Analysis of Intestinal Bacterial Community Diversity of Adult Dastarcus Helophoroides Author(S): Z
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Analysis of Intestinal Bacterial Community Diversity of Adult Dastarcus helophoroides Author(s): Z. Q. Zhang, C. He, M. L. Li Source: Journal of Insect Science, 14(114):1-13. 2014. Published By: Entomological Society of America DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.014.114 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1673/031.014.114 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 14 | Article 114 Zhang et al. Analysis of intestinal bacterial community diversity of adult Dastarcus helophoroides Z. Q. Zhang1a, C. He2b, M. L. Li1c* 1Laboratory of Forestry Pests Biological Control, College of Forestry, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China 2Wuwei academy of Forestry Sciences, WuWei, Gansu, 733000, China Abstract Polymerase chain reaction denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE), and a culture- dependent technique were used to study the diversity of the intestinal bacterial community in adult Dastarcus helophoroides (Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Bothrideridae). Universal bacterial pri- mers targeting 200 bp regions of the 16S rDNA gene were used in the PCR-DGGE assay, and 14 bright bands were obtained. The intestinal bacteria detected by PCR-DGGE were classified to Enterococcus (Lactobacillales: Enterococcaceae), Bacillus (Bacillales: Bacillaceae), Cellvibrio (Pseudomonadales: Pseudomonadaceae), Caulobacter (Caulobacterales: Caulobacteraceae), and uncultured bacteria, whereas those isolated by the culture-dependent technique belonged to Staphylococcus (Bacillales: Staphylococcaceae), Pectobacterium Enterobacteriales: Enterobacte- riaceae), and Enterobacter (Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae). These intestinal bacteria represented the groups Lactobacillales (Enterococcus), Pseudomonadales (Cellvibrio), Caulobac- terales (Caulobacter), Bacilli (Bacillus and Staphylococcus), and Gammaproteobacteria (Pectobacterium and Enterobacter). Our results demonstrated that PCR-DGGE analysis and the culture-dependent technique were useful in determining the intestinal bacteria of D. helophoroid- es and the two methods should be integrated to characterize the microbial community and diversity. Keywords: PCR-DGGE assay, culture-dependent technique Correspondence: a [email protected], b [email protected], c [email protected], *Corresponding author Editor: Allen Cohen was editor of this paper. Received: 8 October 2012 Accepted: 20 February 2013 Published: 12 August 2014 Copyright: This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed. ISSN: 1536-2442 | Vol. 14, Number 114 Cite this paper as: Zhang ZQ, He C, Li ML. 2014. Analysis of intestinal bacterial community diversity of adult Dastarcus helophoroides. Journal of Insect Science 14(114). Available online: http://www.insectscience.org/14.114 Journal of Insect Science | http://www.insectscience.org 1 Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 14 | Article 114 Zhang et al. Introduction tus Kollbe (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) (Hongoh et al. 2003), Hepialus gonggaensis Many insects are inhabited by diverse com- Fu & Huang (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae) (Zhuo munities of microorganisms. It is possible that 2005), Bombyx mori L. (Lepidoptera: Bomby- the number of microbes in most insects is cidae) (Xiang et al. 2007), Anopheles sinensis larger than the number of somatic cells Wiedemann (Diptera: Culicidae) (Wang (Campbell 1990). The intestinal microbial 2008), and Costelytra zealandica (White) bacteria in insects have been shown to play (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) (Zhang and Jack- important roles, such as providing vitamins, son 2008), but few reports are available on the aiding in fat and carbohydrate metabolism, intestinal bacteria of Dastarcus helophoroides preventing the invasion of external bacteria, (= longulus) (Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Both- and promoting the function of the immune rideridae). This parasitic beetle is an important system (Eutick et al. 1978, Abe et al. 2000, natural enemy of long-horned beetles (Ogura Suchodolski and Ruaux 2004). Insects’ guts et al. 1999) and is therefore an important ex- offer many niches for bacteria, while the in- perimental insect. sects take advantage of the bacterial metabolism and the adaptability of prokary- Amann et al. (1995) indicated that only 0.1– otes (Dillon and Dillon 2004). For example, 15% of microbes from natural environments extensive research has revealed the symbiotic could grow in artificial media. Hence, results relationship between termites and bacteria. from culture-dependent methods only partially Microbes provide carbon, nitrogen, and other reflected the real microbial communities and nutrient sources to their host termites, and restricted our past knowledge of microbial termites can no longer live without them ecology. For example, when culture- (Hongoh et al. 2003). The analysis of intesti- dependent methods were applied to assay the nal bacteria was performed by culture- gut microbial community of H. gonggaensis dependent and molecular methods. The cul- larvae, 12 bacteria were isolated (Zhuo et al. ture-dependent technique defined the gut 2004). In contrast, by using a PCR-DGGE as- microbes by phenotypic characterization say, Zhuo (2005) separated 76 bands that all (morphology, immunology, and physiologi- represented different bacteria from this insect. cal-biochemical reaction), but unculturable Muyzer et al. (1993) were among the first re- bacteria were largely ignored (Lysenko 1985). searchers who used DGGE to analyze the Molecular biology methods allowed extract- genetic diversity of microorganisms in algal- ing the total genomic DNA of bacteria directly fungal and bacterial biofilms, and their results from samples and then sequencing and ana- indicated that this technique offered ad- lyzing the DNA to characterize the bacteria vantages over culture-dependent methods in species composition and abundance (Yu et al. revealing natural microbial communities. 2008). The aim of this study was to analyze the di- Coupled polymerase chain reaction and dena- versity of the intestinal bacterial community turing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR- in adult D. helophoroides by using culture- DGGE) and other modern molecular biologi- dependent and PCR-DGGE techniques and to cal technologies have been applied to study compare the results obtained by both methods. the microbial diversity and dominant species in many insects, such as Reticulitermes spera- Journal of Insect Science | http://www.insectscience.org 2 Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 14 | Article 114 Zhang et al. Materials and Methods 50 µL, consisting of 25 µL 2× Es Taq Master Mix (with dye; CWBIO, Sample collection www.cwbiotech.com), 19 µL RNase-free Adults of D. helophoroides were obtained H2O, 2 µL of each primer, and 2 µL template from the Laboratory of Forest Pest Biological DNA. The PCR was performed in a DNA En- Control, College of Forestry, Northwest Agri- gine Dyas Peltier Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad culture and Forestry University, China. All Life Science Product, Hercules, CA). The am- insects were maintained and reared in con- plification program (designed by lab trolled incubators at 25 ± 1°C, 50-70% members) was as follows: an initial denatura- relative humidity (RH), and a photoperiod of tion at 95°C for 5 min; 29 cycles of 10:14 (L:D) on an artificial diet (Zhang et al. denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 2014). The adult beetles were starved for 12 55°C for 30 sec, extension at 72°C for 90 sec, hr to allow elimination of the food bolus. The and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The digestive tracts were carefully removed from amplification products were purified with a the abdomen by using sterile dissecting nee- universal DNA purification kit (TIANGEN dles, and five guts were pooled and crushed Biotech, Beijing, China). gently with a pestle in liquid nitrogen. DGGE analysis Genomic DNA extraction and 16S rDNA The PCR products (30 μL) were separated and amplification analyzed by DGGE on an 8% polyacrylamide A modified cetyltrimethyl ammonium bro- gel with a denaturant-gradient of 35-60% mide method was used for genomic DNA (100% defined as 7 M solid urea and 40% de- TM extraction (Calderón-Cortés et al. 2010). The ionized formamide [v/v]) in a Dcodek extracted genomic DNA was electrophoresed Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio- through a 1.0% TAE (40 mM Tris, 20 mM Rad). The electrophoresis was carried out in acetic acid, 1.0 mM Na2-EDTA, 1.0% aga- 1× TAE buffer (40 mM Tris, 20 mM acetic rose) gel for detection of the extracted acid, 1.0 mM Na2-EDTA) at 35 V and 60°C genomic