DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Design Document, Climate, Community, and Biodiversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Design Document, Climate, Community, and Biodiversity Project Design Document, Validated to the Climate, Community, and Biodiversity Standards (2nd ed) October 31, 2012 Editorial services for the preparation of this document were provided by Leslie Prpich of Beyond Words Editing. 2 Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ 6 List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... 7 Abbreviations........................................................................................................................ 8 GENERAL SECTION............................................................................................................... 10 G1. Original Conditions in the Project Area ...................................................................................11 G1.1. Project Area Location and Basic Physical Parameters...............................................................11 G1.2. Types and Condition of Vegetation within the Project Area.....................................................15 G1.3. Boundaries of the Project Area and the Project Zone ..............................................................19 G1.4. Current Carbon Stocks in the Project Area ...............................................................................22 G1.5. Description of Communities in the Project Zone ......................................................................22 G1.6. Current Land Use, Property Rights, and Unresolved Conflicts..................................................28 G1.7. Current Biodiversity in the Project Zone, and Threats to It ......................................................33 G1.8. High Conservation Values Within the Project Zone ..................................................................37 G2. Baseline Projections ...............................................................................................................45 G2.1. Most Likely Land-Use Scenario in the Absence of the Project..................................................45 G2.2. Additionality ..............................................................................................................................47 G2.3. Estimated Carbon Stock Changes in the Without-Project Scenario..........................................48 G2.4. How the Without-Project Scenario Would Affect Project Zone Communities .........................52 G2.5. How the Without-Project Scenario Would Affect Biodiversity .................................................58 G3. Project Design and Goals ........................................................................................................61 G3.1. Major Climate, Community, and Biodiversity Objectives .........................................................61 G3.2. Project Activities........................................................................................................................61 G3.3. Project Location, Boundaries of Project Area, and Location of Project Activities ....................65 G3.4. Project Lifetime and GHG Accounting Period ...........................................................................69 G3.5. Risks to the Expected CCB Benefits, and Measures to Mitigate Them .....................................69 G3.6. Measures to Ensure the Maintenance or Enhancement of High Conservation Values............71 G3.7. Measures to Enhance CCB Benefits Beyond the Project Lifetime ............................................72 G3.8. Stakeholder Identification and Involvement in Project Design.................................................72 G3.9. Steps to Communicate and Publicize the CCB Public Comment Period ...................................81 G3.10. Process for Handling Unresolved Conflicts and Grievances....................................................81 G3.11. Project Financial Support ........................................................................................................83 G4. Management Capacity and Best Practices ...............................................................................84 G4.1. Project Proponent .....................................................................................................................84 G4.2. Key Technical Skills and Management Team Expertise.............................................................84 G4.3. Employee Orientation, Training, and Capacity Building............................................................90 G4.4. Equal Opportunity for Employment..........................................................................................91 G4.5. Employment Laws .....................................................................................................................92 G4.6. Employee Safety........................................................................................................................92 3 G4.7. Financial Health of Implementing Organizations......................................................................94 G5. Legal Status and Property Rights.............................................................................................95 G5.1. Compliance with Laws, Regulations, and International Agreements .......................................95 G5.2. Approval from Appropriate Authorities....................................................................................97 G5.3. Non-Encroachment ...................................................................................................................98 G5.4. Involuntary Relocation of People or Important Activities.........................................................99 G5.5. Illegal Activities that Could Affect the Project’s CCB Impacts.................................................100 G5.6. Clear, Uncontested Title to Carbon Rights..............................................................................100 CLIMATE SECTION...............................................................................................................102 CL1. Net Positive Climate Impacts...............................................................................................103 CL1.1. Net Change in Carbon Stocks Due to Project Activities .........................................................103 CL1.2. Net Change in Emissions of Non-CO2 GHGs Such as CH4 and N2O.........................................104 CL1.3. Other GHG Emissions Resulting from Project Activities ........................................................104 CL1.4. Demonstration of Positive Net Climate Impact .....................................................................104 CL1.5. Avoidance of Double Counting ..............................................................................................104 CL2. Offsite Climate Impacts (Leakage)........................................................................................105 CL2.1. Leakage ..................................................................................................................................105 CL2.2. Leakage Mitigation Activities .................................................................................................106 CL2.3. Subtraction of Unmitigated Leakage from the Climate Benefits...........................................106 CL2.4. Non-CO2 Gases .......................................................................................................................106 CL3. Climate Impact Monitoring..................................................................................................107 CL3.1. Carbon Pool Monitoring.........................................................................................................107 CL3.2. Full Monitoring Plan...............................................................................................................109 COMMUNITY SECTION........................................................................................................110 CM1. Net Positive Community Impacts .......................................................................................111 CM1.1. Estimated Impacts on Communities from Project Activities................................................111 CM1.2. Demonstration of No Negative Effects on HCVs G1.8.4–6..................................................119 CM2. Offsite Stakeholder Impacts...............................................................................................121 CM2.1. Potential Negative Impacts on Offsite Stakeholders ...........................................................121 CM2.2. Mitigation of Negative Impacts on Offsite Stakeholders .....................................................121 CM2.3. Demonstration of No Net Negative Impacts on Other Stakeholder Groups .......................122 CM3. Community Impact Monitoring..........................................................................................123 CM3.1. Community Monitoring........................................................................................................123 CM3.2. HCV Monitoring....................................................................................................................123 CM3.3. Full Monitoring Plan .............................................................................................................123 BIODIVERSITY SECTION.......................................................................................................124
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The DRC Seed Sector
    A Quarter-Billion Dollar Industry? The DRC Seed Sector BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Compelling investment opportunities exist for seed companies and seed start-ups in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). This document outlines the market potential and consumer demand trends in the DRC and highlights the high potential of seed production in the country. 1 Executive Summary Compelling investment opportunities exist for seed companies and seed start-ups in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). This document outlines the market potential and consumer demand trends in the DRC and highlights the high potential of seed production in the country. The DRC is the second largest country in Africa with over 80 million hectares of agricultural land, of which 4 to 7 million hectares are irrigable. Average rainfall varies between 800 mm and 1,800 mm per annum. Bimodal and extended unimodal rainfall patterns allow for two agricultural seasons in approximately 75% of the country. Average relative humidity ranges from 45% to 90% depending on the time of year and location. The market potential for maize, rice and bean seed in the DRC is estimated at $191 million per annum, of which a mere 3% has been exploited. Maize seed sells at $3.1 per kilogramme of hybrid seed and $1.6 per kilogramme of OPV seed, a higher price than in Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda and Zambia. Seed-to-grain ratios are comparable with regional benchmarks at 5.5:1 for hybrid maize seed and 5.0:1 for OPV maize seed. The DRC is defined by four relatively distinct sales zones, which broadly coincide with the country’s four principal climate zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Deforestation and Forest Degradation Activities in the DRC
    E4838 V5 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, NATURE CONSERVATION AND TOURISM Public Disclosure Authorized STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE REDD+ PROCESS Public Disclosure Authorized BASELINE REPORT STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE REDD+ Public Disclosure Authorized PROCESS Public Disclosure Authorized October 2014 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE REDD+ PROCESS in the DRC INDEX OF REPORTS Environmental Analysis Document Assessment of Risks and Challenges REDD+ National Strategy of the DRC Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment Report (SESA) Framework Document Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) O.P. 4.01, 4.04, 4.37 Policies and Sector Planning Documents Pest and Pesticide Cultural Heritage Indigenous Peoples Process Framework Management Management Planning Framework (FF) Resettlement Framework Framework (IPPF) O.P.4.12 Policy Framework (PPMF) (CHMF) O.P.4.10 (RPF) O.P.4.09 O.P 4.11 O.P. 4.12 Consultation Reports Survey Report Provincial Consultation Report National Consultation of June 2013 Report Reference and Analysis Documents REDD+ National Strategy Framework of the DRC Terms of Reference of the SESA October 2014 Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment SESA Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Note ........................................................................................................................................ 9 1. Preface ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mai-Ndombe Province: a REDD+ Laboratory in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    RIGHTS AND RESOURCES INITIATIVE | MARCH 2018 Rights and Resources Initiative 2715 M Street NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20007 P : +1 202.470.3900 | F : +1 202.944.3315 www.rightsandresources.org About the Rights and Resources Initiative RRI is a global coalition consisting of 15 Partners, 7 Affiliated Networks, 14 International Fellows, and more than 150 collaborating international, regional, and community organizations dedicated to advancing the forestland and resource rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities. RRI leverages the capacity and expertise of coalition members to promote secure local land and resource rights and catalyze progressive policy and market reforms. RRI is coordinated by the Rights and Resources Group, a non-profit organization based in Washington, DC. For more information, please visit www.rightsandresources.org. Partners Affiliated Networks Sponsors The views presented here are not necessarily shared by the agencies that have generously supported this work, or all of the Partners and Affiliated Networks of the RRI Coalition. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0. – 2 – Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Executive summary ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACTIVE USG PROGRAMS for the DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of the CONGO RESPONSE Last Updated 07/27/20
    ACTIVE USG PROGRAMS FOR THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO RESPONSE Last Updated 07/27/20 BAS-UELE HAUT-UELE ITURI S O U T H S U D A N COUNTRYWIDE NORTH KIVU OCHA IMA World Health Samaritan’s Purse AIRD Internews CARE C.A.R. Samaritan’s Purse Samaritan’s Purse IMA World Health IOM UNHAS CAMEROON DCA ACTED WFP INSO Medair FHI 360 UNICEF Samaritan’s Purse Mercy Corps IMA World Health NRC NORD-UBANGI IMC UNICEF Gbadolite Oxfam ACTED INSO NORD-UBANGI Samaritan’s WFP WFP Gemena BAS-UELE Internews HAUT-UELE Purse ICRC Buta SCF IOM SUD-UBANGI SUD-UBANGI UNHAS MONGALA Isiro Tearfund IRC WFP Lisala ACF Medair UNHCR MONGALA ITURI U Bunia Mercy Corps Mercy Corps IMA World Health G A EQUATEUR Samaritan’s NRC EQUATEUR Kisangani N Purse WFP D WFPaa Oxfam Boende A REPUBLIC OF Mbandaka TSHOPO Samaritan’s ATLANTIC NORTH GABON THE CONGO TSHUAPA Purse TSHOPO KIVU Lake OCEAN Tearfund IMA World Health Goma Victoria Inongo WHH Samaritan’s Purse RWANDA Mercy Corps BURUNDI Samaritan’s Purse MAI-NDOMBE Kindu Bukavu Samaritan’s Purse PROGRAM KEY KINSHASA SOUTH MANIEMA SANKURU MANIEMA KIVU WFP USAID/BHA Non-Food Assistance* WFP ACTED USAID/BHA Food Assistance** SA ! A IMA World Health TA N Z A N I A Kinshasa SH State/PRM KIN KASAÏ Lusambo KWILU Oxfam Kenge TANGANYIKA Agriculture and Food Security KONGO CENTRAL Kananga ACTED CRS Cash Transfers For Food Matadi LOMAMI Kalemie KASAÏ- Kabinda WFP Concern Economic Recovery and Market Tshikapa ORIENTAL Systems KWANGO Mbuji T IMA World Health KWANGO Mayi TANGANYIKA a KASAÏ- n Food Vouchers g WFP a n IMC CENTRAL y i k
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo of the Congo Democratic Republic
    Democratic Republic of the Congo of the Congo Democratic Republic Main objectives Impact • UNHCR provided international protection to some In 2005, UNHCR aimed to strengthen the protection 204,300 refugees in the DRC of whom some 15,200 framework through national capacity building, registra- received humanitarian assistance. tion, and the prevention of and response to sexual and • Some of the 22,400 refugees hosted by the DRC gender-based violence; facilitate the voluntary repatria- were repatriated to their home countries (Angola, tion of Angolan, Burundian, Rwandan, Ugandan and Rwanda and Burundi). Sudanese refugees; provide basic assistance to and • Some 38,900 DRC Congolese refugees returned to locally integrate refugee groups that opt to remain in the the DRC, including 14,500 under UNHCR auspices. Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC); prepare and UNHCR monitored the situation of at least 32,000 of organize the return and reintegration of DRC Congolese these returnees. refugees into their areas of origin; and support initiatives • With the help of the local authorities, UNHCR con- for demobilization, disarmament, repatriation, reintegra- ducted verification exercises in several refugee tion and resettlement (DDRRR) and the Multi-Country locations, which allowed UNHCR to revise its esti- Demobilization and Reintegration Programme (MDRP) mates of the beneficiary population. in cooperation with the UN peacekeeping mission, • UNHCR continued to assist the National Commission UNDP and the World Bank. for Refugees (CNR) in maintaining its advocacy role, urging local authorities to respect refugee rights. UNHCR Global Report 2005 123 Working environment Recurrent security threats in some regions have put another strain on this situation.
    [Show full text]
  • CAP 2004 Drcongo SCREEN.Pdf
    In Tribute In 2003 many United Nations, International Organisation, and Non-Governmental Organisation staff members died while helping people in several countries struck by crisis. Scores more were attacked and injured. Aid agency staff members were abducted. Some continue to be held against their will. In recognition of our colleagues’ commitment to humanitarian action and pledging to continue the work we began together We dedicate this year’s appeals to them. FOR ADDITIONAL COPIES, PLEASE CONTACT: UN OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS PALAIS DES NATIONS 8-14 AVENUE DE LA PAIX CH - 1211 GENEVA, SWITZERLAND TEL.: (41 22) 917.1972 FAX: (41 22) 917.0368 E-MAIL: [email protected] THIS DOCUMENT CAN ALSO BE FOUND ON HTTP://WWW.RELIEFWEB.INT/ UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, November 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................. 1 Summary of Requirements – By Appealing Organisation .............................................................................2 Summary of Requirements – By Sector ........................................................................................................ 3 2. THE YEAR IN REVIEW................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Changes In the Humanitarian Situation................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Cycles Approved by OHRM for S
    Consolidated list of duty stations approved by OHRM for rest and recuperation (R & R) (as of 1 July 2015) Duty Station Frequency R & R Destination AFGHANISTAN Entire country 6 weeks Dubai ALGERIA Tindouf 8 weeks Las Palmas BURKINA FASO Dori 12 weeks Ouagadougou BURUNDI Bujumbura, Gitega, Makamba, Ngozi 8 weeks Nairobi CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC Entire country 6 weeks Yaoundé CHAD Abeche, Farchana, Goré, Gozbeida, Mao, N’Djamena, Sarh 8 weeks Addis Ababa COLOMBIA Quibdo 12 weeks Bogota COTE D’IVOIRE Entire country except Abidjan and Yamoussoukro 8 weeks Accra DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO Aru, Beni, Bukavu, Bunia, Butembo, Dungu, Goma, Kalemie, Mahagi, Uvira 6 weeks Entebbe Bili, Bandundu, Gemena, Kamina, Kananga, Kindu, Kisangani, Matadi, Mbandaka, Mbuji-Mayi 8 weeks Entebbe Lubumbashi 12 weeks Entebbe DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF KOREA Pyongyang 8 weeks Beijing ETHIOPIA Kebridehar 6 weeks Addis Ababa Jijiga 8 weeks Addis Ababa GAZA Gaza (entire) 8 weeks Amman GUINEA Entire country 6 weeks Accra HAITI Entire country 8 weeks Santo Domingo INDONESIA Jayapura 12 weeks Jakarta IRAQ Baghdad, Basrah, Kirkuk, Dohuk 4 weeks Amman Erbil, Sulaymaniah 8 weeks Amman KENYA Dadaab, Wajir, Liboi 6 weeks Nairobi Kakuma 8 weeks Nairobi KYRGYZSTAN Osh 8 weeks Istanbul LIBERIA Entire country 8 weeks Accra LIBYA Entire country 6 weeks Malta MALI Gao, Kidal, Tesalit 4 weeks Dakar Tombouctou, Mopti 6 weeks Dakar Bamako, Kayes 8 weeks Dakar MYANMAR Sittwe 8 weeks Yangon Myitkyina (Kachin State) 12 weeks Yangon NEPAL Bharatpur, Bidur, Charikot, Dhunche,
    [Show full text]
  • Usg Humanitarian Assistance to the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    USG HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO Dekoa ORIENTALE NORTH KIVU CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC Mercy Corps UNICEF EG C a AAH/USA Cƒ Première Urgence ƒSUDANWHH ƒ JC C Concern aECƒ Samaritan’s Purse E WFP a CRS JaE Bangui Ango Solidarités ƒ Î! Gbadolite IMC aEG}Jç Bondo KENYA Dungu IRC Nord Ubangi Bondo Faradje Gç Libenge Haut Bas Uele Mercy Corps B Niangara Faradje J Gemena a Uele m Poko Watsa Merlin } Businga Aketi b Aru G Jç Sud Ubangi e Odro Aketi Buta s Isirio Watsha a Première Urgence Buta Rungu Mungbere Cƒ M Samaritan’s Bumba ORIENTALE ah E Lisala agi Purse Ja C Wamba Ituri Mongala on Djungu g UNICEF o Basoko aE R Banalia Bunia EQUATEUR . Basoko Mambasa Ituri Irumu WHH aECƒ Basankusu EQUATEUR Banalia Bafwasende Bukiringui WRI ƒ Yahuma Yangambi Tshopo Lake Albert WFP Bafwasende WFP Equateur Isangi Kisangani Beni UGANDA Beni Lake Kisangani George Î! Bolomba Ekoli Lubero Butembo Kampala Boende NORTHNORTH KENYA Lake Ubundu Peneluta KIVU Edward Opala Ubundu Tshuapa Lubutu North Kivu SOUTH KIVU Ikela Walikale MANIEMA AAH/USA Cƒ Punia Masisi A Kigali Handicap WFP Lake D Kivu N Î! International C Maniema Kalehe A W IMC } South Kivu R aEG Jç MANIEMA Shabunda Tearfund ƒ Mai Ndombe SOUTH KIVUUvira Kindu Sankuru Bujumbura WFP Kilembwe Mwenga Uvira Î! BURUNDI ADRA Kole Lodja I BANDUNDU Kibombo Makobola KASAI IMC G Jç Ilebo ORIENTAL Fizi SFCG B p Bulungu Kasongo Bena Tearfund Mweka Mamba p Kasai Lusambo V Kikwit TANZANIA WFP ƒ Kwilu Lubao Kongolo KASAI OCCIDENTAL KEY Kananga Kabinda Kalemie Mbuji- Kabalo Mayi Lake FY 2008
    [Show full text]
  • The Mai Ndombe Redd+ Project Second Monitoring & Implementation Report (M2)
    MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 THE MAI NDOMBE REDD+ PROJECT SECOND MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT (M2) Document Prepared by Wildlife Works Carbon Project Title The Mai Ndombe REDD+ Project Project ID 934 Version 4.3 Report ID 1 Date of Issue 22-October-2017 Project Location Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mai Ndombe Province Wildlife Works Carbon Project Proponent(s) Jeremy T. Freund [email protected]; 415-331-8081 Jeremy T. Freund, Simon Bird and Mike Korchinsky Prepared By Wildlife Works Carbon CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 1 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 EPIC Sustainability Services K. Suryanarayana Murthy Validation/Verification Body [email protected] +91 9845759000 GHG Accounting/Crediting 14 March 2011 – 13 March 2041 Period 30-year crediting period Monitoring Period of this 01 November 2012 – 31 December 2016 Report Validation: 06 December 2011 History of CCB Status Verification (m1): 06 December 2011 Climate and Biodiversity Gold Level Criteria The Project will conserve flora and fauna within the Project Area. Protecting these 2 former logging concessions will maintain critical forested area and the ecosystem services that it provides, as well as rehabilitate habitat for endangered charismatic animals such as the Bonobo and Forest Elephant. By protecting the native forest, the Project will also increase the resilience of the ecosystem to the effects of climate change. Section GL1.4 of the CCB PDD exemplifies many additional Project Activities that will help both local communities and biodiversity to minimize and adapt to expected climate change impacts. Improved seed distribution and training on improved Gold Level Criteria agricultural methods will lead to increased yields and adaptation to changes in rainfall, the timing of growing seasons, and changing temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the National Program for Onchocerciasis Control in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Review Review of the National Program for Onchocerciasis Control in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Jean-Claude Makenga Bof 1,* , Fortunat Ntumba Tshitoka 2, Daniel Muteba 2, Paul Mansiangi 3 and Yves Coppieters 1 1 Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] 2 Ministry of Health: Program of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) for Preventive Chemotherapy (PC), Gombe, Kinshasa, DRC; [email protected] (F.N.T.); [email protected] (D.M.) 3 Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa (UNIKIN), Lemba, Kinshasa, DRC; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-493-93-96-35 Received: 3 May 2019; Accepted: 30 May 2019; Published: 13 June 2019 Abstract: Here, we review all data available at the Ministry of Public Health in order to describe the history of the National Program for Onchocerciasis Control (NPOC) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Discovered in 1903, the disease is endemic in all provinces. Ivermectin was introduced in 1987 as clinical treatment, then as mass treatment in 1989. Created in 1996, the NPOC is based on community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI). In 1999, rapid epidemiological mapping for onchocerciasis surveys were launched to determine the mass treatment areas called “CDTI Projects”. CDTI started in 2001 and certain projects were stopped in 2005 following the occurrence of serious adverse events. Surveys coupled with rapid assessment procedures for loiasis and onchocerciasis rapid epidemiological assessment were launched to identify the areas of treatment for onchocerciasis and loiasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Republique Democratique Du Congo Rapport De Base Redd+
    REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE ET TOURISME EVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET SOCIALE STRATÉGIQUE DU PROCESSUS REDD+ RAPPORT DE BASE ANALYSE ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET SOCIALE STRATÉGIQUE DU PROCESSUS REDD+ 6 Janvier 2015 ÉVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET SOCIALE STRATEGIQUE DU PROCESSUS REDD+ en RDC INDEX DES RAPPORTS Document d’analyse environnementale Évaluation des risques et des enjeux Stratégie Nationale REDD+ de la RDC Rapport d’Evaluation Environnementale et Sociale Stratégique (EESS) Document cadre Cadre de Gestion Environnementale et Sociale (CGES) O.P. 4.01, 4.04, 4.37 Documents de politiques et de planification sectoriel Cadre de Gestion des Cadre de Gestion du Cadre de Planification en Cadre Fonctionnel Pestes et Pesticides Patrimoine Culturel Faveur des Populations (CF) Cadre de Politique Autochtones (CGPP) (CGPC) O.P.4.12 de Réinstallation O.P.4.09 O.P 4.11 (CPFPA) (CPR) O.P.4.10 O.P. 4.12 Rapports des Consultations Rapport d’enquête Rapport des consultations Rapport des consultations provinciales nationales de juin 2013 Documents de référence et d’analyse Stratégie Nationale Cadre REDD+ de la RDC Termes de référence de l’EESS 6 Janvier 2015 Évaluation environnementale et sociale stratégique Rapport de L’EESS TABLE DES MATIERES Note liminaire ............................................................................................................................................. 9 1. Avant propos ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Distribution of Banana Bunchy Top Virus Related Agro-Ecosystem in South Western, Democratic Republic of Congo
    American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2014, 5, 647-658 Published Online March 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ajps http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.55079 Occurrence and Distribution of Banana bunchy top virus Related Agro-Ecosystem in South Western, Democratic Republic of Congo Lyna Fama Tongo Mukwa1,2*, M. Muengula3, I. Zinga4, A. Kalonji3, M. L. Iskra-Caruana5, C. Bragard2 1Clinique des Plantes de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo 2Earth and Life Institute, Applied Microbiology-Phytopathology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la- Neuve, Belgium 3Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques de l’Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo 4Laboratoire des Sciences Biologiques et Agronomiques pour le Développement (LASBAD), Université de Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic 5Centre International de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Montpellier, France Email: *[email protected] Received 16 December 2013; revised 12 February 2014; accepted 1 March 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) is one of the most severe and widespread virus limiting produc- tion and distribution of planting material of banana (Musa spp.) crops in the world. In Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), these crops play a major role in daily life of almost 70% of citizen. Many factors influence banana production negatively such as Banana bunchy top disease. Epidemiol- ogical survey was conducted in experimental stations and farmers’ fields for two consecutive sea- sons covering 72 sites in five provinces of south western of RDC.
    [Show full text]