Public-Health-Supplement-Law-Web-Final.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public-Health-Supplement-Law-Web-Final.Pdf ARTICLE IN PRESS Public Health (]]]]) ], ]]] www.elsevierhealth.com/journals/pubh Preface In 1988, one of my predecessors as Chief Medical Richard Coker and Robyn Martin have, by bringing Officer, Sir Donald Acheson, wrote that in England together public health and legal experts, addressed there is a ‘lack of clarity about the role and in this series of papers the complex problems that responsibilities in this field [of public health law] arise when government regulates to prevent injury which derives from the complexity of the legisla- and disease or to promote the public’s health. In tion and from a misunderstanding about its inter- doing so they, along with their colleagues, cause us pretation. The Public Health Acts comprise a to reflect on the nature, scope and purpose of complex body of legislation stretching back for public health law as well as the evidence base that more than a century. It is difficult to gain a informs judgments. coherent view of what is intended.’ In my 2002 strategy for infectious diseases in The state’s framing and application of public England, Getting Ahead of the Curve,Isuggested health laws reflect the contemporary balance that there was a need to review legislation on between the rights of the state, of society, and of infectious diseases in England with a view to individuals. And this balance changes, as does modernizing it. This review is currently ongoing. This our knowledge of public health, disease, and how valuable collection of papers and the commentaries our environment affects our health. The Public that accompany them form a powerful resource from Health Acts to which Sir Donald referred were which I, my colleagues in the Department of Health, framed in the 19th century and based upon 19th public health professionals, and lawyers with an century mores and 19th century scientific knowl- interest in public health can draw inspiration. These edge. papers highlight the fundamental role that the law Public health law is a fascinating and sometimes plays in securing public health. controversial field, highlighting as it does social and political tensions, and the perennial balancing act of protecting individual liberties whilst securing Chief Medical Officer for England public well-being. It is, therefore, surprising that so Sir Liam Donaldson few contemporary scholars have researched the Department of Health, Room 107 Richmond House, potential for law as a tool for the protection and 79 Whitehall, London SWIA 2NS, UK improvement of public health. E-mail address: [email protected] 0033-3506/$ - see front matter & 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Institute of Public Health. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2006.07.004 ARTICLE IN PRESS Public Health (]]]]) ], ]]]–]]] www.elsevierhealth.com/journals/pubh Editorial Introduction: The importance of law for public health policy and practice Background tion of public health law research, and has resulted in insufficient institutional capacity to respond to In 2005, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical the needs of public health professionals and policy Medicine in association with the Centre for Re- makers. This lecture series was an attempt to search in Primary and Community Care, and address this gap by highlighting a number of with the support of the Nuffield Trust, organized challenging and pressing contemporary areas of and hosted a series of lectures on Public Health public health and law overlap, with the objectives Law. This initiative, which attracted considerable of provoking constructive critical debate and of interest and attention from public health profes- identifying areas that will benefit from further sionals, lawyers, legislators, and policy makers, research and analysis. addressed a number of contemporary public If law is to be an effective tool for the public health themes. Each lecture was followed by health, then it must be framed on an evidence base audience discussion and later, at the Nuffield Trust, derived from public health law research. Public a smaller audience was invited to discuss issues health laws, the principles upon which they are raised in the lecture. A rapporteur with expertise founded and the legal framework of public health in the lecture subject was invited at the Nuffield practice need to be understood by a professional Trust discussion to reflect on the lecture, to lead audience, including public health policy makers, the discussion, and to summarize the debate in a legislators, public health practitioners and lawyers brief commentary. This publication contains working in the field. The United Kingdom, as other the collection of this series of lectures and states, needs to establish a body of scholarship on commentaries. the role of law in public health. This lecture series At the 2005 United Kingdom Health Protection explored the potential of law as a tool for the Agency conference, Rod Griffiths, president of the public health. Most of the contributors would not Faculty of Public Health, identified two profes- claim to have expertise in public health law as sional areas that demanded attention from the such. Rather they come from a wide range of areas public health profession: leadership and public of law and public health, and they were given the health law. Most law taught in the field of health brief of exploring the extent to which their own is focused not upon population perspectives but on area of expertise could be used for the benefit of individualized medical law. Following high profile the public health (in the case of the law con- media interest in rare cases involving difficult tributors), or of exploring the extent to which law medical decision-making (such as the separation might contribute to policy, practice, and public of conjoined twins, voluntary euthanasia or the health outcomes (in the case of the public health allocation of fertility treatment services) there is contributors). now a proliferation of centres for medical law, As a preliminary introduction to the public health medical policy and medical ethics in the UK and law lecture series, this first contribution examines elsewhere. We would contend that this focus has the evolution of law’s involvement in public health, served to distort the importance of medical law to in order to set the scene for the more focused the detriment of public health law, with conse- examinations of the role of law in public health to quent implications for the funding and dissemina- follow. 0033-3506/$ - see front matter & 2006 The Royal Institute of Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2006.07.005 ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 Editorial The development of public health law authorities which have responsibility for the ex- ercise of public health powers. The importance of law as a tool for the protection Britain played a leading role on the world stage in of the public health in England was recognized well its recognition that law could provide powers and before the practice of medicine engaged with duties which would underpin strategies aimed at systemic approaches to illness and disease.1 From securing population health. Because of its impor- early times laws have been passed to provide tance in the development of processes of indus- powers necessary to counter health threats such as trialization and its high concentrations of poor sanitation, the adulteration of food, the population, Britain faced occupational and envir- health consequences of child labour and the onmental health threats before other nations, and epidemic spread of disease. Indeed many laws so needed to find ways of controlling the adverse pre-date modern scientific causal paradigms. These effects of its industries. Early English public health early laws were included in the powers of police to legislation became a model for legal regulation of secure law and order, in recognition that it was the public health harms in other states, and much of mandate of the state to protect its citizens from the world has a public health legal framework physical harm, including a duty to protect against which owes its jurisprudence to these early British health harms. attempts to use law for the benefit of public It was not until the late 18th century that health. medical officers began to play a part in government Scientific understanding was being transformed efforts to address in an organized endeavour the at the time of these first statutes. Knowledge health concerns of urban living. After the influenza around the role of microbes in disease causation and typhoid epidemics in 1837 and 1838, it was a was emerging and the importance of disease linked lawyer not a doctor, Edwin Chadwick, who was to waste, poor systems of drainage and refuse was asked by the British government to carry out an recognized. The legal mechanism applied to control enquiry into the causes of disease. His Report on disease was the old common law device of the legal the Sanitary Conditions of the Labouring Popula- nuisance, such that disease sources were classified tion of Great Britain, published in 1842, argued as statutory nuisances. Statutory classification of a that disease was directly related to living condi- disease source as a nuisance brought into play a tions and that coordinated measures should be range of legal duties and powers, enabling removal, taken to protect health by means of disease control and licensing of threats to public health. As prevention. In 1848 the term ‘public health’ was medical science developed to recognize new first used in legislation, when a Central Board of sources of disease, so responses to these new Health was established with powers to oversee sources of disease were either incorporated into street cleansing, rubbish collection, water supply the main public health acts or made subject of 4 and systems of sewerage.2 Even then, legislation separate, parallel legislation, with the end result was regional in application.
Recommended publications
  • Evolution and Gestalt of the State in the United Kingdom
    Martin Loughlin Evolution and Gestalt of the state in the United Kingdom Book section (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Originally published in: Cassese, Sabino, von Bogdandy, Armin and Huber, Peter, (eds.) The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law: The Administrative State. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017 © 2017 Oxford University Press This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/81516/ Available in LSE Research Online: June 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Ius Publicum Europaeum: The Max Planck Handbook of European Public Law Vol. I: Public Law and Public Authority § 15: United Kingdom Martin Loughlin Outline 1. INTRODUCTION 2. STATE 2.1. Introduction 2.2. State formation 2.3. The Crown, the Government and the Body Politic 2.4. Crown Prerogatives 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health the Vision and the Challenge
    THE ROCK CARLING FELLOWSHIP 1997 Public Health The vision and the challenge THE ROCK CARLING FELLOWSHIP 1997 PUBLIC HEALTH The vision and the challenge The pursuit of public health can have no finality... The problems of public health are changing rapidly with increasing medical knowledge and changes in social and economic conditions, the age distribution of the population and the outlook of the people. Sixth Annual Report of the Department of Health for Scotland 1934 Walter W Holland CBE, FRCP, FFPHM LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science London AND Susie Stewart DL, MA, HON MFPHM Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow Glasgow Published by The Nuffield Trust 59 New Cavendish Street, London WIM 7RD ISBN 1-902089-10-3 © Nuffield Trust 1998 Publications Committee Sir Derek Mitchell, KCB, cvo Professor John Ledingham, DM, FRCP John Wyn Owen, CB Designed by Benjamin Rowntree Reports Limited PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY BIDDLES & CO The Rock Carling Fellowship commemorates the late Sir Ernest Rock Carling for many years a governing Trustee and Chairman of the Medical Advisory Committee of the Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust. It was stipulated that each holder of the Fellowship will seek to review in a monograph the state of knowledge and activity in one of the fields in which Sir Ernest had been particularly interested, and which is within the purposes of the Trust. The arrangements provide that the monograph will be introduced by a public lecture given at a recognised Medical Teaching Centre in the United
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Act, 1961 9 & 10 Eliz
    Public Health Act, 1961 9 & 10 ELiz. 2 CH. 64 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I GENERAL Section 1. Construction. 2. Interpretation. 3. Extent. PART II SANITATION AND BUILDINGS Building regulations -1. Power to make building regulations. 5. Application to building regulations of statutory provisions concerning building byelaws. 6. Relaxation of building regulations. 7. Appeal against refusal by local authority to relax building regulations. 8. Advertisement of proposal to relax building regulations. 9. Consultation with Building Regulations Advisory Committee and other bodies. 10. Minor amendments. 11. Building regulations : transitionals and consequential amend- ments. Sewers, drains and sanitary conveniences 12. Contribution to cost of sewering highway. 13. Contribution to cost of sewer in land subsequently laid out as street. 14. Evasion of liability to contribute under two last foregoing sections. 15. Recovery of cost of maintaining public sewers. 16. Examination and testing of drains. 17. Summary power to remedy stopped-up drains. 18. Power to repair drains and private sewers. A CH. 64 Public Health Act, 1961 9 & 10 ELIZ. 2 Section 19. Disconnection of drains. 20. Fine for improper construction or repair of water closets or soil pipes. 21. Closet accommodation for separate dwellings. 22. Power to cleanse or repair drains. 23. Loan of temporary sanitary conveniences. Buildings and structures 24. Section 58 of Public Health Act, 1936, to apply to buildings constituting a danger to persons in streets. 25. Emergency measures to deal with dangerous buildings. 26. Defective premises. 27. Ruinous and dilapidated buildings and neglected sites. 28. New building overreaching adjacent chimneys. 29. Powers of local authority in relation to demolitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolishing the Crime of Public Nuisance and Modernising That of Public Indecency
    International Law Research; Vol. 6, No. 1; 2017 ISSN 1927-5234 E-ISSN 1927-5242 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Abolishing the Crime of Public Nuisance and Modernising That of Public Indecency Graham McBain1,2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: November 20, 2016 Accepted: February 19, 2017 Online Published: March 7, 2017 doi:10.5539/ilr.v6n1p1 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v6n1p1 1. INTRODUCTION Prior articles have asserted that English criminal law is very fragmented and that a considerable amount of the older law - especially the common law - is badly out of date.1 The purpose of this article is to consider the crime of public nuisance (also called common nuisance), a common law crime. The word 'nuisance' derives from the old french 'nuisance' or 'nusance' 2 and the latin, nocumentum.3 The basic meaning of the word is that of 'annoyance';4 In medieval English, the word 'common' comes from the word 'commune' which, itself, derives from the latin 'communa' - being a commonality, a group of people, a corporation.5 In 1191, the City of London (the 'City') became a commune. Thereafter, it is usual to find references with that term - such as common carrier, common highway, common council, common scold, common prostitute etc;6 The reference to 'common' designated things available to the general public as opposed to the individual. For example, the common carrier, common farrier and common innkeeper exercised a public employment and not just a private one.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Act, 1945. 8 & 9 GEO
    Water Act, 1945. 8 & 9 GEO. 6. CE. 42. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART I. CENTRAL AND LOCAL PLANNING. Section. i. Duty of Minister in relation to water. 2. Central Advisory Water Committee. 3. Joint Advisory Water Committees. 4. Duties of Joint Advisory Water Committees. 5. Power to require local authorities and statutory water under- takers to carry out surveys and formulate proposals. 6. Power of Minister to require records and information from persons abstracting water. 7. Facilities for obtaining information as to underground water. PART II. LOCAL ORGANISATION OF WATER SUPPLIES. 8. Joint water boards. 9. Combination of undertakers and transfer of undertakings by agreement or compulsorily. io. Variation of limits of supply by agreement or compulsorily. ii. Power of Minister to authorise certain statutory water undertakers to supply premises outside their limits of supply. 12. Supply of water in bulk by agreement or compulsorily. 13. Default powers of Minister. PART III. RESOURCES. CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION OF WATER waste certain 14. Control of abstraction and prevention of in areas. 15. Agreements as to drainage, etc., of land. use of hosepipes. 16. Power to prohibit or restrict temporarily of 17. Byelaws for preventing waste, misuse or contamination water. A CH. 42. Water Act, 1945. 8 & 9 GEO. 6. Section. 18. Byelaws for preventing pollution of water of undertakers. 19. General provisions as to byelaws. 2o. Power of Minister to require the making of byelaws, to make byelaws in case of default and to revoke byelaws. 21. Penalty for polluting water used for human consumption. 22. Acquisition of land and execution of works for protection of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority Byelaws
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 01817, 1 March 2016 By Mark Sandford Local authority byelaws Inside: 1. Introduction 2. Making byelaws 3. Confirming authorities 4. Reform of byelaw procedure: England 5. Reform of byelaw procedure: Wales www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 01817, 1 March 2016 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Making byelaws 6 2.1 The purposes of byelaws 6 2.2 The original procedure 6 2.3 The new procedure 7 2.4 Model byelaws 8 3. Confirming authorities 9 3.1 Byelaws falling within DCLG’s responsibility 9 3.2 DEFRA 10 3.3 Department for Transport 10 3.4 DCMS 10 3.5 Department of Health 10 3.6 Home Office 11 4. Reform of byelaw procedure: England 12 4.1 Policy background to the 2015 reforms 12 4.2 Proposed new arrangements under the Labour government 12 4.3 Coalition Government proposals 13 5. Reform of byelaw procedure: Wales 15 Contributing Authors: Mark Sandford Cover page image copyright: Other mechanical contrivances by Tim Green. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Local authority byelaws Summary Local authorities and certain other bodies have powers under various Acts of Parliament to make byelaws, which are essentially local laws designed to deal with local issues. At present, byelaws must be approved by central government before they can be brought into force. Their revocation also requires the intervention of central government and they are enforced through the magistrates’ courts. Powers over byelaw procedure are devolved to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Safety at Work Etc Act 1974 Page 1
    Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 Page 1 1 of 102 DOCUMENTS: UK Legislation (Health and Safety)/UK Parliament Statutes/Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (1974 c 37) TOPIC SEARCH CATEGORIES: Legal duties; Managing health and safety; Employers; Managers; Public; Safety representatives Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 1974 CHAPTER 37 An Act to make further provision for securing the health, safety and welfare of persons at work, for protecting others against risks to health or safety in con- nection with the activities of persons at work, for controlling the keeping and use and preventing the unlawful acquisition, possession and use of dangerous substances, and for controlling certain emissions into the atmosphere; to make further provision with respect to the employment medical advisory service; to amend the law relating to building regulations, and the Building (Scotland) Act 1959; and for connected purposes [31st July 1974] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Par- liament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:- 2 of 102 DOCUMENTS: UK Legislation (Health and Safety)/UK Parliament Statutes/Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (1974 c 37)/Part I Health, Safety and Welfare in Connection with Work, and Control of Dangerous Substances and Certain Emissions into the Atmosphere/1 Preliminary Part I Health, Safety and Welfare in Connection with Work, and Control of Dangerous Substances and Certain
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 02 April 2020
    Changes to legislation: Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 02 April 2020. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 1984 CHAPTER 22 An Act to consolidate certain enactments relating to the control of disease and to the establishment and functions of port health authorities, including enactments relating to burial and cremation and to the regulation of common lodging–houses and canal boats, with amendments to give effect to recommendations of the Law Commission. [26th June1984] Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act extended (with modifications) (coming into force in accordance with art. 1 of the amending S.I.) by S.I. 1994/1405, art. 7 (as amended (2.1.2008) by Channel Tunnel (International Arrangements and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Amendment) Order 2007 (S.I. 2007/3579), art. 3(c) and (16.4.2015) by Channel Tunnel (International Arrangements) and Channel Tunnel (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Amendment) Order 2015 (S.I. 2015/856), arts. 1, 6) Act (except s.28 and the treasury function under s. 73(4)): transfer of functions (1.7.1999) by S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLAND, 1831-1875 Presented to the Graduate Council of the North
    N, 1'%,6ABI THE PUBLIC HEALTH MOVEMENT IN VICTORIAN ENGLAND, 1831-1875 THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Renee Anderson Hopkins, B.A. Denton, Texas December, 1985 .0-"/,C7 Hopkins, Renee A., The Public Health Movement in Victorian England, 1831-1875. Master of Arts (History), December, 1985, 73 pp., bibliography, 60 titles. In early Victorian England, a coalition of men of Gov- ernment and the local community established a centralized and uniform policy toward public health. The long and ar- duous campaign (1831-1875) for public health impelled the need to solve the serious social, political and economic problems spawned by the Industrial Revolution. This study concludes that Britain's leaders came to believe that Government indeed had an obligation to redress grievances created by injustice, a decision which meant the rejection of laissez-faire. Through legislation based on long study, Parliament consolidated the work of sanitation authorities, trained medical officers, and essential environmental improvements. The public sanitation program soon decreased the mortality rate by breaking the frequent cycle of cholera, typhoid, typhus, and dysentery plagues, all this notwithstanding that no doctor of that age knew that bacteria and viruses caused disease. -MNW.. PREFACE The Public Health Movement of Victorian England stemmed from the social, economic and political problems created by industrialization. Unprecedented social change focused attention on such issues as poverty, public health, working conditions, and education. By mid-century, govern- ment involvement in social affairs had begotten a plethora of recommendations on how to rid England of these social evils, especially the improvement of public sanitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernising English Criminal Legislation 1267-1970
    Public Administration Research; Vol. 6, No. 1; 2017 ISSN 1927-517x E-ISSN 1927-5188 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Modernising English Criminal Legislation 1267-1970 Graham McBain1,2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: April 2, 2017 Accepted: April 19, 2017 Online Published: April 27, 2017 doi:10.5539/par.v6n1p53 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/par.v6n1p53 1. INTRODUCTION English criminal - and criminal procedure - legislation is in a parlous state. Presently, there are some 286 Acts covering criminal law and criminal procedure with the former comprising c.155 Acts. Therefore, it is unsurprising that Judge CJ, in his book, The Safest Shield (2015), described the current volume of criminal legislation as 'suffocating'. 1 If one considers all legislation extant from 1267 - 1925 (see Appendix A) a considerable quantity comprises criminal law and criminal procedure - most of which is (likely) obsolete.2 Given this, the purpose of this article is to look at criminal legislation in the period 1267-1970 as well as criminal procedure legislation in the period 1267-1925. Its conclusions are simple: (a) the Law Commission should review all criminal legislation pre-1890 as well as a few pieces thereafter (see Appendix B). It should also review (likely) obsolete common law crimes (see Appendix C); (b) at the same time, the Ministry of Justice (or Home Office) should consolidate all criminal legislation post-1890 into 4 Crime Acts.3 These should deal with: (a) Sex crimes; (b) Public order crimes; (c) Crimes against the person; (d) Property and financial crimes (see 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing 5: Marine Leisure and Recreation
    Marine leisure and recreation Coastal recreation has undergone an unprecedented period of change in recent years, with increasing numbers of people taking up water-borne activities. The attraction of the coast for recreation may be attributed to its scenic quality, its wilderness appeal, the availability of space and the relative lack of control and regulation compared to some inland waterwaysi. Since the opportunity for coastal recreation is largely determined by the physical nature of the resource base, the majority of management approaches have been taken at the local level. This is evident in attempts to ‘control’ recreational activities for nature conservation purposes and to resolve conflicts between different user groups. A number of statutory and non-statutory approaches have been employed: zoning, speed controls, access allocation, facility provision, development controls, pricing mechanism, permits, equipment and quota controls, and codes of behaviourii. Where voluntary action or self- regulation is not practicable, or has proved ineffective at site level, byelaws have been widely applied to manage recreational impacts on the coast. There is little, if any, guiding primary legislation, other than that which applies to the protection of public health and access to the countryside. For example, at the European level the Bathing Water Directive (BWD) is concerned with public health protection from faecal pollution of bathing waters, and this has been transposed in England and Wales by the Water Resources Act 1991, the Bathing Waters (Classification) Regulations 1991 and the associated directions and notices. Byelaw-making powers are also available to local authorities under the Public Health Acts and the Countryside Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Act 1984 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 17 September 2021
    Changes to legislation: Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 17 September 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 1984 CHAPTER 22 An Act to consolidate certain enactments relating to the control of disease and to the establishment and functions of port health authorities, including enactments relating to burial and cremation and to the regulation of common lodging–houses and canal boats, with amendments to give effect to recommendations of the Law Commission. [26th June1984] Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act extended (with modifications) (coming into force in accordance with art. 1 of the amending S.I.) by S.I. 1994/1405, art. 7 (as amended (2.1.2008) by Channel Tunnel (International Arrangements and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Amendment) Order 2007 (S.I. 2007/3579), art. 3(c) and (16.4.2015) by Channel Tunnel (International Arrangements) and Channel Tunnel (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Amendment) Order 2015 (S.I. 2015/856), arts. 1, 6) Act (except s.28 and the treasury function under s. 73(4)): transfer of functions (1.7.1999) by S.I.
    [Show full text]