DOCSLIB.ORG

Improved Financial Sustainability and Strengthened Resilience of Protected Areas Through Development of Sustainable Recreation and Partnership with Private Sector

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improved Financial Sustainability and Strengthened Resilience of Protected Areas Through Development of Sustainable Recreation and Partnership with Private Sector 5/5/2020 WbgGefportal Project Identification Form (PIF) entry – Full Sized Project – GEF - 7 Improved Financial Sustainability and Strengthened Resilience of Protected Areas Through Development of Sustainable Recreation and Partnership With Private Sector Part I: Project Information GEF ID 10344 Project Type FSP Type of Trust Fund GET CBIT/NGI CBIT NGI Project Title Improved Financial Sustainability and Strengthened Resilience of Protected Areas Through Development of Sustainable Recreation and Partnership With Private Sector Countries Bosnia-Herzegovina Agency(ies) UNDP Other Executing Partner(s) Executing Partner Type https://gefportal2.worldbank.org 1/59 5/5/2020 WbgGefportal UNDP GEF Agency GEF Focal Area Biodiversity Taxonomy Climate resilience, Climate Change Adaptation, Climate Change, Focal Areas, Protected Areas and Landscapes, Biodiversity, Terrestrial Protected Areas, Deploy innovative financial instruments, Influencing models, Private Sector, Stakeholders, SMEs, Civil Society, Non-Governmental Organization, Local Communities, Beneficiaries, Type of Engagement, Consultation, Participation, Information Dissemination, Partnership, Awareness Raising, Communications, Gender Mainstreaming, Gender Equality, Sex-disaggregated indicators, Knowledge Exchange, Capacity, Knowledge and Research, Learning, Indicators to measure change, Adaptive management, Theory of change, Capacity Development, Knowledge Generation Rio Markers Climate Change Mitigation Climate Change Mitigation 0 Climate Change Adaptation Climate Change Adaptation 1 Duration 48 In Months Agency Fee($) 250,800 Submission Date 9/10/2019 https://gefportal2.worldbank.org 2/59 5/5/2020 WbgGefportal A. Indicative Focal/Non-Focal Area Elements Programming Directions Trust Fund GEF Amount($) Co-Fin Amount($) BD-2-7 GET 2,640,000 18,176,839 Total Project Cost ($) 2,640,000 18,176,839 https://gefportal2.worldbank.org 3/59 5/5/2020 WbgGefportal B. Indicative Project description summary Project Objective To achieve practical PA management improvement and better biodiversity status through strengthened resilience of key biodiversity values to climate change impact and increased revenues from sustainable recreation. Project Financing Project Outcomes Project Outputs Trust GEF Amount($) Co-Fin Amount($) Component Type Fund 1. Investme Outcome 1: Managerial and technical Output 1.1: PA GET 855,000 11,200,000 Strengtheni nt capacities of targeted PAs in place helping network climate ng ensure resilience of key biodiversity values to threat assesment resilience climate change impacts measured by: conducted and of targeted climate impacts - 54,765 ha of PAs (48% of total PA estate PAs to research and of BiH) under improved management climate monitoring responsive to the climate-induced threats change module developed impacts - At least 15% increase in METT score for for Protected the targeted PAs (particularily with regard to Landscape the threat management questions) Bijambare and National Park - Increased resilience to climate threats for Sutjeska targeted PAs (positive trends in modified TRA index[1] towards the end of the project) Output 1.2: Management - Sphagnum moss cover increased by at plans for cat.II PAs least 100 sq.m at Prokoško Lake as a result (national parks of ecosystem restoration Drina, Sutjeska, at least 314,600 people (of whom 157,100 are Kozara, Una) women) derive direct benefits from improved developed/update PA management capacities d and under implementation Output 1.3: A portfolio of [1] The Threat Reduction Assessment (TRA) adaptation and index is a summary indicator of the degree to resilience which a project has succeeded in reducing solutions for the threats to conservation at a particular site. targeted species It is calculated as a result of identifying https://gefportal2.worldbank.org 4/59 5/5/2020 WbgGefportal threats, ranking them according to specific and ecosystems criteria, and assessing progress in reducing set under each of them The standard TRA approach will implementation be modified to become more specific with the (solutions concrete effects of climate-change induced described further threats, during the PPG stage in the text, pending feasibility studies at PPG) Output 1.4: At least 500 ha of ecosystems restored through innovative approaches at the Protected Landscape Prokoško Lake Output 1.5: Replication triggered through incorporation of project solutions into local programmes at other sites 2. Technical Outcome 2. Financial sustainability of Output 2.1: GET 1,660,000 5,330,639 Improving Assistan targeted PAs improves, measured through: Sustainable financial ce tourism products - at least 20% reduction of the funding gap for sustainabili developed with targeted PAs; ty of community targeted - at least 1 mutually beneficial public-private support for PAs agreement (including concessions, leases, selected national through rentals) formalised and operational; IBA sites, sustainable protected caves tourism - at least 4 PAs participate in governmental and one developme tourism grant programmes; transboundary PA nt (NP Orjen) https://gefportal2.worldbank.org 5/59 5/5/2020 WbgGefportal - at least 300 people (of whom 160 are Output 2.2: Public- women) derive direct benefits from the private implementation of PA sustainable finance partnerships are in instruments; place to provide increased income - at least 20% increase in the annual number streams from legal of visitors and service users in targeted PAs. nature resource Outcome 3. Knowledge use activities (incl. management,communication, and M&E recreation) occurring in the - at least 3 knowledge products related to PA targeted PAs climate threats assessment and climate impact monitoring, PA integration into Output 2.3: sustainable tourism, and tourism Tourism and concessioning developed and disseminated recreational concessioning Other indicators will be elaborated at the PPG (and/or leasing) stage piloted in Sutjeska National Park Output 2.4: PA participation in the governmental grant programmes is ensured in a sustainable manner Output 2.5: Branding and marketing of products and services in the targeted PAs is improved Output 3.1: Knowledge products and lessons learned documented and dessiminated https://gefportal2.worldbank.org 6/59 5/5/2020 WbgGefportal through a communication strategy designed at PPG Output 3.2: Project monitoring and evaluation Sub Total ($) 2,515,000 16,530,639 Project Management Cost (PMC) GET 125,000 1,646,200 Sub Total($) 125,000 1,646,200 Total Project Cost($) 2,640,000 18,176,839 https://gefportal2.worldbank.org 7/59 5/5/2020 WbgGefportal C. Indicative sources of Co-financing for the Project by name and by type Sources of Name of Co-financier Type of Co- Investment Amount($) Co- financing Mobilized financing Governmen Ministry of Environment and Tourism of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Public Investment 1,282,600 t Investment mobilized Governmen Ministry of Environment and Tourism of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (tourism Public Investment 4,664,000 t support grants) Investment mobilized Governmen Ministry of Environment and Tourism of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina In-kind Recurrent 233,200 t expenditure s Governmen Ministry of Spatial Planning, Civil Engineering and Ecology of Republika Srpska Public Investment 4,897,200 t Investment mobilized Governmen Ministry of Spatial Planning, Civil Engineering and Ecology of Republika Srpska In-kind Recurrent 233,200 t expenditure s Governmen Ministry of Trade and Tourism of Republika Srpska Public Investment 2,565,200 t Investment mobilized Governmen Ministry of Trade and Tourism of Republika Srpska In-kind Recurrent 233,200 t expenditure s Governmen Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management of Republika Srpska Public Investment 318,318 t Investment mobilized Governmen Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Environment of Herzegovina-Neretva Canton Public Investment 1,166,000 t Investment mobilized Governmen Environmental Protection Fund FBiH Public Investment 233,200 t Investment mobilized https://gefportal2.worldbank.org 8/59 5/5/2020 WbgGefportal Governmen Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund of Republika Srpska Public Investment 233,200 t Investment mobilized Private Concessioners – preliminary discussions held with Tourism Cluster Una-Sana, Tourism Cluster Unknown Investment 116,600 Sector Herzegovina, VisitSarajevo Tourism Association, Kozara Ski Resort, and Whitewater Rafting at this mobilized stage Donor USAID, via Via Dinarica Project Grant Investment 333,000 Agency mobilized Donor Italian Development Cooperation Agency, via Via Dinarica Project Grant Investment 379,921 Agency mobilized GEF UNDP, via Via Dinarica Project Grant Investment 100,000 Agency mobilized Donor SDC, via Joint UN Programme for Disaster Risk Reduction for Sustainable Development in Bosnia Grant Investment 458,000 Agency and Herzegovina mobilized GEF UNDP, via Joint UN Programme for Disaster Risk Reduction for Sustainable Development in Bosnia Grant Investment 730,000 Agency and Herzegovina mobilized Total Project Cost($) 18,176,839 Describe how any "Investment Mobilized" was identified During the stakeholder consultations, the following major co-financing commitments were indicated: - Budgetary allocations for implementation of the Federal Environmental Strategy and Action Plan aimed at nature conservation and PA system expansion and management, and governmenet grants for Sustainable Tourism Development in FBiH – from the Ministry of Environment and Tourism of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review of the Lampreys (Petromyzontidae) in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a Current Status and Geographic Distribution
    Review of the lampreys (Petromyzontidae) in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a current status and geographic distribution Authors: Tutman, Pero, Buj, Ivana, Ćaleta, Marko, Marčić, Zoran, Hamzić, Adem, et. al. Source: Folia Zoologica, 69(1) : 1-13 Published By: Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences URL: https://doi.org/10.25225/jvb.19046 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Journal-of-Vertebrate-Biology on 13 Feb 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Journal of Open Acces Vertebrate Biology J. Vertebr. Biol. 2020, 69(1): 19046 DOI: 10.25225/jvb.19046 Review of the lampreys (Petromyzontidae) in Bosnia and Herzegovina:
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SARAJEVO WASTE WATER PROJECT Key Dates: Approved: December 22, 2009 Effective: July 15, 2010 Closing: November 30, 2015 Financing in million US Dollars:* Financier Financing Public Disclosure Authorized IBRD Loan 35.0 Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2.0 Total Project Cost 37.0 World Bank Disbursements, million US Dollars*: Total Disbursed Undisbursed IBRD Loan 35.0 1.19 33.73 * as of January, 2011. Note: Disbursements may differ from financing due to exchange rate fluctuations at the time of disbursement. Service delivery problems in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH) are compounded by the lingering after-effects of the conflict Public Disclosure Authorized that left vast portions of basic infrastructure destroyed or severely damaged. A case that vividly illustrates the problem is waste water collection and treatment in the city of Sarajevo. A Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) was built close to the confluence of the Miljacka and Bosna Rivers in the early 1980s on the occasion of the 1984 Winter Olympics. Construction of the plant was supported by the World Bank-financed Sarajevo Water Supply and Sewerage Project (Loan 1263-YU), which closed in December 1982. However, the plant was extensively damaged in the spring of 1992 at the outset of the conflict, during which the sewer network was also destroyed in various places. Since the end of the conflict in 1995, the WWTP has been largely out of commission with only minimal conservation works carried out to prevent further deterioration. As a result, virtually all of the city‟s waste water is discharged into the Miljacka and Bosna Rivers without any treatment, causing severe pollution of the rivers and impacting the communities downstream of the discharge point.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Mission of the Republic of Croatia to the International
    Permanent Mission of the Republic of Croatia EF.DEL/10/07/Corr.1 to the International Organizations in Vienna 23 January 2007 ENGLISH only Statement made by Mr. Zdravko KRMEK, State Secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management (Session IV of the 15th OSCE Economic and Environmental Forum, Vienna, 23 January 2007) Mr. Chairman, in the framework of our today's discussion I would like to stress the importance of a consultation between neighbouring states and at the regional level when combating soil degradation in the aim to avoid social problems linked to sustainable development. The Republic of Croatia, as probably a number of other states who have been part of former federations or composite states, has interesting experience in the field: rivers or river basins of internal nature are now of international character. This requires a number of interstate agreements on integral water management. One of the best examples for good cooperation on the regional level is without any doubt the Framework Agreement in Sava River Basin signed in 2003 by four countries of the Former Yugoslav Federation: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia with the participation of international partners including the Stability Pact and the OSCE. This initiative is today better known as Sava River Initiative and the first experience shows that this is a very good basis for further cooperation between these four countries. With the Republic of Slovenia there is also the Agreement of Integral Water Management, signed in 1997, as well as with Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1996. With the Republic of Montenegro a preparation of such an agreement is in final phase, as well as with the Republic of Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Drina River Basin Nexus Assessment - Phase II National Consultation Meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr
    Drina River Basin nexus assessment - Phase II National Consultation meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr. Vignesh Sridharan Dr. Francesco Gardumi 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 1 Agenda Key questions Scenarios Approach The river basin Preliminary results Hydro power plant cascade 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 2 Key questions to be addressed in Phase II • What role can renewables (hydro and non-hydro) in the Drina basin play in achieving the UNFCCC Nationally Determined Contributions? • What benefits does an increased share of non-hydro RES bring in terms of GHG emissions reduction and reduced stress on hydro power especially considering the need for flood containment measures. o To what extent may hydro power plants provide environmental services (e.g. environmental flows and flood control), and what impact does that have on their potential generation? • What are the effects of climate induced variability on hydropower generation? • What role could non-hydro RES play if the proposed plans for HPP development in the DRB are executed? • What effects can the Emission Trading Scheme, as part of the EU integration pathway, have on hydro and non-hydro RES development in the riparian countries? • In which way can hydro and non-hydro RES be impacted by the implementation of energy efficiency measures (demand- and supply-side)? 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 3 Scenarios proposed in Phase II • Reference scenario o Current policies, including INDC • Carbon pricing scenario o Effects
    [Show full text]
  • Globalna Strategija Ohranjanja Rastlinskih
    GLOBALNA STRATEGIJA OHRANJANJA RASTLINSKIH VRST (TOČKA 8) UNIVERSITY BOTANIC GARDENS LJUBLJANA AND GSPC TARGET 8 HORTUS BOTANICUS UNIVERSITATIS LABACENSIS, SLOVENIA INDEX SEMINUM ANNO 2017 COLLECTORUM GLOBALNA STRATEGIJA OHRANJANJA RASTLINSKIH VRST (TOČKA 8) UNIVERSITY BOTANIC GARDENS LJUBLJANA AND GSPC TARGET 8 Recenzenti / Reviewers: Dr. sc. Sanja Kovačić, stručna savjetnica Botanički vrt Biološkog odsjeka Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu muz. svet./ museum councilor/ dr. Nada Praprotnik Naslovnica / Front cover: Semeska banka / Seed bank Foto / Photo: J. Bavcon Foto / Photo: Jože Bavcon, Blanka Ravnjak Urednika / Editors: Jože Bavcon, Blanka Ravnjak Tehnični urednik / Tehnical editor: D. Bavcon Prevod / Translation: GRENS-TIM d.o.o. Elektronska izdaja / E-version Leto izdaje / Year of publication: 2018 Kraj izdaje / Place of publication: Ljubljana Izdal / Published by: Botanični vrt, Oddelek za biologijo, Biotehniška fakulteta UL Ižanska cesta 15, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija tel.: +386(0) 1 427-12-80, www.botanicni-vrt.si, [email protected] Zanj: znan. svet. dr. Jože Bavcon Botanični vrt je del mreže raziskovalnih infrastrukturnih centrov © Botanični vrt Univerze v Ljubljani / University Botanic Gardens Ljubljana ----------------------------------- Kataložni zapis o publikaciji (CIP) pripravili v Narodni in univerzitetni knjižnici v Ljubljani COBISS.SI-ID=297076224 ISBN 978-961-6822-51-0 (pdf) ----------------------------------- 1 Kazalo / Index Globalna strategija ohranjanja rastlinskih vrst (točka 8)
    [Show full text]
  • Euronatur Foundation Improving the Management of Hutovo Blato Nature Project Title Park CEPF GEM No
    CEPF Final Project Completion Report Instructions to grantees: please complete all fields, and respond to all questions, below. Organization Legal Name EuroNatur Foundation Improving the Management of Hutovo Blato Nature Project Title Park CEPF GEM No. 62733 Date of Report 2015-10-08 Report Author Dr. Stefan Ferger Author Contact Information [email protected]; +49 7732 9272 21 CEPF Region: Europe & Central Asia: Mediterranean Basin Strategic Direction: 3. Improve the conservation and protection status of 44 priority key biodiversity areas 3.2. Develop financial mechanisms that support protected areas while enhancing sustainable livelihood and promoting community management of priority key biodiversity areas. Grant Amount: 194908.00 USD Project Dates: Start Date: 2013/6/1; End Date: 2015/5/31, prolonged to 2015/8/31 1. Implementation Partners for this Project (list each partner and explain how they were involved in the project) - Hutovo Blato Nature Park - local park management authority, ultimate beneficiary of the project, participated in each component and was responsible for the efficiency of the ranger service and the distribution of the salaries among the rangers (supervised and controlled by EuroNatur) - Nase ptice, national NGO with office in Sarajevo and strong expertise in the fields of bird conservation (especially water birds and waders) and environmental education. Nase ptice was the local partner in charge of the majority of our project activities and at the same time supervised and guided the local NGO Ljapa nasa. - Ljepa Nasa is a regional NGO based in Čapljina with profound knowledge about the Nature Park, its natural values, socio-economic situation of local communities, the park´s difficulties, challenges and history.
    [Show full text]
  • European Social Charter the Government of Bosnia And
    16/06/2021 RAP/RCha/BIH/11 (2021) EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER 11th National Report on the implementation of the European Social Charter submitted by THE GOVERNMENT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Articles 11, 12, 13, 14 and 23 of the European Social Charter for the period 01/01/2016 – 31/12/2019 Report registered by the Secretariat on 16 June 2021 CYCLE 2021 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND REFUGEES THE ELEVENTH REPORT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER /REVISED/ GROUP I: HEALTH, SOCIAL SECURITY AND SOCIAL PROTECTION ARTICLES 11, 12, 13, 14 AND 23 REFERENCE PERIOD: JANUARY 2016 - DECEMBER 2019 SARAJEVO, SEPTEMBER 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 3 II. ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ........... 4 III. GENERAL LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................................... 5 1. Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................................................................................... 5 2. Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................................................... 5 3. Republika Srpska ........................................................................................................... 9 4. Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina .............................................................. 10 IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF RATIFIED ESC/R/ PROVISIONS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Memory Practices of the Memorial Complex at Mrakovica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Manuela BRENNER The Construction, De- and Reconstruction of History and Memory: Local Memory Practices of the Memorial Complex at Mrakovica, Bosnia and Herzegovina THE CONSTRUCTION, DE- AND RECONSTRUCTION OF HISTORY AND MEMORY: LOCAL MEMORY PRACTICES OF THE MEMORIAL COMPLEX AT MRAKOVICA, BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Manuela BRENNER University of Regensburg UDK: 069(497.6 Mrakovica):94(4)“1941/1945“ 069(497.6 Mrakovica:355(497.6)“1992/1995“ Prethodno priopćenje Primljeno: 07.10.2013. Prihvaćeno: 05.01.2014. This paper examines the memory practices of the memorial complex at Mrakovica at the Kozara National Park in the Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The original concept of the memorial site, founded in 1972, was to keep the Kozara-epos alive. The erected monument, the memorial wall and the museum were built to remember one of the biggest battles during the Second World War on Yugoslav soil during which more than ten thousand Partisan fighters and civilians lost their lives. During the communist era the memorial site fit into the official memory frame: the high number of casualties, especially civilians, was put into the foreground and the Partisans in their struggle for liberation were glorified. The key component of the official narrative was the slogan brotherhood and unity. After the armed conflict in the 1990s, the site underwent several transformations. New memorial frames were set by nationalists; thus history and memory were thereby de- and reconstructed. The new narrative included not only victims of the Second World War but exclusively those victims belonging to the ethnic group of Serbs of the First World War and the conflict in 1992-95.
    [Show full text]
  • Tara-Drina National Park
    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin
    Confluence of Lim River and Drina River, Republika Srpska, Bosnia & Herzegovina Summary of key facts related to HPPs in country reports Belgrade, January 25, 2016 Outlook on presentation • Electricity generation and consumption structure in Serbia • High voltage grid in Serbia • General situation of hydropower in Drina river basin • Existing hydropower plants in Drina river basin • Conceivable hydropower plants in Drina river basin • Recommendations 2 Production and consumption in Serbia 2010 2030 Production Consumption 3 Production and consumption in Bosnia 2010 2030 Consumption Origin of electricity 4 Production and consumption in Montenegro 2010 2030 Origin of electricity Consumption 5 High voltage grids Serbia Bosnia & Herzegovina Montenegro - Max. 400 kV - Max. 400 kV - Max. 400 kV - Ring structure - No ring structure - No ring structure - 6 links to foreign grids - 30 links to foreign grids - 11 links to foreign grids 6 Existing HPPs in Drina river basin SAVA 9 HPPs existing in Drina river basin DRINA CEHOTINA UVAC TARA PIVA LIM 7 Potential HPPs in Drina river basin 37 HPPs conceivably developable in Drina river basin 8 Existing / potential HPPs in Drina river basin Existing HPPs Conceivable HPPs BiH 1 + 2 BiH 9 + 7 Montenegro 1 Montenegro 17 Serbia 5 + 2 Serbia 4 + 7 Total 9 Total 37 1’964 MW Planned HPPs BiH 9 + 7 Montenegro 6 Serbia 3 + 7 Total 25 1’494 MW +76% power 9 Serbia – Present / conceivable HPPs • 2015: 7 HPPs in operation Total = 1’289 MW - Drina River : 2 HPPs Zvornik (96 MW), Bajina Basta HPP (368 MW) *) - Uvac River : 3 HPPs Radoinja (103 MW), Kokin Brod (21 MW), Uvac (36 MW) - Lim River : 1 HPPPotpeć (51 MW) - Pumped-storage PP Bajina Basta PSPP (614 MW) Environmental flow Up to 60 m3/s • 10 projects of new HPPs Total power 781 MW Total cost Ca.
    [Show full text]