1*, A. Ghazaryan2, T. Hayrapetyan2, G. Papov2, A. Martynov3 1 Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology NAS of Ukraine, B. Khmelnitskogo, 15, Kyiv, 01030 Ukraine 2Yerevan State University, A. Manoogian 1, Yerevan 0025, Armenia 3Zoological Museum, National Museum of Natural History, B. Khmelnitskogo, 15, Kyiv, 01030 Ukraine *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Rediscovery of Armenian Birch Mouse, Sicista armenica (Mammalia, Rodentia, Sminthidae). Rusin, M., Ghazaryan, A., Hayrapetyan, T., Papov, G., Martynov, A. — Armenian birch mouse is one of the least known species of mammals of Eurasia. It was described as a separate species based on three specimen trapped in 1986. From that time no other Sicista was found in Armenia. In 2015 we surveyed Central and Northern Armenia and established that probably population from the type locality is lost. But we found another population on Sevan Pass. Due to our observations the species meets Critically Endangered B2a+bIV category of the IUCN Red List. Key words: Sicista, Caucasus, Armenia, subalpine meadows, extinction, Critically Endangered. Introduction Armenian birch mouse, Sicista armenica Sokolov and Baskevich, 1988, is one of the sibling species in the S. caucasica group, which are S. caucasica s. str., S. kluchorica, S. kazbegica and S. armenica. All of these species were described based on diff erent chromosomal numbers in 1980th: S. caucasica 2n = 32, nF = 48; S. kluchorica 2n = 24, nF = 44; S. kazbegica 2n = 40–42, nF = 50–52; S.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Year Review Short Form Summary
    5-Year Review Short Form Summary Species Reviewed: Preble’s meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) FR Notice Announcing Initiation of This Review: March 31, 2004. 90-Day Finding for a Petition to Delist the Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse in Colorado and Wyoming and Initiation of a 5-Year Review (69 FR 16944-16946). Lead Region/Field Office: Region 6, Seth Willey, Recovery Coordinator, 303-236-4257. Colorado Field Office, Susan Linner, Field Supervisor, 303-236-4773. Name of Reviewer: Peter Plage, Colorado Field Office, 303-236-4750. Cooperating Field Office: Wyoming Field Office, Brian Kelly, Field Supervisor, 307-772-2374. Current Classification: Threatened rangewide. Current Recovery Priority Number: 9c. This recovery priority number is indicative of a subspecies facing a moderate degree of threat, a high recovery potential, and whose recovery may be in conflict with construction or other development projects or other forms of economic activity. Methodology used to complete the review: The 5-year review for the Preble’s meadow jumping mouse (Preble’s) was accomplished through the petition and rulemaking process. On December 23, 2003, we received two nearly identical petitions from the State of Wyoming’s Office of the Governor and from Coloradans for Water Conservation and Development, seeking to remove the Preble’s from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. Both petitions were similar and maintained that the Preble’s should be delisted based on the taxonomic revision, and based on new distribution, abundance, and trends data that suggested the Preble’s was no longer threatened. On March 31, 2004, we published a notice announcing a 90-day finding that the petitions presented substantial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted and initiated a 5-year review (69 FR 16944-16946).
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the SECRETARY of the INTERIOR Petition to List the Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse (Zapus Hudsonius Preblei) As a Distinc
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR Petition to List the Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) as a Distinct Population Segment under the Endangered Species Act November 9, 2017 Petitioners: Center for Biological Diversity Rocky Mountain Wild Acknowledgment: Conservation Intern Shane O’Neal substantially contributed to drafting of this petition. November 9, 2017 Mr. Ryan Zinke CC: Ms. Noreen Walsh Secretary of the Interior Mountain-Prairie Regional Director Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 18th and C Street, N.W. 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 650 Washington, D.C. 20240 Lakewood, CO 80228 [email protected] Dear Mr. Zinke, Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), and 50 C.F.R. §424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity and Rocky Mountain Wild hereby formally petitions the Secretary of the Interior, through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”, “the Service”) to list the Preble’s meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) as a distinct population segment. Although the Preble’s meadow jumping mouse is already currently listed as a subspecies, this petition is necessary because of a petition seeking to de-list the Preble’s meadow jumping mouse (“jumping mouse”, “Preble’s”), filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation on behalf of their clients (PLF 2017), arguing that the jumping mouse no longer qualifies as a subspecies. Should FWS find this petition warrants further consideration (e.g. a positive 90-day finding), we are submitting this petition to ensure that the agency simultaneously considers listing the Preble’s as a distinct population segment of the meadow jumping mouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report New Mexico Meadow Jumping Mouse (Zapus Hudsonius Luteus)
    Species Status Assessment Report New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus) (photo courtesy of J. Frey) Prepared by the Listing Review Team U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico May 27, 2014 New Mexico Meadow Jumping Mouse SSA May 27, 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment reports the results of the comprehensive status review for the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus) (jumping mouse) and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability and, conversely, extinction risk. The jumping mouse is a small mammal whose historical distribution likely included riparian areas and wetlands along streams in the Sangre de Cristo and San Juan Mountains from southern Colorado to central New Mexico, including the Jemez and Sacramento Mountains and the Rio Grande Valley from Española to Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge, and into parts of the White Mountains in eastern Arizona. In conducting our status assessment we first considered what the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse needs to ensure viability. We generally define viability as the ability of the species to persist over the long-term and, conversely, to avoid extinction. We next evaluated whether the identified needs of the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse are currently available and the repercussions to the subspecies when provision of those needs are missing or diminished. We then consider the factors that are causing the species to lack what it needs, including historical, current, and future factors. Finally, considering the information reviewed, we evaluate the current status and future viability of the species in terms of resiliency, redundancy, and representation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Roots of Human Lethal Violence José María Gómez1,2, Miguel Verdú3, Adela González-Megías4 & Marcos Méndez5
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature19758 The phylogenetic roots of human lethal violence José María Gómez1,2, Miguel Verdú3, Adela González-Megías4 & Marcos Méndez5 The psychological, sociological and evolutionary roots of 600 human populations, ranging from the Palaeolithic era to the present conspecific violence in humans are still debated, despite attracting (Supplementary Information section 9c). The level of lethal violence the attention of intellectuals for over two millennia1–11. Here we was defined as the probability of dying from intraspecific violence propose a conceptual approach towards understanding these roots compared to all other causes. More specifically, we calculated the level based on the assumption that aggression in mammals, including of lethal violence as the percentage, with respect to all documented humans, has a significant phylogenetic component. By compiling sources of mortality, of total deaths due to conspecifics (these sources of mortality from a comprehensive sample of mammals, were infanticide, cannibalism, inter-group aggression and any other we assessed the percentage of deaths due to conspecifics and, type of intraspecific killings in non-human mammals; war, homicide, using phylogenetic comparative tools, predicted this value for infanticide, execution, and any other kind of intentional conspecific humans. The proportion of human deaths phylogenetically killing in humans). predicted to be caused by interpersonal violence stood at 2%. Lethal violence is reported for almost 40% of the studied mammal This value was similar to the one phylogenetically inferred for species (Supplementary Information section 9a). This is probably the evolutionary ancestor of primates and apes, indicating that a an underestimation, because information is not available for many certain level of lethal violence arises owing to our position within species.
    [Show full text]
  • Zapus Hudsonius Luteus) Jennifer K
    Variation in phenology of hibernation and reproduction in the endangered New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus) Jennifer K. Frey Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America Frey Biological Research, Radium Springs, NM, United States of America ABSTRACT Hibernation is a key life history feature that can impact many other crucial aspects of a species’ biology, such as its survival and reproduction. I examined the timing of hibernation and reproduction in the federally endangered New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus), which occurs across a broad range of latitudes and elevations in the American Southwest. Data from museum specimens and field studies supported predictions for later emergence and shorter active intervals in montane populations relative to lower elevation valley populations. A low-elevation population located at Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge (BANWR) in the Rio Grande valley was most similar to other subspecies of Z. hudsonius: the first emergence date was in mid-May and there was an active interval of 162 days. In montane populations of Z. h. luteus, the date of first emergence was delayed until mid-June and the active interval was reduced to ca 124–135 days, similar to some populations of the western jumping mouse (Z. princeps). Last date of immergence into hibernation occurred at about the same time in all populations (mid to late October). In montane populations pregnant females are known from July to late August and evidence suggests that they have a single litter per year. At BANWR two peaks in reproduction were expected based Submitted 6 May 2015 on similarity of active season to Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Rodentia, Family Sciuridae—Squirrels
    What we’ve covered so far: Didelphimorphia Didelphidae – opossums (1 B.C. species) Soricomorpha Soricidae – shrews (9 B.C. species) Talpidae – moles (3 B.C. species) What’s next: Rodentia Sciuridae – squirrels (16) Muridae – mice, rats, lemmings, voles (16) Aplodontidae – mountain beaver (1) Castoridae – beaver (1) Dipodidae – jumping mice (2) Erethizontidae – N. American porcupines (1) Geomyidae – pocket gophers (1) Heteromyidae – kangaroo rats, pocket mice (1) Rodent diversity Order Rodentia • Dentition highly specialized for gnawing • Incisors: o single pair of upper, single pair of lower o grow continuously (rootless) o enamel on anterior surface, not posterior surface Order Rodentia • Dentition highly specialized for gnawing • Incisors • Diastema • No canines Family Sciuridae Family Sciuridae • Postorbital process well-developed • Rostrum short, arched • Infraorbital canal reduced relative to many other rodents • 1/1 0/0 1-2/1 3/3, anterior premolar sometimes small and peg-like Glaucomys sabrinus—northern flying squirrel • Can glide 5-25 meters • Strictly nocturnal • Share nests, reduce activity in winter because of cold Glaucomys sabrinus—northern flying squirrel • Conspicuous notch anterior to postorbital process • 5 upper cheekteeth Marmota spp. – marmots and woodchuck Marmota spp. – marmots and woodchuck • Rows of cheek teeth parallel, or nearly so • Postorbital processes protrude at 90° Marmota spp. – marmots and woodchuck • M. monax • M. caligata • M. vancouverensis • M. flaviventris Marmota monax - woodchuck • Posterior border
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Regulation
    Province of Alberta WILDLIFE ACT WILDLIFE REGULATION Alberta Regulation 143/1997 With amendments up to and including Alberta Regulation 148/2013 Office Consolidation © Published by Alberta Queen’s Printer Alberta Queen’s Printer 5th Floor, Park Plaza 10611 - 98 Avenue Edmonton, AB T5K 2P7 Phone: 780-427-4952 Fax: 780-452-0668 E-mail: [email protected] Shop on-line at www.qp.alberta.ca Copyright and Permission Statement Alberta Queen's Printer holds copyright on behalf of the Government of Alberta in right of Her Majesty the Queen for all Government of Alberta legislation. Alberta Queen's Printer permits any person to reproduce Alberta’s statutes and regulations without seeking permission and without charge, provided due diligence is exercised to ensure the accuracy of the materials produced, and Crown copyright is acknowledged in the following format: © Alberta Queen's Printer, 20__.* *The year of first publication of the legal materials is to be completed. Note All persons making use of this consolidation are reminded that it has no legislative sanction, that amendments have been embodied for convenience of reference only. The official Statutes and Regulations should be consulted for all purposes of interpreting and applying the law. (Consolidated up to 148/2013) ALBERTA REGULATION 143/97 Wildlife Act WILDLIFE REGULATION Table of Contents Interpretation and Application 1 Establishment of certain provisions by Lieutenant Governor in Council 2 Establishment of remainder by Minister 3 Interpretation 4 Interpretation for purposes of the Act 5 Exemptions and exclusions from Act and Regulation 6 Prevalence of Schedule 1 7 Application to endangered animals Part 1 Administration 8 Terms and conditions of approvals, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • (Allactaginae, Dipodidae, Rodentia): a Geometric Morphometric Study
    ZOOLOGICAL RESEARCH Cranial variation in allactagine jerboas (Allactaginae, Dipodidae, Rodentia): a geometric morphometric study Bader H. Alhajeri1,* 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Kuwait University, Safat 13060, Kuwait ABSTRACT rostra) from A. major+A. severtzovi+O. sibirica (with Allactaginae is a subfamily of dipodids consisting of converse patterns), while PC2 differentiated four- and five-toed jerboas (Allactaga, Allactodipus, Orientallactaga (with enlarged cranial bases and Orientallactaga, Pygeretmus, Scarturus) found in rostra along with reduced zygomatic arches and open habitats of Asia and North Africa. Recent foramina magna) from Scarturus+Pygeretmus (with molecular phylogenies have upended our the opposite patterns). Clustering based on the understanding of this group’s systematics across unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean taxonomic scales. Here, I used cranial geometric (UPGMA) contained the four genera, but S. hotsoni morphometrics to examine variation across 219 clustered with O. bullata+O. balikunica and O. specimens of 14 allactagine species (Allactaga sibirica clustered with A. major+A. severtzovi, likely major, A. severtzovi, Orientallactaga balikunica, O. due to convergence and allometry, respectively. bullata, O. sibirica, Pygeretmus platyurus, P. pumilio, Keywords: Allactaga; Cranial morphometrics; P. shitkovi, Scarturus aralychensis, S. euphraticus, Five-toed jerboas; Orientallactaga; Pygeretmus; S. hotsoni, S. indicus, S. tetradactylus, S. williamsi) Scarturus in light of their revised taxonomy. Results showed no significant sexual size or shape dimorphism. Species INTRODUCTION significantly differed in cranial size and shape both Allactaginae Vinogradov, 1925 is a subfamily of four- and five- overall and as species pairs. Species identity had a toed jerboas and is currently divided into five genera strong effect on both cranial size and shape.
    [Show full text]