DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2009.11735V2 [Astro-Ph.HE] 7 Dec 2020 Gests a Correlation Between Magnetars and Frbs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2009.11735V2 [Astro-Ph.HE] 7 Dec 2020 Gests a Correlation Between Magnetars and Frbs Draft version December 8, 2020 Preprint typeset using LATEX style AASTeX6 v. 1.0 CONFRONTING THE MAGNETAR INTERPRETATION OF FAST RADIO BURSTS THROUGH THEIR HOST GALAXY DEMOGRAPHICS Mohammadtaher Safarzadeh1,2, J. Xavier Prochaska1,3, Kasper E. Heintz4, and Wen-fai Fong5 1Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA [email protected] 2Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 3Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (Kavli IPMU), 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-8583, Japan 4Centre for Astrophysics and Cosmology, Science Institute, University of Iceland, Dunhagi 5, 107 Reykjav´ık,Iceland 5 Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA) and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA ABSTRACT We explore the millisecond magnetar progenitor scenario in the context of fast radio burst (FRB) host galaxies demographics and offset distributions. Magnetars are neutron stars with strong magnetic fields on the order of 1015 G with a short decay lifetime of less than 104 years. Due to their extremely short lifetimes, magnetars should follow the demographics of galaxies according to their current star- formation rate (SFR). Moreover, we hypothesize that magnetars should follow the SFR profile within galaxies, which we assume to follow an exponential profile. We construct a simple model for the host galaxies of magnetars assuming these events track SFR in all galaxies and compare it to observed properties from a sample of 10 secure FRB hosts. We find the distribution of observed SFRs is inconsistent with the model at > 95% c.l. The offset distribution is consistent with this scenario; however, this could be due to the limited sample size and the seeing limited estimates for the effective radii of the FRB host galaxies. Despite the recent association of an FRB with a magnetar in the Milky Way, magnetars may not be the only source of FRBs in the universe, yet any other successful model must account for the demographics of the FRB host in SFR and their observed galactocentric offsets. 1. INTRODUCTION holds (e.g. Fong & Berger 2013; Lunnan et al. 2014; Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are brilliant (1037 K) GHz Schulze et al. 2020; Blanchard et al. 2016), studying the milliseconds duration pulses (see Petroff et al. 2019; host galaxy properties and the physical offsets may be Cordes & Chatterjee 2019, for recent reviews). To ex- critical to constraining the likely progenitor channels of plain these enigmatic millisecond-duration radio flares, a FRBs. For example, if FRBs originate from millisecond whole suite of theories have been proposed ranging from magnetars, we expect the host galaxies of such FRBs to the collision of asteroids with neutron stars to magnetars trace the demographics of galaxies in star formation rate. While more than ∼ 100 FRBs have now been de- (see Platts et al. 2019, for a compilation of the current 1 theories). tected (Petroff et al. 2016) , only a dozen have been accurately localized and associated with a host galaxy The recent association of FRB 200428 with a magnetar 2 SGR 1935+2154 in the Milky Way (The CHIME/FRB (Bhandari et al. 2020; Heintz et al. 2020) . The first host Collaboration et al. 2020; Bochenek et al. 2020a), sug- galaxy detection of an extragalactic FRB, FRB 121102 in a starburst galaxy at z = 0:1927 (Chatterjee et al. 2017; arXiv:2009.11735v2 [astro-ph.HE] 7 Dec 2020 gests a correlation between magnetars and FRBs. Al- tough FRB 200428 is two orders of magnitude fainter Tendulkar et al. 2017), showed remarkable similarities than the weakest extragalactic FRBs, it is still possible with galaxies hosting long-duration gamma-ray bursts that this magnetar produced a burst that constitutes the (LGRBs) and superluminous supernovae (SLSNe), moti- faint end of the extragalactic FRB sources. Such weak vating a scenario where FRBs are produced by young, FRBs would reach the detection limit of current facilities millisecond magnetars (Metzger et al. 2017). How- if they originated at redshifts z > 0:1, and are therefore ever, later studies revealed that the host galaxy of FRB difficult to detect at cosmological distances. On the other 121102 is anomalous compared to most other FRB hosts, hand, we could imagine two separate classes of magne- which are typically massive galaxies with modest star- tars that could be associated with FRBs. One that comes formation rates (Bhandari et al. 2020). These global from millisecond magnetars, and one from ordinary mag- properties are more consistent with the hosts of short- netars. If the previous history with other transient classes 1 Published online here: http://frbcat.org. 2 See also http://frbhosts.org. 2 duration GRBs (SGRBs) and core-collapse or Type Ia the effective radius Re are summarized in Table1. We SNe (Li & Zhang 2020). The observed large physical off- note that approximately half of the hosts exhibit LINER- sets of FRBs relative to their host galaxy centers also like line-emission that may imply an over-estimate of the support the latter scenario, with most bursts appearing true SFR, which were primarily derived from Hα fluxes to occur in the lower surface brightness regions of their (Heintz et al. 2020). We further note that the Re values hosts (Heintz et al. 2020). These results demonstrate were derived primarily from seeing-limited observations, that FRBs are produced in a variety of host galaxy envi- and the true measures may be systematically smaller. ronments. If they all originate from magnetars, this also Here, we also include the measured projected physical suggests that they may be produced through a range offsets of the FRBs relative to their host galaxy centers. of progenitor channels, as various channels have different We then compare the observed distribution of the FRB expectations for host galaxy demographics (Nicholl et al. host galaxies, in terms of their stellar mass, SFR, and 2017; Margalit et al. 2019), or via a single progenitor, their offset distribution, with theoretical expectations which can accommodate a diverse range of host prop- based on the millisecond magnetar progenitor model. To erties (e.g., delay time distributions) and galactocentric do so, we take the following steps: offsets. The typical large offsets observed in the case of SGRBs, i. At a given redshift, we sample the distribution from however, is attributed to binary neutron stars that are the halo mass function (Tinker et al. 2008). We born with significant velocities up to hundreds of km s−1 limit our sample to halos with dark matter halo 10 3 traveling for tens of Myr to several Gyr to reach such mass Mh > 10 M . far distances from their host galaxies (Fong & Berger ii. We assign to each halo a stellar-mass following the 2013; Zevin et al. 2019). The same logic cannot be ap- stellar-mass to halo-mass relation derived in halo- plied to FRBs assuming that they originate from millisec- abundance matching techniques (e.g., Behroozi ond magnetars, since their large magnetic field strengths 14 et al. 2013). (B & 10 G; Kouveliotou et al. 1998) should decay on the decay-lifetime of no more than τ ∼ 104 years (Colpi iii. To each galaxy we assign a star formation rate et al. 2000; Dall'Osso et al. 2012; Vigan`oet al. 2013; (SFR) based on the SFR-M? relation of main- Beniamini et al. 2019). This short active lifetime lim- sequence star-forming galaxies from Whitaker et al. its the millisecond magnetars' location to their birth- (2012). place. In the context of the millisecond magnetar sce- nario, the observed large physical offset distribution of iv. We apply the model assumption that the FRB host FRBs can, therefore, only be accounted for if there is a galaxies are selected according to their SFR. This is non-negligible probability for the millisecond magnetar based on the assumption that since magnetars orig- to be born at their observed location. inate from massive stars, they will occur in galax- In this Letter we test the hypothesis that FRBs are as- ies with active star formation. Therefore, for each sociated with millisecond magnetars with a simple model host, we assign a weight (wi) to each galaxy (i) for the host galaxy population of such magnetars. While proportional to its SFR. other works have tried to constrain this via direct com- v. We probabilistically consider a fraction of galaxies parisons to other astronomical transient sample (e.g. to be quenched based on their stellar mass follow- Bhandari et al. 2020; Li & Zhang 2020; Heintz et al. 2020; ing fits to the results presented in Behroozi et al. Bochenek et al. 2020b), we here provide an independent (2019). The quenched galaxies are then removed test based on theoretical expectations. In 2 we describe § from the sample. our method to estimate the probability of accounting for the observed offset of FRBs given their short lifetime, vi. We subsequently construct the cumulative distri- and in § 3 we present our results. In § 4 we discuss the bution function (CDF) of the stellar mass distribu- role of natal kicks and show its irrelevance in the context tion of all the galaxies at a given redshift. of millisecond magnetar engine interpretation of FRBs, unlike that of SGRBs. Finally, in § 5 we discuss the vii. We compare this global CDF to the corresponding implications of the offset data for the progenitors of the CDF of the FRB hosts through a two sample KS FRBs and conclude on our work. statistics and repor the associated p-values. 3. RESULTS 2. DATA AND METHODS A comparison of the inferred stellar mass and SFR dis- In this work, we adopt the FRB host galaxy stellar tributions of the FRB hosts with the theoretical expecta- population properties derived by Heintz et al.(2020).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exors and the Stellar Birthline Mackenzie S
    A&A 600, A133 (2017) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630196 & c ESO 2017 Astrophysics EXors and the stellar birthline Mackenzie S. L. Moody1 and Steven W. Stahler2 1 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astronomy Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA e-mail: [email protected] Received 6 December 2016 / Accepted 23 February 2017 ABSTRACT We assess the evolutionary status of EXors. These low-mass, pre-main-sequence stars repeatedly undergo sharp luminosity increases, each a year or so in duration. We place into the HR diagram all EXors that have documented quiescent luminosities and effective temperatures, and thus determine their masses and ages. Two alternate sets of pre-main-sequence tracks are used, and yield similar results. Roughly half of EXors are embedded objects, i.e., they appear observationally as Class I or flat-spectrum infrared sources. We find that these are relatively young and are located close to the stellar birthline in the HR diagram. Optically visible EXors, on the other hand, are situated well below the birthline. They have ages of several Myr, typical of classical T Tauri stars. Judging from the limited data at hand, we find no evidence that binarity companions trigger EXor eruptions; this issue merits further investigation. We draw several general conclusions. First, repetitive luminosity outbursts do not occur in all pre-main-sequence stars, and are not in themselves a sign of extreme youth. They persist, along with other signs of activity, in a relatively small subset of these objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Formation in the “Gulf of Mexico”
    A&A 528, A125 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912671 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics Star formation in the “Gulf of Mexico” T. Armond1,, B. Reipurth2,J.Bally3, and C. Aspin2, 1 SOAR Telescope, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 640 N. Aohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA e-mail: [reipurth;caa]@ifa.hawaii.edu 3 Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA e-mail: [email protected] Received 9 June 2009 / Accepted 6 February 2011 ABSTRACT We present an optical/infrared study of the dense molecular cloud, L935, dubbed “The Gulf of Mexico”, which separates the North America and the Pelican nebulae, and we demonstrate that this area is a very active star forming region. A wide-field imaging study with interference filters has revealed 35 new Herbig-Haro objects in the Gulf of Mexico. A grism survey has identified 41 Hα emission- line stars, 30 of them new. A small cluster of partly embedded pre-main sequence stars is located around the known LkHα 185-189 group of stars, which includes the recently erupting FUor HBC 722. Key words. Herbig-Haro objects – stars: formation 1. Introduction In a grism survey of the W80 region, Herbig (1958) detected a population of Hα emission-line stars, LkHα 131–195, mostly The North America nebula (NGC 7000) and the adjacent Pelican T Tauri stars, including the little group LkHα 185 to 189 located nebula (IC 5070), both well known for the characteristic shapes within the dark lane of the Gulf of Mexico, thus demonstrating that have given rise to their names, are part of the single large that low-mass star formation has recently taken place here.
    [Show full text]
  • SXP 1062, a Young Be X-Ray Binary Pulsar with Long Spin Period⋆
    A&A 537, L1 (2012) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118369 & c ESO 2012 Astrophysics Letter to the Editor SXP 1062, a young Be X-ray binary pulsar with long spin period Implications for the neutron star birth spin F. Haberl1, R. Sturm1, M. D. Filipovic´2,W.Pietsch1, and E. J. Crawford2 1 Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstraße, 85748 Garching, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW1797, Australia Received 31 October 2011 / Accepted 1 December 2011 ABSTRACT Context. The Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) is ideally suited to investigating the recent star formation history from X-ray source population studies. It harbours a large number of Be/X-ray binaries (Be stars with an accreting neutron star as companion), and the supernova remnants can be easily resolved with imaging X-ray instruments. Aims. We search for new supernova remnants in the SMC and in particular for composite remnants with a central X-ray source. Methods. We study the morphology of newly found candidate supernova remnants using radio, optical and X-ray images and inves- tigate their X-ray spectra. Results. Here we report on the discovery of the new supernova remnant around the recently discovered Be/X-ray binary pulsar CXO J012745.97−733256.5 = SXP 1062 in radio and X-ray images. The Be/X-ray binary system is found near the centre of the supernova remnant, which is located at the outer edge of the eastern wing of the SMC. The remnant is oxygen-rich, indicating that it developed from a type Ib event.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth and Evolution of Brown Dwarfs
    The Birth and Evolution of Brown Dwarfs Tutorial for the CSPF, or should it be CSSF (Center for Stellar and Substellar Formation)? Eduardo L. Martin, IfA Outline • Basic definitions • Scenarios of Brown Dwarf Formation • Brown Dwarfs in Star Formation Regions • Brown Dwarfs around Stars and Brown Dwarfs • Final Remarks KumarKumar 1963; 1963; D’Antona D’Antona & & Mazzitelli Mazzitelli 1995; 1995; Stevenson Stevenson 1991, 1991, Chabrier Chabrier & & Baraffe Baraffe 2000 2000 Mass • A brown dwarf is defined primarily by its mass, irrespective of how it forms. • The low-mass limit of a star, and the high-mass limit of a brown dwarf, correspond to the minimum mass for stable Hydrogen burning. • The HBMM depends on chemical composition and rotation. For solar abundances and no rotation the HBMM=0.075MSun=79MJupiter. • The lower limit of a brown dwarf mass could be at the DBMM=0.012MSun=13MJupiter. SaumonSaumon et et al. al. 1996 1996 Central Temperature • The central temperature of brown dwarfs ceases to increase when electron degeneracy becomes dominant. Further contraction induces cooling rather than heating. • The LiBMM is at 0.06MSun • Brown dwarfs can have unstable nuclear reactions. Radius • The radii of brown dwarfs is dominated by the EOS (classical ionic Coulomb pressure + partial degeneracy of e-). • The mass-radius relationship is smooth -1/8 R=R0m . • Brown dwarfs and planets have similar sizes. Thermal Properties • Arrows indicate H2 formation near the atmosphere. Molecular recombination favors convective instability. • Brown dwarfs are ultracool, fully convective, objects. • The temperatures of brown dwarfs can overlap with those of stars and planets. Density • Brown dwarfs and planets (substellar-mass objects) become denser and cooler with time, when degeneracy dominates.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 a Theoretical and Observational Overview of Brown
    Chapter 1 A theoretical and observational overview of brown dwarfs Stars are large spheres of gas composed of 73 % of hydrogen in mass, 25 % of helium, and about 2 % of metals, elements with atomic number larger than two like oxygen, nitrogen, carbon or iron. The core temperature and pressure are high enough to convert hydrogen into helium by the proton-proton cycle of nuclear reaction yielding sufficient energy to prevent the star from gravitational collapse. The increased number of helium atoms yields a decrease of the central pressure and temperature. The inner region is thus compressed under the gravitational pressure which dominates the nuclear pressure. This increase in density generates higher temperatures, making nuclear reactions more efficient. The consequence of this feedback cycle is that a star such as the Sun spend most of its lifetime on the main-sequence. The most important parameter of a star is its mass because it determines its luminosity, ef- fective temperature, radius, and lifetime. The distribution of stars with mass, known as the Initial Mass Function (hereafter IMF), is therefore of prime importance to understand star formation pro- cesses, including the conversion of interstellar matter into stars and back again. A major issue regarding the IMF concerns its universality, i.e. whether the IMF is constant in time, place, and metallicity. When a solar-metallicity star reaches a mass below 0.072 M ¡ (Baraffe et al. 1998), the core temperature and pressure are too low to burn hydrogen stably. Objects below this mass were originally termed “black dwarfs” because the low-luminosity would hamper their detection (Ku- mar 1963).
    [Show full text]
  • The UV Perspective of Low-Mass Star Formation
    galaxies Review The UV Perspective of Low-Mass Star Formation P. Christian Schneider 1,* , H. Moritz Günther 2 and Kevin France 3 1 Hamburger Sternwarte, University of Hamburg, 21029 Hamburg, Germany 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research; Cambridge, MA 02109, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80203, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 January 2020; Accepted: 29 February 2020; Published: 21 March 2020 Abstract: The formation of low-mass (M? . 2 M ) stars in molecular clouds involves accretion disks and jets, which are of broad astrophysical interest. Accreting stars represent the closest examples of these phenomena. Star and planet formation are also intimately connected, setting the starting point for planetary systems like our own. The ultraviolet (UV) spectral range is particularly suited for studying star formation, because virtually all relevant processes radiate at temperatures associated with UV emission processes or have strong observational signatures in the UV range. In this review, we describe how UV observations provide unique diagnostics for the accretion process, the physical properties of the protoplanetary disk, and jets and outflows. Keywords: star formation; ultraviolet; low-mass stars 1. Introduction Stars form in molecular clouds. When these clouds fragment, localized cloud regions collapse into groups of protostars. Stars with final masses between 0.08 M and 2 M , broadly the progenitors of Sun-like stars, start as cores deeply embedded in a dusty envelope, where they can be seen only in the sub-mm and far-IR spectral windows (so-called class 0 sources).
    [Show full text]
  • The FIRST STARS in the UNIVERSE WERE TYPICALLY MANY TIMES More Massive and Luminous Than the Sun
    THEFIRST STARS IN THE UNIVERSE Exceptionally massive and bright, the earliest stars changed the course of cosmic history We live in a universe that is full of bright objects. On a clear night one can see thousands of stars with the naked eye. These stars occupy mere- ly a small nearby part of the Milky Way galaxy; tele- scopes reveal a much vaster realm that shines with the light from billions of galaxies. According to our current understanding of cosmology, howev- er, the universe was featureless and dark for a long stretch of its early history. The first stars did not appear until perhaps 100 million years after the big bang, and nearly a billion years passed before galaxies proliferated across the cosmos. Astron- BY RICHARD B. LARSON AND VOLKER BROMM omers have long wondered: How did this dramat- ILLUSTRATIONS BY DON DIXON ic transition from darkness to light come about? 4 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN Updated from the December 2001 issue COPYRIGHT 2004 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. EARLIEST COSMIC STRUCTURE mmostost likely took the form of a network of filaments. The first protogalaxies, small-scale systems about 30 to 100 light-years across, coalesced at the nodes of this network. Inside the protogalaxies, the denser regions of gas collapsed to form the first stars (inset). COPYRIGHT 2004 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. After decades of study, researchers The Dark Ages to longer wavelengths and the universe have recently made great strides toward THE STUDY of the early universe is grew increasingly cold and dark. As- answering this question. Using sophisti- hampered by a lack of direct observa- tronomers have no observations of this cated computer simulation techniques, tions.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Star and Planet Formation
    3 Star and planet formation Part I: Star formation Abstract: All galaxies with a significant mass fraction of molecular gas show continuous formation of new stars. To form stars out of molecular clouds the physical properties of the gas have to change dramatically. Star formation is therefore all about: Initiating the collapse (Jeans criterion, demagnetization by ambipolar diffusion, external triggering) Compression of the gas by self-gravity Losing angular momentum (magnetic braking and fragmentation) 3.1 Criteria for gravitational collapse The basic idea to cause a molecular cloud to collapse due to its own gravity is to just make it massive enough, but the details are quite tricky. We look first at the Jeans criterion that gives the order of magnitude mass necessary for gravitational collapse. Then we consider the influence of a magnetic field before we discuss mechanisms for triggering a collapse by external forces. Jeans criterion (Sir James Jeans, 1877–1946): Let us consider the Virial theorem 20EEkin pot It describes the (time-averaged) state of a stable, gravitationally bound (and ergodic) system. Collins (1978) wrote a wonderful book on the Virial theorem including its derivation and applications in astrophysics, which has also been made available online (http://ads.harvard.edu/books/1978vtsa.book/). The Virial theorem applies to a variety of astrophysical objects including self-gravitating gas clouds, stars, planetary systems, stars in galaxies, and clusters of galaxies. Basically it describes the equilibrium situation of a gas for which pressure and gravitational forces are in balance. Depending on the values of kinetic and potential energies the following behavior results: Astrobiology: 3 Star and planet formation S.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Thesis10.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School The Eberly College of Science POPULATION SYNTHESIS AND ITS CONNECTION TO ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVABLES A Thesis in Astronomy and Astrophysics Michael S. Sipior c 2003 Michael S. Sipior Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2003 We approve the thesis of Michael S. Sipior Date of Signature Michael Eracleous Assistant Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee Steinn Sigurdsson Assistant Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics Gordon P. Garmire Evan Pugh Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics W. Niel Brandt Associate Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics L. Samuel Finn Professor of Physics Peter I. M´esz´aros Distinguished Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics Head of the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Abstract In this thesis, I present a model used for binary population synthesis, and 8 use it to simulate a starburst of 2 10 M over a duration of 20 Myr. This × population reaches a maximum 2{10 keV luminosity of 4 1040 erg s−1, ∼ × attained at the end of the star formation episode, and sustained for a pe- riod of several hundreds of Myr by succeeding populations of XRBs with lighter companion stars. An important property of these results is the min- imal dependence on poorly-constrained values of the initial mass function (IMF) and the average mass ratio between accreting and donating stars in XRBs. The peak X-ray luminosity is shown to be consistent with recent observationally-motivated correlations between the star formation rate and total hard (2{10 keV) X-ray luminosity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 26 Pre-Main Sequence Evolution
    Lecture 26 Low-Mass Young Stellar Objects 1. Nearby Star Formation 2. General Properties of Young Stars 3. T Tauri Stars 4. Herbig Ae/Be Stars References Adams, Lizano & Shu ARAA 25 231987 Lada OSPS 1999 Stahler & Palla Chs. 17 & 18 Local Star Forming Regions Much of our knowledge of star formation comes from a few nearby regions Taurus-Auriga & Perseus – 150 pc low mass (sun-like) stars Orion – 450 pc high & low mass stars [Grey – Milky Way Black – Molecular clouds] Representative for the Galaxy as a whole? Stahler & Palla Fig 1.1 PERSEUS with famous objects AURIGA NGC 1579 B5 IC 348 NGC 1333 TMC-1 T Tau L1551 TAURUS Taurus, Auriga & Perseus • A cloud complex rich in cores & YSOs • NGC1333/IC 348 • Pleiades •TMC-1,2 • T Tauri & other TTSs • L 1551 Ophiuchus Wilking et al. 1987 AJ 94 106 CO Andre PP IV Orion L1630 L1630 star clusters L1630 in Orion NIR star clusters on CS(2-1) map E Lada, ApJ 393 25 1992 4 M(L1630) ~ 8x10 Msun 5 massive cores (~ 200 Msun) associated with NIR star clusters 2. General Properties Young stars are associated with molecular clouds. Observations are affected by extinction, which decreases with increasing wavelength. Loosely speaking, we can distinguish two types: Embedded stars - seen only at NIR or longer wavelengths, usually presumed to be very young Revealed stars - seen at optical wavelengths or shorter, usually presumed to be older What makes young stars particularly interesting is Circumstellar gas and dust – both flowing in as well as out, e.g., jets, winds, & disks.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Formation in the Galaxy, an Observational Overview
    1 Star Formation in the Galaxy, An Observational Overview Charles J. Lada1;¤) 1Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA USA 02138 (Received ) The problems of star and planet formation are among the most important challenges facing modern astrophysical research. Stars and their accompanying planetary systems are continuously being formed in the Galaxy enabling direct observation and investigation of the star forming process. However, stars form invisibly deep within cold and dark molecular clouds. Observations of these stellar birth sites at infrared and millimeter wavelengths from space and the ground have resulted in considerable progress toward a physical understanding of stellar origins. In this contribution I will review the empirical basis for our current understanding of the process of star formation with an emphasis on the origin of low mass (sunlike) stars. x1. Introduction Stars are the fundamental objects of the Cosmos. They are the homes of plane- tary systems and they provide the energy necessary for the development and main- tenance of life. The evolution of stars drives the evolution of all stellar systems in- cluding clusters and galaxies. Stellar Evolution also controls the chemical evolution of the universe. The physical natures and life histories of stars are well described by the theory of stellar structure and evolution, one of the great achievements of 20th century astronomy. According to this theory stars are self-gravitating balls of (mostly) hydrogen gas that act as thermonuclear furnaces to convert the primary product of the big bang (hydrogen) into the heavier elements of the periodic table. For most of its life a star maintains a state of stable equilibrium in which the in- ward force of gravity is balanced by the outward force of pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Formation in Low Metallicity Gas
    Star formation in Low Metallicity Gas Charlotte Christensen University of Arizona Tom Quinn, Fabio Governato, James Wadsley 1 Motivation ª How does star formation proceed in low- metallicity gas where H2 is rare? ª Deviations from solar K-S relation ª Theoretical: Pelupessy+ 2006; Robertson & Kravtsov, 2008; Gnedin & Kravtsov, 2010 ª Observational: Bigiel+ 2010, Bolatto+ 2011 ª Potentially reduces of star formation in dwarfs ª Krumholz & Dekel, 2012; Kuhlen+ 2012; Kuhlen+ 2013; Thompson+ 2013 2 Gasoline (Wadsley, et al., 2003) ª SPH code with ª Which reproduces ª Cosmic UV background ª Damped Lyman-α systems (Pontzen et al., 2008, radiation 2010) ª H & He ionization ª Mass-metallicity relation (Brooks et al., 2007) ª Metal line cooling (Shen+ 2010) ª Broken exponential disks in spirals (Roskar et al., ª Metal diffusion 2008) ª Supernovae feedback ª Tully-Fisher relation (Governato et al., 2007) (blastwave) (Stinson+ 2006) ª Realistic rotation curves ª Non-equillibrium in dwarfs (Governato et al., Molecular Hydrogen 2010) (Christensen+ 2012) ª Reduced bulge mass in spiral galaxies ª Molecular Hydrogen- (Guedes et al., 2011) based star formation ª Change the angular (Christensen+ 2012) momentum distribution (Brook et al., 2011, Pontzen et al., 2011) ª … 3 Implementing Molecular Hydrogen Formation Destruction ª Forms primarily on ª Destroyed primarily by LW radiation dust (metals) (Wolfire et ª Flux from local young al., 2008) stars ª Metallicity ª Self-shielding and ª Density shielding by dust (Draine & Bertoldi, 1996) ª Gas clumpiness (McKee
    [Show full text]