Analytic Computation of Digamma Function Using Some New Identities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analytic Computation of Digamma Function Using Some New Identities JAMSI, 16 (2020), No. 1 5 Analytic computation of digamma function using some new identities M. I. QURESHI AND M. SHADAB Abstract Motivated by the substantial development in the theory of digamma function, we derive some new identities for the digamma function. These new identities enable us to compute the values of the digamma function for fractional orders in an analogous manner. Also, we mention two errata, found in Jensen’s article (An elementary exposition of the theory of the Gamma function, 1916), and present their correct forms. Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 33B15, 11Y60, 11Y35. Keywords:Digamma(Psi) function; Gamma function; Euler’s constant. 1. INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARIES A natural property of digamma (Psi)function is as application in the theory of beta distributions-probability models for the domain [0,1]. It is used mainly in the theory of special functions in wide range of applications. Digamma functions are directly connected with many special functions such as Riemann’s zeta function and Clausen’s function etc. Many authors have contributed to develop the theory of polygamma function with respect to properties [25; 9; 13; 14; 16], inequalities [2; 3; 6], monotonicity [21; 22; 23; 24], series [5; 7; 15; 27; 10; 12], and fractional calculus [1; 19; 20]. The Gamma function, G(x), was introduced by Leonard Euler as a generalization of the factorial function on the sets, R of all real numbers, and C of all complex numbers. It (or, Euler’s integral of second kind) is defined by Z ¥ G(z) = exp(−t)tz−1dt; Â(z) > 0 0 Z n t n = lim 1 − tz−1dt: (1.1) n!¥ 0 n 10.2478/jamsi-2020-0001 c University of SS. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava 6 M. I. Qureshi and M. Shadab In 1856, Karl Weierstrass gave a novel definition of gamma function 1 ¥ h z z i = zexp(gz)∏ 1 + exp − ; (1.2) G(z) n=1 n n where g = 0:577215664901532860606512090082402431042:::, is called 1 Euler-Mascheroni constant, and G(z) is an entire function of z, and 1 1 1 g = lim 1 + + + ::::: + − `n(n) : n!¥ 2 3 n The function d G0(z) y(z) = f`nG(z)g = ; (1.3) dz G(z) or, equivalently Z z `nG(z) = y(z)dz; (1.4) 1 is the logarithmic derivative of the gamma function or digamma function. y (i)(z) for i 2 N are called the polygamma functions, and y has the presentation as G0(z) Z ¥ e−t − e−zt (z) = = − + dt ( = ): y g −t g Euler’s constant (1.5) G(z) 0 1 − e The Psi function has following series representation 1 ¥ z y(z) = −g − + ∑ ; z 6= −1;−2;−3;::: (1.6) z n=1 n(z + n) In 1813, Gauss [9] (see also, Jensen [13, p.146, eq.(32)]; [8, p.19, (1.7.3) eq.(29)], Bohmer¨ [4, p.77] ) discovered an interesting formula for digamma (Psi) function as follows [ q ] p p p 2 2p jp 2p j y(p=q) = −g − `n(q) − cot + ∑ 0 cos `n 2 − 2cos ; (1.7) 2 q j=1 q q where 1 ≤ p < q and p;q are positive integers, and accent(prime) to right of the q summation sign indicates the term corresponding to (last term) j = 2 (when q is positive even integer) should be divided by 2. A different form of Gauss formula is also given in N. Nielsen [18, p. 22, an equation between equations (7) and (8)] as follows p p p q−1 2p p j p j y(p=q) = −g − `n(q) − cot + ∑ cos `n 2sin ; (1.8) 2 q j=1 q q JAMSI, 16 (2020), No. 1 7 where 1 ≤ p < q and p;q are positive integers. Afterwards, in 2007, an attempt was made by Murty and Saradha [17, p. 300, after eq.(4)] (see also, Lehmer [14, p. 135, after eq.(20)]) for the simplification of the above Gauss formula (1.7) as follows [ q ] p p p 2 2p p j p j y(p=q) = −g − `n(2q) − cot + 2 ∑ cos `nsin ; (1.9) 2 q j=1 q q where p = 1;2;3;:::;(q − 1); q = 2;3;4;:::;(p;q) = 1. Also, we have verified the results (1.7), (1.8) and (1.9) by taking different values of p and q. Gradshteyn and Ryzhik [11, p. 904, eq 8.363(6)] recorded an erroneous formula for digamma function such that [ q+1 ]−1 p p p 2 2p p j p j y(p=q) $ −g − `n(2q) − cot + 2 ∑ cos `nsin ; (1.10) 2 q j=1 q q where p = 1;2;3;:::;(q − 1); q = 2;3;4;:::;(p;q) = 1 and the symbol $ exhibits the fact that equation (1.10) does not hold true as stated. Some important facts, which appreciate us to work in this direction, are as follows p —We cannot compute the value of digamma function when p > q or ( and ) q is negative fraction using Gauss formula [9]. —We cannot compute the value of digamma function when p > q using Jensen formula [13]. p —We cannot compute the value of digamma function when q is negative using Jensen [13]. —Murty and Saradha [17, p. 300] corrected a formula of Lehmer [14, p. 135] for p y( q ) —Some specific values of digamma function were proved transcendental by Murty and Saradha [17]. 2. SOME NEW IDENTITIES FOR DIGAMMA FUNCTION Some functional relations for digamma function, that are easily derivable from the properties of the gamma function, are recalled here. Indeed, from the formula 8 M. I. Qureshi and M. Shadab p G(z + 1) = zG(z); G(z)G(1 − z) = ; z 6= 0;±1;±2;±3;::: (2.1) sin(pz) taking `n both sides and differentiating the above equation with respect to z, we derive the some basic identities for digamma function as follows 1 y(z + 1) = y(z) + ; y(1 − z) = y(z) + p cot(pz); z 6= 0;±1;±2;±3;::: (2.2) z 1 1 1 y(z + n) = + + ··· + + y(z): (2.3) z z + 1 z + n − 1 On setting z = (1 − z) in equation (2.2), we get 1 y(−z) = + y(1 − z): (2.4) z On comparing the values of y(1 − z) from the equations (2.2) and (2.4), we get a new identity 1 y(z) + p cot(pz) = y(−z) − : (2.5) z p By setting z = q , 1 ≤ p < q in equations (2.2) and (2.4), we get more identities. These identities, enable us to derive our main identities, are as follows p + q q p −p q q − p y = + y ; and y = + y ; 1 ≤ p < q: (2.6) q p q q p q For the sake of convenient computation of digamma function, we derive some more identities, which are simple but more applicable in the computation of digamma p function for q > 1. For this concern, we connect the Murty and Saradha’s formula for digamma function (1.11) with our above identity (2.6) and get the result as follows [ q ] q − p p p p 2 2p p j p j y = −g − `n(2q) + cot + 2 ∑ cos `nsin ; (2.7) q 2 q j=1 q q (p;q) = 1; 1 ≤ p < q. Now, we derive the identity for computation of the digamma p function for negative fractions − q . For this motive, we derive the identity in the similar manner as used in the above identity and get the result as follows [ q ] −p q p p(q − p) 2 2p(q − p) j p j y = − g − `n(2q) − cot + 2 ∑ cos `nsin ; q p 2 q j=1 q q (2.8) 1 ≤ p < q. JAMSI, 16 (2020), No. 1 9 3. NUMERIC COMPUTATIONS OF DIGAMMA FUNCTION Table I. y- Function(Fractional Valued, p > q ) 0 p G (z) Ser. No. z = q y(z) = pG(z) 7 15 p 3 3 1 3 −g + 4 − 6 − 2 `n3 3 2 2 −g + 2 − 2`n2 5 8 3 2 −g + 3 − 2`n2 Table II. y- Function(Positive fractional Order) 0 p G (z) Ser. No. z = q y(z) = G(z) 1 1 −g − 2`n2 2 p 1 3p 3 2 3 −g − 6 − 2 `n3 1 p 3 4 −g − 2 − 3`n2 p p p p 1 1+ 5 1 5−1 5 4 −g − `n10 − p p p + f 5`n − `n g 5 (10−2 5) 2 2 2 4 p p 1 p 3 5 6 −g − `n12 − 2 − `n 3 p p p 1 (1+ 2)p 6 8 −g − 2 − 4`n2 − 2`n(1 + 2) p p ( + ) p p p 7 1 −g − `n20 − p10 2 5 p + 1 f 5`n( 5 − 2) − `n 5g 10 − 2 2 5 p1 p p p 8 1 −g − `n24 − 2 + 3 p + f 3`n(2 − 3) − `n 3g 12 2p 2 3p 3 9 3 −g + 6 − 2 `n3 p p p p 2 5−1 1 5+1 5 10 −g − `n10 − p p p + f 5`n − `n g 5 (10+2 5) 2 2 2 4 3 p 11 4 −g + 2 − 3`n2 p p p p 3 5−1 1 5+1 5 12 −g − `n10 + p p p + f 5`n − `n g 5 (10+2 5) 2 2 2 4 p p p 3 ( 2−1)p 13 8 −g − 2 − 4`n2 + 2`n(1 + 2) p p ( − ) p p p 14 3 −g − `n20 − 10 p2 5 p + 1 f 5`n(2 + 5) − `n 5g 10 1+ 5 2 2 p p p p 4 1+ 5 1 5−1 5 15 −g − `n10 + p p p + f 5`n − `n g 5 (10−2 5) 2 2 2 4 p p 5 p 3 16 6 −g − `n12 + 2 − `n 3 p p p 17 5 −g + ( 2−1)p − 4`n2 + 2`n(1 + 2) 8 2 p p p p 5 p 18 12 −g − `n24 − 2 − 3 2 + f 3`n(2 + 3) − `n 3g p p p 7 (1+ 2)p 19 8 −g + 2 − 4`n2 − 2`n(1 + 2) p p ( − ) p p p 20 7 −g − `n20 + 10 p2 5 p + 1 f 5`n(2 + 5) − `n 5g 10 + 2 2 1 p5 p p p 7 p 21 12 −g − `n24 + 2 − 3 2 + f 3`n(2 + 3) − `n 3g p p ( + ) p p p 22 9 −g − `n20 + p10 2 5 p + 1 f 5`n( 5 − 2) − `n 5g 10 − 2 2 5 p1 p p p 11 p 23 12 −g − `n24 + 2 + 3 2 + f 3`n(2 − 3) − `n 3g 10 M.
Recommended publications
  • The Digamma Function and Explicit Permutations of the Alternating Harmonic Series
    The digamma function and explicit permutations of the alternating harmonic series. Maxim Gilula February 20, 2015 Abstract The main goal is to present a countable family of permutations of the natural numbers that provide explicit rearrangements of the alternating harmonic series and that we can easily define by some closed expression. The digamma function presents its ubiquity in mathematics once more by being the key tool in computing explicitly the simple rearrangements presented in this paper. The permutations are simple in the sense that composing one with itself will give the identity. We show that the count- able set of rearrangements presented are dense in the reals. Then, slight generalizations are presented. Finally, we reprove a result given originally by J.H. Smith in 1975 that for any conditionally convergent real series guarantees permutations of infinite cycle type give all rearrangements of the series [4]. This result provides a refinement of the well known theorem by Riemann (see e.g. Rudin [3] Theorem 3.54). 1 Introduction A permutation of order n of a conditionally convergent series is a bijection φ of the positive integers N with the property that φn = φ ◦ · · · ◦ φ is the identity on N and n is the least such. Given a conditionally convergent series, a nat- ural question to ask is whether for any real number L there is a permutation of order 2 (or n > 1) such that the rearrangement induced by the permutation equals L. This turns out to be an easy corollary of [4], and is reproved below with elementary methods. Other \simple"rearrangements have been considered elsewhere, such as in Stout [5] and the comprehensive references therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Numbers 05/10/2006 12:02 PM
    Greek numbers 05/10/2006 12:02 PM History topic: Greek number systems There were no single Greek national standards in the first millennium BC. since the various island states prided themselves on their independence. This meant that they each had their own currency, weights and measures etc. These in turn led to small differences in the number system between different states since a major function of a number system in ancient times was to handle business transactions. However we will not go into sufficient detail in this article to examine the small differences between the system in separate states but rather we will look at its general structure. We should say immediately that the ancient Greeks had different systems for cardinal numbers and ordinal numbers so we must look carefully at what we mean by Greek number systems. Also we shall look briefly at some systems proposed by various Greek mathematicians but not widely adopted. The first Greek number system we examine is their acrophonic system which was use in the first millennium BC. 'Acrophonic' means that the symbols for the numerals come from the first letter of the number name, so the symbol has come from an abreviation of the word which is used for the number. Here are the symbols for the numbers 5, 10, 100, 1000, 10000. Acrophonic 5, 10, 100, 1000, 10000. We have omitted the symbol for 'one', a simple '|', which was an obvious notation not coming from the initial letter of a number. For 5, 10, 100, 1000, 10000 there will be only one puzzle for the reader and that is the symbol for 5 which should by P if it was the first letter of Pente.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riemann and Hurwitz Zeta Functions, Apery's Constant and New
    The Riemann and Hurwitz zeta functions, Apery’s constant and new rational series representations involving ζ(2k) Cezar Lupu1 1Department of Mathematics University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA Algebra, Combinatorics and Geometry Graduate Student Research Seminar, February 2, 2017, Pittsburgh, PA A quick overview of the Riemann zeta function. The Riemann zeta function is defined by 1 X 1 ζ(s) = ; Re s > 1: ns n=1 Originally, Riemann zeta function was defined for real arguments. Also, Euler found another formula which relates the Riemann zeta function with prime numbrs, namely Y 1 ζ(s) = ; 1 p 1 − ps where p runs through all primes p = 2; 3; 5;:::. A quick overview of the Riemann zeta function. Moreover, Riemann proved that the following ζ(s) satisfies the following integral representation formula: 1 Z 1 us−1 ζ(s) = u du; Re s > 1; Γ(s) 0 e − 1 Z 1 where Γ(s) = ts−1e−t dt, Re s > 0 is the Euler gamma 0 function. Also, another important fact is that one can extend ζ(s) from Re s > 1 to Re s > 0. By an easy computation one has 1 X 1 (1 − 21−s )ζ(s) = (−1)n−1 ; ns n=1 and therefore we have A quick overview of the Riemann function. 1 1 X 1 ζ(s) = (−1)n−1 ; Re s > 0; s 6= 1: 1 − 21−s ns n=1 It is well-known that ζ is analytic and it has an analytic continuation at s = 1. At s = 1 it has a simple pole with residue 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Gamma in Place of Digamma in Ancient Greek
    Mnemosyne (2020) 1-22 brill.com/mnem The Use of Gamma in Place of Digamma in Ancient Greek Francesco Camagni University of Manchester, UK [email protected] Received August 2019 | Accepted March 2020 Abstract Originally, Ancient Greek employed the letter digamma ( ϝ) to represent the /w/ sound. Over time, this sound disappeared, alongside the digamma that denoted it. However, to transcribe those archaic, dialectal, or foreign words that still retained this sound, lexicographers employed other letters, whose sound was close enough to /w/. Among these, there is the letter gamma (γ), attested mostly but not only in the Lexicon of Hesychius. Given what we know about the sound of gamma, it is difficult to explain this use. The most straightforward hypothesis suggests that the scribes who copied these words misread the capital digamma (Ϝ) as gamma (Γ). Presenting new and old evidence of gamma used to denote digamma in Ancient Greek literary and documen- tary papyri, lexicography, and medieval manuscripts, this paper refutes this hypoth- esis, and demonstrates that a peculiar evolution in the pronunciation of gamma in Post-Classical Greek triggered a systematic use of this letter to denote the sound once represented by the digamma. Keywords Ancient Greek language – gamma – digamma – Greek phonetics – Hesychius – lexicography © Francesco Camagni, 2020 | doi:10.1163/1568525X-bja10018 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded license. from Brill.com09/30/2021 01:54:17PM via free access 2 Camagni 1 Introduction It is well known that many ancient Greek dialects preserved the /w/ sound into the historical period, contrary to Attic-Ionic and Koine Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Fundamentals to Resist Ethnic Calamities and Maintain National Integrity
    Scholarship Report – L. Picha Meiji Jingu & Shiseikan In Search of fundamentals to resist ethnic calamities and maintain national integrity Lefkothea Picha June-July 2013 1 Scholarship Report Meiji Jingu (明治神宮) & Shiseikan (至誠館) Contents Acknowledgements and impressions …………………………………… Page 3 a. Cultural trip at Izumo Taishia and Matsue city Introduction: Japan’s latest Tsunami versus Greek financial crisis reflecting national ethos…………………............................................................................ 6 Part 1 The Historic Horizon in Greece................................................... 7 a. Classical Period b. Persian wars c. Alexander’s the Great Empire d. Roman and Medieval Greece e. The Byzantine Period f. The Ottoman domination g. Commentary on the Byzantine epoch and Ottoman occupation h. World War II i. Greece after World War II j. Restoration of Democracy and Greek Politics in the era of Financial crisis Part 2 The liturgical and spiritual Greek ethos …………………………. 10 a. Greek mythology, the ancient Greek philosophy and Shinto b. Orthodox theology, Christian ethics and Shinto c. Purification process – Katharmos in ancient Greece, Christian Baptism and Misogi Part 3 Greek warriors’ ethos and Reflections on Bushido ..................... 14 a. Battle of Thermopylae (480 BC) b. Ancient Greek warriors armor c. Comparison of Spartan soldiers and Samurai d. The motto “freedom or death and the Greek anthem e. Monument of the unknown soldier and Yasukunii shrine f. Women warriors and their supportive role against invaders g. Reflections on Bushido and its importance in the modern era h. Personal training in Budo and relation with Shiseikan Part 4 Personal view on Greek nation’s metamorphosis………………… 20 a. From the illustrious ancestors to the cultural decay. Is catastrophy a chance to revive Greek nation? Lefkothea Picha 2 Scholarship Report Meiji Jingu (明治神宮) & Shiseikan (至誠館) Acknowledgments and impressions I would like to thank Araya Kancho for the scholarship received.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLETE MONOTONICITY for a NEW RATIO of FINITE MANY GAMMA FUNCTIONS Feng Qi
    COMPLETE MONOTONICITY FOR A NEW RATIO OF FINITE MANY GAMMA FUNCTIONS Feng Qi To cite this version: Feng Qi. COMPLETE MONOTONICITY FOR A NEW RATIO OF FINITE MANY GAMMA FUNCTIONS. 2020. hal-02511909 HAL Id: hal-02511909 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02511909 Preprint submitted on 19 Mar 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. COMPLETE MONOTONICITY FOR A NEW RATIO OF FINITE MANY GAMMA FUNCTIONS FENG QI Dedicated to people facing and fighting COVID-19 Abstract. In the paper, by deriving an inequality involving the generating function of the Bernoulli numbers, the author introduces a new ratio of finite many gamma functions, finds complete monotonicity of the second logarithmic derivative of the ratio, and simply reviews complete monotonicity of several linear combinations of finite many digamma or trigamma functions. Contents 1. Preliminaries and motivations 1 2. A lemma 3 3. Complete monotonicity 4 4. A simple review 5 References 7 1. Preliminaries and motivations Let f(x) be an infinite differentiable function on (0; 1). If (−1)kf (k)(x) ≥ 0 for all k ≥ 0 and x 2 (0; 1), then we call f(x) a completely monotonic function on (0; 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Two Series Expansions for the Logarithm of the Gamma Function Involving Stirling Numbers and Containing Only Rational −1 Coefficients for Certain Arguments Related to Π
    J. Math. Anal. Appl. 442 (2016) 404–434 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Two series expansions for the logarithm of the gamma function involving Stirling numbers and containing only rational −1 coefficients for certain arguments related to π Iaroslav V. Blagouchine ∗ University of Toulon, France a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: In this paper, two new series for the logarithm of the Γ-function are presented and Received 10 September 2015 studied. Their polygamma analogs are also obtained and discussed. These series Available online 21 April 2016 involve the Stirling numbers of the first kind and have the property to contain only Submitted by S. Tikhonov − rational coefficients for certain arguments related to π 1. In particular, for any value of the form ln Γ( 1 n ± απ−1)andΨ ( 1 n ± απ−1), where Ψ stands for the Keywords: 2 k 2 k 1 Gamma function kth polygamma function, α is positive rational greater than 6 π, n is integer and k Polygamma functions is non-negative integer, these series have rational terms only. In the specified zones m −2 Stirling numbers of convergence, derived series converge uniformly at the same rate as (n ln n) , Factorial coefficients where m =1, 2, 3, ..., depending on the order of the polygamma function. Explicit Gregory’s coefficients expansions into the series with rational coefficients are given for the most attracting Cauchy numbers −1 −1 1 −1 −1 1 −1 values, such as ln Γ(π ), ln Γ(2π ), ln Γ( 2 + π ), Ψ(π ), Ψ( 2 + π )and −1 Ψk(π ).
    [Show full text]
  • Euler-Maclaurin and Euler-Boole Formulas
    Appendix A Euler-MacLaurin and Euler-Boole Formulas A.1 A Taylor Formula The classical Taylor formula Z Xm xk x .x t/m f .x/ D @kf .0/ C @mC1f .t/dt kŠ 0 mŠ kD0 xk can be generalized if we replace the polynomial kŠ by other polynomials (Viskov 1988; Bourbaki 1959). Definition If is a linear form on C0.R/ such that .1/ D 1,wedefinethe polynomials .Pn/ by: P0 D 1 @Pn D Pn1 , .Pn/ D 0 for n 1 P . / k The Generating Function k0 Pk x z We have formally X X X k k k @x. Pk.x/z / D Pk1.x/z D z. Pk.x/z / k0 k1 k0 © Springer International Publishing AG 2017 175 B. Candelpergher, Ramanujan Summation of Divergent Series, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2185, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63630-6 176 A Euler-MacLaurin and Euler-Boole Formulas thus X k xz Pk.x/z D C.z/e k0 To evaluate C.z/ we use the notation x for and by definition of .Pn/ we can write X X k k x. Pk.x/z / D x.Pk.x//z D 1 k0 k0 X k xz xz x. Pk.x/z / D x.C.z/e / D C.z/x.e / k0 1 this gives C.z/ D xz . Thus the generating function of the sequence .Pn/ is x.e / X n xz Pn.x/z D e =M.z/ n xz where the function M is defined by M.z/ D x.e /: Examples P xn n xz .
    [Show full text]
  • Task Force for the Review of the Romanization of Greek RE: Report of the Task Force
    CC:DA/TF/ Review of the Romanization of Greek/3 Report, May 18, 2010 page: 1 TO: ALA/ALCTS/CCS/Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access (CC:DA) FROM: ALA/ALCTS/CCS/CC:DA Task Force for the Review of the Romanization of Greek RE: Report of the Task Force CHARGE TO THE TASK FORCE The Task Force is charged with assessing draft Romanization tables for Greek, educating CC:DA as necessary, and preparing necessary reports to support the revision process, leading to ultimate approval of an updated ALA-LC Romanization scheme for Greek. In particular, the Task Force should review the May 2010 draft for a timely report by ALA to LC. Review of subsequent tables may be called for, depending on the viability of this latest draft. The ALA-LC Romanization table - Greek, Proposed Revision May 2010 is located at the LC Policy and Standards Division website at: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/romanization/greekrev.pdf [archived as a supplement to this report on the CC:DA site] BACKGROUND INFORMATION FROM THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS We note that when the May 2010 Greek table was presented for general review via email, the LC Policy and Standards Division offered the following information comparing the May 2010 table with the existing table, Greek (Also Coptic), available at the LC policy and Standards Division web site at: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/romanization/greek.pdf: "The Policy and Standards Division has taken another look at the revised Greek Romanization tables in conjunction with comments from the library community and its own staff with knowledge of Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • In Flanders Fields”
    John McCrae and his masterwork, “In Flanders Fields” By Jeff Ball, Theta Xi '79 Prominently featured in Zeta Psi's Pledge manual is a grainy picture of a rather serious-looking fellow with a penetrating gaze. It is the same picture that hangs in the front hall of the Theta Xi chapter of Zeta Psi in Toronto, where it is flanked by 2 bronze plaques, bearing the names of the 25 Theta Xis who died in the Two World Wars. Why is this picture of Dr. John McCrae, Theta Xi, 1894, given such prominence in our fraternity's pledge manual and in Theta Xi's hall of honour? The simple answer is "He wrote a poem: 'In Flanders' Fields'" - but there is more to it than that. In the pages that follow, I hope to illuminate for those interested in the history of our fraternity something of the character of John McCrae and to suggest why this poem is relevant to us today. For the Zete chapters in Toronto and Montreal particularly, the First War was a turning point in our fraternity's history. Zeta Psi had been at the top of the fraternity world at both campuses since Theta Xi's historic founding in 1879 and Alpha Psi's establishment in 1883. We had weathered strong opposition.from establishment and radical alike, but we had thrived and grown and led the fraternity movements at Toronto and McGill through the turn of the century into the oughts and the teens. The First War posed a major threat to our success.
    [Show full text]
  • On Some Series Representations of the Hurwitz Zeta Function Mark W
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 216 (2008) 297–305 www.elsevier.com/locate/cam On some series representations of the Hurwitz zeta function Mark W. Coffey Department of Physics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA Received 21 November 2006; received in revised form 3 May 2007 Abstract A variety of infinite series representations for the Hurwitz zeta function are obtained. Particular cases recover known results, while others are new. Specialization of the series representations apply to the Riemann zeta function, leading to additional results. The method is briefly extended to the Lerch zeta function. Most of the series representations exhibit fast convergence, making them attractive for the computation of special functions and fundamental constants. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. MSC: 11M06; 11M35; 33B15 Keywords: Hurwitz zeta function; Riemann zeta function; Polygamma function; Lerch zeta function; Series representation; Integral representation; Generalized harmonic numbers 1. Introduction (s, a)= ∞ (n+a)−s s> a> The Hurwitz zeta function, defined by n=0 for Re 1 and Re 0, extends to a meromorphic function in the entire complex s-plane. This analytic continuation to C has a simple pole of residue one. This is reflected in the Laurent expansion ∞ n 1 (−1) n (s, a) = + n(a)(s − 1) , (1) s − 1 n! n=0 (a) (a)=−(a) =/ wherein k are designated the Stieltjes constants [3,4,9,13,18,20] and 0 , where is the digamma a a= 1 function.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Alphabet Sight and Sounds of the Greek Letters (Module B) the Letters and Pronunciation of the Greek Alphabet 2 Phonology (Part 2)
    The Greek Alphabet Sight and Sounds of the Greek Letters (Module B) The Letters and Pronunciation of the Greek Alphabet 2 Phonology (Part 2) Lesson Two Overview 2.0 Introduction, 2-1 2.1 Ten Similar Letters, 2-2 2.2 Six Deceptive Greek Letters, 2-4 2.3 Nine Different Greek Letters, 2-8 2.4 History of the Greek Alphabet, 2-13 Study Guide, 2-20 2.0 Introduction Lesson One introduced the twenty-four letters of the Greek alphabet. Lesson Two continues to present the building blocks for learning Greek phonics by merging vowels and consonants into syllables. Furthermore, this lesson underscores the similarities and dissimilarities between the Greek and English alphabetical letters and their phonemes. Almost without exception, introductory Greek grammars launch into grammar and vocabulary without first firmly grounding a student in the Greek phonemic system. This approach is appropriate if a teacher is present. However, it is little help for those who are “going at it alone,” or a small group who are learning NTGreek without the aid of a teacher’s pronunciation. This grammar’s introductory lessons go to great lengths to present a full-orbed pronunciation of the Erasmian Greek phonemic system. Those who are new to the Greek language without an instructor’s guidance will welcome this help, and it will prepare them to read Greek and not simply to translate it into their language. The phonic sounds of the Greek language are required to be carefully learned. A saturation of these sounds may be accomplished by using the accompanying MP3 audio files.
    [Show full text]