DOCSLIB.ORG

Effective Field Theory Approaches to Particle Physics Beyond The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effective Field Theory Approaches to Particle Physics Beyond The Effective Field Theory Approaches to Particle Physics Beyond the Standard Model by Zhengkang Zhang A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Physics) in the University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor James D. Wells, Chair Professor Fred C. Adams Professor Aaron T. Pierce Professor Jianming Qian Zhengkang Zhang [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8305-5581 c Zhengkang Zhang 2018 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, James Wells. My development as a scientist has been greatly influenced by his invaluable guidance. He has always encouraged me to pursue independent research, to develop new ideas, and to form my own view of the field, while generously sharing his knowledge, experience and insights to guide my thinking | an approach I deeply appreciate. I would also like to thank Aaron Pierce for teaching me a great deal about the field, especially as my advisor at an early stage of my graduate studies. I am particularly grateful for his patient guidance through my first project, and his continued support and advice later on. Additionally, I would like to thank Christophe Grojean for his support and advice, especially during my stay at DESY Hamburg, where part of this dissertation was completed. I have greatly benefited from working with my other collaborators as well, including Se- bastian Ellis, Alexey Petrov, Stefan Pokorski, J´er´emieQuevillon, Bibhushan Shakya, Andrea Wulzer, Tevong You, and Yue Zhao. My thanks also go to Fred Adams and Jianming Qian for serving on my committee and providing valuable feedback. I am grateful to Ratindranath Akhoury, Henriette Elvang, Finn Larsen, Roberto Merlin, James Wells, and Kathryn Zurek for their inspiring classes from which I have learned a lot of interesting physics. I also would like to thank other (past and current) members of the Leinweber Center for Theoretical Physics (formerly Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics), especially Arash Arabi Ardehali, Raymond Co, Josh Foster, Gordy Kane, Jack Kearney, Nick Orlofsky, Sam Roland, Ben Safdi, and Bob Zheng, for many stimulating conversations. Special thanks go to Mengxing Ye, my brilliant partner in life, for accompanying me through this journey (and teaching me interesting condensed matter physics as well). The work in this dissertation was funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy grant DE-SC0007859, the Rackham Summer Award, Rackham Research Grant, and Rackham Dissertation Fellowship. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii List of Tablesv List of Figures viii List of Appendices xii Chapter 1: Introduction1 1.1 The Standard Model from an EFT perspective . .1 1.2 Precision analyses as indirect probes of new physics . .5 1.3 Bottom-up and top-down EFT approaches . .6 1.4 What's new? . .9 1.5 Outline of this dissertation . 10 Chapter 2: Precision Electroweak Analyses After the Higgs Boson Discovery 13 2.1 Introduction . 13 2.2 Standard Model parameters and observables . 14 2.3 The formalism . 16 2.4 New physics examples . 27 2.5 Conclusions . 34 Chapter 3: Resolving Charm and Bottom Quark Masses in Precision Higgs Analyses 35 3.1 Introduction . 35 3.2 Incorporating low-energy observables into a global precision analysis . 38 3.3 Recasting Higgs observables in terms of low-energy observables . 39 3.4 Theoretical uncertainties of Higgs partial widths . 44 3.5 Conclusions . 49 iii Chapter 4: EFT of Universal Theories and Its RG Evolution 50 4.1 Introduction . 50 4.2 Universal theories at LO and beyond . 53 4.3 RG effects in the electroweak sector . 63 4.4 RG effects in the Yukawa sector . 75 4.5 Conclusions . 78 Chapter 5: Time to Go Beyond TGC Interpretation of W Pair Production 81 5.1 Introduction . 81 5.2 Effective operators and anomalous couplings . 83 5.3 Triple gauge coupling measurements: from LEP2 to LHC . 85 5.4 Toward a high energy picture of Standard Model deviations . 89 5.5 Conclusions . 91 Chapter 6: Covariant Diagrams for One-Loop Matching 92 6.1 Introduction . 92 6.2 Gauge-covariant functional matching . 95 6.3 Covariant diagrams . 104 6.4 Examples . 116 6.5 Conclusions . 143 Chapter 7: EFT Approach to Trans-TeV Supersymmetry 146 7.1 Introduction . 146 7.2 Matching the MSSM onto the SMEFT . 151 7.3 Bottom-tau Yukawa unification . 174 7.4 Higgs couplings in TeV-scale SUSY . 183 7.5 Conclusions . 190 Chapter 8: Summary and Outlook 192 Appendices 194 Bibliography 213 iv List of Tables 2.1 (From [131]) The list of observables, their experimental and reference values, and percent relative uncertainties. 17 2.2 (From [131]) Expansion coefficients, as defined in Eq. (2.20), calculated in the (5) basis of input observables containing ∆αhad. These encode the dependence of the output observables on each input observable. 21 2.3 (From [131]) Percent relative uncertainties for the expansion coefficients cii0 , with all input observables varied in their 1σ range. 24 2.4 (From [131]) The rii0 's defined in Eq. (2.25), characterizing the ratios of second-order vs. first-order terms in the expansion (in units of percentage). 25 2.5 (From [131]) Expansion coefficients calculated in the basis of input observables containing α(mZ ), which are derived from the numbers in Table 2.2 by a change of basis described in Section 2.3.4.................... 28 2.6 (From [131]) The b coefficients defined in Eq. (2.68), characterizing the shift in the output observables due to new physics that shifts vector boson self-energies. 32 4.1 (From [111]) Warsaw basis operator combinations that appear in Luniversal in (4.1), in the notation of [3]. In these expressions, repeated generation y a ! y a y a indices i; j; k; l are summed over, H σ D µH = H σ (DµH) − (DµH) σ H, y ! y y H D µH = H (DµH) − (DµH) H. The Yukawa matrices yu, yd, ye should not be confused with the hypercharges Yf . The SM vector and scalar currents A a α JGµ, JW µ, JBµ, Jy are defined in (4.2). ..................... 54 4.2 (From [111]) Expressions of the 16 universal parameters in terms of the War- saw basis Wilson coefficients in (4.1). These parameters completely charac- terize the indirect BSM effects in universal theories at the dimension-6 level. More details of the universal parameters, including their definition from the effective Lagrangian and their expressions in other bases, can be found in [109]. 56 v 4.3 (From [109, 111]) Higgs basis couplings in terms of the universal parameters. ^ ^ ∆1;2;3 are independent linear combinations of S; T ; W; Y defined in (4.4). c4f collectively denotes four-fermion effective couplings, and dV f stands for the dipole-type V ff couplings. Compared with [7], we have written the fractional W q W mass shift as δm instead of δm, and defined [δgL ]ij in the gauge-eigenstate rather than mass-eigenstate basis. 57 6.1 (From [60]) Building blocks of covariant diagrams for integrating out heavy bosonic fields (and fermionic fields as well if one follows the approach of Eq. (6.60) to square their quadratic operator), in the absence of mixed heavy- light contributions and open covariant derivatives in the X matrix, as derived in Section 6.3.1. All previous universal results in the literature [55,56] can be easily reproduced by computing one-loop covariant diagrams built from these elements; see Section 6.4.1............................ 112 6.2 (From [60]) Additional building blocks of covariant diagrams in the presence of mixed heavy-light contributions to matching, as derived in Section 6.3.2. Example applications can be found in Sections 6.4.2, 6.4.3 and 6.4.5..... 112 6.3 (From [60]) Additional building blocks of covariant diagrams in the presence of open covariant derivatives in the X matrix, as derived in Section 6.3.3, up µ yµ to one-open-covariant-derivative terms PµZ + Z Pµ. Example applications can be found in Section 6.4.3........................... 113 6.4 (From [60]) Additional building blocks of covariant diagrams when Dirac fermions are involved in matching, as derived in Section 6.3.4. These are used when the quadratic operator for fermionic fields is not squared like in Eq. (6.60). Example applications can be found in Sections 6.4.4 and 6.4.5.. 113 6.5 (From [60]) List of universal coefficients in terms of the master integrals de- fined in Eq. (6.67) (Column 1). The UOLEA master formula for one-loop matching reported in [56] is reproduced by adding up traces of the operators in Column 2 with the corresponding universal coefficients, and multiplying the overall factor −ics; see Eq. (6.68). The covariant diagrams used to com- pute each universal coefficient are listed in Column 3. See AppendixB for expressions of the universal coefficients in terms of heavy particle masses. 122 6.6 (From [60]) Summary of the results in Eq. (6.96) for mixed heavy-light con- tributions to one-loop matching for the scalar triplet model. The SM gauge coupling-independent terms for the three operators OT ; OH ; OR in Eq. (6.89) are computed (in the MS scheme). 127 vi 7.1 (From [132]) Heavy fields 'H in the MSSM, their gauge quantum numbers, and conjugate fields (which appear on the left side of QUV). 153 7.2 (From [132]) Light fields 'L in the MSSM, their gauge quantum numbers, and conjugate fields (which appear on the left side of QUV). Primed Weyl fermion fields are unphysical auxiliary fields, to be set to zero at the end of the calculation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantum Field Theory*
    Quantum Field Theory y Frank Wilczek Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Science, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 I discuss the general principles underlying quantum eld theory, and attempt to identify its most profound consequences. The deep est of these consequences result from the in nite number of degrees of freedom invoked to implement lo cality.Imention a few of its most striking successes, b oth achieved and prosp ective. Possible limitation s of quantum eld theory are viewed in the light of its history. I. SURVEY Quantum eld theory is the framework in which the regnant theories of the electroweak and strong interactions, which together form the Standard Mo del, are formulated. Quantum electro dynamics (QED), b esides providing a com- plete foundation for atomic physics and chemistry, has supp orted calculations of physical quantities with unparalleled precision. The exp erimentally measured value of the magnetic dip ole moment of the muon, 11 (g 2) = 233 184 600 (1680) 10 ; (1) exp: for example, should b e compared with the theoretical prediction 11 (g 2) = 233 183 478 (308) 10 : (2) theor: In quantum chromo dynamics (QCD) we cannot, for the forseeable future, aspire to to comparable accuracy.Yet QCD provides di erent, and at least equally impressive, evidence for the validity of the basic principles of quantum eld theory. Indeed, b ecause in QCD the interactions are stronger, QCD manifests a wider variety of phenomena characteristic of quantum eld theory. These include esp ecially running of the e ective coupling with distance or energy scale and the phenomenon of con nement.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Field Theories, Reductionism and Scientific Explanation Stephan
    To appear in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Effective Field Theories, Reductionism and Scientific Explanation Stephan Hartmann∗ Abstract Effective field theories have been a very popular tool in quantum physics for almost two decades. And there are good reasons for this. I will argue that effec- tive field theories share many of the advantages of both fundamental theories and phenomenological models, while avoiding their respective shortcomings. They are, for example, flexible enough to cover a wide range of phenomena, and concrete enough to provide a detailed story of the specific mechanisms at work at a given energy scale. So will all of physics eventually converge on effective field theories? This paper argues that good scientific research can be characterised by a fruitful interaction between fundamental theories, phenomenological models and effective field theories. All of them have their appropriate functions in the research process, and all of them are indispens- able. They complement each other and hang together in a coherent way which I shall characterise in some detail. To illustrate all this I will present a case study from nuclear and particle physics. The resulting view about scientific theorising is inherently pluralistic, and has implications for the debates about reductionism and scientific explanation. Keywords: Effective Field Theory; Quantum Field Theory; Renormalisation; Reductionism; Explanation; Pluralism. ∗Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, 817 Cathedral of Learning, Pitts- burgh, PA 15260, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) (correspondence address); and Sektion Physik, Universit¨at M¨unchen, Theresienstr. 37, 80333 M¨unchen, Germany. 1 1 Introduction There is little doubt that effective field theories are nowadays a very popular tool in quantum physics.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Electroweak Model and Constraints on New Physics
    1 10. Electroweak Model and Constraints on New Physics 10. Electroweak Model and Constraints on New Physics Revised March 2020 by J. Erler (IF-UNAM; U. of Mainz) and A. Freitas (Pittsburg U.). 10.1 Introduction ....................................... 1 10.2 Renormalization and radiative corrections....................... 3 10.2.1 The Fermi constant ................................ 3 10.2.2 The electromagnetic coupling........................... 3 10.2.3 Quark masses.................................... 5 10.2.4 The weak mixing angle .............................. 6 10.2.5 Radiative corrections................................ 8 10.3 Low energy electroweak observables .......................... 9 10.3.1 Neutrino scattering................................. 9 10.3.2 Parity violating lepton scattering......................... 12 10.3.3 Atomic parity violation .............................. 13 10.4 Precision flavor physics ................................. 15 10.4.1 The τ lifetime.................................... 15 10.4.2 The muon anomalous magnetic moment..................... 17 10.5 Physics of the massive electroweak bosons....................... 18 10.5.1 Electroweak physics off the Z pole........................ 19 10.5.2 Z pole physics ................................... 21 10.5.3 W and Z decays .................................. 25 10.6 Global fit results..................................... 26 10.7 Constraints on new physics............................... 30 10.1 Introduction The standard model of the electroweak interactions (SM) [1–4] is based on the gauge group i SU(2)×U(1), with gauge bosons Wµ, i = 1, 2, 3, and Bµ for the SU(2) and U(1) factors, respectively, and the corresponding gauge coupling constants g and g0. The left-handed fermion fields of the th νi ui 0 P i fermion family transform as doublets Ψi = − and d0 under SU(2), where d ≡ Vij dj, `i i i j and V is the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa mixing [5,6] matrix1.
    [Show full text]
  • Basics of Thermal Field Theory
    September 2021 Basics of Thermal Field Theory A Tutorial on Perturbative Computations 1 Mikko Lainea and Aleksi Vuorinenb aAEC, Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland bDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Abstract These lecture notes, suitable for a two-semester introductory course or self-study, offer an elemen- tary and self-contained exposition of the basic tools and concepts that are encountered in practical computations in perturbative thermal field theory. Selected applications to heavy ion collision physics and cosmology are outlined in the last chapter. 1An earlier version of these notes is available as an ebook (Springer Lecture Notes in Physics 925) at dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9; a citable eprint can be found at arxiv.org/abs/1701.01554; the very latest version is kept up to date at www.laine.itp.unibe.ch/basics.pdf. Contents Foreword ........................................... i Notation............................................ ii Generaloutline....................................... iii 1 Quantummechanics ................................... 1 1.1 Path integral representation of the partition function . ....... 1 1.2 Evaluation of the path integral for the harmonic oscillator . ..... 6 2 Freescalarfields ..................................... 13 2.1 Path integral for the partition function . ... 13 2.2 Evaluation of thermal sums and their low-temperature limit . .... 16 2.3 High-temperatureexpansion. 23 3 Interactingscalarfields............................... ... 30 3.1 Principles of the weak-coupling expansion . 30 3.2 Problems of the naive weak-coupling expansion . .. 38 3.3 Proper free energy density to (λ): ultraviolet renormalization . 40 O 3 3.4 Proper free energy density to (λ 2 ): infraredresummation .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1407.4336V2 [Hep-Ph] 10 May 2016 I.Laigtrelo Orcin Otehgsmass Higgs the to Corrections Three-Loop Leading III
    Higgs boson mass in the Standard Model at two-loop order and beyond Stephen P. Martin1,2 and David G. Robertson3 1Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb IL 60115 2Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia IL 60510 3Department of Physics, Otterbein University, Westerville OH 43081 We calculate the mass of the Higgs boson in the Standard Model in terms of the underlying Lagrangian parameters at complete 2-loop order with leading 3-loop corrections. A computer program implementing the results is provided. The program also computes and minimizes the Standard Model effective po- tential in Landau gauge at 2-loop order with leading 3-loop corrections. Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Higgs pole mass at 2-loop order 2 III. Leading three-loop corrections to the Higgs mass 11 IV. Computer code implementation and numerical results 13 V. Outlook 19 arXiv:1407.4336v2 [hep-ph] 10 May 2016 Appendix: Some loop integral identities 20 References 22 I. INTRODUCTION The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has discovered [1] a Higgs scalar boson h with mass Mh near 125.5 GeV [2] and properties consistent with the predictions of the minimal Standard Model. At the present time, there are no signals or hints of other new elementary particles. In the case of supersymmetry, the limits on strongly interacting superpartners are model dependent, but typically extend to over an order of magnitude above Mh. It is therefore quite possible, if not likely, that the Standard Model with a minimal Higgs sector exists 2 as an effective theory below 1 TeV, with all other fundamental physics decoupled from it to a very good approximation.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Limits of Effective Quantum Field Theory
    RUNHETC-2019-15 On the Limits of Effective Quantum Field Theory: Eternal Inflation, Landscapes, and Other Mythical Beasts Tom Banks Department of Physics and NHETC Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We recapitulate multiple arguments that Eternal Inflation and the String Landscape are actually part of the Swampland: ideas in Effective Quantum Field Theory that do not have a counterpart in genuine models of Quantum Gravity. 1 Introduction Most of the arguments and results in this paper are old, dating back a decade, and very little of what is written here has not been published previously, or presented in talks. I was motivated to write this note after spending two weeks at the Vacuum Energy and Electroweak Scale workshop at KITP in Santa Barbara. There I found a whole new generation of effective field theorists recycling tired ideas from the 1980s about the use of effective field theory in gravitational contexts. These were ideas that I once believed in, but since the beginning of the 21st century my work in string theory and the dynamics of black holes, convinced me that they arXiv:1910.12817v2 [hep-th] 6 Nov 2019 were wrong. I wrote and lectured about this extensively in the first decade of the century, but apparently those arguments have not been accepted, and effective field theorists have concluded that the main lesson from string theory is that there is a vast landscape of meta-stable states in the theory of quantum gravity, connected by tunneling transitions in the manner envisioned by effective field theorists in the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Renormalization and Effective Field Theory
    Mathematical Surveys and Monographs Volume 170 Renormalization and Effective Field Theory Kevin Costello American Mathematical Society surv-170-costello-cov.indd 1 1/28/11 8:15 AM http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/170 Renormalization and Effective Field Theory Mathematical Surveys and Monographs Volume 170 Renormalization and Effective Field Theory Kevin Costello American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Ralph L. Cohen, Chair MichaelA.Singer Eric M. Friedlander Benjamin Sudakov MichaelI.Weinstein 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 81T13, 81T15, 81T17, 81T18, 81T20, 81T70. The author was partially supported by NSF grant 0706954 and an Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/surv-170 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Costello, Kevin. Renormalization and effective fieldtheory/KevinCostello. p. cm. — (Mathematical surveys and monographs ; v. 170) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-8218-5288-0 (alk. paper) 1. Renormalization (Physics) 2. Quantum field theory. I. Title. QC174.17.R46C67 2011 530.143—dc22 2010047463 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy a chapter for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Requests for such permission should be addressed to the Acquisitions Department, American Mathematical Society, 201 Charles Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02904-2294 USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of Effective Field Theory Techniques to Jet Physics by Simon
    Applications of Effective Field Theory Techniques to Jet Physics by Simon M. Freedman A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Physics University of Toronto c Copyright 2015 by Simon M. Freedman Abstract Applications of Effective Field Theory Techniques to Jet Physics Simon M. Freedman Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Physics University of Toronto 2015 In this thesis we study jet production at large energies from leptonic collisions. We use the framework of effective theories of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) to examine the properties of jets and systematically improve calculations. We first develop a new formulation of soft-collinear effective theory (SCET), the appropriate effective theory for jets. In this formulation, soft and collinear degrees of freedom are described using QCD fields that interact with each other through light-like Wilson lines in external cur- rents. This formulation gives a more intuitive picture of jet processes than the traditional formulation of SCET. In particular, we show how the decoupling of soft and collinear degrees of freedom that occurs at leading order in power counting is explicit to next-to-leading order and likely beyond. We then use this formulation to write the thrust rate in a factorized form at next-to-leading order in the thrust parameter. The rate involves an incomplete sum over final states due to phase space cuts that is enforced by a measurement operator. Subleading corrections require matching onto not only the next-to-next-to leading order SCET operators, but also matching onto subleading measurement operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Relation Between the Pole and the Minimally Subtracted Mass in Dimensional Regularization and Dimensional Reduction to Three-Loop Order
    SFB/CPP-07-04 TTP07-04 DESY07-016 hep-ph/0702185 Relation between the pole and the minimally subtracted mass in dimensional regularization and dimensional reduction to three-loop order P. Marquard(a), L. Mihaila(a), J.H. Piclum(a,b) and M. Steinhauser(a) (a) Institut f¨ur Theoretische Teilchenphysik, Universit¨at Karlsruhe (TH) 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany (b) II. Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik, Universit¨at Hamburg 22761 Hamburg, Germany Abstract We compute the relation between the pole quark mass and the minimally sub- tracted quark mass in the framework of QCD applying dimensional reduction as a regularization scheme. Special emphasis is put on the evanescent couplings and the renormalization of the ε-scalar mass. As a by-product we obtain the three-loop ZOS ZOS on-shell renormalization constants m and 2 in dimensional regularization and thus provide the first independent check of the analytical results computed several years ago. arXiv:hep-ph/0702185v1 19 Feb 2007 PACS numbers: 12.38.-t 14.65.-q 14.65.Fy 14.65.Ha 1 Introduction In quantum chromodynamics (QCD), like in any other renormalizeable quantum field theory, it is crucial to specify the precise meaning of the parameters appearing in the underlying Lagrangian — in particular when higher order quantum corrections are con- sidered. The canonical choice for the coupling constant of QCD, αs, is the so-called modified minimal subtraction (MS) scheme [1] which has the advantage that the beta function, ruling the scale dependence of the coupling, is mass-independent. On the other hand, for a heavy quark besides the MS scheme also other definitions are important — first and foremost the pole mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Quark Mass Renormalization in the MS and RI Schemes up To
    ROME1-1198/98 Quark Mass Renormalization in the MS and RI schemes up to the NNLO order Enrico Francoa and Vittorio Lubiczb a Dip. di Fisica, Universit`adegli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza” and INFN, Sezione di Roma, P.le A. Moro 2, 00185 Roma, Italy. b Dip. di Fisica, Universit`adi Roma Tre and INFN, Sezione di Roma, Via della Vasca Navale 84, I-00146 Roma, Italy Abstract We compute the relation between the quark mass defined in the min- imal modified MS scheme and the mass defined in the “Regularization Invariant” scheme (RI), up to the NNLO order. The RI scheme is conve- niently adopted in lattice QCD calculations of the quark mass, since the relevant renormalization constants in this scheme can be evaluated in a non-perturbative way. The NNLO contribution to the conversion factor between the quark mass in the two schemes is found to be large, typically of the same order of the NLO correction at a scale µ ∼ 2 GeV. We also give the NNLO relation between the quark mass in the RI scheme and the arXiv:hep-ph/9803491v1 30 Mar 1998 renormalization group-invariant mass. 1 Introduction The values of quark masses are of great importance in the phenomenology of the Standard Model and beyond. For instance, bottom and charm quark masses enter significantly in the theoretical expressions of inclusive decay rates of heavy mesons, while the strange quark mass plays a crucial role in the evaluation of the K → ππ, ∆I = 1/2, decay amplitude and of the CP-violation parameter ǫ′/ǫ.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Effective Field Theories
    Adam Falkowski Lectures on Effective Field Theories Version of September 21, 2020 Abstract Effective field theories (EFTs) are widely used in particle physics and well beyond. The basic idea is to approximate a physical system by integrating out the degrees of freedom that are not relevant in a given experimental setting. These are traded for a set of effective interactions between the remaining degrees of freedom. In these lectures I review the concept, techniques, and applications of the EFT framework. The 1st lecture gives an overview of the EFT landscape. I will review the philosophy, basic techniques, and applications of EFTs. A few prominent examples, such as the Fermi theory, the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, and the SMEFT, are presented to illustrate some salient features of the EFT. In the 2nd lecture I discuss quantitatively the procedure of integrating out heavy particles in a quantum field theory. An explicit example of the tree- and one-loop level matching between an EFT and its UV completion will be discussed in all gory details. The 3rd lecture is devoted to path integral methods of calculating effective Lagrangians. Finally, in the 4th lecture I discuss the EFT approach to constraining new physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). To this end, the so- called SM EFT is introduced, where the SM Lagrangian is extended by a set of non- renormalizable interactions representing the effects of new heavy particles. 1 Contents 1 Illustrated philosophy of EFT3 1.1 Introduction..................................3 1.2 Scaling and power counting.........................6 1.3 Illustration #1: Fermi theory........................8 1.4 Illustration #2: Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian..............
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Gravity, Effective Fields and String Theory
    Quantum gravity, effective fields and string theory Niels Emil Jannik Bjerrum-Bohr The Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen arXiv:hep-th/0410097v1 10 Oct 2004 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics at the Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. 28th July 2 Abstract In this thesis we will look into some of the various aspects of treating general relativity as a quantum theory. The thesis falls in three parts. First we briefly study how gen- eral relativity can be consistently quantized as an effective field theory, and we focus on the concrete results of such a treatment. As a key achievement of the investigations we present our calculations of the long-range low-energy leading quantum corrections to both the Schwarzschild and Kerr metrics. The leading quantum corrections to the pure gravitational potential between two sources are also calculated, both in the mixed theory of scalar QED and quantum gravity and in the pure gravitational theory. Another part of the thesis deals with the (Kawai-Lewellen-Tye) string theory gauge/gravity relations. Both theories are treated as effective field theories, and we investigate if the KLT oper- ator mapping is extendable to the case of higher derivative operators. The constraints, imposed by the KLT-mapping on the effective coupling constants, are also investigated. The KLT relations are generalized, taking the effective field theory viewpoint, and it is noticed that some remarkable tree-level amplitude relations exist between the field the- ory operators. Finally we look at effective quantum gravity treated from the perspective of taking the limit of infinitely many spatial dimensions.
    [Show full text]