10. Star Formation Driven Feedback

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

10. Star Formation Driven Feedback 10. Star formation driven feedback Stars can output energy in three different channels: radiation neutrino emission mass flow. The energy output in radiation can be obtained by integrating the luminosity of a star over its lifetime. Typically, a star of 53.5 52.5 Solar mass emits about 10 erg in radiation, while the corresponding numbers for 10 M⊙ and 100 M⊙ stars are ∼ 10 erg and ∼ 1053.7 erg, respectively. A star also emits ∼ 1056 neutrinos when it becomes a white dwarf or a red giant, and the total energy involved is of the order 1052 erg. Not including contributions from supernova explosions. Of particular interest is the kinetic energy that is loaded in supernova ejecta and stellar winds, because such energy may be effectively injected into the ISM, affecting the gas properties and star formation in galaxies. We now examine how much mass-loaded kinetic energy is expected from individual stars. 10.5.1 Mass-Loaded Kinetic Energy - Stellar Winds Some stars can lose substantial amounts of mass via stellar winds during their late evolutionary stage. Mass loss can be calculated from stellar evolution theory: 10.5.1 Mass-Loaded Kinetic Energy - Stellar Winds Conventionally, a stellar wind is specified by its mass-loss rate, M ̇ , and its terminal velocity, v∞. The kinetic energy of the wind, sometimes called the wind ‘luminosity’, is: The challenge is then to relate both M ̇ and v∞ to the global properties of stars, such as luminosity, effective temperature, mass and radius. Based on about 300 stars of all spectral types and luminosities, Waldron (1984) suggests the following relations: −1 −1 −1 where M ̇ is in M⊙ yr , v∞ in kms and Lwind in ergs . −1 The typical wind velocity for supergiant OB stars is about 2000kms , and the corresponding kinetic energy is Ekin ∼ 50 −1 2 4×10 (Mwind/10M⊙)(v∞/2000kms ) erg. This energy is comparable to the kinetic energy output from a supernova. 10.5.1 Mass-Loaded Kinetic Energy - SN explosions For supernova explosions, the typical mass-loaded kinetic energy can be estimated by modeling in detail supernovae observed in the local Universe: the mass-loaded kinetic energies are quite similar for Type Ia and Type II SNe 10.5.1 Mass-Loaded Kinetic Energy - SN explosions As an approximation we may write: For Type Ia SNe, the ejecta masses are in a small range around Mejecta = 1M⊙, - progenitors are C/O white dwarfs near the Chandrasekhar mass limit (1.4M⊙) and such SNe do not leave any remnants behind. In this case, the initial velocity of the ejecta is ∼ 104 kms−1. In contrast, the ejecta mass of Type II SNe can change substantially from object to object, as their progenitors can cover a large mass range and the remnant mass depends on the details of the properties of the progenitor. In this case, the initial velocity is difficult to predict. Fortunately, in applications to galaxy formation and evolution, only the total kinetic energy is relevant, because here the energy in the ejecta is transferred into a gas component that has mass much larger than that of the ejecta itself. 8.6 Evolution of Gaseous Halos with Energy Sources In the presence of energy sources, gas can be heated through non-gravitational processes, such as radiation from stars and AGN, stellar explosions and stellar winds. In the presence of source terms, gasdynamics is described by the following set of mass, momentum and energy conservation equations: where Sm, Smom and Se are the changes per unit time in mass density, momentum density, and energy density due to the sources. 8.6 Evolution of Gaseous Halos with Energy Sources Smom = Smvinj, with vinj the local mean velocity of the injected material, and: 2 where C = n HΛ is the cooling rate per unit volume, H is the (radiative) heating rate per unit volume, and θinj ≡ kBTinj/µmp is the local mean thermal velocity of injected material. If all three source terms are known, the above set of equations can be solved together with the Poisson equation for the gravitational potential Φ. 8.6.1 Blast Waves - Self-Similar Model Blast wave: a large amount of energy is released locally during a short period of time, and the disturbance produced in the medium propagates as a shock wave. Instantaneous release of energy ε0 from a source of negligible size in a uniform medium with density ρ0. Assuming the medium is an ideal fluid and that the mass ejected from the explosion is negligible. This assumption is valid when the mass swept by the expanding shock wave is much larger than the initial mass of the ejecta. In the energy-conserving phase of the evolution, i.e., when the shock wave is at a stage where the total radiated energy is much smaller than ε0, the only time scale involved is t, the age of the explosion, and the only length scale is rsh(t), the radius of the shock wave at time t. In this case, we expect the problem to admit ‘self-similar’ solutions, meaning that any dimensional quantity Q(r,t) at radius r (from the center of the ex- plosion) and time t can be written as Q(r,t) = QchQ(r/R), where Qch is the characteristic value of Q, obtained by combining rsh, t and ρ0 (or ε0). For instance, the gas density, velocity and pressure at (r,t) can be written, respectively, in the following forms: 8.6.1 Blast Waves - Self-Similar Model Once rsh(t) is known, the evolution is completely determined by the forms of the single-variable functions D (λ ), V (λ ) and P (λ ). Since the evolution of rsh(t) should be completely determined by ε0 and ρ0, and since no combination of t, ε0 and ρ0 can give a dimensionless quantity, the most general form of rsh(t) is: Thus, under the assumption of self-similarity, the time dependence of rsh is completely deter- mined by dimensionality considerations. The expansion speed of the shock front is therefore which shows that the shock becomes weaker as it expands. Once vsh is reduced to a level comparable to the sound speed of the ambient medium, the shock disappears. 8.6.1 Blast Waves - Self-Similar Model The above dimensionality analysis can be extended to cases where ρ0 is a power law of r, and ε0 is a power law of t: The value of A in Eq.(8.162) and the forms of D, V and P can all be obtained by solving the fluid equations. In spherical symmetry, the mass, momentum and energy equations are: where we have ignored any heating or cooling. As we have seen in §8.1.1, the last equation can be replaced by the following entropy equation, 8.6.1 Blast Waves - Self-Similar Model Under the assumption of similarity, all quantities depend on r and t only through the com- bination λ = r/rsh(t), and Eqs. (8.166), (8.167) and (8.169) are reduced to the following set of ordinary differential equations: where a prime denotes a derivative with respect to λ , and η = 2/5 is the power of the time- dependence of rsh(t). These equations can be integrated from λ = 1 to λ = 0 subject to the jump conditions (8.49) and (8.50) at λ = 1. Note that these jump conditions are obtained by an observer moving with the shock wave. For an observer at rest with the ambient medium, v1 = −vsh, v2 = vb − vsh, where vb is the rest-frame velocity of the flow just behind the shock front. For strong shocks, the jump conditions are: 8.6.1 Blast Waves - Self-Similar Model An extra condition is required in order to specify the constant A in Eq. (8.162). This condition can be obtained by integrating the energy equation (8.168) over the entire space. Since rv = 0 at both r = 0 and r = ∞, only the first term in Eq. (8.168) contributes to the integration: Outside the shock radius, rsh, the velocity v = 0 and the pressure is a constant P0. The integration from rsh to infinity is then equal to: 8.6.1 Blast Waves - Self-Similar Model For γ = 5/3, this gives A ≈ 1.15. The corresponding density, pressure and velocity profiles are shown in Fig. 8.9. 8.6.1 Blast Waves - Supernova Remnants We can now discuss in more detail the different evolutionary stages of a blast wave. As a concrete example, we consider supernova remnants, which are produced by supernova explosions at the late evolutionary stages of relatively massive stars. The typical energy output of such an explosion is about 1051 erg, released in seconds. Almost all this energy is initially in the form of kinetic energy of the ejecta; the integrated photon luminosity of a supernova is a factor ∼ 100 smaller. However, the supernova ejecta creates a shock that becomes radiative, and by the time the supernova blast wave fades away, almost 95 percent of its energy has been radiated away. Blast wave consists of four well-defined stages: 1) first the ejected mass exceeds the swept-up ambient mass, and to lowest order the ejecta undergo free expansion. 2) once the mass of the swept-up material becomes comparable to the mass of the ejecta, the blast-wave enters the adiabatic (or Sedov) phase, in which the evolution is self-similar as long as the ambient medium is homogeneous. 3) Eventually the radiative losses from the interior of the blast-wave become significant, and the supernova remnant enters the third, radiative stage of its evolution.
Recommended publications
  • Exors and the Stellar Birthline Mackenzie S
    A&A 600, A133 (2017) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630196 & c ESO 2017 Astrophysics EXors and the stellar birthline Mackenzie S. L. Moody1 and Steven W. Stahler2 1 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astronomy Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA e-mail: [email protected] Received 6 December 2016 / Accepted 23 February 2017 ABSTRACT We assess the evolutionary status of EXors. These low-mass, pre-main-sequence stars repeatedly undergo sharp luminosity increases, each a year or so in duration. We place into the HR diagram all EXors that have documented quiescent luminosities and effective temperatures, and thus determine their masses and ages. Two alternate sets of pre-main-sequence tracks are used, and yield similar results. Roughly half of EXors are embedded objects, i.e., they appear observationally as Class I or flat-spectrum infrared sources. We find that these are relatively young and are located close to the stellar birthline in the HR diagram. Optically visible EXors, on the other hand, are situated well below the birthline. They have ages of several Myr, typical of classical T Tauri stars. Judging from the limited data at hand, we find no evidence that binarity companions trigger EXor eruptions; this issue merits further investigation. We draw several general conclusions. First, repetitive luminosity outbursts do not occur in all pre-main-sequence stars, and are not in themselves a sign of extreme youth. They persist, along with other signs of activity, in a relatively small subset of these objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Formation in the “Gulf of Mexico”
    A&A 528, A125 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912671 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics Star formation in the “Gulf of Mexico” T. Armond1,, B. Reipurth2,J.Bally3, and C. Aspin2, 1 SOAR Telescope, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 640 N. Aohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA e-mail: [reipurth;caa]@ifa.hawaii.edu 3 Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA e-mail: [email protected] Received 9 June 2009 / Accepted 6 February 2011 ABSTRACT We present an optical/infrared study of the dense molecular cloud, L935, dubbed “The Gulf of Mexico”, which separates the North America and the Pelican nebulae, and we demonstrate that this area is a very active star forming region. A wide-field imaging study with interference filters has revealed 35 new Herbig-Haro objects in the Gulf of Mexico. A grism survey has identified 41 Hα emission- line stars, 30 of them new. A small cluster of partly embedded pre-main sequence stars is located around the known LkHα 185-189 group of stars, which includes the recently erupting FUor HBC 722. Key words. Herbig-Haro objects – stars: formation 1. Introduction In a grism survey of the W80 region, Herbig (1958) detected a population of Hα emission-line stars, LkHα 131–195, mostly The North America nebula (NGC 7000) and the adjacent Pelican T Tauri stars, including the little group LkHα 185 to 189 located nebula (IC 5070), both well known for the characteristic shapes within the dark lane of the Gulf of Mexico, thus demonstrating that have given rise to their names, are part of the single large that low-mass star formation has recently taken place here.
    [Show full text]
  • SXP 1062, a Young Be X-Ray Binary Pulsar with Long Spin Period⋆
    A&A 537, L1 (2012) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118369 & c ESO 2012 Astrophysics Letter to the Editor SXP 1062, a young Be X-ray binary pulsar with long spin period Implications for the neutron star birth spin F. Haberl1, R. Sturm1, M. D. Filipovic´2,W.Pietsch1, and E. J. Crawford2 1 Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstraße, 85748 Garching, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW1797, Australia Received 31 October 2011 / Accepted 1 December 2011 ABSTRACT Context. The Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) is ideally suited to investigating the recent star formation history from X-ray source population studies. It harbours a large number of Be/X-ray binaries (Be stars with an accreting neutron star as companion), and the supernova remnants can be easily resolved with imaging X-ray instruments. Aims. We search for new supernova remnants in the SMC and in particular for composite remnants with a central X-ray source. Methods. We study the morphology of newly found candidate supernova remnants using radio, optical and X-ray images and inves- tigate their X-ray spectra. Results. Here we report on the discovery of the new supernova remnant around the recently discovered Be/X-ray binary pulsar CXO J012745.97−733256.5 = SXP 1062 in radio and X-ray images. The Be/X-ray binary system is found near the centre of the supernova remnant, which is located at the outer edge of the eastern wing of the SMC. The remnant is oxygen-rich, indicating that it developed from a type Ib event.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth and Evolution of Brown Dwarfs
    The Birth and Evolution of Brown Dwarfs Tutorial for the CSPF, or should it be CSSF (Center for Stellar and Substellar Formation)? Eduardo L. Martin, IfA Outline • Basic definitions • Scenarios of Brown Dwarf Formation • Brown Dwarfs in Star Formation Regions • Brown Dwarfs around Stars and Brown Dwarfs • Final Remarks KumarKumar 1963; 1963; D’Antona D’Antona & & Mazzitelli Mazzitelli 1995; 1995; Stevenson Stevenson 1991, 1991, Chabrier Chabrier & & Baraffe Baraffe 2000 2000 Mass • A brown dwarf is defined primarily by its mass, irrespective of how it forms. • The low-mass limit of a star, and the high-mass limit of a brown dwarf, correspond to the minimum mass for stable Hydrogen burning. • The HBMM depends on chemical composition and rotation. For solar abundances and no rotation the HBMM=0.075MSun=79MJupiter. • The lower limit of a brown dwarf mass could be at the DBMM=0.012MSun=13MJupiter. SaumonSaumon et et al. al. 1996 1996 Central Temperature • The central temperature of brown dwarfs ceases to increase when electron degeneracy becomes dominant. Further contraction induces cooling rather than heating. • The LiBMM is at 0.06MSun • Brown dwarfs can have unstable nuclear reactions. Radius • The radii of brown dwarfs is dominated by the EOS (classical ionic Coulomb pressure + partial degeneracy of e-). • The mass-radius relationship is smooth -1/8 R=R0m . • Brown dwarfs and planets have similar sizes. Thermal Properties • Arrows indicate H2 formation near the atmosphere. Molecular recombination favors convective instability. • Brown dwarfs are ultracool, fully convective, objects. • The temperatures of brown dwarfs can overlap with those of stars and planets. Density • Brown dwarfs and planets (substellar-mass objects) become denser and cooler with time, when degeneracy dominates.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 a Theoretical and Observational Overview of Brown
    Chapter 1 A theoretical and observational overview of brown dwarfs Stars are large spheres of gas composed of 73 % of hydrogen in mass, 25 % of helium, and about 2 % of metals, elements with atomic number larger than two like oxygen, nitrogen, carbon or iron. The core temperature and pressure are high enough to convert hydrogen into helium by the proton-proton cycle of nuclear reaction yielding sufficient energy to prevent the star from gravitational collapse. The increased number of helium atoms yields a decrease of the central pressure and temperature. The inner region is thus compressed under the gravitational pressure which dominates the nuclear pressure. This increase in density generates higher temperatures, making nuclear reactions more efficient. The consequence of this feedback cycle is that a star such as the Sun spend most of its lifetime on the main-sequence. The most important parameter of a star is its mass because it determines its luminosity, ef- fective temperature, radius, and lifetime. The distribution of stars with mass, known as the Initial Mass Function (hereafter IMF), is therefore of prime importance to understand star formation pro- cesses, including the conversion of interstellar matter into stars and back again. A major issue regarding the IMF concerns its universality, i.e. whether the IMF is constant in time, place, and metallicity. When a solar-metallicity star reaches a mass below 0.072 M ¡ (Baraffe et al. 1998), the core temperature and pressure are too low to burn hydrogen stably. Objects below this mass were originally termed “black dwarfs” because the low-luminosity would hamper their detection (Ku- mar 1963).
    [Show full text]
  • The UV Perspective of Low-Mass Star Formation
    galaxies Review The UV Perspective of Low-Mass Star Formation P. Christian Schneider 1,* , H. Moritz Günther 2 and Kevin France 3 1 Hamburger Sternwarte, University of Hamburg, 21029 Hamburg, Germany 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research; Cambridge, MA 02109, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80203, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 January 2020; Accepted: 29 February 2020; Published: 21 March 2020 Abstract: The formation of low-mass (M? . 2 M ) stars in molecular clouds involves accretion disks and jets, which are of broad astrophysical interest. Accreting stars represent the closest examples of these phenomena. Star and planet formation are also intimately connected, setting the starting point for planetary systems like our own. The ultraviolet (UV) spectral range is particularly suited for studying star formation, because virtually all relevant processes radiate at temperatures associated with UV emission processes or have strong observational signatures in the UV range. In this review, we describe how UV observations provide unique diagnostics for the accretion process, the physical properties of the protoplanetary disk, and jets and outflows. Keywords: star formation; ultraviolet; low-mass stars 1. Introduction Stars form in molecular clouds. When these clouds fragment, localized cloud regions collapse into groups of protostars. Stars with final masses between 0.08 M and 2 M , broadly the progenitors of Sun-like stars, start as cores deeply embedded in a dusty envelope, where they can be seen only in the sub-mm and far-IR spectral windows (so-called class 0 sources).
    [Show full text]
  • The FIRST STARS in the UNIVERSE WERE TYPICALLY MANY TIMES More Massive and Luminous Than the Sun
    THEFIRST STARS IN THE UNIVERSE Exceptionally massive and bright, the earliest stars changed the course of cosmic history We live in a universe that is full of bright objects. On a clear night one can see thousands of stars with the naked eye. These stars occupy mere- ly a small nearby part of the Milky Way galaxy; tele- scopes reveal a much vaster realm that shines with the light from billions of galaxies. According to our current understanding of cosmology, howev- er, the universe was featureless and dark for a long stretch of its early history. The first stars did not appear until perhaps 100 million years after the big bang, and nearly a billion years passed before galaxies proliferated across the cosmos. Astron- BY RICHARD B. LARSON AND VOLKER BROMM omers have long wondered: How did this dramat- ILLUSTRATIONS BY DON DIXON ic transition from darkness to light come about? 4 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN Updated from the December 2001 issue COPYRIGHT 2004 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. EARLIEST COSMIC STRUCTURE mmostost likely took the form of a network of filaments. The first protogalaxies, small-scale systems about 30 to 100 light-years across, coalesced at the nodes of this network. Inside the protogalaxies, the denser regions of gas collapsed to form the first stars (inset). COPYRIGHT 2004 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. After decades of study, researchers The Dark Ages to longer wavelengths and the universe have recently made great strides toward THE STUDY of the early universe is grew increasingly cold and dark. As- answering this question. Using sophisti- hampered by a lack of direct observa- tronomers have no observations of this cated computer simulation techniques, tions.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Star and Planet Formation
    3 Star and planet formation Part I: Star formation Abstract: All galaxies with a significant mass fraction of molecular gas show continuous formation of new stars. To form stars out of molecular clouds the physical properties of the gas have to change dramatically. Star formation is therefore all about: Initiating the collapse (Jeans criterion, demagnetization by ambipolar diffusion, external triggering) Compression of the gas by self-gravity Losing angular momentum (magnetic braking and fragmentation) 3.1 Criteria for gravitational collapse The basic idea to cause a molecular cloud to collapse due to its own gravity is to just make it massive enough, but the details are quite tricky. We look first at the Jeans criterion that gives the order of magnitude mass necessary for gravitational collapse. Then we consider the influence of a magnetic field before we discuss mechanisms for triggering a collapse by external forces. Jeans criterion (Sir James Jeans, 1877–1946): Let us consider the Virial theorem 20EEkin pot It describes the (time-averaged) state of a stable, gravitationally bound (and ergodic) system. Collins (1978) wrote a wonderful book on the Virial theorem including its derivation and applications in astrophysics, which has also been made available online (http://ads.harvard.edu/books/1978vtsa.book/). The Virial theorem applies to a variety of astrophysical objects including self-gravitating gas clouds, stars, planetary systems, stars in galaxies, and clusters of galaxies. Basically it describes the equilibrium situation of a gas for which pressure and gravitational forces are in balance. Depending on the values of kinetic and potential energies the following behavior results: Astrobiology: 3 Star and planet formation S.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Thesis10.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School The Eberly College of Science POPULATION SYNTHESIS AND ITS CONNECTION TO ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVABLES A Thesis in Astronomy and Astrophysics Michael S. Sipior c 2003 Michael S. Sipior Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2003 We approve the thesis of Michael S. Sipior Date of Signature Michael Eracleous Assistant Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee Steinn Sigurdsson Assistant Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics Gordon P. Garmire Evan Pugh Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics W. Niel Brandt Associate Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics L. Samuel Finn Professor of Physics Peter I. M´esz´aros Distinguished Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics Head of the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Abstract In this thesis, I present a model used for binary population synthesis, and 8 use it to simulate a starburst of 2 10 M over a duration of 20 Myr. This × population reaches a maximum 2{10 keV luminosity of 4 1040 erg s−1, ∼ × attained at the end of the star formation episode, and sustained for a pe- riod of several hundreds of Myr by succeeding populations of XRBs with lighter companion stars. An important property of these results is the min- imal dependence on poorly-constrained values of the initial mass function (IMF) and the average mass ratio between accreting and donating stars in XRBs. The peak X-ray luminosity is shown to be consistent with recent observationally-motivated correlations between the star formation rate and total hard (2{10 keV) X-ray luminosity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 26 Pre-Main Sequence Evolution
    Lecture 26 Low-Mass Young Stellar Objects 1. Nearby Star Formation 2. General Properties of Young Stars 3. T Tauri Stars 4. Herbig Ae/Be Stars References Adams, Lizano & Shu ARAA 25 231987 Lada OSPS 1999 Stahler & Palla Chs. 17 & 18 Local Star Forming Regions Much of our knowledge of star formation comes from a few nearby regions Taurus-Auriga & Perseus – 150 pc low mass (sun-like) stars Orion – 450 pc high & low mass stars [Grey – Milky Way Black – Molecular clouds] Representative for the Galaxy as a whole? Stahler & Palla Fig 1.1 PERSEUS with famous objects AURIGA NGC 1579 B5 IC 348 NGC 1333 TMC-1 T Tau L1551 TAURUS Taurus, Auriga & Perseus • A cloud complex rich in cores & YSOs • NGC1333/IC 348 • Pleiades •TMC-1,2 • T Tauri & other TTSs • L 1551 Ophiuchus Wilking et al. 1987 AJ 94 106 CO Andre PP IV Orion L1630 L1630 star clusters L1630 in Orion NIR star clusters on CS(2-1) map E Lada, ApJ 393 25 1992 4 M(L1630) ~ 8x10 Msun 5 massive cores (~ 200 Msun) associated with NIR star clusters 2. General Properties Young stars are associated with molecular clouds. Observations are affected by extinction, which decreases with increasing wavelength. Loosely speaking, we can distinguish two types: Embedded stars - seen only at NIR or longer wavelengths, usually presumed to be very young Revealed stars - seen at optical wavelengths or shorter, usually presumed to be older What makes young stars particularly interesting is Circumstellar gas and dust – both flowing in as well as out, e.g., jets, winds, & disks.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Formation in the Galaxy, an Observational Overview
    1 Star Formation in the Galaxy, An Observational Overview Charles J. Lada1;¤) 1Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA USA 02138 (Received ) The problems of star and planet formation are among the most important challenges facing modern astrophysical research. Stars and their accompanying planetary systems are continuously being formed in the Galaxy enabling direct observation and investigation of the star forming process. However, stars form invisibly deep within cold and dark molecular clouds. Observations of these stellar birth sites at infrared and millimeter wavelengths from space and the ground have resulted in considerable progress toward a physical understanding of stellar origins. In this contribution I will review the empirical basis for our current understanding of the process of star formation with an emphasis on the origin of low mass (sunlike) stars. x1. Introduction Stars are the fundamental objects of the Cosmos. They are the homes of plane- tary systems and they provide the energy necessary for the development and main- tenance of life. The evolution of stars drives the evolution of all stellar systems in- cluding clusters and galaxies. Stellar Evolution also controls the chemical evolution of the universe. The physical natures and life histories of stars are well described by the theory of stellar structure and evolution, one of the great achievements of 20th century astronomy. According to this theory stars are self-gravitating balls of (mostly) hydrogen gas that act as thermonuclear furnaces to convert the primary product of the big bang (hydrogen) into the heavier elements of the periodic table. For most of its life a star maintains a state of stable equilibrium in which the in- ward force of gravity is balanced by the outward force of pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Formation in Low Metallicity Gas
    Star formation in Low Metallicity Gas Charlotte Christensen University of Arizona Tom Quinn, Fabio Governato, James Wadsley 1 Motivation ª How does star formation proceed in low- metallicity gas where H2 is rare? ª Deviations from solar K-S relation ª Theoretical: Pelupessy+ 2006; Robertson & Kravtsov, 2008; Gnedin & Kravtsov, 2010 ª Observational: Bigiel+ 2010, Bolatto+ 2011 ª Potentially reduces of star formation in dwarfs ª Krumholz & Dekel, 2012; Kuhlen+ 2012; Kuhlen+ 2013; Thompson+ 2013 2 Gasoline (Wadsley, et al., 2003) ª SPH code with ª Which reproduces ª Cosmic UV background ª Damped Lyman-α systems (Pontzen et al., 2008, radiation 2010) ª H & He ionization ª Mass-metallicity relation (Brooks et al., 2007) ª Metal line cooling (Shen+ 2010) ª Broken exponential disks in spirals (Roskar et al., ª Metal diffusion 2008) ª Supernovae feedback ª Tully-Fisher relation (Governato et al., 2007) (blastwave) (Stinson+ 2006) ª Realistic rotation curves ª Non-equillibrium in dwarfs (Governato et al., Molecular Hydrogen 2010) (Christensen+ 2012) ª Reduced bulge mass in spiral galaxies ª Molecular Hydrogen- (Guedes et al., 2011) based star formation ª Change the angular (Christensen+ 2012) momentum distribution (Brook et al., 2011, Pontzen et al., 2011) ª … 3 Implementing Molecular Hydrogen Formation Destruction ª Forms primarily on ª Destroyed primarily by LW radiation dust (metals) (Wolfire et ª Flux from local young al., 2008) stars ª Metallicity ª Self-shielding and ª Density shielding by dust (Draine & Bertoldi, 1996) ª Gas clumpiness (McKee
    [Show full text]