DOCSLIB.ORG

TABLE of CONTENTS ABSTRACT I ACKNO WLEDGEMENTNS Iii TABLE of CONTENTS V LIST of FIGURES X LIST of TABLES Xiii 1. INTRODUCTION 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TABLE of CONTENTS ABSTRACT I ACKNO WLEDGEMENTNS Iii TABLE of CONTENTS V LIST of FIGURES X LIST of TABLES Xiii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT i ACKNO WLEDGEMENTNS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES x LIST OF TABLES xiii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. BACKGROUND 1 1.2. OBJECTIVES 2 1.3. METHODOLOGY 4 1.3.1. Earthquake Hazard 4 1.3.2. Building Inventory 5 1.3.3. Vulnerability Assessment 6 2. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN RISK ASSESSMENT 10 2.1. PROMPT ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL EARTHQUAKES FOR RESPONSE .... 10 2.1.1. Earthquake Source 10 2.1.2. Shaking Distribution 11 2.1.3. Loss Modeling 12 2.1.4. Loss Model Summary 15 2.1.5. Earthquake Alerting 15 2.1.6. Building Inventory 16 2.1.7. PAGER limitations 16 2.2. GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL [GEM) 17 2.2.1. GEM Ontology and Taxonomy 17 2.2.2. Global Earthquake Consequences Database 18 2.2.3. Global Exposure Database 18 2.2.4. Global Vulnerability Estimation Methods 18 2.3. SUMMARY 19 -v- http://d-nb.info/1024832333 Table of Contents 3. DATA LAYERS AND ANALYSIS 22 3.1. EARTHQUAKE HAZARD 22 3.1.1. Introduction 22 3.1.2. Past seismicity 23 3.1.3. The largest earthquakes 25 3.2. BUILDING INVENTORY IN PAKISTAN 28 3.2.1. Statistics 28 3.2.2. Age of the building stock 28 3.2.3. Typical building types 30 3.3. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS 30 3.3.1. Population density 33 3.3.2. Household size 33 3.4. SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS 34 3.4.1. Geology 35 3.4.2. Topography 35 3.4.3. Shear wave velocity 35 3.4.4. Soil types 35 3.5. DISCUSSION 36 4. BUILDING CODE AND SEISMIC ZONING MAPS 37 4.1. BUILDING CODE 37 4.1.1. Building code for Quetta municipality (1937) 37 4.1.2. Building code of Pakistan (1985) 39 4.1.3. Building code of Pakistan (2007) 40 4.2. SEISMIC ZONING MAPS 41 4.2.1. Development of seismic zoning maps 41 4.2.2. Comparison of seismic zoning maps 44 4.3. SUMMARY 46 5. EMPIRICAL VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 48 5.1. INTRODUCTION 48 5.2. VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES 48 5.2.1. Damage probability matrices 48 5.2.2. Vulnerability functions 49 5.3. EUROPEAN MACROSEISMIC SCALE -1998 (EMS-98) 49 5.3.1. Factors affecting vulnerability 50 5.4. FIELD SURVEYS IN PAKISTAN 52 5.4.1. Micro level 53 5.4.2. Macro level 56 -vi- Table of Contents 5.5. VULNERAB1LTY ASSESSMENT 57 5.5.1. Building type distribution 57 5.5.2. Vulnerability class distribution 60 5.5.3. Mean Vulnerability Index (MVI) 61 5.6. RECONSTRUCTION AFTER 2005 KASHMIR EARTHQUAKE 62 5.7. SUMMARY 69 6. VULNERABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES 71 6.1. INTRODUCTION 71 6.2. VULNERABILITY FUNCTIONS 72 6.2.1. Capacity of a building 72 6.2.2. Earthquake demand 72 6.3. ANALYSIS PROCEDURES 73 6.4. PUSH OVER ANALYSIS 74 6.5. STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY OF RC BUILDING IN PAKISTAN 75 6.6. CAPACITY CURVES FROM PUSHOVER ANALYSIS 78 6.7. SUMMARY 78 7. DAMAGE SCENARIOS 80 7.1. SELECTION OF SCENARIOS 80 7.2. METHODOLOGY 81 7.2.1. Identification of building typology 83 7.2.2. Assessment of Vulnerability Classes 83 7.2.3. Selection of scenario earthquakes 83 7.2.4. Damage estimation 83 7.3. OBSERVED DAMAGE IN 1935 QUETTA EARTHQUAKE 85 7.4. OBSERVED DAMAGE IN 2005 KASHMIR EARTHQUAKE 86 7.4.1. Damage to reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures 88 7.4.2. Damage to masonry structures 91 7.5. OBSERVED DAMAGE IN 2008 BALUCHISTAN EARTHQUAKE 93 7.6. DAMAGE ASSESSMENT FOR SELECTED SCENARIOS 98 7.6.1. Micro Level - Muzaffarabad 99 7.6.2. Meso Level - Northern Pakistan 100 7.6.3. Macro Level - South-Western and Northern Pakistan 104 7.7. DISCUSSION 108 -vii- Table of Contents 8. SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES-FATALITIES AND INJURIES Ill 8.1. INTRODUCTION Ill 8.2. STATE OF THE ART Ill 8.3. ESTIMATION METHODOLOGIES 115 8.4. FACTORS AFFECTING CASUALTY ESTIMATION 118 8.5. CASUALTY ESTIMATION FOR PAKISTAN 120 8.5.1. Coburn and Spence Casualty Model (CSCM) - 1992 121 8.5.2. Vulnerability-Based Casualty Model (VBCM) 123 8.6. DISCUSSION 132 9. LANDSLIDES 134 9.1. INTRODUCTION 134 9.2. LANDSLIDE RISK ASSESSMENT 135 9.2.1. Landslide risk 135 9.2.2. Risk assessment procedure 136 9.2.3. Related difficulties 136 9.3. LANDSLIDE SUCEPTIBILITY ZONATION 138 9.4. FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TOWARDS LANDSLIDE HAZARD 138 9.4.1. Topography 138 9.4.2. Geology 140 9.4.3. Land use 140 9.4.4. Climate 141 9.4.5. Human factor 142 9.5. RESULTS 144 9.6. REMEDIAL MEASURES 145 9.7. SUMMARY 146 10. GLOBAL RISK ASSESSMENT: EXTRAPOLATION TO INDIA 147 10.1. INTRODUCTION 147 10.2. SEISMICTIY OF INDIA 147 10.2.1. 1988 Bihar earthquake 147 10.2.2. 1991 Uttarkashi earthquake 147 10.2.3. 1993 Killari earthquake 148 10.2.4. 1997 Jabalpur earthquake 148 10.2.5. 1999 Chamoli earthquake 149 10.2.6. 2001 Bhuj earthquake 149 10.3. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS 150 10.4. BUILDING CODE OF INDIA 150 10.5. SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS OF INDIA 152 10.5.1. Seismic hazard map - 1933 Edition 152 10.5.2. Seismic hazard map - 1962 Edition 152 10.5.3. Seismic hazard map - 1966 Edition 153 -viii- Table of Contents 10.5.4. Seismic hazard map - 1970 Edition 153 10.5.5. Seismic hazard map - 2002 Edition 153 10.5.6. Seismic hazard map - GSHAP 1999 153 10.6. BUILDING STOCK OF INDIA 155 10.6.1. Mud/adobe structures 155 10.6.2. Rubble stone masonry structures 155 10.6.3. Brick and Concrete Block Masonry structures 155 10.6.4. Reinforced Concrete Frame structures 155 10.6.5. Timber structures 156 10.7. Building vulnerability Assessment 160 10.8. SUMMARY 161 11. SUMMARY AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS 162 11.1. SUMMARY 162 11.1.1. Building code and seismic zoning maps 162 11.1.2. Field surveys 162 11.1.3. Typical building types 163 11.1.4. Empirical Vulnerability Assessment 163 11.1.5. Unknown capacity of reinforced concrete structures 163 11.1.6. Damage scenarios 163 11.1.7. Reconstruction after 2005 Kashmir earthquake 164 11.1.8. Human causality estimation 164 11.1.9. Landslides 164 11.2. FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS 165 REFERENCES 166 APPENDIX A: STATISTICAL DATA 177 APPENDIX B: EUROPEAN MACROSEISMIC SCALE -1998 190 APPENDIX C: 2005 KASHMIR EARTHQUAKE - DAMAGES 197 APPENDIX D: 2005 EARTHQUAKE -RECONSTRUCTION 204 APPENDIX E: CAPACITY CURVES 211 APPENDIX F: 2008 BALUCHISTAN EARTHQUAKE-DAMAGES.213 DECLARATION 216 CURRICULAM VITAE 217 -ix-.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards
    A National Policy for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Buildings and Procedure for Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Vulnerability Prof. Ravi Sinha and Prof. Alok Goyal Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Background India has experienced several devastating earthquakes in the past resulting in a large number of deaths and severe property damage. During the last century, 4 great earthquakes struck different parts of the country: (1) 1897 Great Assam earthquake, (2) 1905 Kangra earthquake, (3) 1934 Bihar-Nepal earthquake and (4) 1950 Assam earthquake. In recent times, damaging earthquakes experienced in our country include (1) 1988 Bihar Nepal earthquake, (2) 1991 Uttarkashi earthquake, (3) 1993 Killari earthquake, (4) 1997 Jabalpur earthquake, (5) 1999 Chamoli earthquake and (6) 2001 Bhuj earthquake. The frequent occurrence of damaging earthquakes clearly demonstrates the high seismic hazard in India and highlights the need for a comprehensive earthquake disaster risk management policy. The urban areas have experienced very rapid population growth during the last few decades due to economic factors such as decrease in economic opportunities in rural areas and consequent migration to the urban areas. The rapid urbanisation has led to proliferation of slums and has severely strained the resources in our urban areas. Most recent constructions in the urban areas consist of poorly designed and constructed buildings. The older buildings, even if constructed in compliance with relevant standards at that time, may not comply with the more stringent specifications of the latest standards. Until the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, our country was fortunate not to experience a large earthquake in an urban area.
    [Show full text]
  • South Asia Disaster Risk Management Programme
    Synthesis Report on South Asian Region Disaster Risks – Final Report South Asia Disaster Risk Management Programme: Synthesis Report on SAR Countries Disaster Risks Synthesis Report on South Asian Region Disaster Risks – Final Report Table of Content PREFACE................................................................................................................................................IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.........................................................................................................................V LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................................................VI ABBREVIATION USED............................................................................................................................X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 KEY FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 WAY FORWARD ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Additional analyses ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Microzonation Study of South Asian Cities and Its Implications to Urban Risk Resiliency Under Climate Change Scenario
    International Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 11, 197-237 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ijg ISSN Online: 2156-8367 ISSN Print: 2156-8359 Seismic Microzonation Study of South Asian Cities and Its Implications to Urban Risk Resiliency under Climate Change Scenario O. P. Mishra1,2 1National Center for Seismology, Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi, India 2Formerly SAARC Disaster Management Centre, New Delhi (Now Relocated at Gandhinagar), India How to cite this paper: Mishra, O.P. (2020) Abstract Seismic Microzonation Study of South Asian Cities and Its Implications to Urban Risk In this study, an attempt has been made to review the existing framework of Resiliency under Climate Change Scenario. earthquake risk resiliency for the urban agglomerates of South Asian earth- International Journal of Geosciences, 11, quake-prone countries (Afghanistan; Bangladesh; Bhutan, India, and Paki- 197-237. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2020.114012 stan) with aim of suggesting a plausible model for earthquake risk resiliency for urban agglomerates of the region under the influence of uncontrollable Received: December 23, 2019 climate change scenario. We demonstrated that the existing infrastructures Accepted: April 24, 2020 can be retrofitted to mitigate and reduce the nature and extent of damages to Published: April 27, 2020 structures to the greater extent whilst site response based comprehensive Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and seismic microzonation is very much required for new settlements and for Scientific Research Publishing Inc. long-term sustainable urban planning by adopting multi-disciplinary investi- This work is licensed under the Creative gations using integrated tools consisted of geophysical, geological, and geo- Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Sediments and Damage Pattern-A Few
    Nat Hazards (2014) 74:1829–1851 DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1283-4 ORIGINAL PAPER Soft sediments and damage pattern: a few case studies from large Indian earthquakes vis-a-vis seismic risk evaluation Mithila Verma • R. J. Singh • B. K. Bansal Received: 27 November 2012 / Accepted: 2 June 2014 / Published online: 19 June 2014 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract India is prone to earthquake hazard; almost 65 % area falls in high to very high seismic zones, as per the seismic zoning map of the country. The Himalaya and the Indo- Gangetic plains are particularly vulnerable to high seismic hazard. Any major earthquake in Himalaya can cause severe destruction and multiple fatalities in urban centers located in the vicinity. Seismically induced ground motion amplification and soil liquefaction are the two main factors responsible for severe damage to the structures, especially, built on soft sedimentary environment. These are essentially governed by the size of earthquake, epi- central distance and geology of the area. Besides, lithology of the strata, i.e., sediment type, grain size and their distribution, thickness, lateral discontinuity and ground water depth, play an important role in determining the nature and degree of destruction. There has been significant advancement in our understanding and assessment of these two phenomena. However, data from past earthquakes provide valuable information which help in better estimation of ground motion amplification and soil liquefaction for evaluation of seismic risk in future and planning the mitigation strategies. In this paper, we present the case studies of past three large Indian earthquakes, i.e., 1803 Uttaranchal earthquake (Mw 7.5); 1934 Bihar–Nepal earthquake (Mw 8.1) and 2001 Bhuj earthquake (Mw 7.7) and discuss the role of soft sediments particularly, alluvial deposits in relation to the damage pattern due to amplified ground motions and soil liquefaction induced by the events.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Earthquake
    Uttar Pradesh State Disaster Management Plan for Earthquake UTTAR PRADESH STATE DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR EARTHQUAKES Prepared by Devendra Mishra, Scientist SE Head Water Resources Division & Dr. Aniruddha Uniyal, Scientist SC Earth Resources Division Remote sensing Applications Center, Uttar Pradesh Sector ‘G’, Jankipuram Lucknow-226021 Submitted to U.P. Academy of Administration & Management Sector – D, Aliganj, Lucknow – 226024 March, 2010 Uttar Pradesh State Disaster Management Plan for Earthquake List of Acronyms ADM - Additional District Magistrate BSNL - Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited BMTPC - Building Material & Technology Promotion Council CDO - Chief Development Officer CPCB - Central Pollution Control Board CWC - Central Water Commission DCR - District Control Room DM - District Magistrate Dy.SP - Deputy Superintendent of Police DMC - Disaster Management Cell EOC - Emergency Operations Centre ESF - Emergency Support Function FCR - Field Control Room GOI - Government of India HPC - High Powered Committee IMD - Indian Meteorological Department NDMP - National Disaster Management Plan ORS - Oral Re-hydrated Solution PAC - Provincial Armed Constabulary RSAC,U.P. - Remote Sensing Applications Centre Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow SDM - Sub-Divisional Magistrate SP - Superintendent of Police SSP - Sr. Superintendent of Police S & R - Search and Rescue STD - Subscriber Trunk Dialing SAR - Search and Rescue SRC - State Relief Commissioner UN - United Nations UNDP - United Nations Development Programme UPSEB - Uttar Pradesh State Electricity
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquake Risk Assessment of Buildings: Applicability of HAZUS in Dehradun, India
    Earthquake Risk Assessment of Buildings: Applicability of HAZUS in Dehradun, India Brijesh Gulati January, 2006 Earthquake Risk Assessment of Buildings: Applicability of HAZUS in Dehradun, India by Brijesh Gulati Thesis submitted to the International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, Specialisation: (Hazard and Risk Analysis) Thesis Assessment Board Thesis Supervisors Prof. Freek van der Meer, ITC (Chairman) First Supervisor - Ir. M.J.G. Mark Brussel (ITC) Dr. P K Garg, IIT Roorkee (Expert) First Supervisor - Mr. Sandeep Maithani (IIRS) Prof. B S Sokhi (IIRS Member) Second Supervisor- Dr. Cees J van Westen (ITC) Mr. Sandeep Maithani (IIRS Supervisor ) iiiirrss INDIAN INSTITUTE OF REMOTE SENSING, NATIONAL REMOTE SENSING AGENCY (NRSA), DEPARTMENT OF SPACE, GOVT. OF INDIA, DEHRADUN, INDIA & INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION ENSCHEDE, THE NETHERLANDS. I certify that although I may have conferred with others in preparing for this assignment, and drawn upon a range of sources cited in this work, the content of this Thesis Report is my original work. Signed……………. Disclaimer This document describes work undertaken as part of a programme of study at the International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation. All views and opinions expressed therein remain the sole responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of the institute. Acknowledgements I take this opportunity to thank to the Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Department of Space, Government of India and the International Institute of Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands for their collaborative MSc.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Major Construction Pattern
    Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of major construction pattern of the of Srinagar city Maqbool Yousuf1, Kaiser Bukhari1, Ayaz Mohmood Dar1, Abaas Ahmad Mir2 1National Institute of Technology, Srinagar 2 University of Kashmir ABSTRACT The estimation of the seismic risk of settled regions is connected to the level of earthquake hazard, structure susceptibility and degree of exposure to seismicity. Development of vulnerability studies in populated areas can be accomplished pointing to classify building vulnerabilities and mitigate the seismic risk; therefore, a complete identification and inspection survey of the old building stock of Srinagar city has been carried out. The key objective of this paper is to discuss the vulnerability assessment, by presenting a proposed method, which determines the level of vulnerability, then assessing physical damage and its relationship to seismic intensity. We used different seismic hazard exposures on the vulnerability components like demography, land use/land cover (LU/LC), building density, building age, building structure, building material, structural vulnerability and overall seismic pattern. The study indicates that although the lack of present earthquake resistant measures in all these building these buildings have survived the odds of time. Although with age, the strength of these buildings has decreased because of the decaying of construction material. The need of the hour is to renovate these older buildings. Keywords: Srinagar city, seismic risk, older buildings, vulnerability assessment, seismic intensity I INTRODUCTION Earthquakes are a major threat to humanity, eradicating thousands of lives every year in different parts of the world with huge loss to civil infrastructure. National Geophysical Data Centre (http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov) data estimates more than 1.9 million deaths during the last 100 years from earthquakes an average of 17, 000 persons were killed every year.
    [Show full text]
  • District Disaster Management Plan Balaghat
    District Disaster Management Plan Balaghat For School of Good Governance & Policy Analysis, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal Prepared by: Swapnil Jangale MBA (IIT Kanpur) In consultation with SEEDS Technical Services District Disaster Management Plan Balaghat Acknowledgment I express my sincere and heartfelt gratitude to School of Good Governance & Policy Analysis, Bhopal, for giving the opportunity to take this unique experience of developing the District Disaster Management Plan for the district of Jhabua. I would also like to thank the administrative department of Balaghat– Mr. Vivek Porwal(Collector), Mr V. Kiran Gopal (CEO JIla Panchayat), Mr. M.S. Maravi (District Commandant Home Guard) for his support. I would also thank all the line departments for cooperating and providing me with necessary data. I would also like to give by thanks to Dr. Rizvi (Director-SGPA), Mr. Gaurav Khare (Project Officer-SGPA) and other staff members of School of Good Governance and Policy Analysis, Bhopal for their valuable suggestion and help during each and every moment of this study I would also thank SEEDS Technical Team – Mr Amit Tuteja and Mr Sunish Jose for providing me with all possible resources, guidance and support during the course of my study. Finally I would thank all those who worked for me directly or indirectly and which has left an everlasting memory in my mind. 2 District Disaster Management Plan Balaghat Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENT...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Hazard Estimation at Omkareshwar Hydroelectric Project Dam Site Rakesh Kumar Grover1, R
    American International Journal of Available online at http://www.iasir.net Research in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics ISSN (Print): 2328-3491, ISSN (Online): 2328-3580, ISSN (CD-ROM): 2328-3629 AIJRSTEM is a refereed, indexed, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary and open access journal published by International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research (IASIR), USA (An Association Unifying the Sciences, Engineering, and Applied Research) Seismic Hazard Estimation at Omkareshwar Hydroelectric Project Dam Site Rakesh Kumar Grover1, R. K. Tripathi2, Rajeev Chandak3, H. K. Mishra4 1Associaate Professsor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jabalpur Engineering College, Jabalpur (M.P.), India. 2Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Raipur (C.G.) India. 3Professor & Head, Department of Civil Engineering, Jabalpur Engineering College, Jabalpur (M.P.), India. 4Principal, Indira Gandhi Engineering College, Sagar, (M.P.), India. Abstract: Omkareshwar Hydrolectric Project is constructed across the river Narmada in the downstream of famous Narmada Sagar multipurpose project in the state of Madhya Pradesh (India). In this study seismic hazard has been estimated at Omkareshwar Dam site. Effects of all the faults, which can produce earthquake equal to or more than 3.5 Magnitude and those within a radius of 300 Km from the centre of the Concrete Gravity Dam have been considered. The history of earthquakes indicated that a total 52 earthquakes, of magnitude 3.5 or more have been occurred in last 172 years. The maximum magnitude reported within the region of consideration is 6.2 in a1938 in Satpura range. The probabilistic Seismic Hazard analysis has been used. Probabilistic Rsults are presented in the form of peak ground acceleration and seismic hazard curves.
    [Show full text]
  • Elaboration of Data Layers for Global Earthquake Models: Case Study Pakistan
    Elaboration of Data Layers for Global Earthquake Models: Case Study Pakistan Dissertation as a requirement for the degree of Doktor-Ingenieur at the Faculty of Civil Engineering Bauhaus-University Weimar Submitted by: Syed Tariq Maqsood, M.Sc. from Islamabad (Pakistan) 15 August 2011 Weimar Dedication DEDICATION To my loving parents Abstract ABSTRACT Earthquakes are amongst the worst natural disasters that could cause vast devastation, lots of casualties and enormous economic loss. Earthquake risk assessment is a technique usually adopted by engineers and decision-makers to mitigate the undesirable results of such disasters. The goal of a seismic risk assessment is the estimation of the consequences of seismic events upon a geographical area (a city, a region, a state or a nation) in a certain period of time. The results provided by an earthquake risk analysis can be regarded as helpful guidelines in respect to all the phases of the risk management: during normal periods, during crisis periods, as well as in the recovery and post-emergency periods. The aim of this Ph.D. thesis is the elaboration of data layers for earthquake risk assessment. Several field surveys have been conducted to define typical building types in the study area, i.e., Pakistan, and to assess vulnerability of the building stock. Special surveys after the damaging 2005 Kashmir and 2008 Baluchistan earthquakes helped to identify the typical failure mechanisms of different construction types and the factors contributed to their failure. Reconstruction after the 2005 Kashmir earthquake is also observed and key statistics have been collected to compare the risk level before and after the reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Kolkata City, India
    Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1103–1121, 2015 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/15/1103/2015/ doi:10.5194/nhess-15-1103-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of Kolkata City, India S. K. Nath, M. D. Adhikari, N. Devaraj, and S. K. Maiti Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, 721302, West Bengal, India Correspondence to: S. K. Nath ([email protected]) Received: 10 December 2013 – Published in Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: 30 April 2014 Revised: 2 December 2014 – Accepted: 4 May 2015 – Published: 2 June 2015 Abstract. The city of Kolkata is one of the most urbanized last 100 years accounted for more than 1.9 million deaths. and densely populated regions in the world and a major in- An estimated average of 17 000 persons were killed ev- dustrial and commercial hub of the eastern and northeastern ery year. Seismic vulnerability in India is well evidenced region of India. In order to classify the seismic risk zones by numerous past earthquake-related calamities viz. 1993 of Kolkata we used seismic hazard exposures on the vulner- Killary earthquake of Mw D 6.2, 1997 Jabalpur earthquake ability components, namely land use/land cover, population of Mw D 5.8, 1999 Chamoli earthquake of Mw D 6.8, 2001 density, building typology, age and height. We microzoned Bhuj earthquake of Mw D 7.7, 2005 Kashmir earthquake of seismic hazard of the city by integrating seismological, ge- Mw D 7.6 and 2011 Sikkim earthquake of Mw D 6.9.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Earthquakes and Dams in India
    ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal) Visit: www.ijirset.com Vol. 7, Issue 9, September 2018 An Overview of Earthquakes and Dams in India Azhar Husain Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering. Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India ABSTRACT: Dams are one of the biggest structures built on the Earth. They are known as a life line structure, as they serve the purpose of irrigation, hydro-electric power generation, flood control, domestic and industrial water supply etc., which are important for the existence of humans. This makes a dam a reliable structure. For this reason, dams should always be designed for the highest safety, resisting worst forces of nature. India is a country with nearly 5,100 massive dams. India is also a seismically active country with over 1,040 active faults. Earthquake events like 1988 Bihar, 1991 Uttarkashi, 1993 Killari, 1997 Jabalpur, 1999 Chamoli, 2001 Bhuj, 2002 Andaman, 2004 Sumatra, 2005 Kashmir, and 2011 Sikkim have caused a huge loss of life and property in the country. Also events like 1992 Landers, 1994 Northridge, 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu and few other events that took place around the world proved how devastating an earthquake could be, particularly if it is near-field. KEYWORDS: Dam, earthquake, near-field earthquake, numerical modelling, discrete element modelling. I. INTRODUCTION Dams are an impressive construction in our world and it’s a fascinating chapter of our history to investigate their origin. History tells, that these constructions are not the innovations of today, because the first predecessors existed even 6000 years before the modern times.
    [Show full text]