C) C Cl) Cl) Co .....J C ...0 C .....J L
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
RIVER SEVERN LOWER REACHES CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT SUMMARUSJ5.___ ~-Q
NRA Severn-Trent 30 RIVER SEVERN LOWER REACHES CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT SUMMARUSJ5.___ ~-q. divers jtion Cem oo )ffice > N o | Ac ~*«uwon No A NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region RIVER SEVERN LOWER REACHES CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT SUMMARY 1995 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Catchment Management Planning 1 The Catchment Management Plan Process 2 YOUR VIEWS 2 Vision Statement 3 KEY DETAILS 6 CATCHMENT OVERVIEW 8 Introduction 8 ► Land Use 9 Geology 10 Hydrology 10 Water Resources 11 Water Quality 12 Flood Defence 13 Fisheries 15 Conservation, Landscape and Heritage 15 Recreation and Navigation 16 Infrastructure 17 ISSUES AND OPTIONS 18-42 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 099822 INTRODUCTION The National Rivers Authority (NRA) was created in 1989 as an independent agency in England and Wales to protect and improve the water environment. The NRA has a wide range o f responsibilities for the control of the water environment, in particular: • conservation of water resources • pollution control • flood defence and flood warning • maintenance and improvements o f fisheries • nature conservation in water related habitats • promotion of water based recreation • control of navigation in some areas CATCHMENT The NRA’s vision for the future is of a healthy and diverse water MANAGEMENT PLANNING environment managed in an environmentally sustainable way balancing the needs of all users of water. To achieve this vision, the NRA is taking an integrated approach (ie bringing together its own activities and those of other groups and organisations) to management o f river catchments. A river catchment is an area of land which is drained by a river system. -
Ledbury to Gloucester Copy Better
Ledbury to Gloucester Railway Ledbury to Gloucester by rail Taken from David Postle’s book of the same name and is seen through the eyes of the Driver and Fireman of the last passenger train on the branch on the 11th July 1959. The driver was Jack Folley and the fireman Jim Kavanagh. Jim checked the fire again and looked at the pressure gauge, and decided that he ought to put a little more coal on the fire. He picked up his shovel, opened the fire hole doors and placed half a dozen shovelfuls round the firebox, turned on the injector again because he knew that shortly he would be stopping at Barber’s Bridge with a minute or two in hand to gain any pressure that might be lost by putting more water into the boiler. He picked up a little hand brush and swept the coal dust from the floorboards of the cab. ‘Even when the railway was opened, no attempt was made to advertise the new service. It wasn’t until the end of August that the G.W.R. advertised a summer excursion from Cheltenham to Malvern via Newest. The line was obviously considered important by some because, in the sales particulars of property on the market at that time, the proximity to the new railway was very often stressed’ ‘Did the railway look as though it might fulfil its potential’, asked Jim. ‘Early newspaper reports were very optimistic. The first five weeks saw over 2000 passengers booked at Newest and just over half that at Dymock.’ ‘Talking in the early days,’ said Jim, ‘the guard told me at Ledbury that we have an elderly gentleman on board who travelled on the first train, and here he is, on the last one over the Branch.’ ‘Is that right? I suppose it just goes to show how short-lived this Branch has been.’ ‘Whilst on the subject of people, did I tell you about Dick Nash?’ asked Jack. -
4542 the London Gazette, 21 August, 1953
4542 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 21 AUGUST, 1953 Railway Line by way of an overhead reinforced Standish—Hope Cottage, Gloucester Road, Stone- concrete footbridge with approaches. house. A certified copy of the Order and of the map con- Tirley—Torsend Cottage, Tirley. tained in the Order as confirmed by the Minister has Twigworth—c/o Mr. E. J. Jones, Far End, Twig- been deposited at the Council Offices, Argyle Road* worth. Sevenoaks, and will be open for inspection free of Upton St. Leonards—'Village Hall, Upton St. charge between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. on Leonards. Weekdays and between 9 a.m. and 12 noon on Westbury-on-Severn—Lecture Hall, Westbury-on- Saturday. Severn. The Order becomes operative as from 'the 21st Whitminster—c/o iMr. A. E. Wyer, The Garage, day of August, 1953, but if any person aggrieved Whitminster. by the Order desires to question the validity thereof In exceptional circumstances special arrangements or of any provision contained therein on the grounds will be made for the draft map and statement to be that it is not within the powers of the National Parks inspected out of office hours. and Access to the Countryside Act, 1949, or on the Any objection or representation with respect to ground -that any requirement of the Act or any the draft map or statement may be sent in writ- regulation made thereunder has not been complied ing to the undersigned before the 30th day of April, with in relation to the approval of the Order he 1954, and any such objection or representation should may. -
Herefordshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
The aims of planning policy on development and flood risk are to ensure that flood risk is taken into account at all stages of the planning process to avoid inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding, and to direct development away from areas at highest risk. LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Herefordshire TECHNICAL REPORT DRAWINGS & APPENDICES 3rd Edition REPORT QUALITY CONTROL Report 1110-TR1-C – Herefordshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment This document has been prepared by Brian Faulkner - Independent Consultant, for Herefordshire Council, in association with Amey PLC, Hereford. Technical analysis, where appropriate, has been undertaken utilising industry standard software and the highest professional standards. Copyright of this information is hereby vested only in the client and its Agents. No responsibility is accepted for liabilities arising to any third party from the unapproved use of this material. Prepared by: ....................................................... Mat Jackson Analyst Checked by: ........................................................ Brian Faulkner MSc FCIWEM FConsE MCMI Supervising Consultant Approved by: ........................................................ Ross Garbutt CEng MICE Principal Date : 25 March 2009 CONTACT DETAILS E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: +44 (0) 1392 666 953 Mobile: +44 (0) 7967 399 874 Website: www.waterconsultant.com REVISION HISTORY Issue Details Media Date Circulation List DRAFT DRAFT 2 copies issued to Herefordshire Council H/c + PDF 24-04-08 KS; 2nd Ed. 2nd and finalised edition incorporating EA comments h/c + PDF 08-10-08 KS; MD of 20 June 2008 on CD 3rd Ed. Updated text at request of EA 22-12-08 and additional h/c + PDF 25-03-09 KS; MD Tables on CD Cover Photograph – Courtesy of A Terry Strategic Flood Risk Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. -
Tewkesbury Borough Council
TEWKESBURY BOROUGH COUNCIL rs L::< Council Offices, Gloucester Road, TEWK.ESBUR Y, G L20 5TT W.W . STRACHAN Telephone TEWKESBURY (0684) · 2950 10 B.Sc., M.Sc., M.R.T .P.l. This matter is being dealt with by ....• '.:.~~.: ...~ .~.~ ~.~. ~~.~.. ••........... Ext . .....~}.~ .~---···· Borough Planning Officer Your Ref. Our Ref. JW/RJC/T G.2 775/ K 20t h February , 1987 ~-.. < For information Highnam Court, Highnam ) Outline application for the erection of a retirement village, hotel and opera box including the Highnam Court House and gardens. Construction of a new vehicular and pedestrian access. The above application was considered by Committe on 17th February, 1987. i-, , . Members resolved, after considerable debate, to accept the ' proposals in principle and NOT REFUSE the applica .t i on subject to the application being advertised in the press as a material departure from the provisions of the County Structure Plan and the Gloucester North Environs Local Plan. Proposals will, after advertising, need to be referred to the Department of .the · Environment before any formal determination . • The Department of the ;,. .. ( Environment can either call in the application for their determination or allow the Authority to determine as they see fit. You will be notified when a final decision has been made. ' ~. i )._· Cr-/--~ · ,, [f-~ Agenda Item 4(d) ' Planning Committee . 8' 17th March,1987 . REPORT OF CHIEF OFFICERS MANAGEMENTTEAM ~:' (INITIATED BY BOROUGHPLANNING OFFICER) HIGHNAMCOURT: PROPOSED-RETIREMENTCOMPLEX (Tfr.2775/K) STATEMENTOF BOROUGHCOUNCIL'S SUPPORT . El- Background On 20th February,1987 the Borough Planning Committee elected not to refuse an outline application for the erection of a retirement village, hotel and opera box at the above site. -
Land South of Oakridge, Highnam, Gloucestershire, Gl2 8Ef Application Ref: 16/00486/Out
Our ref: PCU/APP/G1630/W/3184272 David Jones Your ref: 13475 Evans Jones Ltd Royal Mews St. Georges Place Cheltenham Gloucestershire 20 December 2018 G50 3PQ Dear Sir, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL MADE BY R KEENE AND SONS LAND SOUTH OF OAKRIDGE, HIGHNAM, GLOUCESTERSHIRE, GL2 8EF APPLICATION REF: 16/00486/OUT 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of H Baugh-Jones BA (Hons) DipLA MA CMLI, who held a public local inquiry on 22-25 May 2018 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Tewkesbury Borough Council to refuse your client’s application for outline planning permission for the erection of 40 dwellings with all matters reserved except access, in accordance with application ref: 16/00486/OUT, dated 3 May 2016. 2. On 4 July 2018, this appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed, and planning permission refused. 4. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions, and agrees with his recommendation. He has decided to dismiss the appeal and refuse planning permission. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report. Procedural matters 5. On 26 October 2018, Government published “Technical consultation on updates to national planning policy and guidance”, dealing with the calculation of Local Housing Need and other matters. -
Midlands Woodland for Water Project
MMiiddllaannddss WWooooddllaanndd ffoorr WWaatteerr PPrroojjeecctt PPhhaassee 11:: OOppppoorrttuunniittyy MMaappppiinngg FFiinnaall RReeppoorrtt Samantha Broadmeadow, Huw Thomas and Tom Nisbet Forest Research February 2013 Opportunity Mapping Executive Summary The Midlands Region faces a number of major water issues, with over 100,000 properties at significant risk of flooding and 85% of river waterbodies currently failing to meet the target Good Ecological Status required by the Water Framework Directive. A number of recent publications provide strong evidence of the ability of woodland creation to help tackle these pressures by reducing and delaying flood waters, limiting pollutant loadings and retaining diffuse pollutants. Ongoing studies designed to improve our understanding of the effects of woodland on flood flows have been reviewed and the findings found to further strengthen the supporting evidence base. A significant caveat, however, is the need for care in site selection to ensure that planting does not increase flood risk by synchronising, rather than desynchronising downstream flood flows. The main aim of this study was to identify priority areas for woodland creation and the improved management of existing woodlands to reduce downstream flood risk and achieve the objectives of the Water Framework Directive. A wide range of spatial datasets were accessed from partners, particularly the Environment Agency, and used to generate a large number of maps and supporting GIS shapefiles showing priority areas potentially available for planting. The results provide a strong basis for developing and refining regional objectives, initiatives and projects to deliver new woodlands where they can best contribute to FRM and meet WFD targets, in addition to generating many other benefits for society. -
Waste Core Strategy (WCS) for Gloucestershire (2012) Notes That Suitable Wastes Are Being Used at Some Mineral Sites for Reclamation Purposes
MMiinneerraallss LLooccaall PPllaann SSiittee OOppttiioonnss aanndd DDrraafftt PPoolliiccyy FFrraammeewwoorrkk EEvviiddeennccee PPaappeerr PPllaannnniinngg aanndd EEnnvviirroonnmmeennttaall CCoonnssiiddeerraattiioonnss June 2014 Page | 2 Contents 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Climate change 5 3.0 The Water Environment 14 4.0 Landscape 28 5.0 Green Belt 37 6.0 Nature Conservation (Biodiversity and Geodiversity) 41 7.0 Historic Environment 61 8.0 Transport 76 9.0 Minerals Restoration 88 10.0 Development Management 109 Appendix A Glossary and list of Abbreviations 121 Appendix B Appendix to Section 3 (EA response to Issues and Options) 122 Appendix C Appendix to Section 6 (References and Maps) 124 Appendix D Appendix to Section 7 (References) 128 Appendix E Appendix to Section 8 (Freight Map) 129 Appendix F Appendix to Section 9 (MLP Restoration Policies) 130 Appendix G Appendix to Section 10 (Section 8 of Validation Checklist) 132 P a g e | 3 1.0 Introduction 1.1.1 This paper forms part of the evidence base intended to support the Gloucestershire Minerals Local Plan Site Options and Draft Policy Framework consultation. It contains details of the main planning and environmental policy considerations for minerals planning including climate change, flood risk, landscape, green belt, nature conservation, the historic environment, transport, minerals restoration and development management policies. 1.1.2 Technical issues relating to minerals development and planning such the as types and quantity of minerals required for the plan period and development are discussed in the companion minerals technical evidence paper. There are also supporting papers covering site options for strategic sites for aggregates, the local aggregates assessment and also a separate paper considering the policy framework for minerals safeguarding areas. -
Understanding Tewkesbury Borough 2015
Understanding Tewkesbury Borough 2015 Produced by the Strategic Needs Analysis Team, Gloucestershire County Council Version: v1.0 1 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 2. Executive summary .................................................................................................... 5 3. Tewkesbury Borough context ..................................................................................... 0 3.1 About this section ................................................................................................... 0 3.2 Demographics ......................................................................................................... 0 3.3 Deprivation ............................................................................................................. 8 3.4 Life expectancy ..................................................................................................... 15 3.5 Mortality ................................................................................................................ 16 3.6 Economy ............................................................................................................... 21 3.7 Protected characteristics ....................................................................................... 39 3.8 Key messages ...................................................................................................... 46 4. Getting the right start in life ...................................................................................... -
ROSS-ON-WYE 4 9 Greytree D a 4 O 5 2 R 1 2 H 2
To Hereford Welsh Newton To Hereford A40 A ROSS-ON-WYE 4 9 Greytree d a 4 o 5 2 R 1 2 H 2 6 4 o 4 7 0 m y 6 A4 B r B A40 s u 4 3 R 1 Greytree o b A a d 4 A449 d e Network Review & Consultation A L B Wilton 4 To Ledbury 2 Wilton er 3 st louce B4 3 G Road 024 d 6 B ad a 21 4 Alton Ro 4 Purple Route 2 Ro B A40 2 Street n 1 Ashfield to ROSS-ON-WYE ad l o A This route runs every hour between Coleford, Lydney and Gloucester. Purple and A4 4 Tudorville M R 5 0 1 23 5 field Monmouth 4 0 hen 2 green routes provide a joint service from Gloucester to Westbury-on-Severn and rc 4 B A Merrivale B 29 Goodrich Coleford every 30 minutes. Purple and green routes connect without the need to 42 4 B 6 A change buses in Coleford, improving links between Lydney and Cinderford. 1 Dymock 4 4 B 0 Tudorville 4 2 Green Route 2 A 4 M50 4 B 6 6 3 This route runs every hour between Coleford, Cinderford and Gloucester. Purple 6 1 4 and green routes provide a joint service from Gloucester to Westbury-on-Severn and A Coleford every 30 minutes. Some daytime buses will run via English Bicknor rather 4 3 F 2 H than Worrall Hill. Purple and green routes connect without the need to change buses Gorsley o ig 4 r h Staunton e 5 S B s t 1 t r English Bicknor e in Coleford, improving links between Lydney and Cinderford. -
Flash Flood History Severn and Welsh Borders
Flash flood history Severn and Welsh Borders Hydrometric Rivers Tributaries Towns and Cities area 54 Severn Date and Rainfall Description sources 13-15 Jul <Worcs>: Thunderstorm with heavy rain and hail caused flooding in Worcestershire. 1640 Townshend’s Diary Jones et al 1984 6 Jun 1697 This followed even more <Westhide> (Hereford): In a hailstorm the hailstones were more than 70 mm across. There was no reference to Webb and devastating storms in flooding. Cheshire and Herts Elsom 2016 5 Jul 1726 <Ledbury>, <Herefordshire>: There happened such a sudden shower of rain accompanied by thunder and Ipswich Jour 9 lightning that in the space of half an hour the town was almost drowned, several of the houses being six foot Jul deep in water so that had they not opened the doors and windows to let it out they would have been carried Stanley’s away with the torrent. Several farmers had their litter carried away and many persons their goods and in rooms Newsletter Jul 14 thereof some had fish brought into their lower rooms that was driven out of adjacent ponds. 19 Jun 1728 <Gloucester>: We hear from <Arlington> in the parish of <Bibury> that there happened such a prodigious storm Caledonian of rain that the like has not been seen for more than thirty years which in the space of half an hour caused a Mercury 4 Jul dreadful flood that it carried away more than 50 cartloads of stones some of which were judged to be more than ‘300 Weight’ and fixed in the road which the violence of the flood tore up and drove down the highway and in our common field the mould of several acres was carried off. -
Flooding Survey June 1990 River Avon Catchment
Flooding Survey June 1990 River Avon Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region RIVER CATCHMENT AREAS ? Severn-Trent Region Boundary Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3- Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame @ E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec W»st. Almondsbury. National Rivers Authority Bristol BS32 4UD * ‘ Severn-Trent Re&idn i c-yi * . FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1990 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 24(5) W ater Act 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) RIVER AVON CATCHMENT AND WARWICKSHIRE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 099804 FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT m ivironment Agency NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY information Centre SEVERN-TRENT REGION Head Office SAPPHIRE EAST 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD Class N o ......................... SOLIHULL W MIDLANDS B91 1QT Accession No.................... COHTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References Glossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land Potential Category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Discount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category