<<

1eman• orts January., 1959 New York Without Papers

Report of the Strilie Effects

The Pursuit of Journalism Thomas Griffith

Glance Backward at the Press Louis M. Lyons

Neglected Opportunities E. W. Kieckhefer

All the Views Fit to Print Bruce Grant

Our Nervous Press and its Nervous Critics Charles E. Higbie

Education for Journalism in the U. S. Norval Neil Luxon

Why Should News Come in 5-Minute Packages? Edward R. Murrow

"Lost" Art of Humor Elizabeth Green

Reviews - Scrapbook - Nieman Notes 2 NIEMAN REPORTS funny news story side-splitting. But, such as it is, the editorial paragraph is being produced today not only by an NiemanReports individualist like Harry Golden, the editor of the Carolina Israelite, but also by anonymous hands in many parts of the country. As to the quality of the contemporary product, per­ . Nieman Reports is published by the Nieman Alumni Council. P1ers Anderton, ; Barry Brown, Providence, R. I.; haps the comment on Independence Day by the Lake Coun­ John L. Dougherty, Rochester; Thomas H. Griffith New York ty Banner of Tiptonville, Tennessee (as quoted in Hillier City; A. B. Guthrie, Jr., Great Falls, Mont.; John M. Harrison, Krieghbaum's Facts in Perspective) is apposite: "The fourth Iowa City; Weldon James, Louisville, Ky.; Francis P. Locke Dayton,~.; Frederick W. Maguire, Columbus, 0.; W. F. McllwaU:, of July isn't and never was what it used to be." G:trden C1t!, N. Y.; Harry T. Montgomery, New York City; Fred­ There seem to me two good reasons for the odds against enc~ W. Pillsbury, ; Charlotte F. Robling, Norwalk, Conn.; finding many of these short bits that will "set the Geigers D':"1ght E. Sargent, Portland, Me.; Kenneth Stewart, Ann Arbor, M1ch.; John Strohmeyer, Bethlehem, Pa.; Walter H. Waggoner, chattering." The first is clearly implied in the final phrase Th~ Hague, Netherlands; Melvin S. Wax, Chicago; Lawrence G. of Stephen Leacock's definition of humor quoted by Pro­ We1ss, Boulder, Colo.; Louis M. Lyons, Cambridge, Chairman. fessor Zeisler, "the kindly contemplation of the incongrui­ Published quarterly from 44 Holyoke House Cambridge 38 Mass. Subscription $3 a year. Entered as second~lass matter De: ties of life, artistically expressed." How many writers of cember 31, 1947, at the post office at Boston, Massachusetts, un­ editorial paragraphs, no matter how gifted, have time to der the Act of March 3, 1879. polish their phrases? Surely most of the composing in this VOL. XIII; NO.1 JANUARY, 1959 form is squeezed into the midst of regular assignments in other genres. Will Rogers learned to polish his pithy phrases not in a city room but on the vaudeville stage, The "Lost" Art where he could test the ring of a good joke night after night By Elizabeth Green before a succession of audiences. Among the contemporary writers who manage to write No more humor? The snows of yesteryear with style, in spite of deadline pressures, I have particularly have certainly melted, but I am surprised to find Professor en)oyed John Crosby, John Gould, and the late Rudolph Zeisler in Nieman Reports (July, 1958) succumbing to this Ehe. I know that one man's joke is another man's bromide particular form of nostalgia. I wonder if his journalism stu­ and that it would be futile to try to coax a laugh from any­ dents weren't hunting in the wrong place. If they concen­ one who is not amused by Gould's dissection of statistics in trated only on editorial paragraphs, they overlooked what rural life. and the prose of government reports on agricul­ se~m to me the best sources of contemporary newspaper ture, or diverted by Crosby's rendering of Madison Avenue­ Wlt. ese and his scenarios for spectaculars. But what about the I assume that Professor Zeisler was commenting on qual­ leading editorial pages of the country? Like some column­ ity, not quantity, when he said: "The onetime lapidary art ists and critics, the best editorial writers take time and of the paragrapher is lost." On the July day when I read thought over their words and often choose irony for their his lament, without any "research" whatever I found eight weapon. Regular examination of the editorial columns of or ten instances of the form in the current issues of our ~he St. Louis Post-Dispatch and , for ~ocal daily, the Holyoke Transcript-Telegram, which orig­ mstance, oug~t in the course of time to yield something mates some of its editorial paragraphs and clips others. that seems wltty to readers of diverse tastes. In .the Kansas City Star, Bill Vaughan was commenting There is another reason, also unrelated to the talent of on highway architecture where "the structure moderne is the a~thors, why hunting through the quick quips for either a frozen custard stand or a bank, and the gracious endunng humor sounds to me like dreary work. The pre­ ol~ m~sion is either a tourist home or a funeral parlor." A tensions and follies which a good local newspaper attacks Missoun weekly suggested: "Maybe if you had to pass an should be local and immediate; the point may well escape examination and get a license in order to walk it would be the reader at a distance, no matter how deft the turn of as popular with the youngsters as driving is." The Cleve­ phrase. Students from Michigan who might have been land Plain Dealer defined in verse the ultimate cigarette: combing the Holyoke Transcript-Telegram a couple of Ah, my lads, at last they've built her­ years ago would probably have looked sourly at the pro­ No tobacco-just all filter. posal, ascribed to a linotype operator, that the four western If Professor Zeisler objects that these are not funny, I will c?unties of Massachusetts ought to secede and join Connec­ not argue; indeed, I did not find even his instances of the ticut. The aptness of this suggestion would have been ap­ Elizabeth Green is publicity director at Mount Holyoke parent only to an inhabitant of these remoter areas of the College. (Continued on Page 22) NIEMAN REPORTS 3 The Pursuit of Journalism By Thomas Griffith

For literature, said Max Beerbohm, he felt reverence, but often inadequate, ignorance would not be preferable. Jour­ for journalism merely a kind regard. A natural remark to nalism's desire to reconstruct the world anew each day, to come from a man with his feet in both camps and his heart find a serviceable coherence and continuity in chaos, may in one. Journalism has always had a hard time of it among be a losing game and is always an artificial one: it is circum­ the literary, particularly among those who had to grub in scribed by the amount of information available, limited at it in · order to afford writing what they wanted to write, times by the journalist's lack of imagination and weakened which society treated as a luxury when for them it was at other times by his excess of it. Yet it has its own uses, necessity. Literature, said Ezra Pound, is news that staxs even when set against history. news. And dictionaries have, at least until lately, defined The historian is often thought to be less scandal-minded journalistic as a style "characterized by evidences of haste, than the journalist, but with an intimate diary in hand that superficiality of thought, inaccuracies of detail, colloquial­ has later come to light, and with a freedom from libel that a isms, and sensationalisms." Matthew Arnold thought journ­ journalist never has, he may often be blunter. A historian alism "literature in a hurry." The difficulty lies, I think, in is also thought to be more impartial, but must guard against regarding journalism as a kind of failed literature, where­ imposing upon the past a pattern of interpretations he is as it aspires to be literature only insofar as it would like to fond of, while a journalist must write to people in the know­ be well-written, and aspires to be history only insofar as it ing present, suspicious of his flights of interpretation which seeks to be accurate. Andre Gide was severer, but closer, do not match their own awareness of . At the very when he wrote "I call journalism everything that will be least the historian must be conscious of the occupational less interesting tomorrow than today." For the essence of vice of retroactive superiority: he is like a privileged specta­ journalism is its timeliness; it must be served hot. tor at a horse race in the past who alone knows which horse Journalism is in fact history on the run. It is history writ­ went on to win, and looking about him wonders why men ten in time to be acted upon: thereby not only recording of seeming intelligence are making such bad bets, or getting events but at times influencing them. This explains its so worked up over what will not turn out as they expect. A temptation to passion and its besetting sin of partisanship. reader of history must make the effort of imagination to Journalism is also the recording of history while the facts realize that though he knows the outcome, the participants are not all in. Yet any planner of battles knows the eternal did not; what has become a finality (and may even conflict between needing to know enough to act, and need­ have been, as a later era sees, inevitable) was not so regarded ing to act in time: a: problem in journalism as in diplomacy then, or if anticipated, may have been considered as still in and warfare. Adolescents and second-rate poets who special­ doubt, and as something to be resisted, delayed or forestall­ ize in large misstatements often tell us that life is chaos, but ed. Viewed forward, as decisions that had to be confronted, if life were only that there would be no such thing as mon­ history can be as exciting as the best journalism; viewed otony; life includes both the world we know (which, if we backward, as mechanically determined, history becomes do not fully understand or appreciate, we are at least not sur­ dull, and its actors mere marionettes who did not have the prised by) and the unwinding of the unpredictable. It is the wisdom (really only the information) of the historian who function of journalism-daily, in the case of a newspaper, sits in later judgment. These are some of the difficulties of weekly in a magazine-to add up the latest unpredictable history, to be set against its advantages of greater informa­ events and relate them to the familiar. Not a judgment for tion, knowledge of 'how it turned out' and leisure to reflect. history, for too many facts emerge later, but an estimate I do not intend to demean history to exalt journalism, or to for now, from the known; and it is a function essential make each of equal worth where they are not, but only to in a democracy. If journalism is sometimes inaccurate and elbow a proper place for journalism as a trade not alone in its disabilities or in its values.

His commentary on a trade that he took to, naturally, As long ago as my first course in journalism at college, this is from Thomas Griffith's forthcoming book, The my professor set as a theme for us to write whether we Waist-High Culture, to be published by Harper's this Win­ thought journalism to be a game, a racket or a profession. ter. A Nieman Fellow in 1943, Mr. Griffith is a senior editor With that instinctive cunning which settles quickly on stu­ of Time, Inc. dents at examination time, I could see that to defend journal- 4 NIEMAN REPORTS ism as a profession (which one part of me wanted to be­ baseball fan, a heckler of plays that he himself could not lieve, and still does) was to invite mockery; of course it was have equaled. He must cultivate skepticism while avoiding not exclusively a racket, so I wrote of it as a game. But I cynicism. He must learn to cover people, meetings and would have been happy then, and content now, to describe causes for which he can have sympathy but must not dis­ it as a craft. A newspaper editor friend of mine once told play loyalty: he must learn to feel but not engage. He must me that he thought most people fell into their occupations be incorruptible, the temptation to be otherwise comes not by chance, but that men choose to join the circus, work on from bribery, which is rare, but from a reluctance to pursue a railroad or enter newspapering. Fresh out of journalism that kind of news which will go against the grain of his school and full of exalted notions that I could see had to be paper's views or his own convictions (it takes courage to unlearned, I liked his comparison for being down to earth. give unpopular causes their due). He must be swift while Journalism may be as much in need of principles as medi­ also considered. He must go where he is not wanted, and cine or law (I believe this to be true) ; but without anything be resistant to those who are too welcoming. And for all comparable to bar associations or medical societies with of this, his hours will be long, his pay inadequate, and his effective power to censure or expel, its principles are not standing in the community not particularly high. News­ enforceable. The individual journalist may have the duty, paperman must warm themselves by their own fires. but often does not have the opportunity, to tell the truth Those newspapermen who have 'crossed over' into pub­ as he sees it. He is a hired man, and because he is, his is not licity and advertising, where the pay is better, would like it a profession. Nor are publishers under any professional re­ understood that they are still in the 'same game'. It is true straint. enjoy postal subsidies on the assump­ that newspapermen often have to do menial and even venal tion that the existence of newspapers is in the public in­ jobs, such as furthering their paper's promotional stunts, terest, but publishers as a class do not consider themselves and it is true that public relations men are often newspaper­ to be operating public utilities-and it is perhaps as well men who can write stories that appear to be news that they do not, for in this direction lie evils greater than and are run as such, but the end is different: the pub­ the present haphazard irresponsibility. We are left then, if licity man's intent must always be to serve a master we would have trustworthy newspapers, with the conscience that is not the newspaperman's. The appearance may be of the individual publisher, which can be a very wee, pea­ similar, but the difference is everything. Sometimes when sized thing; his fear that rival organs of communication we who remain journalists come across an advertising copy will achieve greater creditability by their being seen to be writer or a publicity man in a bar-confident and leisurely fairer (an increasingly effective brake on him); or he may on a fat expense account-we have a hard time deciding have to take into account the standards insisted upon by the whether the resentment we feel comes from scorn or envy. journalists who work for him. In the end we are what we are because there are satisfactions As a group, newspapermen are much better than their in our business that the others lack: a delight in craft, a stim­ papers. They too are faced with temptations: the hope ot ulus in variety, an occasional compensation in wrongs advantage if they give the boss what he wants to hear, and righted, a somewhat adolescent urge to be where things are the quite opposite temptation of wishing to indulge their going on and 'in the know'. That man is lucky who is con­ own prejudices. There are hacks among them, as well as tent in his work, finds it stretches his powers and rewards cynics and panderers, quite often in high places, but his time: so many Americans seem to be working at jobs there is a community of undeceived newspapermen who that do not gratify them, living only for their hours away know who among them is cheating on the facts, and they do from work. A good newspaperman may be displeased by not always award their good marks-as those who are scorn­ his circumstances. but need not be ashamed of the calling ed by them imply-only to those who hold similar political he has chosen. views. It is not all cakes and ale. Journalism is a fitful trade. Newspapermen like variety in their assignments, which is another way of saying that they may be deficient in con­ A good journalist is a rewarding sight. He enters a trade centration. They pursue a subject only about as far as, and where the pay is low-low at least for the qualities of in­ rarely much further than, the passing public interest. They telligence, energy, experience, judgment and talent he must are servants to a fickle public; they must seize its attention bring to it. He must have a zest for events, as accountants by novelty, hold it by new injections of interest, and then must love figures and carpenters, wood. He must have a move on to something else. A newspaper can risk boring dedication to facts and a scent for humbug. He is probably its public at its own peril. And so (newspapermen hate to by temperament an observer not a doer, standing outside of admit this) journalism is in some respects not a serious events, often in distaste, and must beware becoming, like a business. It role is at times similar to education, requiring NIEMAN REPORTS 6 simplicity of instruction without falsifying the subject mat­ the chance to be angry, to rout out the rotten; but news­ ter, requiring diversions, distractions and recesses, though papers being what they are, angers are grooved-con­ sometimes demanding concentration; adapting its material fined principally to what can be found out, or if not found to the absorptive capacity of the audience, and even, alas, out, suspected to be wrong with government. Many, though having to compete for attention with less worthy amuse­ not all, reporters willingly accepted this role against the ments. But it cannot compel compulsory attendance. Democrats, only to be disillusioned when publishers proved Newspapermen might not also like to acknowledge that not such ardent pursuers of error in a Republican adminis­ for many readers the daily newspaper is simply an entertain­ tration. But a captious, searching attitude toward any ad­ ment. Such readers may take a half-interested look at the ministration (Republican or Democratic) must be the de­ headlines but they then hurry to the comics or the sport meanor of all journalists, for by an accident of historical pages; they look to their newspaper for instruction, but in , growth the role as watchdog of government falls to the press cooking more than in public affairs; they may seek informa­ in American society, replaces the question period which tion, but it is about television programs and not foreign British ministers must undergo in the House of Commons. events; they may want guidance, but about house-furnish­ ings and fashions more than what is offered them on the Jack the Giant Killer is a pleasing assignment to a news­ editorial page. In this knowledge, the publishers are apt paperman-but less so when only some giants are marked to be shrewder than their employes, paying fat prices for for the kill. What if big businessmen were subject to the a syndicated comic strip or a canned gossip column, know­ same careful inquiry as government: had to answer why ing that they can exploit their monopoly of either one, while this relative was in unmerited high position; why that ex­ slighting the news budget-for after all, they reason, every­ pensive entertainment was allowed; whose head fell for body has access to the same news and what reader really that bad investment; had to say who consented to this appreciates a consistent edge in news coverage? In this I scheming in black markets or that shoddy legalism to thwart think publishers wrong, but not as wrong as I wish they a competitor; had to explain why they tolerated an inferiority were: a newspaper's coverage will be good only if its in the product; had to justify this connivance with an un­ editor and publisher have a passion for making it so, and savory politician or union racketeer, or that use of company find excellence its own reward. Increasingly as newspapers funds to promote selfish ends? In theory, companies have pass from the hands of those who founded them, into the their own machinery for checking such practices, but in possession of their uninterested sons, their lawyers or their reality so long as profits are high very little else is asked of business managers, they become only vehicles for making a boss. A publisher, asked why he did not concern himself money, and perhaps not as efficiently profitable as a garage with this kind of investigation, would say that these things or a hardware store. These merchants fill their paper with are the domain of private business. But are they not touch­ merchandise, and ask only of their editors that they stay out ed with public interest? of trouble, out of libel suits, and play it safe. The proportion Unjustified waste in business, as much as a government's of mediocrity in the American press thus far outweighs the taxation, grabs at the public's pocketbook-but it is not good. A good newspaperman, though he need not be generally considered fair game for newspapermen. ashamed of his calling, can rightly be outraged at its practice. Business is a privileged sanctuary, even when its institu­ tional ads are picturing it as just a collection of open-faced Peter Finley Dunne thought it the duty of a newspaper "folks" like you and me, interested in nothing but the Ame­ "to affiict the comfortable and comfort the affiicted." It is rican way, the improvement of product and the remem­ a rare newspaper today that feels any mission to affiict the brance of millions of fond little shareholders. Public rela­ comfortable. If reporters seem jaundiced, it is because they tions men who in government perform a useful enough have to cover so many windy luncheons, and solemnly service for lazy newspapermen by gathering up facts for record the pompous hypocrisy of the respectable. Sometimes them-while discouraging independent inquiry-are even they are included in the counsels of small groups where the more sleekly successful in business at putting out what they others, feeling safe because they know the newspaper's pub­ would like known about a company, and diverting news­ lisher is one of them, talk the cant of the well-to-do, forget­ papermen from what they do not want to know. It remains ting that the reporter himself does not share the same eco­ for an occasional outburst of grudge by a disappointed nomic stake in their prejudices. Newspapermen are apt to contender, a stockholder's fight, or-long after the event­ be against the successful and the affiuent. In politics, they a congressional committee investigation, for anything ad­ are usually Democrats-except when the Democrats, after verse to be heard. too long in power, became too affluent themselves. No role Executives, those unexamined pillars of the community, satisfies the newspaperman more than that of redresser; have such press immunity, and such scorn for the fumblers 6 NIEMAN REPORTS in public office (any fumbling of their own passing un­ Some of the sting went out of the struggle when reporters, recorded) that when one of them is persuaded to go to in themselves reflecting the feelings of the country, passed Washington as a public duty, is subjected to brash report­ from militant enthusiasm for the New Deal to at most a orial questions, and is no longer safe behind an imposing sentimental predisposition towards the later Democrats. walnut desk and the stillness of wall to wall carpeting, he This change of mood was matched by the rise of practical­ often seems somewhat less spectacular. It then becomes minded publishers who had decided to make a necessity out harder and harder to recruit them for public service, these of virtue. This new breed of publisher made it a policy to businessmen who at board of directors meetings like to say give no unnecessary offense to any powerful group within how uplifted they are by challenges. the community, even unions. They found themselves up A journalist too energetic in seeking out the malpractices against radio and television, whose dependence on govern­ of business risks condemnation as being against business ment regulation made them early in the game decide to itself, yet the same logic should apply that applies to govern­ play the news fairly straight (for all the pseudo-philosophiz­ ment, that it operates best in the public interest when made ing about the impossibility of being objective, I have never to operate in a spotlight. But this is a radical thought, and met a newspaperman who did not know how to follow the lest any man think the press timid, there are angry writers injunction to 'play it straight'). So there has been a trend to point to, whose splenetic outbursts are read by millions. toward less flagrant outbursts of violent feeling on the edi­ Note, however, what they are mostly mad at: there is a torial page, and less apparent partisanship in the news col­ good living to be made in a shrewd grooving of acceptable umns: on many papers the good deeds of the other side grievances. simply get small space, and lengthy treatment is accorded "Truth always prevails in the end," wrote Lord Acton, anybody whose views coincide with the publisher's. This is "but only when it has ceased to be in someone's interest to if readers do not recognize every shenanigan inflicted upon prevent it from doing so." considered subtler, but I am not sure who is being fooled: them they are at least aware of a stale predictability in a If a newspaperman finds his itch to investigate is en­ paper's coverage. Tedium is a dangerous feeling to develop couraged only in some directions, if he finds himself asked in readers. Sometimes one is tempted to sigh for the old to work within the known political prejudices of his pub­ days of honest wrong-headedness boldly proclaiming itself. lisher, purity of motive is not all to be found on one side. There are some who suggest that the way to make news­ The development of reporters' craft unions (particularly papers more responsible is to put their ownership into public at the outset, when Communists played too big a role) sug­ trusts. But trusts can only preserve; they cannot create, and gested that they, if they had their way, would be as biased, either the papers become the responsibility of dynamic man­ as ready to favor their own, as publishers. The contest of wills agers (at which point all the old problems return) or they between newspapermen and publisher, such as it is, is apt risk lapsing into staid sterility. Given our prejudice for an to be muted; in many places the publisher has such clear as­ independent press, the only answer, if not a completely satis­ cendancy that no struggle goes on. Many reporters are factory one, is self-responsibility. There are some American without pronounced political opinions; others get it estab­ newspapers-all too few, but to be honored all the more­ lished early that they wish to stay clear of the 'dirty' stories; whose publishers ignore the prejudices of their fellow busi­ still others find no disharmony between their politics and nessmen and even defy the passions and whims of their pub­ the paper's. For the rest, there are those who say "I only lic. A similar kind of dedication is felt by many newspaper­ work here"; there are others who the in men, even though this is to ask a great deal of low-paid men work here;" there are others who are inwardly restive, in a society which puts premium on other values; it requires and those who find some rationalization such as Ambrose an austerity of mind to accompany a vividness of imagina­ Bierce's: "If asked to justify my long service to journals with tion. But what is so heartening about journalism is how whose policies I was not in agreement and whose character widely this notion of responsibility is felt. And it is ready I loathed ... 0, well, I persuaded myself that I could do to have more asked of it. more good by addressing those who had the greatest need of me-the millions of readers for whom Mr. Hearst was a Copyright @ 1959 by Thomas Griffith misleading light." NIIDMAN REPORTS 7

A Glance Bacliward at the Press By Louis M. Lyons

A candid look at the last 25 years would show them as ing Dove," using Bottom's lines in Midsummer Night's the era of broadcasting. Dream, when he applied for the lion's role. Being told his Against the vivid and dramatic new compeuuon, the roaring would frighten the ladies and get all the actors press has been largely a holding operation. And not hold­ hanged, he promised he would roar as gently as any sucking ing everywhere. It has been an era of consolidation, of dove. fewer newspapers, and so a constriction of the channels of The 35 cartoons picked by the publishers on the Pulitzer information and public opinion. Committee step on no toes, except Hitler's and Stalin's. It has been a period of disappointment and deferment, as They attack the man-eating shark in the form of war, to the development of economic operations to permit any depression and polio. press without huge capital. It is not that the cartoonists had no punch. But their Magazines have cut into the news role effectively. The powerful cartoons were passed over for the prize. newspaper is now one among a number of institutions that Kirby is honored, but his great cartoon against prohibi­ provide news and views. It is groping for ways to adjust tion was omitted. to this more difficult role and resume its former primacy. Duffy is included, but not for his exposure of the Ku Klux The greatest, most obvious, progress has been in trans­ Klan. mission, including pictures. Harry Montgomery of the AP Herblock wins, but not for his cartoons of McCarthy or is due a bow for the progress he has helped to guide in that the cowardice of the Administration in the face of field. McCarthy ism. I wish I had anything else as concrete to report. But journalism is a diverse and amorphous field. That is one This era has seen less direct control by advertisers. But of its fascinations. One may describe his own image of it the total influence of the merchandising role of the press and be no more wrong than the next fellow. With this has soft pedalled its role as opinion leader, kept it generally whistling in the dark, I plunge ahead. to a safe conformity. The period has seen the rise of the columnist; first, and The ruggedly independent papers are fewer. Some that perhaps still, at the expense of the editorials, some would I know, and most respect, look less rugged. The business say to fill a vacuum there. But I think editorials have taken office influence shows through more often. on some strength from this competition. The success of There is nothing sinister in this. It is just that the com­ the columnist suggests a revival of personal journalism, mercial demand to blanket the circulation area tends to with potential restoration of influence. make most papers try to be all things to all men. For in impersonality, journalism had gone about as far The scandalously bad papers are fewer. Palmer Hoyt as it could. There has been recently some reaction against it. reclaimed the Denver Post. Boston was relieved of its Post. The interpretive story lets the reporter put more of him­ Everyone can fill in some places that deserve similiar relief. self into it, which is a gain. But I think these have become more exceptional. But the But Gerald Johnson's new book of the Pulitzer Prize ruthless economics that has diminished the number of news­ cartoons of the last 35 years describes the tone of press con­ papers has killed off some of the more individual papers. trol in this period. His title is The Lines Are Drawn. But the book's pub­ The news is better organized. Newspapers are easier to lishers admit that in respect to controversial issues, "Draw­ read and more efficient. Efficiency is so universal and the ing Away" might have been a more descriptive title. AP so omnipresent that nearly all newspapers look much He himself says he wanted to call it "Roar Like a Suck- alike and are alike in content. Writing is better. Papers are brighter. Their readers At the 25th anniversary meeting of the Associated Press are better informed. Whether enough better informed to Managing Editors Association at French Lick, Nov. 12, keep pace with the increasing complexity of the world they Louis M. Lyons was one of several invited to give a 20 need to understand is something else. minute review of newspaper developments over the quarter­ The staffs are better educated, more adequate to report century. the world they live in. This Dr. Flesch nonsense of trying 8 NIEMAN REPORTS to write for kindergarten in sentences not over eight words education-our chief American industry. Not until the long has pretty well gone from the papers I see. scandalous deficiency of our educational plant brought a I think that more newspapers are more completely dedi­ White House Conference did any papers to speak of take cated to their own jobs. Fewer people are running political education seriously. Only Sputnik really brought it into parties from editorial desks. Morals are higher. Fewer pa­ the city room. A few papers now cover education as one pers allow staffers to work on the side for race tracks or of the principal bases of our community life. All too few. politicians. Probably the most conspicuous failure of adequate report­ The news is more in the open-thanks to broadcasting. ing on the national scene has been the Supreme Court­ It was TV that exposed McCarthy and put him on the one of the three coordinate branches of our government. downgrade. People get candid views of politicians and With a few distinguished exceptions, it has been covered, expect more candid reporting. when at all, casually, almost absent~mindedly, without much Broadcasting has stimulated more ~ serviceable newspaper­ of any consideration for what it takes. It is getting attention ing. The press has not yet found its fullest function in a now, since it has become a target of demagogic attack, world increasingly occupied by broadcasting. But it has which could never have got as far as it has, if the American done some suggestive experimenting. It has begun to try people had had the Court and its relation to the strategic reporting in depth. issues that must be resolved by it, reported with any ap­ By surveys and other new techniques, it has extended the proach to the care and completeness given to the Congress, dimension of reporting to explore political trends, to reveal legislature and city councils. educational needs, slum sores, traffic and zoning problems, One of the most useful developments of specialities has hidden segregation. It has made only a start on the needs. been in business and government. James Marlow, AP, Too many of the issues of city life-traffic, noise, smoke, the makes sense of complex tax and government issues. If you need of tearing down and rebuilding-and all the remedies don't see his column as much as you did, it is because more and correctives sorely needed to relieve the desperate con­ papers have been developing their own business columns. dition of our cities and the desperation of city life,-are Sylvia Porter writes finance and business news for the con­ often handled as if the real estate exchange and the retail sumer. She doesn't turn it into mush for the women. She trade board were editing the paper. makes it mean something for everyone. The problems of making our cities fit to live in still in­ Anne O'Hare McCormick was one of the first who wrote vite newspaper attention. foreign policy stories to educate readers. She didn't turn Crusading had its day before the 25 year era of the out stuff that was just an echo of the Dulles press con­ APME opened. Theodore Roosevelt put an end to its ference. She knew. She'd been there. She kept in touch. popularity with his attack on the Muckrakers 50 years ago. She gave the reader the reality. But the investigational reporter is coming into his own in Doris Fleeson does it now every few days in national poli­ an increasing number of cities beyond St. Louis. Notable tics. Women have more sensitive pens than most men. performances have become nationally familiar in Chicago, The best of them have an instinct for reality and a sure Seattle, Portland (Oregon), Nashville and Providence, to sense of what's intrinsically interesting, and they write it go no further. often with pictorial clarity. Every man knows that from the letters of women. They Specialization has found new development. Developing are about the only letter writers left, and they write with their own specialists has ever been one of the best jobs news­ feeling and meaning. Of course I refer to the minority of papers have done-in politics, finance, theatre-whatever either sex who can write at all, in this age of receding style they feel they need. and disappearing syntax, whose most blatant vulgarisms They were slow in developing labor reporting. But they and sloppy usage now have the imprimatur of Bergen have. When I was new, labor was covered only in a strike­ Evans' blessing. and chiefly on the picket line-in proportion to the violence. Even in science, a woman, Frances Burns of the Boston This has changed. Globe, turns in the most distinguished performance in my The press was behind the public in developing an inter­ regwn. est in science. But AP led the way there and has kept it up. ·This 25 years has seen women emerge in journalism Science develops faster than our coverage, and public against as much sex discrimination as they found in any education in science runs ahead of our coverage. It is still field. No longer are they only society editors or sob sis­ inadequate, but I think we know that, which is the way to ters-the degrading roles to which they were earlier con­ the cure. fined-snob or sob appeal. The press was terribly delinquent in getting around to Women are people now, even on newspaper staffs-al- NIEMAN REPORTS 9 most the ultimate emancipation. There had been no more As the number of our papers shrinks until most cities conservative citadel of stag inferiority complex than the have only one, such a forum becomes harder to find. Its average city desk. function must be filled in other ways. It is true that newspapers, which find themselves with­ We are, the newspapers say, coming out of a recession. out local competition, tend to become less partisan, more They have been very hasty about the conclusion, starting moderate. But so far, this does nothing to supply an oppo­ about last April. But as one who remembers the timidity sition press. Opposition to the forces of ownership in any with which the Depression of the '30's was reported, I ap­ community becomes increasingly impossible. This is a de­ preciate the greater candor in reporting this recession. fect of an open society that cannot too long remain un­ Of course it was harder to cover up. We now have a remedied, without a dangerous gap in our system, and a mechanism that is almost self-revealing as to the state of serious result for the press in the public regard. our economy. But we certainly have been in a hustle to get it off the front From many sides comes evidence of a dangerous amount page and very generally complacent in accepting the Ad­ of leakage of talent from newspapers, and more particularly ministration's claims that it was all over in time for the from those preparing or considering a newspaper career. election. Pay must keep pace with what can as easily be earned else­ Nevertheless, economic reporting has gained immensely, where. Probably more important to the best men,-the job and this of course reflects a readership exposed bitterly to must have its satisfactions and the newspaper their respect. economic pressures and ready to read it with a critical eye. Too often one or both are lacking. They know about inflation and even about deflating in­ A big need is to free staff energies to do the job of making fluences in government action. meaning of events. But in this, the financial writers are generally still writ­ In 25 years of working on assignments, I never was recon­ ing the old cliches almost totally without any critical ciled to it. I am not now. We run our papers on city editor influence on government policy, because they are so immune schedules. Reporters are on tap, to be sent out like firemen, to reality. Most newspapers still discuss the increasing na­ on call. There has to be a small mobile staff for shipwreck, tional debt with no relation to the increasing national pro­ hurricane, murder, holocaust. But for such urgencies any­ duction, wealth and burgeoning population or any sense body can be drafted from his own run, and be happy at that everything in America grows bigger. the break of the key story. I remember in the 1930's, when my old editor was re­ But where I look for information is to the writers who marking that the Republicans had people worrying about cover a field, or area, or subject, and write about what they the national debt who had no business thinking about it know to be important developments in their fields. at all. They are now at least a little better educated about A paper like the Christian Science Monitor has its local economics. It remains the field of greatest need of edu­ staff on State politics, city affairs, maritime affairs, edu­ cation of newspapermen, especially those covering govern­ cation, art, commerce, finance. They follow those areas and ment. Fortunately the younger newspapermen are sensi­ know what's news each day. They tell me more that's going tive to this and many of them consciously seek to fill in their on at State House or City H all or in other public areas than gaps in economics. I see this in the Nieman Fellows. any of the papers that dispatch most of their reporters out from a city desk to this hearing, that press conference, and The election again finds most of the people going the keep their news to these scheduled spots of the most overt opposite way from most of the newspapers. The one-party activity. press was not so complete as when Adlai Stevenson called I believe the principal reason columnists are more inter­ it first to our attention in 1952. In California some papers esting than editorials or most news reports is that they con­ abandoned Knowland. But of course a divided party per­ trol their own time and determine their own subj ects and mitted them still to be half Republican. It is not the same so write about what they find to be most important and thing to abandon a sinking ship as to embark on a different interesting. cruise. In New York the one staunchly Democratic paper The more of any staff that can be put on their own, and they had was reversed in a Roorbach by the publisher on made responsible for areas of coverage, the more meaning election eve. and interest there will be in our news stories. It is a sad distortion of our political life, that in most cities I am aware that this is old-fashioned, and reverts to the there is no newspaper debate in a political campaign, which primitive era in journalism when editors ran their papers should be in essence a public debate with the press as the and we had fewer organization men. I am unconvinced that great forum. the historic journalistic process under the great editors was 10 NIEMAN REPORTS wrong. This implies hiring and developing staffers up to paper for every-day banner heads across eight columns, the job, letting them find the full satisfaction of contribut­ whether the news is big or little that day. ing the information people need on things that affect their I enjoy seeing go up to an 8-column lives-and paying them enough to keep them against the banner on election, and then go back to a one-column top competitive fields for which their knowledge and ability head two days after, when there's nothing left but talk about well qualify them. the post mortems. It restores my sense of proportion to see the heads shrink I recommenn to you the Also'ps' book-The Reporter's to the quiet of in between times. It makes the newspaper Trade. Here you have personal journalism making its look more sensible-less like a circus barker. mark by intelligence and hard work. Don't be put off by One of our more pungent critics suggested saving the its arrogant tone. They took defense for their specialty biggest type in the shop against the Second Coming of and followed its strategic problems into government, poli­ Christ. It is still a good idea: it would relieve the im­ tics, international relations, atomic secrecy, and all the com­ pression of journalism as an hysterical calling. plicated and devious involvements of bombs and missiles. The press is one of our most strategic institutions, mirror­ They made themselves experts, and had always the cour­ ing the condition of the country and the people. It can be age of their convictions. Confident of their own facts, they no better than the people in it. have stood up to Admiral Strauss and Secretary Wilson, A real problem is to make it as good as the people in it, and conceded nothing. They have done something for the to let their full capacities come through the institutional status of journalism. mold. This is a problem for the management of all insti­ Independence, courage, diligence, intelligence, find their tutions, as they grow greater and more essential in our place and serve us well. A Clark Mollenhoff, armed with society. his own facts and indomitable courage, carries a Ladejinski We all live by institutions, in institutions. We depend case right to the President, and comes back with it, till he on institutions to organize the channels of work, to provide gets the record straight. the stability and resources that let the work get done. This is personal journalism. It takes a considerable per­ But institutions depend on individuals to give them a son to bring it off. These are the men for us-the only ones. character, to keep them alive, to keep them effective, to Some of them need papers up to their own mark. give them intelligence and integrity. I think, in my optimistic moments, there is more of this A key issue of modern life is that of the individual in his and more opportunity for it. institution, to see that the individual has a chance to impart I think more papers now depend more on professional personality and force to the institution, and to direct its leadership. Already demonstration of this is the Gannett energy and resources to the needs of people. group which have been brought into the 20th century under In none is that more essential than the newspaper. The the professional modern management of Paul Miller as pub­ saving thing is that, of all institutions I know, the press prob­ lisher and Vincent Jones as editorial director. ably provides most satisfaction to the people serving it­ with the largest sense that through it they can meet a vital If you have to save money, you might start to save the need of people-to be informed. This is a great thing. It vast waste of sending hundreds of reporters to a Presidential describes a high calling. The people in it must determine to press conference, where only a dozen can ask questions, and keep it so. the answers are available in text to all,-while only a few, I remember a word from my dear old friend James Mor­ like Clark Mollenhoff, are turned loose to explore the gan, when he was eighty-five, and not yet through as an bureaucratic underbrush to see what's hidden. editor: There's a chance to save in the immense expanse of white "I wouldn't swap my luck," he said, "for any other." NIEMAN REPORTS 11

Our Nervous Press and its Nervous Critics

By Charles E. Higbie

"If there is one institutional disease to which the media sibility" has been added. The linkage is supremely logical of mass communication seem particularly subject, it is a ner­ for one duty cannot be carried out without the other. vous reaction to criticism. As a student of the mass media You will find all thoughtful publishers and press officials I have been continually struck and occasionally puzzled by quite ready to accept the abstract legend of "press respon­ this reaction, for the media themselves so vigorously defend sibility." What concerns us is whether in a practical sense principles guaranteeing the right to criticize." responsibility is being met. I suggest that what most pub­ In the decade since Paul Lararsfeld said this no one has lishers do not recognize is that responsibility is an outward improved markedly on these words. Neither has there relationship with society, not an internal matter, and that been much progress made in the treatment of the news­ it involves accepting in good spirit criticism from all sorts paper's allergy to criticism. Like the cure for cancer, the of outsiders. It also means that if newspaper officials do not break-through to save the publishers and their palace guard recognize their responsibility to answer to criticism, their from this institutional disease seems always to be in the own freedom to criticize and to get material to criticize is future, but continuously longed for by observers of the imperiled. press. And let no one fail to forsee the public demand I think it is no accident that the ten years since Dr. Lazars­ for the cure when it is at last demonstrated in both fields. feld made his observation about mass media and criticism have been extremely uncomfortable ten years for news­ I begin by mentioning attitudes toward criticism on the papers. I'm not thinking of their economic problems. In part of the press because it is impossible to plan research the field of public regard and official regard, newspapers on newspaper performance without taking it into account. have lost ground. For one thing, as Lazarsfeld pointed out ten years ago, the It is in this past decade that the name "One Party Press" reverse side of newspapers being allergic to criticism is that was applied. This in itself ought to be intriguing to journal­ the critic becomes nervous. Especiaily nervous is the re­ ism historians. How long since such a term of opprobrium searcher connected with a journalism school, for the very has been flung at the press and achieved such extensive usage good reason that newspapers on the whole are nervous and such frenzied disclaimers? I maintain that one must about journalism schools also. It must be recognized that go back into the last century and the term "Yellow Journal­ the place of journalism schools in the newspaper world in ism" before finding words of equal intensity in circulation. many respects is still unsettled. Are they basic training It was not the barbed character of Adlai Stevenson's camps for city room rookies and that only? Or are they words that made "One Party Press" a part of our times. It going to take up a responsibility to investigate, criticize, and was the readiness of a large share of our population to accept set standards as their companion schools in law, medicine them. commerce, or engineering? Responsibility must be equated with criticism. The criti­ This nervousness about criticism on the part of newspaper cism which must concern us chiefly is informed criticism, executives might be tolerated as only an amusing eccentri­ based on investigation and study. Such criticism is ex­ city, if the operating of newspapers was thought to have the tremely useful in revealing the strength of an institution as same social value as, say, turning out beer. We all cheerfully well as discovering its shortcomings. assume brewers to be big portly men; that they may or may How have newspapers and other media viewed respon· not be is considered important enough to ascertain. Why sibility in the face of investigation and research? Perhaps the then do we worry about the stereotype that publishers are clearest indication of collective attitude on this score in the busy establishing. last decade occurred when the major publishers were polled The reason is that to the "Freedom of the Press" so fort­ in regard to their attitude toward the proposed Sigma Delta unately inscribed in the Constitution, the word "respon- Chi sponsored survey of election coverage in 1956. Here was a chance for an investigation of the newspaper performance Charles Higbie is associate professor of journalism at the on the most vital process of democracy, the general election. University of Wisconsin. This is from a paper given at the The research was to be performed by members of the uni­ convention of the Association for Education in Journalism versity community with over half a million dollars in funds at Columbia, Mo., Aug. 28. to be contributed by the Ford Foundation. The investiga- 12 NIEMAN REPORTS tion was to be in the nature of an inventory which would ment of academic personnel in research methods by hiring furnish indications of whether "One Party Press" charges them for activities paid for and directed by the newspapers were inflated. The newspaper jury of publishers of major and radio and TV stations. But this generally was com­ daily newspapers and representative smaller circulation mercial research which had as its purpose the increased papers voted definitely against this proposal to examine the efficiency of the communications enterprise. It was not responsibility of the press in elections. The general tenor of critical research. the objections displayed in Editor & Publisher which Partly as a result of resistance they have encountered in queried publishers on their attitude before the official pro­ critical research, journalism schools have turned to basic re· posals asking for their opinion were distributed. The re­ search, i.e. the development of techniques and concepts for vealed sentiment was overwhelmingly against the survey. their own sake. It is the type of research that brings increas­ This sentiment was confirmed in the official results from a ed prestige on the campus. It also brings communications jury of 76 publishers: 37 against the proposal, 17 favoring researchers into contact with other professional and aca­ the proposal, 10 with qualified support, 12 refused to re­ demic researchers. But journalism researchers have found turn ballots or otherwise refused to express an opinion. in working with these colleagues from other disciplines With only 27 supporting it, the study was dropped. that these other researchers have a ready outlet for their dis­ Let us recall also, the attitude of the press toward the ques­ coveries. They are eagerly awaited by commercial, manu­ tion whether congressional committees should or could facturing, and governmental activities so that overall effi­ investigate the staff of a newspaper. A show of opinion ciency of these activities may be judged. So even when news­ was also exhibited in the Editor & Publisher on this paper researchers escape into basic research they are remind­ matter. A comparison of the sentiment on this occasion ed by their associates the application of research techniques with that expressed toward the Sigma Delta Chi proposal is the natural course of events. shows that the newspapers which showed no concern over the Senate committee investigation of the New York Times In the past few years broadening concepts of the duties were in general those which had shown a great deal of and conduct of mass communication systems have been ex­ alarm over the Sigma Delta Chi project. Conversely news­ pressed. The Royal Commission of the Press in England papers whose officials had shown no alarm over the election and the Commission on the Freedom of the Press here study were the ones which were most alarmed over the were both noteworthy in suggesting to the public that the Congressional group's interest in press personnel. What press must be held to different and broader goals in modern we have then is what appears to be a majority more alarmed society. Prof. Fred S. Siebert has characterized this broad­ at criticism by university people than investigation by ening system of concepts as the social-responsibility theory Congress. On the other hand a minority see a threat from of the press. Changing views on the self-sufficiency of the Congress but little danger from attempts to examine press human mind, the nature of government, and the nature performance by professors. of knowledge have led many philosophers, both inside and I think now something should be said concerning the outside the communications area, to bring a new approach state of mind of the academic critics of the press. Dr. to the definition of freedom of the press. One characteristic Lazarsfeld said one of the unfortunate results of the ner­ of these new approaches is that they often start to reason vous attitude of newspapers towards criticism was that it from the needs of the citizen rather than from the needs of made critics of the press nervous also. What then has gen­ the publisher. Newspapers are asked to be more responsive erally taken place within the field of critical research in the to their environment. In this view the newspaper ex­ decade that I have been reviewing? ecutive has the moral duty to heed and react to criticism Basic communication research in university schools of originating outside the newspaper organization itself. The journalism came out of the World War II years with more method of reacting to criticism in the light of his own ad­ confidence and experience than it had ever before achieved. ministrative knowledge is of course the newspaper's own People who had pioneered the field carried out a number decision and will undoubtedly remain so in our demo­ of governmental projects and accumulated experience which cratic society. only large scale operations provide. They soon attracted However when this demand is made, that outside criti­ around them many younger men who returned to the uni­ cism be considered by newspapers as a moral duty, it must versities from the war service. Faced with the extreme recognize that this logically extends "responsibility" to nervousness of the newspaper profession, the enthusiastic groups and individuals outside the newspaper structure researchers moved to other subject areas. Techniques of also. If newspapers are to be socially responsive to their research were perfected and new ideas tried. In many cases environment, they must be given the benefit of reliable in­ the communications media did in fact recognize the achieve- dicators on their performance by critics who understand NIEMAN REPORTS 13 their responsibility to cntlctze. This criticism must be However, in several areas they can provide the most val­ sustained as well as responsible. Journalism schools are uable, the most sympathetic, and the most sustained critical peculiarly suited for this role of providing informed criti­ material for newspapers to consider. cism and in fact can not very easily escape this responsibility. Located as they are in university communities, journalism It may be fairly stated then that, despite continued stated schools are in an advantageous position to feel the response need for critical examination of the mass media, there of many professions and learned disciplines to the day to has been a notable lack of criticism. Journalism school re­ day performance of the mass communications systems. searchers can scarcely ignore this logical demand for applied Furthermore journalism schools may be a valuable two­ research in spite of the past history of suspicion on the part way channel with expert knowledge of both the communi­ of a major portion of the press. cations problems and techniques with which to meet the If this assessment of the present state of attitude in the critics from other professions. field is correct, what type of program is practical, possible, But in order to be entirely successful in this position, and advisable in the future? journalism educators must be sure of their relationship to My personal conclusion is that cooperation on a large the operating units of communication. Their conception scale from the press as a whole will not be forthcoming in of their role must not be too close to that of the profession the immediate future. Despite progress, as illustrated by or they will be in effect mere extensions of the production the active support of research by some very prominent news­ units themselves. If this is so they may be incapable of pro­ papers, any research on press performance, such as an elec­ viding the independent and "outside" criticism of the press tion survey, will have to be carried out in the face of dis­ which the new theorists feel necessary. The sterile concep­ approval by a majority of the general practitioners in the tion of the journalism school as being chiefly a breaking-in field. place for reporters results in an industry-dominated school The question then is what should be the reaction of uni­ from which it would be idle to expect adequate external versity researchers toward the theoretical need for this type criticism. Likewise, if journalism school educators regard of critical activity? If the journalism school is conceived to themselves as merely a public relations office for the press in be basically a mere training extension of the newspaper it­ general it goes without saying that little critical contribution self, I suppose the answer might be that the judgment of will be made to the press. the profession in general should be accepted and the critical Many other sources of social criticism of course must activity forgotten. On the other hand, if need for informed be developed for the press. For many reasons journalism outside criticism is genuinely recognized, I don't think schools should not presume to be the entire source of critical communication scholars can turn away from this duty des­ activity toward the communication system in the future. pite the dislike of the newspapers for it. 14 NIEMAN REPORTS Neglected Opportunities A Reporter Suggests Ways for Press to Compete By E. W. Kieckhefer

In recent months two important metropolitan newspapers began to compete seriously with the newspaper. The radio have succumbed to the pressures which are besetting the networks expanded the area of competition. entire industry. Others are reported to be faltering. Television dealt the newspaper another blow after World Events have given rise to another spate of self-analysis by War II. This medium offered another factor which news­ publishers. These rather uniformly cite the costs of publish­ papers could not match-the moving picture of the news ing which are rising faster than revenues. They refer to and personality which radio already had delivered, and antiquated methods of printing, to rising labor costs, des­ offered it in the home without cost out of the pocket at the pite the fact that newspapers are notoriously among the time it was delivered. low:est-paying groups in the mass media, and they worry The radio and television industry has been fully aware of about increasing competition from other media. its advantages of immediateness, intimacy, convenience and None apparently takes into consideration the failure of freedom from cost. It has pushed these advantages to the most metropolitan newspapers to realize their function in fullest. It has been willing to pour money into news cover­ the new world of mass communications which has develop­ age at a rate newspapers cannot touch. Sig Mickelson, vice­ ed since World War I. None shows awareness of the fact president of the Columbia Broadcasting System, estimates that the content of metropolitan newspapers has changed that CBS loses $8,000,000 to $9,000,000 a year on its news op­ little during that period, despite the strong competition from erations. It is fair to assume that the other networks stand competing media which in many ways can excel in the similar losses. They can afford to lose that money because function that newspapers once performed. effective presentation of the news attracts listeners and view­ The American newspaper through the years of its devel­ ers to the revenue-producing entertainment shows which opment has served two major purposes. One has been to pre­ are the bread and butter of that industry. sent factual information about the events of the day. The other has been to attempt to mold pubJic opinion through expression of opinion in the editorial page columns. But radio and television are not the only competitors the Until World War I, newspapers had a monopoly in metropolitan newspapers have today . Big city publishers are those fields. Technological improvements such as the tele­ inclined to discount the weeklies as of small consequence. graph, the linotype and the high-speed press all favored the Yet, the National Project in Agricultural Communications growth of newspapers. Improved transportation systems at Michigan State University recently noted that there were and subsidies from the Federal Government made it pos­ 8,408 weeklies in operation in 1957, compared with 8,381 in sible for the metropolitan dailies to reach out beyond their 1948. And the circulation of these weeklies in 1957 totaled city limits and serve the growing trading areas of the cities. 19,272,199, compared with only 13,245,343 in 1948. This is The advent of radio did not cut too deeply into the role hardly a dying industry! of the newspaper. But radio did soon prove to have the The weeklies, like radio and television, have found their advantage of immediacy in reporting the news. The news­ place in the communications business. The rural weeklies paper "extra" was the first casualty resulting from the new thrive on the minutiae of the local community which the competition. metropolitan daily, with its sprawling country circulation, As radio developed it introduced the news "personality," cannot hope to match. And in recent years there has been a the pleasing or convincing voice attached to a name. Some rebirth of the neighborhood or surburban newspaper, cater­ as it developer\. It offered this in addition to the immediacy ing to the demands of the decentralized city dweller and of these radio personalities were men who transferred from stealing business from the metropolitan daily just as the metropolitan newspapers to the voice medium because of outlying shopping centers have been stealing business from higher financial rewards offered. In this movement radio the downtown stores. Some metropolitan newspapers have attempted to compete with these surburban weeklies by E. W. Kieckhefer is farm editor of the Louisville Courier­ publishing suburban sections. The very bigness of the Journal, now on leave with a grant to study the changing metropolitan daily defeats its purpose in this respect. The farm picture. He was a Nieman Fellow in 1943 from the suburbanite is just as happy to have his picture or his news Minneapolis Star. or his advertising appear in the newspaper of the commun- NIEMAN REPORTS 15 ity in which he lives or does business as he is to have it It also has been customary to hide the editorial page on appear in the metropolitan press where it seems less impor­ a left-hand, inside sheet, even though publishers throughout tant because it is lost in the vastness of the whole. the nation have paid out huge sums in readership surveys to learn that the right-hand pages are the best read. If edi­ If the metropolitan press has lost its superiority in the torial opinion is one of the few things left to the daily news­ swiftness of news presentation, lacks the intimacy of some paper as a vital selling point, isn't it possible that this fea­ of the other mediums and must operate on a budget which ture should return to the front page? in many ways is more limited than that of its competitors, what then is left for the daily newspaper in the bigger cities? Publishers and journalism schools also cling to the myth Three possibilities seem to stand out: that nothing is so dead as yesterday's newspaper. Why? 1. Editorial opinion. Radio and especially television have Most large newspapers maintain well-patronized old-copy moved into the field of news interpretation to some services where interested persons pay premium prices for extent, but mainly in the form of one-shot spectaculars deal­ back copies, and operate library services which provide ing with pressing problems of the moment. Newspapers many people with reference material. Yet, where is the met­ are able to carry on the consistent editorial hammering that ropolitan newspaper which sells its wares as "the news for long-term problems need. The field of editorialization at the today and tomorrow, the news when you want it?" community, state and regional levels is wide open to daily There are exceptions to the rule, of course. The New newspapers. Some cities-Hartford, St. Louis and Los An­ York Times takes pride in being a newspaper of record. geles are examples-have attempted a limited amount of The Christian Science Monitor seeks out the type of news radio editorializing, but the number is small and probably which will live at least until its product can be delivered will continue so because broadcasters, subject to Federal to its nationwide audience. And has Government controls, are reluctant to engage in contro­ done an outstanding job of servicing the business commun­ versy. ity of the nation with the gist of the national and world 2. Service as a medium of record. The magnetic tape news while at the same time developing the business-situa­ makes possible rebroadcast or delayed telecast of events. tion report in a readable form as a front-page item. But they But the listener or viewer cannot clip and file a portion of a are exceptions and the lessons they teach are not being broadcast or telecast. Nor can he lay it aside to be picked learned very rapidly by the metropolitan dailies. up again at his convenience for further study. Audience participation is offered by most city newspapers 3. Audience participation. In radio and television, audi­ through such features as "Advice-to-the-lovelorn," "What's ence participation is limited to the entertainment field (quiz your ailment?" and the etiquette advisers. True, there usu­ shows, People Are Funny, etc.) and possibly to the submis­ ally is a "Letters-to-the-editor" column, but readers are ad­ sion of a single question to VIP's who consent to appear on vised they must keep their letters brief, and the space devoted question-and-answer sessions. to them usually looks as though it were the area the edi­ If these are the areas in which the metropolitan press torial writers couldn't fill that day because they had run out can best serve the public, they are also the areas which often of ideas. Most of the letters columns excite little interest. are most neglected by the press. The transition from the stodgy format of today's news­ Editorial pages of many metropolitan newspapers still are paper to the type of vehicle that better fits the needs of the filled with puerile comments by hirelings who try to reflect reading public probably would not be easy. Publishers seem the opinions of absentee owners or publishers who do not intent upon putting out a product which differs but little participate in the formulation of editorial policy because from the newspaper that filled the need 50 years ago. And they are too busy watching the cash box. Few, indeed, are they seem to want to do it by spending as little as possible the newspapers which have developed on the local level in the process. Young men in journalism schools seldom strong editorial writers who are known to the readers of that choose newspapers as their line of work. And many of newspaper. those who do join a newspaper staff soon become discour­ Most newspapers cling to the idea that the men who re­ aged with the low pay, lack of opportunities and constant port the news should have no opinions about the news they harping by management on the need for economies. As a report and therefore should have no hand in the writing of result, newspaper staffs today are made up largely of very editorials. This, of course, is a myth, and can be proved so young and very old men. There isn't much of a middle­ by talking to any seasoned police reporter about the opera­ aged group in the business. tion of the law enforcement agencies of the community If the newspapermen cannot generate any more enthu­ or a veteran city hall reporter about the affairs of the siasm about newspapers than they display, how can we hope community. to arouse the interest of subscribers? 16 NIElMAN REPORTS

Professional Education for Journalism in America By Norval Neil Luxon

Six thousand and eighty-eight students were enrolled in but this paper will concern itself only with schools and 99 schools and departments of journalism in the United departments of journalism and will not address itself to the States in the 1957-58 fall semester. The total includes larger question as to what type of education and experience junior, senior, and graduate students. The 99 colleges and constitutes the best preparation for a career in the communi­ universities reporting represent 90 per cent of the institu­ cations field. tions listing schools of journalism in the Editor & Pub­ The rapid increase in a span of fifty years from one lisher Year Book for 1957 and 60 per cent of the school of journalism to more than 150 has brought both journalism departments listed in American Universities problems and criticism. It has been and still is accompanied and Colleges, 1956 edition. However, because the schools by growing pains. not represented are small ones, it may be accurately assumed Early emphasis in journalism instruction on college cam­ that the total covers at least 95 per cent of students enrolled puses was on skills or techniques courses teaching the prac­ in professional schools of journalism. tical aspect of newspaper work. This was a natural devel­ Courses in journalism have been offered in American opment. The schools were established to train young people universities and colleges, chiefly land-grant colleges and state to work on newspapers. The teachers for the most part universities, since 1873, but the first formalized program were former newspapermen, many with only a baccalaur­ leading to a degree in journalism dates only from 1908 when eate degree. It is fortunate for the cause of professional edu­ a School of Journalism was established at the University of cation for journalism that these early schools were estab­ Missouri. That institution is planning an observance o£ lished as integral parts of institutions of higher learning­ this event starting next August and running through May often as departments in colleges of arts and sciences-that 1959. the pioneer teachers, in most instances were commited to the A program aimed to commemorate the founding of the theory that education for journalism requires a back­ school, emphasize the importance of a free press, win from ground in such disciplines as history, political science, the people a higher regard for journalism as a profession, English, economics, psychology, and sociology, and strengthen an appreciation of the journalist's responsibili­ that in the environment of the recently-founded land­ ties, and interest more young people in journalism as a grant colleges and state universities the fledgling journalism career has been outlined by the School with events sched­ schools found an academic atmosphere hospitable to ex­ uled over a nine-month period. The annual convention of perimentation and a pragmatic approach. the Association for Education in Journalism, in which some 800 teachers of journalism in colleges and universities A study of the curricular content of journalism programs hold membership, to be held on the Missouri campus made in 1926-1927 showed clearly the predominance of August 25-29, will officially open Missouri's semi-centennial practical courses. A second survey made ten years later observance. noted the addition of courses in contemporary affairs, pub­ Staff members on the larger newspapers in the United lic opinion, the foreign press, and comparative journalism. States possess varied backgrounds of education and experi­ The schools were widening their horizons and for the most ence. Some of the best-qualified reporters and editors are part were looking beyond the borders of the states in which virtually self-educated and have had little, if any, education they were located. on the university level; others hold degrees from liberal arts In the past twenty years, the professional schools of jour­ colleges with majors in a wide variety of fields; still others, nalism have developed their programs along even more and this is particularly true of the younger staff members, comprehensive lines. An increasing number of courses in are graduates of professional schools of journalism. There international communication and foreign journalism is evi­ is much to be said for each of these methods of preparation, dent. The social effects of mass communication are being studied in such courses as 'Functions and Responsibilities This discussion of American journalism schools was of Contemporary Journalism,' 'Press and Society,' 'Journal­ done for the Gazette of , an international journalism ism in a Democracy,' 'Ethics of Journalism,' Mass Com­ publication. Norval Neil Luxon is dean of the school of munication in Modern Society,' and 'Press in a Dynamic journalism in the University of North Carolina. Society.' NIEMAN REPORTS 17 Leading scholars in the field have urged the schools of Most schools make a special effort to establish and main­ journalism to accept the responsibility of pointing out to tain a close liason with the newspapers and other communi· the profession or industry the need for correction of cer­ cation media of the area in which they are located. tain current practices in the comntunication media. Non-daily newspapers of the , of which there The most marked trend of the past twenty-five years in are some 8,700, compared with 1,760 dailies, benefit directly professional education for journalism in the United States from the short courses and conferences which carry no uni­ is that toward graduate study, including research. Journal­ versity credit but which provide instruction in the various ism research in the first twenty-five years of the twentieth techniques and discussion of recent developments in their century had been done chiefly by social scientists in disci· fields of interest. plines other than journalism, but with the growth of gradu­ In some institutions the offices of the state press associa· ate work and the interrelation of teaching and research on tions are housed in the journalism building and the officers the professional and graduate level, teachers of journalism hold joint appointments as part-time teaching staff mem­ and students working under their direction have produced bers. In others, office space is supplied for personnel, and a respectable body of knowledge and have contributed in in still others the press group offices are located in off-cam­ no small degree to the advancement of learning in the field. pus offices. In many states, the journalism school adminis­ Included in the 6,088 total enrollment this fall are 821 trator through interviews, conferences, and questionnaires students working toward advanced degrees in forty-two of determines the type of service desired by newspapers of his the ninety-nine institutions. The majority of these are work­ state and carries out within the limit of his resources the ing toward the A.M. degree, a few toward the Doctor of requests. Philosophy degree. Most recent data on degrees granted in Two centers of continuing education of interest to news­ the United States show that 182 A.M. degrees and six Ph.D. papermen in the United States are the Nieman Fellowships degrees in journalism were granted in 1955-1956. at Harvard University and the American Press Institute at Among the professional schools of journalism which still Columbia University. The Nieman Fellowships, provided train undergraduates but have turned their attention and for by a $1,300,000 bequest from the widow of a Wisconsin committed their resources to graduate level instruction and newspaper publisher, were established in 1937 and the first continuing research programs the School of Journalism, fellowships awarded in 1938. The American Press Institute, University of Minnesota, which has a Research Division founded by contributions from thirty-eight newspaper edi­ with its own statistical staff; the Institute of Communica­ tors and publishers, held its first seminar in 1946. tions Research, allied with the Department of Journalism, The influence of these two adult education programs on at Stanford University; the Institute of Communications Re­ United States journalism has been significant although the search, connected with the School of Journalism and numbers of participants are not large. In the twenty years Communications at the University of Illinois; the School of that Nieman Fellowships have been in operation, 240 news­ Journalism at the University of Wisconsin, which works papermen have been Nieman Fellows. In the dozen years closely with its specialized Department of Agricul­ since the American Press Institute scheduled its first semi­ tural Journalism; the University of Missouri, the first nar, 1,818 newspaper men and women from 509 United and for many years the only school of journalism to offer States and Canadian newspapers have attended 76 seminars. work leading to the Doctor of Philosophy degree, and the The Nieman Fellowship awards provide an academic Graduate and Research Division of the School of Journal­ year's study at Harvard. Newpapermen with three years' ism at the University of North Carolina, which has a close experience are eligible. Each Fellow is paid approximately working relationship and interlocking staff appointments his newspaper salary during his term in residence. The Fel­ with the Institute for Research in Social Science. lows to date tend to average 30 years of age and 10 years Some of the other institutions which offer graduate of newspaper experience. work in journalism are the State University of Iowa, North­ The American Press Institute seminars run two weeks western University, Michigan State University, University for which an all expense fee of $360 is charged. Those in of Oregon, and Syracuse University. attendance are housed in university dormitories and eat A third responsibility which schools of journalism have most of their meals together. Unlike the Nieman Fellow­ accepted in addition to teaching and research is that of serv­ ships, which are for news and editorial personnel only, ice to their state and region. Many schools co-operate with the A.P.I. seminars cover all phases of newspaper opera­ state press associations in arranging annual conventions. tion. The number of newspapers contributing to the sup­ They provide short courses, ranging from one-day meetings port of the seminars now stands at 143. Any newspaperman to two-week series of conferences or sessions, for personnel with five years experience on a daily newspaper may apply to two-week series or advertising departments of newspapers. to attend a seminar. Neither the Nieman Fellowships nor 18 NIEMAN REPORTS the A.P.I. has a formal educational requirement for appli­ located at institutions with outstanding libraries, with cants. nationally recognized departments in the humanities and Both of these centers-through different procedures-rep­ the social sciences, with rigid requirements for the first two resent professional education at its finest-continuing edu­ years' work in the liberal arts, with adequate budgets for cation for active practitioners. the journalism units, with staff . members interested and actively engaged in research as well as in teaching and serv­ Up to this point, this discussion of professional education ice, will serve the nation's newspapers and other media of for journalism in the United States has been a factual one. mass communication far better than one hundred fifty to one Statements and figures are accurate, to the best of my hundred seventy-five schools, many of which are inadequate­ knowledge. Few if any of the statements would arouse dis­ ly staffed and supported. agreement among my colleagues. I concluded my remarks by asking my academic col­ I shall close with some personal opinions, based upon leagues to return to their campuses, re-examine their stand­ twenty-nine years of experience as a teacher of journalism ards, study their curricula, check their admission and gradu­ in two state universities-The Ohio State University and ation requirements and then ask themselves: The University of North Carolina. I am a product of pro­ 'Are the journalism standards on my campus as high as fessional education for journalism. Over the years I have standards in other departments and specifically are they fought for and defended professional education for journal­ as high as standards in the other professional schools?' ism as a student, working newspaperman, teacher, univers­ If the answer was in the negative, I suggested that they ity a:dministrative officer, and for the past four years as take steps to terminate journalism instruction. head of a school of journalism founded in 1924. To date, no institution has decided to end instruction in Professional education for journalism in the United States journalism. On the contrary, at least one institution has is sound educationally, despite what its critics allege. At its announced that it is opening a 'curriculum in journalism' best in institutions where teaching, research, and service are with a teacher who will also handle the institution's public blended in their proper proportions based upon the charac­ relations. ter of the institution and the needs of the communication Recently there has been a noticeable trend towards the media served, it stands on a par with professional education appointment of practitioners rather than scholars or scien­ for law, medicine, and the other learned professions. tists to positions of influence and responsibility in schools of But in my opinion, and there are educators and editors journalism. The ideal background of a journalism school who disagree with me, education for journalism in this administrator should include both media experience and country has grown and is growing too rapidly for its own academic achievement. The pendulum in some instances good. Among the more than one hundred fifty schools and seem to be swinging back to the early practice where news­ departments of journalism there are many which offer poor­ paper background constituted the predominant characteris­ ly planned programs taught by poorly-prepared teachers. tic of deans, directors, and department chairmen. Many teachers are not interested in and do no research. The journalist has a high responsibility. The university Much of the course work does not compare favorably with administrator charged with the responsibility of educating university level requirements of other teaching disciplines. tomorrow's journalists has an even higher one, that of in­ Some schools perform no service for the newspapers of their sisting upon well-trained teachers, good instruction, research region other than the disservice of turning out inadequately on a high level, publication of significance, and service to trained graduates. the communication media based on sound research and State or federal regulation of schools of journalism is as proved procedures. unthinkable as government licensing of newspapers. The The truly professional schools of journalism, soundly constitutional guarantee of freedom of the press in the Bill based academically; with strict admission requirements and of Rights prevents licensing of newspapermen-a universal high standards for students; with interest in teaching, re­ practice for physicians, attorneys, dentists, and pharmacists. search and service, will continue to send a supply of well­ Self-policing or self-regulation is the only solution. Universi­ educated young men and women into the newspaper offices, ties on the one hand and newspapers on the other must the radio and television news departments, and the maga­ insist that professional training for journalism be truly pro­ zine and advertising offices of the nation. fessional. The integrity of the individual institution determines the In my presidential address to members of the Association quality of its product. The communication media are not for Education in Journalism delivered August 27 in Boston, unaware of the standing of institutions of higher learning. I said: In this knowledge may lie the solution to the problems of Forty or fifty truly professional schools of journalism, professional education for journalism. NIEMAN REPORTS 19 All the Views Fit to Print By Bruce Grant

Journalists are not equipped with the same ready-reck­ choice on Australians. At the time of Suez, British and oning facilities for assessing ideas as for assessing news. American disagreement made it possible for a newspaper to Ideas are more elusive. Has it been said before? Is it dra­ disagree with the Anglo-French action without feeling that matic or just silly? Is it dangerous? Ideas are more diffi­ it had stepped outside the West. As Mr. Menzies and Mr. cult to put headings on. Those great arbiters of public in­ Casey were thought to have different views, a critical line terest, the sub-editors, do not like ideas because they need in a newspaper was even less surprising. Newspapers could, quotations in the headings. It spoils the look of their work. according to the strength of their sympathies with the Contrary to general opinion, sub-editors are, I believe, artists United States or the United Kingdom, take a side-there­ at heart, not censors. But they work under pressure and by disagreeing or agreeing with the policy of the Menzies they are, quite properly, newspapermen. They work for government. newspapers. "The grandest of all musics," says an old In the same way the fact that British and American Gaelic proverb, "is the music of the thing that happens." policies on Communist China are publicly different enables The sub-editor loves this music; the hard fact sings for him. our newspapers to take their cue from Britain or America, The reject basket and the overmatter file are full of beau­ which will in turn make them critics or supporters of the tiful symphonies about things that might or should occur. Menzies government on this issue. There is another difference between the newspaper's I don't want to suggest that to have a choice of subser­ treatment of news and its treatment of ideas. Newspapers vience means that you have a policy of your own, but the inform the pubic of news-that is to say, the public at large split on some issues between America and Britain does help does not know about the news until it reads it in the papers Australians to think for themselves. -but they do not inform the public of something it does Another qualification: Australians and Australian news­ not know as far as ideas are concerned. They merely ex­ papers are much better informed about foreign affairs than press eventually what the public, or a large section of it, in 1938. I don't know how many people read leading has been thinking for some time. In the treatment of news, articles. I do know that in the last year I have written three the press is aggressive and adventurous. In the treatment of or four a week dealing with affairs outside this country. ideas, it is conservative, or, to use a more exact word, Also our press has much better contacts abroad now. The conformist. It is this conformity which I want to discuss. links we have established with British and American news­ First, let us look at foreign affairs: Some twenty years papers, the buying of commentaries from abroad, plus a ago Professor Ball wrote: "Australian newspapers have gradual upgrading of our own commentators, and a never propounded an Australian foreign policy; they have strengthening of world coverage of the Australian Associa. commended British foreign policy to Australians." ted Press through its Reuter connections-all these mean that I would like to think of an Australian foreign policy our press can have in its possession information and observa­ as an idea: it is perhaps not yet a fact. Is this idea recognized tions on important news with much greater speed and au­ and propounded by our newspapers now? Or, to bring Pro­ thority than before. This is an especially important con­ fessor Ball's statement up to date, do they only commend sideration in times of crises, when the tendency of Govern­ British and American foreign policies to Australians? I ment is toward restriction of information for security rea­ believe that, updated, he is still right. With some qualifica­ sons and the appeal to "take us on trust while the trouble tions: the fact that Britain and America have different 1s. on. " policies on some matters has thrown at least the effort of There is, however, one serious gap in our foreign news. In Europe and the Middle East, even to some extent in the Mr. Bruce Grant, chief leader writer of the Far East, our access to news and opinion is adequate, but Age, is at Harvard this year as the Associate Nieman Fel­ in Southeast Asia, where our responsibilities are greatest, our low from Australia. This is from the Arthur Norman information is least. As far as I am aware, no Australian Smith Lecture, which he delivered in August, 1958. These newspaper has a permanent full-time correspondent there, lectures, established in memory of one of the founders of although it may carry a staff of five, ten, or even twenty in the Australian Journalists' Association, have been delivered , with half as many in New York. Neither Austral­ annually since 1937 at the University of Melbourne by an ian newspapermen, with one or two specialist exceptions, Australian journalist. nor the Australian people are equipped to form what is 20 NIEMAN REPORTS called "public opinion" on our policy in Southeast Asia. It is vociferous in the USSR. Can Russians yell!" Then he lists partly cost, partly the feeling that Southeast Asia is not as some typical criticisms: scandalous mismanagement of an interesting (or should not be as interesting) to the Austral­ oil enterprise, broken promises on housing, flagrant viola­ ian public as the traditional centers of power, fashion, en­ tion of party democracy at a meeting, administrative bung­ tertainment, etc. It is also surely just plain lack of initiative. ling-"it is incomprehensible why this . . . has not pene­ This conservatism, which is the newspapers' own respon­ trated the consciousness of Comrade A verev, the Minister sibility, is accentuated by two other foreign affairs "factors:" of Finance, in the course of decades." It sounds very much One is the remoteness of Canberra from the nation's press. like our own press. Mr. Gunther comments: "One reason In London, as in most world capitals, the newspaper center why such widespread criticism is permitted-in fact encou­ of the country is also the political center. (Even Washing­ raged-is that it acts as a safety valve. Criticism seldom, if ton, though it is not New York, has the New York Times, ever, touches basic policy, or the fundamental concepts of the regime, but is directed against particular shortcomings. which has a national sale, and the Washington Post, which , is on the spot.) The morning after the Government in Lon­ don makes a decision, ten or more newspapers can be on Just how different is the role of the newspaper in West­ the Prime Minister's desk. Here we still publish in sep­ ern society, or, to keep to our own press, Australian society? arate states: it takes two or three days before press comment I submit that newspapers here do just the same: they criti­ makes its impact on Government. cize performance, practice, but they do not question the The second factor is the lack of intimacy between our basic premises of their society. To illustrate: Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition. One of The Monarchy is one of the staples of our society. I can­ the interesting tests of critical temperature in London dur­ not imagine an Australian newspaper advocating republi­ ing a crisis is the attitude of the Opposition. In general it can government. I do not think there is even likely to be boils down to this: if the Opposition publicly censures the any criticism of the performance of the Monarch. There Government in a foreign affairs crisis, something is wrong. may be from time to time a certain follow-up of criticisms It is known, or it is expected, that the Opposition leader will elsewhere, such as those made by Lord Altrincham, Mr. have been taken into the Prime Minister's confidence if the Muggeridge, Mr. Osborne and others. But the perform­ matter is really serious. If the Opposion still decides to oppose, ances criticized are always those of the Monarch's advisers. it is clearly an important issue of policy. The same gui­ Certainly the principle of Monarchy is never questioned. dance for newspapers is not easily gained from Canberra. This is so obviously a fact that there is no point in pursu­ It is well enough known that the personal relationship be­ ing it, but it was not always so. I do not refer to the well­ tween Mr. Menzies and Dr. Evatt makes this kind of con­ known dislike of the Georges by the British press, but to sultation difficult. We do not know, then, when the Oppo· Australia at a later date. Read our press at the time the sition opposes, whether it is habit or conviction. We can Australian Republican Union was in full swing (1890's to never be sure that it knows as much as the Government and 1914) and you will find a more skeptical evaluation of the decides to oppose just the same. Monarch. The passing of the Labor Daily in , I It is not, however, in the field of foreign affairs that an think in the '30's, was the end on an era. examination of the newspaper's ideological role is most in­ Religion, particularly as expressed by the Christian teresting. A more basic analysis of the function of the press Church, is another staple unquestioningly supported by the in dealing with ideas affords glimpses of the full problem press. All daily newspapers are prepared to give a lot of confronting the responsible daily newspaper editor. space to what is said in the churches, but not what is said To begin rather provocatively, it is frequently said, especi­ against them. The non-Christian and the anti-Christian ally by Western newspapers, that the press in Russia is not viewspoints are not expressed in newspapers, except impli­ free, that it is not allowed to criticize. This is a misleading citly perhaps, and certainly not by them. Yet to what extent generalization. There is a lot of criticism in Russia and are we really a Christian community? About half the other Communist countries, much of it in the press. But it population never or rarely goes to church. According to is a technical or mechanical criticism, directed against the the Current Affairs Bulletin, "Churchgoing in Australia," government or the bureaucracy for failure of performance. only 63 per cent believe in an afterlife. This percentage in It may be exceedingly active, but it is never fundamental. the United Kingdom, incidentally, is 49, and an English poll There is no questioning of the ideological foundations of of 1957 showed that nearly 30 per cent of the population did society. Communism is the established truth. Communists not believe, or was not sure, that Christ was the son of God. can be criticized only for failing to give it full expression. I suggest there are signs here of a changing attitude towards In Inside Russia Today John Gunther writes of the Rus­ religion in Christian countries. How is this to be recognized sian press: "Protests and complaints are incessant and by a newspaper editor? NIEMAN REPORTS 21 There is no newspaper in Australia which does not think cal, will print articles on scientific and religious subjects that parliamentary democracy is the best form of govern­ which, if translated, would raise the hair of Mi"or readers. ment; at least if there is it never says so. No daily news­ (On the other hand, it is not written for people who enjoy paper would advocate a Communist form of government, knowing that on the previous day it was revealed in court­ democratic centralism, guided democracy or whatever it to quote a famous Mirror headline-that WIFE IN might be called. None would advocate a fascist dictatorship. SLACKS WHO SAID NO CANED BY HUSBAND At least, these prospects are as unlikely as that of a Com­ WHO THOUGHT HE WAS HITLER.) The Times munist newspaper arguing for responsible cabinet will debate in leaders the rights and wrongs of artificial government. insemination, or of peace-at-any-price. It even raised doubts No newspaper in Australia advocates an economic sys­ about the Queen's choice of Mr. Macmillan in preference to tem other than free enterprise capitalism. Newspapers have Mr. Butler as Prime Minister. come to accept State enterprise in a mixed economy, but 3. England has Trust (roughly, non profit) newspapers. there is none advocating socialism as an economic policy The Times and the Manchester Guardian are both limited nor, of course, as a way of life. commercial enterpises. The most clear cut Trust newspaper You can argue that it is not the function of the press, is the Sunday Observer. A labor paper, the Daily Herald, here, in Russia or anywhere else, to sponsor ideas other is presumably socialist, and the Daily Mirror, is indepen­ than those generally accepted by the society in which it dent Left. functions. Its job is to record day to day events, not to 4. The Labor party split in Australia has created special chart man's destiny. But newspapers do pronounce on man difficulties. No newspaper now supports Labor, partly be­ and his destiny. Some leader writers do practically nothing cause of the vocal campaign against Dr. Evatt, partly be­ else. At Christmas, Easter, Anzac Day, royal birthdays, cause while Labor is divided it does not offer an alternative visits, etc. newspapers customarily say that certain values government. must be guarded, treasured, honored, fought for and so on. But the fundamental question for the newspaper editor And these values are always the accepted traditional ones. in Australia is the same question faced by editors in all other parts of the Western World. Can our society be pre­ served without changing it? The point I am raising is whether newspapers provide a It is my belief that the duty of questioning established real service to their society by this unquestioning acceptance. truths should not be shirked by the press in the broader Or, to put it another way, what has happened to what we education of the public. N aturally, the peculiar nature of say is the fundamental value of Western civilization-free­ journalism is limiting. We haven't the time to dig deeply. dom to inquire, to question, to differ? It is said that today The basic training of a journalist enables him to record people do not want to question and inquire: they want com­ quickly and accurately what he sees and hears; this reporting fort, they want to fit in, they want to work and live in the function is still all-important, in spite of the hand-out sys­ certainty that they are doing their duty by God and all tem, public relations, and the more immediate contact of right-thinking men and women. They do not want to radio and television. Nor does the public, reading its daily change the world, but to accommodate themselves to the paper, expect to be treated to the same imponderables which part of it they are in. In this sort of society the search for people in the lecture theater might hope to turn over in their truth becomes dangerous. minds. Also laws concerning libel, sedition, blasphemy, and For Australian newspapers there are certain special handi­ so on, are constant companions at the journalist's elbow. caps: The slogan, "If we think it, we print it" sounds romantic 1. There is no serious or intellectual weekly press. The but it is injudicious advice. influence on Fleet Street of journals like the Spectator, Eco­ There is no doubt, however, that newspapers do have a nomist and New Statesman is considerable. What they, persuasive and educative power. I suggest that it be used, or any one of them, may say is often news for the dailies, not to assert our traditions as dogma, but to question and and in that way the sophisticated level of inquiry conducted evaluate them, on the assumption that, if they are found in the weekly journals finds its way into the mass circula­ wanting in today's circumstances, they can be reformed to tion press. We now have the Observer, published by Con­ meet the challenge. And I would suggest that this is not solidated Press in Sydney, which I hope is a beginning. idealistic crusading, but realistic politics. 2. Some newspapers abroad can work at a more sophis­ We are fond of saying that this is an age of ideological ticated level, because the population is big enough to pro­ conflict, but what does this mean? We cannot expect in vide readers for a newspaper of limited appeal. The Lon­ Western society to match the drive of Communism, which don Times, which I don't suppose anyone would call radi- comes from its revolutionary spirit, its newness, its intoler- 22 NIEMAN REPORTS ance of opposition. We have behind us a tradition of free­ morality and civilization, but no established church. We dom centuries old. I do not see why we cannot keep our are still innocent in our humanism, still excited by progress, faith in the essence of democracy-that man can govern still capable of realizing that the world is more than we himself, continually emancipate himself, because he is had supposed it to be. We are skeptical, but not cynical. inventive and creative. This is ground for growth and expansion, not defense and One does not expect newspapers to express revolutionary fear. We can question in confidence, not in the anguish or ideas-in this context, Communist ideas, if you like. While despair which is fashionable in some Western countries. Communism remains lawful, it is not a crime to think as a We can believe in our power to devise new values if the Communist, but it is not a very profitable pursuit-nor even old ones no longer meet our need. very promising, since it is not a common belief that Aus­ G. K. Chesterton has the right answer: "Ideas are danger­ tralia would provide fertile ground for Communist ideas. ous," he said, "but the man to whom they are least dan­ Our danger is not revolution-at least I don't know what gerous is the man of ideas. He is acquainted with them the prophets are saying, but that is the public impression. and moves among them like a lion-tamer.... The man to It is rather, I think, conformity,-that we shall, by lack of whom they are most dangerous is the man of no ideas. The vigor and initiative in our minds, lose our democratic initia­ man of no ideas will find the first idea fly to his head like tive, allow ourselves to become a dictatorship of the com­ wine to the head of a teetotaller." placent and the second-hand. Australia itself offers good The point is quite simple: ideas are dangerous but the ground for the democratic virtues. We have religion, which greater danger in a democracy is that we, the journalists, throws light on the human condition and is a support to and the reading public, should become afraid of them.

The Lost Art (Continued from page 2)

Bay State, exasperated by legislative attempts to share the The Times news-feature column, "Random Notes from metropolitan Boston transit deficit with the rest of the Washington," carries the sort of item Professor Zeisler par­ state and equalize the rate for compulsory car insurance be­ ticularly wants, the ironic anecdote or comment on the tween rural districts and cities with heavy traffic. political dilemmas of our time. In February, after another But, although the quips and cracks don't very often make U.S. satellite had failed to make it, this column reported a me laugh out loud, I still find plenty of evidence in news story going the rounds. Two derelicts passed the Washing­ columns that good newspapermen today are just as keen­ ton Monument in bitter weather, w~en some workmen at witted as their predecessors and that the irony that flourish­ the base, to keep themselves warm, had lit a fire in an oil es in every healthy city room has not been atomized by the drum. The pair watched the flames shooting out from the H-bomb. Consider the good gray New York Times. James oil drum and one shook his head. "They'll never get it up," Reston's editorial attacks on governmental good intentions he said. in high places sometimes strike me as really witty; even True enough, there are many newspapers published today dedicated Republicans might have enjoyed that column in total solemnity, where the only humor is completely un­ last spring on the threat of in@tration into government by intentional. But even in the golden age of the comedy of Phi Beta Kappa. It is chiefly in the regular news depart­ illiteracy, Artemus Ward and Petroleum V. Nasby were ex­ ments, however, that I am apt to come upon what I call ceptions, not the rule. A true humorist seems to me as rare humor. The financial section does a feature on Montgomery as a true poet; Will Rogers was unique and so is E. B. Ward catalogue bargains-three pounds of worker bees and White, and we must continue to hope that such rare spirits one Italian queen for only $5.45; Elizabeth Fowler turns the will encounter the special circumstances in which their gifts tables on the New Yorker by covering its annual meeting can best flourish. In the mean time I am more than con­ of stockholders a la our-man-Stanley. A headline writer, tent to let the professional wisecrackers stay with television confronting a picture of a weird something moving up the and to applaud the editors who encourage able reporters Hudson, asks "What has 14 Legs, Is 7 Stories Tall and and desk men to share with the reading public their saving Floats? A New Pier, of Course." sense of the ironies of the life they chronicle. NIEMAN REPORTS 23 Why :Should News 'Come in 5-Minute Pacliages? By Edward R. Murrow

(from Mr. Murrow's address to th~ radio and televi­ ence of the older media." If they but knew it, they are sion news directors convention, Chicago, Oct. 15.) building those traditions, creating those precedents every day. Each time they yield to a voice from Washington or It is my desire if not my duty to talk with some candor any political pressure, each time they eliminate something about what is happening to radio and television in this that might offend some section of the community, they are generous and capacious land. . . • creating their own body of precedent and tradition. They I am seized with an abiding fear regarding what these are in fact, not content to be "half safe." two instruments are doing to our society, our culture and Nowhere is this better illustrated than by the fact that our heritage. . . . the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission I invite your attention to the television schedules of all publicly prods broadcasters to engage in their legal right to networks between the hours of eight and eleven p.m. editorialize. Of course, to undertake an editorial policy, Eastern Time. Here you will find only fleeting and spas­ overt and clearly labelled, and obviously unsponsored, re­ modic reference to the fact that this nation is in mortal quires a station or a network to be responsible. Most sta­ danger. There are, it is true, occasional informative pro­ tions today probably do not have the manpower to assume grams presented in that intellectual ghetto on Sunday after­ this responsibility, but the manpower could be recruited. noons. But during the daily peak viewing periods, tele­ Editorials would not be profitable; if they had a cutting edge vision in the main insulates us from the realities of the they might even offend. It is much easier, much less trouble­ world in which we live. If this state of affairs continues, some to use the money-making machine of television and we may alter an advertising slogan to read: "Look Now, radio merely as a conduit through which to channel any­ Pay Later." For surely we shall pay for using this most thing that is not libelous, obscene or defamatory. In that powerful instrument of communication to insulate the citi­ way one has the illusion of power without responsibility. zenry from the hard and demanding realities which must So far as radio-that most satisfying and rewarding instru­ be faced if we are to survive .... ment-is concerned, the diagnosis of its difficulties is rather I am entirely persuaded that the American public is more easy. And obviously I speak only of news and information. reasonable, restrained and more mature than most of our In order to progress it need only go backward. To the time industry's program planners believe. Their fear of con­ when singing commericals were not allowed on news re­ troversy is not warranted by the evidence .... ports, when there was no middle commercial in a fifteen­ There have been hints that somehow competition for the minute news report; when radio was rather proud, alert advertising dollar has caused the critics of print to gang and fast. I recently asked a network official: Why this up on television and radio. This reporter has no desire to great rash of five-minute news reports (including three com­ defend the critics. They have space in which to do that on mercials) on week ends? He replied: "Because that seems their own behalf. But it remains a fact that the newspapers to be the only thing we can sell." and magazines are the only instruments of mass communi­ In this kind of complex and confusing world, you can't cation which remain free from sustained and regular criti­ tell very much about the why of the news in broadcast cal comment. If the network spokesmen are so anguished where only three minutes is available for news. The only about what appears in print, let them come forth and en­ man who could do that was Elmer Davis, and his kind gage in a little sustained and regular comment regarding isn't about any more. If radio news is to be regarded as a newspapers and magazines. It is an ancient and sad fact that commodity, only acceptable when salable, and only when most people in network television, and radio, have an ex­ packaged to fit the advertising appropriation of a sponsor, aggerated regard for what appears in print. And there have then I don't care what you call it-1 say it isn't news. been cases where executives have refused to make even One of the minor tragedies of television news and infor­ private comment on a program for which they were re­ mation is that the networks will not even defend their vital sponsible, until they had read the reviews in print. This is interests. When my employer, C.B.S., through a combina­ hardly an exhibition of confidence. tion of enterprise and good luck, did an interview with The oldest excuse of the networks for their timidity is Nikita Khrushchev, the President uttered a few ill-chosen, their youth. Their spokesman say: "We are young; we uninformed words on the subject, and the network prac­ have not developed the traditions, nor acquired the experi- tically apologized. This produced a rarity. Many news- 24 NIEMAN REPORTS papers defended the C.B.S. right to produce the program dividual stations should operate as philanthropies. But I and commended it for initiative. But the other networks can find nothing in the Bill of Rights or the Communica­ remained silent. tions Act which says that they must increase their net profits Likewise, when John Foster Dulles, by personal decree, each year, lest the republic collapse .... banned American journalists from going to Communist The question is this: Are the big corporations who pay China, and subsequently offered contradictory explanations. the freight for radio and television programs wise to use For his fiat the networks entered only a mild protest. Then that time exclusively for the sale of goods and services? they apparently forgot the unpleasantness. Can it be that If we go on as we are, we are protecting the mind of this national industry is content to serve the public interest the American public from any real contact with the menac­ only with the trickle of news that comes out of Hong ing world that squeezes in upon us. We are engaged in a Kong? To leave its viewers in ignorance of the cataclysmic great experiment to discover whether a free public opinion changes that are occurring in a nation of six hundred million can devise and direct methods of managing the affairs of the people? I have no illusions about the difficulties of report­ nation. We may fail. But we are handicapping ourselves ing from dictatorship; but our British and French allies needlessly. have been better served-in their public interest-with some Let us have a little competition. Not only in selling soap, very useful information from their reporters in Communist cigarettes and automobiles, but in informing a troubled, China. apprehensive but receptive public. Why should not each One of the basic troubles with radio and television news of the twenty or thirty big corporations which dominate is that both instruments have grown up as an incompatible radio and television, decide that they will give up one or combination of show business, advertising and news. Each two regularly scheduled programs each year, turn the time of the three is a rather bizarre and demanding profession. over to the networks, and say in effect: "This is a tiny tithe, And when you get all three under one roof, the dust never just a little bit of our profits. On this particular night we settles. The top management of the networks, with a few aren't going to try to sell cigarettes or automobiles; this notable exceptions, has been trained in advertising, re­ is merely a gesture to indicate our belief in the importance search, sales or show business. But by the nature of the of ideas." The networks should, and I think would, pay corporate structure, they also make the final and crucial for the cost of producing the program. The advertiser, the decisions having to do with news and public affairs. Fre­ sponsor, would get name credit, but would have nothing quently they have neither the time nor the competence to do to do with the content of the program. Would this blemish this. the corporate image? Would the stockholders object? I Upon occasion, economics and editorial judgment are in think not. For if the premise upon which our pluralistic conflict. And there is no law which says that dollars will society rests-which as I understand it is, that if the people be defeated by duty. Not so long ago the President of the are given sufficient undiluted information, they will then United States delivered a television address to the nation. somehow, even after long, sober second thoughts reach the He was discoursing on the possibility or probability of war right decision. If that premise i~ wrong, then not only the between this nation and the Soviet Union and Communist corporate image but the corporations are done for. China-a reasonably compelling subject. The networks­ Just once in a while let us exalt the importance of ideas C.B.S. and N.B.C.-delayed that broadcast for an hour and and information. Let us dream to the extent of saying that fifteen minutes. If this decision was dictated by anything on a given Sunday night the time normally occupied by Ed other than financial reasons, the networks didn't deign to Sullivan is given over to a clinical survey of the state of explain those reasons. That hour-and-fifteen-minute delay, American education, and a week or two later the time norm­ by the way, is about twice the time required for an I.C.B.M. ally used by Steve Allen is devoted to a thorough-going to travel from the Soviet Union to major targets in the study of American policy in the Middle East. Would the United States. It is difficult to believe that this decision corporate image of their respective sponsors be damaged? was made by men who love, respect and understand news. Would the stockholders rise up in their wrath and complain? Potentially, we have in this country a free enterprise sys­ Would anything happen other than that a few million tem of radio and television which is superior to any other. people would have received a little illumination on subjects But to achieve its promise, it must be both free and enter­ that may well determine the future of this country, and prising. There is no suggestion here that networks or in- therefore the future of the corporations? NIEMAN REPORTS 26 What Happens in a Newspaper Strike?

New Yorli Without Papers

The shutdown of New York's nine major newspapers showed that while television had not added any appreciable led a task force of eighty students at the Columbia Univer~ number of viewers, radio added thousands. It was found that ity Graduate School of Journalism to check into the princi­ many listeners-prospective Christmas shoppers who had pal effects of the newspaper blackout. no department store ads to read in newspapers-tuned in They found that the city government was still running on radio to find what stores were offering. but running in low gear, business houses showed everything Television ratings for regularly scheduled shows were from "tremendous" losses to unexpected gains, street corner little changed. Such programs are generally signed up for Santa Clauses got fewer alms, fewer persons were attend­ extended periods. There were no evidences of increased ing funerals, and girls were having "fits and spasms" be­ TV audiences. cause they couldn't get their wedding and engagement One of the arresting discoveries made in the survey was notices into print. the effect of the newspaper strike on city administration. The students concentrated their operation on Dec. 17, The complex machinery of big city government was found the eighth day of the strike called by the independent Union to be slowed down without the spotlight of publicity. of Newspapers and Mail Deliverers. The city-wide picture Fewer public hearings were called, and smaller audiences presented a collection of contradictions, irritations and attended. There was also a sharp drop in the number of oddities, but the general reaction echoed a New York Board official announcement and a virtual stoppage of delegations of Trade finding that the strike had produced "irretrievable" calling on Mayor Robert F. Wagner. damage. One seasoned observer remarked: Some stores reported no loss in sales and others claimed "You can tell there's a newspaper strike. Nobody made 15 per cent and worse in sales drops. Theatres, movie a speech in the City Council yesterday." houses, travel agencies, used-car outlets, realty offices and One of the few benefits resulting from the strike was gambling operations reported an "up" pattern for some, felt by the city's Department of Sanitation. Trash col­ "down" pattern for others. lections, which normally run at an average of 12,500 tons Newspapers hit by the strike had a total circulation of daily, were 2,000 tons lighter. There was also a 25 per cent 5,700,000. They were the New York Times, Herald Tribune, drop in litter basket collections. News, Mirror, Journal-American, World-Telegram and Sun, "The city is considerably cleaner since the strike," a de­ Post and the Long Island Press and Long Island Star-Journal. partment spokesman said. "It takes only one newspaper For New Yorkers accustomed to this rich newspaper diet blown by the wind to make an entire city block look dirty." to and from work every day the strike brought poor substi­ Some businesses and charities that depend heavily on tutes and the complaints were bitter. newspaper advertising and publicity reported that their in­ Many adults bought comic books to keep occupied, ac­ comes had been cut 50 per cent and more. Two associations, cording to a news dealer at Grand Central Terminal. whose members included 200 employment agencies and "People will buy anything with print on it," Henry eleven individual agencies in Manhattan, said that the Hirsch, a news dealer at the corner of Thirty-fourth Street business of filling jobs had declined from 35 to 75 per cent and A venue of the Americas, said. since the strike began. But the news dealers, who found they could sell 25-cent Some theatres reported long queues of customers, but magazines in place of S-cent newspapers, were not all happy. others declared that depression days were back. The box­ Magazine distributors estimated that 10,000 of the city's office manager of an off-Broadway theatre complained that 16,000 news stands had closed. the newspaper shutdown had "killed business." At Madi­ A survey of Manhattan news dealers brought estimates of son Square Garden drops in attendance at sports events a 75 to 80 per cent decline in business during the first week ranged from 3 per cent to 25 per cent. of the strike. One news dealer estimated that about $900 a Vacation-seekers were apparently affected by the strike. week usually represented newspaper sales and only $100 a Some travel agencies reported a 20 to 50 per cent drop in week came from magazine sales. holiday bookings. A survey of four leading TV and radio rating services Funeral directors reported no change in business. But 26 NIEJMAN REPORTS without public notices in newspapers to announce deaths, news service, which goes to sixty-six newspapers. A special there were 20 per cent fewer mourners. radio and television service had been organized, serving fifteen outlets in the New York area. The first and hardest hit by the strike, of course, were This service supplied Herald Tribune news and columns the newspapers themselves, and those who worked for to stations without charge-as a "public service," according them. to Arthur Hadley, who was in charge of it, and also "to On Dec. 17, the day the Columbia survey was made, keep our name before the public." negotiations to end the strike had bogged down. The night At the New York Daily News, all mechanical employes before members of the Newspaper and Mail Deliverers and 75 per cent of the editorial employes had been fur­ Union had shouted down a proposal that they vote again loughed, according to Richard W. Clarke, the executive on the same publishers' offer they had rejected a week be­ editor. fore. "Work is continuing on the Sunday magazine sections," The two sides met separately that day at the offices of the Mr. Clarke said, "and a handful of writers are completing Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, 30th Street jobs previously assigned." and Ninth Avenue, but remained deadlocked. All the News promotions were feeling the absence of At the New York Times, members of the production and publicity. These included the Golden Gloves, Silver Skates distribution departments were laid off. Members of the and the Sally Joy Brown Fund. other departments, though, were working even though no As at the Times, incoming calls to the News Information newspaper was being produced. Services had increased-100 per cent, according to Edward Half of the newspaper's local reporting staff had been as­ Brothers, who is in charge. He noted, however, that in­ signed to the news desk of the Times' radio station, WQXR, quiries were declining as the strike continued. writing and editing reports for greatly expanded news At the New York Mirror all mechanical employes and broadcasts. most of the editorial staff was furloughed. Some editorial These broadcasts also included taped recordings by Times employes, however, were assisting radio station Wll\1'S, correspondents from abroad. which broadcasts news from the Mirror offices. And others The Times also was making plans-for the following were maintaining teletypes and keeping files current. day-to put its moving sign in Times Square in operation A Mirror Christmas charity fund had considerably at 9 in the morning rather than 4:30 in the afternoon. The fewer contributions than last year. sign flashes, in lights icrcling the Times Tower, running TheMirror comics and other features were being read news bulletins. over the radio, and it was planned to run brief resumes Another outgrowth of the strike was a tremendous in­ to bring readers up to date when publication was resumed. crease in the number of telephone calls to newspapers in At the World-Telegram and Sun and the Journal­ search of information. American, on the day th:e survey was made, about 80 Jules Geller, supervisor of the Times information office, per cent of the regular working force at each paper was estimated that incoming calls had increased at least "ten­ on furlough. fold" since the shutdown began. The inquiries generally, Charles L. Gould, assistant publisher of the Journal­ he said, were about plays, concerts, movies or the latest American, gave a categorical "No" to a rumor that the stock market news. Journal-American and Mirror might merge because of The flow of news into the Times continued much as it the financial damage suffered during the strike. had before the strike. But Emanuel R. Freedman, foreign He pointed out, however, that there was a considerable news editor, said correspondents had been ordered to duplication of facilities between the two Hearst-owned pub­ "tighten their files a bit." ' lications, and that some of this might be eliminated after Staff members not doing special work for WQXR were the strike. preparing what were termed "catch-up pages"-single sheet At the World-Telegram and Sun only 20 or 30 of the editions of each day's news, consisting of a front page and normal 130-man staff was to be seen on the day of the sur­ a page two. vey. Lee B. Wood, executive editor, said that his men It was planned to issue and distribute these within a day were still "keeping up with the news." after the newspaper resumed publication. Reporters were manning "fixed posts" in the city and The New York Herald Tribune laid off many city staff were continuing to call stories into the office, he said. And members, according to Luke Carroll, news editor. But a wire service reports were being received and processed. flow of news from national and foreign correspondents At the New York Post, all but a skeleton force had been was kept up, primarily for the paper's edition and its laid off at the start of the strike. Even James A. Wechsler, NIEMAN REPORTS 27 the editor, took a fulough without pay. On the day of Miss Helen R. Satterly, director of the school system's the survey only six persons were in the city room. Bureau of Libraries, said: "It just makes you feel thwarted The strike tremendously increased the demand for the to be without a newspaper in school." specialized newspapers and for weekly news magazines. Spokesmen for the New York office of the U.S. Weather These papers and magazines were quickly sold out Bureau, the New York Telephone Co., and several private wherever they were available. weather services all said that their telephone and radio For foreign correspondents the loss of newspapers was business had not increased perceptibly. a major setback. Many of them depended on clipping the Calls to the Weather Bureau's public information serv­ newspapers for news to send back to their home countries. ice remained at the pre-strike level of 800 to 1,000 a day. They were forced to do the best they could by transcribing "I wouldn't like a publisher to hear this," an employee at radio reports. the Weather Bureau said, "but newspapers really aren't Both radio and television substantially increased their our most important avenue of distribution." news coverage and crowded what extra advertising they One news dealer, Harry Regamann, said sales of out-of­ could into limited air space. The biggest bonanza came town newspapers were up ten-fold. for the radio stations, because most television time had "It's tremendous," he said. "We're selling about 20,000 been sold before the strike began. papers a day. Before the strike, we sold about 2,000 a day," he said. Several full-scale investigations of municipal problems Philadelphia and Boston papers increased their daily such as slum clearance, school construction and corruption shipments to New York stands from five to ten times the in the Department of Welfare that had been the object of normal supply, and the dealers had no trouble selling heavy newspaper attention prior to the strike slowed to a ,them. standstill in the absence of publicity. "TV Guide sells out the first day it's on the stands," School officials said the lack of daily newspapers was said Henry Garfinkel, president of the Union News Co. hurting New York's public education system. Five hundred copies of Life Magazine, normally a suf­ "The absence of major local newspapers is a deplorable ,ficient supply for the entire week, were sold in eight situation in which both teachers and students are suffer­ hours at the Penn Station stand. ing," George Lent, assistant administrative director for The biggest problem of news dealers still in operation the Board of Education, said. was getting enough magazines to meet the demand. Mr. Lent emphasized that, in addition to the schools be­ Julius Baer, a Times Square news dealer, said he could ing prevented from using newspapers in their teaching sell five times the number of magazines he had "but we programs, the strike had created other difficulties. can't get a large quantity." "The thing the Board of Education fears most is that an Kenneth L. Demarest, city editor of the Bergen Evening emergency will occur in which there will be a need for Record, Hackensack, N.J., said his paper was selling 6,000 quick communication to the public," he said. "It would more newspapers daily in New York City. The Port be very difficult without newspapers to notify students Chester, N.Y., Daily Item also reported a circulation and parents that schools were closed because of sickness 111crease. or weather." Representatives of the Newark, N.J., Evening News, "Both teachers and students depended on the W arid­ Newsday of Garden City, L. I., and the White Plains, Telegram and Sun's daily school page to keep informed N.Y., Reporter-Dispatch said they had not increased their on school news and policies," he said. shipments of newspapers to New York City. Both the The greatest problem, in the opinion of most school of­ White Plains and Port Chester papers altered their formats ficials, however, was the difficulty of conducting social to carry more business and national news during the studies classes without the aid of newspapers. strike. Mr. Lent estimated that 270,000 of the city's 300,000 A survey of seven community and foreign language secondary students in 213 junior and senior high schools newspapers in New York City showed that circulation had make some use of the daily papers. Newspapers are also doubled and advertising was up 25 to 50 per cent on some used to some extent in the elementary grades, he said. papers. "Both teachers and students are much less informed Two Spanish language papers, El Diario and La Prensa, about what has been going on since the newspapers stopped added news pages in English as a substitute for the larger publication," Mr. Lent said. "They are not completely in New York dailies. The National Enquirer, a Sunday the dark, but there's no doubt that a knowledge of current weekly feature paper, came out with two special editions events is an important part of our education." each week. 28 NIEMAN REPORTS Stanley Ross, editor of El Diario, said the paper's circula­ Transit Authority, said three stores-S. Klein, Abraham & tion had jumped from 70,000 daily to about 150,000 dur­ Straus and the Peerless Camera Company-had paid from ing the strike. Advertising linage increased 25 per cent $500 to $625 a sign to place from two to four advertisements to 30,000 lines a week, he said. in subway cars for one day. Klein's in particular caused a The weekly News doubled its circulation a stir by putting up 30,000 advertising posters under their week after the strike began, said James L. Hicks, execu­ agreement with the subways. tive editor. Other stores relied on handbills, posters and other de­ Variety, newspaper of show business increased its circu­ vices. One speculated on putting out a shopping news bulle­ lation 30 to 40 per cent, said Eddie McCaffrey, circulation tin. At Stern's, a pretty girl sat in the window and chalked manager. up specials on a bulletin board. One publicity man, anxious But few of the smaller papers wanted to continue filling to keep his clients in the public eye, hired a sandwich the gap left by the Newspaper strike. board man and had him stalking up and down Madison Restaurants, stock exchanges and transportation firms Avenue carrying items that would have been offered nor­ began issuing their own news summaries for their patrons. mally to newspaper columnists. Both the New York Stock Exchange and the American William R. Sloan, secretary of the Fifth Avenue Asso­ Stock Exchange issued small newspapers to provide closing ciation, said specialty shops and smaller stores had been hit market prices to their members. hard by the strike. "The stores catering to the particular cus- One-page news summaries containing closing prices tomer are the real losers," he asserted. - of 25 leading stocks and even a synopsis of comic strips A spot check of auto show rooms in Manhattan and the were distributed by transportation firms and restaurants. Bronx showed drops in sales of from 5 to 70 per cent. The Long Island Press, one of the nine papers that were One real estate agent, who said his firm depended almost shut down, set up a news bulletin board at Pennsylvania entirely on classified advertising to attract customers, esti­ Station, and news sheets were attached to 7,250 menus mated his business had dropped nearly 50 per cent. in Schrafft Restaurants throughout the city. One large brokerage firm, which deals with the small in­ Harvard University students sent 10,000 copies of their vestors, reported a 15 per cent drop in its trading volume. newspapers, the Crimson, from Cambridge, Mass. to New An official remarked: "We are basically a service organiza­ York City, and New York University students converted tion. If people can't follow the market, they do not buy." their weekly newspaper, the Square Journal into a daily The continued publication of the Wall Street Journal general news report. and the Journal of Commerce served to cushion the blow The city's business, usually at its peak during the holiday for such brokerage houses, however. season, slumped. The book business was booming. One big store said the The lack of newspaper advertising as a sales stimulant average daily sales during the Christmas season, in a normal cut into trade at department stores, specialty shops, automo­ year, were $4,000-and this year they had jumped to $13,000. bile dealers, real estate firms, employment agencies, waste This store's experience was confirmed by rivals, who weren't paper businesses, newspaper clipping services and many as ready to give out their own figures. others. One funeral director said, "Because of the newspaper The larger book stores reported sales were up, particularly strike, families are finding it very difficult to notify friends in the paper backs. News magazines were selling as much of both the death and the services." as 40 per cent more in the city area. The specialized papers Nathan Levy, senior administrative assistant in the like the Wall Street Journal were so much in demand that Office of the City Administrator, said some delay might re­ people almost came to blows over their copies and one man, sult in the settlement of estates if the courts insisted on legal near the Columbia University area, ran several blocks to publication in one of the major newspapers. catch up with a delivery at his favorite newsstand. Philip A Donahue, chief clerk of the Surrogate Court, One store executive conceded glumly, "Our ads carried agreed that some delay in court litigation might occur if us for a while but now we're really beginning to feel the the strike continued for a long period of time. full effects of the newspaper strike." A rival store, for pub­ Hugh Riker, an executive of the C. E. Hooper Agency, lication, claimed business was good but an executive, when the only rating service concentrating exclusively on pressed, remarked, "We don't like to say so, but we're really radio, said radio ratings had been going up steadily since hurt." the start of the strike. Some department stores adopted various expedients to "Radio is furnishing more news faster," he said. "I re­ make up for the loss of advertising. member last July during the Lebanon incident. Because John J. Woods, promotion consultant for the New York of the war scare then, more people turned to radio for NIEMAN REPORTS 29 news. I'd say the ratings jumped almost 10 per cent." Bill Fields, press agent for "The Gazebo," which opened This view was backed up by Alan Klein of Pulse, Inc. last Dec. 12 at the Lyceum Theater, said, "We probably He said people were turning to radio as a means of find­ spent twice as much for advertising (chiefly on radio and ing what stores were offering for Christmas. TV) as we would have if the papers had been printing." "Big department stores that ordinarily advertise in pap­ Grahame Greene's "The Power and the Glory" that open­ ers are turning to radio," he said. "These stores have a ed Dec. 10 at , suffered even more than lot of goods on hand-big daily sales-specials. They've "Gazebo." got to let the people know. Nat Parnes, manager of the Phoenix, said the producers "Radio was the only medium left open. Mind, now, I would try to reach the public through radio and an expand­ said was. As of right now, you can't buy time. You have ed mailing list. He added that he expected to double his to get on the waiting list. newspaper advertising when publication is resumed, "for "A friend of mine is in radio, and he told me his busi­ the first few days anyway." ness almost tripled since the strike." Archibald MacLeish's "J.B.," was hailed by reviewers, Radio was said to have recorded the largest advertising with no place to print their reviews. The theatre rushed increase, because most TV advertising time was sold out Brooks Atkinson's review and others to TV and radio sta­ before the strike began. tions. There were long lines at the box office. WOR sales manager expected an 8 to 10 per cent in­ In off-Broadway circles, the situation was much grim­ crease in December advertising. mer. "The department stores were first to use the radio, but Peter Neufeld, box-office manager at the Sheridan Square now the manufacturers are calling. We now have a di­ Playhouse where "Time of the Cuckoo" is playing, said versified list of new accounts ranging from men's cosmetics the newspaper situation had "killed business for us." to theatres and movies," he said. He recalled that "every Saturday night since we opened WCBS-TV said that the station had received many in October we've had a full house . . . but last Saturday calls, but it was able to accommodate only a few new ad­ we only played to half a house. Business had been rising vertisers. steadily ... and now it's declining just as steadily." "We've had a lot of business from movie openings. We've Even "The Three-Penny Opera," a firmly established just signed for a four-day saturation program for 'Rally show, reported a dip in profits because of the strike. "It's Round the Flag.' " really hit us at our midweek performances," said Clifford The box-office manager of an off-Broadway theater com­ plained that the strike had "killed business.'' Stevens, assistant to the producers. At Madison Square Garden, where drops in attendance At Madison Square Garden indoor polo matches lost an at different sports ranged from three to 25 per cent, a new estimated three per cent of their spectators, while atten­ promotional campaign was launched to supply spectators dance at basketball games dropped 25 per cent. with information normally carried in newspapers. But Maurice Savage, owner of the Garden Ice Skating Cultural centers like the Metropolitan Opera, Town Hall Club near Madison Square Garden, said business was and Carnegie Hall reported business was as brisk as ever "okay." despite the absence of newspapers. Madison Square Garden seemed to be the sports establish­ However, some travel agencies that rely heavily on news­ ment most concerned about continued cuts in attendance. paper advertising reported otherwise. In their case there Fred Podesta, promotion and advertising director, put was a 20 to 50 per cent drop in bookings. more information in programs at hockey and basketball Neighborhood movie houses carried on as usual, but games. He also issued fuller publicity releases to radio and one downtown movie theater was spending "thousands of television stations. dollars" on radio and television publicity for a new film Podesta pointed out, however, that radio and television to attract the crowds that otherwise would have been coverage and criticism, cannot take the place of newspaper drawn by ads in newspapers. reports. The general impression was that sports fans In the theater district, established shows, like "My Fair preferred stories to read. Lady" and "Music Man," shrugged off the newspaper shut­ This appeared to be equally true in the field of music. down and were still playing to packed houses. Felix Salmaggi of the Long Island Opera Co., Inc., noted The ones handicapped the most were shows that opened that many artists invested thousands of dollars in concerts after the papers suspended publication. just for the sake of the New York newspaper reviews. 30 NIEMAN REPORTS Reviews Herhlock Nails 'Em Again Gerald Johnson's Bite By Perry Morgan By Howard Simons HERBLOCK'S SPECIAL FOR TODAY, cartoons? They're here. The fatcat who THE LINES ARE DRAWN. By Gerald Simon and Schuster, 255 pp., $3.95. wished to purchase a few jars of instant W. Johnson. J. B. Lippincott Company. Herblock's best when caught in the act science; the caveman who says on seeing 224 pp. $ .95. of pricking bureaucratic bubbleheads or the flight of an arrow that it's a neat trick unsettling the sanctimonious. There's no with no significance; the two DAR aghast Gerald W. Johnson's newest book, The place like a newspaper fairly hot off the at the sight of a globe for sale; the FBI Lines are Drawn, is subtitled "American presses for displaying the work of a news- chief who avers the Supreme Court "must Life Since the First World War as Re­ paper cartoonist. Every day's distance · · · join all the forces for good in protect­ flected in the Pulitzer Prize Cartoons." between the event and the cartoon that ing society." The subtitle is misleading. It should read came out of it saps the cartoon of some But one shouldn't sink too deeply and "American Life Since the First World of its flavor and sharpness. comfortably into an easy chair with this War as Reflected in the Mind of Gerald But who wants to be a nitpicker? If the book. Herblock is deeply concerned with W. Johnson." loss of immediacy is a problem for the the follies of government and there is a The book is really two books; one for reader of this book, it isn't much of a great deal of pleasure in seeing the needle the show and two for the money. problem. For with a 30,000-word text sink in. But he's also concerned with the The "show" book contains full-page Herblock does an excellent job of stage- indolence and complacency of the citizenry, reproductions of the prize-winning car­ setting for the 430 cartoons covering the and it could be that before you reach the toons; brief biographical sketches of the behavior of politicians (mostly U. S.) at last page you will begin to feel a few sharp cartoonists under the heading "Digression home, abroad and in the air during the pricks yourself. on the Man;" and parenthetical references last three years. Across from a cartoon of Something should be said about Herb­ to why the cartoon was paradoxically both a deepfreeze stocked with "frozen atti- lock's talent with a typewriter: that he significant and not significant enough for tudes, frozen platitudes and Foster's frost- writes almost as well as he draws should be its time. ed, fruitless policies," Herblock remarks in praise enough for the nation's best car- The "money" book contains a series of text on a we l! k nown d ip 1omat who "keeps toonist. masterful columns written by a wise man going at a great clip and has frequently ,-, ' S J\ LL. Q Q~ traveled tremendous distances to sit tight." E., It all comes back, you see. The juices bubble, the tension rises, the page turns and ZOWIE! Herblock has nailed 'em again. If this is a partisan reaction, the book is a 255-page parade of partisan reactions. But the only unfair thing about it is the publisher's blurb suggesting the book "will be relished by all connoisseurs of pointed words and pictures, whether or not they share the author's point of view." Come now, Messrs. Simon and Schuster. This is hardly the sort of surprise package sym­ pathizers should send to members of the numerous and still growing band of Un­ horsed Crusaders. Herblock has been something less than enthusiastic about the conduct of the fed­ eral government these last few years. Sometimes in anger, always with sharp perception, he looks back on the neglect of education, the abuse of non-conformists the disdain for intellectuals, the attacks o~ the Supreme Court, the mania for secrecy, the glorification of the Good Guys, and the varying success of several lobbies-oil billboards and gas. ' You have favorites among Herblock's -Howard Simons NIElMAN REPORTS 31 looking back on what were current events Impact of Bill Lederer Overseas Americans for him, and history for some of us. It is a short, incisive national biography with According to a CBS broadcast, Nov. 25, By Daphne Whittam Mr. Johnson telling us where we have the President was moved to appoint the THE UGLY AMERICAN, by William been, where we are, and where we are go­ Draper Committee to make an analysis of J. Lederer and Eugene Burdick, W. W. our foreign aid programs, by reading The ing. Norton Co. N. Y. 285 pp. $3.75 Ugly American by Bill Lederer and What holds the two books together is The authors of "The Ugly American" Mr. Johnson's contention that the pen is Eugene Burdick. are men with a message and a compelling mightier than the Pulitzer. sense of the need to put this message Mr. Johnson points out that the advisory across to the American people. This is committeemen that have selected the prize­ masterful in context or out. I would like perhaps the only justification for the fact winning cartoons have been reflectors and to illustrate with two random excerpts: that they have been chosen to use the lines not refractors-they have mirrored public of a caricature rather than a portrait in opinion in the United States, not bent it. "As silicosis is the logical fate of the gold miner, and the bends that of the diver, drawing their picture of Americans over­ This opinion has been (and is) the child seas, and have thrown together a book of the upper-middleclass. Because it is so the politician may expect to end as a stuffed shirt. It is his occupational dis­ which can make no pretence to literary dominant it precludes controversy and achievement. The authors themselves exudes conservatism. ease, and the most elaborate protective measures are no sure defense against it. claim a stronger justification, that of truth, "You will find, therefore," Mr. John­ The one injection that offers practically in their "factual epilogue" which asserts son writes, "that the persons charged with perfect immunity is humor but from the that they have witnessed a sufficient num­ the duty of selecting a cartoon that meets politician's standpoint that remedy is ber of examples of serious inadequacy and the high approval of the American people, worse than the disease, because too stiff a incredible stupidity in the performance of have, practically without exception, chosen dose will result in paralysis of the political American diplomats and technicians in a noncontroversial one, and rarely one that South East Asia to refute any charge of function." pins guilt on an individual, except such "over-drawing." individuals as Hitler and Stalin concern­ "The fact that the public, taken en As an "inside observer" I would say that ing whose sinfulness there is no con­ masse, is iron-skulled means that many there have been instances where American troversy." excellent ideas are woefully slow to pene­ diplomats have been totally unable to ad­ trate; but it also means that innumerable The result, as Mr. Johnson makes clear, just to the strange environment of Asia, idiocies bounce off. When one stops to is that there are no cartoons dealing with and cases where a lamentable lack of sen­ Ku Kluxism, Prohibition and any num­ consider that of the total number of new sitivity has repelled Asian people. But ber of other vital issues. ideas propounded every day those that there have also been many American are idiotic vastly outnumber those that are Turning the pages and looking only at Foreign Service personnel who have stri­ sound, the impermeability of the human ven to do an adequate, if unspectacular cartoons one cannot fail to agree with Mr. mind may not be its fatal defect, but its Johnson's contention. job. There are no Americans overseas who saving grace." are as good as the "good" Americans in But one questions whether the same The Lz~nes are Drawn is not written "The Ugly American," who are painted arguments can be applied to the written to bounce. as knights in shining armor, nor as bad as words that have won the Pulitzer Prize? Let me have a brief digression on the the "bad" Americans, who are painted as And if they don't, wherein lies the diff­ man. Mr. Johnson has been a journalist ignorant oafs. erence? Perhaps it is because the political for as many years as the Pulitzer committee But the "message" of the book is that cartoon is too far removed physically has been selecting prize cartoons. For the the United States must improve her repre­ from the front page, both for the reader lion's share of the years spanning the sentation abroad both diplomatically and and the Pulitzer judges. award he was a member of the team of in the field of technical assistance, and Most of the cartoons are dated and need Johnson, Owens, Mencken and Kent that with this it is easy to agree. However, the brief explanation Mr. Johnson gives emitted radiation from the Baltimore Sun­ even in this respect, the authors appear to them. But the meat and potatoes of the papers. It is clear from his book that to have been swept by their righteous in­ book is what Mr. Johnson has to say on Gerald W. Johnson is not bogged down dignation into making suggestions which what the cartoon does not say. Taking the in the upper-middle-class opinion morass. do not seem feasible. They are demand­ events of the times, year by year, he draws On the contrary, his writing and thinking ing of all Foreign Service personnel a mis­ bold word strokes, shading in those areas are all he wants a political cartoon to be­ sionary zeal and a dedication to duty that need it and forcing light on others. humor, wit, morality, idealism and "tren­ which would override considerations of He talks of war and peace, agriculture chant comment on the contemporary situ­ personal comfort, health and even family and labor, lynching and law, totalitarian­ ation, and if the situation is ugly ... not ties. One specific suggestion which seems ism and economics. filled with sweetness and light." You may difficult of accomplishment is that all For­ The word pictures he draws to illustrate not always agree with this gadfly but you eign Service personnel and their depen­ a point, a pet peeve, or a problem are can't help feeling his bite. dents be taught the language of the coun- 32 NIEMAN REPORTS tries to which they are assigned, on the wards their Foreign Service. Since Ame­ of the role of the individual in State and assumption that it is possible to acquire a ricans have a deep-rooted distrust of gov­ community which is different from that working knowledge of a foreign language ernment in all its forms, the Foreign Serv­ acceptable to the West. In old China, the in 12 weeks. ice, like other branches of government, law, sanctity of contract and free private This does not mean that more practical tends to be a low-prestige occupation, and enterprise never became a sacred trinity. measures in respect of selection and train­ hence probably attracts less talent, unlike Another historical factor reinforcing ing should not and could not be adopted the British Foreign Service, which has a modern authoritarianism is the peculiarly to improve the quality of the American long tradition of elite-selection behind it. passive attitude of non-officials toward Foreign Service. These would include less This accords ill with the heavy respon­ government, the apparent irresponsibility emphasis on political appointments to sibilities which the United States is now of the individual citizen towards affairs of senior posts, the willingness to keep per­ being called upon to assume in the inter­ State. This passivity complements, and sonnel for longer periods in particular national field. also conduces to, authoritarian govern­ countries, or at least areas, and the aban­ But however unwillingly America ment. donment of the concept that diplomats comes to the role of world leader, the China's acceptance of foreign faiths to­ lose objectivity as they become better in­ role is inescapable and it is time that she day is not without historical parallel. "In formed about the countries to which they began seriously to fit herself for it. retrospect we can see the Buddhist age, are assigned. roughly from the fourth to the ninth cen­ But even the adoption of such measures Daphne Whittam, associate editor of turies A.D., when a foreign religion with would hardly be sufficient without a reori­ The Nation in Rangoon, Burma is now in a new system of values and institutions entation of the attitude of Americans to- Cambridge as an associate Nieman Fellow. became dominant in Chinese life, is the chief prototype of the modern invasion of China by the West. What example does Fairbank on China China's experience of this foreign religion By T.V. Parasuram set before us? Neither Christianity nor Marxism form exact parallels. Yet Chi­ THE UNITED STATES AND CHINA: and democratic processes, of industrializa­ na's acceptance of foreign faiths today new edition. By John King Fairbank, tion and nationalistic chauvinism, of the has overtones of the past." Harvard University Press, Cambridge, individual's relation to government-are Similarly, Mao Tse-tung's remolding of Mass. 365 pp. $5.50. likely to be common, with variations, for Chinese society-"his recruiting and in­ all of Asia. Much of what this book says China is not an easy topic to discuss in doctrinating an elite, setting it to organize about China could be said also of Indo- the United States but Harvard historian the life of the peasantry, and using their China, Indonesia and India." John King Fairbank is eminently quali­ labor and product for public works-is fied for the task. Apart from his profound Fairbank's conclusion about the impact not as unprecedented in China as the Com­ scholarship and intimate first-hand knowl­ of population on Chinese politics is dis­ munists and some of their critics would edge of China, he has a peculiar additional concerting to one who believes in the uni­ have us believe," as the more than two qualification-he has been "identified" by versal values of democracy and refuses to thousand miles of the great Wall attests. Louis Budenz as part of a "hard inner concede that democracy is all right for the There are also precedents in China for core" of an alleged pro-communist con­ settled communities of the West but pos­ the Communist censorship. "The K'ang­ spiracy, while in Peking he has been cited sibly not for all the newly independent hsi Emperor at the turn of the eighteenth as an "imperialist spy" and "the number­ countries of Asia and Africa. Fairbank century presided over the production of one cultural secret-agent of American im­ argues that in the "crowded circumstances a famous dictionary and of a vast encyclo­ perialism." (He reminds us, in a foot­ of Chinese politics"-within forty years pedia in 5020 chapters. His great successor, note of these twin charges.) the Chinese population is expected to the Ch'ien-lung Emperor, sponsored an Fairbanks calls in this book for an touch the billion mark-"the potentialities edition of the tweny-four dynastic histo­ "unafraid appraisal of revolutionary China of our type of individual freedom under ries and a collection of all Chinese litera­ on a discriminating basis" and points out law are limited. . . . Supposing that the ture in 'The Complete Library of the Four that "our problem in China is only the Chinese Communst Party had not come Treasuries.' This compilation included forefront of our problems in all of Asia. to power, the rulers of China today, who­ 3462 works .... By means of this vast pro­ As a nation we must develop a new under­ ever they were, would confront the same ject the Manchu court in fact conducted standing and new policies towards the rev­ general problem of numbers pressing upon a literary inquisition, one of their objects olutionary process now at work among substance, of dense masses to be mobilized. being to suppress all works that reflected Asia's peasant masses. The Asian half In their efforts to achieve industrialism and on alien rulers. In searching out rare of mankind is entering upon an era of nationalism, their treatment of the individ­ books and complete texts for inclusion in change which the West has precipitated ual in China would be very different from this master library, the compilers were able but cannot control. To a large extent the our way in America." at the same time to search out all hetero­ crises and solutions which develop in China's historical tradition and social dox works which should be banned or China-concerning questions of popula­ institutions, he goes on, unfortunately destroyed. . . . The works proscribed in­ tion and food supply, of living standards lend considerable sanction to an evaluation cluded studies of military or frontier NIEMAN REPORTS 33 affairs, criticisms anti-barbarian in tone, lations was different from the American superficial autocracy proved viable under and chiefly items which extolled the pre­ experience. We found our contact with one Chinese dynasty after another. We ceding Chinese dynasty .of the Ming. Al­ China adventurous, exhilarating, reward­ cannot conclude that Chinese Commun­ together, some 2320 works were suppress­ ing in material or spiritual terms. Ameri­ ism's obvious evils are likely to be suffi­ ed. This was thought control on the largest cans who didn't like it could avoid it. cient to destroy it. Clutching at this straw scale." China, on the other hand, found this con­ will not help us. The author traces the Chinese revolu­ tact forced upon her. It was a foreign in­ "In short, we have to face it. tion of today to the Taiping Rebellion of vasion, humiliating, disruptive, and in the "Once this psychological adjustment has 1851-64, a full lifetime before Marxism en­ end catastrophic. There can be little doubt been made, we can set to work to live in tered China. The Taiping rebels were that the Western menace to the traditional the same world with the new China. In­ mainly peasants. They had never heard of Chinese way of life often seemed, in the tellectuaJ recognition of

Postscripts: of the Park Region Echo, Alexandria, The Jan. 8 program has Edwin A. Lahey Minn. He was formerly city editor. ( 1939) and Clark Mollenhoff ( 1950) as Harold Liston ( 1957), recently city edi­ William B. Dickinson (1940) became guests. Harry Montgomery (1941) is tor of the Bloomington Pantagraph, has managing editor of the Philadelphia Bul­ scheduled on a later program. joined the AP in Chicago. letin at the end of the year. Irving Dilliard (1939), of the St. Louis Our Reviewers: Reviews in this issue are by the fol­ Post-Dispatch editorial page, is the first The Press and the People non-academic member of the senate of lowing Nieman Fellows of this year: Phi Beta Kappa, elected at their last On December 19 a new television pro­ Perry Morgan, editorial page editor, Char­ meeting. gram called "The Press and the People" lotte News; Leon Svirsky (1946), managing editor had its first showing on some 40 educa­ Howard Simons, managing editor, Science of Scientific American since its start, has tional television stations, and several Service; become editor of Basic Books, which will others. It is produced at WGBH in Boston T. V. Parasuram, chief parliamentary cor­ try to do in books what the magazine by a grant from the Fund for the Re­ respondent, Press Trust of India; does in articles. public. It is to run weekly for 13 weeks, Daphne Whittam, associate editor, The John Obert (1957), is now the editor with Louis M. Lyons (1939) as moderator. Nation, Rangoon.