DOCSLIB.ORG

London Assembly Regeneration Committee - Wednesday 9 October 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
London Assembly Regeneration Committee - Wednesday 9 October 2019 Appendix 1 London Assembly Regeneration Committee - Wednesday 9 October 2019 Transcript of Agenda item 5 – Public Land Disposals and Regeneration Tony Devenish AM (Chairman): We have quickly moved on to the most substantive item today. I welcome each of our guests: working from my left to right, Peter Lewis, Interim Chief Finance Officer, Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC); Matthew Punshon, Interim Director of Estate Strategy, Metropolitan Police Service (MPS); Sue Budden, Director of Corporate Services, London Fire Brigade (LFB); from our home team James Murray, Deputy Mayor [for Housing and Residential Development], and Justin Carr, Assistant Director [of Public Land, Greater London Authority (GLA)]; David Gooch from Network Homes; Martin Rooney from the National Health Service (NHS); and Lester Hampson from Transport for London (TfL). Welcome. All right. Shall we start with the questions? Let us go straight into it. Each of you - MOPAC, the LFB and the NHS - can answer in turn. Could you briefly describe the estate ownership structure in your public body and the mechanism you have in place to identify and bring surplus land to market, please? Who would like to kick off? Sue? Sue Budden (Director of Corporate Services, LFB): I can do [that]. We are probably the simpler of the organisations [in terms of estates] in front of you. The majority of our estate now is fire stations and so our estate is operational, owned by the London Fire Commissioner (LFC), Dany Cotton. The governance structure above that is through the Deputy Mayor [for Fire and Resilience] to the Mayor. Any acquisitions or disposals to have to be prior approved by the Deputy Mayor [for Fire and Resilience] before the LFC takes the final decision. That is our structure. Our estates strategy is much more about refurbishing and the quality of the estate to make it fit for operational purposes rather than disposals. We did go through a disposal process following our Fifth London Safety Plan but we do not have any further plans at the moment to close stations or dispose of land. Tony Devenish AM (Chairman): I will not ask you the first part of the next bit of the question, but could you provide an indication of the potential for disposal and delivery over the next three to five years? Is there anything coming forth? Sue Budden (Director of Corporate Services, LFB): We have a couple of tiny sites that have masts on them and there is an underground toilet in Brompton. They are really de minimis sites now. We do not have anything coming up. Tony Devenish AM (Chairman): Thank you. The MPS, please? Peter Lewis (Interim Chief Finance Officer, MOPAC): Perhaps if I can take the first part of the question, Chairman, in terms of the structure, the land holding is via MOPAC. It is responsible for the property portfolio and clearly a very similar structure to the LFC in the sense of decision-making through the Deputy Mayor [for Policing and Crime] as appropriate. Identification of operational requirements feeds into that. Perhaps if I can ask my colleague Matthew to talk to you about how surplus sites are identified, you will get a fuller answer. Tony Devenish AM (Chairman): Thank you. Matthew Punshon (Interim Director of Estate Strategy, MPS): Thank you, Chairman. We have over the last 10 years had two sets of estate strategies focusing on the agenda of reduction. The first part of the estate strategy was looking really at rationalising the estate and pushing people into corners where we could create space. The second part, which is the more critical part, over the last three years has been focused on an operational transformation that has been happening within the MPS. Once we sold New Scotland Yard, we raised enough cash to start buying the mobile technology that we needed to have, which fundamentally changed the way that we operate and enabled us to consolidate into a larger set of buildings. We start out with a requirement from the operations. The Estates Team then focuses on where that requirement will land into the estate and then the utilisation of that estate, meeting utilisation targets, standard government property agency type targets, which throws up a series of surplus properties, generally the smaller properties around but not necessarily all smaller properties. We have sitting at the moment in our disposal list about 75 properties for disposal. The three big ones are Paddington Green and two sites at Hendon still. The question at the moment is that we are revising our entire estate strategy in the light of the Prime Minister’s [The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP] announcement of the uplift of 20,000 police officers. As you may be aware, the Mayor has asked for 6,000 officers from that, which will also include between 1,000 and 2,000 additional staff. That requires a fundamental look at the estate. That being said, the strategy does not change that much because the consolidation down into larger buildings and having more mobile offices is the key. If you look at our estate over the next 10 years, there may be a few sites that we will retain that are currently on the disposal list, but the bulk – my guess at the moment and it is still under review – will remain on the disposal list. To give an indication of size, apart from the big ones we spoke about – Paddington Green and Hendon are about 50% of our estate with about 1,200 expected units to be built on those two sites – the rest are spread across the other 70-odd sites with a rough average of 20 to 25 units per site. Tony Devenish AM (Chairman): Great, thank you. The NHS? Martin Rooney (Director of Partnerships, Strategic Estates Planning Service, NHS): Hello. I am here as a representative of the national Strategic Estates Planning Team in the NHS and so some of my observations are based on the national picture. I am happy to do my best to answer London-specific queries. In relation to our ownership structure, it is possibly fair to say that it is more complex than some of the descriptions you have already heard today. Across almost 30 individual NHS trust organisations and NHS Property Services, there are a whole series of different estate ownership models and plans in place. The question was around how sites are potentially identified as surplus and taken forward for disposal. There is an NHS-wide policy called the Estates Code, which defines how sites are identified, brought forward and ultimately disposed of in order to secure best value. I guess the key message in relation to the question is that at the moment in the NHS we are trying to drive and derive surplus land and efficiency through estates management on the back of a clinically led and service-led change to NHS services. We are doing that across five sustainability and transformation partnership (STP) level estate strategies. In each of those estate strategies, there is an efficiency drive and a disposable plan and pipeline. Ultimately, because of the requirements of the Estates Code that I mentioned a minute or two ago, organisations are required to bring forward sites that are known to be surplus. Once they are declared surplus, they go through a fairly well-established process of advertising sites for other public sector use first before releasing them onto the open market. I am happy to elaborate a little bit further on that as part of the discussion. Does that answer the question? Tony Devenish AM (Chairman): Yes, for now. James, you have been in post now for three years and you are working to your main target of building the houses you need to build, but how have you worked with each of these three bodies to simplify the process and try to drive forward the disposal of sites and more mixed developments and particularly housing? James Murray (Deputy Mayor for Housing and Residential Development): We found very clearly when we came into office that, although public sector landowners might know where some of their land holdings are, the really hard bit is to work out which are surplus or to actually make them surplus by consolidating, reorganising and changing how services are delivered. That is actually the really hard work. Finding the ownership is not the easy bit and I do not want to imply that any of it is easy, but the real hard work lies in working out which sites are surplus and which can be brought forward for housing. We have been having very much close working relationships with the individual public sector landowners, whether that is the NHS trusts across London. Rather than going in right at the top and trying to get an agreement from the Secretary of State or someone at the Cabinet Office to order an NHS trust to do something, we have found it much more effective to be working with the NHS trusts more from the bottom up to work out what their strategies are for their sites. A good example is working with the mental health trust around the St Ann’s Hospital site in Haringey. We came to a really good solution there, whereby the mental health trust got the capital receipt that it needed for its new health facilities and we got control of the site, which is now out to tender on the London Development Panel. Another good example is the Whittington Health Trust, which is at a much earlier state of progression, but we are working with the Whittington Health Trust and look at all of the operations on its estate to see whether at some point there will be some land that can be used for housing in a way that we might support.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Agreement for London
    Devolution Working Group A New Agreement for London September 2015 Devolution Working Group Darren Johnson (Chair) Green Len Duvall (Deputy Chair) Labour Andrew Boff Conservative Caroline Pidgeon MBE Liberal Democrat The Devolution Working Group The Fiscal Devolution Working Group was established by the GLA Oversight Committee in December 2013. In response to policy developments, at its meeting of 20 November 2014, the GLA Oversight Committee amended the title to the Devolution Working Group and agreed the following amended terms of reference: • To consider London’s case for further devolved services and taxes in the context of developments including the Scottish referendum and the devolved model of service provision announced for Manchester; • To progress the case for further devolution to London by developing practical solutions to unanswered questions including how additional powers and yield from any localised taxes could work in terms of the roles and responsibilities of GLA and London Boroughs; and • To develop draft position statements for the Assembly’s consideration on issues related to the potential further devolution of powers to London Government and any potential changes to governance arrangements within London Government and to take the lead in promoting the Assembly’s agreed views on these matters. Contact Richard Derecki Email: [email protected] Contact: 020 7983 4899 2 Contents Foreword ...................................................................................................................... 4
    [Show full text]
  • Research Unit
    September 2019 Research Unit Briefing: Mapping the Mayor’s Strategies An analysis of the Mayor of London’s strategic policy and spending priorities 1 September 2019 Briefing: Mapping the Mayor’s Strategies About the London Assembly The London Assembly is part of the Greater London Authority (GLA). The Assembly is made up of 25 Members who are elected by Londoners at the same time as the Mayor. It is the job of the Assembly to hold the Mayor and Mayoral advisers to account by publicly examining policies, activities and decisions that affect Londoners. The London Assembly question the Mayor’s plans and actions directly at Mayor’s Question Time and our committees examine issues that matter to Londoners through public meetings and investigations. Jennette Arnold OBE Tony Arbour Gareth Bacon Shaun Bailey Sian Berry Labour Conservative Conservative Conservative Green Andrew Boff Leonie Cooper Tom Copley Unmesh Desai Tony Devenish Conservative Labour Labour Labour Conservative Andrew Dismore Len Duvall OBE Florence Eshalomi Nicky Gavron Susan Hall Labour Labour Labour Labour Conservative David Kurten Joanne McCartney Steve O’Connell Caroline Pidgeon MBE Keith Prince Brexit Alliance Labour Conservative Liberal Democrat Conservative Caroline Russell Dr Onkar Sahota Navin Shah Fiona Twycross Peter Whittle Green Labour Labour Labour Brexit Alliance 2 September 2019 Contents 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Persons Nominated
    Greater London Authority Election of London Members of the London Assembly Thursday 6 May 2021 STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATES NOMINATED Here follows the registered parties which remain nominated, together with the list of persons who stand as candidates for those parties; the persons who remain nominated as individual candidates; and any other persons who have been nominated, together with the reasons why they no longer stand nominated. Party Candidates T Any other persons who have been nominated and the reason why they no longer stand nominated Party Candidates’ Names and Addresses Animal Welfare HUDSON VANESSA MORLAND SAM BOURKE ALEX AMIN FEMY Party - People, HELEN Address in the Kensington Address in the Hackney Address in the Wycombe Animals, Address in the Tower and Chelsea electoral area electoral area electoral area Environment Hamlets electoral area SCOTT MARK WEISMAN JULIAN 41B HAROLDSTONE Address in the Brent ROAD, WALTHAMSTOW, electoral area LONDON , E17 7AN Christian Peoples MARTIN MAUREEN MAUD SPIBY-VANN HELEN DICKENSON ASHLEY VALINEJAD CAROL Alliance Address in the Lewisham Address in the Haringey KEITH Address in the Bexley electoral area electoral area Address in the Sutton electoral area electoral area ODESANMI EUNICE HORTENSE KATHERINE COKE DESMOND AKHIGBE DONALD ORUYINKA ADE SUSAN Address in the Merton Address in the Redbridge Address in the Greenwich Address in the Lewisham electoral area electoral area electoral area electoral area Communist Party TALBOT ROBIN CAZORLA RODENAS BRAND PHILIP ALLMAN AKIRA
    [Show full text]
  • Public Relations Sub-Committee
    Public Document Pack Public Relations Sub-Committee Date: THURSDAY, 7 JUNE 201 2 Time: 12.00noon Venue: COMMITTEE ROOMS, WES T WING, G UILDHALL Members: Mark Boleat (Chairman) Stuart Fraser (Deputy Chairman) Deputy Douglas Barrow Deputy Michael Cassidy Roger Chadwick Deputy Sir Michael Snyder James Tumbridge Enquiries: Angela Roach tel.no.: 020 7332 3685 [email protected] Lunch will be served for Members in the Guildhall Club at 1pm Chris Duffield Town Clerk and Chief Executive AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES 2. DECLARATIONS BY MEMB ERS OF PERSONAL OR P REJUDICIAL INTERESTS IN RESPECT OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING 3. TERMS OF REFERENCE To note the Sub-Committee’s terms of reference as follows:- To consider and report to the Grand Committee on all matters relating to the Corporation’s Public Relations/Public Affairs activities including any related plans, policies or strategies . 4. MINUTES To agree the public minutes and summary of the meeting held on 23 February 2012 (copy attached). For Decision (Pages 1 - 6) 5. COMMUNICATIONS STRAT EGY 2012 - 2015: UPDATE Report of the Director of Public Relations (copy attached). For Decision (Pages 7 - 26) 6. ADDITIONAL EVENTS AN D TOPICAL ISSUES PAP ERS Report of the Director of Public Relations (copy attached). For Decision (Pages 27 - 32) 7. QUESTIONS ON MATTERS RELATING TO THE WORK OF THE SUB - COMMITTEE 8. ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT THE CH AIRMAN CONSIDERS URG ENT 2 Agenda Item 4 PUBLIC RELATIONS SUB-COMMITTEE 23 February 2012 Minutes of the meeting of the PUBLIC RELATIONS SUB-COMMITTEE held at Guildhall, EC2 on THURSDAY, 23 FEBRUARY 2012 at 12.00noon.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater London Authority Elections, Covering the Election of the Mayor of London and Election to the London Assembly
    Greater London Authority (GLA)• elections Guidance for candidates and agents Overview document This document applies to Greater London Authority elections, covering the election of the Mayor of London and election to the London Assembly. Guidance and resources for other elections in the UK can be accessed from the Commission’s website at: https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am- a/candidate-or-agent Greater London Authority election > Candidates and agents > Overview Contents Purpose of this guidance ......................................................... 3 How to use the guidance ......................................................... 3 The electoral system ................................................................ 5 Who does what at a Greater London Authority election and how to contact them? ............................................................... 6 Greater London Returning Officer ........................................ 6 Constituency Returning Officers ........................................... 6 Electoral Registration Officers .............................................. 7 London Elects....................................................................... 8 The Electoral Commission ................................................... 8 Contacting us ........................................................................... 9 Purpose of this guidance 1.1 This guidance, which the Electoral Commission has produced with the Greater London Returning Officer, aims to provide practical advice for candidates and
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Election for Mayor of London and London Assembly
    GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY NOTICE OF ELECTION ELECTION OF MAYOR OF LONDON AND LONDON-WIDE MEMBERS OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY DATE OF THE POLL 1. In the event of a contest, the date of the poll will be Thursday, 6 May 2021. NOMINATION PAPERS 2. Nomination papers to stand in the elections for the Mayor of London and the 11 London-wide Members (party list and individual) of the London Assembly may be obtained from the office of the Greater London Returning Officer, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA on working days between 9am and 4.30pm. Nomination packs can be downloaded at: https://www.londonelects.org.uk/im-candidate/nominations DELIVERY OF NOMINATION PAPERS 3. Completed nomination papers must be delivered in person and hardcopy (not by email) to the Greater London Returning Officer, Committee Room 1, Lower Ground Floor, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA, on any weekday from the date of this notice between 9am and 4.30pm, but by no later than 4pm on Tuesday 30 March 2021. PAYMENT OF DEPOSITS 4. The deposit for each Mayoral candidate is £10,000. The deposit for each party list or individual candidate in the election of London-wide Members is £5,000. Payment should be made by electronic transfer into the GLA Income Account (Royal Bank of Scotland; sort code 16-00-38; account number 00780445). Payment can also be made by cash or bankers draft (banks operating in the UK only). Cleared funds must be received by 4pm on Tuesday 30 March 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater London Authority
    GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY NOTICE OF ELECTION ELECTION OF MAYOR OF LONDON AND LONDON-WIDE MEMBERS OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY DATE OF THE POLL 1. In the event of a contest, the date of the poll will be Thursday, 6 May 2021. NOMINATION PAPERS 2. Nomination papers to stand in the elections for the Mayor of London and the 11 London-wide Members (party list and individual) of the London Assembly may be obtained from the office of the Greater London Returning Officer, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA on working days between 9am and 4.30pm. Nomination packs can be downloaded at: https://www.londonelects.org.uk/im-candidate/nominations DELIVERY OF NOMINATION PAPERS 3. Completed nomination papers must be delivered in person and hardcopy (not by email) to the Greater London Returning Officer, Committee Room 1, Lower Ground Floor, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA, on any weekday from the date of this notice between 9am and 4.30pm, but by no later than 4pm on Tuesday 30 March 2021. PAYMENT OF DEPOSITS 4. The deposit for each Mayoral candidate is £10,000. The deposit for each party list or individual candidate in the election of London-wide Members is £5,000. Payment should be made by electronic transfer into the GLA Income Account (Royal Bank of Scotland; sort code 16-00-38; account number 00780445). Payment can also be made by cash or bankers draft (banks operating in the UK only). Cleared funds must be received by 4pm on Tuesday 30 March 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 Years On
    2 July 2010 A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 years on Tony Travers and Christine Whitehead A brief history… It is 10 years since the Greater London Authority was created as a metropolitan or regional tier of government for London. There have been five different arrangements of ‘upper tier’ government in the capital since the Metropolitan Board of Works (MBW) was created in 1855 to build infrastructure. The MBW was succeeded by the London County Council (LCC), a powerful authority for the inner part of the contemporary city. Within this area 28 metropolitan boroughs and the City of London delivered ‘local’ services. Two factors were particularly important in influencing the progress of London’s government. First, the physical expansion of the city created demands for provision across a wider area than the City of London’s original and long-evolved ‘square mile’. The Metropolitan Police Service was created by the government in 1829 to meet the law and order requirements of a fast-growing city. The squalor and chaos of the London of the 1850s prompted Parliament to legislate for London’s first-ever metropolitan government, an indirectly-elected entity. Further physical expansion between the end of the 19 th century and 1939 generated a debate about the need for a ‘Greater London’ government 1. The second important factor in determining the kinds of institutions that emerged was the local power and parochialism of both the City of London and the parish-based or ad hoc bodies that developed to deliver services in the absence of a city-wide government.
    [Show full text]
  • London November Tabloid 1
    LondonAutumn/Winter 2015 News Liberal Democrats Keep Britain in join residents to Europe to protect fight third runway London jobs Caroline’s plan for better childcare - Page 2 - - Back Page - - Page 3 - SPECIAL FEATURE Caroline Pidgeon “I will fight cuts to our neighbourhood police” THREAT TO EVERY NEIGHBOURHOOD PCSO AND UP TO 8,000 POLICE OFFICERS p The plans from London’s Conservative Mayor could see every neighbourhood community support officer and 8,000 police officers axed. aroline Pidgeon (left), who is the “PCSOs are the eyes and ears of the offences to PCSOs. These plans would CLiberal Democrat candidate for police on our streets and provide rip the heart out of neighbourhood Mayor and lead Assembly Member, reassurance to Londoners. The Tory policing teams. In a stroke much of the is fighting plans that threaten the Mayor should cut these plans - not cut progress that has been future of neighbourhood policing. our police,” said Caroline. made in making our city The Metropolitan Police have to Save our safer neighbourhood safer will be lost. make large cuts but these Take teams say Lib Dems “With police plans could see over 1000 Police Community Support “The roll out of neighbourhood based officer numbers Action Officers working in policing has made a huge difference to also under threat neighbourhood teams London,” added Caroline. we need to fight to SIGN THE across the capital axed, “There is ample evidence that many protect community and up to 1 in 4 police people, particularly young people, are based policing in PETITION officers lost. more likely to engage with and report London.” - Page 2 - @CarolinePidgeon London News Page 2 londonlibdems.org.uk ü COMMENT No third runway A different kind of Mayor? The race to be Mayor of London has, more often than not, been more of a soap opera than a battle of ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report
    YouGov / QMUL Survey Results Sample Size: 1192 adults in London Fieldwork: 29th March - 1st April 2021 Mayoral Voting Intention Westminster VI Shaun Sadiq Luisa Siân Mandu Peter David Laurence Brian Don’t Would Lib Total Other Refused Con Lab Bailey Khan Porritt Berry Reid Gammons Kurten Fox Rose know not vote Dem Weighted Sample 1192 201 378 58 74 11 9 1 34 26 15 258 71 56 257 415 68 Unweighted Sample 1192 192 429 53 84 16 7 2 34 18 17 241 53 46 236 469 73 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 16-19 29 March- Nov 1 April HEADLINE MAYORAL VOTING INTENTION Mayoral Voting Intention - Round 1 [Weighted by likelihood to vote in mayoral election, excluding those who would not vote, don't know, or refused] Shaun Bailey 30 26 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 3 1 Sadiq Khan 51 47 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 83 39 Luisa Porritt 4 7 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 36 Siân Berry 9 9 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 14 Mandu Reid 1 1 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 Peter Gammons 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 David Kurten - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laurence Fox - 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 7 Brian Rose - 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 Some other candidate 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 2 0 0 Mayoral Voting Intention - Round 2 [Weighted by likelihood to vote in mayoral election, excluding those who would not vote, don't know, or refused] Shaun Bailey 36 34 100 0 14 12 40 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 91 3 10 Sadiq Khan 64 66 0 100 86 88 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 9 97 90 1 © 2021 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing City Governance for Low-Carbon Mobility in London
    sustainability Article Assessing City Governance for Low-Carbon Mobility in London Paul Drummond UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, Central House, London WC1H 0NN, UK; [email protected] Abstract: City-level decisions are crucial for delivering a low carbon transition, particularly as urban population dynamics and environments change in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ensuring appropriate governance structures, mechanisms and resources to facilitate these decisions is therefore essential. Based on a systematic literature review by van der Heijden (2019), this paper develops a simple framework to assess the state of ten enabling factors for effective urban climate governance, and applies it to low-carbon passenger mobility in London. Drawing on documentary evidence and a series of semi-structured expert interviews, it finds that London’s city authorities have a strong capacity for autonomy, stakeholder participation, local leadership and coordination on climate action and mobility, of which they make extensive use. The national legal and political framework remains broadly supportive following the UK’s departure from the EU, but multi-level co-ordination is thin, and funding issues have intensified conflict over political jurisdiction since the pandemic began. Spatial variation in urban form and infrastructure, coupled with dual-layer city administration, complicate the socio-political landscape and drive for climate action in mobility. Keywords: climate change; local government; climate governance; urban transport 1. Introduction Citation: Drummond, P. Assessing Following existing nationally determined contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agree- City Governance for Low-Carbon ment, warming is projected to reach 2.6 ◦C by the end of the century, with a lack of practical Mobility in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Report N4
    Analytical Report n4 Analytical Report 4: Open Data in Cities 1 This study has been prepared by Capgemini Invent as part of the European Data Portal. The European Data Portal is an initiative of the European Commission, implemented with the support of a consortiumi led by Capgemini Invent, including Intrasoft International, Fraunhofer Fokus, con.terra, Sogeti, 52North, Time.Lex, the Lisbon Council, and the University of Southampton. The Publications Office of the European Union is responsible for contract management of the European Data Portal. For more information about this paper, please contact: European Commission Directorate General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology Unit G.1 Data Policy and Innovation Daniele Rizzi – Policy Officer Email: [email protected] European Data Portal Gianfranco Cecconi, European Data Portal Lead Email: [email protected] Written by: Wendy Carrara Wander Engbers Margriet Nieuwenhuis Eva van Steenbergen Last update: 15.07.2020 www: https://europeandataportal.eu/ @: [email protected] DISCLAIMER By the European Commission, Directorate-General of Communications Networks, Content and Technology. The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use, which may be made of the information contained therein. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 © European Union, 2020 OA-BF-20-004-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-78-41898-4 ISSN: 2600-0601 doi: 10.2830/992513 The reuse policy of European Commission documents is implemented by the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p.
    [Show full text]